WO2014145711A1 - Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer une performance physique - Google Patents

Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer une performance physique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014145711A1
WO2014145711A1 PCT/US2014/030520 US2014030520W WO2014145711A1 WO 2014145711 A1 WO2014145711 A1 WO 2014145711A1 US 2014030520 W US2014030520 W US 2014030520W WO 2014145711 A1 WO2014145711 A1 WO 2014145711A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user
performance
score
athlete
ready
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2014/030520
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Vincent Ned Stephenson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MOVEMENT TRAINING SYSTEMS LLC
Original Assignee
MOVEMENT TRAINING SYSTEMS LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US13/843,211 external-priority patent/US9025824B2/en
Application filed by MOVEMENT TRAINING SYSTEMS LLC filed Critical MOVEMENT TRAINING SYSTEMS LLC
Priority to GB1518100.1A priority Critical patent/GB2527460B/en
Priority to AU2014232710A priority patent/AU2014232710A1/en
Priority to CA2909514A priority patent/CA2909514A1/fr
Publication of WO2014145711A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014145711A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
    • A63B24/0003—Analysing the course of a movement or motion sequences during an exercise or trainings sequence, e.g. swing for golf or tennis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H1/00—Apparatus for passive exercising; Vibrating apparatus; Chiropractic devices, e.g. body impacting devices, external devices for briefly extending or aligning unbroken bones
    • A61H1/02—Stretching or bending or torsioning apparatus for exercising
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1118—Determining activity level
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
    • A61B5/1128—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique using image analysis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/74—Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient; User input means
    • A61B5/7475—User input or interface means, e.g. keyboard, pointing device, joystick
    • A61B5/748—Selection of a region of interest, e.g. using a graphics tablet
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
    • A63B24/0062—Monitoring athletic performances, e.g. for determining the work of a user on an exercise apparatus, the completed jogging or cycling distance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
    • G16H20/30—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
    • A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
    • A61H2201/5023—Interfaces to the user
    • A61H2201/5043—Displays
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
    • A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
    • A61H2201/5058—Sensors or detectors
    • A61H2201/5092—Optical sensor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
    • A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
    • A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
    • A61H2201/5097—Control means thereof wireless

