EP1298409B1 - Un système de lancement d'une tête de combat avec un dispositif de guidage après tir pour la neutralisation des mines - Google Patents
Un système de lancement d'une tête de combat avec un dispositif de guidage après tir pour la neutralisation des mines Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1298409B1 EP1298409B1 EP02017902A EP02017902A EP1298409B1 EP 1298409 B1 EP1298409 B1 EP 1298409B1 EP 02017902 A EP02017902 A EP 02017902A EP 02017902 A EP02017902 A EP 02017902A EP 1298409 B1 EP1298409 B1 EP 1298409B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- warhead
- laser
- mine
- mines
- motors
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/12—Means for clearing land minefields; Systems specially adapted for detection of landmines
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41B—WEAPONS FOR PROJECTING MISSILES WITHOUT USE OF EXPLOSIVE OR COMBUSTIBLE PROPELLANT CHARGE; WEAPONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F41B7/00—Spring guns
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/12—Aiming or laying means with means for compensating for muzzle velocity or powder temperature with means for compensating for gun vibrations
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
- F41G7/30—Command link guidance systems
- F41G7/301—Details
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
- F42B10/60—Steering arrangements
- F42B10/66—Steering by varying intensity or direction of thrust
- F42B10/661—Steering by varying intensity or direction of thrust using several transversally acting rocket motors, each motor containing an individual propellant charge, e.g. solid charge
Definitions
- the invention relates to a system for a shipment of a warhead in a target area according to the features indicated in the preamble of claim 1.
- Methods of making the mine so manageable that it can be picked up and blown up in a safe place are to apply it a quick-setting foam to secure the igniter or by cooling with liquid helium to block the trigger mechanism.
- a neutralization of a mine from a safe distance with shelling can lead to damage to the mine, which then no longer permits the approach of a deminerator.
- the shelling of buried mines is basically out of the question. Even if the mine position is optically marked, the bombardment angle of a vehicle is so unfavorable that in many cases the penetration length in the earth region is too great.
- the system is designed to allow soldiers with armored vehicles to evacuate recognized mines that are overt or covertly laid;
- the system must allow the safe neutralization of mines from a distance of 10 - 50 m from the vehicle;
- the neutralization must be done with high reliability (greater than 95%). It is desirable that the mine does not trigger by the neutralization process;
- mines All types of mines (smart mines, dump mines, AT mines, AP mines, off-route mines adw, open or buried under the earth's surface) must be neutralized;
- the system must be designed as a retrofit kit for vehicles and must not affect the vehicle's signature.
- the vehicle must be in its original state after dismantling the set-up kit;
- the system must have a high degree of automation in order to relieve the crew of the operation to a great extent;
- the system must be able to operate on mines or markers visually recognized by the crew, as well as on positions known only by their coordinates;
- the system should be able to precisely combat enemy positions in the near range so that secondary effects are largely avoided;
- the system should be usable under all weather and climatic conditions.
- the basic idea of the method according to the invention is to ignite a fragmentation warhead precisely above the visible mine or, if the mine is not visible below the surface of the earth, above its position, which is either optically marked and / or known as a coordinate.
- the triggering of the fragmentation warhead causes each mine to be destroyed up to 30 cm below the earth's surface by the action of splinters.
- the splinter charge contains a splitter density of approx. 0.2 splitter / cm 2 .
- the fragmentation warhead reaches this fragment density in a circular area of about one meter in diameter.
- the mine to be destroyed must therefore be within this circle.
- the mechanism of neutralization is based on mechanically destroying mines by the action of splinters so that they are no longer dangerous.
- the advantage of this method is that regardless of the size, the design, the ignition mechanism and the laying method (on or below the earth's surface) of the mine is given a high neutralization probability (even against smart mines).
- the combination of a high-precision mechanical throwing system and a trajectory correction device ensures that the fragmentation warhead precisely above the mine position to effect and thus a high splinter density can be achieved.
