WO2019114896A1 - Réponse d'alarme dans une éolienne à rotors multiples - Google Patents

Réponse d'alarme dans une éolienne à rotors multiples Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019114896A1
WO2019114896A1 PCT/DK2018/050319 DK2018050319W WO2019114896A1 WO 2019114896 A1 WO2019114896 A1 WO 2019114896A1 DK 2018050319 W DK2018050319 W DK 2018050319W WO 2019114896 A1 WO2019114896 A1 WO 2019114896A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rotor
wind turbine
rotors
controlling
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/DK2018/050319
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Kim Hylling SØRENSEN
Tobias Gybel Hovgaard
Jacob Deleuran GRUNNET
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Original Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vestas Wind Systems AS filed Critical Vestas Wind Systems AS
Publication of WO2019114896A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019114896A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D1/00—Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor 
    • F03D1/02—Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor  having a plurality of rotors
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D17/00—Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/0296—Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor to prevent, counteract or reduce noise emissions
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2270/00—Control
    • F05B2270/40—Type of control system
    • F05B2270/404—Type of control system active, predictive, or anticipative
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70—Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for controlling a multi-rotor wind turbine with at least two rotors.
  • the method comprises a step of receiving, from a first one of the at least two rotors, an error signal and a step of, in dependence of the error signal, determining respective error responses for the first one and at least a second one of the other rotors .
  • the method further comprises a step of submitting the error responses for the first and second rotors to their respective controllers.
  • the invention further relates to a computer program product and a multi-rotor wind turbine operable to perform such a method.
  • Each rotor is operated by a respective local controller.
  • a central controller connected to the four local controllers, monitors the operation of the complete wind turbine system and based thereon calculates local control objectives for the separate rotors.
  • the respective rotor can be shut down or derated in accordance with one of the methods described in the aforementioned patents and patent applications. With one rotor delivering less or no power, while the other rotors on the multi-rotor wind turbine still operating at full capacity, the wind will exert higher thrust forces to some rotors than to others. As a result, the wind turbine would endure excessive tower top displacement and/or tower torsion.
  • the other rotors have to be stopped or derated in accordance with the alarm scenario for the dysfunctional one. If an alarm scenario is activated too frequently, this will significantly reduce the total amount of electrical power produced by the wind turbine and will diminish the advantages of having multiple rotors on one wind turbine tower.
  • this object is achieved by providing a method for controlling a multi-rotor wind turbine with at least two rotors, the method comprising a step of receiving, from a first one of the at least two rotors, an error signal, and a step of, in dependence of the error signal, determining respective error responses for the first one and at least a second one of the other rotors, at least one of the error responses comprising a control signal and the respective error responses for the first and second rotors being different.
  • the method further comprises a step of submitting the at least one control signal to a controller of the respective rotor.
  • the wind turbine will be able to continue to provide a high output power when only one or a subset of its rotors has to be stopped or derated due to a detected alarm condition (indicated by the error signal). Instead of equally shutting down or derating the still normally functioning rotors, the wind turbine allows the other rotors to provide more power than they would have done in a wind turbine that does not use the method according to the invention.
  • the response strategy determined with the method according to the invention can be implemented by the controllers of the respective rotors using the determined control signal or signals to adjust their operations. It is to be noted that a possible error response may be to not change the operation of one or more of the rotors at all.
  • the step of determining the respective error responses comprises determining an expected effect of available error responses on at least one operational constraint.
