EP2274714A1 - Procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour réduire au minimum et quantifier les émissions dans la chaîne de fabrication de produits textiles - Google Patents
Procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour réduire au minimum et quantifier les émissions dans la chaîne de fabrication de produits textilesInfo
- Publication number
- EP2274714A1 EP2274714A1 EP09728003A EP09728003A EP2274714A1 EP 2274714 A1 EP2274714 A1 EP 2274714A1 EP 09728003 A EP09728003 A EP 09728003A EP 09728003 A EP09728003 A EP 09728003A EP 2274714 A1 EP2274714 A1 EP 2274714A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- product
- record
- computer
- data record
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
Definitions
- the invention relates to methods and computer-implemented systems for minimizing and quantifying emissions in the manufacture of products, in particular textile products.
- the finished textile products are manufactured via a multitude of intermediate steps and delivered to the end user via the usual trade routes.
- emissions occur which can endanger or negatively affect humans, animals and the environment, in particular air, soil and water, as well as the climate.
- the intermediate and final products may also contain potential emissions, ie they present a certain risk of emissions occurring at a later date.
- chemical compounds which have remained on the finished textile products can be absorbed by the wearer via the skin, or can enter the water cycle during washing.
- FIG. 1 the production chain of a textile product is illustrated schematically and by way of example.
- a first stage I the raw materials for the textiles are produced.
- natural materials such as cotton, wool and silk
- this is done through agricultural cultivation 1 .1, in which humans and the environment 1 .5 can be contaminated by chemical compounds such as fertilizers and pesticides.
- the participating workers 1 .4 can also be directly endangered by the substances used.
- the necessary energy requirements, for example for transport, are also covered by fossil fuels, which leads to the emission of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.
- the fiber products 2 are processed via various intermediate stages (for example spinning, weaving, etc.) into yarn and subsequently to textile surfaces (fabric). Even with these steps, emissions are released and energy is consumed.
- the textile surface products are finished, that is, they are treated and modified by various methods to achieve the desired properties.
- the fabrics are colored, antistatic, flame-retardant, dirt-repellent, or crease-poor equipped, preshrunk, etc. This is done via a variety of methods known in the art, in which case chemical compounds are required, in turn, from an external supplier 1 .3 come.
- the textile surface products are processed into the actual textiles, ie garments, industrial textiles, upholstery fabrics, etc. Subsequently the transport takes place via the logistics and trade chain 1 .1 2 to the end user 1 .1 3, who finally wears the textiles.
- the remaining on the textiles chemical compounds can in turn burden the carrier 1 .1 3. For example, certain substances can trigger skin allergies, and heavy metals can be incorporated through the skin.
- the appropriate professionals are aware of a variety of ways for the various individual intermediate steps to avoid emissions or to minimize their quantity or their negative effect.
- the use of pesticides can be reduced to a minimum, and health and safety regulations can be applied to workers, etc.
- water and air pollution and job safety can be reduced with appropriate protection measures.
- certain classes of substances can not be used or are used only to a limited extent, suitable cleaning systems for water and exhaust gases can be provided, workers' workloads can be monitored, and much more.
- Such optimizations are also constantly being developed and improved.
- the emission of greenhouse gases can be optimized by energy-saving measures and minimizing transport routes.
- certain classes of substances may also be avoided, for example heavy metal-containing dyes.
- An object of the invention is to provide an advantageous method and a computer-implemented system for minimizing and quantifying emissions in the manufacture of products, which does not have the above-mentioned and other disadvantages.
- Such a method should be cost-efficient, flexible and reproducible.
- most suitable intermediates and semi-finished products should be selectable.
- the emission values for the individual production steps, and ultimately for the entire production chain should be minimized.
- the term "product” generally includes any type of starting material (for example cotton, polymer pellets), semi-finished product (for example yarn, fabric), auxiliaries (for example colorants, finishing liquor), and end product (for example finished textile product, trousers, furniture upholstery ) Understood.