- the trajectory correction by microreaction engines is based on a proven technique that allows extremely simple implementations. With only three microreaction engines on the perimeter of the projectile, a trajectory correction can be achieved once, which brings about the decisive improvement in accuracy.
- the timing for neutralization is minimal. After detecting the mine position, the neutralization takes place after approx. 10 seconds.
- the throwing system is perfectly suited for a device-technical realization as a set-up kit.
- the modules to be adapted only insignificantly change the signature of the vehicle.
- the throwing system according to the invention makes it possible to realize a set-up kit consisting of the partial areas of throwing system 20 with straightening device 21, laser illuminator 7 and fragmentation warhead 3.
- Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the throwing system 20 with straightening device 21 for precise shipment of the fragmentation warhead 3.
- the straightening device 21 allows alignment of the throwing system 20 in azimuth 22 in a range of about 0 to 180 degrees and elevation 23 in a range of approx 60 to 80 degrees.
- a transport position with 0 degrees is provided.
- the throwing system 20 can preferably be designed as a spring-throw system, which enables significantly lower scattering of the nominal trajectory compared to pyrotechnic transfer mechanisms.
- the principle is to stretch springs 1 by means of electric motors 2 so far that upon release of the springs 1, the fragmentation warhead 3 a precisely Preselected initial speed.
- the force / path profile of the springs 1, which corresponds to this energy can be measured to control the clamping operation by electric motors 2 precisely via force elements or current sensors 4 in the power supply of the electric motors 2. This also influences by temperature and fatigue in the springs 2 can be largely compensated. Since a gas-tight leadership of the fragmentation warhead 3 deleted, the fragmentation warhead 3 z. B. in a cup 5, which is accelerated by the springs 1 via a play-free roller guide 6, are ejected with low Abgang scattering.
- the laser illuminator 7 shown in FIG. 3 can emit two laser beams 8, 9 independently of one another in freely positionable azimuth and elevation, wherein the laser illuminator 7 is positioned on a vehicle 19.
- the first laser beam 8 is used to illuminate a mine 10 or a surface position under which the mine 10 is located.
- the laser beam 8 can be guided by the vehicle crew by manually directing a target mark on the detected mine 10 or be automatically directed via a control unit, not shown. For this automatic control then the exact position of the mine and the exact position and direction of the vehicle 19 are required.
- the second laser beam 9 has the shape of a fan. Elevation and azimuth angles are automatically determined with respect to the spatial position of the illumination laser beam 8.
- the azimuth angle of the center line of the fan corresponds to the azimuth angle of the illumination laser 8
- the elevation angle is greater than the elevation angle of the illumination laser 8 by such a value, so that the beam fan 9 at a preselectable distance 28, which is for example 2 - 4 m, above the illumination position 29 of the mine 10 runs.
- This laser beam 9 is coded.
- the fragmentation warhead 3 consists of the following components: A warhead body 11, a fragmentation charge 12, a arranged on the front side of the fragmentation warhead 3 laser position detector 13, which determines the position of the laser light spot 29 of the illumination laser 8, a laser detector 14 with decoder for Detection of the coded laser fan 9, three micro reaction engines 15 with ignition device, which are mounted offset at the periphery of the warhead by 120 degrees, and a control and evaluation unit 16, which causes the control of the laser position detector 13, the laser detector 14, the micro reaction engines 15, as well as the ignition of the warhead.
- the throwing system works as follows:
- the electronics and ignition device of the warhead 3 is activated by the throwing process. Approximately 3 m above the ground 24, the warhead 3 dives through the laser fan 9. This event is detected by the laser detector 14 with decoder. Thereby, the laser position detector 13 is turned on at the front side of the warhead 3, which measures the direction of the impact point 25 to the illumination point 29 of the mine 10. The direction is only determined as a sector. The number of sectors is determined by the number of microreaction engines 15. With three microreaction engines 15 equally distributed around the circumference 17, a total of six displacements 18 offset by 60 degrees each can be achieved by firing one or two engines 15. Thus, a resolution of the search range in six 60-degree directional segments is required if one or two microreaction engines 15 are fired depending on the segment.
