WO2013135501A1 - Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage - Google Patents

Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013135501A1
WO2013135501A1 PCT/EP2013/054171 EP2013054171W WO2013135501A1 WO 2013135501 A1 WO2013135501 A1 WO 2013135501A1 EP 2013054171 W EP2013054171 W EP 2013054171W WO 2013135501 A1 WO2013135501 A1 WO 2013135501A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
line
time
distance
actual
determined
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2013/054171
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Martin Jung
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG, Siemens Corp filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of WO2013135501A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013135501A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61JSHIFTING OR SHUNTING OF RAIL VEHICLES
    • B61J3/00Shunting or short-distance haulage devices; Similar devices for hauling trains on steep gradients or as starting aids; Car propelling devices therefor
    • B61J3/02Gravity shunting humps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L17/00Switching systems for classification yards
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/02Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or trains
    • B61L25/021Measuring and recording of train speed

Definitions

  • a method for controlling a shunting flow conditioning shunting flow systems are wagon or groups of wagons, which are also known as processes, the acting on the processes gravity from a mountain track groove sorted under ⁇ Zung in different direction tracks. In terms of efficiency and reliability, this usually involves an extensive automation of the operation of the process.
  • a suitable for this purpose automatic control system for example, from the bsuiness public ⁇ lichung "automation system for train formation MSR32 - More efficiency and safety in the transport of goods", Order no .: A19100-V100-B898-V1, Siemens AG 2010 known as part of a route control.
  • the known system has, inter alia, system functions for the early detection of bad-walkers, for running monitoring, for standstill monitoring and for detecting inadmissible wheel sensor messages.
  • the present invention has for its object to provide a particularly efficient method for controlling a technical waste disposal plant, which at the same time ensures high reliability and high maneuvering quality.
  • This object is inventively achieved by a method for controlling a shuntingnostianläge, wherein ⁇ true at least a desired time-distance line be for a flow in the form of a running vehicle or a running carriage group, measured values are recorded, acquired from the Measured values at least one actual-time-distance-line is determined and the drainage system taking into account a comparison the determined at least one actual-time-distance-line is controlled with the at least one desired time-distance-line.
  • At least one desired time-distance line is initially determined for the sequence.
  • this can already be done be ⁇ before the respective flow moves over the civilberg the ranking technicalssenanläge.
  • a train to be disassembled by means of the drainage system to simulate a runtime operation on the basis of a predetermined splitting list, taking into account known properties of the processes in a preparatory phase.
  • ER- optimal humping by the averages preferably can be determined for each of the runs from ⁇ the at least one target time-distance line addition.
  • the determination of at least one target time-distance line usually thus will already be completed before the end of the first to be separated train passes the Berggip- fei the process plant and in the free running becomes ⁇ .
  • measured values are recorded for the sequence or in relation to the sequence. It may be measured values of any kind in recorded measurement ⁇ values. Required here is only that the measured values acquired made a statement about the movement of the flow along the flow system ⁇ union.
  • At least one actual time path line is determined from the detected measured values. This means that the at least ⁇ an actual time-distance line in contrast to the at least a target time-distance line represents the actual movement of each ⁇ ilia flow along the Carnegieanläge.
  • the drainage system is controlled by taking into account a comparison of the determined at least one actual-time-travel-line with the at least one desired time-time-line.
  • a comparison it is advantageously mög ⁇ Lich, deviations between which reflecting in the actual time-way line actual behavior of the respective flow and the expected behavior of the process, that in the at least one target time-way reflecting line early ⁇ time to recognize.
  • the determination of the at least one desired time-path line in the context of the method according to the invention can in principle also take place at least partially in time parallel to the detection of the measured values and for determining the at least one actual-time-path line.
  • the at least one desired time-path line in the context of the method according to the invention can in principle also take place at least partially in time parallel to the detection of the measured values and for determining the at least one actual-time-path line.
  • the at least one desired time-path line in the context of the method according to the invention can in principle also take place at least partially in time parallel to the detection of the measured values and
  • Target time-distance-line is at least partially determined only after the Erfas ⁇ sen of the measured values and determining the at least one actual time-distance-line. In accordance with the foregoing, but it will be generally appropriate, to determine at least one target time-distance line before the eigentli ⁇ chen draining process.