- starting material for example cotton, polymer pellets
- semi-finished product for example yarn, fabric
- auxiliaries for example colorants, finishing liquor
- end product for example finished textile product, trousers, furniture upholstery
- FIG. 2 schematically shows the mode of operation of a computer-implemented system according to the invention as well as the basic sequences of a method according to the invention.
- an identification code 21 is assigned to a specific product 2 originating from a specific source 22.
- a first data record 31 is recorded, which contains information on said product 2 and on the realized and / or potential emissions 3, 3 ', 3 "associated with the production of said product 2.
- an evaluation protocol 4 is determined to determine at least a characteristic value 32 with which said emissions 3, 3 ', 3 "can be quantified and / or qualified; and then determined on the basis of the first data record 31 according to the said evaluation protocol 4, the at least one characteristic value 32.
- a second data record 51 is generated 51 1, which comprises the identification code 21 and the at least one determined characteristic value 32, and stored in a database 5.
- the product 2 may optionally also be a particular lot or batch.
- This unambiguous identification by means of the identification code 21 subsequently not only permits the assignment of general data and information 31 2, such as, for example, connection-specific values, toxicological properties, possible uses, etc., but also specific data and information 31 1, which relates specifically to the Product 2 or its preparation 1 .1, 1 .2, 1 .8, 1 .9, 1 .1 0 relate.
- general data and information 31 2 such as, for example, connection-specific values, toxicological properties, possible uses, etc.
- specific data and information 31 1 which relates specifically to the Product 2 or its preparation 1 .1, 1 .2, 1 .8, 1 .9, 1 .1 0 relate.
- the emission values of certain manufacturing plants, the existing sewage and exhaust air purification equipment, analysis results of specific production batches, energy consumption, transport costs, job security information, etc. are also assigned to this unique identification number 21 and thus to a specific product 2 or lot / batch.
- the first data record 31 describes the product 2 and the realized emissions 3 'and / or potential emissions 3 "associated with the production of the product 2.
- the data 31 comprises, in particular, if available, chemical information, toxicological and ecological data, indications of use, target textiles, For example, the provision or collection of this data is done by the supplier of a product 1 .3 itself, as it has detailed, confidential knowledge of its production processes and specific emission levels However, the results 314 of certification processes can serve as specific data 31 1 and are not required to be disclosed to the public as a trade secret.
- General data 31 2 such as MAK values, toxicological information, R / S rates, CAS numbers, poison classes, boiling points, flash points, etc., can also be taken from a corresponding general database 81 with publicly known information.
- one or more evaluation protocols 4 are defined with which at least one characteristic value 32 can be determined on the basis of the acquired data 31.
- This at least one characteristic value 32 is intended to quantify and / or qualify the realized emissions 3 'and / or potential emissions 3 "associated with the product 2. From the evaluation protocols 4, this is calculated for a specific product. 2 or intended for a particular product most appropriate evaluation protocol 4 determines.
- Confidential information and data 31 3 of a supplier 1 .3 are not taken over during the generation 51 1 of the data record 51, but are processed to the generic characteristic values 32.
- Certain substance-specific, public data 31 2, in particular information which is relevant for the selection of a suitable product, such as, for example, toxicological information, etc., can likewise be taken over into the second data set 51.
- the complete data record 31 is advantageously stored after the second data record 51 has been generated in a separate, internal database 82, which is not directly accessible to a user 53 of the external database 5
- a computer-implemented system 9 for detecting and quantifying emissions 3, 3 ', 3 "according to the invention comprises a plurality of modules 91, 92, 93 which act together:
- a detection module 91 serves to associate an identification code 21 with one from a specific source 22 originating product 2, in particular a specific product batch, and for collecting information on said product 2 and the realized and / or potential emissions 3, 3 ', 3 "associated with the production of said product 2 in a first data record 31.
- At least one characteristic 32 is generated, which quantifies and / or qualify the realized and / or potential emissions 3, 3 ', 3 "associated with the production of said product 2, whereby an evaluation protocol 4 is determined, and from first record 31 using the mentioned Be valuation protocol 4 of at least one characteristic 32 is generated.
