WO2012109345A1 - Détecteur d'objet caché - Google Patents

Détecteur d'objet caché Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012109345A1
WO2012109345A1 PCT/US2012/024317 US2012024317W WO2012109345A1 WO 2012109345 A1 WO2012109345 A1 WO 2012109345A1 US 2012024317 W US2012024317 W US 2012024317W WO 2012109345 A1 WO2012109345 A1 WO 2012109345A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
detector
frequency
obstruction
hidden object
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2012/024317
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David Scott HOLBROOK
Robert W SENGSTAKEN, Jr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Walleye Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Walleye Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Walleye Technologies Inc filed Critical Walleye Technologies Inc
Publication of WO2012109345A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012109345A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N22/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of microwaves or radio waves, i.e. electromagnetic waves with a wavelength of one millimetre or more

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to the field of object sensing and more particularly to the field of sensing the presence of objects hidden behind visually obscuring material.
  • the example use of such hidden object detectors is the detection of the location of wall support studs, once the studs have been covered by the wall material, for example plasterboard, in the residential or commercial construction trades. It is desirable to know the location of wall studs when, for example, one is mounting heavy objects to the wall, e.g., shelving, since heavy objects may pull loose from the wall if they are not attached directly to the studs.
  • a hidden object detector When used for stud detection, a hidden object detector ideally has a low false alarm rate. That is, the detector should not indicate the presence of a stud when no stud is present.
  • a second, related use of a hidden object detector is to indicate the presence of utilities (for example, water or drain pipes or electrical wiring) in the hollow cavity behind the wall and between the studs.
  • utilities for example, water or drain pipes or electrical wiring
  • a detector ideally has a low miss rate. That is, it should not indicate that it is safe to drill into the wall when, in reality, there is a utility at the tested location.
  • a false alarm is generally preferred to a missed object; a hole in the wall can easily be patched but a damaged utility can mean an expensive repair or even, in the case of electrical wiring, injury or death to the drill operator.
  • stud sensors are commercially available. Typically these sensors are scanned along a wall and are designed to flash an indication when they are in the close proximity of a stud behind the wall. Generally these devices work by sensing either the metal drywall screws used to attach drywall to studs or by sensing a change in capacitance when the dielectric constant beneath the sensor changes due to a stud behind the sheetrock. Typically these sensors perform adequately on new construction, where drywall under a skim coat of plaster is the rule and the location of studs can be confirmed easily by checking at multiples of 16 inches for the presence of neighboring studs. These same sensors are less useful in older construction, where plaster on lath walls might be found or where the 16 inch stud spacing might not hold. Similarly, these sensors are generally inadequate when used to find utilities behind the finish wall. This shortcoming is not surprising since they were not designed for such a task.
  • the hidden object imager uses a rotating optic/antenna to form a flying spot scanner/reimager system while the reference target transfer system uses an expanding cone of transmitted radiation from a point source that is retro-imaged by the reference target and "tracked" by a rudimentary centroid tracker.
  • the imager while performing admirably as a hidden object detector, is more complex than is usually desired for simple drill/no-drill decision making and the reference target transfer system requires access to the far side of the wall in question and only indicates the presence or absence of a stud or utility by inference when the object blocks the signal.
  • the present invention employs a beam of microwave radiation, where, herein, microwave radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths generally longer than 100 microns and shorter than 10 centimeters, to penetrate an obstruction, e.g., a visibly opaque wall, separating two locations to generate a reference between those locations.
  • microwave radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths generally longer than 100 microns and shorter than 10 centimeters, to penetrate an obstruction, e.g., a visibly opaque wall, separating two locations to generate a reference between those locations.
  • an obstruction e.g., a visibly opaque wall
  • Many materials typically utilized in construction are transparent to microwave radiation of appropriate frequency.
  • a transmitted reference beam having one or more appropriate frequency components can be projected through a visually opaque obstruction, e.g., a wall, to interact with a positionally and/or angularly sensitive detection device that can sense the transmitted beam.
  • Some embodiments operate in a single-pass mode in which a radiation beam is transmitted once through the obstruction, e.g., a wall, and is sensed by a detection device (e.g., a plurality of sensors operating in a differential mode).
  • a detection device e.g., a plurality of sensors operating in a differential mode.
  • other embodiments operate in a double-pass mode in which a radiation beam (e.g., microwave beam) emitted by a microwave source passes through the obstruction (e.g., a wall), reflects from a reference device, passes back through the obstruction and is positionally sensed.
  • a radiation beam e.g., microwave beam
  • the invention provides a measurement system that includes a source of microwave radiation having one or more wavelengths capable of penetrating through a visibly opaque obstruction, e.g., a wall.
  • the source can be movably positioned on one side of the obstruction for illuminating thereof.
  • the system can further include a microwave reflecting element disposed on another side of the obstruction, where the reflecting element is capable of reflecting at least a portion of the radiation transmitted through the obstruction.
  • a plurality of radiation sensors are positioned relative to the obstruction so as to detect, e.g., differentially, at least a portion of the reflected radiation transmitted through the obstruction to determine a position of the source relative to the reflective element.
  • the radiation source generates radiation with one or more wavelengths corresponding to a frequency range of about 1 GHz to about 24 GHz (more typically, in a range of about 3 to about 8 GHz) or any other suitable wavelength range.
  • suitable microwave sources include, without limitation, Gunn oscillators, magnetrons, IMP ATT diodes, Dielectric Resonator Oscillators (DROs), MIMICs or other suitable radio frequency oscillators.
  • the sensors are positioned relative to one another and the source so as to generate a differential null signal when the source, and more particularly the propagating direction of the radiation generated by the source, and the reflective element are substantially aligned.
  • the sensors can be positioned to generate a differential null signal when an optical axis of the source is aligned (its extension would intersect) with a reference location of the reflective element (e.g., its geometrical center).
  • a measurement system in another aspect, includes an electromagnetic imager adapted to generate images of an interior portion of a visibly opaque obstruction, where the imager comprises a source coupled to a focusing element for focusing radiation directed to a proximal side of the obstruction into an interior portion thereof and a detector for detecting at least a portion of the radiation propagating back from the obstruction.