  • the method according to the invention runs continuously in that the acquisition of the measured values, the determination of the at least one actual-time-path line from the acquired measured values, and the comparison of the at least one actual-time-path line with the at least one target time-distance line is performed regularly, while the expiration of the automated range of professionanläge, ie in particular the area between mountain peaks and beginning of each directional track, goes through.
  • the inventive method has the advantage that it allows a timely and consistent monitoring of the running received by processes on their way from the mountain peak to the respective directional track.
  • this is advantageously an early and differentiated reaction possible, which ultimately increases the performance of the drainage system and the reliability and the Shunting quality can be improved.
  • the inventive method is such wei ⁇ ned, and that the at least one target time-distance line un ⁇ ter into account specific to the flow properties is determined.
  • specific properties which are specific to the respective sequence these may be, for example, known running properties, the weight, the type or the number of axes of the respective sequence or the carriage of this sequence.
  • the accuracy of the at least one setpoint time-distance line is advantageously increased in such a way that it has a higher probability of the actual running behavior of the sequence, ie of the at least one actual time-distance line , corresponds.
  • the method according to the invention can furthermore be configured in such a way that tolerances for the running properties of the sequence are taken into account in the determination of the at least one desired time-path line.
  • This offers the advantage that the appropriate tolerances in the control the RangierÜschanläge, especially in the Laufweg horrung, can be considered.
  • the measured values can in principle be detected by means of any known sensor devices. Is required hierbe only that the measured values thus acquired ermögli ⁇ chen to determine an actual time-distance line for the process.
  • the measured values are recorded by means of rail contacts. This is advantageous because under the control of shunting hump yards for free indication of track sections and to determine the overall speed of the processes usually anyway Schienenkon ⁇ contacts are provided.
  • the rail contacts used to acquire the measured values which are also referred to as wheel sensors on account of their reaction to individual wheels, can in this case operate according to any active principle known per se. Thus, this includes in particular mechanically, hyd ⁇ raulisch, pneumatically, magnetically or inductively acting a rail contacts.
  • the method according to the invention is embodied such that the further running behavior of the sequence is predicted on the basis of the comparison of the at least one actual time path line with the at least one desired time path line.
  • a corresponding prognosis can in the consequence For example, it may be necessary to determine which control measures are required to minimize the risk of incursions, which could lead, inter alia, to wrongdoers or cornerstones of successive operations.
  • the corresponding controlling measures can in particular be designed to keep the distances of successive processes sufficiently large enough.
  • the actual time-distance-line will usually develop in the desired direction, ie approach the target time-distance-line.
  • a modified setpoint time-distance line is determined and used in the sequence for comparison with the actual time-distance line.
  • a setpoint time path line is at least for the first and the last axis of the process be ⁇ true.
  • the method according to the invention can also be developed in such a way that an actual time-distance line is determined from the detected measured values at least for the first and the last axis of the sequence.
  • an actual time-distance line is determined from the detected measured values at least for the first and the last axis of the sequence.
  • it is also expedient with regard to the actual time path line at least the first and the last axis of the respective Ab ⁇ run in monitoring the wornVerhaltens the respective Process to be considered.
  • further corrections can also be taken into account when determining the at least one actual time-time path line.
  • the inventive method can also be embodied such that the flow system with further taken into ⁇ Dannung at least an actual time-distance curve of the Ab ⁇ run leading end precursor is controlled.
  • the inventive method can be further configured such that the draining assembly under wide ⁇ rer into account at least a desired time-distance line ei ⁇ nes trailing the drain follower is controlled.
  • the further consideration of at least one setpoint-time-path-line of a follower also makes it possible to further increase the operational safety and maneuvering quality of the process applications.
  • Controlling the flow system taking into account of the comparison of the determined at least an actual time-distance line with the at least one target time-distance line may comprise different ⁇ market measures. This includes, for example, setting protective guards.
  • controlling the drainage system comprises controlling at least one rail brake and / or the withdrawal speed. This is advantageous because the measures mentioned are those which allow a direct influence on the speed of processes and thus a direct influence on the actual time-distance-line of the processes.
  • the invention further comprises a control device for a rangiertechnische flow system having means for imple ⁇ out the method according to the invention or with means for carrying out the method according to one of the aforementioned preferred embodiments of the inventive method.
  • FIG. 1 shows in a longitudinal section a schematic sketch of a conventional sorting system
  • FIG. 2 shows exemplary speed-distance lines as well as time-distance lines of sequences
  • Figure 3 for explaining an embodiment of the method according to the invention a comparison of actual-time-distance-lines and target-time-distance-lines of successive processes.
  • FIG. 1 shows, in a longitudinal section, a schematic sketch of a customary technical procedure.
