EP1561663B1 - Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges - Google Patents
Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1561663B1 EP1561663B1 EP04029627A EP04029627A EP1561663B1 EP 1561663 B1 EP1561663 B1 EP 1561663B1 EP 04029627 A EP04029627 A EP 04029627A EP 04029627 A EP04029627 A EP 04029627A EP 1561663 B1 EP1561663 B1 EP 1561663B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- balise
- train
- signal
- control unit
- assigned
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005288 electromagnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L1/00—Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
- B61L1/14—Devices for indicating the passing of the end of the vehicle or train
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method and a device for train completeness control of a rail-bound train.
- the train integrity check is a very important function in train traffic, because it is derived from the interlocking and / or control engineering side view from the acknowledged completeness check of a train that a certain section of the road is free. Comparatively simply the train integrity control in modern train compositions, such as an ICE of the German course AG or an ICN of the Swiss Federal Railways AG or comparable high-speed trains, with which the individual cars are usually connected via a so-called train bus in a data-technical way and the demolition of one or several wagons would be determined by an interruption of the train-bus.
- a method is known in which the train leading vehicle a predefined pressure increase, Holding and lowering pattern emits that is registered and evaluated by a pressure gauge in the detection and communication unit.
- the recognition and communication unit acknowledges the registration of the print pattern by emitting a pressure signal through the main air line, for which purpose a controllable bleed valve connected to the pressure gauge is opened for a short time.
- German Patent Application 198 32 603 a device for train integrity control and / or train length measurement is known in which the traction vehicle of a vehicle association feeds ultrasound signals into at least one rail of the track it is traveling on. Each on-rail vehicle wheel of the train forms an impurity for these ultrasonic signals, resulting in the reflection of a fraction of the injected radiation.
- the traction vehicle evaluates the reflected signals in terms of frequency, amplitude and, if necessary. Time response and detects from this the number and, if necessary, the distance of the Anlagenrad accounts. Via a transmitting / receiving device, the traction vehicle can transmit corresponding messages together with location messages to other trains and / or track facilities.
- a disadvantage of this solution may be that it may be possible due to rail interruptions, Schienenstörstellen, switches and the like, that it may lead to distortions of the reflected signal, which thus can draw inaccurate conclusions about the integrity of the train by itself.
- This method is characterized in that the transmission of the first and the second signal can be achieved with comparatively simple technical means and at the same time connected to the devices for train control / Weglenkung second waypoint or its control unit a corresponding completeness signal in the direction of the train driver itself can settle.
- the train control unit may be, for example, the control unit of the locomotive or the control car. If the train is complete, the driver may only be given a visual and / or audible indication of the actual train completion.
- the train control unit via train radio or GSM-R sends a corresponding message to a signal box or a control center. These in turn can, for example, continue the remaining train until the remainder of the train can be stopped on a siding or a free station siding or a service area.
- the section of track on which the loss of train completion has occurred is marked as "occupied” and the salvage of the lost wagons is initiated immediately or with a time delay, depending on the urgency of the track section availability.
- a track-side train control unit can be, for example, a signal or a signal chain and / or a switch or a soft chain.
- a track-side train control unit can be, for example, a signal or a signal chain and / or a switch or a soft chain.
- the remainder of the train can be stopped immediately at a desired position. With the second, the remainder of the train to a desired track section is controlled and also stop as needed.
- the above-mentioned first signal may be, for example, an emission lobe emitted by the locomotive, with the aid of which transmitted energy, for example, in various train control systems signal terms are read out of waypoints. It may be advantageous to store this energy transmitted with the first signal in the waypoint or in the control unit associated with the waypoint, so that the waypoint and / or the control unit can use this stored energy in the further process and thus operated independently by an additional energy supply can be. For example, it is directly possible to use this stored amount of energy to initiate the transmission of the second signal. In other words, this means that the stored energy can be used to trigger the transmission of the second signal.
- the stored energy can be advantageously used to retrieve an amount of energy from the control point associated with the track point, which in turn is used by the route point to send an interrogation signal.
- the power of the radiated interrogation signal can be set so that the transmitter of the second signal can feed from this interrogation signal for transmitting the second signal.
- the frequency of the first signal, the interrogation signal and the second signal are designed differently from each other.
- the frequency of the first signal may be in the range of 27 MHz.
- the interrogation signal for example, for the purpose of appropriate energy transfer and to avoid crosstalk on adjacent tracks, should be in the near range, it makes sense here, if the frequency of the interrogation signal is in the range of a few MHz.
- the range of the second signal must indeed be only in the range of about 1 m, and the frequency of the second signal can be in the range of a few MHz, with the Radiation of the second signal required power can be extremely small.
- the waypoint is at least partially shielded laterally.
- the first and / or the second signal can be analyzed with regard to their signal level.
- a first or a second lower limit value for the respective signal level may be defined for the first and the second signal, wherein the first and second signal must exceed their respective defined lower limit value in order to be considered detected.
- the device can be configured in an advantageous development of the invention such that the energy transmitted with the transmission of the first transmitting unit can be stored on the waypoint or a control unit associated with the waypoint and this stored energy is preferably usable to initiate the transmission of an interrogation signal.
- the second transmitter unit may advantageously be able to extract the electrical power required to transmit its transmission from the interrogation signal.
- the particular advantage consists, inter alia, in the fact that the second transmitting unit thus does not have to have its own energy supply, but wins this energy from the reception of the interrogation signal.
- the second transmitting unit may comprise a switching unit with which the frequency and / or the amplitude of the transmission transmitted by it can be selected between at least two types of transmission. In this case, a transmission mode can even provide that no signal is transmitted, even if the transmission of this second signal has been initiated accordingly.
- each wagon with a second transmitting unit, wherein by means of the switching unit is achieved that differs from the second arranged at the last car transmitting unit signal differs from the other transmitted signals or that arranged on the last car second Sending unit is the only one which emits a second signal, for example, after receiving the interrogation signal.
- Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of a device for controlling the completeness of a train 2.
- the train 2 includes a locomotive 4 and several cars 6, 8 and 10.
- the locomotive 4 includes a first transmitting / receiving device 12, one of the locomotive 4 leading Abstrahlkeule 14 emits at a frequency of 27 MHz.
- This emission lobe 14 in the present context of the train integrity check represents a first signal, which is referred to below as the wake-up signal WS.
- WS the wake-up signal
- this Abstrahlkeule 14 for example, to retrieve a signal term or a Beautysentelegramms designed as a transmitting / receiving Festbalise transceiver is provided as a so-called waypoint 16 in this embodiment.
- This route point 16 is bidirectionally connected to a control unit 18, which in turn is bidirectionally connected to a signal box 20.
- the control unit 18 determines the reception of this wake-up signal WS and issues to the route point 16 the command to send an interrogation signal AS to the train 2 crossing the route point 16.
- this interrogation signal can be transmitted continuously or discontinuously with a predeterminable duty cycle.
- This interrogation signal AS is received by a second transceiver unit 22, which in the present embodiment is attached only to the last wagon 10.
- the energy transmitted with the interrogation signal AS uses the second transceiver unit 22 to transmit a second signal, subsequently as a train end signal ZS, which is received by the route point 16.
- the receipt of this train end signal ZS is reported to the control unit 18, which deduces from the fact that the train end signal ZS has been received from the route point 16 on the correct passage of the complete train 2.
- the transmission of the interrogation signal AS is set.
- the frequency of the interrogation signal AS is 8 MHz in the present embodiment.
- the frequency of the train end signal ZS is in the range of 5 MHz.
- a level is selected for the interrogation signal AS and the train end signal ZS, which limits the range of the signals to the near range and avoids crosstalk to adjacent tracks.
- the control unit 18 then signals a signal to a second waypoint 24 (see Figure 2), which reports in this way the completeness of the train 2 to the driver's cab of the train 2.
- the train control can be changed in such a way that the train 2 must stop before the next possible signal or stop on the next possible siding and that a subsequent train is also stopped before entering this section.
- the train driver of the train 2 then has to run even in case of doubt even train 2 and check for completeness. If the train 2 is still complete, the second transceiver unit 22 must be checked for function and replaced, if necessary.
- the train operator then has to acknowledge the completeness of his train 2 and / or the re-operational readiness of the second transceiver 22 to an interlocking 20 and / or a hierarchically overlying control system via the train radio or another comparable measure such as via GSM-R.