  • the system further includes a reflective focusing element disposed on a distal side of the obstruction for reflecting at least a portion of the radiation propagating through the obstruction.
  • the detector detects at least a portion of the reflected radiation for determining an alignment of the source relative to the reflective element.
  • the obstruction comprises a wall
  • the reflective focusing element has a focal length of about 1 ⁇ 4 of the wall's thickness.
  • a measurement system comprising a source of microwave radiation adapted to generate a radiation beam having at least one wavelength capable of penetrating an obstruction (e.g., a visibly opaque one), where the source is movably positioned on one side of the obstruction for illuminating thereof with said radiation beam.
  • the system further includes at least two sensors positioned on another side of the obstruction such that each sensor detects at least a portion of radiation transmitted through the obstruction so as to determine a position of said source relative to a reference point on said obstruction.
  • the sensors are adapted to differentially detect the radiation.
  • the sensors are adapted to generate a null signal when the source is aligned with said reference point.
  • the radiation source is capable of generating radiation with one or more frequency components in a range of about 1 GHz to about 24 GHz, e.g., in a range of about 10 GHz to about 20 GHz.
  • the invention provides a measurement method, which comprises movably disposing a radiation source on one side of a visibly opaque obstruction, said source generating radiation having at least one wavelength capable of penetrating through the obstruction.
  • the method further calls for associating a reference element to a location at an opposed side of the obstruction, where the element is reflective to said at least one wavelength.
  • a radiation beam having said wavelength is directed from the source to the obstruction such that at least a portion of said radiation penetrates the obstruction to illuminate said reflective element, and at least a portion of radiation reflected by the element is detected, e.g., differentially, at two or more spatially separate locations so as to determine a position of the source relative to the reflective element.
  • the invention provides a source of microwave radiation movably disposed on one side of a visibly opaque obstruction, the source generating a slowly expanding beam of radiation, and further providing two radiation detectors disposed to receive radiation scattered in the backward direction (viz., in a direction from the
  • the receiving apertures of the detectors are generally symmetrically located adjacent to the emitting aperture of the source.
  • the invention provides a signal processing method, which comprises phase detection of the signals from the two radiation detectors to determine the distance in depth of the scattering object.
  • the invention provides a radiation source wherein the transmitted microwave radiation is modulated using the so called Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) technique, also called chirp modulation.
  • FMCW Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • FIGURE 1 A schematically depicts an example measurement system in accordance with one embodiment
  • FIGURE IB schematically depicts the propagation of radiation from the source in the measurement system of FIGURE 1A via a proximal side of the wall into its interior to be reflected by a reflecting element disposed at a distal side of the wall;
  • FIGURE 2 schematically depicts an example measurement system in accordance with another embodiment in which a source and a detector are disposed on the same side of an obstruction;
  • FIGURE 3 schematically depicts geometrical disposition of a source and four detectors of an example measurement system according to an embodiment relative to one another;
  • FIGURE 4 schematically depicts a microwave source and four sensor channels suitable for use in some embodiments;
  • FIGURE 5 schematically depicts the profile of a measurement tool according to one embodiment having an interface providing visual indicators for indicating direction to null;
  • FIGURE 6 schematically depicts an imager incorporating a measurement system according to one embodiment for referencing coordinates on the back of a wall to those on the front, in which the MD reflector has a focal length that is about 1 ⁇ 4 of the thickness of the wall;
  • FIGURE 7 schematically depicts another embodiment in which a single pass of microwave radiation through an obstruction, e.g., a wall, is employed to align a radiation beam illuminating the obstruction from one side with a coordinate point on another side of that obstruction;
  • an obstruction e.g., a wall
  • FIGURE 8 schematically depicts another embodiment in which the radiation beam is used as a probe to identify the location of in-situ, existing, hidden reflective/scattering objects;
  • FIGURE 9 depicts the microwave radiation generation, transmission, reception and processing elements of an embodiment of a stud sensor at a schematic hardware block diagram level
  • FIGURE 10 illustrates the microwave radiation generation, transmission, reception and processing elements in a data flow diagram
  • FIGURE 11 illustrates schematically the frequency difference generated by two identical chirped signals with a specific time delay
  • FIGURE 12 illustrates the geometrical relationship between the hidden object, the transmit antenna, and the two receive antennae, for one embodiment
  • FIGURE 13 schematically illustrates the disambiguation scheme.
  • visibly opaque obstruction generally refers to a piece of material that substantially (or completely) blocks the passage of visible radiation (e.g., radiation having wavelengths in a range of about 400 nm to about 700 nm) therethrough.
  • visible radiation e.g., radiation having wavelengths in a range of about 400 nm to about 700 nm
  • a beam of light can lose more than about 90% of its intensity as it passes through the obstruction.
  • the visibly opaque obstruction is assumed to be a wall. It should, however, be understood that the measurement systems and methods can be employed to project reference datums through other types of obstructions and, in other embodiments, to detect objects hidden behind other types of obstructions, for example, to detect a metal object under a coat or in a suitcase.
  • microwave radiation Although some embodiments operate with electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths in the 100 micron to 10,000 micron band- technically millimeter or centimeter waves, this radiation is often called microwave radiation, a term that is used herein.
  • FIGURES 1 A and IB schematically depict an example measurement system that comprises a measurement tool in accordance with one embodiment that can operate in a double-pass mode.
  • the tool includes a radiation source 10 (a source of microwave radiation in this embodiment) and a radiation detector 12 (shown as sensors 12A and 12B) that can be movably disposed on a proximal side of an obstruction 14, typically referred to herein as a wall.
  • the microwave radiation source projects a beam of microwave radiation through the proximal side of the wall.
  • a reflecting microwave optical device 16 (herein also referred to as the Microwave Datum or MD) is placed on the distal side of the wall, centered on the measurement point of interest.
  • MD Microwave Datum
  • the MD can comprise a reflecting Fresnel Zone Plate (FZP) with a focal distance chosen to be slightly longer than the thickness of the wall.
  • FZP Fresnel Zone Plate
  • the MD can be a flat sheet typically composed of thin metal foil in a series of concentric zones.