  • the available error response include, but are not limited to, bringing one or more of the rotors to a full stop, putting one or more rotors in a derated power mode or in an idling mode.
  • the control signal may, e.g., provide a maximum allowed power output, a specific power output target, specific pitch and/or yaw angles or limits on the rotational speed or tip speed ratio.
  • Useful operational constraints to take into account are, e.g., a threshold for generator speed, actuator movement, mechanical stress, thrust imbalances, fatigue load and power output.
  • a constraint may be a hard limit, the wind turbine or rotor controllers not allowing the respective parameter to exceed the defined threshold.
  • the constraint may assign a certain cost to exceeding such a threshold and the determined error responses may result from an algorithm weighing all the beneficial and adverse effects of the available error responses.
  • Important operational constraints are constraints on the structural forces that may act on the wind turbine tower and its rotor carrying arms due to thrust imbalances between different rotors.
  • the aerodynamic symmetry is broken and the thrust forces on different rotors will be different.
  • This imbalance may lead to increased mechanical stress and fatigue loads or structural displacement of, e.g., a rotor carrying arm or the tower top of the wind turbine.
  • Such a limit may, e.g., be implemented as a fixed or relative amount. It is, however, preferred to calculate an expected amount thrust imbalance based on one or more available error response scenarios or to calculate an optimal error response scenario based on one or more predetermined thresholds of maximum allowable structural load.
  • a further improvement of the method according to the invention is obtained when the step of determining the respective error responses is performed using Model Predictive Control (MPC).
  • MPC algorithms use a holistic model of the wind turbine, combining the aerodynamic characteristics of the rotors with mechanical characteristics of the wind turbine structure. Such an advanced model is well suited for taking multiple inputs (e.g. wind speed, tip speed ratio, rotor speed, generator speed, ...) into account to provide multiple outputs (e.g. pitch angles, yaw angles, individual rotor power outputs, rotor speeds or tip speed ratios, ...) to fulfil a number of objectives (e.g. maximum power output, tolerable structural load, maximum noise levels, ).
  • MPC allows controlling the multi-rotor wind turbine in a manner which ensures optimized operation of the complete system in relation to predefined criteria.
  • MPC not only reacts to sensor information, but can also predict how the individual rotors and the complete wind turbine structure will react to and function after implementing a wide range of possible control strategies. Considering a small set of predetermined criteria, the MPC can predict, select and apply the optimal control settings for each rotor of the multi-rotor wind turbine.
  • MPC Model Predictive Control
  • the step of determining the respective error responses is performed using Model Predictive Control (MPC)
  • MPC Model Predictive Control
  • the MPC can predict the effect that different error response strategies will have on the operation of the individual rotors or the thrust imbalance on different rotors. Accordingly an optimal error response is selected that will combine high power output with safe and efficient operating conditions.
  • a multi-rotor wind turbine comprising at least two rotors.
  • Each rotor comprises a respective controller and the wind turbine further comprises a common controller, operatively coupled to the respective controllers and configured to perform the methods according to the invention.
  • the common controller may, e.g. be located in one of the rotors of the multi-rotor wind turbine, somewhere else in or on the wind turbine structure, or on a location further away from the wind turbine itself.
  • a computer program product comprising computer code for performing, when executed on a computing means, a method according to the invention.
  • Figures 1 A and 1 B schematically show two examples of a multi-rotor wind turbine in which the method according to the invention may be implemented.
  • Figure 2 shows a schematic representation of the most relevant functional parts of the multi-rotor wind turbine.
  • Figure 3 shows a flow diagram representing the steps in the method according to the invention.
  • Figure 4 schematically shows the multi-rotor wind turbine and some of the structural loads it may have to bear.
  • FIG. 1A schematically shows a multi-rotor wind turbine 100 in which the method according to the invention may be implemented.