- FIGS. 2 and 3 again schematically illustrate this method described above and, in addition to the representation according to FIG. 1, have the second waypoint 24 or further waypoints 24a and 24b, which are connected to the first waypoint via a data connection 26.
- the data exchange can take place via a cable, but also via wireless communication.
- the second waypoint 24 transmits the result of concentrated at the route point 16 train integrity control in the form of a train completion signal VS on the transmitting / receiving unit 12.
- the result of the train integrity check on the cab of the locomotive 4 or a control car is known and it can be initiated in response to the transmitted train completion signal VS appropriate measures.
- FIG. 3 differs from FIG. 2 in that only two waypoints 24a and 24b are provided, which may help to improve the spatial resolution of the train integrity check.
- the comparatively long train 2 'in Figure 3 therefore receives the Completeness signal VS only at the waypoint 24b, because in the crossing at the waypoint 24a the train has not crossed the waypoint 16 yet.
- the present embodiments show all train movements according to arrow 28 in the direction from left to right in the drawing.
- all the devices shown can be used in trains traveling in the reverse direction with the then also correspondingly inverse functionality.
- the transmitted signals may also contain further data, such as e.g. a train number or the like.
- the wake-up signal WS can, for example, also be radiated onto the route point 16, which in turn interrogates and reads out a transponder mark arranged at the vehicle head in a time-delayed manner.
- a wake-up signal WS (for example also 27 MHz emission lobe) could also be transmitted instead of a polling signal AS emitted from the path point 16 (in the reverse direction of pull 24 or 24b), whereupon a transponder mark attached to the end of the train is also read out at a later time. For example, completeness can be deduced by reading a transponder tag twice with the same ID twice.
- an ETCS balancing telegram can be provided.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP04029627A EP1561663B1 (de) | 2004-02-07 | 2004-12-15 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP04002735 | 2004-02-07 | ||
| EP04002735 | 2004-02-07 | ||
| EP04029627A EP1561663B1 (de) | 2004-02-07 | 2004-12-15 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1561663A1 EP1561663A1 (de) | 2005-08-10 |
| EP1561663B1 true EP1561663B1 (de) | 2007-02-28 |
Family
ID=37846915
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP04029627A Expired - Lifetime EP1561663B1 (de) | 2004-02-07 | 2004-12-15 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1561663B1 (es) |
| AT (1) | ATE355214T1 (es) |
| DE (1) | DE502004003030D1 (es) |
| ES (1) | ES2280893T3 (es) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2637697A (en) * | 2024-01-30 | 2025-08-06 | Siemens Mobility Ltd | Rail vehicle integrity proving device and method |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2898322B1 (fr) * | 2006-03-09 | 2009-12-11 | Alstom Belgium Sa | Systeme et procede de verification de l'integrite d'un train |
| DE102008016962A1 (de) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Detektion des Belegt- oder Freizustandes eines Gleisabschnittes |
| DE102008025188A1 (de) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-12-03 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Vorrichtung zur Detektion des Belegt- oder Freizustandes eines Gleisabschnittes |
| DE102013101927A1 (de) * | 2013-02-27 | 2014-08-28 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Vorrichtung, Zugendekontrollgerät, Schienenstrecke und Verfahren zur Datenübertragung |
| CN110758467B (zh) * | 2019-10-28 | 2023-11-03 | 虞萍 | 基于时间间隔比值的在先列车完整性判定方法及装置 |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE936339C (de) * | 1953-12-31 | 1955-12-07 | Pintsch Electro G M B H | Anordnung zur UEberwachung von Fahrzeugen, insbesondere fuer die Zugschlussmeldung von Eisenbahnzuegen |
| DE2902238C2 (de) * | 1979-01-20 | 1986-07-24 | Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart | Einrichtung zur Zugschlußüberwachung |
| DE2910770C3 (de) * | 1979-03-19 | 1986-11-13 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | Gleisüberwachungseinrichtung |
| DE4220130A1 (de) * | 1992-06-17 | 1993-12-23 | Siemens Ag | Gleisfreimeldesystem |
-
2004
- 2004-12-15 AT AT04029627T patent/ATE355214T1/de active
- 2004-12-15 ES ES04029627T patent/ES2280893T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-12-15 EP EP04029627A patent/EP1561663B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-12-15 DE DE502004003030T patent/DE502004003030D1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2637697A (en) * | 2024-01-30 | 2025-08-06 | Siemens Mobility Ltd | Rail vehicle integrity proving device and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP1561663A1 (de) | 2005-08-10 |
| ATE355214T1 (de) | 2006-03-15 |
| ES2280893T3 (es) | 2007-09-16 |
| DE502004003030D1 (de) | 2007-04-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE4302377C2 (de) | Einrichtung zum Automatisieren des Rangierbetriebes von Schienenfahrzeugen | |
| EP2170673B1 (de) | Verfahren und anordnung zum betreiben einer eisenbahnstrecke | |