  • An adhesive can be applied to a surface of such a flat MD to allow it to be readily attached to the wall surface.
  • the measurement tool can then be placed against the proximal surface of the wall and moved along that surface to sense the power reflected from the MD, thus determining the location of the MD on the distal side of the wall, as discussed in more detail below.
  • the MD has a focal length chosen to image the source behind itself, as illustrated in Figure IB; that is, the image is at a focal distance slightly longer than the sum of the thickness of the wall and the known distance between the source and the proximal side of the wall.
  • an alert signal is provided to the user.
  • one or more indicators e.g., a set of arrows
  • the relative position of the source and the datum is defined by a vector extending from a fiducial point on the source to a reference point on the datum.
  • the source and the datum are considered aligned when an optical axis of the source (e.g., characterized by a central ray of a beam emitted by the source) is directed towards a reference point (e.g., the geometrical center) of the datum.
  • an optical axis of the source e.g., characterized by a central ray of a beam emitted by the source
  • a reference point e.g., the geometrical center
  • the measurement system operates by differentially sensing a cone of microwave radiation rays forming a beam that is reflected from the MD.
  • the tool's detector functions as a nulling sensor that provides directional information when off null (i.e., when not exhibiting a null signal) to allow the user to quickly converge on the null position.
  • FIGURE IB further illustrates the optical geometry in this embodiment.
  • the source emits a cone of radiation that is transmitted through the wall to the MD.
  • the MD retro-focuses the radiation power to a position behind the proximal surface of the wall.
  • FIGURE 3 shows the source and sensor channels as viewed from the distal side of the wall. If only one dimension of measurement is required then a suitable embodiment of the measurement system would comprise only one pair of sensors, i.e., either sensor A and sensor B or sensor C and sensor D.
  • the following sensing algorithm can be implemented in an electronic circuit to compute a normalized difference signal:
  • V AY k(P A - P B ) / (P A + P B ) (3) where:
  • V AY the output of the circuit with a given datum misalignment
  • V AX k(P C - P D ) / (P C + P D ) (4) where C and D represent the sensors into and out of the plane of the page.
  • the above algorithm produces an output of zero when the tool is aligned on the MD.
  • the output swings from minus to zero and then plus as the tool is scanned across the MD position.
  • the focal distance and diameter of the MD can be easily tailored to accommodate various wall thicknesses.
  • thicker walls require MDs having longer focal lengths, in accordance with Equation (1).
  • the MDs it is preferable for the MDs to have larger diameters.
  • the diameter of the MD increases in proportion to thickness of the wall to maintain the cone angle of the light forming the image of the source. As measured by well known optical parameter f/#, the preferred cone angle is simply:
  • V# MD d / O (5)
  • d is the predetermined distance behind the source at which the source image is to be formed
  • D is the desired diameter of the beam in the plane of the detectors. In some embodiments, D is preferably equal to the diameter of the circle that circumscribes the 4 detectors surrounding the source.
  • the microwave detection method is a standard microwave technique known as frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW).
  • FMCW frequency modulated continuous wave
  • a single Gunn oscillator source for example, including a resonant cavity provides microwave output power.
  • This cavity is also connected to the 4 sensor channels to act as a local oscillator for detection (shown in FIGURE 4).
  • Each of the 4 sensor channels uses, for example, a Schottky diode for detection of the collected microwave power.
  • the tool is battery powered with a 4.5 to 9 V battery.
  • the FMCW signal is processed to estimate the magnitude of the return signal in each sensor channel.
  • the FMCW signal is processed in a phase detection processor which yields both the magnitude of the return signal and the range of the reflecting/scattering object from which the return signal is coming, wherein the range of the object is related to the phase delay of the return signal relative to a local reference signal.
  • the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further, in some embodiments, the tool is fairly compact with approximate dimensions of, for example, 3" in diameter by 3" in height (shown in FIGURE 5). Further,
  • the user interface includes an on/off button and visual indicators, e.g., 4 LEDs which light up to indicate direction to null. Upon reaching a null, the visual indicators provide a selected signal to the user to indicate alignment of the source with the MD, e.g., all 4 LEDs will blink.
  • the radiation source, the sensors, the user interface and the ancillary electronic circuitry are incorporated in a hand-held housing.
  • the frequency of operation depends on the type of material from which the obstruction, e.g., a wall, is formed.
  • a radiation frequency in a range of about 10 GHz to about 24 GHz as radiation in that frequency range exhibits good transmission through a drywall.
  • a lower frequency might be required. Scattering of the microwave beam by inhomogeneities in the concrete is reduced with a lower frequency microwave source (longer wavelength).
  • a radiation frequency in a range of about 1 to about 2 GHz can be employed for obstructions formed of concrete, as radiation in that frequency range transmits better through concrete.
  • some embodiments employ a 1 ⁇ 4 wavelength thickness of a low index of refraction material (plastic) to impedance match the transition of microwaves between air and (high index) concrete.
  • the intensity of the radiation emitted by the source is selected such that the intensity of the radiation reaching the detectors (e.g., via one or two passages through the obstruction) is sufficient for an adequate signal-to-noise ratio of the detectors' outputs.
  • the power output of the source is in a range of about 10 microwatts to about 10 milliwatts
  • the intensity of a radiation beam emitted by the source is in a range of about 10 microwatts per square centimeter to about 10 milliwatts per square centimeter.
  • the geometry of the source and sensor horn antennas is chosen to allow a wide angular admittance of microwave beams without significant attenuation. This results in a small aperture width.
  • a non-differential detection system can be utilized.
  • a source can be aligned with the MD by maximizing the power detected non- differentially by a detector as a function of the detector's position.
  • a radiation source 10 is optically coupled to a beam splitter 18 that passes the radiation from the source, through the wall, onto the MD 16.
  • the beam splitter directs the back-propagating radiation, generated via reflection of the incident radiation by the MD, onto a detector 12.
  • the detector 12 can include a plurality of detecting modules that differentially detect the reflected radiation, e.g., in a manner discussed above, so as to provide an indication of the relative alignment of the source and the MD.
  • the source, the beam splitter and the detector can be disposed in a portable housing that can be readily moved so as to align the source with the MD.
