EP2250065A1 - Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules - Google Patents

Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules

Info

Publication number
EP2250065A1
EP2250065A1 EP09717001A EP09717001A EP2250065A1 EP 2250065 A1 EP2250065 A1 EP 2250065A1 EP 09717001 A EP09717001 A EP 09717001A EP 09717001 A EP09717001 A EP 09717001A EP 2250065 A1 EP2250065 A1 EP 2250065A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
collision
areas
vehicles
warning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP09717001A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2250065B1 (fr
Inventor
Jens Braband
Bernhard Evers
Stefan Gerken
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=40651450&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2250065(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens AG, Siemens Corp filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP2250065A1 publication Critical patent/EP2250065A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2250065B1 publication Critical patent/EP2250065B1/fr
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L21/00Station blocking between signal boxes in one yard
    • B61L21/10Arrangements for trains which are closely following one another
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L23/00Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
    • B61L23/22Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for controlling traffic in two directions over the same pair of rails
    • B61L23/24Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for controlling traffic in two directions over the same pair of rails using token systems, e.g. train staffs, tablets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/02Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or trains
    • B61L25/025Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L2205/00Communication or navigation systems for railway traffic
    • B61L2205/04Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. global positioning system [GPS]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for signal-technical securing rail-bound vehicles, which are connected via a data thennfunkksystem with at least one central monitoring device and a related safety system.
  • train control systems are based on a train track side ⁇ locating means locating devices, such as beacons or axle counter. These train protection systems are highly centralized, so that the smallest changes ⁇ ments, for example, on the track layout, require considerable adaptation effort.
  • Another disadvantage is that a high financial outlay is created by the setup, cabling and maintenance of external elements. Satellite-based methods currently do not provide sufficient recuperzi ⁇ sion to be set once the traditional backup method for locating.
  • the invention has for its object to provide a method for signaling backup rail-bound vehicles and a related security system, which allow simple means, especially without track elements for locating a technical support for detecting and avoiding a collision hazard.
  • the object is achieved in that the vehicles transmit their instantaneous position data via the radio data transmission system to the monitoring device, that a safety range dependent on a vehicle speed and a measured value dispersion of the position data acquisition method used and a warning range encompassing it are determined around the vehicles and that the monitoring device based on the vehicle-specific
  • a security system in which a transceiver is provided on the vehicle side, whose transmitting component is connected to a device for position data acquisition, in which a device for determining a security area as a function of a vehicle speed and a measured value spread of the device for Positioning of the vehicle and a safety area comprehensive warning area is provided around the vehicle and in which the monitoring device comprises means for determining journey-determining data on the basis of the vehicle-specific position data, safety areas and warning areas such that collision-relevant Students- Lapses of security areas are avoided and collision-relevant overlaps of warning areas is counteracted, the driving-determining data, at least in the event of collision-relevant overlaps via the radio data transmission system to the affected vehicles are transferable.
  • the vehicle In the safety area, the vehicle is completely, ie including entrained wagons embedded, the extent must correspond at least in the direction of travel at least the speed-dependent braking distance.
  • the size of the security area is also dependent on the measured value scattering , ie on the measurement inaccuracy, in the position data acquisition. It should be striven that this safety area can never overlap collision relevant with the safety ⁇ range of another vehicle. For this purpose, set a warning area to the safety area around ges already been a backlash at its overlap with the warning area of another Fahrzeu-, if it is indeed plural ⁇ a collision-relevant overlap.
  • Nonsecurity overlaps are possible in particular when two vehicles meet on rallelumblen Pa ⁇ or overtake without meeting for can. Even at scheduled scheduled at the identified position expected vehicles that wait for single-track on a neighboring station siding or a siding on driving license, can be recognized as uncritical.
  • the monitoring means may evaluate starting from the start position of each vehicle on the basis of point position and the present position data of the vehicles without further Informa ⁇ functions the danger of overlaps.
  • non-collision-relevant overlaps are detected by a token method.
  • the token method known per se, it is ensured that only one vehicle always moves on the monitored route section under the full responsibility of the driver and all other vehicles are in overlapping warning zones or, if applicable, in overlapping security zones.
  • the sequence must be manually controllable, wherein a token can possibly also be returned to the central monitoring device.
  • the method of token-based restricts the movement of the vehicles, the driver of the moving vehicle is responsible for ensuring that no collision with a stationary vehicle occurs. The safety level achievable in this way corresponds to the previous safety on secondary lines.
  • an emergency braking is provided according to claim 5 ⁇ .
  • the vehicle-internally determined position data are determined according to the preferred embodiment of claim 6 satellite-based.
  • the position data determination can be continued for the last projectable time using the last position and the speed.
  • can be used as well odometrisch determined position data.
  • the relatively wide spread of the location data, in particular satellite location data is used for the determination of the safety area and the warning area and therefore no longer poses a problem. Since the vehicles are moving objects, the safety and warning area is speed-dependent for to individually determine each vehicle.
  • the speed is not transmitted together with the location data to the central moni ⁇ monitoring device, also valid in the stretch maximummaige ⁇ speed for determining the safety zone and warning area can be used.
  • different spreads occur with respect to the location accuracy, which also go into the determination of the warning and security areas.
  • the stability of the radio data transmission Transmission are taken into account. Due to the use of radio technology, it can always come to a failure of the data connection between the vehicle and monitoring device. The maximum time for such a connection failure can be additionally included in the determination of the warning and safety area.
  • the single figure shows two vehicles for a safety ⁇ range 1.1 and 1.2 and a warning range 2.1 and 2.2 in interaction with a central monitoring device 3.
  • the vehicle not shown, are completely embedded in the security area JE INT 1.1 and 1.2, while the Warning area 2.1 or 2.2 completely covers the security area 1.1 or 1.2.
  • the vehicles are equipped with Empfangsgerä ⁇ th to satellite positioning, the measured value litter ⁇ clothes, which can also include neighboring tracks, the extension of the security zone 1.1 and 1.2 and also 2.1 and 2.2 largely determines the Warnbe ⁇ rich.
  • the vehicles ste ⁇ hen via data radio links 4.1 and 4.2 via wireless communication, for example.
  • the surveil ⁇ monitoring device 3 provides the basis of the location data, security areas 1.1 and 1.2 and warning ranges 2.1 or 2.2 determines whether there is an overlap of warning areas 2.1 and 2.2 and, if so, whether this overlap is collision-relevant. The latter is only the case when the vehicles drive on the moving ⁇ che soft layer-specific driveway.
  • the points ⁇ position is known in the monitoring device 3, so that the monitoring device 3 is able to recognize whether collision danger actually exists or whether the vehicles pass each other only on neighboring tracks, in which case also safety areas 1.1 and 1.2 at the overlap can be ⁇ shares.
  • the monitoring device 3 Only in the event of a real risk of collision, the monitoring device 3 transmits warning messages to the vehicles involved, which are then decelerated in the responsibility of the driver or automatically forcibly braked via a ent ⁇ speaking vehicle device.
  • the described method allows the use of inaccurate in-vehicle positioning methods, in particular satellite positioning, whereby a very high level of security can be achieved even without the use of the conventional, cost-intensive route safety technology.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
EP09717001A 2008-02-29 2009-02-23 Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules Revoked EP2250065B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102008012416A DE102008012416A1 (de) 2008-02-29 2008-02-29 Verfahren zur signaltechnischen Sicherung schienengebundener Fahrzeuge und diesbezügliches Sicherungssystem
PCT/EP2009/052096 WO2009109475A1 (fr) 2008-02-29 2009-02-23 Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2250065A1 true EP2250065A1 (fr) 2010-11-17
EP2250065B1 EP2250065B1 (fr) 2011-12-28