| EP3448736B1 (de) | Verfahren sowie anordnung zum sichern eines bahnübergangs | |
| WO2018228758A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben eines spurgebundenen verkehrssystems | |
| DE102013219763A1 (de) | Schienenbrucherkennung | |
| DE102019204135A1 (de) | Verfahren zum gemischten Betrieb eines gleisgebundenen Streckenabschnitts mit Weiche sowie Streckenabschnitt und Weiche | |
| WO2020001924A1 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zum erkennen hinterherfahrender fahrzeuge | |
| EP3527459A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur detektion einer entgleisung mindestens einer achse eines schienenfahrzeugs | |
| EP3925851B1 (de) | System und verfahren zur durchführung einer einfahrkontrolle für ein schienenfahrzeug | |
| EP4079594B1 (de) | Überwachungsvorrichtung für ein schienensystem und verfahren | |
| EP3487745A1 (de) | Überwachung eines schienenfahrzeugs in einem etcs sicherungssystem | |
| EP0761523B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Einbindung von Bahnübergängen in die automatische Steuerung und Sicherung von Schienenfahrzeugen | |
| WO2011076516A1 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zur fahrwegsicherung spurgebundener fahrzeuge | |
| EP1561663B1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugvollständigkeitskontrolle eines schienengebundenen Zuges | |
| EP3681779B1 (de) | Verfahren, streckenseitige übertragungseinrichtung und subsystem für ein zugbeeinflussungssystem | |
| EP0849138B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines spurgebundenen Fahrzeugs auf Strecken mit gefährlichen Abschnitten sowie Kontrollsystem hierfür | |
| EP2178733B1 (de) | Verfahren zur erzielung einer aufwandsarmen einbindung von dezentralen feldkomponenten im schienengebundenen verkehr in ein steuerungssystem | |
| WO2008116794A1 (de) | Einrichtung zur unterstützung von bahnbetriebsprozessen | |
| EP2708439B1 (de) | Verfahren und System zum Extrahieren eines Signalbegriffs aus einem Magnetkreis | |
| EP2675690A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben eines spurgebundenen fahrzeugs sowie streckenseitige vorrichtung und anordnung mit einer solchen | |
| DE10260555A1 (de) | System zur Hinderniswarnung für spurgeführte Fahrzeuge | |
| EP2069183B1 (de) | Umschaltbare, sichere einrichtung zum empfangen und/oder aussenden von signalen zur zugbeeinflussung auf einem schienenfahrzeug | |
| WO2019042677A1 (de) | Freimeldesystem eines fahrstreckenabschnitts | |
| DE19749697A1 (de) | Einrichtung zur Steuerung des Eisenbahnbetriebes | |
| DE102005038386B4 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Sicherung der Zugfolge im Zugleitbetrieb |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050905 |
|
| AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502004003030 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20070412 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20070401346 Country of ref document: GR |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070528 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070531 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070628 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070730 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E001719 Country of ref document: HU |
|
| NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2280893 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
| GBV | Gb: ep patent (uk) treated as always having been void in accordance with gb section 77(7)/1977 [no translation filed] |
Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
| EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20071129 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071019 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080701 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCOW Free format text: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG;FREILAGERSTRASSE 40;8047 ZUERICH (CH) |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071215 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20091208 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20101208 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20110215 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20110113 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ A.G. Effective date: 20111231 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: ML Ref document number: 20070401346 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20120704 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20111231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20111216 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120704 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101215 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20121114 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20130312 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20130129 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 355214 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131215 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131215 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20150327 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131216 |