  • the inclination is shown as a function of the traversed route for a longitudinal section of a drainage system 10.
  • the drainage system 10 has along the path a steep ramp or steep slope 11, to which an intermediate slope 12, a distribution zone or switch ⁇ horizontal 13 and directional tracks 14 follow in the direction.
  • the course of the belt is from ⁇ conveyorized system indicated 20 with switches 21 to 26.
  • game as seen in ⁇ that the operations within the zone Ver ⁇ part 13 by means of Verteil Hughes 24, 25 and 26 on ver ⁇ different direction tracks can be distributed.
  • the position of rail brakes in the form of a hill brake 31, a valley brake 32 and a directional brake 33 is shown only partially shown.
  • the track brakes 31, 32 and 33 serve in particular to influence the speed of processes in the form of running car or wagon groups such that on the one hand a high mountain power, ie a large number of processes per unit time is achieved and on the other hand, the required reliability and Ranging quality can be ensured.
  • FIG. 2 shows speed-path lines and time-path lines of processes.
  • speed-distance lines in the form of the course of the speed v of processes as a function of the distance or of the location s are shown.
  • time-distance lines are shown for three consecutive sequences. This refers the curves 120 and 121 on the first and last axis of a crop rotor, the curves 130, 131 on the first be ⁇ or last axis of a bad runner and the curves ⁇ ven 140, 141 in turn on the first or last axis of a crop rotor.
  • a clash of successive processes by a corresponding control ofonneanläge in particular by a corresponding variation of the Abdrück Norwegian and a corresponding control of the hill brake 31 and the valley brake 32, is advantageously avoided.
  • FIG. 3 shows a comparison of actual time travel lines and desired time travel lines of successive processes.
  • reference time-time lines 210 and 211 shown in dashed lines can be seen for a sequence.
  • the setpoint time-distance line 210 relates to the first or foremost axis of the relevant sequence and the setpoint time-distance line 211 to the last or rearmost axis of the relevant sequence.
  • the corresponding desired time-distance lines 210 and 211 can now be determined in a first step for the relevant sequence. This can, for example, time ⁇ Lich decoupled from the actual process flow of the relevant sequence, for example as part of a simulation of for the dismantling of a train to be carried out operations, done.
  • the reference time-distance lines 210 and 211 take into account tolerances for the running properties of the process as well as specific properties for the respective process. Preferably, this is done so that the target time-path line 210 takes into account positive tolerances for the early arrival of waypoints with the first axis and the target time-distance line 211 correspondingly negative tolerances for the late achievement of Way ⁇ points with the last axis.
  • ER may be averages of the measures related to the in a possible conflict situation - in the form of an impending corner kick - involved procedures are needed to defuse the conflict in question or to ver ⁇ avoid or at least the corresponding risk for the To minimize the conflict situation.
  • dashed target time-distance lines are continued for a "precursor" to the observed flow 200 and 201 and solid actual time-distance lines 202 and 203
  • Darge ⁇ provides that each turn on said first Bezie ⁇ hung example relate last axle of the precursor. in towards ⁇ from 220 and 221 as well as solid actual time-distance lines 222, 223 are for a the considered sequence subsequent "trailer", the respective dashed target time-way lines shown.
  • the actual time path line 203 as well as the reference time path line 220 related to the first axis of the follower. If it should already be available in its beginnings at the given time, it can also be used for the follower the actual time-distance line 222 is taken into account, thereby enabling an even more efficient control of the sequence operation.
  • the described method can also be used already in the area in front of the valley brake 32.
  • the comparison of the ascertained at least one actual time path line 212, 213 with the at least one desired time path line 210, 211 can already begin immediately behind the summit at the beginning of the free run of the process.
  • the applied Steue ⁇ approximation method leads in the embodiment shown means that an overlap of time-distance lines of different processes that anzei- a touch different processes gene could, up to a distance or a location of about 320 m is reliably avoided. Only after that, with regard to the secondary process, is there an overlap of at least the setpoint time path line 211, ie the setpoint time path line for the last axis of the process, and the actual time path Line 220 of the first axis of the Nachrucrs. However, this is not critical in the present case, since the last relevant place for the separation of the processes is at the last turnout.
  • the described method has the advantage that during the sequence operation problems rela ⁇ hung as risks with high accuracy can be identified.
  • This makes it possible to intervene at an early stage in the operation of the drainage system in the event that the comparison of the at least one actual-time-way-line 212, 213 with the at least one setpoint-time-travel-line 210, 211 shows a critical deviation of the running behavior of the respective sequence from the expected behavior.
  • the Auslaufge ⁇ speed has to be reduced from a rail brake for a subsequent procedure to what value to rela ⁇ hung as the specific risk to avoid the particular hazard.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
PCT/EP2013/054171 2012-03-12 2013-03-01 Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage Ceased WO2013135501A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE201210203812 DE102012203812A1 (de) 2012-03-12 2012-03-12 Verfahren zum Steuern einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage
DE102012203812.4 2012-03-12