  • the currently most common type of wind turbine is the horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT). It usually has a nacelle placed on top of a high vertical pole, with the rotor blades attached to a horizontal low speed shaft that extends from the nacelle.
  • the nacelle may comprise a gear box for coupling the low speed shaft to an also horizontal high speed shaft that is connected to the generator. Power generated by the generator is transported to the ground by a power line running through the core of the pole, where it can be used or stored immediately or be coupled to a larger power grid.
  • this multi-rotor wind turbine 100 comprises two or more nacelles, here shown with four nacelles 111 ,
  • the nacelles 111-141 are spaced from each other by attaching them to arms 105, originating from the pole.
  • all four arms 105 originate from the same top part of the wind turbine 100, but one or more arms may also be attached to a lower part of the pole.
  • FIG. 1 B An example of a multi-rotor wind turbine different from the one shown in Fig. 1A is shown in Fig. 1 B, where the four rotors are arranged in two layers, and each layer can be yawed independently. While in the current examples all four rotors 110-140 rotate in the same vertical plane, it is also possible to put one or more rotors in different planes. Alternative configurations are also possible. Twin rotor wind turbines have been designed comprising two poles, organized in a V-shape. In the following exemplary embodiments, the multi-rotor wind turbine has four rotors 110-140. It is, however, to be noted that a multi-rotor wind turbine, may alternatively comprise 2, 3, 5, 6 or more rotors.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of some functional parts of the multi-rotor wind turbine 100.
  • the third rotor 130 is omitted.
  • Parameters being received from and submitted to the fourth rotor 140 are denoted by the subscript n for indicating that the invention also works for wind turbines with more than four rotors.
  • the wind turbine also works with two, three, five or more rotors.
  • Each rotor 110, 120, 140 is electronically coupled to a respective controller 115, 125, 145.
  • the controller 115-145 is operable to receive sensor readings from all types of sensors useful for the optimized control of the wind turbine 100.
  • Such sensor readings may represent (and are not limited to) wind speed, speed of rotation, gear box settings, pitch angle, yaw angle and power output.
  • the sensors may, e.g., be installed on the rotor blades, in the rotor hub, in the gearbox or the generator or on a brake or rotor shaft.
  • Wind speed for example, may be measured centrally with only one wind sensor or at each rotor separately using one or more wind speed sensors installed on each rotor.
  • wind speed can be estimated based on a measured power output and the measured values of other relevant parameters.
  • the controller 115-145 processes, and optionally stores, all the incoming information and adjusts control settings like desired pitch angle, yaw angle and speed of rotation in such a way to control and optimize the power output of the rotor 110-140.
  • a common controller 200 is operably connected to the controllers 115-145 of the individual rotors 110-140.
  • the common controller 200 may, e.g. be located in one of the rotors 110-140 of the multi-rotor wind turbine 100, somewhere else in or on the wind turbine structure 100, or on a location further away from the wind turbine 100 itself.
  • Sensor readings and operational data and parameters from the individual rotors 110-140 are sent to the common controller.
  • sensors associated with the individual rotors 110-140 can bypass the individual controllers 115-145 and communicate with the common controller 200 directly.
  • the wind turbine 100 may comprise sensors that register parameters that are not rotor specific. Also such global parameters may be
  • WO 2016/150447 A1 provides a detailed description of how central and local controllers may together control the operation of the wind turbine 100.
  • the rotor controllers 115-145 and the common controller 200 are shown as separate modules or units. Although this implies a physical hardware separation, this need not necessarily be the case. As such, the functionality of the rotor controllers 115-145 and the common controller 200 may be implemented in different physical hardware components with the rotor controllers in communication with and being instructed by the common controller, but may also be implemented on a single hardware component, having associated processing and memory utilities, whilst being functionally separated into appropriate software domains.
  • Figure 3 shows a flow chart of the method according the invention.
  • the local controller 115-145 or a sensor of the rotor 110-140 detects a problem or situation that may interfere with the normal operation of the rotor 110-140.