  • the MD reflector is coated with a non-marring adhesive and hence it can be easily relocated on the distal side of the wall so as to function as a reference datum.
  • a camera such as has been disclosed in a U.S. Patent No. 7,626,400 entitled “Electro-Magnetic Scanning Imager, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, can be utilized in conjunction with the MD to reference coordinates on the back of an obstruction (e.g., a wall) to those on the front.
  • the camera includes a radiation source that generates radiation that is capable of penetrating the wall (e.g., radiation with frequency components in a range of about 1 GHz to about 24 GHz).
  • a focusing element coupled to the radiation source focuses the radiation onto an object plane within the wall, and directs at least a portion of the focused radiation propagating back from that object plane onto a detector of the camera.
  • a scanning mechanism coupled to the focusing element causes scanning of the focused radiation on the object plane (in some embodiments, the mechanism provides scanning along one dimension and the movement of the camera by a user provides scanning in an orthogonal dimension).
  • a processor maps the detected radiation to the scanned locations to generate an image of the object plane, which can then be presented to a user in a display module of the camera.
  • the camera scans the front of the wall and sees where the MD reflector is.
  • the focal length of the MD is preferably chosen to be 1 ⁇ 4 of the wall thickness so that the MD would provide a 1 : 1 image of radiation from the camera focused about half way into the wall, as shown schematically in FIGURE 6. In this manner, the coordinates on the back of the wall can be referenced to those on the front.
  • Metals generally reflect or scatter microwave radiation at different frequencies.
  • the attenuation of microwave radiation through a path can be assessed to determine whether that path is free (or at least substantially free) of metals.
  • the intensity of microwave radiation reflected from the MD and detected by the sensors can be compared with the intensity of the radiation illuminating the wall to determine whether the path of the radiation through the wall is substantially free of metal.
  • FIGURE 7 schematically depicts another embodiment in which a single pass of microwave radiation through an obstruction, e.g., a wall, is employed to align a radiation beam illuminating the obstruction from one side with a coordinate point on another side of that obstruction.
  • This example embodiment includes a microwave source 10 that generates radiation with wavelengths suitable for penetration through the wall 14.
  • a detector 12 which comprises four sensors (two of which A and B are shown), symmetrically disposed relative to one another, differentially detects the radiation that has passed through the wall.
  • the detector can be aligned with a coordinate point A on the back surface of the wall by detecting a null signal generated by the detector when the central ray of a cone of diverging microwave radiation from the source illuminating the wall is aligned with that coordinate point.
  • FIGURE 8 schematically depicts another embodiment in which the radiation beam is used as a probe to identify the location of in-situ, existing, hidden reflective/scattering objects located behind the visually opaque obstruction, generally the proximal panel of a wall, where, for convenience, we assume a "wall" comprises two generally parallel panels enclosing a hollow cavity, wherein further the panels are held in position by a framework of studs, viz., typical stud wall construction. Often these objects are studs and/or plumbing/heating pipes and/or electrical cables.
  • the radiation beam is a probe and a pair of detectors are operated in a differential mode to locate the hidden objects.
  • the configuration of this embodiment is called a "stud sensor" although it may detect other hidden objects, as mentioned above.
  • the stud sensor embodiment 100 comprises a source and two detectors as in the arrangement of Figure 1, the detectors in some cases being referenced as sensor A and sensor B.
  • the source is this case is a voltage controlled oscillator 120 coupled to a transmitting ("Tx") antenna 125. As will be explained below, this source may also include a delay line 128.
  • the detectors in this case are receiving ("Rx") antennas 130A, 130B (generally Rx antenna 130) coupled to a mixer 140.
  • the mixer is an "I-Q" mixer.
  • the two Rx antennae are time multiplexed into a single signal path by multiplexing switch 135, whereby only one set of processing electronics, for example, an A/D converter 145 and microprocessor 110, is required.
  • instrument housing 20 comprises a proximal surface 21, which generally faces a user and which typically comprises a user operating interface 22.
  • Instrument housing 20 further comprises a distal surface 24, which faces the obstructing surface (viz., the proximal panel 14A of a wall) and comprises an exit aperture 25, through which the source transmits an expanding cone or beam of radiation 11a, and one or more entrance apertures 26 through which scattered/reflected radiation 1 lb passes to reach Rx antenna(e) 130.
  • housing 20 further comprises a human manual interface (not illustrated), viz., one or more handles, wherein said manual interface is typically
  • the one or more handles comprise a battery compartment or a power attachment interface.
  • receive and transmit antennas 125, 130A, 13 OB are generally disposed facing outward from distal surface 24 of housing 20 and transmit or receive respectively through exit aperture 25 and entrance apertures 26.
  • housing 20 is maintained at a small, substantively fixed distance from the proximal panel 14A of obstruction 14 by one or more non-marring feet 70 or pads attached to distal surface 24 of housing 20.
  • feet 70 may be replaced by wheels or rollers that allow housing 20 to move smoothly along the proximal surface of proximal panel 14A of obstruction 14.
  • a linear displacement sensing apparatus for example a track ball, may be disposed between distal surface 24 and proximal surface 14A, either as a replacement of one or more of the non-marring feet or in addition to the feet.
  • this displacement sensing apparatus is configured to measure displacement of the housing 20 along only one axis, for example the horizontal axis. More generally the housing 20 will be oriented such that the one measured displacement direction is approximately perpendicular to the expected orientation of an expected hidden object 116A. For example, if object 116A is a framing stud, which runs from the floor to the ceiling, then the displacement direction is generally horizontal. On the other hand, if the object is a fire stop between studs, then the housing 20 may be rotated in operation of the detector 12 so the displacement direction will be generally along a vertical axis.
  • FIGURE 9 depicts the microwave radiation generation, transmission, reception and processing elements of an embodiment of a stud sensor at a schematic hardware block diagram level.
  • FIGURE 10 illustrates the same elements in a data flow diagram.
  • a user typically operates the stud sensor by interacting with an internal microprocessor 110 via a user interface 22.
  • the microprocessor can contain user- selectable setup and operating routines although herein we show as an example a basic, default system for clarity.