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013135501A1 true WO2013135501A1 (fr) 2013-09-19

Family

ID=47833051

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2013/054171 Ceased WO2013135501A1 (fr) 2012-03-12 2013-03-01 Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage

Country Status (2)

Country Link
DE (1) DE102012203812A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2013135501A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016218460A1 (de) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche
DE102017201266A1 (de) * 2017-01-26 2018-07-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche Anlage
DE102017207646A1 (de) * 2017-05-05 2018-11-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche Anlage
EP4328113A1 (fr) * 2022-08-26 2024-02-28 Siemens Mobility GmbH Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation de triage par gravité et dispositif de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
EP4328112A1 (fr) * 2022-08-26 2024-02-28 Siemens Mobility GmbH Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation de triage par gravité et dispositif de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080173771A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2008-07-24 James Michael Kiss System, method, and computer software code for determining rail characteristics of a piece of railroad rolling stock
DE102007040758A1 (de) * 2007-08-29 2009-04-09 Ais Automation Dresden Gmbh Verfahren zum Steuern von Richtungsgleisbremsen

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080173771A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2008-07-24 James Michael Kiss System, method, and computer software code for determining rail characteristics of a piece of railroad rolling stock
DE102007040758A1 (de) * 2007-08-29 2009-04-09 Ais Automation Dresden Gmbh Verfahren zum Steuern von Richtungsgleisbremsen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102012203812A1 (de) 2013-09-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3713808B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
EP2718165B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner une installation de triage technique et dispositif de commande pour une telle installation
EP2720926B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
EP2825430A2 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un système d'entraînement et de freinage d'un véhicule, comportant un frein à friction
WO2013135501A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage
EP3230147B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
EP3230148B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
EP3544876B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation
DE2944571C2 (de) Einrichtung zum Optimieren der Bergleistung einer Ablaufanlage
DE102007040758B4 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern von Richtungsgleisbremsen
EP3592624B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation
AT390927B (de) Verfahren zum steuern von gleisbremsen in eisenbahnrangieranlagen
DE3024384A1 (de) Verfahren zur zielbremsung von antriebslosen schienenfahrzeugen
DE102004048993B4 (de) System und Verfahren zur Steuerung von schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen, insbesondere von Zügen, mittels einer Steuerzentrale, in Abhängigkeit vom Zustand des Fahrwegs, insbesondere des verfügbaren Reibwertes
EP2619066A2 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage du trafic ferroviaire ainsi que dispositif de commande pour une telle installation de triage
EP3299249B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation technique de triage ainsi que dispositif de commande pour une telle installation technique de triage
CH453419A (de) Steuervorrichtung für eine Gleisbremseneinrichtung eines Rangierbahnhofes
DE2654669C3 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern von Talbremsen in Ablauf anlagen
DE19531019A1 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern von Gleisbremsen mit Geschwindigkeitsmessung, insbesondere über Doppelkontakte
DE102011088891A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erhöhung der Haltegenauigkeit eines bewegten Objektes
DE2852784A1 (de) Verfahren zum steuern von talbremsen in eisenbahnablaufanlagen
EP4686639A1 (fr) Procédé de commande assistée par ordinateur de l'expiration de séquences
DE1605342C (de) Steuereinrichtung fur eine Gleisbrem se
DE2912748A1 (de) Verfahren zum bestimmen der zulaessigen anrueckgeschwindigkeit fernsteuerbarer rangierloks beim zulauf auf den ablaufberg einer rangieranlage
DE3040581C2 (de) Steuereinrichtung zum Beeinflussen von spurgebundenen Fahrzeugen in Ablaufanlagen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13707845

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13707845

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1