WO2025030236A1 - Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef - Google Patents

Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2025030236A1
WO2025030236A1 PCT/CA2024/051021 CA2024051021W WO2025030236A1 WO 2025030236 A1 WO2025030236 A1 WO 2025030236A1 CA 2024051021 W CA2024051021 W CA 2024051021W WO 2025030236 A1 WO2025030236 A1 WO 2025030236A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
aircraft
kneeling
pitch attitude
landing gear
controller
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
PCT/CA2024/051021
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Julien Sedlak
Jose Oliveira
Michael Saccoccia
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Safran Landing Systems Canada Inc
Original Assignee
Safran Landing Systems Canada Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Safran Landing Systems Canada Inc filed Critical Safran Landing Systems Canada Inc
Publication of WO2025030236A1 publication Critical patent/WO2025030236A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00—Alighting gear
    • B64C25/02—Undercarriages
    • B64C25/08—Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable
    • B64C25/10—Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable retractable, foldable, or the like
    • B64C25/14—Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable retractable, foldable, or the like fore-and-aft
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C13/00—Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
    • B64C13/02—Initiating means
    • B64C13/16—Initiating means actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00—Alighting gear
    • B64C25/32—Alighting gear characterised by elements which contact the ground or similar surface 
    • B64C25/58—Arrangements or adaptations of shock-absorbers or springs
    • B64C25/60—Oleo legs
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00—Alighting gear
    • B64C25/001—Devices not provided for in the groups B64C25/02 - B64C25/68
    • B64C2025/008—Comprising means for modifying their length, e.g. for kneeling, for jumping, or for leveling the aircraft

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a pitch attitude control system for increasing aircraft braking efficiency. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to controlling the pitch attitude of an aircraft to create a negative wing angle of attack during aircraft maneuvers where increased braking efficiency is required.
  • Aircraft landing gear commonly utilize wheel brakes to slow and stop the aircraft during ground maneuvers and to assist other braking systems (thrust reversers, lift dump devices — ground and flight spoilers, etc.) to decelerate the aircraft after touch-down during landing or during a rejected takeoff.
  • Typical wheel brakes employ friction materials to provide a resistive torque and to convert kinetic energy to heat.
  • One limiting factor of the maximum braking force available by applying the wheel brakes is the friction between the tires and the runway.
  • the wheel braking efficiency increases as weight of the aircraft increases based on increased normal force between the tires and the runway, thereby increasing the friction coefficient and the available braking force.
  • lift dump devices work to reduce or eliminate the positive lift of the wings and the related decrease in normal force between the tires and the runway, certain aircraft maneuvers may still require additional braking force.
  • an elevated aircraft energy level can affect safety maneuvers of the aircraft, e.g., the final rejected takeoff point, minimum runway length required for landing, etc.
  • the final rejected takeoff point is the last point in time at which a decision can be made to abort the takeoff and safely slow the aircraft back down to taxiing speeds, which is based on the available braking force and runway length.
  • an elevated aircraft energy level as a result of increased takeoff weight and/or high velocity at a given runway length will move the rejected takeoff point earlier than desired, and/or require that the aircraft avoid runways below a certain overall length.
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure can include systems for controlling the pitch attitude of an aircraft while it is on the runway to create a negative wing angle of attack during aircraft maneuvers where increased braking efficiency is required.
  • the systems are configured to selectively create a negative pitch attitude (nose down) by shortening a nose landing gear of the aircraft, extending a main landing gear of the aircraft, or in other embodiments, extending the main landing gear assembly while shortening the nose landing gear.
  • a pitch attitude control system for an aircraft.
  • the pitch attitude control system can include a nose landing gear assembly operably coupled to a body of the aircraft, the nose landing gear assembly having: a tire rotatable with respect to the nose landing gear assembly; and a kneeling system in communication with the pitch attitude control system and being positioned between the body and the tire, the kneeling system having a kneeling cylinder enclosing a pressure chamber and configured to selectively change the distance between the body and the tire such that a pitch attitude of the aircraft changes based on change in pressure within the pressure chamber.
  • the pitch attitude control system can further include a pitch attitude controller configured to change the pressure in the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder in response to receiving a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft, the kneeling signal containing information related to a required attack angle of a wing of the aircraft based on an input amplitude of the kneeling input device, the pitch attitude controller having at least one machine-accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, such as when a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver is initiated by the aircraft, decrease the pressure in the pressure chamber to retract the kneeling system to a retracted position.
