EP0922246B1 - Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique - Google Patents

Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0922246B1
EP0922246B1 EP97942756A EP97942756A EP0922246B1 EP 0922246 B1 EP0922246 B1 EP 0922246B1 EP 97942756 A EP97942756 A EP 97942756A EP 97942756 A EP97942756 A EP 97942756A EP 0922246 B1 EP0922246 B1 EP 0922246B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
plant
determined
performance
parts
performance characteristic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97942756A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0922246A1 (fr
Inventor
Hans-Gerd Mederer
Alexander Politiadis-Behrens
Hermann Ilmberger
Jürgen Schmitz
Sabine THÜRMEL
Matthias Reich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7804083&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0922246(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens AG, Siemens Corp filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP0922246A1 publication Critical patent/EP0922246A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0922246B1 publication Critical patent/EP0922246B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0283—Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL]
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01K—STEAM ENGINE PLANTS; STEAM ACCUMULATORS; ENGINE PLANTS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; ENGINES USING SPECIAL WORKING FLUIDS OR CYCLES
    • F01K13/00—General layout or general methods of operation of complete plants
    • F01K13/02—Controlling, e.g. stopping or starting

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for analyzing a Process state of a technical system, its system parts are automatically monitored and controlled.
  • the technical system it can in particular be a power plant act.
  • the operating staff of the power plant is in front of the Task, the relevant measurement data for the operating state or identify measurands and relate their values to track on the condition of the plant, to analyze and interpret.
  • the operating staff is usually provided in the control technology of the power plant Information filters that are archived or supported measurement data or measurement variables relevant to the current system status display. The vast majority of the total measured data or measured quantities is usually electronically logged.
  • a fault that occurs in the plant process usually leads in a number of system parts to a deviation of the Actual state from the target state.
  • Deviations provided by detectors then give fault reports from.
  • the fault reports can - just like Measured values or messages relating to the plant process - in be displayed to the control room. Using reporting elements there it is possible for the operating personnel who Identify disorder.
  • the Functional descriptions are in the form of function plans laid down.
  • the function plans can total consist of several 10,000 pages.
  • In the function plans is in Form of cross references and arithmetic as well as logical Operations of the interdependency of the plant components are stored.
  • the operating personnel is therefore faced with the problem, the malfunction without direct obvious information about indirect effects the disturbance on the interrelation of the plant components to fix. To do this, the operating personnel must have the Disruption and the resulting effects on the Recognize and evaluate process flow. Because the necessary information can only be determined using the function plans However, such an analysis is only possible with a high degree Effort and also with high demands on the operating personnel possible. In addition, the operating staff is standing straight in the event of an accident under enormous time pressure. Further This analysis depends very much on knowledge, intuition as well the current stress situation of the operating personnel.
  • the invention is therefore based on the object of a method specify with which a process state is particularly simple and quick can be analyzed. This is said to be a particularly accurate one Estimation of the impact of a disturbance on the overall process enable.
  • This object is achieved with a method to analyze a process status of a technical system, whose system parts are automatically monitored and controlled, in which a characteristic of a selected plant part Performance characteristic based on a number to this selected plant part associated process signals and based of those performance characteristics that match those with the selected Plant part related to other plant parts are assigned is determined.
  • the invention is based on the consideration that the process state from an analysis of the interaction of the process characterizing plant parts can be determined. This is the interaction or interaction of the system parts through reactions of individual system parts depending of the reactions of the respective influencing system parts certainly. Accordingly, the function or the task of each part of the system through the interaction of several interconnected system components influencing him dependent. It can be based on analytical Compare, especially in terms of software, for everyone Part of the system the current actual state depending on the influencing neighboring plant parts can be determined. The new process now results for the plant part a characteristic value that shows the dependency and the causal relationship of the plant part included and evaluated.
  • the impact or influence of the selected part of the system in every part of the plant influenced by him to be able to, is the performance characteristic of the plant part by means of an associated analysis module to the analysis module of the other plant part influenced by him. This can be done, for example, via a data transmission unit or via cross-references within a computer program.
  • the functional relationship of the system parts expediently results from a functional description.
  • the functional description e.g. Function plans, lies in a form that can be used for data processing.