  • problems that may be detected are mechanical failures of essential parts of a rotor, overheating of the brakes, the generator, the power converter or control electronics, or software failures in the local controller 115-145. While many possible errors may be identified by a single sensor, an error signal may also be generated by the local controller when a combination of sensor readings suggests that something may be wrong.
  • WO 2012/025121 A2 multiple sensor signals representing the state of the wind turbine are analysed to determine whether a specific alarm condition is met as predefined in one of a plurality of different predefined alarm scenarios.
  • the common controller 200 receives an error signal from the rotor 110-140 where the problem is detected.
  • This signal will usually come from the local controller 115-145 of the rotor 110-140 having problems, but may alternatively come directly from a sensor of that rotor 110-140.
  • the common controller 200 receives the error signal, it becomes aware of the alarm condition in the respective rotor 110-140.
  • the common controller 200 would then determine the appropriate response to the detected alarm condition and apply that response to all rotors. 110-140.
  • the selected response strategy may. e.g., be to completely stop and/or shut down the rotors 110-140, to put them in an idle mode or to reduce their power output to a certain level. Because of the aerodynamic effect of applying such a response strategy to the malfunctioning rotor only, it used to be essential to apply the same strategy to the other rotors 110-140 too.
  • the thrust imbalance that results from stopping only one rotor may otherwise lead to, e.g., excessive structural displacement of the rotor arms 105, or tower top and/or high torsional loads on the tower structure. Such additional loads may lead to more damage to the wind turbine 100 and its many different parts, or even to rotor arms 105, rotors 110-140 or parts of rotors 110-140 breaking off.
  • FIG. 4 schematically shows some of the effects a thrust imbalance may have on a multi-rotor wind turbine 100.
  • This exemplary wind turbine 100 comprises two rotor arms 105, each having a rotor 110-140 connected at one end.
  • the rotor arms 105 are connected to the wind turbine tower at connection points 101.
  • the upper and lower rotor arm 105 will be arranged in parallel with all rotors 110-140 being at the same distance from the central axis of the wind turbine tower. If one of the rotors 110-140 is shutdown or derated, the resulting thrust imbalance may cause the respective rotor arm end to be pushed into a fore-aft direction 106 and or in an up-down direction.
  • the common controller 200 is configured to apply different responses to different rotors 110-140 of the multi-rotor wind turbine 100. Although it may not always be safe to shut down or derate one of the rotors 110-140 while all other rotors 110-140 keep on operating at full speed, the common controller 200 of this invention is able to balance power output and the resulting aerodynamic asymmetry in order to maintain maximum power output and not further damage the wind turbine 100 at the same time. Instead of equally shutting down or derating the still normally functioning rotors 110-140, the wind turbine 100 allows the other rotors to provide more power than they would have done in a wind turbine that does not use the method according to the invention.
  • the common controller 200 determines a suitable error response.
  • the error response will comprise control signals for the malfunctioning rotor 110-140 and at least one other rotor 110-140. If the wind turbine 100 only comprises two rotors, positioned at opposite sides of the wind turbine tower, the error response strategy may, e.g., be to shut down the malfunctioning rotor and bring the power output of the other one back to a certain maximum level. The strategy will be such that any aerodynamic asymmetry that may result therefrom will not damage the wind turbine 100 any further. When the wind turbine 100 has more than two rotors, e.g.
  • each rotor 110-140 may be instructed to respond in a different way. It may, e.g., be useful to adapt some control parameters of the still perfectly working rotors to compensate for an aerodynamic situation that changed due to shutting down a rotor 110-140 on the other rotor arm 105. There may also be situations in which it is possible to (partly) compensate for a thrust imbalance in the rotor arm 105 with the malfunctioning rotor 110-140 by introducing a second counteracting thrust imbalance in the other rotor arm 105.
  • the common controller may take into account an expected effect of available error responses on at least one operational constraint.
  • the available error response include, but are not limited to, bringing one or more of the rotors 110-140 to a full stop, putting one or more rotors 110-140 in a derated power mode or in an idling mode.