  • a pitch attitude control system for an aircraft.
  • the pitch attitude control system can include a nose landing gear assembly operably coupled to a body of the aircraft, the nose landing gear assembly having a tire rotatable with respect to the nose landing gear assembly; and a deployment system in communication with the pitch attitude control system, the deployment system being positioned between the body and the tire and configured to transition the nose landing gear assembly between a stowed position and a deployed position.
  • the pitch attitude control system can further include a pitch attitude controller configured to move the nose landing gear assembly with the deployment system in response to receiving a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft, the kneeling signal containing information related to a required attack angle of a wing of the aircraft based on an input amplitude of the kneeling input device, the pitch attitude controller having at least one machine-accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, such as when a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver is initiated by the aircraft, transition the deployment system partially toward the stowed position to a retracted position.
  • a method of changing a pitch attitude of an aircraft during a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver the aircraft having a kneeling system operably coupled to a nose landing gear assembly, the kneeling system including a kneeling cylinder enclosing a pressure chamber and configured to selectively change the distance between a body of the aircraft and a tire such that the pitch attitude of the aircraft changes based on a change in pressure within the pressure chamber; and a pitch attitude controller in communication with the kneeling system is provided.
  • the method can include determining a required negative angle of attack of a wing of the aircraft during a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver based on the required braking force; receiving, by the pitch attitude controller, a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft; and reducing the pressure in the pressure chamber to retract the kneeling system to a retracted position based on an amplitude of the kneeling signal.
  • the pitch attitude control system can further provide instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, including after the landing maneuver or the rejected takeoff maneuver is completed, increase the pressure in the pressure chamber to extend the kneeling system to an extended position.
  • the nose landing gear assembly can further include a shock absorber positioned between the body and a tire of the nose landing gear assembly, the shock absorber configured to permit relative movement between the tire and the body.
  • the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder can be continuous with a pressure chamber of a shock absorber body.
  • the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder can be slidingly associated with a pressure chamber of a shock absorber body.
  • the attack angle of the wing can be negative when the kneeling system is in the retracted position and the tire is in contact with a ground surface, wherein a negative attack angle of the wing imparts a negative lift force on the aircraft during movement of the aircraft along the ground surface.
  • the aircraft can further include a main landing gear assembly having a friction brake; and a master brake and kneeling system controller in communication with the pitch attitude controller, the master brake and kneeling system controller configured to apply the friction brake in response to receiving a braking signal from an input device of the aircraft, the braking signal containing information related to a maximum braking force of the aircraft based in part on an amplitude of a negative lift force imparted on the aircraft when the kneeling system is in the retracted position and the attack angle of the wing is negative, the master brake and kneeling system controller having at least one machine-accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the master brake and kneeling system controller, can cause the master brake and kneeling system controller to perform operations, such as applying the friction brake up to the maximum braking force.
  • the aircraft can further include a main landing gear assembly having a tire and a main landing gear extension system in communication with the pitch attitude controller and positioned between the body and the tire, the main landing gear extension system configured to extend the distance between the body and the tire to an extended position, wherein the attack angle of the wing can be negative when the main landing gear extension system is in the extended position.
  • the wing can have a greater negative angle of attach when the kneeling system in the retracted position and the main landing gear extension system is in extended position.
  • FIGURE 1A depicts one example of an aircraft, such as a passenger or cargo aircraft, shown in side view and having a neutral pitch attitude, in which technologies and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be employed;
  • FIGURE IB is a side view of the aircraft of FIGURE 1A, showing the aircraft in takeoff and having a positive pitch attitude;
  • FIGURE 1C is a side view of the aircraft of FIGURE 1A, showing the aircraft kneeling and having a negative pitch attitude;
  • FIGURES 2A and 2B is a side view of a nose landing gear kneeling system in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure
  • FIGURE 3 is a functional block diagram of a braking and pitch attitude control system in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, showing a kneeling system in the nose landing gear and friction braking in the main landing gear;
  • FIGURE 4 is a flow chart illustrating a process for operating a pitch attitude control system of an aircraft in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure can include systems for controlling the pitch attitude of an aircraft while it is in contact with the runway to create a negative wing angle of attack during aircraft maneuvers where increased braking efficiency is required.
  • the systems are configured to selectively create a negative pitch attitude (nose down) by shortening a nose landing gear of the aircraft, extending a main landing gear of the aircraft, or in other embodiments, extending the main landing gear assembly while shortening the nose landing gear.