  • the microprocessor commands a voltage function generator 115 to generate a 18 microsecond voltage ramp, with a 2 microsecond recovery time, which voltage ramp in turn controls the oscillation frequency of a voltage-controlled-oscillator 120 (VCO).
  • VCO voltage-controlled-oscillator 120
  • the voltage range of the ramp generated by function generator 115 for example Vo ⁇ V ⁇ Vmax, has been pre-determined from the component specifications to sweep the oscillation frequency of VCO 120 from, for example, 5.65 gigahertz to 5.85 gigahertz. Preferably, this frequency sweep is substantially linear with time.
  • the VCO is a Hittite HMC431LP4 (available from Hittite Microwave
  • Any signal at or near the frequencies output by VCO 120 may, for convenience, be called an RF (radio frequency) signal.
  • the center frequency of VCO 115 may also be controlled by microprocessor 115.
  • the central frequency is nominally 5.75 gigahertz, a design choice determined by FCC regulations and the expected properties of the materials from which proximal panel 14 A, typically gypsum drywall in recent residential construction, is fabricated.
  • the output signal from VCO 120 is conveyed to Tx antenna 125.
  • a delay line 128 introduces approximately 10 nanoseconds delay into the transmitted signal. This delay, when added to the inherent delay introduced by the round trip the signal takes from Tx antenna 125 to an Rx antenna 130, results in a constant frequency offset, ⁇ , of approximately 80 kilohertz between the received signal and the local oscillator signal, as will be discussed below.
  • the electromagnetic signal leaving Tx antenna 125 is formed into a slowly expanding beam of microwave radiation by the antenna and is directed towards the proximal side of obstruction 14.
  • the microwave radiation frequency is matched to the properties of proximal panel 14A at least a portion of the beam of transmitted microwave radiation will penetrate panel 14 A.
  • the detector 12 is usable to identify the presence of a hidden object 116B that may be located on the distal side of panel 14A at an unknown depth behind the panel.
  • Tx antenna 125 When Tx antenna 125 is in approximate alignment with object 116B, at least a portion of the transmitted radiation will be reflected and/or scattered from object 116B when present.
  • the magnitude of the reflected/scattered radiation is determined by the frequency selected by the designer and the material properties of object 116B and panel 14 A.
  • Metals for example as may be found in wiring, metal studs, and plumbing, generally reflect a high proportion of incident electromagnetic radiation over a wide band of frequency. This high reflectivity of metals is specifically true for radiation at the example frequency of about 5.75 gigahertz. Further, wood (e.g., studs) and PVC (plumbing) also reflect/scatter well at the example frequency of 5.75 gigahertz.
  • Two receiving antennas 130A and 13 OB are illustrated in the example embodiment. As illustrated schematically in FIGURE 9, Rx antennas 130A, 13 OB are typically disposed symmetrically about transmitting antenna 125.
  • the senor has four Rx antennas, where the four antennas are preferably disposed in a square array centered on the Tx antenna.
  • the Rx antenna array is oriented with one pair of antennas in the horizontal axis and the other pair in the vertical axis.
  • the received signals from Rx antennas 130A and 130B are multiplexed into a single transmission line by multiplexing switch 135.
  • this switch is a Hittite HMC232LP4 (available from Hittite Microwave Corporation, 20 Alpha Road, Chelmsford, MA 01824).
  • the switching rate of multiplexing switch 135 should be well below the repetition rate of function generator 115 (50 kilohertz in the example embodiment) and somewhat greater than the instrument's display update rate, which is a user interface design choice.
  • the display update rate is about 10 hertz and the multiplexing switching rate is about 1 kilohertz.
  • the signal from Rx antenna 130A will henceforth be identified as the Left signal or Left channel whilst the signal from Rx antenna 130B will be identified as the Right signal or Right channel.
  • the time multiplexed output from multiplexing switch 135 will simply be identified as the received signal when its left/right identity is not significant.
  • the received signal being output from multiplexing switch 135 is sent to I-Q mixer 140 for mixing (that is, multiplying) with a local oscillator (LO) signal derived from VCO 120 in a so-called homodyne configuration.
  • LO local oscillator
  • a second signal generator and VCO can be used to generate the reference local oscillator, creating a so- called heterodyne configuration.
  • Delay line 128, in other embodiments, may be inserted in any other portion of the RF signal path, preferably in the transmitted or received signal path(s). While functionally acceptable, it is generally not preferred to insert the delay line in the local oscillator path since the length of an LO delay line is significantly longer than what is required in the transmit/receive path.
  • the transmitted and local oscillator signals can be a chirped signal, as described herein, or they can be single frequency signals that are offset from each other in frequency .
  • the received RF signal is combined with the local oscillator signal in I-Q mixer 140 such as model HMC525 (available from Hittite Microwave
  • An I-Q mixer uses a phase shifting process so that the input signal is multiplied (mixed) with both the original and a 90 degree-phase-shifted copy of the local oscillator (e.g., reference) signal.
  • the output of an I-Q mixer is the expected "in-phase” IF signal (the "I” of I-Q) and a "quadrature", or 90 degree phase shifted version of the IF signal (the "Q" of I-Q).
  • the I and Q IF outputs from mixer 140 are then processed to determine the IF signal's magnitude and phase, which are both directly related to the magnitude and phase of the RF received signal.
  • the example embodiment preferably performs this processing in a digital signal processor, which can be part of microcontroller 110, requiring an analog-to-digital conversion in an A/D converter 145.
  • analog magnitude and phase processing circuits are well know in the art.
  • the magnitude of a received signal(s) is indicative of the presence of an object in front of a hidden object detector whilst the phase of a received signal(s) is a measure of the distance between the reflecting/scattering object and the sensor.
  • the relative magnitude between the left channel and right channel is indicative of the left/right position of the object relative to the center line of the hidden object detector.
  • the data must meet three criteria before the sensor will declare that a stud has been sensed.
  • the magnitudes of the left and right channel signals must be greater than a pre-determined threshold, to indicated that the hidden object is a stud and not some smaller object; second, the left and right channel magnitudes must be substantially equal, to indicated that the stud is immediately in front of the device; and third, the depth of the object, as calculated from the phases of the left and/or right channels, must be greater than a pre-determined threshold but less than a second pre- determined threshold.