  • the control signal may, e.g., provide a maximum allowed power output, a specific power output target, specific pitch and/or yaw angles or limits on the rotational speed or tip speed ratio.
  • Useful operational constraints to take into account are, e.g., a threshold for generator speed, actuator movement, mechanical stress, thrust imbalances, fatigue load and power output.
  • a constraint may be a hard limit which the wind turbine 100 or rotor controllers 115-145 not allow to be exceeded.
  • the constraint may assign a certain cost to exceeding such a threshold and the selected error responses may result from an algorithm weighing all the beneficial and adverse effects of the available error responses.
  • Important operational constraints are constraints on the structural forces that may act on the wind turbine tower and its rotor carrying arms 105 due to thrust imbalances between different rotors 110-140.
  • the aerodynamic symmetry is broken and the thrust forces on different rotors 11Q- 140 will be different.
  • This imbalance may lead to increased mechanical stress and fatigue loads or structural displacement of, e.g., a rotor carrying arm 105 or the tower top of the wind turbine 100. It is important to keep such structural forces within acceptable limits. This may, for example, be achieved by limiting the additional power output each rotor 110-140 is allowed to deliver above the power output level of the shutdown or derated rotor 110-140.
  • Such a limit may, e.g., be implemented as a fixed or relative amount. It is, however, preferred to calculate an expected amount thrust imbalance based on one or more available error response scenarios or to calculate an optimal error response scenario based on one or more predetermined thresholds of maximum allowable structural load.
  • the response planning step 33 is performed using Model Predictive Control (MPC).
  • MPC algorithms use a holistic model of the wind turbine 100, combining the aerodynamic characteristics of the rotors with mechanical characteristics of the wind turbine structure. Instead of using a large number of related and interconnected control loops, MPC uses one unified objective function in which all relevant constraints are explicitly included.
  • the MPC combines, e.g., a tower model, a blade model, aerodynamics, a drive train model and/or a noise model.
  • Such an advanced model is well suited for taking multiple inputs (e.g. wind speed, tip speed ratio, rotor speed, generator speed, ...) into account to provide multiple outputs (e.g.
  • MPC allows controlling the multi-rotor wind turbine 100 in a manner which ensures optimized operation of the complete system in relation to predefined criteria.
  • MPC not only reacts to sensor information, but can also predict how the individual rotors 110-140 and the complete wind turbine structure will react to and function after implementing a wide range of possible control strategies. Considering a small set of predetermined criteria, the MPC can predict, select and apply the optimal control settings for each rotor 110-140 of the multi-rotor wind turbine 100.
  • MPC Model Predictive Control
  • the common controller sends the relevant control signals to the respective controllers 115-145 of the individual rotors 110-140 in a subsequent instruction step 34. If one of the rotors 110-140 does not need to adapt its mode of operation, the common controller 200 may either not generate a control signal at all or provide a control signal indicating that no changes are needed.
  • the response strategy determined by the common controller 200 is then implemented by the controllers 115-145 of the respective rotors 110-140 using the respective control signals in a response implementation step 35.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé de commande d'une éolienne à rotors multiples (100) comprenant au moins deux rotors (110, 120, 130, 140). Le procédé comprend une étape consistant à recevoir, à partir d'un premier rotor parmi lesdits au moins deux rotors (110-140), un signal d'erreur, et une étape consistant, en fonction du signal d'erreur, à déterminer des réponses d'erreur respectives pour le premier et au moins un second des autres rotors (110-140), au moins une des réponses d'erreur comprenant un signal de commande et les réponses d'erreur respectives pour les premier et second rotors (110-140) étant différentes. Le procédé comprend en outre une étape consistant à soumettre le ou les signaux de commande à un dispositif de commande (115, 125, 145) du rotor respectif (110).
PCT/DK2018/050319 2017-12-11 2018-12-04 Réponse d'alarme dans une éolienne à rotors multiples Ceased WO2019114896A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA201770930 2017-12-11
DKPA201770930 2017-12-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019114896A1 true WO2019114896A1 (fr) 2019-06-20

