EP1520152A1 - Flugzeugnavigationshilfeverfahren und -vorrichtung - Google Patents

Flugzeugnavigationshilfeverfahren und -vorrichtung

Info

Publication number
EP1520152A1
EP1520152A1 EP03750784A EP03750784A EP1520152A1 EP 1520152 A1 EP1520152 A1 EP 1520152A1 EP 03750784 A EP03750784 A EP 03750784A EP 03750784 A EP03750784 A EP 03750784A EP 1520152 A1 EP1520152 A1 EP 1520152A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aircraft
turn
trajectory
probe
wind
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP03750784A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
J.-C.; c/o Thales Intellectual Property JAILLANT
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales SA
Original Assignee
Thales SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales SA filed Critical Thales SA
Publication of EP1520152A1 publication Critical patent/EP1520152A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C23/00Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/02Control of position or course in two dimensions
    • G05D1/0202Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to aircraft

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an on-board method and device for assisting the navigation of an aircraft.
  • the field of the invention is that of aid to navigation and air safety and more particularly relates to aid for the alignment of an aircraft on a predetermined trajectory such as for example an approach trajectory.
  • the trajectory to be captured is also designated by the trajectory on which the aircraft must align; it is a priori a trajectory that does not change or little during the capture. Subsequently, we consider more particularly ground trajectories, that is to say projections on the ground of the trajectories of aircraft.
  • the trajectory 1 to be captured in order to land on a runway 5 is displayed on the navigation screen 4 of the airplane which is itself schematically represented on the screen under the reference 3. It is a 1-track trajectory comprising 2 altitude or control point marks, sent by an air traffic controller at the airport. As the airplane 3 progresses, this trajectory 1 ground scrolls under the airplane located in the center of the navigation screen 4 and whose heading is marked in degrees (275 ° in the case of the figure ). To avoid overloading the figure, the measurements provided by the aircraft sensors and which are displayed on this navigation screen are not shown.
  • this trajectory does not travel exactly under the airplane, in particular when the very position of the airplane is not displayed on the navigation screen with sufficient precision. This may be the case when the means of calculating and / or displaying the trajectory of the airplane which are on board the aircraft are insufficiently precise.
  • this trajectory does not pass under the plane because the plane is not aligned on it in particular because of the wind which deports the plane and prevents it for example from respecting the planned turn.
  • the airplane 3 controlled by the pilot can then capture this trajectory 1 further on at the end of a trajectory 10 as illustrated in FIG. 2a); in this case, the pilot has less time to implement the different landing procedures, which therefore become more risky.
  • the pilot can decide to describe a loop 1 1 as illustrated in FIG. 2b); this allows him to capture the trajectory 1 at a point which will not penalize him for implementing the different landing procedures.
  • this solution then delays the landing of the aircraft, which presents risks for the next aircraft when the landing windows between two aircraft are close together.
  • An arc of a circle predicting the trend of the air path of the airplane as soon as it is turning, can also be calculated by the on-board calculation means and displayed on the navigation screen.
  • An air path is an ideal path that does not take into account the effect of the wind. However, this is only a trend and such an arc of a circle does not predict the future air trajectory or the future ground trajectory of the aircraft before the turn, in particular in the event of wind.
  • An important object of the invention is therefore to allow the best capture of a predetermined trajectory, taking into account the effect of the wind on the trajectory of the aircraft.
  • the probe indicates the ground trajectory that the aircraft would follow if it immediately started a turn at the maximum rate applicable to the flight phase in which the aircraft is located.
  • the invention proposes a method for assisting the navigation of an aircraft, characterized in that it comprises the following steps consisting in: a) calculating a probe as a function of the wind, b) display on a navigation screen the probe and a ground trajectory to be captured, in order to determine a turning of the aircraft making it possible to best capture the trajectory to be captured.
  • it further comprises a step consisting in giving the order to turn when the probe tangents the ground trajectory to be captured.
  • the method according to the invention is based on the simultaneous display (step b) of a trajectory to be captured which a priori does not change or little during capture and of a calculated probe (step a) according to the wind at successive instants: as soon as it appears that the probe is tangent to the trajectory to be captured, an order to turn the aircraft is given (step c), this turn making it possible, taking into account the wind, to capture the trajectory as well as possible, otherwise steps a), b) and c) are repeated.
  • the turn is determined to allow better capture of the trajectory than if the aircraft had been turned while faithfully respecting the trajectory to be captured; blown away by the wind, the aircraft would then have captured the trajectory further (or possibly closer).