  • the pitch attitude control system can include a kneeling system in the nose landing gear configured to shorten the distance between the aircraft body and the ground surface of a runway.
  • the kneeling system can lower the nose of the aircraft relative to the tail to position the wings in a negative angle of attack relative to the direction of travel of the aircraft.
  • the shape of the wings creates a negative lift (i.e., downforce) that increases the normal force between the tires and the ground surface of the runway, thereby increasing the friction coefficient and the available braking force.
  • the pitch attitude control system can position the wings in a negative angle of attack to increase the braking efficiency of the aircraft. This increase in braking efficiency can shorten the required braking distance during landing, move the final rejected takeoff point further down the runway, increase the speed at which a rejected takeoff can be initiated, reduce the required size of the brake system, among other advantages.
  • FIGURE 1A depicts one example of an aircraft 100, such as a passenger or cargo aircraft, shown in side view and having a neutral pitch attitude, in which technologies and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be employed.
  • the aircraft 100 can include a wing 102, a nose landing gear assembly 110 (“nose landing gear 110”), and a main landing gear assembly 112.
  • the wing 102 is configured to have a neutral or positive lift coefficient as the aircraft 100 travels along the runway.
  • the wing 102 is shown without any flaps, spoilers, or slats deployed, which can affect the lift coefficient and drag of the wing 102.
  • FIGURE IB is a side view of the aircraft 100, showing the aircraft 100 during takeoff or landing and having a positive pitch attitude.
  • the wing 102 has a positive angle of attack and is configured to have a positive lift coefficient creating a positive lift force 120a as the aircraft 100 travels in the direction of the runway.
  • FIGURE 1C is a side view of the aircraft 100, showing the aircraft 100 kneeling in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, such as during landing or a rejected takeoff, where the aircraft 100 has a negative pitch attitude.
  • the wing 102 has a negative angle of attack and is configured to have a negative lift coefficient creating a negative lift force 120b as the aircraft 100 travels in the direction of the runway.
  • the negative lift force 120b is a downforce that increases the normal force between the tires and the ground surface of the runway, thereby increasing the friction coefficient and the available braking force that can be applied without tire slip.
  • the wing 102 creates a drag force in a direction opposite to that of the direction of travel of the aircraft 100.
  • the angle of attack of the wing 102 as shown in FIGURE 1A generally creates a minimum drag force, while changing the angle of attack of the wing 102 in a positive (FIGURE IB) or negative (FIGURE 1C) direction increases the drag force, represented as a drag force 122a in FIGURE IB and a drag force 122b in FIGURE 1C.
  • the drag force created by the wing 102 in a negative angle of attack works to assist the braking system in slowing down the aircraft 100, increasing the efficiency of the braking system.
  • the engine thrust In the positive pitch attitude shown in FIGURE IB, the engine thrust must overcome the drag to propel the aircraft 100 forward.
  • the landing gear assemblies 110 and 112 can include various components configured to support the body of the aircraft 100 above the ground surface, e.g., wheels, additional shock absorbers, brackets, hydraulics, sensors, actuators, controllers, etc., and such components are not shown for the sake of clarity in the FIGURES. It should be appreciated that the aircraft 100 illustrated in FIGURES 1A-1C should not be considered limiting on the present disclosure, and the landing gear systems can be arranged in various other configurations with fewer or additional components as desired. In addition, the particular location of the landing gear systems, the quantity of wheels and tires, and the other aspects of the aircraft 100 illustrated in FIGURES 1A-1C should not be considered limiting on the present disclosure, as the components may be positioned at various locations.
  • FIGURES 2A and 2B are side views of one example of a pitch attitude control system having a nose landing gear kneeling system 111 (“kneeling system 111”) of the nose landing gear 110 of the aircraft 100 in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the kneeling system 111 is an example of a system configured to position the aircraft 100 in the negative pitch attitude shown in FIGURE 1C to create a negative wing angle of attack and the negative downforce to increase braking efficiency, as described above. It should be appreciated that other pitch attitude control systems can be employed in the aircraft 100 and are also within the scope of the present disclosure.
  • FIGURE 2A shows the kneeling system 111 in an extended position and FIGURE 2B shows the kneeling system 111 in a retracted position.
  • the kneeling system 111 is considered active for maximum braking performance maneuvers (e.g., rejected takeoff, landing on a shortened runway, etc.), when the kneeling system 111 retracts from the position shown in FIGURE 2A toward the position shown in FIGURE 2B, with a maximum retraction corresponding to the maximum kneeling position having the maximum negative wing angle of attack.