  • the range of the object must be greater than approximately 12.5 millimeters but less than 25 millimeters, where 12.5 millimeters is assumed to be the minimum thickness of proximal panel 14A.
  • the minimum and maximum object distance can be a user selectable/settable parameter in the microprocessor.
  • the resultant signal has components with frequencies equal to the sum and difference of the frequencies of the two input signals.
  • the received signal is mixed with a local oscillator signal derived from the same source as the received signal; that is, the example embodiment uses homodyne signal processing.
  • the two input signals have nominally identical frequencies so the output is comprised of a high frequency signal (at the sum frequency, approximately twice the oscillator frequency) and a baseband signal (at the difference frequency, near zero).
  • a hidden object detector neither high frequency nor baseband signals are generally desirable.
  • the received microwave frequency signal converted into a convenient so-called intermediate frequency (IF) signal.
  • IF intermediate frequency
  • the intermediate frequency is preferably in the range of 50 kilohertz to 100 kilohertz.
  • Some embodiments of the hidden object detector use a "chirped", or linearly varying frequency, signal.
  • a fixed IF frequency signal is generated by mixing a chirped signal with a time-delayed, equivalently chirped signal, that is, the signal has the form: where S is the frequency slope (time rate of frequency change) of the RF chirp, in hertz, T D is the delay time, co c is the RF carrier frequency, t is time, and an "equivalently chirped signal" is one that has the same frequency sweep rate as the signal being measured. Note that the angular frequency of this cosine is the IF frequency and that
  • the IF frequency is equal to the instantaneous frequency difference between the two swept frequency RF signals, as illustrated schematically in FIGURE 11 for the case of two identical chirped signals with a specific time delay. It should be noted from Equation (7) that the IF frequency depends only on the chirp frequency slope S times the time delay, T D , where the time delay is the sum of the round trip pulse path and the inserted delay line value. Further, the phase of the IF signal is, to first order, simply the product of the carrier frequency cOc times the time delay T D .
  • the sweep time of the chirp is 18 microseconds and the frequency sweep range is 200 megahertz, for a frequency sweep ramp rate of l . lxlO 13 hertz/sec.
  • a total time delay (internal transmission line delays, round trip travel time, and delay line 128) of 7.2 nanoseconds produces an IF frequency of 80 kilohertz.
  • two different chirp signals are employed, generally in alternation, said use of two different chirp signals increasing the unambiguous depth measurement, as will be described below.
  • the first chirp signal produces an IF of 98 kilohertz while the second chirp signal produces an IF of 78 kilohertz.
  • the length of the chirp for both signals is 18 microseconds; only the rate of frequency change is different.
  • the two IF signals, I and Q are digitized by an A/D converter 145 before the magnitude and phase of the received signal are calculated.
  • the IF signals are sampled a short time after they first appear at the output of the mixer, at which time the mixer circuit, by design, has recovered from any transient effects, where said recovery time is a known from the component's manufacturer's specification.
  • the IF samples are obtained approximately 5 microseconds after the leading edge.
  • the phase is digitally calculated as the arctangent 155 of the ratio I/Q, where the signs of I and Q are tracked to provide a full 2 ⁇ output range.
  • this full-range arctangent is represent by the ATAN2 function, which is well know in scientific programming.
  • the time- multiplexed left and right channel signals are processed sequentially and independently with their respective magnitude and phase values being demultiplexed within a logic module 168.
  • the magnitude, M, of the IF signal is quasi-proportional to the size of scattering hidden object behind the obstruction, with the exact relationship being determined by the size, surface profile, and material properties of the object and by the geometric relationship between sensor and the object. As will be described below, the magnitude(s) of the left and right signals are used to identify the presence of a hidden object and its lateral location relative to the sensor.
  • the hidden object must lie substantially on the locus of points forming an ellipse with foci at the Tx and Rx antennas, wherein the ellipse lies in the plane containing the Tx and Rx antennas and the transmission axis of the Tx antenna.
  • the hidden object can be localized to a unique point in that plane by triangulation.
  • the perpendicular distance from that point to the obstruction is the depth of the object. That is, the path length from the transmitter Tx to a point PI and then to the first receiver Rxl is constant for all points on ellipse El .
  • the path length from the transmitter to a point P2 and then to the second receiver Rx2 is also a constant for all points on ellipse E2.
  • a stud is assumed to be present when the left and right signal magnitudes are substantially equal and above a minimum threshold (the threshold can easily be determined experimentally), and when the measured depth is greater than the expected thickness of the obstruction, but less than, say, 1.5 times that thickness.
  • a hidden object detector must be calibrated before use to remove the effects of the obstruction.
  • this calibration comprises operating the detector over a section of the obstruction believed cover a void.
  • digitized samples of I and Q, for both left and right channels are stored in temporary memory.
  • these stored samples are recalled from memory and subtracted from the data stream before the magnitude and phase calculations are performed. This calibration step not only removes the effect of having a scattered signal coming from the front of the obstruction but also provides a zero phase reference.
  • the measured IF phase is proportional to L D , the total delay path, which is the sum of all the internal delays plus the delay from the Tx antenna to the Rx antenna, this latter delay being the object depth that is the desired measurement.
  • the measured IF phase of Equation (8) has a depth ambiguity. Because of the inherent periodicity of a sinusoidal signal, the measured depth repeats with the RF carrier wavelength, X c , limiting the unambiguous depth measurement to about 1 ⁇ 2 c , where the 1 ⁇ 2 factor accounts for the round trip measurement. In preferred embodiments additional measurement and processing steps are used to resolve this ambiguity.
  • the IF phase is measured at two sampling times.
  • the first sample time is near the beginning of the IF signal and the second is near the end of the IF signal.
  • the phase can be measured at 5 microseconds and 15 microseconds into the 18 microsecond signal.
  • At is the known sample time difference.
  • S l . lxlO 13 hertz/sec
  • T D 3 ⁇ 4 7.2xl0 ⁇ 9 seconds
  • At lxlO "6 seconds.
  • the delay time changes by approximately 0.17xl0 ⁇ 9 seconds.
