EP1618511A2 - Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient - Google Patents

Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient

Info

Publication number
EP1618511A2
EP1618511A2 EP04727826A EP04727826A EP1618511A2 EP 1618511 A2 EP1618511 A2 EP 1618511A2 EP 04727826 A EP04727826 A EP 04727826A EP 04727826 A EP04727826 A EP 04727826A EP 1618511 A2 EP1618511 A2 EP 1618511A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
musculoskeletal
individual
parameters
loads
determined
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04727826A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Georg N. Duda
Markus O. Heller
William R. Taylor
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Heller Markus O
Original Assignee
Heller Markus O
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE10331110A external-priority patent/DE10331110A1/de
Application filed by Heller Markus O filed Critical Heller Markus O
Publication of EP1618511A2 publication Critical patent/EP1618511A2/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4519—Muscles
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
    • A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
    • A61B5/1127—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique using markers
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/50—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Measuring devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor or mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/112—Gait analysis

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for simulating musculoskeletal stresses on a patient according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the object of the present invention is therefore to specify a method for evaluating musculoskeletal stresses on a patient, with which in particular surgical interventions or rehabilitation measures can be improved.
  • the object is achieved by a method for simulating musculoskeletal loads with the features of claim 1.
  • individual musculoskeletal parameters of the patient are first determined.
  • automatic measurement of anthropometric parameters, automatic derivation of anthroprometric parameters from a system for computer-assisted surgery, in particular a surgical navigation system, and / or the position and / or orientation of joints are determined.
  • a surgical navigation system provides the surgeon with a virtual representation of the operating area. This representation is created, for example, using CT images taken before the operation. The surgeon can also observe the movements of instruments in the virtual representation, whereby he can follow a treatment plan previously arranged in the virtual representation. This also enables a comparison of the real OR situation with the planned situation. It is also possible to actively control instruments using the navigation system.
  • the method and the device for carrying out the method can, for example, be installed on a central server.
  • the users eg therapists, surgeons, technicians
  • the data can be used during the planning and subsequent steps during therapy.
  • a center can also be set up that centrally maintains and distributes data for different users.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads are automatically determined from the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads are evaluated with the aid of at least one target criterion.
  • the contact forces or the amount of movement of a joint or the fragment movements of a fracture can serve as the target criterion.
  • the method according to the invention can be used to support surgical procedures, such as interventions for total joint replacement, interventions on ligament structures, interventions in the context of conversion osteotomies, and interventions in the context of fracture care for humans and animals.
  • surgical procedures can be supported in planning, implementation and evaluation.
  • the surgeon or therapist can directly assess the effects of a planned intervention non-invasively and can evaluate and adjust his operation or therapy plan accordingly.
  • the planning, implementation and evaluation of surgical procedures can be objectified even before the intervention.
  • At least one of the musculoskeletal parameters is determined after the assessment of the individual musculoskeletal loads and / or the orientation of a joint varies. Then the individual musculoskeletal stresses are again determined automatically, taking into account the at least one varied musculoskeletal parameter. A computer-aided assessment for individual musculoskeletal stresses with regard to the at least one target criterion is then carried out again. In this way, a comparison can be made between two possible situations or operating plans. For example, it can be examined how a different position of a joint behaves with regard to the at least one target criterion, for example with regard to the contact forces of the joint that occur. This enables precise operation planning.
  • the varied parameter can be optimized in a further development of the invention by repeating the variation of the at least one parameter until a defined target value of at least one target criterion is reached. This optimizes the target criterion and thus the parameter set iteratively. In this way, for example, the optimal position of an artificial joint can be determined.
  • the musculoskeletal parameters determined in this way are advantageously output on an output device and / or stored in a storage device. Additionally or alternatively, the output data can also be transmitted to a computer-assisted surgery system and / or in the surgical navigation system, so that these data can also be available intra-operatively.
  • the individual and varied musculoskeletal parameters obtained in this iterative procedure and corresponding to the target value advantageously serve as the basis for planning an operative intervention. In particular, they serve as the basis for the selection of components, for example different joint types, with regard to the positioning of the components or the decision about the removal of temporary implants.
  • the individual musculoskeletal parameters can be varied taking into account the data of implants, in particular their dimensions and ranges of movement. For example, different implants can be tested against each other and the optimal implant for the respective patient anatomy can be selected taking into account the respective target criteria.
  • the individual or the varied musculoskeletal parameters are compared with the musculoskeletal reference parameters stored in a database, with musculoskeletal reference loads corresponding to the musculoskeletal reference loads being determined as the individual musculoskeletal loads.
  • the musculoskeletal reference parameters can be present in the database as discrete values. When present Discrete values make sense to compare the reference parameters with the individual musculoskeletal parameters using functional relationships, in particular using interpolation.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads are calculated from the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters.
  • the calculation is advantageously based on a biomechanical and / or a mathematical model.
  • the biomechanical or mathematical model used in each case is already adapted to the individual musculoskeletal parameters.
  • a biomechanical and / or a mathematical model can be selected from at least one database on the basis of the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters.
  • the selected model is then optimized and adapted to the individual musculoskeletal parameters determined. It is therefore advantageous to calculate the individual musculoskeletal loads with the aid of a musculoskeletal model, taking into account the individual patient anatomy or taking into account the individual anthropometric data of the patient.
  • these individual musculoskeletal loads are advantageously visualized.
  • the respective treating doctor or therapist can use the visualization to quickly and easily check and change their treatment plan.
  • the indi- vidual musculoskeletal stresses are represented graphically and / or numerically using an anatomical model.
  • a rehabilitation process can also be assessed and / or controlled, for example, by recognizing. For example, corresponding data can be accessed via the Internet.
  • the individual musculoskeletal parameters of the patient are determined by measurements.
  • at least one of the individual musculoskeletal parameters can be measured automatically. Such a measurement can take place in particular by means of image recognition, computer tomography and / or by means of motion sensors.
  • individual movement parameters in particular gait parameters
  • gait parameters are determined and these are used for the automatic determination of individual musculoskeletal loads.
  • individual gait parameters can be obtained by taking pictures of legs in motion. Three-dimensional positions of the body parts can then be determined from the images. The ground reaction force that acts on the foot from the ground is also measured. It is particularly advantageous if the individual gait parameters are determined from personal data stored in a database and / or are recorded individually for one person.
  • a device having the features of claim 22.
  • Such a device can be implemented as a software and / or hardware-based variant in a data processing system.
  • This data processing system then has a link to a database with which musculoskeletal loads and / or individual movement parameters can be stored.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the method according to the invention in a first embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 shows a detailed section from the method of FIG. 2, the calculation of musculoskeletal loads being shown;