  • the kneeling system 111 can be positioned at any position between the extended and retracted positions based on the required negative wing angle of attack required by the aircraft 100.
  • the kneeling system may only partially retract.
  • the nose landing gear 110 can include an upper mounting point 130 and a tire 140 configured to contact a ground surface Gl.
  • the kneeling system 111 functions in conjunction with the shock absorbing system of the nose landing gear 110.
  • any type of system to retract the nose landing gear 110 and cause a negative angle of attack of the wing 102 can be used with the technologies described herein and these systems are also within the scope of the present disclosure.
  • the kneeling system can be separated from the shock absorbing system; can be mechanically, electronically, magnetically, and/or hydraulically actuated; can be integrated into the landing gear deployment/retraction system; etc.
  • Embodiments of the kneeling system 111 can include a cylinder 132 slidingly associated with a shock absorbing housing 134 that is configured to receive a sliding rod 136 of the nose landing gear 110 therein.
  • the sliding rod 136 can operably couple the tire 140 to the aircraft through the shock absorbing housing 134, the cylinder 132, and the upper mounting point 130, among other components of the nose landing gear.
  • FIGURE 2A In the extended position of the kneeling system 111 shown in FIGURE 2A, the cylinder 132 is pressurized positively, as represented by an arrow 142a, to apply a force urging the shock absorbing housing 134 away from the upper mounting point 130 to the extended position.
  • the extended position of FIGURE 2A may be used during taxiing, takeoff, storage, and other normal operation of the aircraft 100.
  • the nose landing gear 110 transitions toward the retracted position shown in FIGURE 2B.
  • Activation of the kneeling system 111 causes a reduction in the pressure in a pressure chamber 133 of the cylinder 132 is removed, as represented by an arrow 142b, to either apply a force retracting the shock absorbing housing 134 toward the upper mounting point 130, or permitting the weight of the aircraft 100 to move the shock absorbing housing 134 toward the upper mounting point 130, or a combination thereof.
  • the ground surface G2 is shown at a distance D away from the ground surface Gl shown in FIGURE 2A.
  • FIGURE 3 is a functional block diagram of a braking and pitch attitude control system 301 of the aircraft 100 in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, showing a kneeling system in the nose landing gear 110 and friction braking in the main landing gear assembly 112.
  • the main landing gear assembly 112 can include systems of the pitch attitude control in addition to or instead of the nose landing gear 110, e.g., an extension system for raising the main landing gear assembly 112, thereby affecting the pitch attitude of the aircraft 100.
  • the nose landing gear 110 includes the pitch attitude control.
  • the system 301 includes a master brake and kneeling system controller 320 that is configured to manage braking actuation timing and force and the kneeling function based on various input device signals from the aircraft 100.
  • input device signals sent to and received by the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 are a mechanical brake input device 310 (e.g., hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical, etc. — from a pilot, personnel manipulating an emergency brake lever, or other manually actuated system), a manual kneeling input device 312 (e.g., a switch, lever, etc.
  • an automatic brake and kneeling input device 314 e.g., a signal from an aircraft control system, a potentiometer, a position sensor, an autopilot system, autobraking system, or the like
  • the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 can interpret these signals to interpret the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 to actuate the brakes (e.g., a friction brake 332) and change the pitch attitude of the aircraft 100 with a kneeling system (e.g., the kneeling system 111 of FIGURES 2A and 2B) in accordance with a control scheme of the aircraft 100.
  • the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 can additionally be coupled to various other systems and sensors to provide feedback based on, e.g., wheel speed, brake force requirements, aircraft pitch attitude, tire grip, and other similar aspects. Although the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 is shown as a single block in the diagram of FIGURE 3, the control system may include various separate components that are interconnected to send and receive signals.
  • the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 is coupled to a pitch attitude controller 322 associated with the nose landing gear 110 and configured to control one or more kneeling pressure supplies 324 arranged in the components of the nose landing gear 110.
  • the kneeling pressure supply 324 can send a pressurized fluid or gas (such as in the directions shown by arrows 142a and 142b in FIGURES 2A and 2B), e.g., to the cylinder 132 of the kneeling system 111.
  • the nose landing gear 110 can additionally include braking components, such as friction or eddy current brakes that are additionally controlled by the master brake and kneeling system controller 320.