  • An unambiguous depth measurement can then be calculated by combining the 2.5 centimeter “steps” calculated using Equation (1 1) and the high resolution (but ambiguous) depth calculated using Equation (8).
  • the stud sensor is operated with two slightly different chirped signals.
  • the two chirped signals are processed to increase the unambiguous depth range beyond the 0.5 wave range limit inherent in a single phase angle measurement.
  • the sequence of operations in a two chirp hidden object detector is similar to the one chirp system previously described.
  • a sequence of transmissions using the first chirp signal is followed by a sequence of transmissions using the second chirp signal.
  • the starting RF frequencies of the two chirps are offset from one another by a predetermined value, where that predetermined frequency offset value, F off , is selected to preferably change the RF carrier frequency by between 2 and 10 percent.
  • F off predetermined frequency offset value
  • this percentage change in carrier frequency maps into the same percentage change in the carrier wavelength in Equation (8) and hence the same percentage change in the non-time dependent phase of the IF, also shown in Equation (8).
  • the two chirp detector makes two independent measurements of the depth using slightly different wavelength signals. It is well know in the interferometer and position encoder arts that two such measurements can be combined to disambiguate the periodic ambiguity of either individual measurement. Horwitz et al. provides an example in U.S. Patent No. 6,366,047 wherein three (or more) such measurements are used to create a very long, unambiguous measurement range using very short wavelength signals. In one example embodiment, a simple disambiguation scheme may be used. As shown in Figure 13, the response of each phase estimation process with respect to object depth is a sawtooth. That is, the response is a piecewise linear ramp wherein the ramp resets to zero every time the round trip distance to the object increases by one wavelength of the carrier frequency.
  • sawtooth 510 is the response of a first chirped signal and sawtooth 520 is the response of a second chirped signal with a longer wavelength.
  • Horizontal lines 511 and 521 represent the measured phase values for the two chirped signals for one object distance. Drawing vertical lines from each intersection of sawtooth 510 and line 511 marks the horizontal axis with the possible distances that could have resulted in the particular phase measurement for the first signal. Of course, these distances are separated by multiples of the wavelength of the first chirp signal.
  • the nominal RF frequency is about 5.75 gigahertz and the frequency offset, F 0ff , between the two chirps is ⁇ 100 megahertz, resulting in a percentage wavelength change of about 1.7 percent. Therefore, each change in the delay path of ⁇ 5 centimeters (nominal wavelength) results in a ⁇ 6 degree phase difference between the two IF phase measurements.
  • the hidden object detector where the signal-to-noise ratio of the return signal is less than optimum. In some embodiments, therefore, perform an average on the I and Q IF signals immediately after these signals are digitized.
  • the hidden object detector is employed as a stud finder.
  • Many substantially equivalent user interfaces can be developed to communicate the presence of a stud behind a wall.
  • the user interface comprises a graphical display 190 having three variable length vertical bars, the bars being disposed in a horizontal row. The lengths of the two outer bars are adjusted by the processing electronics to represent the magnitude of the returns in the left and right channels respectively.
  • the central bar is the stud-present indicator. In one embodiment this bar will only illuminate when a stud is in front of the detector. In another embodiment this bar will only be illuminate to, say, one half its maximum length when a stud is in front of the detector.
  • the detector "declares" a stud to be present based on a set of a priori logic rules applied to the measured data by logic module 168.
  • the rule for declaring a stud to be present in front of the detector comprises three parts: first, the left and right channels must have substantially equal magnitude returns;
  • the left and right channels must both have returns substantially greater than a predetermined clutter level;
  • the depth of the scattering object must be approximately equal to typical wallboard thickness.
  • the hidden object detector is capable of sensing the presence of objects other than studs.
  • Additional logic rules may be implemented in logic module 168 to determine that a non-stud object has been detected.
  • a simple modification of the three part "stud-detected" rule may entail: first, the left and right channels must have substantially equal magnitude returns; second, the left and right channels must both have returns substantially greater than a pre-determined clutter level; and third, the depth of the scattering object is greater than typical wallboard thickness by a pre-determined threshold.
  • the graphical interface can be programmed to communicate the presence of a non- stud object by modifying the display used when a stud is present.
  • the lengths of the two outer bars may be adjusted by the processing electronics to represent the magnitude of the returns in the left and right channels respectively, as with a stud but the central bar will be illuminate to, say, its maximum length when a non-stud is in front of the detector, the longer bar representing the fact that the object is further away from the detector.
  • the detector 12 is described as using electromagnetic radiation directed at and received from a hidden object for sensing it presence, in the most general sense this form of radiation is not strictly necessary. Potentially other types of radiating signals, such as acoustic signals for example, could be used.
  • the technique includes directing a transmitted radiating signal in a direction of an obstruction capable of hiding a hidden object, where the transmitted radiating signal includes a chirped signal whose instantaneous frequency increases or decreases substantially linearly during a transmission period, and the instantaneous frequency having a minimum frequency and a maximum frequency.
  • the technique further includes receiving at least one received radiating signal from the direction of the obstruction and using the received radiating signal to generate a received signal for processing, and using a signal processing system to estimate a signal strength and a time delay of the received signal and to generate an indicator signal to drive a user interface, where the time delay is measured relative to an internal reference signal and where the indicator signal is indicative of presence or absence of the hidden object.
  • the time delay, or phase is used to obtain an accurate estimate of the depth (or distance to) the object, and this information along with signal strength information enable very accurate and useful object detection capability.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Length-Measuring Devices Using Wave Or Particle Radiation (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un détecteur d'objet caché qui comprend une source de signal d'émission générant un signal chirp dont la fréquence instantanée varie de manière linéaire durant une période d'émission. Un émetteur est commandé par la source de signal et émet un signal de rayonnement à distance du détecteur vers une obstruction apte à cacher un objet caché. Au moins un récepteur à proximité étroite de l'émetteur reçoit une partie du rayonnement qui est réfléchie en retour vers le détecteur à partir de la direction de l'obstruction. Un système de traitement de signal estime une intensité de signal et un retard temporel du signal reçu, le retard temporel étant mesuré par rapport à un signal de référence interne. Les informations de retard, ou de phase, fournissent une estimation de la distance à l'objet caché qui peut être utilisée en tant que critère de détection. Un signal indicateur, pouvant être utilisé pour commander une interface utilisateur, est également généré, lequel indique la présence ou l'absence de l'objet caché.