- a second data set 51 is generated 51 1, comprising the identification code 21 and the at least one characteristic value 32, and the second data record 51 is stored in a database 5.
- the data set 51 advantageously contains further metadata 31 7 for the evaluation protocol 4 used and / or the first data sets 31 and / or the source 22 of the product 2 used for determining the at least one characteristic value 32.
- such metadata 31 7 may include a second identification code 41 assigned to the evaluation protocol 4 used, a third identification code 31 6 assigned to the type of determination of the first data record 31, a fourth identification code 221 for the source 22 of the product 2, for example the supplier or Manufacturer, etc. included.
- the data set 51 of the first product 2 with the data sets 51 .1, 51 is used for a first product 2, for the production of which one or more further products 2.1, 2.2,... Detected in the database 5 are used , 2, ... of the previous products 2.1, 2.2, ... concatenated.
- FIG. 3 schematically shows such a data record Chain.
- a weighting factor 52 is assigned.
- the characteristic values 32.1, 32.2, 32.3,... Of further data sets 51 .1, 51 .2, 51 linked to this are in a further particularly preferred variant. 3, ... used.
- Such a concatenation of the data records has the advantage that via this record chain, or this data set network, entire parts of a production chain can be recorded, quantified and qualified, and not just individual intermediate steps.
- a data record 51 of a product 2 can thus take account of the entire complex production chain in a reproducible manner. In this way, a much more comprehensive assessment and control is possible than, for example, with conventional certification methods.
- risk profiles 6 are determined for specific applications. For one particular data set 51, one or more risk characteristics 61 are then determined on the basis of the determined risk profile 6.
- the emission paths and potential hazards are different than in finishing processes using screen printing or other coating techniques. Depending on the processing technique, different emissions may result for the same chemical compound.
- These application-specific properties of a product 2 can thus be simulated via a suitable risk profile 6, and 61 1 risk characteristics 61 corresponding to the data set 51 can be assigned.
- Another example is the various uses of textile products, and the associated potential hazards of the wearer. For example, in infants and in direct contact with the skin ("skin contact", "next to skin”), the risk of contaminant incorporation through the skin is much greater than with clothing without direct skin contact. In industrial and technical textiles (“technical textile”), in turn, the risk potential or the potential emission is even lower.
- Risk profiles 6 may also take into account or map different legal provisions, for example different legal limits or lists of prohibited substances.
- the existing data sets 51 in a database 5 can be filtered on the basis of desired values and search criteria, and / or a suitable exclusion criterion can be used. In this way, certain groups of data sets or products can be excluded from the outset, for example, for in principle unacceptable chemical compounds, or for very poor production conditions or emission levels, so that regardless of the specific choice of a product automatically a certain minimum standard on the entire recorded production chain results.
- the characteristic values 32 of a data record 51 are classified on the basis of a higher-order, second evaluation protocol 4 '.
- a rough classification of the products 2 into, for example, five (very bad, bad, enough, good, very good), three ("black list”: in principle not acceptable; "gray list”: tolerable under certain Conditions, "Blue List”: always acceptable), or even only two levels (acceptable / unacceptable).
- records 51 for products 2 having an unacceptable classification may be intercepted prior to entry into the database 5, or the corresponding records may be blocked for a user 53.
- the second evaluation protocol 4 ' is essentially a special form of risk profile.
- User-specific profiles 54 for the accessible datasets, classifications, evaluation protocols, risk profiles etc. can also be made available. For example, only records 51 that relate to semi-finished textile products and auxiliaries 2 can be activated for a user profile. Such a user profile is accordingly suitable for users in the textile industry, the semi-finished products such. Fabrics 2 finished. For example, for a different user profile, only records 51 for finished fabrics 2 may be enabled. Such a user profile is therefore suitable for textile manufacturers and brand owners who want to manufacture the textile end products and ensure the quality of the materials used. In another user profile, only the end products can be listed, which is useful, for example, for retail companies that want to check the quality of goods sold by them.
- a user 53 with a specific user profile 54 obtains access to a part of the general database 81, and information about the evaluation protocols 4 used and risk profiles 6.
- the first data record 31 for a product is generally not static, but may change, for example when the production processes change. It is also possible that assessment protocols 4 have to be adapted because of certain risk assessments, scientific knowledge or legal requirements. Thus, for example, a previously considered unproblematic compound can suddenly be classified as highly carcinogenic, and hence its use henceforth be unacceptable.
- the second data records 51 are newly generated, for the generation of which this first data record 31, this evaluation protocol 4 or risk profile 6 was used , The same applies analogously to changes in general and specific data that were used when creating a first data set 31.
- the data sets 51 which are directly or indirectly dependent on a newly generated second data record 51 via a concatenation are also preferably newly generated.
- a single change in a data record 31 can thus trigger a cascade of adjustments and reevaluations. In this way, changes can be continuously recorded, and also understood in complex production chains.
- an internal, first data record 31 and / or an external, second data record 51 is assigned a time stamp which contains the time of generation of the data record 31, 51, and which is preferably immutable.
- this process may be performed in a validation module 94.
- a record 31, 51 are uniquely assigned to a particular lot or batch of products 2.
- the combination of the identification code 21 with the time stamp, if appropriate together with the second data record 51, thus forms a one-time certificate of the product 2.
- a regular repetition of the ceneration of the internal 31 and / or external 51 data record can also be provided.
- One or more data sets 31, 51 with the associated time stamps can be combined into a specific product 2 with an identification code 21 to form a certificate.
- These combined multiple data sets 51 with different time stamps then essentially form a certificate for a specific product 2 over a certain period of time. It is also possible to implement a monitoring or alarm function with which at certain intervals a data set 51 is checked for validity. In this way, changes can be identified early on and, if necessary, measures taken.
- the generation 51 1, 61 1 of the first data sets 31 and / or second data sets 51 and / or the risk characteristics 61 is repeated at specific time intervals and / or due to an external trigger.
- the newly generated data sets 31, 51 or risk characteristics 61 can then be compared with the preceding values and evaluated differences can be evaluated.
- the illustrated inventive methods can be performed on a central computer system, or on a network of statically or temporarily interconnected computer systems.
- the various modules 91, 92, 93, 94 of a computer-implemented system 9 according to the invention can be implemented on a computer system or on a number of permanently or temporarily interconnected computer systems.
- the internal database 82 and the external database 5 may be operated on the same or separate computer systems and / or database management systems.
- client subsystems or web applications can be provided for access to the various databases 5, 82 and the execution of the various method steps, or the execution of individual or all method steps takes place on a central system.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4257208P | 2008-04-04 | 2008-04-04 | |
| CH5432008A CH702923B1 (de) | 2008-04-05 | 2008-04-05 | Erfassung und Quantifizierung von Emissionen bei der Herstellung von Textilprodukten. |
| PCT/EP2009/053104 WO2009121714A1 (fr) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-03-16 | Procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour réduire au minimum et quantifier les émissions dans la chaîne de fabrication de produits textiles |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2274714A1 true EP2274714A1 (fr) | 2011-01-19 |
Family
ID=40719983
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP09728003A Ceased EP2274714A1 (fr) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-03-16 | Procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour réduire au minimum et quantifier les émissions dans la chaîne de fabrication de produits textiles |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2274714A1 (fr) |
| CH (1) | CH702923B1 (fr) |
| TW (1) | TWI467405B (fr) |
| WO (1) | WO2009121714A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102022207795A1 (de) * | 2022-07-28 | 2024-02-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung und Verbesserung von Umweltindikatoren für eine Herstellung eines Produktes |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE10117095A1 (de) * | 2001-04-06 | 2002-10-10 | Rieter Ingolstadt Spinnerei | Austauschbare Maschinenkomponente einer Spinnereimaschine mit einer Identifikationskennzeichnung und System zur Qualitätssicherung |
| US7032816B2 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2006-04-25 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Communication between machines and feed-forward control in event-based product manufacturing |
| TWI303715B (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2008-12-01 | Taiwan Textile Res Inst | Method for continuously evaluating an amount of gas adsorbed on materials |
-
2008
- 2008-04-05 CH CH5432008A patent/CH702923B1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2009
- 2009-03-16 EP EP09728003A patent/EP2274714A1/fr not_active Ceased
- 2009-03-16 WO PCT/EP2009/053104 patent/WO2009121714A1/fr not_active Ceased
- 2009-03-24 TW TW98109447A patent/TWI467405B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| See references of WO2009121714A1 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CH702923B1 (de) | 2011-10-14 |
| WO2009121714A1 (fr) | 2009-10-08 |
| TWI467405B (zh) | 2015-01-01 |
| TW200945093A (en) | 2009-11-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE69029983T2 (de) | Leistungsverbesserungsgerät für auf Regeln beruhendes Expertensystem | |
| DE69711949T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Abschätzung der Wirkung und Leistung eines Programms | |
| DE112021005271T5 (de) | Verfahren zum Bestimmen des Kohlenstoff-Fußabdrucks eines Produkts in Produktionsprozessen einer Produktionsanlage | |
| DE112017006733T5 (de) | Fehlerfaktor-Schätzvorrichtung und Fehlerfaktor-Schätzverfahren | |
| DE102018111892A1 (de) | Betriebsüberwachungsvorrichtung und Steuerprogramm dafür | |
| EP1623287A1 (fr) | Conception d'outils et de processus pour technique de formage | |
| DE102013106600A1 (de) | Datenverarbeitungssystem | |
| DE102018200702A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Organisation von zu behandelnden Wäschestücken sowie System zur Organisation dieser Wäschestücke | |
| DE102022114579A1 (de) | Industrieanlage und Verfahren zum Anlagenbetrieb und -monitoring | |
| EP2274714A1 (fr) | Procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour réduire au minimum et quantifier les émissions dans la chaîne de fabrication de produits textiles | |
| Iyer et al. | Environmental health impact assessment of chrome composite leather-clad rollers used by Indian cotton roller ginning industries and design and development of eco-friendly alternatives | |
| DE102017005608A1 (de) | Numerische Steuerung und Variablen-Ermittlungsverfahren | |
| WO2018177526A1 (fr) | Analyse de robustesse sur des véhicules | |
| EP3320134B1 (fr) | Prévision de l'apparence d'une surface textile | |
| Kamerschen | The Determination of Profit Rates in" Oligopolistic Industries" | |
| Benvenuti et al. | Efficiency analysis in knitted fabric portfolio management using DEA | |
| EP1737587B1 (fr) | Procede de preparation de donnees de surface, procede et dispositif d'evaluation de qualite et de gestion de qualite d'un materiau en bande | |
| DE202020006160U1 (de) | System zum Erstellen von Prozessprotokollen | |
| EP4381359B1 (fr) | Installation industrielle et procédés d'exploitation et de surveillance de l'installation | |
| DE102021109399A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Identifizierung von Veränderungen an einer Maschinenanordnung | |
| DE102014112256A1 (de) | Computerimplementiertes Verfahren zur Erzeugung eines Steuergeräteprogrammcodes und diesbezügliche Meldungsverwaltungsumgebung | |
| Longard et al. | Analyzing Inter-Temporal Correlations Of KPIs For Cross-Value Stream Performance Management | |
| DE102020116178A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erkennen einer Amplifikationsphase in einer Amplifikation | |
| EP2810192A2 (fr) | Traitement d'une quantité de données | |
| Raddatz | Threat modeling in machine learning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20101026 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA RS |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 1146973 Country of ref document: HK |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20120208 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R003 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED |
|
| 18R | Application refused |
Effective date: 20130126 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: WD Ref document number: 1146973 Country of ref document: HK |