  • the master brake and kneeling system controller 320 can further be coupled to a friction brake controller 330 associated with the main landing gear assembly 112 and configured to control one or more friction brakes 332 arranged in the components of the main landing gear assembly 112.
  • the main landing gear assembly 112 can include any number of wheels and tires that can individually include a friction brake 332.
  • FIGURE 4 shows a flow chart illustrating a process 400 for operation of a braking and pitch attitude control system 301, e.g., for the aircraft 100 having the kneeling system 111, in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.
  • the order in which some or all of the process blocks appear in process 400 should not be deemed limiting. Rather, one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the present disclosure will understand that some of the process blocks may be executed in a variety of orders not illustrated, or even in parallel.
  • the pitch attitude control system is initiated.
  • the pitch attitude control system can be initiated upon system startup of the aircraft, when the process 400 senses that pitch attitude control is required (manual or automatic input), or when the aircraft is in a mode where pitch attitude control is active (e.g., rejected takeoff or landing maneuvers).
  • the process 400 can decide whether the aircraft is in a rejected takeoff maneuver or a landing maneuver. For example, before the aircraft initiates a rejected takeoff maneuver, the kneeling system 111 will be in the extended position for takeoff to impart positive lift on the aircraft by the wing 102. Similarly, before the aircraft is in a landing maneuver, the nose landing gear 110 will be in a stowed position, or a deployed position without the kneeling system 111 retracted.
  • the process 400 advances to a process block 415 where the pressure of the kneeling system 111 is reduced to translate the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position (e.g., as shown in FIGURE 2B).
  • pressure can be removed from the pressure chamber 133 of the cylinder 132 in the direction of the arrow 142b to transition the kneeling system 111 from the extended position (FIGURE 2A) to the retracted position (FIGURE 2B) and cause the wing 102 to have a negative angle of attack, thereby increasing downforce of the aircraft 100 and the normal force of the tires 140 on the runway, maximizing braking efficiency.
  • the pilot may apply the braking system to a maximum level based on current grip of the tires 140 of the runway during translation of the kneeling system 111 of the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position, at which point the grip of the tires 140 on the runway will increase, thereby allowing an increased maximum application level of the braking system.
  • the increased application of the braking system upon transition of the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position can be automated based on the increased grip of the tire 140 based on, e.g., a sensor and tone wheel measuring tire slip, a load sensor measuring the downforce of the wing 102, or the like, or any combination thereof.
  • the process 400 advances to a decision block 420 where the kneeling system 111 can be initiated in the air or on the ground during landing.
  • the process 400 advances to a process block 425 where the nose landing gear 110 is deployed while the kneeling system 111 transitions the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position (FIGURE 2B), or the nose landing gear 110 is deployed fully and then the kneeling system 111 transitions the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position. In either configuration, it is intended that the nose landing gear 110 is in the retracted position of FIGURE 2B prior to the tire 140 of the nose landing gear 110 contacting the runway.
  • the process 400 advances to a process block 430 where the nose landing gear 110 is deployed and the tire 140 contact the runway during the landing maneuver. Upon contact between the tire 140 in the runway, the process 400 advances to a process block 435 where the pressure of the kneeling system 111 is reduced to translate the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position (FIGURE 2B).
  • pressure can be removed from the cylinder 132 in the direction of the arrow 142b to transition the kneeling system 111 from the extended position (FIGURE 2A) to the retracted position (FIGURE 2B) and cause the wing 102 to have a negative angle of attack, thereby increasing downforce of the aircraft 100 and the normal force of the tires 140 on the runway, maximizing braking efficiency.
  • the pilot may apply the braking system to a maximum level based on current grip of the tires 140 of the runway during translation of the kneeling system 111 of the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position, at which point the grip of the tires 140 on the runway will increase, thereby allowing an increased maximum application level of the braking system.
  • the increased application of the braking system upon transition of the nose landing gear 110 to the retracted position can be automated based on the increased grip of the tire 140 based on, e.g., a sensor and tone wheel measuring tire slip, a load sensor measuring the downforce of the wing 102, or the like, or any combination thereof. It will be appreciated that other control schemes are within the scope of the present disclosure.