  • FIG. 6 shows a possible visualization of musculoskeletal stress.
  • FIG. 1 schematically shows the method according to the invention.
  • the individual musculoskeletal parameters of the respective patient are determined.
  • Other anthropometric data related to the automatic determination of the individual musculoskeletal loads can also be included here.
  • the determination of the individual musculoskeletal parameters in step 1 can be determined by automatic measurements, for example taken from computer tomography, by external measurements of the patient, by movement analyzes or by other measurement methods. Additionally or alternatively, anthropometric parameters can be automatically adopted by a navigation system.
  • step 40 e.g. include individual movement parameters in the process.
  • a gait analysis can be used.
  • the movements of the individual leg segments during certain activities e.g. running, climbing stairs, getting up from a chair, squats etc.
  • reflective markers are arranged on a patient and can be detected by the measuring system.
  • the spatial and temporal position of the body segments e.g. pelvis, thigh, knee, lower leg, foot
  • a three-dimensional movement image of the body segments can be obtained from the two-dimensional images. Also at the
  • Gait analysis measured the reaction force of the floor to the feet.
  • the movement parameters can be calculated from database values of a patient (e.g. height, weight) and / or on the patient. Even if gait parameters are used in the following, movement parameters of other parts of the body can in principle also be used.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads are automatically determined from the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters and, if applicable, from the individual movement parameters. This determination can be made, for example, by comparing the determined musculoskeletal parameters with reference parameters stored in a database, or by calculating the respective individual musculoskeletal loads.
  • step 3 of the method shown in FIG. 1 the automatically determined, individual musculoskeletal strains are now evaluated with the aid of a computer with the aid of a target criterion.
  • the target criteria can be, for example, the contact forces or the extent of movement of a joint or the necessary fragment movements of a fracture. A combination of several target criteria can also be considered and evaluated.
  • the evaluation or the individual burdens are then output or documented in step 6.
  • step 4 a further development of the method can be used to check in step 4 whether the target criterion has reached a previously defined target value. If this is not the case, step 5 at least one of the individual parameters varies. This is followed by the automatic determination of the individual burdens in step 2 and the assessment of these individual burdens with regard to a target criterion in step 3. If the target value in step 4 is still not reached, a new variation of at least one parameter takes place in step 5. If the target value is reached, the output or documentation takes place in step 6. It is also possible that the data output is automatically on a surgical navigation system takes place.
  • This iterative procedure enables a parameter set to be optimized with regard to one or more target criteria.
  • the individual parameter set which is optimized with regard to the individual musculoskeletal loads or with regard to the target criterion, can then be used for planning, for example, an operative intervention or for planning therapeutic measures.
  • the variation of the at least one parameter in step 5 of the figure can also take into account the dimensions or other parameters of implants. By varying the parameters in step 5, different implants can be tested against each other.
  • the data obtained and processed are saved and can be used for rehabilitation.
  • the responsible doctor can access the data via the internet in order to have a specially adapted rehabilitation plan, e.g. to design for physiotherapy.
  • Step 1 determines the individual musculoskeletal parameters of the respective patient, for example by automatic measurement.
  • the automatic determination of the individual musculoskeletal loads from the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters can then take place either in step 20 via a database query or in step 21 via a calculation of the individual musculoskeletal loads.
  • the individual gait parameters are also included (step 40).
  • step 22 then results in the individual musculoskeletal stress of the respective patient.
  • the individual musculoskeletal stress is now prepared for the visualization in step 30. How this happens in detail is discussed in the description of the other figures.