Definitions

  • the embodiments described herein are related to systems and methods for performance training based on position tracking, movement mechanics and functional strength development, as well as systems and methods for evaluating and improving physical performance.
  • Athletes often employ various training systems and/or methods to improve athletic performance.
  • Such training systems and/or methods can be divided into at least two groups.
  • One such group includes training systems and methods which are primarily aimed at improving or maintaining the physical conditioning of the athlete.
  • Such athletic conditioning training systems and methods are generally configured to improve or maintain the strength and stamina of the athlete.
  • An example of a conditioning training system is a set of weights for weightlifting.
  • an example of a conditioning training method is a method of using such weights to increase strength and stamina of an athlete.
  • the other of the two groups of athletic training systems and methods includes systems and methods that are aimed primarily at improving or maintaining an athletic technique.
  • “technique” refers to the manner in which an athlete executes an athletic maneuver such as running, jumping, throwing, and the like.
  • Such athletic technique training systems and methods are generally configured to improve or maintain an athlete's form, body positioning, and movement while performing an athletic maneuver.
  • the technique possessed by an athlete can be as important, if not more important, than the strength and/or stamina of the athlete. For example, assuming all other factors are equal, an athlete of inferior conditioning and stamina who possesses superior technique can sometimes out-perform an athlete of superior conditioning and stamina who possesses inferior technique. Superior athletic technique, then, can be a determining factor in the outcome of any given athletic event such as a game or other competition.
  • the training systems which improve or maintain an athletic technique primarily use physical sensors which are placed on the body of the athlete in order to measure the athlete's movement and position.
  • the sensors may provide visual tracking of the movement and position to an image capture device or provide actual data on movement and position via components within the sensors which are equipped to measure movement and position.
  • the use of these sensors limits the applicability of these training systems to environments where the sensors can be attached to the user or where specialized equipment is available to read the data generated by the sensors.
  • the training system may require a specially-designed space, thus limiting the applicability to athletes who are engaged in normal training that is on a field, outdoors or with a team.
  • Systems and methods are provided for evaluating and correcting physical performance of an activity by a human.
  • a user performing one or more physical activities may be evaluated based on criteria relating to their movement, such as strength and technique.
  • the user's performance in relation to these criteria is then rated, and the values for the criteria are combined to provide an overall performance score.
  • the performance score is used to determine a user's overall readiness and ability to perform the physical activity which was evaluated or an overall ability to perform physical activities.
  • Performance scores for more than one physical activity may be combined to provide an overall performance ready score that captures the person's overall physical ability.
  • Comparisons of performance scores over time may provide information as to whether a user is improving or regressing, and could be specifically applied to evaluating physical rehabilitations from injuries or targeted types of training activities and techniques. Corrections to a user's technique can also be offered based on the specific rating the user received with regard to technique.
  • a method of assessing performance readiness of a human comprises: receiving at least one image of a user performing a physical activity; evaluating a technique of the user' s performance and determining a technique score based on the evaluation; determining a strength score based on the user's measured strength during the physical activity; combining the technique score and the strength score to generate a performance ready score; and displaying the performance ready score on a display.
  • a method of assessing a physical rehabilitation process of a human comprises: generating a first performance ready score for a user, wherein the performance ready scores measures an ability of a user to perform a physical activity; generating a second performance ready score for the user after the user has been physically impaired or injured; comparing the first performance ready score and the second performance ready score to determine a difference between the first performance ready score and the second performance ready score; and determining a progress of a rehabilitation process of the user based on the determined difference.
  • An image capture device such as a still camera or video camera captures an image or video of a human body in a selected position or sequence of positions relating to a movement.
  • the position or movement may relate to a physical activity, such as running, jumping, throwing or swinging.
  • the image is then presented to a user on a display, where the user may select one or more positions of the human body for analysis.
  • an angle of the position is determined and then compared to a desired angle determined through specific biomechanical measurements. The difference between the two angles is calculated, and the user is then presented with feedback, such as a corrective action, to aid the user in reducing the difference between the measured angle and the desired angle.
  • a system for analyzing a position of a human body comprises an image capture device which captures an image of a human body; a user interaction unit where a user selects a position of the human body on the captured image; a comparison unit which determines an angle of the human body at the selected position and calculates a difference between an angle of the selected position and a desired angle of the selected position; and a display unit which displays feedback based on the calculated difference.
  • a method for training a human body comprises capturing at least one image of a human body; selecting at least one position of the human body in the captured image; determining an angle of the human body at the selected at least one position; calculating a difference between the angle of the human body at the at least one selected position and a desired angle of the at least one selected position; and displaying feedback based on the calculated difference on a display.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of a system for analyzing position and movement in accordance with one embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of data flow in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 3 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a first sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 4 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a first sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 5 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a first sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 6 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a first sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 7 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a second sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 8 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a second sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 9 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a second sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 10 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a second sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment.
  • Figure 11 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a third sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 12 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a third sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 13 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a third sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 14 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a third sprinting position in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 15 is an exemplary screen shot of a comparison table for comparing the measurements of multiple athletes over the course of several training sessions, in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figures 16A - 16D illustrate the steps of calculating an angle of a forearm during a bench press in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figures 17A - 17C illustrate the steps of calculating an angle of an upper arm during the bench press in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 18A is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a method of calculating the angle of a front foot as it strikes the ground in accordance with one embodiment.
  • Figure 18B is an exemplary screen shot illustrating a method of calculating the angle of a recovery leg in accordance with one embodiment.
  • Figure 19A is a block representation of a computer system and a user in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 19B is a functional block diagram illustrating the computer system of Figure 18A;
  • Figure 20 is a flowchart which illustrates a method of movement training in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 21 is an image of a user interface for evaluating physical performance, in accordance with one embodiment
  • Figure 22 is a table displaying past and present technique, strength and performance readiness data for a list of users performing a bench press activity, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 23 a table displaying an overall performance readiness rating for a list of users, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 24 is an image of a message board user interface where a trainer can communicate with the user regarding specific techniques, performance readiness and corrective actions relating to the evaluation of the user's physical activity;
  • Figure 25 is a flowchart illustrating a method of evaluating a physical activity of a user to determine a performance ready score, according to one embodiment;
  • Figure 26 illustrates a real-time feedback system for evaluating and updating a workout plan, according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 27 illustrates a method of assessing a user's performance, according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • Embodiments in accordance with the systems and methods described herein measure specific positions and movements of the human body, and provide data and visual information to system users (coach, trainer, athlete) to assist the athlete to make corrections in movement and body position.