Family

ID=40651450

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09717001A Revoked EP2250065B1 (fr) 2008-02-29 2009-02-23 Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20100327125A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2250065B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE538986T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2009221373A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102008012416A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2009109475A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2302416B1 (fr) * 2009-09-28 2013-06-19 Sick Ag Scanner de sécurité
DE102009049081A1 (de) * 2009-10-06 2011-04-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben einer Eisenbahnstrecke
US9355548B2 (en) * 2009-12-03 2016-05-31 Bi Incorporated Systems and methods for contact avoidance
DE102011076047A1 (de) * 2011-05-18 2012-11-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Zugsicherungssystem mit puls-code-modulierter Führerstandssignalisierung
US9134411B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2015-09-15 General Electric Company Distance estimation system and method for a railway vehicle
US8751127B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2014-06-10 General Electric Company Position estimation system and method
CN107364434A (zh) 2013-09-03 2017-11-21 梅特罗姆铁路公司 铁路车辆信号执行和分离控制
US11814088B2 (en) 2013-09-03 2023-11-14 Metrom Rail, Llc Vehicle host interface module (vHIM) based braking solutions
US9663127B2 (en) 2014-10-28 2017-05-30 Smartdrive Systems, Inc. Rail vehicle event detection and recording system
US9487222B2 (en) 2015-01-08 2016-11-08 Smartdrive Systems, Inc. System and method for aggregation display and analysis of rail vehicle event information
US9902410B2 (en) 2015-01-08 2018-02-27 Smartdrive Systems, Inc. System and method for synthesizing rail vehicle event information
US9296401B1 (en) * 2015-01-12 2016-03-29 Smartdrive Systems, Inc. Rail vehicle event triggering system and method
DE102016205119A1 (de) * 2016-03-29 2017-10-05 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft System zur Steuerung von Stellwerken im Bahnverkehr
DE102016218469A1 (de) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sicherung einer eisenbahntechnischen Anlage
US11349589B2 (en) 2017-08-04 2022-05-31 Metrom Rail, Llc Methods and systems for decentralized rail signaling and positive train control
HUE054645T2 (hu) * 2017-09-01 2021-09-28 Siemens Mobility GmbH Berendezés és eljárás vasúti jármûhálózat üzemeltetésére
DE102018213581A1 (de) * 2018-08-13 2020-02-13 Siemens Mobility GmbH Verfahren zum Kollisionsschutz von Schienenfahrzeugen
EP4017779A1 (fr) 2019-08-19 2022-06-29 SEW-EURODRIVE GmbH & Co. KG Procédé pour faire fonctionner un système comprenant des première et deuxième parties mobiles et comprenant un contrôleur fixe, et système de mise en uvre d'un procédé
CN112429017B (zh) * 2020-11-10 2022-01-28 卡斯柯信号有限公司 基于单列车自动防护的区域控制器内列车联挂控制方法