  • Each function plan includes one analogously to a subroutine Computer program a small number of logical with each other linked process steps of the plant process and thus the type of connection of the system parts.
  • the performance characteristic of the selected plant section particularly quickly and The key performance indicator in the corresponding computer unit of the system part determined decentrally.
  • the performance characteristic can be independent from the decentralized structure of the power plant be determined centrally.
  • the determined performance characteristic as well as those performance characteristics that the in relation to the selected performance characteristic are assigned to other stationary plant parts.
  • the saved Performance indicators then to forecast a future one Performance characteristic of the selected plant part used.
  • the determined group performance characteristic is also analogous to this saved.
  • the saved group performance characteristic then becomes a forecast for a future Group performance characteristic of the function group used.
  • forecasts enable the operating personnel to be on time before a system malfunction, in the event of a drop in performance or at take countermeasures in the event of a performance or disposal bottleneck to be able to.
  • the forecasts can be intended Interventions and measures in the process on their Effects on process flow and status are checked.
  • the determined performance characteristic and / or the group performance characteristic graphically on a display device, e.g. on a screen or a waiting board shown. This can be done, for example, using bar charts as well as color changes of the plant part Reporting element take place.
  • the advantages achieved with the invention are in particular in that for the operating personnel by determining the performance ratio, the causal relationship and the Influence of the system components among themselves and their effects evaluated on a sub-process as well as on the overall process become.
  • a characteristic quantity stands for one secure operational management or for a forecast for operational management to disposal.
  • the graphic representation a particularly simple tracking of the determined values guarantees the impact of a malfunction on the process flow.
  • compaction of the determined Summary of performance characteristics of several system parts global statements about the state of subprocesses as well be made of the whole process.
  • Figure 1 is schematically a power plant, special a gas and steam turbine plant 1, hereinafter as a whole plant 1 is shown. This includes one Gas turbine 2 and one of these connected downstream on the flue gas side Heat recovery steam generator 4, whose heating surfaces in the water-steam cycle 6 of a steam turbine 8 are connected.
  • the process system 10 can in particular a personal computer or other data processing device his.
  • the process system 10 is based on the current or online recorded measured values MW and message signals MS and the control signals Si relevant process signals PS for the plant process generated. These process signals PS and other information about measurement, regulation and control events as well as about the signal generation are stored in the information system 10b, e.g. in a message archive 12.
  • the message archive 12 are on the one hand the current state and on the other hand dynamic messages, e.g. Malfunction reports, the power plant process deposited.
  • Functional descriptions of the entire system 1 are in Form of function plans FUP in a memory block 14 of the Information system 10b electronically stored. Stand there the function plans FUP in one for data processing usable form, e.g. in chained data structures, for Available.
  • the information system 10b a predetermined number of analysis modules M1 to Mm (m ⁇ N), Ma to Mz, M.
  • the plant process is in the individual function plans and sub-processes of the overall system 1 as a system structure or system structure 20 shown.
  • the system structure is easy to solve for the system process 20 into a selected number of sub-functions or functional groups Fa to Fz and in one of the plant process dependent number of system parts A1 to Am (m ⁇ N) for easy identification of interdependencies within the plant process structured.
  • the function group Fa represents the component water-steam cycle 6
  • the plant parts A2 to A5 includes.
  • the system parts A2 to A5 represent pumps and not shown Tube.
  • the system structure 20 is in the form of cross references and arithmetic and logic operations detailed in the Function plans FBD stored.
  • Each plant section A1 to Am and each functional group Fa to Fz can also, depending on its own Structure an associated number of function plans FBD in the sense of detailed plans or subsets of plans.
  • the function diagrams FBD can be changed by appropriate Software tools in a simplified topological Structure for the representation of the system structure 20 implemented become.
  • each system part A1 to Am In order to analyze the interrelationship of the system parts A1 to To be able to perform on the function groups Fa to Fz is for each system part A1 to Am and for each functional group Fa to Fz and a corresponding for the entire system 1 Analysis module M1 to Mm or Ma to Mz or M generated.
  • the task of each analysis module M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz, M is an associated performance parameter L1 to Lm (m ⁇ N) or La to Lz or L on the basis of the associated Function plans FBD and the corresponding process signals PS to investigate.
  • the condition of the plant part A5, e.g. a pump, will be in Characterized by the example of a measured pressure.
  • the M5 analysis module reads the corresponding one Process signal PS from the message archive 12 and evaluated by a comparison with a stored reference or Setpoint value the condition or quality of the plant part A5. This quality can be expressed as a percentage from 0 to 100% or as a parameter in a closed interval from 0 to 1. Evaluation of the quality of the Plant part A5 can be in several stages as well as on the Basis of several process signals PS and is a pure local size related to the respective plant part A5. About that In addition, the respective quality can be assessed Limit values, e.g. Tolerance, warning, alarm values, the corresponding Process signals PS can be integrated as required.
  • Limit values e.g. Tolerance, warning, alarm values
  • the M5 analysis module reads from the corresponding ones Function plans FBD the technical interconnection - the logical Linking - the plant part A5 with the influencing Plant parts A3 and A4. Analogous to the logical link the system components A1 to Am are logically linked the performance characteristics L1 to Lm.
  • the influencing Plant parts A3 or A4 will be the corresponding one Performance characteristic value L3 or L4 transmitted to the analysis module M5.
  • the M5 analysis module uses the logical link to determine the performance characteristics L3 and L4 as well as the locally assessed Quality the corresponding performance characteristic L5 for the plant part A5.
  • an "or" link as a maximum formation the corresponding performance parameters L1 to Lm, La until Lz can be realized.
  • the calculation for a "and" link can be used as averaging e.g. as an arithmetic Mean or as weighted averaging, the corresponding Performance characteristics L1 to Lm, La to Lz realized become.
  • the locally rated quality can be included in the calculation of the performance characteristic L1 to Lm, La to Lz as averaging or as a factor. For the plant part A1 without an upstream system part A2 to Am the associated performance characteristic L1 is only based on the quality assessed locally.
  • the performance value determined in this way is L1 to Lm, La to Lz a measure of the availability or the risk to the corresponding plant section A1 to Am, the functional group Fa to Fz or the entire system 1 taking into account the Interaction of the system parts A1 to Am or the functional groups Fa to Fz.
  • the performance characteristic L1 to Lm, La to Lz can not only be used for a plant part A1 to Am, but also for the functional group Fa to Fz or the entire system 1 can be determined.
  • a predetermined one is made on the basis of the system structure 20 Number of system parts A1 to Am to a functional group Fa to Fz summarized. Based on the corresponding Performance characteristics L1 to Lm of the associated system parts A1 to Am becomes a performance measure or group performance measure La to Lz of the associated functional groups Fa to Fz determined.
  • the performance characteristics L1 to Lm, La to Lz can up to a single performance value L for the entire system 1 are compressed.
  • the performance characteristics L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L can be determined centrally or decentrally.
  • the performance parameters L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L in the respective decentralized sub-device of the information system 10b determined.
  • the transfer of the performance parameters L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L then usually does not occur Data transmission devices shown, e.g. via bus systems.
  • the performance parameters can be added or alternatively L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L of course determined centrally become.
  • each performance parameter L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L via the associated analysis module M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz, or M can be determined, for example depending on the requirements of the operating personnel, only performance parameters L1 to Lm, La to Lz of critical system parts A1 to Am or function groups Fa to Fz determined and monitored become.
  • analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz activated, the critical system parts A1 to Am or the critical functional groups Fa to Fz are assigned.
  • the analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz the critical system parts A1 to Am or the critical Determine function groups Fa to Fz using the one described above Procedure the influencing plant parts A1 to Am or the influencing functional groups Fa to Fz.
  • Their analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz are also activated, so that the respective performance characteristics L1 to Lm, La to Lz to the analysis module M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz of the critical Plant section A1 to Am or the critical functional groups Fa to Fz can be transmitted.
  • the activation from analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz is continued until until all influencing plant parts A1 to Am or Function groups Fa bis.Fz are identified.
  • the activation of the analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz, M can, for example, by the operating personnel by command or but also automatically by triggering a signal in the automation or information system 10a, 10b. Analogously to this, the analysis modules M1 can be deactivated to Mm, Ma to Mz, M if there is no need for information consists.
  • Permanent monitoring of sub-processes or the whole Plant process can be activated by constant activation of the corresponding or all analysis modules M1 to Mm, Ma to Mz, M be guaranteed.
  • the system structure 20 described above is in the form of an image 22 of the state of the overall system 1 shown as it is for example in a not shown Control room displayed on a screen or as a control room picture can be.
  • the respective performance characteristics L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L des corresponding plant section A1 to Am or the functional group Fa to Fz are each in the form of a bar B1 to Bm (m ⁇ N), Ba to Bz, B.
  • a bar B1 to Bm m ⁇ N
  • Ba to Bz B
  • a suitable one Color signaling can be used.
  • the plant part changes A1 to Am or the functional group Fa to Fz in the Representation of its color depending on the corresponding Performance characteristic L1 to Lm, La to Lz, L.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)