  • the system utilizes an image capture device such as a camera or video camera to measure movement and body position at a specific point in time without requiring the athlete to wear any sensors.
  • Systems and methods are also provided for evaluating and correcting physical performance of an activity by a human.
  • a user performing one or more physical activities may be evaluated based on criteria relating to their movement, such as strength and technique.
  • the user's performance in relation to these criteria is then rated, and the values for the criteria are combined to provide an overall performance score.
  • the performance score is used to determine a user's overall readiness and ability to perform the physical activity which was evaluated or an overall ability to perform physical activities.
  • Performance scores for more than one physical activity may be combined to provide an overall performance ready score that captures the person's overall physical ability.
  • Comparisons of performance scores over time may provide information as to whether a user is improving or regressing, and could be specifically applied to evaluating physical rehabilitations from injuries or targeted types of training activities and techniques. Corrections to a user's technique can also be offered based on the specific rating the user received with regard to technique
  • the system is a functional training tool.
  • the purpose of a functional training tool is to improve performance. Therefore, all training that improves performance is by definition functional. Using specific functional training exercises will help an athlete's body focus on development of movement skills, body positions, and explosive power.
  • Movement mechanics are employed to teach an athlete how to improve athletic movement.
  • the flow of muscle reaction from the foot through the entire body, and the relationship of the upper body to the lower body is measured. Such measurements allow an athlete to make corrections to existing movement mechanics to improve motion, strength, speed and athleticism.
  • the strengths and weaknesses of the individual athlete may be evaluated and drills created to cue changes for each athlete and improve athletic performance.
  • the first component to consider in movement mechanics is posture. If postural carriage of the body is compromised, so is the quality of the movement. Accordingly, it is necessary to train the upper body, hips and foot to be properly positioned throughout a movement or sequence of movements. This requires proper development of all relevant muscle groups, including the muscles of the lower leg, upper leg, and hips.
  • Timing is critical to this development process.
  • the muscle system must contract, stabilize and create the necessary rotations to produce motion all in one action that maintains proper body position, readying the body for each successive action.
  • the systems and methods described herein may also be applied to analyzing and improving any type of movement by a human body, such a patient undergoing physical therapy to improve movement as a result of an injury or disease.
  • a human body such as a patient undergoing physical therapy to improve movement as a result of an injury or disease.
  • the system could be applied to a patient who has undergone knee surgery and needs to improve the movement of the knee. The system will then capture and analyze the patient's position and movement of the knee in order to determine whether the patient can move the knee as expected or whether the patient is making progress in increasing the movement of the knee.
  • a system for analyzing a position of a human body is provided, as illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • the system 100 will include an image capture device 102, such as a still camera or video camera, which will capture the images or videos of the human body of an athlete or other subject.
  • the image capture device 102 may be integrated into a portable electronic device such as a cellular phone, smart phone or tablet, and the portable electronic device may be capable of carrying out other aspects of the system, as will be described further herein.
  • the image capture device 102 captures an image, video or sequence of images of an athlete performing some type of movement.
  • the captured image or video is then transmitted to a user interaction unit 104, such as a computer with a processor, memory and display, for processing and interaction with the user.
  • a user interaction unit 104 such as a computer with a processor, memory and display
  • the images or videos are uploaded to a comparison unit 106 which may store the images or videos on a remote server 108 and provide calculations regarding the angles of the user's body in comparison with a desired angle.
  • the images and the calculations may then be provided to a user over a web-based interface produced by the user interaction unit 104.
  • the user interaction unit 104 provides a graphical user interface (GUI) (see FIG. 2) on an integrated or connected display unit 110 which displays the image or video so that the user can view and select a position on the human body.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • An input device 112 such as a mouse, keyboard, touch screen, voice recognition, etc. will allow the user to interact with the GUI.
  • the image capture device 102, the user interaction unit 104, the display unit 110 and the input device 112 may be integrated into a single portable device 114 such as a tablet, laptop or smart phone.
  • a single portable device 114 such as a tablet, laptop or smart phone.
  • the GUI may provide the user with instructions on which position to select based on the type of activity that the athlete was engaged in.
  • the GUI may also direct the user to select positions in a sequence of images so that the movement over the course of a time interval during which the images were taken may be determined, as will be described further below.
  • a position is selected by selecting two points on the human body which is then highlighted on the display with a straight line between the two points.
  • the comparison unit 106 computes an angle of the position and compares the angle to a desired angle of that selected position.
  • the angle may be relative to another part of the body or the ground surface, or even an object which the athlete is holding - such as a ball, bat, golf club, hockey stick, etc.
  • the desired angle may be stored in a database within a memory of the comparison unit 106, with the values of various angles determined using known biomechanical measurements and parameters for a variety of activities.
  • the comparison unit 106 then calculates a difference between an angle of the selected position and the desired angle of the selected position.
  • a display unit 110 may then display a corrective action to the user based on the calculated difference.
  • the corrective action may be as simple as the calculated difference in the angles (i.e. - 15 degrees), such that the athlete can understand the correction that is needed simply from the value of the difference.
  • the corrective action may be more specific or practical, such as recommending that a runner further extend a foot or that a weightlifter further bend their knees. Regardless of the type of information provided, the corrective action is intended to help the athlete attain the desired angle of the selected position.
  • the display unit is a portable device such as a laptop, tablet or smart phone, the same portable device may be used to capture the image or video, select the positions and display the corrective actions.
  • the system 100 may include a database or data cloud 116 at the remote server 108 of possible outcomes for various exercises.
  • the data can be generated using the comparison unit 106.
  • the comparison unit 106 can include a computer simulation tool, previously run for a range of test cases (e.g., other athletes).
  • data cloud 116 uses input parameters and presents them directly to the comparison unit 106 for analysis. In such a situation, the analysis is for the particular athlete, using only the particular athlete's performance.
  • a database includes succinct data information.
  • a data cloud includes succinct data information as well as tools to manipulate the data, e.g., algorithms, to derive secondary information, e.g., such as by interpolation.
  • Both of these types of data storage, database or data cloud can be referred to generally as a datastore.
  • the database or data cloud 116 can contain some or all possible combinations of corrections for various exercises of interest and individual athlete considerations.
  • the data cloud 114 may be populated for a specific athlete, using athlete data such as information measured by the athlete in performing a specific exercise.
  • the data cloud 116 may be populated by the athlete himself using a display 118 such as a monitor.
  • the display 118 is generated by the display unit 110 of the system 100 to set up the exercise technique or enter the measured exercise parameters.
  • the display 118 and display unit 110 may include the user interaction unit 104 as well as the hardware needed to implement the user interaction unit 104.
  • the data associated with the selected exercise would then be used to extract the associated outcome in the data cloud 116.
  • the comparison unit 106 and/or data base or data cloud 116 can be located on the same portable device 114 as the display unit 110.
  • the comparison unit 106 and/or data base or data cloud 116 can be located on a different computer system from the viewer system, as shown in FIG. 1 with the remote server 108.
  • Exemplary embodiments of the computer systems which may be embodied by the image capture device 102, the user interaction unit 104, the comparison unit 106 or the portable device 114 as a whole are shown in FIGs. 18A and 18B.
  • the system allows the athlete to determine what adjustment should be made to his or her form, e.g., stance, positioning, etc., by interacting with the controls on the left panel with the display changing to indicate the required corrections to form based on information provided by the user.
  • One benefit of the embodiment is that the athlete is not required to wear any sensors or even perform the activity in a certain setting configured with sensors to measure movement or motion.
  • a video or image of the athlete may be taken in any setting, such as during a team practice, at a gym, etc., and the video can be immediately uploaded from the portable device 114 to the remote server 108 which processes the video and provides the GUI for the user to select positions. This process is designed to take only a few seconds or minutes, depending on whether the video is uploaded from the image capture device 102 or is first transferred to another computer (not shown) which is connected to the remote server 108 through a network. The analysis can then be immediately displayed to the user on the display 118.