- the laser position detector 13 determines whether the trajectory 27 opens into the spot 29 of the illumination laser 8 or the trajectory 27 has a tray 26. Given a tray 26, the angle is measured and the associated one or two engines 15 ignited. This causes a correction of the trajectory 27 in the direction of the illumination spot 10. Since the height of the laser fan 9 above the earth's surface, as well as the velocity of the warhead is known, after a certain time in which the correction of the trajectory is completed, the triggering of the fragmentation warhead 3 can be made about 1 m above the ground. The splinters, not shown, are thus ejected downward in an approximate uniform distribution at a speed of about 800 m / s.
- the triggering level, the discharge characteristic and the number of splinters are selected so that a splitter density of 0.2 splitter / cm 2 is achieved in a circle of about one meter in diameter.
- the kinetic energy of the splinters is sufficient to safely destroy the mines after penetrating 30 cm of soil.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
- Near-Field Transmission Systems (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
Claims (15)
- Procédé pour déclencher ou neutraliser des mines qui se trouvent sur ou sous la surface du sol, caractérisé en ce qu'un corps actif (3) est amené au-dessus de la mine (10) dans un point prédéfini, des informations de commande étant générées qui permettent de corriger la trajectoire (27) du corps actif (3) avant d'atteindre le point prédéfini et le corps actif (3) étant amorcé au-dessus de la position de la mine (10).
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les informations de commande sont déterminées au moyen de rayons laser (8, 9).
- Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce qu'un premier rayon laser (8) émis par un projecteur à laser (7) sert à éclairer la mine (10) ou la position de la surface sous laquelle se trouve la mine (10), le rayon laser (8) pouvant être dirigé manuellement ou automatiquement sur la mine détectée.
- Procédé selon la revendication 2 et 3, caractérisé en ce qu'un deuxième rayon laser (9) codé émis par le projecteur à laser (7) présente la forme d'un éventail, l'angle d'azimut de la ligne médiane de l'éventail correspondant à l'angle d'azimut du laser d'éclairage et l'angle d'élévation étant supérieur à l'angle d'élévation du laser d'éclairage de telle sorte que l'éventail de rayons s'étende à une distance (28) pratiquement constante et pouvant être présélectionnée au-dessus de la position d'éclairage (29) de la mine (10).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que la correction de la trajectoire est réalisée au moyen de propulseurs à microréaction (15) dans le corps actif (3).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que la mine (10) est marquée de manière optique et/ou connue sous la forme de coordonnées.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le corps actif (3) peut être amené sur une distance de 10 à 100 m.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce que le corps actif reçoit une vitesse initiale pouvant être présélectionnée avec précision.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8, caractérisé en ce que le corps actif (3) vient heurter le point prédéfini sous un angle > 70 degrés.
- Corps actif pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9, caractérisé en ce que le corps actif (3) présente une ogive à fragmentation (3) avec une charge à fragmentation (12) et des moyens (13, 14, 15, 16) pour générer les informations de commande ainsi que pour corriger la trajectoire (27) et un dispositif électronique et d'amorçage.
- Corps actif selon la revendication 10, caractérisé en ce que les moyens sont un détecteur de position de laser (13) monté sur le côté frontal, un détecteur de laser (14) avec dispositif de décodage monté du côté arrière, des propulseurs à microréaction (15) avec dispositifs d'amorçage montés sur le pourtour ainsi qu'une unité de commande et d'entraînement (16).
- Corps actif selon la revendication 10 ou 11, caractérisé en ce que la charge à fragmentation possède une densité de fragments d'environ 0,2 fragments / cm2.
- Corps actif selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce qu'avec trois propulseurs à microréaction (15) distribués régulièrement sur le pourtour (17), il est possible, en allumant un ou deux propulseurs, d'obtenir au total six déviations (18) respectivement décalées de 60°.