  • step 31 the respective individual musculoskeletal stresses are visualized. From the visualization, the musculoskeletal loads are now evaluated with the aid of a computer to determine whether at least one target criterion has reached a specified target value. If this is the case in step 4, the corresponding parameters and the musculoskeletal stresses are output or documented in step 6. If the target value is not reached in step 4, at least one parameter is changed or varied using the visualization in step 50.
  • Step 21 performed. This iterative process is long demonstrated until the target value of at least one target criterion is reached in step 4.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 now show the automatic determination of the individual musculoskeletal loads in the two variants mentioned.
  • the individual musculoskeletal parameters determined in step 2 are compared with reference parameters stored in a stress database 200.
  • the reference parameters of the load database 200 can be present either as discrete values or as continuous values.
  • the comparison between the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters and the reference parameters of the stress database is carried out using functional relationships, in particular using an interpolation.
  • the reference loads corresponding to the reference parameters closest to the determined parameters are then output as the individual musculoskeletal load in step 22.
  • FIG. 4 shows the second variant of the automatic determination of the musculoskeletal loads. From the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters in
  • Step 1 is a suitable anatomical from a database 210 select mechanical and / or biomechanical model or a suitable movement model.
  • the selected model is adapted in step 211 to the determined individual musculoskeletal parameters 1.
  • an individual biomechanical model is obtained which is individually adapted to the respective patient.
  • Individual gait parameters 40 are also included.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads are now calculated in step 213. These individual musculoskeletal stresses are then assigned to the individual musculoskeletal stress in step 22.
  • FIG. 5 shows the individual process steps for the visualization of the individual musculoskeletal loads.
  • the individual musculoskeletal stresses of step 22 are prepared together with the data of a database 310 of an anatomical model in step 311.
  • the individual musculoskeletal loads can be assigned to individual anatomical parts.
  • Data can also be processed in a surgical navigation system. The data linked and processed in this way are visualized in step 312.
  • Such a visualization is shown, for example, in FIG. 6.
  • Individual parameters 1 to m can be varied using the visualization, for example using a graphic representation, on a computer screen using a slide 500.
  • the value of the respective parameter is in a separate display 501 is displayed. This can be an angle or a distance, for example.
  • the musculoskeletal load is visualized using a curve 502, which shows the loads, for example, during a walking cycle or while climbing stairs.
  • the attending doctor or therapist can now set different values of the respective parameter by moving the slider 500 and in doing so observe how the exposure data change.
  • the description of the figures relates to a special joint, namely a hip joint.
  • the teaching according to the invention can in principle be used for all joints, in particular also knee joints, shoulder joints, ankle joints, temporomandibular joints, elbow joints and / or spinal joints.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé et un dispositif de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient, notamment pour la préparation ou le contrôle d'interventions chirurgicales et/ou pour la planification ou le contrôle de la rééducation. A cet effet, des paramètres musculo-squelettiques individuels du patient sont d'abord déterminés, notamment par mesure automatique de paramètres anthropométriques et/ou de la position et/ou de l'orientation d'articulations, en particulier de données de marche. Ensuite, des contraintes musculo-squelettiques sont déterminées automatiquement à partir des paramètres musculo-squelettiques du patient. Les contraintes musculo-squelettiques ainsi déterminées sont évaluées par ordinateur en vue d'au moins un critère cible, notamment des forces de contact ou du niveau de mouvement d'une articulation, ou des mouvements fragmentaires d'une fracture. Ledit procédé d'évaluation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient permet d'améliorer des interventions chirurgicales ou des mesures de rééducation.
EP04727826A 2003-04-17 2004-04-16 Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient Withdrawn EP1618511A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10318887 2003-04-17
DE10331110A DE10331110A1 (de) 2003-04-17 2003-07-04 Verfahren zur Simulation muskulo-skelettaler Belastungen eines Patienten
PCT/DE2004/000839 WO2004095341A2 (fr) 2003-04-17 2004-04-16 Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1618511A2 true EP1618511A2 (fr) 2006-01-25

Family

ID=33311754

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04727826A Withdrawn EP1618511A2 (fr) 2003-04-17 2004-04-16 Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060287612A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1618511A2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004095341A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7308826B2 (en) * 2004-06-16 2007-12-18 The University Of Tokyo Muscular strength acquiring method and device based on musculoskeletal model
US8384916B2 (en) 2008-07-24 2013-02-26 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Dynamic three-dimensional imaging of ear canals
DE102008049563A1 (de) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur Auswertung wenigstens eines Bilddatensatzes
US11511156B2 (en) 2016-03-12 2022-11-29 Arie Shavit Training system and methods for designing, monitoring and providing feedback of training
CN110801230A (zh) * 2019-10-10 2020-02-18 西安理工大学 一种针对下肢骨折康复效果的评价方法
CN111803327B (zh) * 2020-07-02 2022-09-09 山东康盛医疗器械有限公司 基于人体部位检测的骨骼拉伸系统以及相应终端
CN115690898B (zh) * 2022-09-23 2026-04-21 北京航空航天大学 一种步态分析方法和装置
CN119791840B (zh) * 2024-12-17 2025-08-26 中国科学院自动化研究所 肘关节假体安装位置的评估方法、装置、电子设备、存储介质和程序产品

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4655227A (en) * 1985-06-06 1987-04-07 Diagnospine Research Inc. Equipment for the detection of mechanical injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, using a mathematical model
US6205411B1 (en) * 1997-02-21 2001-03-20 Carnegie Mellon University Computer-assisted surgery planner and intra-operative guidance system
DE29719250U1 (de) * 1997-10-30 1998-05-07 Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften eV, 53757 Sankt Augustin Körperbelastungsmeß- und Analysesystem
US7901400B2 (en) * 1998-10-23 2011-03-08 Covidien Ag Method and system for controlling output of RF medical generator
AU2001249517A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2001-10-08 Massachusetts General Hospital Method and system for viewing kinematic and kinetic information

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004095341A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004095341A2 (fr) 2004-11-04
WO2004095341A3 (fr) 2005-06-23
US20060287612A1 (en) 2006-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2593031B1 (fr) Méthode optique pour déterminer un changement de longueur d'une jambe
EP2092907B1 (fr) Calcul de la position de parties du corps en fonction de la symétrie anatomique
DE202018006818U1 (de) System zur optimierten Gelenküberwachung in der Physiotherapie
DE102006056399A1 (de) Funktionsgelenk-Arthroplastikverfahren
DE102011106812A1 (de) Registrierung von anatomischen Datensätzen
EP3644852B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure et dispositif permettant de déterminer les rapports de longueur, la position et/ou le rayon de déplacement des extrémités inférieures d'un patient alité
DE102018128514B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Durchführen eines Prothesenaufbaus
EP4522024A1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode de normalisation de l'orientation axiale et de la position de données cinématiques par rapport à une articulation corporelle d'un patient
EP1618511A2 (fr) Procede de simulation des contraintes musculo-squelettiques d'un patient
DE102022111284A1 (de) Implantat-Assistenzverfahren und Implantat-Assistenzsystem für einen optimierten Einsatz oder Gelenkersatz
EP4017425B1 (fr) Procédé de fabrication d'une emboîture de prothèse
EP2164393A2 (fr) Procédé de détermination d'informations importantes pour la caractérisation de mouvements articulaires
EP4384103B1 (fr) Système et méthode de planification préopératoire d'une endoprothèse du genou
DE10331110A1 (de) Verfahren zur Simulation muskulo-skelettaler Belastungen eines Patienten
DE102020100366A1 (de) Verfahren zur 3D-Bewegungsanalyse und Sofortfeedback für Trainingsübungen
WO2020151944A1 (fr) Procédé pour déterminer un modèle d'une extrémité, support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur et système
EP3912555B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination du point de rotation d'une articulation du genou, procédé de fabrication d'une endoprothèse d'articulation du genou ou d'une orthèse chevauchant l'articulation du genou et un dispositif pour l'exécution d'un procédé de détermination du point de rotation d'une articulation du genou
EP4408274A1 (fr) Système à usage médical et procédé
DE102013109057A1 (de) Verfahren zur Planung und Vorbereitung eines operativen Eingriffs in den menschlichen oder tierischen Körper, Vorrichtung zum Ausführen eines solchen Eingriffs und Verwendung der Vorrichtung
DE102019129376B4 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Ansteuerung von Geräten, die externe Belastungen auf den Körper von Menschen und Tieren erzeugen
Scherb et al. Patientenspezifische Modellierung des passiven Bewegungsapparates als Grundlage für die präoperative Abschätzung postoperativer Folgeerscheinungen des endoprothetischen Hüftgelenkersatzes
DE102023129563A1 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogramm zum Bewerten eines Bewegungsablaufes
EP4518809B1 (fr) Procédure d'installation d'un appareillage orthopédique
DE102019131703B4 (de) Vorrichtung zur durchführung einer individuellen bewegungsanalyse und -therapie eines patienten
EP4550345A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance et de visualisation du processus de rééducation soulageant la colonne vertébrale et système pour mettre en uvre le procédé

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051117

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20131111

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20140522