  • the user is therefore able to obtain near real-time feedback on the athlete's movement and provide that feedback to the athlete during a training session or practice, so that the athlete can make immediate corrections.
  • the system can significantly improve the benefits of a practice or training session and reduce the amount of time needed for an athlete to improve movement mechanics and athletic performance.
  • the initial level of an athlete's ability is measured, e.g., by measuring the athlete's performance in completing an athletic task. Recommendations are then made to the user or athlete on how to improve performance. The athlete's performance is then measured again in order to determine the improvement the athlete achieved.
  • the performance of the athlete may be measured through the angles of movement, strength measurements, speed measurements and even lean muscle mass measurements.
  • the data being collected during the training sessions and the use of the system is also valuable for other reasons.
  • the data on how quickly an athlete improves over the course of numerous training sessions can be used to model a predicted course of improvement for an athlete over a period of time. For example, if data from other athletes is modeled, the system can provide expected goals for a future athlete to attain at certain steps in the process based on the previous improvements of other athletes utilizing the system.
  • This analytical application will help a user (such as a coach, trainer or the athlete) determine whether the athlete is improving his or her movement along a normal pace, a slower pace or a faster pace. A coach may be able to determine whether an athlete has been completing a recommended schedule of training or whether an athlete may be more skilled than others, and adjustments can then be made to the training regimen.
  • the data collected from the use of the system may be compiled to also assess the effectiveness of a particular type of training activity.
  • the degree of improvement of the athletes in response to different types of training programs may be analyzed to determine if one training program is more effective than another in improving the athletes' movement and performance.
  • the system may analyze and assess movement of a foot. Creating proprioreceptive activity to the necessary muscles to initiate motion is a primary component to the timing of muscle reaction. If the foot does not function correctly, neither will movement. Therefore, many types of movement essentially begin in the foot. Based on this premise, it is evident that training the muscular use of the foot is critical. Using thermographic photos of functional reaction on the soles of the feet during gait, drills can then be established that train a functional muscle response in the feet. Due to years of compensation, many athletes fall inside on the feet, walk on the outsides of the feet, or lean back or forward due to a lack of stability on the mid foot.
  • the present systems and methods facilitate improvement in an athlete's functional strength, which is necessary to produce the power, balanced speed and quickness required for optimal performance.
  • the present systems and methods facilitate improvement in an athlete's functional strength, which is necessary to produce the power, balanced speed and quickness required for optimal performance.
  • just being able to move a lot of weight in the gym will not necessarily transfer to use of that strength on the field or court.
  • FIGs. 3-14 illustrate actions performed by the viewer system.
  • references to anatomy are intended to be references to representations in the system 100 (e.g., underlying data).
  • the athlete or user launches the software application for movement training, also referred to interchangeably as movement training application described in further detail in FIGs. 18A and 18B.
  • the movement training application of the comparison unit produces the GUI see on the display 118.
  • the movement training application receives data from database 116, which may be produced by the comparison unit 106.
  • the movement training application may be launched from a desktop icon, and run locally from the portable device 114, the user's computer, tablet, smart phone, or other electronic device. Alternatively, the movement training application may be accessed via the internet, and run on the remote server 108.
  • the display or screen 118 Upon launching the movement training application, the display or screen 118 displays a preloaded case representing a model athlete. Alternatively, data on a specific athlete could be loaded at this point. This specific athlete data may be loaded by the user or athlete by selecting, e.g., a previously recorded video of the athlete. The athlete data, regardless of source is the starting point for the rest of the movement training analysis. This athlete data, combined with measured parameters obtained from the data, determines the outputs displayed.
  • FIG. 3 in a first step, the user plays a previously recorded video or sequence of images of an athlete performing a predetermined exercise.
  • FIGs. 3-14 all relate to an athlete participating in a 40-yard sprint.
  • the movement training application presents the user with various instructions which ensure that the user makes certain measurements at predesignated times. For example, in FIG. 3, the user is instructed to "Stop the video at foot strike.” Thus, the user should click on the stop button 210 once the athlete's foot touches the ground in the video.
  • a message is displayed on the screen 118 which instructs the user to "First draw a line from the middle of your hip straight down through the protractor.”
  • the user is able to draw a line on the screen with an input device 112, such as by clicking a mouse on a spot where the line should begin and dragging the mouse to a spot where the line should end.
  • a protractor may, in some embodiments, be built into the screen as a border 310 for the video to aid in identifying the line that should be drawn. This line from the hip is illustrated as numeral 320.
  • a message is displayed on the screen 118 to instruct the user to "Enter the number of degrees between the lines in box A.”
  • Box A is a first input field and is represented by numeral 510.
  • the movement training software may be programmed to determine the slope of the lines and convert them to degrees, which can then be subtracted to determine the difference between the angle of the athlete's body part and that of the desired angle.
  • Box A is one of the controls on the left panel 505, for which the user interacts with to determine how to improve the athlete's performance. Also included in left panel 505 are Box B 520 and Box C 530, which are also input fields, and the following buttons: Clear 540, Directions 550, Example 560 and Submit 570.
  • Clear button 540 clears the input values in boxes 510, 520 and 530.
  • Directions button 550 provides user interface directions allowing the user to input personal performance data onto a film clip of the user running or performing prescribed lifts (e.g., instructs user on how/where to draw lines and compute protractor degrees to insert into data input spaces on page).
  • Example button 560 provides visual examples of proper or optimal technique with respect to running or the prescribed lifts. In some embodiments, example button 560 is replaced by a corrections button (e.g., on the user account version), similarly providing visual examples of proper or optimal technique.
  • Submit button 570 submits the entered values from Boxes A-C, 510-530.
  • the user is able to determine the difference between lines 320, 410 by looking at the angle measurements on the protractor and subtracting one from the other and entering the absolute value of the difference in Box A 510.
  • the difference in degrees between lines 320 and 410 is 9.
  • the measurement automatically appears on the screen when the user finishes drawing the second line.
  • the movement training software may be programmed to determine the slope of the lines and convert them to degrees, which can then be subtracted to determine the difference between the angle of the athlete's body part and that of the desired angle.
  • the user is informed that he is going to check the distance between the athlete's foot and COM. This is intended to give the user a good idea of how much power the athlete is generating with each stride.
  • the user is instructed "Stop the video when your heel comes off the ground.” The rear heel of the athlete is identified by line 610.
  • FIG. 8 in a sixth step, the user is instructed to "Draw a line from the center of your hip straight down through the protractor.” This is similar to the task done in FIG. 4. This line from the hip is illustrated as numeral 720.
  • FIG. 9 in a seventh step, the user in instructed to "Next draw a line from the center of the hip through the ball of the foot on the ground.” This is similar to the task done in FIG. 5. This line from the hip through the foot is illustrated as numeral 810.
  • the user is informed that he is going to measure the difference in degrees between the two lines he has drawn 720, 810.
  • the user is instructed "Enter the number of degrees between the two lines in box B.”
  • the user is able to determine the difference between lines 720, 810 by looking at the angle measurements on the protractor and subtracting one from the other and entering the absolute value of the difference in Box B 520.
  • the difference in degrees between lines 720, 810 was 4.
  • the measurement automatically appears on the screen when the user finishes drawing the second line.
  • a ninth step the user is informed that he is going to check the angle of the athlete's push.
  • the user is instructed to "Stop the video at extension. Draw a line from the toe of the foot coming off the ground, up just in front of the knee, through the protractor.” This line from the toe is illustrated as numeral 1010.
  • the user is instructed to "Enter the number of degrees between the two lines in box C.”
  • the user is able to determine the difference between lines 1010, 1110 by looking at the angle measurements on the protractor and subtracting one from the other and entering the absolute value of the difference in Box C 530.
  • the difference in degrees between lines 1010, 1110 was 38.
  • the measurement automatically appears on the screen when the user finishes drawing the second line.
  • the user is instructed at box 1402 to "Click on Submit to get your feedback.” Thereafter, the movement training application provides the user with information in a feedback area 1404 related to measurements made by the user in FIGs. 3-13. For example, in FIGs. 3-6, foot strike was examined, in FIGs. 7-10, foot action was examined, and in FIGs. 11-13, angle of push was examined. Thus, the information provided to the user in this example relates to these three items. As shown in FIG.