PCT/US2012/024317 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Détecteur d'objet caché Ceased WO2012109345A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161462739P 2011-02-08 2011-02-08
US61/462,739 2011-02-08

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012109345A1 true WO2012109345A1 (fr) 2012-08-16

Family

ID=46638943

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/024317 Ceased WO2012109345A1 (fr) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Détecteur d'objet caché

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012109345A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017106861A (ja) * 2015-12-11 2017-06-15 三井造船株式会社 木造構造物検査システム及び木造構造物検査方法
WO2017155449A1 (fr) * 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Husqvarna Ab Dispositif de chantier pour déterminer la présence d'un gradient de densité dans un matériau de travail
CN109765625A (zh) * 2017-10-13 2019-05-17 亚历山大·曼内斯基 用于检查个人的腿以检测欺诈性物体的携带的设备与方法
RU2741868C1 (ru) * 2020-06-10 2021-01-29 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт физики полупроводников им. А.В. Ржанова Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук (ИФП СО РАН) Устройство дистанционного обнаружения скрытых опасных объектов

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2121671C1 (ru) * 1997-01-24 1998-11-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт радиоэлектронных систем" Устройство зондирования строительных конструкций
RU2234694C2 (ru) * 2002-07-10 2004-08-20 Заренков Вячеслав Адамович Устройство зондирования строительных конструкций
US20090212990A1 (en) * 2008-02-19 2009-08-27 Cloutier Paul A Apparatus and method for detecting and locating hidden objects
US7592943B2 (en) * 2004-09-28 2009-09-22 Qinetiq Limited Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar having improved frequency linearity
RU2375729C1 (ru) * 2008-10-06 2009-12-10 Государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Военно-космическая академия имени А.Ф. Можайского Геофизический радиолокатор

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2121671C1 (ru) * 1997-01-24 1998-11-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт радиоэлектронных систем" Устройство зондирования строительных конструкций
RU2234694C2 (ru) * 2002-07-10 2004-08-20 Заренков Вячеслав Адамович Устройство зондирования строительных конструкций
US7592943B2 (en) * 2004-09-28 2009-09-22 Qinetiq Limited Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar having improved frequency linearity
US20090212990A1 (en) * 2008-02-19 2009-08-27 Cloutier Paul A Apparatus and method for detecting and locating hidden objects
RU2375729C1 (ru) * 2008-10-06 2009-12-10 Государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Военно-космическая академия имени А.Ф. Можайского Геофизический радиолокатор

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017106861A (ja) * 2015-12-11 2017-06-15 三井造船株式会社 木造構造物検査システム及び木造構造物検査方法
WO2017155449A1 (fr) * 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Husqvarna Ab Dispositif de chantier pour déterminer la présence d'un gradient de densité dans un matériau de travail
GB2560684A (en) * 2016-03-09 2018-09-19 Husqvarna Ab Construction site device for determining the presence of a density gradient in a working material
US11185938B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2021-11-30 Husqvarna Ab Construction site device for determining the presence of a density gradient in a working material
GB2560684B (en) * 2016-03-09 2021-12-22 Husqvarna Ab Construction site device for determining the presence of a density gradient in a working material
CN109765625A (zh) * 2017-10-13 2019-05-17 亚历山大·曼内斯基 用于检查个人的腿以检测欺诈性物体的携带的设备与方法
CN109765625B (zh) * 2017-10-13 2024-11-29 亚历山大·曼内斯基 用于检查个人的腿以检测欺诈性物体的携带的设备与方法
RU2741868C1 (ru) * 2020-06-10 2021-01-29 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт физики полупроводников им. А.В. Ржанова Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук (ИФП СО РАН) Устройство дистанционного обнаружения скрытых опасных объектов

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7307575B2 (en) Through-the-wall frequency stepped imaging system utilizing near field multiple antenna positions, clutter rejection and corrections for frequency dependent wall effects
US7626400B2 (en) Electromagnetic scanning imager
US7679727B2 (en) Method and system for determining the position of a receiver unit
US7460052B2 (en) Multiple frequency through-the-wall motion detection and ranging using a difference-based estimation technique
US6750960B2 (en) Optical distance measurement device and method thereof
US7355545B2 (en) Through the wall ranging with triangulation using multiple spaced apart radars
CN103430042A (zh) 有无需接触测量设备而作用的基于手势的测量触发的电光测距设备
EP3408683A1 (fr) Phasogrammes optiques pour vibrométrie ladar
CN103885036B (zh) 显示有源雷达图像的方法以及手持筛分设备
US12007464B2 (en) Method for ascertaining at least one physical parameter of a system by exploiting the reflection from a reference object
US11971350B2 (en) Method and THz measuring device for measuring a measurement object using electro-magnetic radiation
US7898456B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting and locating hidden objects
WO2012109345A1 (fr) Détecteur d'objet caché
US20080111729A1 (en) Through the wall ranging with triangulation using multiple spaced apart radars
US8064737B2 (en) Spatial bandwidth imaging of structural interiors
CN109116322A (zh) 一种位移和距离激光雷达系统的回光消除方法
Polivka An overview of microwave sensor technology
US8451162B2 (en) Microwave datum tool
RU160453U1 (ru) 3d георадиотомограф
RU2222031C1 (ru) Способ формирования зондирующих сигналов комплексной локационной системы
EP1711844B1 (fr) Detection de mouvement et determination de distance multifrequence a travers des parois a l'aide d'une technique d'estimation basee sur la difference
RU2190239C1 (ru) Способ и устройство для измерения поляризационной матрицы рассеяния объекта
Illig et al. Optical ranging techniques in turbid waters
RU2092874C1 (ru) Способ обнаружения предметов в земле и устройство для его осуществления (варианты)
JPH11264869A (ja) 誘電率測定方法および誘電率測定装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12745293

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12745293

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1