Family

ID=64663995

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/DK2018/050319 Ceased WO2019114896A1 (fr) 2017-12-11 2018-12-04 Réponse d'alarme dans une éolienne à rotors multiples

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019114896A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022135641A1 (fr) 2020-12-22 2022-06-30 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Perfectionnements apportés ou se rapportant à des monopieux pour éoliennes
CN115839312A (zh) * 2021-09-18 2023-03-24 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司 双风轮风能转换装置的控制方法及装置
CN116838547A (zh) * 2023-02-23 2023-10-03 北京金风科创风电设备有限公司 多转子风力发电机的监测方法及多转子风力发电机
US12286960B2 (en) 2021-07-01 2025-04-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Control of a multi-rotor wind turbine system using local MPC controllers
US12510052B1 (en) 2024-06-27 2025-12-30 GE Vernova Renovables Espana, S.L. System and method for optimizing control of a wind turbine
US12560150B2 (en) 2021-10-07 2026-02-24 GE Vernova Renovables Espana, S.L. Systems and methods for controlling a wind turbine

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030170123A1 (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-11 William E. Heronemus Vertical array wind turbine
WO2016128002A1 (fr) * 2015-02-12 2016-08-18 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Système de commande comportant des organes de commande centrale et locale pour système d'éoliennes à multiples rotors
WO2016150447A1 (fr) * 2015-03-23 2016-09-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Commande d'un système d'éolienne à rotors multiples utilisant un dispositif de commande central pour calculer des objectifs de commande locaux

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030170123A1 (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-11 William E. Heronemus Vertical array wind turbine
WO2016128002A1 (fr) * 2015-02-12 2016-08-18 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Système de commande comportant des organes de commande centrale et locale pour système d'éoliennes à multiples rotors
WO2016150447A1 (fr) * 2015-03-23 2016-09-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Commande d'un système d'éolienne à rotors multiples utilisant un dispositif de commande central pour calculer des objectifs de commande locaux

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022135641A1 (fr) 2020-12-22 2022-06-30 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Perfectionnements apportés ou se rapportant à des monopieux pour éoliennes
US12286960B2 (en) 2021-07-01 2025-04-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Control of a multi-rotor wind turbine system using local MPC controllers
CN115839312A (zh) * 2021-09-18 2023-03-24 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司 双风轮风能转换装置的控制方法及装置
US12560150B2 (en) 2021-10-07 2026-02-24 GE Vernova Renovables Espana, S.L. Systems and methods for controlling a wind turbine
CN116838547A (zh) * 2023-02-23 2023-10-03 北京金风科创风电设备有限公司 多转子风力发电机的监测方法及多转子风力发电机
CN116838547B (zh) * 2023-02-23 2024-02-23 北京金风科创风电设备有限公司 多转子风力发电机的监测方法及多转子风力发电机
US12510052B1 (en) 2024-06-27 2025-12-30 GE Vernova Renovables Espana, S.L. System and method for optimizing control of a wind turbine

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2019114896A1 (fr) Réponse d'alarme dans une éolienne à rotors multiples
EP3256724B1 (fr) Système de commande comportant des organes de commande centrale et locale pour système d'éoliennes à multiples rotors
CN111788383B (zh) 基于约束的多转子风力涡轮机的推力平衡控制
EP2249030B1 (fr) Éolienne
EP2306007B1 (fr) Procédé et Système pour la régulation d'une Éolienne
EP2588751B1 (fr) Système de positionnement en rotation dans une éolienne
US8093737B2 (en) Method for increasing energy capture in a wind turbine
EP1612414B1 (fr) Méthode et dispositif de réduction des charges sur le rotor d'une éolienne
EP2737205B1 (fr) Procédé pour le mouvement de lacet d'un rotor d'éolienne
EP2447722B1 (fr) Système de contrôle et procédés de vérification de fonctionnement d'au moins un capteur d'éolienne
EP2678556B1 (fr) Système de sécurité pour turbine éolienne
CN110446853A (zh) 用于管理风力涡轮机塔架的扭转振荡的系统和方法
WO2010086688A1 (fr) Atténuation de charge dans une éolienne
JP2023008841A (ja) 風力タービンにおけるアジマスセンサ
WO2017092762A1 (fr) Système de commande pour turbine éolienne ayant de multiples rotors
KR102234121B1 (ko) 풍력 발전 설비의 제어 방법
JP2019078223A (ja) 水平軸風車の制御装置、水平軸風車、水平軸風車の制御プログラム
US12135013B2 (en) De-rating wind turbine tower lateral oscillation control
EP4165296B1 (fr) Commande d'angle de pincement pour turbines éoliennes à rotors multiples
JP2023165630A (ja) 風力タービン制御
EP4547958B1 (fr) Commande de perte de sillage d'éolienne à l'aide d'une perte de sillage aval détectée en fonction de la direction du vent
US20250382944A1 (en) Wind turbine wake loss control using detected downstream wake loss severity
DK202270189A1 (en) Operating a multi-rotor wind turbine with an energy generating unit positioned in a critical wake region

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18815939

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18815939

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1