Claims (9)

  1. Procédé d'analyse d'un état des opérations dans une installation (1) technique, dont des parties (A1 à Am) d'installation sont surveillées/ou commandées automatiquement, dans lequel on détermine une valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance, caractérisant une partie (A1 à Am) de l'installation sélectionnée, au moyen d'un certain nombre de signaux (PS) opératoires appartenant à cette partie (A1 à Am) d'installation sélectionnée et au moyen des valeurs (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance qui sont associées aux autres parties (A1 à Am) d'installation coopérant avec la partie (A1 à Am) d'installation sélectionnée.
  2. Procédé suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel la valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance de la partie (A1 à Am) d'installation sélectionnée est transmise au moyen d'un module (M1 à Mm) d'analyse correspondant au module (M1 à Mm) d'analyse de l'autre partie (A1 à Am) d'installation qu'il influence.
  3. Procédé suivant la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel la coopération des parties (A1 à Am) d'installation est prescrite au moyen d'une prescription (FUP) technique de fonctionnement.
  4. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel la valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique- de puissance de la partie (A1 à Am) d'installation sélectionnée est déterminée de manière centralisée et/ou décentralisée.
  5. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel un nombre prescrit de parties (A1 à Am) d'installation est rassemblé en un groupe (Fa à Fz) fonctionnel et dans lequel au moyen des valeurs (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance des parties (A1 à Am) d'installation de ce groupe (Fa à Fz) de fonctions, on détermine une valeur (La à Lz) caractéristique de puissance de groupe.
  6. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel on mémorise la valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance qui est déterminée, ainsi que les valeurs (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance qui sont associées aux autres parties (A1 à Am) d'installation coopérant avec la partie (A1 à Am) d'installation sélectionnée et dans lequel au moyen des valeurs (L1 à Lm) de caractéristique de puissance mémorisées, on détermine un pronostic pour une valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance future de la partie (A1 à Am) d'installation.
  7. Procédé suivant la revendication 5 ou 6, dans lequel on mémorise la valeur (La à Lz) caractéristique de puissance de groupe qui est déterminée et dans lequel au moyen de la valeur (La à Lz) de caractéristique de puissance de groupe qui est mémorisée, on détermine un pronostic pour une valeur (La à Lz) future caractéristique de puissance de groupe du groupe (Fa à Fz) fonctionnel.
  8. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 7, dans lequel la valeur (L1 à Lm) caractéristique de puissance qui est déterminée est représentée sur un dispositif d'affichage.
  9. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 5 à 8, dans lequel la valeur (La à Lz) caractéristique de puissance de groupe qui est déterminée est représentée sur un dispositif d'affichage.
EP97942756A 1996-08-29 1997-08-28 Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique Expired - Lifetime EP0922246B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19635033A DE19635033A1 (de) 1996-08-29 1996-08-29 Verfahren zur Analyse eines Prozeßzustandes einer technischen Anlage
DE19635033 1996-08-29
PCT/DE1997/001882 WO1998009205A1 (fr) 1996-08-29 1997-08-28 Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0922246A1 EP0922246A1 (fr) 1999-06-16
EP0922246B1 true EP0922246B1 (fr) 2001-07-11

Family

ID=7804083

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97942756A Expired - Lifetime EP0922246B1 (fr) 1996-08-29 1997-08-28 Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0922246B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE203112T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE19635033A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2160365T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO1998009205A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1749727B (zh) * 2004-09-15 2010-09-29 通用电气公司 一种以低成本评估汽轮机性能的方法

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1312549C (zh) 1995-02-13 2007-04-25 英特特拉斯特技术公司 用于安全交易管理和电子权利保护的系统和方法
DE19825733B4 (de) * 1998-06-09 2007-04-26 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Verarbeitung von Prozeßsignalen einer technischen Anlage
EP1189126B1 (fr) * 2000-09-14 2006-06-28 Sulzer Markets and Technology AG Procédé de surveillance d'une installation
US6587737B2 (en) 2000-09-14 2003-07-01 Sulzer Makert And Technology Ag Method for the monitoring of a plant
GB0325560D0 (en) * 2003-10-31 2003-12-03 Seebyte Ltd Intelligent integrated diagnostics
DE102004024809A1 (de) * 2004-05-17 2005-12-08 E.On Ruhrgas Ag Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Mehrzahl von Gasanlagen
DE102009020151A1 (de) * 2009-05-06 2010-11-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur Ermittlung und Bewertung von Kenngrößen einer elektrischen Energieversorgung
DE102009033605B4 (de) * 2009-07-17 2011-03-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur Simulation eines Betriebes einer technischen Anlage anhand von Zustandsgrößen
DE102011084321A1 (de) * 2011-10-12 2013-04-18 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Kommunikationseinheit mit Informationsdarstellung basierend auf Anlagenstruktur
EP2674581A1 (fr) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Composants de machine d'une chaîne cinématique ainsi que la méthode de conception et/ou de mettre en service et/ou d'opération d'une telle chaîne cinématique

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0612039B1 (fr) * 1993-02-15 1999-10-27 Babcock-Hitachi Kabushiki Kaisha Procédé et système de maintenance préventive pour des composants d'une installation
US5448722A (en) * 1993-03-10 1995-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for data processing system error diagnosis utilizing hierarchical blackboard diagnostic sessions
DE4438854C2 (de) * 1994-11-02 1996-12-12 Siemens Ag Überwachungssystem für eine technische Anlage
DE19517104A1 (de) * 1995-05-10 1996-11-14 Istec Gmbh Verfahren zur Zustandsüberwachung dynamischer Rauschprozesse
DE19532927A1 (de) * 1995-08-18 1997-02-20 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Störungsablaufdokumentation in einem Kraftwerk

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1749727B (zh) * 2004-09-15 2010-09-29 通用电气公司 一种以低成本评估汽轮机性能的方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0922246A1 (fr) 1999-06-16
ES2160365T3 (es) 2001-11-01
DE59704028D1 (de) 2001-08-16
DE19635033A1 (de) 1998-03-12
WO1998009205A1 (fr) 1998-03-05
ATE203112T1 (de) 2001-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE4438859C2 (de) Verfahren zur Analyse von Prozeßdaten einer technischen Anlage
DE102017107284B4 (de) Verfahren und steuergerät zum überwachen eines bordnetzes eines fahrzeugs
DE112016003171B4 (de) Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Antriebseinheit einer Fahrzeugkarosseriemontagelinie und eine Vorrichtung dafür
DE4438854C2 (de) Überwachungssystem für eine technische Anlage
EP2706422B1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance assistée par ordinateur du fonctionnement d'un système technique, en particulier d'une installation de production d'énergie électrique
EP0922246B1 (fr) Procede pour l'analyse d'un etat de processus dans une installation technique
EP0643345A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de traitement de données pour la surveillance des conditions de fonctionnement d'une installation technique
EP2927819B1 (fr) Procede de traitement automatique de plusieurs fichiers journaux d'un systeme d'automatisation
WO2020064712A1 (fr) Procédé pour l'amélioration de la priorisation de messages, composant logiciel, système de commande et d'observation et système d'automatisation
EP4120556A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance permettant de surveiller l'état d'une machine
DE102023207829A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Erkennen von Anomalien in einem Satz von Signalen
DE102023208156A1 (de) Automatisierte Defekt-Früherkennung bei elektrischen Einrichtungen
EP0843844B1 (fr) Procede pour l'analyse de signaux de processus dans une installation industrielle, notamment dans une centrale electrique
EP4261629A1 (fr) Système de commande pour une installation technique et procédé de fonctionnement
EP3518061A1 (fr) Outil de diagnostic et procédé de diagnostic destiné à la détermination d'un défaut d'une installation
EP3963291B1 (fr) Ensemble capteur conçu pour surveiller un système technique et procédé pour faire fonctionner un ensemble capteur
EP4127848B1 (fr) Procédé et système de diagnostic de messages
DE69706539T2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur produktionsoptimierung
EP0843845B1 (fr) Systeme d'analyse pour installation industrielle, notamment pour centrale electrique
EP1062550A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de traitement de donnees d'une installation technique, ces donnees etant specifiques utilisateur et enregistrees dans differentes memoires donnees
EP3036592B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'amélioration du fonctionnement d'une installation technique
EP4685594A1 (fr) Gestion d'alarme holistique pour un système de commande d'une installation technique
EP4700515A1 (fr) Recherche d'équivalence dans des diagrammes de séquence d'un système de guidage d'une installation technique
EP0795805A1 (fr) Procédé pour analyser des indicateurs dans une centrale électrique
DE102020212313A1 (de) Verfahren zur Diagnose eines Betriebszustands von Feldgeräten eines industriellen Systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990219

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI NL SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20001212

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20010711

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20010711

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 203112

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20010715

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59704028

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20010816

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010831

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20010913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20011011

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2160365

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

EN Fr: translation not filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS A.G.

Effective date: 20010831

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH

Effective date: 20020308

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20030913

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition

Effective date: 20030913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCAR

Free format text: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG;INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FREILAGERSTRASSE 40;8047 ZUERICH (CH)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20120813

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20120809

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120912

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20121113

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120806

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120711

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20140301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 203112

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130828

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140301

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130828

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130828

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130829

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20140815

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20141020

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 59704028

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20150828

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160301

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150828