  • the output provided to the user in the feedback area 1404 is as follows: "Foot strike in good position for max stride length; Foot action early, loss of power output; Angle of push is good, max stride length.” While shown in the same screen as the instructions, the output of the movement training application may be provided in a separate screen. In some embodiments, output includes information (e.g., actions/drills) required for or desirable for making corrections.
  • information e.g., actions/drills
  • the user or athlete will be able to click on the various outputs or conclusions supplied by the movement training application and get a more detailed analysis.
  • the performance of each of the items examined may be rated on scale (e.g., such a 1 to 100), the user or athlete can monitor and aim to improve.
  • using the movement training application can be an iterative process, where the athlete continues to monitor his performance and take measurements to ensure that his performance is improving.
  • comparison unit can examine the data in Boxes A-C. 510-530, and provide a score, e.g., between 1-100, or a letter grade score, e.g. "A,” "B,” etc.
  • the user can also be provided feedback to help them improve their scores.
  • the user may be told "Your upper body is too high” so that the user receives advice on how to correct the degrees at which their movement or position departs from the desired angle.
  • exercises, drills, movements, etc. can be suggested based on the user's score and the analysis performed.
  • the movement training application allows each athlete to have an individual account which may be accessed through the main website. For example, each athlete's performance of lift, run, drill, etc., is accessible on his or her account. The athletes are able to draw lines, by way of direction, to show body position throughout and allow interactive learning of correct positioning.
  • the data for multiple athletes can be compiled and presented in a table 1500 to evaluate an athlete's progress over the course of a training program and compare the athlete to other athletes participating in the same program.
  • Individual athletes can be listed by name (or a designated generic identifier) on the multiple rows 1502, and the data compiled during their training sessions can be displayed in the multiple columns 1504 across the top of the table 1500.
  • the data may include the difference in calculated angles over the course of several training sessions so that the user or athlete can determine if their movement and positions are improving.
  • the user or athlete may be prompted to enter additional information into the GUI which will provide further analysis of the progress of the athlete through the training programs.
  • the amount of weight that an athlete lifts in a bench press may be input and displayed over the course of several training sessions to show whether an athlete is increasing the amount of weight being lifted as they go through the movement training process.
  • the effectiveness of the movement training system can then be evaluated in terms of the athlete's improved performance, strength, speed or any other quantitative category which can be measured and entered into the system.
  • an athlete may be trained in a weightlifting activity such as a bench press, as illustrated in FIGs. 16A-16D and 17A-17C.
  • the user opens the movement training application on the portable device and sees the GUI 1600 shown in FIG. 16A.
  • FIG. 16A illustrates a screen shot of the GUI 1600 where the user is asked to stop the video 1602 at a specific time 1604 in the video sequence when the athlete 1606 in the video is at a specific position in the bench press movement.
  • video buttons 1608 labeled "1 - 19” which allow a user to view up to nineteen different videos per activity. Selecting button "1" will play a first video sequence of the athlete completing a single bench press action.
  • a start/stop button 1610 allows the user to start and stop the video
  • a Frame-by-Frame button 1612 allows the user move through the video sequence frame-by-frame, as shown by the time marker 1604.
  • Zoom buttons 1614 allow the user to zoom in or out on the image to better identify the athlete' s position.
  • a home page button 1616 (H) allows the user to return to the main GUI of the application
  • an Enter button 1618 allows the user to tell the application to calculate the difference in angles once the user has selected appropriate positions on the athlete's body 1606.
  • a Clear button 1620 resets the entire method, and a degree of correction box 1622 displays the difference between the desired angle and the measured angle.
  • a full screen button 1624 expands the GUI to fill an entire screen of a display for easier viewing.
  • Navigational buttons 1626 "up, down, left, and right” are used to move the video 1602 around the GUI 1600.
  • Sequence buttons 1628 labeled 1 -9 on the right side refer to different types of measurements that can be made for any one activity (such as the bench press). There may be more or less measurements depending on the type of activity, to the number of sequence buttons 1628 is not limited to only 9.
  • the GUI may also include a message button which may be used to send messages to the athlete in the video or other users to discuss the measurements being observed or tips on correcting certain movements.
  • Sequence 1 is a forearm position
  • Sequence 2 is the upper arm position
  • Sequence 1 forearm position
  • the video is advanced frame -by-frame to the frame where the weight 1630 is at its lowest position (resting on the chest of the athlete 1606), as shown in FIG. 16B.
  • the user is then prompted to identify the middle of the elbow and select a first point (by clicking the mouse at that point), and a first dot 1632 is created on the user- selected point.
  • the user is then prompted to select a second point on the middle of the wrist, and a second dot 1634 is created at that point, as shown in FIG. 16C.
  • a straight line 1636 appears which passes through the middle of the first dot 1632 and second dot 1634.
  • FIG. 16C A straight line 1636 appears which passes through the middle of the first dot 1632 and second dot 1634.
  • the movement training application measures the angle between the two dots 1632, 1634. This is the angle of the user's forearm.
  • the application compares this angle with a desired angle stored in a database, and outputs a degree of correction in the correction box 1622.
  • the degree of correction is "2," which may indicate to the user that the athlete needs to adjust the position of the forearm by 2 degrees. If the number was negative (i.e. -2), this would tell the user that the athlete needs to adjust the position of the forearm by 2 degrees in the opposite direction.
  • the basic process of movement training is now complete.
  • the user can select the "Clear" button 1620 which removes the dots, lines and degree of correction, as illustrated in FIG. 17A.
  • the user may now click on Sequence 2 from the sequence buttons 1628 in order to now calculate the position of the upper arm during the bench press.
  • the video is advanced to the same time as previous, where the athlete 1606 has the weight 1630 at a lowest position.
  • the user is prompted to select a point at the middle of the armpit, and a first dot 1638 appears.
  • FIG. 17A the “Clear” button 1620 which removes the dots, lines and degree of correction
  • the user is asked to click on a point at the middle of the elbow, and a second dot 1640 appears, followed by a straight line 1642 which passes through the middle of the first dot 1638 and second dot 1640.
  • This is the angle of the user's upper arm.
  • the application compares this angle with a desired angle stored in a database, and outputs a degree of correction in the correction box 1622.
  • the degree of correction is "-1," which may indicate to the user that the athlete needs to adjust the position of the forearm by 1 degree. If the number was positive (i.e. 1, this would tell the user that the athlete needs to adjust the position of the forearm by 1 degree in the opposite direction.
  • the basic process of movement training is now complete.
  • the user may want to compare videos from different sessions by selecting different video buttons 1608 along the bottom of the GUI. The user can then compare an athlete's movement and position over a period of time through several training sessions in order to determine if the athlete is improving, staying the same or regressing.
  • FIG. 18A illustrates a GUI 1800 showing a method of calculating the angle of a front foot as it strikes the ground.
  • a first dot 1802 is placed where the front foot hits the ground, and a second dot 1804 is placed at the athlete's hip area.
  • the line 1806 is then drawn between the first dot 1802 and second dot 1804, and the user selects "Enter" 1808 to have the difference between the athlete's angle and a desired angle be output in the correction box 1810.
  • FIG. 18A illustrates a GUI 1800 showing a method of calculating the angle of a front foot as it strikes the ground.
  • a first dot 1802 is placed where the front foot hits the ground
  • a second dot 1804 is placed at the athlete's hip area.
  • the line 1806 is then drawn between the first dot 1802 and second dot 1804, and the user selects "Enter” 1808 to have the difference between the athlete's angle and a desired angle be output in the correction box 1810.
  • FIG. 18B illustrates the method of identifying the angle of the back leg, or recovery leg, during a running motion.
  • a first dot 1812 is placed at the knee of the recovery leg, and a second dot 1814 is placed at the hip of the athlete.
  • the line 1816 is drawn between the two dots, and the user hits the "Enter" button 1808 to receive the difference between the athlete's measured angle and the desired angle output to the correction box 1810.
  • Rotational components are critical to efficient movement; they are the body's mechanism to produce motion. The strength an athlete attains must be that which produces rotational stability along with prime muscle strength and speed of contraction. The same body positions required for perfect motion must be maintained in all strength work so that the transfer to performance is automatic. Otherwise, the rotations will be shut down, the stabilizers deactivated, and performance compromised. In addition, total muscle action will not be developed, and compensation creating over work of certain muscles, out of position, will cause injury.
  • the feedback obtained from the movement training application may be used as an educational tool for both the athlete and the coaches/parents.
  • the coaches or teacher when applied to a classroom) may have access to all video, grading, and progress of each participant, so that it becomes documentation, tracking tool for them as well.
  • the movement training application also carries the ability for a coach to communicate with the athlete through his account, posting comments on performance, and for the athlete to submit understanding of his video analysis to the coach.
  • FIG. 19A illustrates a representation of a computer system 1900 and a user 1902.
  • the user 1902 uses the computer system 1900 to perform performance training based on movement mechanics and functional strength development in an athlete.
  • the computer system 1900 stores and executes a movement training application 1990.
  • FIG. 19B is a functional block diagram illustrating the computer system 1900 hosting the movement training application 1990.
  • the controller 1910 is a programmable processor and controls the operation of the computer system 1900 and its components.
  • the controller 1910 loads instructions (e.g., in the form of a computer program) from the memory 1920 or an embedded controller memory (not shown) and executes these instructions to control the system.
  • the controller 1910 provides the movement training application 1990 as a software system.
  • this service can be implemented as separate hardware components in the controller 1910 or the computer system 1900.
  • Memory 1920 stores data temporarily for use by the other components of the computer system 1900.
  • memory 1920 is implemented as RAM.
  • memory 1920 also includes long-term or permanent memory, such as flash memory and/or ROM.
  • Storage 1930 stores data temporarily or long term for use by other components of the computer system 1900, such as for storing data used by the movement training application 1990. Such stored data may include previously measured athlete values.
  • storage 1930 is a hard disk drive.
  • the media device 1940 receives removable media and reads and/or writes data to the inserted media.
  • the media device 1940 is an optical disc drive.
  • the user interface 1950 includes components for accepting user input from the user of the computer system 1900 and presenting information to the user.
  • the user interface 1950 includes a keyboard, a mouse, audio speakers, and a display.
  • the controller 1910 uses input from the user to adjust the operation of the computer system 1900.
  • the I O interface 1960 includes one or more I/O ports to connect to corresponding I/O devices, such as external storage or supplemental devices (e.g. , a printer or a PDA).
  • the ports of the I/O interface 1960 include ports such as: USB ports, PCMCIA ports, serial ports, and/or parallel ports.
  • the I/O interface 1960 includes a wireless interface for communication with external devices wirelessly.
  • the network interface 1970 includes a wired and/or wireless network connection, such as an RJ-45 or "Wi-Fi” interface (including, but not limited to 802.11) supporting an Ethernet connection.
  • a wired and/or wireless network connection such as an RJ-45 or "Wi-Fi" interface (including, but not limited to 802.11) supporting an Ethernet connection.
  • the computer system 1900 includes additional hardware and software typical of computer systems (e.g., power, cooling, operating system), though these components are not specifically shown in FIG. 19B for simplicity.
  • different configurations of the computer system can be used (e.g. , different bus or storage configurations or a multi-processor configuration).
  • FIG. 20 is a flow chart which illustrates one embodiment of a method of training a human body.
  • a first step 2002 at least one image of a human body is captured.
  • at least one position of the human body is selected on the captured image.
  • the at least one position may be selected by selecting at least two points on the human body.
  • an angle of the human body is determined at the at least one selected position.
  • a difference is calculated between the angle at the selected position and a desired angle of the at least one selected position.
  • a corrective action is displayed to the user based on the calculated difference.
  • the systems and methods described above may be used to measure a user's technique during a physical activity, which along with a separate metric for strength or related ability, can be combined to provide an overall "performance ready" value.
  • the performance ready value will indicate how ready the user is to perform the physical activity being evaluated, or if numerous physical activities are being evaluated, the user' s overall ability to perform (such as in a particular sport).
  • the performance ready score may be based on the combination of a technique score and a strength score, although other criteria relating to a user's physical ability and movement may be used, such as the movements described in the sections above.
  • FIG. 21 illustrates an image of a user interface where a user's technique may be evaluated, as has been described above.
  • the user in the image is being evaluated with regard to their technique of swinging a lacrosse stick.
  • the specific technique being evaluated is the angle of the user' s rear foot as it pushes off the ground while the user swings the lacrosse stick. Additionally, the angle of the user's leg is measured. These techniques can then be given values based on preset thresholds or amounts.
  • the performance ready value is an average of a technique score and a strength score, as shown by the table in FIG. 22.
  • a list of users on the left row (with names obscured for privacy) is provided, and subsequent columns on the right display numerical scores relating to past and present technique and a percentage of change over this time; scores relating to the user's past and present strength and a percentage of change over this time; and a past and present performance score and a percentage change over time.
  • the performance score maybe a numerical average of the technique and strength scores, or it could be a weighted average where one of the criteria is weighted more heavily than another.
  • a percentage of change of the performance ready score over time may also be included, which may be the output that tells the user or a coach or trainer what the user' s overall performance ability is and whether they are continuing to improve.
  • an overall performance ready table is shown, which displays a list of users' past and present scores that have been averaged across a number of different physical activities for which they were measured.
  • the overall performance ready score may be an average of five different physical activities which the user is completing.
  • This overall performance ready score therefore provides a broader picture of a user' s overall physical ability as opposed to just a particular type of physical activity. Thus, a coach, trainer or even the user may see if they are making progress based on an easy to understand numerical score.
  • the performance score may be simplified to a number between 1 and 10, or it could be complex enough to require a larger ratings system, such as 1 to 100.
  • the performance score may be utilized to measure a user's progress toward recovery from an injury.
  • the user's progress may be measured based on their current and historical performance readiness values.
  • this pre-injury performance ready value can be used as a benchmark to determine when the user has fully recovered from their injury.
  • the performance ready scores may be monitored to look at trends that may be occurring across athletes of a same discipline or a group being trained with a particular technique or trainer. If the users in a particular group see a noticeable increase or decrease in their performance activity, the particular trainer, training sets, time spent training and other factors may be reviewed to determine the reason for the trending performance ready scores.
  • a user that receives a low score in technique for a particular activity may receive a message with a tip on how to correct the technique and improve their technique score.
  • the message may include a hyperlink to a picture or video which demonstrates a proper technique, or even a hyperlink to the user's own video of their performance along with annotations that show why the user' s technique is poor and how to correct it.
  • An image of a messaging system which may be implemented is illustrated in FIG. 24.
  • the messaging system may be provided to a coach or trainer who wants to communicate with their team or a specific athlete with regard to the performance ready scores that they are reviewing.
  • the message interface may list one or more message senders, the message recipient(s), a brief summary of the message, and other pertinent information.
  • the user may receive their own performance ready scores and other related scores in the message as well, so they can see their progress and identify their own trends.
  • FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a method of evaluating a physical activity of a user to determine a performance ready score.
  • a first step 2502 one or more images of a user performing a physical activity are received for processing of the user's movement, as has been described herein.
  • a user's technique during the performance of the activity can be evaluated (such as the angle of the athlete's foot in FIG. 21).
  • the user's technique is assigned a numerical score.
  • a strength score is determined based on data received with regard to the user's measured strength during the physical activity. Once the strength score and technique score are determined, these two scores are combined in step 2508 to generate a performance ready score.
  • the technique and strength scores may be combined by averaging the two scores, summing the two scores, or weighting one or both of the scores individually before summing or averaging.
  • the performance ready score can then be displayed to the user or another interested party in order to empirically assess the user's physical ability.
  • the performance ready score may be compared with past performance ready scores from the same user or with performance ready scores from other users in related groups, activities, teams, etc. to determine trends and patterns relevant to the user' s training.
  • One or more drills may be developed which focus on training a user to improve their movement, technique and overall performance readiness. Efficient movement is the common requirement of every sport, and teaching the body to create efficient movement is the basis for improving balance, coordination, timing, quickness, explosion and speed. Improving these athletic components allows an athlete to excel in the used of specific skills.
  • the system is developmental, and teaches the athlete how to use the feet effectively and then to assimilate that action throughout the rest of the body to produce synchronized action and reaction. This is done through a series of movement drills that address each component of movement and become more complex and inclusive as the athlete progresses.
  • Ankle Bounce Backward - works on the coordination and timing of the upper and lower body together as the push backward coordinates with the release of the opposite side. It also helps develop balance over the mid foot, along with stability and control in carriage of the upper body.
  • Lateral Ankle Bounce Addresses the ability to use the mid foot at a lateral angle, strengthening the use of the foot into inner leg, developing core strength to carry the body in balance as it moves laterally. Done correctly, this drill helps develop reactive ability in the feet to get on the ground quickly and in position under the hips.
  • Low Push Zig Zag - Adds the component of using the mid foot in an angled direction to direct motion. Strength to hold upper body in position, while feet work at an angle is an additional component developed here, which is required in multiple sport skills applications. Feet must react first, then core ability must hold the upper body and hip position to take the body to the desired point as a unit.
  • Lateral Bounce Push Out emphasizes the push across the mid foot to direct the body in a lateral direction, but adds the component of extension as more ground is covered.
  • the feet have to react more quickly to handle the increased energy, and still contact under the hips as the drill is performed. Arm action is performed in a larger range, as well, and coordinated with more rapid motion from the feet.
  • Lateral Bounce Side to Side - Full turn is required as the lateral bounce is performed to a change of direction that is initiated by the push across the mid foot, resulting in a turn of the hips, keeping balance, as the upper body follows hips, and the foot contact is in the correct position for the next push. Multiple turns are repeated in the course of the drill.
  • Firing Forward to Backward continues the mechanics of the turn into the skill of firing, both forward and backward, requiring the foot use, balance, coordination, timing, quickness of mid foot response, hip position, and arm action.
  • One foot is the primary focal point of the turn for multiple reps, then the other side is the active component. We train each side independently, to obtain unilateral proficiency.
  • Zig Zag Low Push w Vert - Performing the zig zag low push while adding a vertical jump at last foot contact creates the ability to redistribute weight to the next motion and use the foot action to redirect the body into a vertical direction with quickness and power. Landing into a low position and producing another zig zag pattern requires the body to stabilize through the hips and hamstrings, and develops the immediate use of the foot to create the motion, in order to keep feet under the body, required for balance. Reactive strength and explosion are further enhanced by the vertical jump.
  • Level III drills at this level we combine components of the first two levels to further the development of coordination, and the ability to move in various directions with speed and power.
  • Run to Backpedal, back to Run - Works on first step speed, body control to stop in balance, and the ability to maintain position by using the feet to reverse. This requires holding body position during the backpedal, being able to stop in balance again, and create immediate speed forward again. Repeated multiple times during the rep.
  • L Drill - Various bouncing and running mechanics drills are performed on a lined surface where multiple stops and starts are performed at right angles. Emphasizes the ability to achieve the components of the drills with the addition of balanced stops and redirection with speed and quickness.
  • Level IV Drills includes sport specific drills that take the abilities the athletes have developed to the next level. At this point, the athlete needs proficiency in the mechanics so that the skills are performed with balance, correct body positioning, stability, quickness, power, timing and speed. With this as a base, sport specific drills take the athleticism to the requirements of the respective sport. These drills are designed to replicate particular offensive or defensive actions that the athlete must perform.
  • Defensive Lateral Push Uses the lateral low push, but adds an offensive opponent to react off of.
  • the offensive player runs laterally, while the defensive player uses a powerful lateral push to stay with the offensive player.
  • the offensive player reverses direction at a particular point, and the defensive player must react with the outside foot to redirect the push to match up.
  • the defender is able to push from side to side, at one level. If he is up and down, too much time is spent in the air, and speed of movement is compromised. Feet must move quickly, in contact with the ground, and be under the body, in order to react quickly enough to cover an opponent.
  • [00173] Defensive Drop and Run - Uses the backward push and redirect across the mid foot to run at an angle.
  • the offensive player runs toward the defender, who pushes back to give ground, making sure the weight distribution is over the outside foot, then immediately reacts across the mid foot to run at the same angle the offensive player has gone, in order to stay with him.
  • the defender In order to cover the opponent quickly enough to stay with him, the defender must be in a low, balanced position, and be able to react from the foot to direct the body. Timing is very important to enable the athlete to push back, and release on the other side at the same time, allowing him to cover ground, and still maintain body position. Then, the foot must be able to react across the mid foot to direct the hips into an angle to run with.
  • the feet must also generate the run, supported by arm action to time the upper body with the feet.
  • the system automatically calculates the weight, number of reps and number of sets for each user workout based on the user' s current strength (and movement) levels, and makes adjustments to the user workout in real time based on the number of reps the user is able to complete for each set. For example, if a user is achieving fewer reps than would be expected at a certain weight, the system will immediately adjust the next set to be at a lower weight than if the user was getting a higher number of reps. This adjustment is made in real time based on an analysis of the user' s current performance in comparison with their previous performance, as well as a comparison of average expected weights and reps for a similar user.
  • a real-time feedback system 200 is illustrated in FIG. 26, and may include a human body position analysis unit 202 which determines an angle of a human body at a selected position and calculates a difference between the angle of the selected position and a desired angle of the selected position; a workout creation unit 204 which creates a workout program based on the calculated difference; an evaluation unit 206 which evaluates the user's performance during the workout program; and a workout feedback unit 208 which adjusts the workout program in real time based on the evaluation of the user' s performance.
  • a notification unit 210 is also available to send alerts to coaches, teachers, staff members and even parents.
  • a method of assessing a user's performance is illustrated in FIG.
  • the system calculates what the weight should be for each set based on the performance of the prior set. This is done to keep muscle contraction at 95% intensity or above. Example: let's say the weight to use on a first set comes up at 200 lbs, and requires 10 reps.
  • the system will calculate the next set to be 251 lbs, and require 5 reps.
  • the system will calculate the next set to be 274 and require 3 reps. If the next time the user completes the exercise, their first rep was calculated at 2071bs, based off the prior workout, the required reps will be 8.
  • the system will calculate the next set to be 246. This is less weight than the second set of the prior workout (251 to 246).
  • the system adjusts the weight for each set based on how the user is performing on that particular day. This is how the system keeps the intensity levels for that day at 95% or above. If the user gets too heavy too fast, the user will lose intensity of muscle contraction, and muscle contraction is a key factor for assessing the workout.
  • the system performs all of the necessary calculations - estimated maximum, intensity levels for each set, performance ready numbers, etc. and feeds the data to the user in real time, along with the updated requirements and recommendations.
  • the system also stores the information in the database for providing feedback to the user or coach at a later date.
  • a user has the option to pair exercises that are being completed back to back by selecting a "pairing" button on the user interface. This also provides the user with two screens.
  • the system also advises the user when he or she is required to video a set (or movement session) which will be evaluated and then available to the user through a link on the user page.
  • the app provides instantaneous feedback to the user on a number of important strength factors such as theoretical maximum levels, workout intensity, performance ready percentage (as described above - a calculated percentage which shows the strength, speed or another movement criterion of the user as compared to the level of an elite athlete for the same criterion or for multiple criteria) and workout history (which provides a graph of the user's workout history based on date criteria selected by the user).
  • the user is provided with additional evaluation options to review a history of their workouts, workout evaluations and graphs of the user data to review their overall progress towards particular goals.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)
  • Rehabilitation Therapy (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des systèmes et des procédés pour évaluer et corriger une performance physique d'une activité d'un être humain. Un utilisateur réalisant une ou plusieurs activités physiques peut être évalué sur la base de critères associés à ses mouvements, tels que la force et la technique. La performance de l'utilisateur associée à ces critères est ensuite classée, et les valeurs des critères sont combinées pour fournir un résultat de performance globale. Le résultat de performance est utilisé pour déterminer une rapidité et une capacité globales de l'utilisateur à réaliser l'activité physique qui a été évaluée ou une capacité globale à réaliser des activités physiques. Des résultats de performance pour plus d'une activité physique peuvent être combinés pour fournir un résultat de rapidité de performance globale, qui capture la capacité physique globale de la personne. Des comparaisons de résultats de performance au fil du temps et de rétroaction en temps réel peuvent fournir des informations pour savoir si un utilisateur progresse ou non, et peuvent être appliquées pour évaluer des rééducations physiques de blessures.
PCT/US2014/030520 2013-03-15 2014-03-17 Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer une performance physique Ceased WO2014145711A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1518100.1A GB2527460B (en) 2013-03-15 2014-03-17 Systems and methods for evaluating physical performance
AU2014232710A AU2014232710A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-03-17 Systems and methods for evaluating physical performance
CA2909514A CA2909514A1 (fr) 2013-03-15 2014-03-17 Systemes et procedes pour evaluer une performance physique