  • a pitch attitude control system for an aircraft comprising: a nose landing gear assembly operably coupled to a body of the aircraft, the nose landing gear assembly having: a tire rotatable with respect to the nose landing gear assembly; and a kneeling system in communication with the pitch attitude control system and being positioned between the body and the tire, the kneeling system having a kneeling cylinder enclosing a pressure chamber and configured to selectively change a distance between the body and the tire such that a pitch attitude of the aircraft changes based on change in pressure within the pressure chamber; and a pitch attitude controller configured to change the pressure in the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder in response to receiving a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft, the kneeling signal containing information related to a required attack angle of a wing of the aircraft based on an input amplitude of the kneeling input device, the pitch attitude controller having at least one machine-accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, comprising: when a
  • EC B The pitch attitude control system of EC A, further providing instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, comprising: after the landing maneuver or the rejected takeoff maneuver is completed, increase the pressure in the pressure chamber to extend the kneeling system to an extended position.
  • EC C The pitch attitude control system of EC A, wherein the nose landing gear assembly further comprises a shock absorber positioned between the body and a tire of the nose landing gear assembly, the shock absorber configured to permit relative movement between the tire and the body.
  • EC D The pitch attitude control system of EC C, wherein the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder is continuous with a pressure chamber of a shock absorber body.
  • EC E The pitch attitude control system of EC C, wherein the pressure chamber of the kneeling cylinder is slidingly associated with a pressure chamber of a shock absorber body.
  • EC F The pitch attitude control system of EC A, wherein the attack angle of the wing is negative when the kneeling system is in the retracted position and the tire is in contact with a ground surface, wherein a negative attack angle of the wing imparts a negative lift force on the aircraft during movement of the aircraft along the ground surface.
  • the pitch attitude control system of EC A wherein the aircraft further comprises: a main landing gear assembly having a friction brake; and a master brake and kneeling system controller in communication with the pitch attitude controller, the master brake and kneeling system controller configured to apply the friction brake in response to receiving a braking signal from an input device of the aircraft, the braking signal containing information related to a maximum braking force of the aircraft based in part on an amplitude of a negative lift force imparted on the aircraft when the kneeling system is in the retracted position and the attack angle of the wing is negative, the master brake and kneeling system controller having at least one machine- accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the master brake and kneeling system controller, will cause the master brake and kneeling system controller to perform operations, comprising: applying the friction brake up to the maximum braking force.
  • EC H The pitch attitude control system of EC A, wherein the aircraft further comprises a main landing gear assembly having a tire and a main landing gear extension system in communication with the pitch attitude controller and positioned between the body and the tire, the main landing gear extension system configured to extend the distance between the body and the tire to an extended position, wherein the attack angle of the wing is negative when the main landing gear extension system is in the extended position.
  • a pitch attitude control system for an aircraft comprising: a nose landing gear assembly operably coupled to a body of the aircraft, the nose landing gear assembly having: a tire rotatable with respect to the nose landing gear assembly; and a deployment system in communication with the pitch attitude control system, the deployment system being positioned between the body and the tire and configured to transition the nose landing gear assembly between a stowed position and a deployed position; and a pitch attitude controller configured to move the nose landing gear assembly with the deployment system in response to receiving a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft, the kneeling signal containing information related to a required attack angle of a wing of the aircraft based on an input amplitude of the kneeling input device, the pitch attitude controller having at least one machine-accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, comprising: when a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver is initiated by the aircraft, transition the deployment system partially toward the stowed position to a retracted position.
  • EC K The pitch attitude control system of EC J, further providing instructions that, when executed by the pitch attitude controller, will cause the pitch attitude controller to perform operations, comprising: after the landing maneuver or the rejected takeoff maneuver is completed, transition the deployment system from the retracted position to the deployed position.
  • EC L The pitch attitude control system of EC J, wherein the nose landing gear assembly further comprises a shock absorber positioned between the body and a tire of the nose landing gear assembly, the shock absorber configured to permit relative movement between the tire and the body.
  • EC M The pitch attitude control system of EC J, wherein the attack angle of the wing is negative when the deployment system is in the retracted position and the tire is in contact with a ground surface, wherein a negative attack angle of the wing imparts a negative lift force on the aircraft during movement of the aircraft along the ground surface.
  • EC N The pitch attitude control system of EC J, wherein the attack angle of the wing is negative when the deployment system is in the retracted position and the tire is in contact with a ground surface, wherein a negative attack angle of the wing imparts a negative lift force on the aircraft during movement of the aircraft along the ground surface.