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6218961B1 (en) * 1996-10-23 2001-04-17 G.E. Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. Method and system for proximity detection and location determination
CA2301215C (fr) * 1997-08-18 2005-10-11 Dynamic Vehicle Safety Systems, Ltd. Systeme anticollision utilisant un dispositif gps et un detecteur de proximite de train
GB2362742A (en) * 2000-05-23 2001-11-28 Oxford Forecasting Services Lt Rail safety system
DE10042574A1 (de) * 2000-08-15 2002-02-28 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Steuerung eines Zuges
GB0328202D0 (en) * 2003-12-05 2004-01-07 Westinghouse Brake & Signal Railway vehicle detection

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009109475A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100327125A1 (en) 2010-12-30
ATE538986T1 (de) 2012-01-15
DE102008012416A1 (de) 2009-09-10
EP2250065B1 (fr) 2011-12-28
AU2009221373A1 (en) 2009-09-11
WO2009109475A1 (fr) 2009-09-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2250065B1 (fr) Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules
DE69009551T2 (de) System zur Steuerung des Verlaufs von mehreren Eisenbahnzügen auf einem Netz.
EP2334535B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour accroître la précision d'arrêt d'un objet déplacé
EP3612430B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un système de circulation guidé et dispositif
EP2531391B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle de l'intégrité d'un train
DE102015210427A1 (de) Verfahren sowie Einrichtung zum Ermitteln einer Fahrerlaubnis für ein spurgebundenes Fahrzeug
EP3448737B1 (fr) Procédé de sécurisation pour passage à niveau
EP3608201B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de simulation d'un trajet d'un véhicule moteur
WO2018189078A1 (fr) Assistance à des systèmes d'acheminement de trains par transmission en ligne d'informations concernant la puissance de freinage
DE102008003872A1 (de) Verfahren zur Kollisionswarnung und Kollisionswarnsystem
DE102011106345B4 (de) Streckenvalidierung
EP3795451B1 (fr) Procédé de localisation d'un véhicule dans une station destinée à un arrêt du véhicule
EP2870047B1 (fr) Fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire
WO2019243341A1 (fr) Système de protection de train flexible
WO1995001900A1 (fr) Systeme de liberation de l'ouverture des portes de vehicules sur rails
EP3124351A1 (fr) Procédé de post-équipement de parties de réseau ferroviaire existant avec un système de sécurisation de train
EP0849138B1 (fr) Méthode pour le fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire sur des voies avec des sections dangereuses ainsi que système de commande pour cela
EP3829951A2 (fr) Système de commande automatisé côté véhicule pour un véhicule ferroviaire
EP4124540A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de faire fonctionner un arrêt automatique pour un véhicule guidé sur rails
DE102010004653A1 (de) Steuerungsverfahren und -anordnung für ein Schienenfahrzeug
EP2674345B1 (fr) Dispositif de détection d'états sur des tronçons de voie ferrée
DE102020206005A1 (de) Fahrbetriebsanordnung und Verfahren zum Steuern eines Schienenfahrzeugs
DE102012206479A1 (de) Verfahren zur Hilfsbedienung eines Fahrwegelements sowie betriebsleittechnisches System
DE10240376B4 (de) Sicheres Zugmeldebuch
DE102016218469A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sicherung einer eisenbahntechnischen Anlage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100804

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 538986

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502009002310

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120328

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120329

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20120127

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120428

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120328

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120420

Year of fee payment: 4

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS A.G.

Effective date: 20120228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120430

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MP S.R.L.

Effective date: 20120927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20121031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502009002310

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120927

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120228

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120229

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 502009002310

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 502009002310

Country of ref document: DE

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20130504

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20130504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20111228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R107

Ref document number: 502009002310

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MA03

Ref document number: 538986

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228