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/843,211 US9025824B2 (en) 2010-12-07 2013-03-15 Systems and methods for evaluating physical performance
US13/843,211 2013-03-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014145711A1 true WO2014145711A1 (fr) 2014-09-18

Family

ID=51538072

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2014/030520 Ceased WO2014145711A1 (fr) 2013-03-15 2014-03-17 Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer une performance physique

Country Status (4)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2014232710A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2909514A1 (fr)
GB (1) GB2527460B (fr)
WO (1) WO2014145711A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020252599A1 (fr) * 2019-06-21 2020-12-24 Flex Artificial Intelligence Inc. Procédé et système de mesure et d'analyse de mouvement, de positionnement et de posture du corps
CN114093032A (zh) * 2021-11-26 2022-02-25 重庆大学 一种基于动作状态信息的人体动作评估方法
WO2024055186A1 (fr) * 2022-09-14 2024-03-21 深圳市韶音科技有限公司 Procédé et système d'évaluation de mouvement

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100772497B1 (ko) * 2006-10-09 2007-11-01 박찬애 골프 클리닉 시스템 및 그것의 운용방법
US20080319349A1 (en) * 2005-04-18 2008-12-25 Yitzhak Zilberman System and Related Method For Determining a Measurement Between Locations on a Body
US20090298650A1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2009-12-03 Gershom Kutliroff Method and system for interactive fitness training program
WO2012078795A1 (fr) * 2010-12-07 2012-06-14 Vincent Ned Stephenson Systèmes et procédés d'apprentissage de performances

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9457256B2 (en) * 2010-11-05 2016-10-04 Nike, Inc. Method and system for automated personal training that includes training programs
US9283429B2 (en) * 2010-11-05 2016-03-15 Nike, Inc. Method and system for automated personal training

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080319349A1 (en) * 2005-04-18 2008-12-25 Yitzhak Zilberman System and Related Method For Determining a Measurement Between Locations on a Body
KR100772497B1 (ko) * 2006-10-09 2007-11-01 박찬애 골프 클리닉 시스템 및 그것의 운용방법
US20090298650A1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2009-12-03 Gershom Kutliroff Method and system for interactive fitness training program
WO2012078795A1 (fr) * 2010-12-07 2012-06-14 Vincent Ned Stephenson Systèmes et procédés d'apprentissage de performances

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
SAMENIENE ET AL.: "`The evaluation of the rehabilitation effects on cognitive dysfunction and changes in psychomotor reactions in stroke patients", MEDICINA (KAUNAS, vol. 44, no. 11, 2008, pages 860 - 870 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020252599A1 (fr) * 2019-06-21 2020-12-24 Flex Artificial Intelligence Inc. Procédé et système de mesure et d'analyse de mouvement, de positionnement et de posture du corps
CN114093032A (zh) * 2021-11-26 2022-02-25 重庆大学 一种基于动作状态信息的人体动作评估方法
WO2024055186A1 (fr) * 2022-09-14 2024-03-21 深圳市韶音科技有限公司 Procédé et système d'évaluation de mouvement

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201518100D0 (en) 2015-11-25
CA2909514A1 (fr) 2014-09-18
GB2527460B (en) 2018-02-14
GB2527460A (en) 2015-12-23
AU2014232710A1 (en) 2015-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9025824B2 (en) Systems and methods for evaluating physical performance
CA2819067C (fr) Systemes et procedes d'apprentissage de performances
US20200314489A1 (en) System and method for visual-based training
Spoelstra Complete conditioning for basketball
US9878206B2 (en) Method for interactive training and analysis
Anderson et al. Enhancing motor skill acquisition with augmented feedback
US10548511B2 (en) Wearable body monitors and system for collecting and analyzing data and and predicting the trajectory of an object
CN112585637A (zh) 一种运动教学系统及其使用方法、运动设备、计算机可读存储介质
US20220370853A1 (en) J-sleeve system
US20220047920A1 (en) Systems and methods for personalized fitness assessments and workout routines
WO2020259858A1 (fr) Cadre pour l'enregistrement et l'analyse de capacités de mouvement
US20210307652A1 (en) Systems and devices for measuring, capturing, and modifying partial and full body kinematics
Edriss et al. Pose estimation for pickleball players’ kinematic analysis through MediaPipe-based deep learning: a pilot study
WO2014145711A1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer une performance physique
US12586417B1 (en) AI-powered sports training system with enhanced motion synchronization and comparative analysis capabilities
US20220180634A1 (en) Method for Teaching Precision Body Movements and Complex Patterns of Activity
JP7792138B2 (ja) 指導支援システム
Judge et al. Using sport science to improve coaching: A case study of Felisha Johnson’s Road to Rio
Fortenbaugh The biomechanics of the baseball swing
AU2011338407B2 (en) Systems and methods for performance training
Orlandi et al. Meta-trainer: An augmented reality trainer for home fitness with real-time feedback
US20250153005A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Determining Weight Distribution and Balance in Athletics, Gaming, and Healthcare
Tverdokhlebova Development of a Training Tool for Preventing Lower Back Pain in Golfers
Johnson The Influence of Single-Leg Isometrics on Ground Interactions during a Baseball Swing
Jones The Efficacy of Concurrent, Multimodal, Augmented Feedback for Golf Kinematic Sequence Training

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14763500

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 1518100

Country of ref document: GB

Kind code of ref document: A

Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20140317

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1518100.1

Country of ref document: GB

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2909514

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014232710

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20140317

Kind code of ref document: A

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14763500

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1