  • the pitch attitude control system of EC J wherein the aircraft further comprises: a main landing gear assembly having a friction brake; and a master brake and kneeling system controller in communication with the pitch attitude controller, the master brake and kneeling system controller configured to apply the friction brake in response to receiving a braking signal from an input device of the aircraft, the braking signal containing information related to a maximum braking force of the aircraft based in part on an amplitude of a negative lift force imparted on the aircraft when the deployment system is in the retracted position and the attack angle of the wing is negative, the master brake and kneeling system controller having at least one machine- accessible storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the master brake and kneeling system controller, will cause the master brake and kneeling system controller to perform operations, comprising: applying the friction brake up to the maximum braking force.
  • EC O The pitch attitude control system of EC J, wherein the aircraft further comprises a main landing gear assembly having a tire and a main landing gear extension system in communication with the pitch attitude controller and positioned between the body and the tire, the main landing gear extension system configured to extend the distance between the body and the tire to an extended position, wherein the attack angle of the wing is negative when the main landing gear extension system is in the extended position.
  • EC P The pitch attitude control system of EC O, wherein the wing has a greater negative angle of attach when the deployment system of the nose landing gear is in the retracted position and the main landing gear extension system is in extended position.
  • a method of changing a pitch attitude of an aircraft during a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver the aircraft having: a kneeling system operably coupled to a nose landing gear assembly, the kneeling system including a kneeling cylinder enclosing a pressure chamber and configured to selectively change the distance between a body of the aircraft and a tire such that the pitch attitude of the aircraft changes based on a change in pressure within the pressure chamber; and a pitch attitude controller in communication with the kneeling system, the method comprising: determining a required negative angle of attack of a wing of the aircraft during a landing maneuver or a rejected takeoff maneuver based on the required braking force; receiving, by the pitch attitude controller, a kneeling signal from an input device of the aircraft; and reducing the pressure in the pressure chamber to retract the kneeling system to a retracted position based on an amplitude of the kneeling signal.
  • EC R The method of EC Q, wherein during a landing maneuver, the method further comprises: determining whether the kneeling signal is initiated when the aircraft is in the air or on the ground; if the kneeling signal is initiated when the aircraft is in the air, deploying the nose landing gear assembly with the kneeling system in the retracted position; and if the kneeling signal is initiated when the aircraft is on the ground, reducing the pressure in the pressure chamber to retract the kneeling system to a retracted position based on an amplitude of the kneeling signal.
  • EC S The method of EC Q, further comprising increasing the pressure in the pressure chamber to extend the kneeling system to an extended position after the landing maneuver or the rejected takeoff maneuver is completed.
  • EC T The method of EC Q, wherein the aircraft further includes a main landing gear assembly having a friction brake, and wherein the method further comprises: receiving a braking signal from an input device of the aircraft, the braking signal containing information related to a maximum braking force of the aircraft based in part on an amplitude of a negative lift force imparted on the aircraft when the kneeling system is in the retracted position and the attack angle of the wing is negative; and applying the friction brake up to the maximum braking force in response to the braking signal.
  • the present application may reference quantities and numbers. Unless specifically stated, such quantities and numbers are not to be considered restrictive, but exemplary of the possible quantities or numbers associated with the present application. Also in this regard, the present application may use the term “plurality” to reference a quantity or number. In this regard, the term “plurality” is meant to be any number that is more than one, for example, two, three, four, five, etc. The terms “about,” “approximately,” “near,” etc. , mean plus or minus 10% of the stated value.
  • the phrase “at least one of A and B” is equivalent to “A and/or B” or vice versa, namely “A” alone, “B” alone or “A and B.”
  • the phrase “at least one of A, B, and C,” for example, means (A), (B), (C), (A and B), (A and C), (B and C), or (A, B, and C), including all further possible permutations when greater than three elements are listed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Regulating Braking Force (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système et un procédé de commande de l'assiette en tangage d'un aéronef. Le système peut comprendre un système de baraquage couplé de manière fonctionnelle à un ensemble train d'atterrissage avant et configuré pour positionner l'aile de l'aéronef selon un angle d'attaque négatif, conférant ainsi une force de portance négative sur l'aéronef. Le système de baraquage peut être commandé par un dispositif de commande d'assiette en tangage configuré pour modifier la pression dans une chambre de pression d'un cylindre de baraquage en réaction à un signal de baraquage de l'aéronef. Le signal peut comprendre des informations relatives à un angle d'attaque négatif requis de l'aile sur la base de la force de freinage requise de l'aéronef. Le système de baraquage peut être utilisé pendant des manœuvres de décollage refusé pour diminuer la distance d'arrêt, ce qui permet d'augmenter le point final auquel le décollage refusé peut être initié, et peut être utilisé pour diminuer la longueur de piste requise pendant l'atterrissage.