- Corps actif selon la revendication 13, caractérisé en ce que trois propulseurs à microréaction (15) sont montés sur le pourtour du corps actif (3) en étant à chaque fois décalés de 120° l'un par rapport à l'autre.
- Dispositif pour amener un corps actif selon l'une des revendications 10 à 14 au-dessus d'une mine (10), présentant un système d'éjection (20) muni d'un dispositif d'orientation (21) ainsi qu'un projecteur à laser (7) pour émettre deux rayons laser (8, 9) positionnables à volonté et ayant un azimut et une élévation indépendants pour l'alignement et le déclenchement du corps actif (3) au-dessus de la mine (10).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE10147837 | 2001-09-27 | ||
| DE10147837A DE10147837A1 (de) | 2001-09-27 | 2001-09-27 | Wurfsystem für einen Gefechtskopf mit einer Richtvorrichtung zur Neutralisierung von Minen |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1298409A1 EP1298409A1 (fr) | 2003-04-02 |
| EP1298409B1 true EP1298409B1 (fr) | 2006-03-08 |
Family
ID=7700602
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP02017902A Expired - Lifetime EP1298409B1 (fr) | 2001-09-27 | 2002-08-09 | Un système de lancement d'une tête de combat avec un dispositif de guidage après tir pour la neutralisation des mines |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6662701B2 (fr) |
| EP (1) | EP1298409B1 (fr) |
| AT (1) | ATE319977T1 (fr) |
| DE (2) | DE10147837A1 (fr) |
| DK (1) | DK1298409T3 (fr) |
| ES (1) | ES2258124T3 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1504233A1 (fr) * | 2002-04-12 | 2005-02-09 | Euronord S.A.S. di G.B. Marcolla & C. | Systeme de deminage |
| DE102004046571A1 (de) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-04-06 | Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh | Vorrichtung zum Verbringen einer Nutzlast, insbesondere zur Neutralisierung von Minen oder dergleichen |
| US8061343B2 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2011-11-22 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Controllable launcher |
| FR3050814B1 (fr) * | 2016-04-29 | 2019-06-07 | Airbus Helicopters | Procede et dispositif d'aide a la visee pour le guidage laser d'un projectile |
| DE102016113521A1 (de) | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-25 | Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh | Geschoss |
| US10151555B1 (en) * | 2017-06-08 | 2018-12-11 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Air cannon with sabot system |
| US10746495B1 (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2020-08-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Catapult launcher |
| CN114877761B (zh) * | 2021-09-26 | 2023-11-07 | 中国人民解放军63921部队 | 一种基于自然岩石环境的深侵惰性弹靶场飞行试验方法 |
Family Cites Families (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3116039A (en) * | 1956-02-29 | 1963-12-31 | Goldberg Michael | Method of and system for guiding a missile |
| US3998406A (en) * | 1964-05-28 | 1976-12-21 | Aeronutronic Ford Corporation | Guided missile system |
| US3743216A (en) * | 1969-01-09 | 1973-07-03 | Us Army | Homing missile system using laser illuminator |
| US3860199A (en) * | 1972-01-03 | 1975-01-14 | Ship Systems Inc | Laser-guided projectile system |
| US4143835A (en) * | 1972-09-12 | 1979-03-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Missile system using laser illuminator |
| US5350134A (en) * | 1973-07-03 | 1994-09-27 | Gec Ferranti Defence Systems Limited | Target identification systems |
| US3924600A (en) * | 1973-07-20 | 1975-12-09 | Geroge C Luebkeman | Throwing arm latch for spring target traps |
| FR2279062A1 (fr) * | 1974-01-02 | 1976-02-13 | Laporte Jean Michel | Appareil de lancement de plateaux pour le tir |
| US3974383A (en) * | 1975-02-03 | 1976-08-10 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Missile tracking and guidance system |
| SE429064B (sv) * | 1976-04-02 | 1983-08-08 | Bofors Ab | Slutfaskorrigering av roterande projektil |
| DE2803036A1 (de) * | 1978-01-25 | 1979-07-26 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Gelenkte bombe fuer den tiefflugeinsatz |
| US4300736A (en) * | 1979-08-17 | 1981-11-17 | Raytheon Company | Fire control system |
| DE2947492C2 (de) * | 1979-11-24 | 1983-04-28 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt | Lenkverfahren für Flugkörper |
| DE2951941C2 (de) * | 1979-12-22 | 1988-01-21 | Diehl GmbH & Co, 8500 Nürnberg | Optische Fernlenkvorrichtung für ein Geschoß |
| CA1180085A (fr) * | 1980-11-21 | 1984-12-27 | Michel M. Fortier | Dispositif d'exercice de bombardement guide par laser |
| US4431147A (en) * | 1981-12-24 | 1984-02-14 | The Bendix Corporation | Steerable artillery projectile |
| US4678143A (en) * | 1982-12-17 | 1987-07-07 | Frazer-Nash Ltd. | Launcher for remotely piloted aircraft |
| US4624424A (en) * | 1984-11-07 | 1986-11-25 | The Boeing Company | On-board flight control drag actuator system |
| DE3441921A1 (de) * | 1984-11-16 | 1986-05-28 | Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8012 Ottobrunn | Leitstrahl- und nachfuehreinrichtung |
| FR2627268B1 (fr) * | 1988-02-12 | 1993-05-14 | Thomson Brandt Armements | Systeme de guidage de vecteur par faisceau laser et impulseurs pyrotechniques, et vecteur guide par un tel systeme |
| US5102065A (en) * | 1988-02-17 | 1992-04-07 | Thomson - Csf | System to correct the trajectory of a projectile |
| US5011097A (en) * | 1990-08-30 | 1991-04-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Vehicle steering device |
| DE4035325A1 (de) * | 1990-11-07 | 1992-05-14 | Wegmann & Co | Vorrichtung zur reichweitensteuerung von wurfkoerpern und geschossen, insbesondere in einem wurfsystem fuer nebelkerzen, sprengkoerper u. dgl. |
| FR2669108B1 (fr) * | 1990-11-09 | 1997-01-03 | Thomson Csf | Dispositif optique de mesure de l'angle de roulis d'un projectile. |
| DE4128313C2 (de) * | 1991-08-27 | 2000-04-20 | Diehl Stiftung & Co | Lenk-Flugkörper zur Gefechtskopf-Abwehr |
| DE4325218C2 (de) * | 1993-07-28 | 1998-10-22 | Diehl Stiftung & Co | Artillerie-Rakete und Verfahren zur Leistungssteigerung einer Artillerie-Rakete |
| DE4416211C2 (de) * | 1994-05-07 | 1996-09-26 | Rheinmetall Ind Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Flugbahnkorrektur von Geschossen |
| DE4425285C2 (de) * | 1994-07-16 | 1997-04-17 | Rheinmetall Ind Ag | Vorrichtung zur Flugbahnkorrektur von drallstabilisierten Geschossen |
| US5458041A (en) * | 1994-08-02 | 1995-10-17 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Air defense destruction missile weapon system |
| US6062207A (en) * | 1996-05-29 | 2000-05-16 | Underhill; Clinton James | Target trap foot operated cocking and releasing device |
| US5695152A (en) * | 1996-09-18 | 1997-12-09 | Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd. | System for correcting flight trajectory of a projectile |
| US5831724A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1998-11-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Imaging lidar-based aim verification method and system |
| US5988038A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 1999-11-23 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for destroying buried objects |
| US6422507B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2002-07-23 | Jay Lipeles | Smart bullet |
| DE60023007T2 (de) * | 1999-07-21 | 2006-07-13 | General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc., St. Petersburg | Geschosslenkung mittels einer ringanordnung und optisch ausgelösten ablenkvorrichtungen |
-
2001
- 2001-09-27 DE DE10147837A patent/DE10147837A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-08-09 DK DK02017902T patent/DK1298409T3/da active
- 2002-08-09 ES ES02017902T patent/ES2258124T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-08-09 AT AT02017902T patent/ATE319977T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-08-09 EP EP02017902A patent/EP1298409B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-08-09 DE DE50205991T patent/DE50205991D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-09-25 US US10/253,611 patent/US6662701B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20030126979A1 (en) | 2003-07-10 |
| DE50205991D1 (de) | 2006-05-04 |
| DE10147837A1 (de) | 2003-04-24 |
| EP1298409A1 (fr) | 2003-04-02 |
| DK1298409T3 (da) | 2006-04-18 |
| ES2258124T3 (es) | 2006-08-16 |
| US6662701B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 |
| ATE319977T1 (de) | 2006-03-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE10346001B4 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern | |
| DE2336040A1 (de) | Abwehrsystem, insbesondere fuer die panzerbekaempfung | |
| DE102007007403A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz gegen fliegende Angriffsmunitionskörper | |
| DE2411790A1 (de) | Verfahren und waffensystem zur gezielten bekaempfung von oberflaechenzielen | |
| DE69900454T2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur vernichtung von erdverlegten gegenständen | |
| EP1298409B1 (fr) | Un système de lancement d'une tête de combat avec un dispositif de guidage après tir pour la neutralisation des mines | |
| DE69410376T2 (de) | Waffensystem für die verteidigung eines gebietes | |
| DE69006564T2 (de) | Automatisches waffensystem für die flächenverteidigung. | |
| DE4029898C2 (fr) | ||
| DE2650804C1 (de) | Einrichtung an tieffliegenden Waffentraegern zur Bekaempfung von Bodenzielen | |
| DE3013405C2 (de) | Verfahren zum Vermeiden des Nachrichtens von Abschußgeräten für ballistische Flugkörper | |
| EP0708305B1 (fr) | Procédé pour protéger des objets rayonnants contre des missiles, en particulier des objets émettant un rayonnement dans l'infrarouge comme des navires | |
| EP3943874A1 (fr) | Dispositif de luttes contre une cible | |
| DE3123339A1 (de) | Verfahren zur fernzuendung eines sprenggeschosses, insbesondere eines hubschrauberabwehrgeschosses sowie einrichtung und geschoss zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens | |
| EP0757224A1 (fr) | Munition électromagnétique et non léthale | |
| DE3543769A1 (de) | Mine zur abwehr von bewegten objekten | |
| DE102018129778B4 (de) | Übungsmunition und Trainingssystem unter Verwendung der Übungsmunition | |
| EP1752730B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé de protection de véhicules contre des munitions, en particulier contre des charges creuses | |
| DE3326748C2 (fr) | ||
| DE3337873A1 (de) | Geschoss fuer granatwerfersysteme | |
| DE3603497C1 (de) | Geschoss fuer eine Panzerabwehrwaffe zur Bekaempfung eines Panzers von oben | |
| EP0913661A2 (fr) | Dispositif pour protéger des objets mobiles, en particulier des véhicules blindés, contre des projectiles | |
| DE102019103911A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bekämpfung von Luftzielen mittels Lenkflugkörpern | |
| DE102018131524A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Schutz von beweglichen oder unbeweglichen Objekten vor sich nähernden lasergelenkten Bedrohungen | |
| DE3938798C1 (en) | Low flying or hovering aircraft combating - laying out probes with sensors along typical flight path, and launching light signal on detection of aircraft, marking its position |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20021219 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
| AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME GMBH |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20060308 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50205991 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060504 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060608 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060808 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20060815 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2258124 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060831 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20060914 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20061211 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060809 |
|
| BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20070831 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060609 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060809 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070831 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070831 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20070810 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060308 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070810 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20090813 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20090814 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20090827 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090821 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090819 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20110301 |
|
| EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20100809 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110502 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110301 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100809 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 50205991 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110301 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110301 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100831 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100809 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090914 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100810 |