  • This early (or even delayed) turn also makes it possible to accurately predict the capture point, that is to say the position relative to the ground of the capture point and possibly the instant of capture, regardless of the initial position and orientation of the aircraft and whatever the flight mode.
  • the invention also relates to on-board equipment for assisting the navigation of an aircraft comprising at least one program memory and a user interface, characterized in that the program memory comprises a program for calculating a probe, and a program for displaying on the user interface a trajectory to be captured and the probe.
  • FIG. 1 already described schematically represents a navigation screen on which is displayed a trajectory to be captured
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart representing the main steps of the method according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 schematically illustrates the comparison of a probe and of a trajectory to be captured for two positions A or B of the airplane
  • FIG. 1 already described schematically represents a navigation screen on which is displayed a trajectory to be captured
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart representing the main steps of the method according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 schematically illustrates the comparison of a probe and of a trajectory to be captured for two positions A or B of the airplane
  • FIG. 1 already described schematically represents a navigation screen on which is displayed a
  • FIG. 5 represents schematically examples of probe shapes in the case of an instantaneous turn without drift of the aircraft, depending on whether the wind is a tail wind (a), a SE-NO wind (b) or a cross wind (c),
  • FIG. 6 schematically represents an example of shape of right (D) and left (G) feeler including the turning distance and the aircraft drift for a SW-NE wind
  • FIG. 7 schematically an on-board navigation aid device according to the invention.
  • the method according to the invention is based on the simultaneous display (step b) of a trajectory to be captured which a priori does not change or changes little during the capture and of a calculated probe (step a) as a function of the wind at successive instants: as soon as it appears that the probe is tangent to the trajectory to be captured, an order to turn the aircraft (step c) is given, this turn allowing account given the wind to best capture the trajectory. Otherwise, steps a), b) and c) are repeated.
  • FIG. 4 The comparison between the probe and the trajectory to be captured is illustrated in FIG. 4 on which the airplane 3 is represented at two places A and B of its trajectory.
  • the probe 6A corresponding to position A of the airplane 3 does not yet tangent the trajectory 1 to be captured and steps a), b) and c) are repeated at the next instant.
  • the probe 6B corresponding to the position B of the airplane 3 tangents the trajectory 1 to be captured; in this case the airplane 3 is turned at point B for a turn at the maximum rate, that is to say at the rate corresponding to that of the probe.
  • This rate of turn is typically that which corresponds to a roll tilt of 25 °; it decreases at high altitude.
  • This anticipation in B of the turn makes it possible to capture the trajectory 1 at point B 'and therefore earlier than if the airplane had been turned at point C, faithfully respecting trajectory 1; offset by the wind, the airplane 3 would then have captured the trajectory 1 only at point C after having followed the trajectory 10.
  • This anticipation also makes it possible to precisely predict the point B 'of capture, that is to say say the position relative to the ground of the capture point and the instant of capture and this whatever the angle of interception, that is to say whatever the initial position and orientation of the airplane and whatever the piloting mode (with or without radar guidance, ).
  • the steps a), b) and c) of calculation, display and conditional turn can be carried out automatically, that is to say by the calculation means on board the aircraft.
  • the pilot visually compares by means of the navigation screen, the trajectory to be captured and the probe. As soon as it appears that the probe is tangent to the trajectory to be captured, the pilot gives the order to turn the airplane. Steps a), b) and c) can be carried out during the entire flight.
  • FMS flight management system
  • pilot flight management system
  • a probe is obtained.
  • right and a left probe or on the side of the desired turn and a right or left probe is obtained.
  • each step of calculation, and / or display and / or conditional turn can be controlled by the pilot or automatically by the flight management system.
  • the command in step a) and possibly in steps b) and c) can be selected by the pilot by means of, for example, a menu presented via a user interface such as the “MCDU” interface, acronym for "Muiti Control Display Unit", this interface being connected to the flight management system and the navigation receivers.
  • This menu can allow the pilot to select the side of the desired turn for the probe, the probe only being displayed on this side.
  • Steps a), b) and optionally step c) can also be controlled by the pilot or automatically on the occasion of a change of flight mode when, for example, switching from "HSV” mode, acronym of "Heading Vertical Speed” in which we undergo the wind, in FPA mode, acronym for "Flight Path Angle” in which we are freed from the wind.
  • Steps a), b) and optionally step c) can also be controlled by the pilot by other means such as the rotation for example of a degree by the pilot of a selection button, on the side of the turn desired, the probe only being displayed on this side.
  • Steps a), b) and c) can be interrupted as indicated above, on command of the flight management system or of the pilot, for example by turning the selection knob in the opposite direction.
  • the probe is calculated according to the wind. We will first consider that the distance traveled by the aircraft to reach the inclination of the turn (25 ° for example) is zero; this distance is also designated by turning distance.
  • the shape of the probe results from the rotation of the airplane around its center of turn composed with a translation of this center by effect of the wind.
  • the turning distance is zero, it is obtained by a parametric equation which is expressed as follows in a reference frame (O, x, y) centered on the center of gravity of the aircraft, the Oy axis coinciding with the axis of the aircraft:
  • R a ⁇ r being the radius of the turn that the airplane would have without wind
  • the angular speed (or rate of turn) of the airplane in the air during the turn that would have the airplane without wind
  • V x and V y the components of the wind speed vector
  • the sign in front of R a ⁇ r is the + sign when it is a probe to the right of the plane (right probe) and the sign - when it is a probe to the left of the plane (left probe).
  • the shape of the probe and therefore the capture of the trajectory to be captured are optimal when the wind is constant and when the acceleration of the aircraft does not change between the start and the end of the turn.
  • the parametric equation (1) does not take into account the turning distance, that is to say the trajectory segment corresponding to the turning time also designated by rolling time and which is related to the plane's inertia time; a good approximation consists in considering that this segment is straight and in the axis of the trajectory of the airplane. This amounts to adding for the calculation of y a term D v of turning distance.
  • D v is expressed as follows:
  • TAS being the linear ground speed of the airplane, in knots
  • ⁇ rou the difference expressed in degrees between the roll angle at the end of the roll time, i.e. the roll angle that will have the plane at the start of the turn (25 ° for example), and the roll angle at the start of the roll (0 ° when the plane is not already in a turn)
  • Equation (1) the roll rate in degrees per second, which depends on the airplane, and In a inertia factor in seconds, which depends on the airplane. Equation (1) becomes:
  • the airplane when the airplane is subjected to the effect of the wind, it undergoes a drift; it follows that the axis of the trajectory generally no longer coincides with the axis of the aircraft as illustrated in FIG. 6.
  • the drift angle d is the angle between these two axes.
  • the shape of the right and left probes presented in Figure 6 by curves D) and G) was obtained from the following data.
  • the aircraft flies at heading 275 ° (as shown in Figure 1), coinciding with the Oy axis with an air speed of 228 knots; its air turning radius is therefore equal to 1.62 Nm and its angular speed equal to 228 / 1.62 radians / hour.
  • the Ox axis coincides with the 5 ° orientation.
  • the navigation receivers indicate a wind of 35 knots from heading 170 ° (15 ° with respect to Ox), a ground course followed at 283 ° and a ground speed of 242 knots.
  • the components V x and V y of the wind are respectively 34 and 9 knots.
  • the turning distance D v at an inclination of 25 ° is calculated from the following data:
  • Dv is the same for the right or left probes.
  • the original roll angle is greater than about 2 °, the turning distance is shorter to the right than to the left; conversely, when the original roll angle is less than about -2 °, the turning distance is shorter on the left than on the right.
  • trajectory we took as an example of a trajectory to capture a trajectory presenting a curve; the invention also applies to rectilinear trajectories or to other forms of trajectory.
  • trajectories we can cite as examples of trajectories to be captured, an approach trajectory, an obstacle avoidance trajectory displayed on the navigation screen (relief, cloud masses provided by the weather radar, ...) or possibly traffic .
  • the described method is implemented in on-board navigation aid equipment of an aircraft.
  • this equipment 100 is shown in FIG. 7. It conventionally comprises one or more microprocessors 101 coupled to a program memory 102 of ROM type for example, to a working memory 103 of RAM type for example and to one or more memories 104 of ROM type for example for the storage of the trajectory to be captured and of the probe, as well as circuits 105 for transferring data between these various elements.
  • the program memory 102 contains the executable program of the method, in the form of source code, while the working memory 103 includes registers which can be updated for storage of calculation results.
  • This equipment 100 also includes a communication interface 106 to allow the exchange of data with devices such as for example with the user interface "MCDU", with sensors, etc. These elements are for example included in the flight management system, "FMS". They can also be included in the form of dedicated integrated circuits, designed to implement the method.
  • the “MCDU” user interface comprises at least one navigation screen, means for displaying on this screen the trajectory to be captured and the probe and optionally means for controlling the calculation of the probe and / or the display of the probe. and / or turning the aircraft when the probe tangents the trajectory to be captured, via a keyboard for example.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
EP03750784A 2002-07-05 2003-06-27 Flugzeugnavigationshilfeverfahren und -vorrichtung Withdrawn EP1520152A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0208470A FR2841977B1 (fr) 2002-07-05 2002-07-05 Procede d'aide a la navigation d'un areonef et dispositif correspondant
FR0208470 2002-07-05
PCT/FR2003/002001 WO2004005853A1 (fr) 2002-07-05 2003-06-27 Procede d'aide a la navigation d'un aeronef et dispositif correspondant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1520152A1 true EP1520152A1 (de) 2005-04-06

Family

ID=29725208

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03750784A Withdrawn EP1520152A1 (de) 2002-07-05 2003-06-27 Flugzeugnavigationshilfeverfahren und -vorrichtung

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US7584027B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1520152A1 (de)
FR (1) FR2841977B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2004005853A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6227960B1 (en) * 1996-09-20 2001-05-08 Foodcraft Equipment Co., Inc. Eviscerating tool

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7418320B1 (en) * 2005-01-24 2008-08-26 International Business Machines Corporation Navigating a UAV having an on-board digital camera to capture desired geographic area
US7991516B2 (en) * 2006-09-03 2011-08-02 Matos Jeffrey A Apparatus for airfield management
FR2920232B1 (fr) 2007-08-22 2015-02-27 Airbus France Procede et dispositif d'aide au pilotage d'un avion
FR2924240B1 (fr) * 2007-11-23 2016-01-15 Thales Sa Dispositif et procede de pilote automatique avec accrochage instinctif de cible
FR2924833B1 (fr) 2007-12-07 2014-02-07 Thales Sa Selection manuelle de la reference active d'un plan de vol pour le guidage d'un aeronef
FR2928726B1 (fr) * 2008-03-11 2013-05-17 Thales Sa Jonction d'une trajectoire civile et d'une trajectoire militaire
US8886369B2 (en) * 2010-02-11 2014-11-11 The Boeing Company Vertical situation awareness system for aircraft
US9291476B2 (en) * 2012-10-04 2016-03-22 The Boeing Corporation Flight deck display of predefined MPA approach paths with differentiated assigned approach path
US9599994B1 (en) * 2015-08-03 2017-03-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Collisionless flying of unmanned aerial vehicles that maximizes coverage of predetermined region
WO2017221122A1 (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-12-28 Bombardier Inc. Control laws for pedal-to-roll coupling
US10242578B2 (en) 2016-08-01 2019-03-26 Ge Aviation Systems Llc Flight path management system
CN113848972B (zh) * 2021-09-16 2024-03-19 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 一种大型飞机水平导航自动控制方法
FR3135158B1 (fr) 2022-04-28 2024-09-27 Airbus Helicopters Estimateur de trajectoire pour drone

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3786505A (en) * 1970-03-04 1974-01-15 J Rennie Self-contained navigation system
US4215621A (en) * 1978-12-07 1980-08-05 Litton Systems, Inc. Target marker placement for dive-toss deliveries with wings nonlevel
US4283705A (en) * 1979-05-30 1981-08-11 Robert James System for providing an integrated display of instantaneous information relative to aircraft attitude, heading, altitude, and horizontal situation
FR2487505A1 (fr) * 1980-07-23 1982-01-29 Dassault Avions Dispositif d'assistance au pilotage d'un vehicule aerien
DE69301308T2 (de) * 1992-02-18 1996-05-23 Evans & Sutherland Computer Co Bildtexturierungssystem mit themazellen.
FR2752051B1 (fr) * 1996-08-02 1998-10-30 Sextant Avionique Dispositif d'assistance au guidage d'un vehicule sur une trajectoire
DE19700574C1 (de) * 1997-01-10 1998-06-25 Axel Strupatis Unterputzinstallationsvorrichtung
US6112141A (en) * 1997-10-15 2000-08-29 Dassault Aviation Apparatus and method for graphically oriented aircraft display and control
US6092007A (en) * 1998-04-29 2000-07-18 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Aircraft course correction for wind and fuzzy logic course intercept profile based upon accuracy and efficiency
US6317690B1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2001-11-13 Min-Chung Gia Path planning, terrain avoidance and situation awareness system for general aviation
US6995690B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2006-02-07 The Boeing Company Vertical situation display terrain/waypoint swath, range to target speed, and blended airplane reference
FR2803655B1 (fr) * 2000-01-07 2002-06-14 Thomson Csf Sextant Calculateur de vol lissant la trajectoire d'un aeronef sur plusieurs sequences
US6708090B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2004-03-16 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing line-of-sight communications
DE10022820B4 (de) * 2000-05-10 2007-06-28 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Flugführungsanzeige
US6906641B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2005-06-14 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for helicopter enhanced ground proximity warning system
US6262674B1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2001-07-17 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft display with potential thrust indicator
US7216069B2 (en) * 2001-01-19 2007-05-08 Honeywell International, Inc. Simulated visual glideslope indicator on aircraft display
US6798423B2 (en) * 2001-10-11 2004-09-28 The Boeing Company Precision perspective flight guidance symbology system
US6625537B2 (en) * 2002-01-23 2003-09-23 Honeywell Methods and apparatus for assembling a flight plan
US6696980B1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2004-02-24 Garmin International, Inc. Cockpit instrument panel systems and methods of presenting cockpit instrument data
US6732022B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2004-05-04 Technology Patents, Llc Control system for air vehicle and corresponding method
US6708091B2 (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-03-16 Steven Tsao Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004005853A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6227960B1 (en) * 1996-09-20 2001-05-08 Foodcraft Equipment Co., Inc. Eviscerating tool

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2841977A1 (fr) 2004-01-09
US20050234608A1 (en) 2005-10-20
FR2841977B1 (fr) 2004-09-10
US7584027B2 (en) 2009-09-01
WO2004005853A1 (fr) 2004-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2257338C (fr) Procede de pilotage d'un aerodyne pour l'evitement vertical d'une zone
EP2722721B1 (de) Steuerungsassistenzverfahren eines Luftfahrzeugs bei der Landung, und Steuerungsassistenzsystem, das in der Lage ist, dieses Verfahren umzusetzen
EP0902878B1 (de) Kurskorrekturmethode zur steuerung eines fahrzeuges und anwendung dieser methode zur seitlichen vermeidung einer zone
EP3657213B1 (de) Lernverfahren eines neuronennetzes an bord eines luftfahrzeugs für die landehilfe dieses luftfahrzeugs, und server für die umsetzung eines solchen verfahrens
EP1520152A1 (de) Flugzeugnavigationshilfeverfahren und -vorrichtung
EP0902879A1 (de) Automatische korrekturmethode für ein fahrzeug zur seitlichen vermeidung einer festen zone
EP0989386A1 (de) Landehilfevorrichtung, insbesondere zum Abschalten eines Grundkollisionsalarmes
EP0722132B1 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung eines Flugzeuges durch das Folgen auf einer, mittels Passierpunkten bestimmten horizontalen Flugbahn
FR2949013A1 (fr) Dispositif de guidage pour aeronef pour l'aide a la navigation aeroportuaire
EP3388914A1 (de) Zielverfolgungsverfahren durch eine drohne, entsprechende software, entsprechendes elektronisches system und entsprechende drohne
FR2847553A1 (fr) Dispositif d'aide a l'interception par un aeronef d'un segment d'une trajectoire situee dans un plan horizontal et systeme d'aide a l'interception et au suivi d'un tel segment
FR2872316A1 (fr) Procede de changement de procedure d'approche d'un aeronef
EP1057086B1 (de) Verfahren zur horizontalen leitweglenkung eines flugzeuges zwischen zwei verpflichteten punkten
WO2000039775A2 (fr) Systeme d'aide a l'evitement de collisions d'aeronefs avec le terrain
FR2971863A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'aide a la gestion du vol d'un aeronef.
EP3945514B1 (de) Luftfahrzeug mit einer flugsteuerungsarchitektur
EP4066079B1 (de) Flugzeugsteuerungssystem
FR2925710A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de modification d'une trajectoire de vol pour realiser une manoeuvre d'espacement.
FR3079501A1 (fr) Procede et systeme d'aide au pilotage d'un aeronef
WO2021228923A1 (fr) Dispositif électronique, et procédé, de guidage du pilote dans le pilotage d'un aéronef lors de l'atterrissage en présence de vent de travers
FR3031830A1 (fr) Procede et systeme de guidage d'un aeronef
FR3021129A1 (fr) Procede et systeme de controle d'un aeronef
FR3135158A1 (fr) Estimateur de trajectoire pour drone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20041216

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20100105