PCT/CA2024/051021 2023-08-10 2024-08-01 Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef Pending WO2025030236A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CAPCT/CA2023/051068 2023-08-10
PCT/CA2023/051068 WO2025030231A1 (fr) 2023-08-10 2023-08-10 Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2025030236A1 true WO2025030236A1 (fr) 2025-02-13

Family

ID=94533118

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2023/051068 Pending WO2025030231A1 (fr) 2023-08-10 2023-08-10 Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef
PCT/CA2024/051021 Pending WO2025030236A1 (fr) 2023-08-10 2024-08-01 Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2023/051068 Pending WO2025030231A1 (fr) 2023-08-10 2023-08-10 Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (2) WO2025030231A1 (fr)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1716439A (en) * 1926-10-25 1929-06-11 Gray William Edrington Undercarriage for aeroplanes
US2764371A (en) * 1954-04-13 1956-09-25 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Apparatus for landing aircraft
US5509623A (en) * 1994-06-15 1996-04-23 Freewing Aerial Robotics Corporation Free wing aircraft having a free wing used as an air brake to shorten roll-out following touchdown
US20090065636A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2009-03-12 Airbus France Method and device for enhancing the braking efficiency of an aircraft during the ground run thereof
FR3018501A1 (fr) * 2014-03-16 2015-09-18 Socata Dispositif et procede pour le controle actif du train d’atterrissage d’un aeronef
US20180015997A1 (en) * 2016-07-13 2018-01-18 Embraer S.A. Use of automatic pitch control to improve braking performance
US20210206475A1 (en) * 2020-01-07 2021-07-08 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft landing with elevator down force assistance during braking

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1716439A (en) * 1926-10-25 1929-06-11 Gray William Edrington Undercarriage for aeroplanes
US2764371A (en) * 1954-04-13 1956-09-25 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Apparatus for landing aircraft
US5509623A (en) * 1994-06-15 1996-04-23 Freewing Aerial Robotics Corporation Free wing aircraft having a free wing used as an air brake to shorten roll-out following touchdown
US20090065636A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2009-03-12 Airbus France Method and device for enhancing the braking efficiency of an aircraft during the ground run thereof
FR3018501A1 (fr) * 2014-03-16 2015-09-18 Socata Dispositif et procede pour le controle actif du train d’atterrissage d’un aeronef
US20180015997A1 (en) * 2016-07-13 2018-01-18 Embraer S.A. Use of automatic pitch control to improve braking performance
US20210206475A1 (en) * 2020-01-07 2021-07-08 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft landing with elevator down force assistance during braking

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2025030231A1 (fr) 2025-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2455283B1 (fr) Actionneur hydraulique pour train d'atterrissage d'un avion comprenant un balancier, un amortisseur principal et un amortisseur auxiliaire
US8186620B2 (en) Adjustable landing gear system
US11787529B2 (en) Aircraft landing gear
US8276843B2 (en) Variable stroke rear landing gear strut
EP2748063B1 (fr) Train d'atterrissage d'aéronef
WO2015025131A1 (fr) Refoulement autonome d'aéronef
US11014654B2 (en) Pitch trimmer
US9688393B2 (en) Aircraft auxiliary drive wheel taxi system
US7963481B2 (en) Method and device for supporting the take-off rotation of an aircraft
CN109774926B (zh) 高超飞行器轮撬组合起降装置
US20170355452A1 (en) Aircraft landing gear, aircraft carrying such and methods
US4651955A (en) Device for automatically controllable unloading of aircraft wings
WO2025030236A1 (fr) Système de commande d'assiette en tangage pour augmenter l'efficacité de freinage d'aéronef
US8340838B2 (en) Differential braking system
CN113602486A (zh) 小车式起落架及飞行器
US12172619B2 (en) Brake control system
US3162403A (en) Air vehicle carriage gear assembly
Tunca et al. Landing Gear Systems in Aircraft
US7815143B2 (en) Aircraft landing gear truck orientation for noise reduction
Liseitsev Landing Gear Design
GB2640640A (en) Aircraft landing gear
CN113844643A (zh) 前轮转弯减载机构
GB2625544A (en) Aircraft braking system
Barfield Fifty years of landing gear development: a survey of the pioneering contribution to aircraft undercarriage development made by Vickers and BAC at Weybridge

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 24850412

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2024850412

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE