EP3191236A1 - Presse plieuse - Google Patents

Presse plieuse

Info

Publication number
EP3191236A1
EP3191236A1 EP15781851.9A EP15781851A EP3191236A1 EP 3191236 A1 EP3191236 A1 EP 3191236A1 EP 15781851 A EP15781851 A EP 15781851A EP 3191236 A1 EP3191236 A1 EP 3191236A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bending
force
workpiece
tool
sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP15781851.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3191236B1 (fr
Inventor
Thomas Denkmeier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Trumpf Maschinen Austria GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Trumpf Maschinen Austria GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Trumpf Maschinen Austria GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Trumpf Maschinen Austria GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP3191236A1 publication Critical patent/EP3191236A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3191236B1 publication Critical patent/EP3191236B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D—WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D5/00—Bending sheet metal along straight lines, e.g. to form simple curves
    • B21D5/02—Bending sheet metal along straight lines, e.g. to form simple curves on press brakes without making use of clamping means
    • B21D5/0209—Tools therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D—WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D5/00—Bending sheet metal along straight lines, e.g. to form simple curves
    • B21D5/004—Bending sheet metal along straight lines, e.g. to form simple curves with program control
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D—WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D5/00—Bending sheet metal along straight lines, e.g. to form simple curves
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
    • B23Q11/00—Accessories fitted to machine tools for keeping tools or parts of the machine in good working condition or for cooling work; Safety devices specially combined with or arranged in, or specially adapted for use in connection with, machine tools
    • B23Q11/04—Arrangements preventing overload of tools, e.g. restricting load
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B30—PRESSES
    • B30B—PRESSES IN GENERAL
    • B30B15/00—Details of, or accessories for, presses; Auxiliary measures in connection with pressing
    • B30B15/28—Arrangements for preventing distortion of, or damage to, presses or parts thereof
    • B30B15/281—Arrangements for preventing distortion of, or damage to, presses or parts thereof overload limiting devices

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a bending press according to the preamble of claim 1 and a method for bending a workpiece with a bending press.
  • JPH05185300A discloses a machine tool having a super-magnetostrictive material surrounded by a coil between the pressing head and the punch.
  • the magnetic resistance changes with pressure, so that by measuring the current variation through the coil, the working pressure can be determined.
  • JPH10249599A discloses a press in which an overload of the workpiece by means of a pressure detector is to be prevented. If a predetermined value is exceeded, the tool movement is reversed.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a bending press and a bending method which allow optimized control of the bending operation.
  • the type and arrangement of the sensor should on the one hand allow the most detailed conclusions about the bending process, on the other hand allow a space-saving and simple construction.
  • the bending press should provide information about various aspects of the bending process.
  • the construction of the bending press should be simple and inexpensive.
  • the invention is intended to ensure the determination of reliable and reproducible information about the bending process, preferably independent of the type of workpiece.
  • a bending press in particular a bending or press bending press, of the type mentioned above in that the at least one sensor is a force or pressure sensor, which preferably cooperates with one of the tool holders, and in that the control device comprises a data processing device which to set up is to determine from the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor at least one property of the workpiece and / or caused by the bending deformation of the bending press.
  • the invention is based on the recognition that from the sensor data of a force or pressure sensor, which preferably cooperates with the tool holder, concrete information regarding the workpiece and the bending press can be determined in an accurate and reliable manner.
  • the data processing device may include an algorithm which generates at least one output variable as input variable as a function of the sensor data.
  • the output may, for example, the current bending angle of the workpiece, the thickness of the workpiece, the extent of deformation of the bending press during the bending process, in particular the deflection or (stator) widening.
  • Additional (constant or variable) parameters may be used in the computation of the workpiece properties of the algorithm, such as those shown in FIG. the bowing settings of the bending press, the type of tools, etc.
  • at least one calibration process is performed to determine the data sets relating to the parameters, in particular to compensate for the tolerances (tool shape, tool height, etc.).
  • the bending angle of the workpiece is preferably calculated by neural networks.
  • the crowning is implemented on bending machines specifically to compensate for the deformations of the table and the press beam. It produces a curvature directed in the opposite direction to the platform (or table) deflection. This crowning device is intended to ensure a continuous bending angle course along the entire workpiece.
  • the pressing force also causes deformation of the bending press itself.
  • frame parts may expand, i. a distance between frame parts can be larger, while elsewhere there is a deflection.
  • the output of the algorithm may now be e.g. the distance and / or an angle value that characterizes the deformation of the bending press.
  • the work piece property (s) and / or deformation of the bending press determined according to the invention can be used for optimized control of the bending process.
  • the constant monitoring of the current bending angle of the workpiece during the bending process are used to control the introduction of force into the workpiece as a function of the bending angle in time and locally.
  • a predetermined bending angle of the workpiece (in the relaxed, ie unloaded state) can be achieved precisely if the current bending angle (in the loaded state) is constantly monitored.
  • the workpiece in the bending press is first bent by a higher bending angle than finally desired.
  • the control can therefore be so accurate because the inventive determination of different parameters takes place accurately and reliably.
  • the tool holder is preferably a tool clamping, in which the tool is clamped (preferably between two clamping jaws or clamping strips) and thereby held in position.
  • the arrangement of the sensor, in particular between horrklem- tool and this tool is particularly advantageous because the entire composite of tool clamping and tool holds together immovable, whereby the sensor is reliably fixed or constrained in a predetermined position.
  • the at least one property of the workpiece in a preferred embodiment is the bending angle caused by the bending process.
  • the sensor is thus part of a (bending) angle sensor.
  • the thickness of the workpiece can be determined.
  • the bending process can be optimally adapted to the workpiece to be machined without the operator of the bending press having to communicate the workpiece properties.
  • Strain gauges piezoresistive strain sensors, capacitive sensors, piezoelectric (pressure) sensors, (fiber) optical sensors, magnetoelastic sensors, force measuring foils, (DLC) thin-film sensors, etc. come into question as force or pressure sensors.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the force or pressure sensor on the tool holder or within the tool holder or between the tool holder and held by the tool holder tool or between see the tool holder and the tool holder bearing platform is arranged.
  • the force or pressure sensor on the tool holder or within the tool holder or between the tool holder and held by the tool holder tool or between see the tool holder and the tool holder bearing platform is arranged.
  • Tool is hardly replaced, so that the sensor does not have to be constantly (with) removed or replaced by another sensor. Constant setup with the sensor is therefore not required.
  • the arrangement of the sensor in the tool itself is thereby avoided, which in particular because of the strength-specific tool weakening due to necessary processing.
  • the present solution is cheaper because the sensor function is not located in the tool itself and a measurement with the same sensor in all tools is possible.
  • the senor is a pressure sensor which is arranged in the main force flow of the bending press.
  • This arrangement provides particularly accurate and reproducible information about the workpiece or the deformation of the press brake.
  • the sensor is a piezoelectric sensor. This measure ensures precise measurement with high resolution and wide measuring range. Likewise, the high temporal resolution enables a virtually continuous measurement of the pressure.
  • a piezo sensor can be printed on metal including circuits. It is very inexpensive and above all very low in energy.
  • the piezoelectric sensor is formed flat, resulting in a space-saving solution, with the existing bending presses can be easily upgraded. It is preferred if the piezoelectric sensor is adhered to the workpiece holder, e.g. on a side of the workpiece holder facing the tool.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the sensor is seated in a recess or recess, in particular in a depression or recess of the work piece. convincing recording.
  • the sensor In the recess / recess, the sensor is not only protected from external influences (such as dirt, dust, moisture, etc.), but also locked in its position in the case of a shape-matching depression / recess with the sensor. In the latter case, the sensor is positively inserted into the recess or recess. This embodiment prevents a change in position of the sensor and thus measurement inaccuracies.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the sensor is surrounded by the tool holder and, at least when inserted into the tool holder tool is not visible from the outside.
  • the sensor is thereby optimally protected and safe from damage due to external influences (for example, when inserting the workpieces or when changing tools).
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the dimension of the at least one force or pressure sensor in a direction perpendicular to the pressing direction and perpendicular to the longitudinal extension of the tool holder, smaller, preferably at most half as large as the dimension of the tool holder in the same direction , This measure allows optimal integration of the sensor in or on the tool holder. Due to its dimensions, the sensor can also be integrated as centrally as possible into the main force flow, as a result of which the measurement accuracy can also be increased. When using multiple sensors and the spatial resolution is increased by such sized sensors.
  • the bending press comprises at least two, preferably a plurality of force or pressure sensors, which are arranged along the longitudinal extension of the tool holder (ie along the bending line or the so-called Z-axis) spaced from each other.
  • the bending angle of the workpiece can be determined location resolved.
  • a bending angle can be determined. Deviations from an ideal value can be detected, whereby on the one hand errors in the machine structure are detected, on the other hand immediate measures, such as a corresponding (Nach) control of a force distribution device for position-dependent introduction of force, are made.
  • a force distribution device will be described in more detail below.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the bending press comprises at least two, preferably a plurality of force or pressure sensors, in a direction (also called X-axis), transverse to the longitudinal extent of the tool holder (ie transverse to the bending line) and transverse to the pressing direction is arranged, spaced from each other.
  • a direction also called X-axis
  • the sensor data can be used both as an input variable (of the algorithm) for calculating the deformation of the bending press, as well as for the determination or correction of the bending angle determined, for example, only with the sensor data of a sensor.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the one platform is formed by a machine table and the other platform by a pressing beam and / or that one tool is formed by an upper tool and the other tool by a lower tool, preferably a tool by a Die and the other tool is formed by a stamp.
  • the bending press is preferably a press for bending plate-shaped workpieces, in particular metal sheets.
  • a method for bending a workpiece with a press brake comprising the steps of: (a) performing a bending operation by relative to each other to move the tools; (b) measuring the force and / or pressure applied by the bending operation with the force or pressure sensor; and (c) determining at least one property of the workpiece and / or the deformation of the bending press caused by the bending process from the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor.
  • the invention makes use of the knowledge that concrete information about the workpiece or the bending press can be determined precisely and reliably from the sensor data. This information can be used to control the press according to this information.
  • a property of the workpiece determined in step (c) is the bending angle of the workpiece caused by the bending process.
  • a property of the workpiece determined in step (c) is the thickness of the workpiece.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the measurement of the force or the pressure with the force or pressure sensor throughout the bending process is carried out continuously. In this case, a continuous measurement or an intermittent measurement (i.e., at predetermined time intervals) may take place. The monitoring of the entire bending process and possibly (Nach) control of the bending process as a function of the determined variables leads to optimal bending results.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the implementation of the
  • Step (c) takes place by means of an algorithm which determines the at least one property of the workpiece and / or the deformation of the bending press depending on at least one input variable, wherein the algorithm preferably uses at least one stored data set corresponding to each value of the at least one property of the Workpiece and / or the deformation of the press adjusts an input variable or derived from the at least one input variable intermediate size.
  • the data records can be determined from test or calibration measurements and allow a fast assignment of the values.
  • the algorithm can also use multiple datasets that reflect multiple dependencies. Also, multi-dimensional records can be provided.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that, in addition to the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor, the algorithm uses the relative position of the tools relative to each other, in particular the insertion depth, as an input for determining the at least one property of the workpiece and / or the deformation of the bending press.
  • this enables an even more accurate and reliable determination of a work piece property or bending press deformation, on the other hand the determination of two different work piece properties, eg bending angle, thickness, material properties, etc.
  • the relative position of the tools to each other by a separate (ie independent of the force or pressure sensor) sensor or transmitter is determined. This can be in particular an optical, mechanical or inductive sensor or transmitter. He could also detect or monitor the position of the piston in the press cylinder (which acts on the platform) or the extension of the piston rod.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that in step (c) the bending angle is determined, which has the workpiece in the state loaded by the tools.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that in step (c) the bending angle is determined which the bent workpiece assumes in the relaxed state.
  • the bending angle is determined which the bent workpiece assumes in the relaxed state.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that, for determining the bending angle in the relaxed state of the bent workpiece, the relative position of the tools, in particular the immersion depth, is used in that position in which the force or pressure exerted by the tools on the workpiece goes to zero or at least one tool loses contact with the bent workpiece.
  • This method provides very accurate values and allows the reliable determination of whether a workpiece has actually been sufficiently bent, or still needs to be corrected.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the reaching of this position by means of the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor is detected. Since the steep pressure drop (to zero) can be registered very accurately with the sensor according to the invention, this method represents a reliable reference.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the bending press has at least two force or pressure sensors and that from the sensor data of at least two force or pressure sensors depending on a bending angle is determined. This allows us to obtain spatially resolved information already described above.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that the control of the bending operation in dependence of the determined property of the workpiece and / or deformation of the bending press takes place. This provides optimized bending results.
  • a preferred embodiment is characterized in that in a deviation of the determined bending angle of a desired value, the bending press takes action, in particular an output of the deviation and / or the determined bending angle at an output interface, in particular a display, or storing the deviation and / or the determined bending angle in a memory.
  • the bending press comprises at least two, preferably a plurality of force or pressure sensors, which are arranged spaced apart along the longitudinal extent of the tool holder, is characterized in that the bending press has a force distribution device for positionally variable force introduction along the bending line, in particular, a rolling device for selective introduction of force, and that the control of the force distribution device takes place as a function of the sensor data of distributed along the longitudinal extension of the tool holder force or pressure sensors.
  • a force distribution device for positionally variable introduction of force along the bending line makes it possible to vary the location of the introduction of force or the extent of the introduction of force at a specific position along the bending line.
  • An example of such a force distribution device would be a so-called rolling device.
  • rolling device is a more or less selective force application by means of a rolling movement of the upper platform (the press bar) along the lower platform (machine table).
  • This individual influencing takes place according to the present embodiment as a function of the workpiece properties determined from the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor (bending angle, thickness, material properties, etc.).
  • the bending process is thus optimized along the entire bending line.
  • An aspect of the invention also relates to a method for bending a workpiece with a bending press, characterized by the steps of: (a) performing a bending operation by relative to each other to move two tools; (b) measuring the on
  • Tool and / or force applied to a tool holding tool holder force and / or pressure before, during and / or after the bending process with a force or pressure sensor ; (d) evaluating the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor in view of an undesired collision of a tool or a tool holder with a wrongly inserted tool, an object or a person; and (e) stopping and / or reversing the tool movement and / or outputting a preferably visual and / or audible warning signal.
  • This aspect of the invention relates to the use of the pressure or force sensor as collision detection.
  • the safety of a bending press is thereby effectively increased and prevents damage.
  • a separate sensor is not required because the force or pressure sensor, in particular a pressure sensor in the main force flow of the bending press, can be used for these purposes.
  • Piezosensors are particularly suitable for this purpose, as their high resolution, high dynamic range and high sensitivity allow reliable collision monitoring.
  • this method can be used to detect a collision of the tools if, for example, one of the tools for the bending process is inserted incorrectly or if it is incorrectly executed at all. was chosen. Collisions caused by incorrect input, eg calling a wrong control program, can also be detected.
  • the invention also relates to a computer program which carries out a method according to the invention when it runs in a control device of a bending press according to the invention.
  • the invention relates to a computer program product with program code, which is stored on a machine-readable carrier and comprises the above-mentioned computer program.
  • Fig. 12 deformation of a bending press.
  • a bending press 1 for bending a workpiece 2 comprising two platforms 3 which are movable relative to one another and each carrying a tool holder 4 holding a tool 5.
  • the tool holder 4 can also be constructed in several parts, in particular if it forms a tool clamping, and have two clamping jaws or bars for fixing the tool 5.
  • one (lower) platform 3 is formed by a machine table and the other (upper) platform 3 by a press beam.
  • the tools 5 are formed by an upper tool, here in the form of a punch, and a lower tool, here in the form of a die. The tools 5 are moved relative to each other along the pressing direction 10, wherein the lower tool 5 usually remains stationary.
  • the tools 5 and the corresponding tool holders 4 have elongated shape, whereby a (perpendicular to the image plane of Fig. 1 extending) bending line 16 of the workpiece 2 is defined.
  • a bending angle ß of the workpiece 2 is set.
  • the bending press 1 has a force or pressure sensor 6 which cooperates with one of the tool holders 4 (in FIG. 1 with the upper tool holder).
  • the sensor 6 is connected to a control device 7 of the bending press 1 (FIG. 7).
  • the control device 7 comprises a data processing device 8, which is set up to determine from the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6 at least one property of the workpiece 2 and / or the deformation of the bending press 1 caused by the bending process.
  • the underlying algorithm utilizes previously known dependencies to be determined in calibration processes (FIGS. 8 to 10).
  • the at least one property of the workpiece 2 to be determined may be e.g. be caused by the bending process bending angle ß and / or the thickness of the workpiece 2 be.
  • the deformation of the bending press 1 in particular deflection and / or stator widening, as e.g. is indicated in Fig. 12, can be determined from the sensor data.
  • This purpose is served in particular by a data record which depicts the dependencies of these variables (change in distance, sag angle) on the applied force.
  • the sensor 6 is arranged between the (upper) tool holder 4 and the tool 5 held by the tool holder 4.
  • a force or pressure sensor could interact with the lower tool holder 4.
  • the force or pressure sensor 6 can also be arranged between the tool holder 4 and the platform 3 supporting the tool holder 4, as shown by way of example in FIG. 2.
  • an arrangement within the tool holder 4 (FIG. 3) is possible.
  • the senor 6 is attached to the tool holder 4, e.g. in the form of a strain gauge, is attached.
  • FIG 4 shows an embodiment of a planar sensor 6 which is arranged, preferably glued, between the tool holder of the tool holder 4 and the tool 5.
  • the senor 6 is preferably a pressure sensor, which is arranged in the main force flow of the bending press 1.
  • a piezoelectric sensor is particularly preferred because of its resolution, dynamics and sensitivity.
  • a piezoelectric sensor requires little energy.
  • FIGS. 1, 2 and 4 show that the force or pressure sensor 6 is seated in a recess 9 or recess of the tool holder 4.
  • the sensor 6 is surrounded by the tool holder 4 and at least not visible in the tool holder 4 inserted tool 5 from the outside.
  • the dimension of the at least one force or pressure sensor 6 in a direction which is perpendicular to the pressing direction 10 and perpendicular to the longitudinal extension of the tool holder 4 is smaller here, preferably at most half as large as the dimension of the tool holder 4 in the same direction.
  • the bending press 1 comprises a plurality of force or pressure sensors 6 which are distributed along the longitudinal extension of the tool holder 4 or spaced from each other. This enables a spatially resolved determination, in particular the bending angle of the workpiece 2.
  • the bending press 1 comprises at least two, preferably several Force or pressure sensors 6, which are arranged in a direction which is transverse to the longitudinal extension of the tool holder 4 and transverse to the pressing direction 10, spaced from each other.
  • a spatial resolution can be achieved transversely or perpendicular to the bending line 16.
  • the method steps include: (a) performing a bending operation by relative to each other to move the tools 5; (b) measuring the force and / or pressure applied by the bending operation with the force or pressure sensor 6; and (c) determining at least one property of the workpiece 2 and / or the deformation of the bending press 1 caused by the bending operation from the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6.
  • the property of the workpiece 2 determined in step (c) can be the bending angle ⁇ of the workpiece 2 caused by the bending process.
  • a determination of the thickness of the workpiece 2 would also be possible because the required pressure application depends on the thickness of the workpiece 2.
  • the measurement of the force or the pressure with the force or pressure sensor 6 can take place throughout the entire bending process.
  • FIG. 7 shows in a schematic representation that the implementation of step (c) can take place by means of an algorithm 11 which determines the at least one property of the workpiece 2 and / or the deformation of the bending press 1 as a function of at least one input variable.
  • the algorithm 11 preferably uses at least one stored data set 12 which assigns to each value of the at least one property of the workpiece 2 and / or the deformation of the bending press 1 an input variable or an intermediate variable derived from the at least one input variable.
  • the algorithm runs in a data processing device 8 of the control device 7 of the bending press.
  • the output variables and / or output commands are transmitted to the control program 17.
  • the control device 7 is connected to the drive (s) 19 of the bending press and controls them.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 shows, for example, a dependence of the immersion depth L on the force F or the pressure P
  • FIG. 9 shows a dependence of the bending angle ⁇ on the immersion depth L.
  • the immersion depth L is also measured in the three-dimensional diagram of FIG. 10 and made available to the algorithm in addition to the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6 as an input variable.
  • the bending angle ⁇ can be determined here without knowing the workpiece thickness. With corresponding data sets that depict the dependency of the workpiece thickness on force and immersion depth, the workpiece thickness can also be determined.
  • the algorithm 11 in addition to the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6, the relative position of the tools 5 to each other, in particular the immersion depth, as an input to determine the at least one property of the workpiece 2 and / or the deformation of the bending press 1 is preferred ,
  • the relative position of the tools 5 can be determined with a separate sensor or transducer 19 (FIG. 7).
  • step (c) the bending angle ⁇ which the workpiece 2 has in the state loaded by the tools 5 can be determined.
  • the bending angle is determined which the bent workpiece 2 assumes or will assume in the relaxed state.
  • the relative position of the tools 5, in particular the immersion depth is used in that position in which the force exerted by the tools 5 on the workpiece 2 force or pressure goes to zero or at least one tool 2 loses contact with the bent workpiece 2.
  • the achievement of this position can preferably be determined by means of the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6.
  • One possible procedure would be to first determine bending and the instantaneous bending angle (ie in loaded condition); then move back with the tool until the contact with the workpiece stops (is detected by the sensor 6). In this position the immersion depth is determined, from which then the return spring angle or the bending angle in the unloaded state can be closed.
  • the bending press 1 can have at least two force or pressure sensors 6 (FIGS. 5 and 6). From the respective sensor data of the at least two force or pressure sensors 6 can each be determined a bending angle.
  • the bending process can now be controlled as a function of the determined property of the workpiece 2 and / or deformation of the bending press 1.
  • the bending press 1 can take an action, in particular an output of the deviation and / or the determined bending angle at an output interface 13, in particular a display (FIG. 7), or storing the deviation and / or the determined bending angle in a memory 14 (Fig. 7).
  • FIG. 6 in which the bending press 1 has several sensors distributed along the bending line, can be expanded as follows:
  • the bending press 1 can be equipped with a force distribution device 15 for positionally variable force introduction along the bending line 16.
  • the force distribution device 15 is then controlled as a function of the sensor data of the force or pressure sensors 6 distributed along the longitudinal extent of the tool holder 4.
  • a force distribution device for positionally variable introduction of force along the bending line enables the location of the introduction of force or the extent of force introduction to one specific position along the bending line to vary. As a result, an exactly constant bending angle can be achieved along the entire bending line. Local deviations from a predetermined desired bending angle can thus be easily eliminated during the bending process.
  • FIG. 11 shows an example of a force distributing device 15 in the form of a rolling device for selective application of force. Here is a more or less punctual
  • a preferred aspect of the invention relates to a method of bending a workpiece with a bending press 1, comprising the steps of: (a) performing a bending operation by relative to each other to move two tools 5; (b) measuring the force and / or pressure acting on a tool 5 and / or on a tool holder 4 holding the tool 5 before, during and / or after the bending operation with at least one force or pressure sensor 6; (d) evaluating the sensor data of the force or pressure sensor 6 in view of an undesired collision of a tool 5 or a tool holder 4 with a wrongly inserted tool 5, an object or a person; and (e) stopping and / or reversing the tool movement and / or outputting a preferably visual and / or audible warning signal.
  • This extends the bending press with a reliable safety system.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Bending Of Plates, Rods, And Pipes (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une presse plieuse (1), destinée à plier une pièce (2), qui comprend deux plates-formes (3), qui sont mobiles l'une par rapport à l'autre et qui supportent chacune un porte-outil (4) qui porte un outil (5), un dispositif de commande (7) et un capteur (6) relié au dispositif de commande (7). L'invention est caractérisée en ce que le ou les capteurs (6) sont un ou des capteurs de force ou de pression qui coopèrent avec l'un des porte-outils (4) et en ce que le moyen de commande (7) comporte un moyen de traitement de données (8) qui est adapté pour déterminer à partir des données du ou des capteur de force ou de pression (6) une ou plusieurs propriété de la pièce (2) et/ou la déformation la presse plieuse (1) qui est provoquée par le processus de pliage.
EP15781851.9A 2014-09-11 2015-09-09 Presse plieuse et procédé de pliage d'une pièce à l'aide de la presse plieuse Active EP3191236B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ATA50632/2014A AT515672B1 (de) 2014-09-11 2014-09-11 Biegepresse
PCT/AT2015/050223 WO2016037208A1 (fr) 2014-09-11 2015-09-09 Presse plieuse

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3191236A1 true EP3191236A1 (fr) 2017-07-19
EP3191236B1 EP3191236B1 (fr) 2023-06-28

Family

ID=54337061

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15781851.9A Active EP3191236B1 (fr) 2014-09-11 2015-09-09 Presse plieuse et procédé de pliage d'une pièce à l'aide de la presse plieuse

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3191236B1 (fr)
AT (1) AT515672B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016037208A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106563715B (zh) * 2016-11-03 2018-12-04 山东大学 板料电致塑性多功能v形弯曲模具和系统
IT201900014481A1 (it) * 2019-08-09 2021-02-09 Rolleri S P A Utensile per una pressa piegatrice e apparato per monitorare la sollecitazione esercitata da detto utensile
CN117584526B (zh) * 2024-01-18 2024-04-26 维亘精密机械(苏州)有限公司 一种冲压模具以及回弹补偿方法
AT528699A1 (de) * 2024-09-30 2026-04-15 Trumpf Werkzeugmaschinen Se Co Kg Verfahren zur Erkennung und Vermeidung von Gefahrensituationen für eine Bedienperson beim Bearbeiten eines Werkstücks
CN120189900B (zh) * 2025-05-26 2025-09-12 陕西新天地固体废物综合处置有限公司 一种热镀锌废酸处理用混合反应釜

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0192989A (ja) * 1987-10-02 1989-04-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 半導体メモリ装置
JPH01254042A (ja) * 1988-04-01 1989-10-11 Toshiba Corp 通信端末装置
JP3461843B2 (ja) * 1991-06-05 2003-10-27 株式会社アマダ 油圧式ベンディングマシンの板厚測定装置
JP2987006B2 (ja) * 1992-05-15 1999-12-06 松下電工株式会社 塗装鋼板の曲げ加工方法
JPH06154874A (ja) * 1992-11-19 1994-06-03 Amada Co Ltd プレスブレ―キのボトミング加工方法および装置
DE29713318U1 (de) * 1997-07-26 1997-09-25 Paul Weinbrenner Maschinenbau GmbH + Co KG, 71263 Weil der Stadt Winkelmeßeinrichtung für Biegemaschinen
NL1014117C2 (nl) * 2000-01-19 2001-07-20 Cornelis Hendricus Liet Inrichting voor het meten van de buighoek van een werkstuk.
JP2002086215A (ja) * 2000-09-13 2002-03-26 Amada Co Ltd 曲げ加工装置
AT411022B (de) * 2002-02-27 2003-09-25 Juricek Christian Dipl Ing Verfahren zur reduktion der biegewinkelfehler beim gesenkbiegen

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2016037208A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3191236B1 (fr) 2023-06-28
AT515672B1 (de) 2015-11-15
AT515672A4 (de) 2015-11-15
WO2016037208A1 (fr) 2016-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1961502B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés au pliage de pièces
EP3240994B1 (fr) Détection d'écarts géométriques d'une commande de trajectoire dans un appareil de mesure de coordonnées ou dans une machine-outil
DE69306640T2 (de) Methode und Apparat zur Haltekraftmessung an einem Druckring einer Presse
AT515672B1 (de) Biegepresse
EP3524421B1 (fr) Presse et son procédé de fonctionnement
EP2408590B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour installer une machine
AT505743A1 (de) Verfahren zur festlegung eines einstellparameterwerts einer biegepresse
AT516761B1 (de) Verfahren und Anlage für das Richten von metallischen Teilen
AT521529B1 (de) Biegevorrichtung und Verfahren zur Ermittlung zumindest eines Materialparameters bzw. Bearbeitungsparameters für eine Werkstückbearbeitungsvorrichtung
WO2002013986A1 (fr) Procede permettant de faire fonctionner une presse a cintrer et presse a cintrer, notamment presse plieuse
DE102012013371A1 (de) Messvorrichtung für ein Stößelkissen einer Presse
EP2977196B1 (fr) Procede de moulage a compensation d'erreurs de positionnement lors du processus de moulage et presse destinee a executer un tel procede
DE102021209714A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Walzen von metallischem Band
DE102018113880A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Presse
AT411022B (de) Verfahren zur reduktion der biegewinkelfehler beim gesenkbiegen
DE112017004487T5 (de) Maschine und Verfahren zum Fluidstrahlschneiden
EP3960318A1 (fr) Presse de nivellement permettant de niveler une pièce et procédé de nivellement d'une pièce
DE102015114921A1 (de) Presspassvorrichtung
DE102014012344A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bearbeitung eines Werkstücks mit einer Werkzeugmaschine
DE102013016450B4 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Soll-Stellmaßes zum Fügen einer Baugruppe
DE102022100935A1 (de) Verfahren und Stanzmaschine zum Ermitteln einer Stempelaufsetzposition eines Stempels der Stanzmaschine
EP2329895A2 (fr) Presse et outil doté d'un dispositif de retenue pour une pièce usinée
DE102020213239A1 (de) Verfahren zur automatischen Kalibrierung von Vertikalrollen eines Vertikalwalzgerüsts sowie Kalibrieranordnung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE102014117244A1 (de) Koordinatenmessgerät und Verfahren zur Kompensation großer Werkstückmassen
DE102020211616B4 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Bewertung einer Messvorschrift zur Vermessung von Werkstücken

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170410

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210507

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230127

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1582244

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502015016463

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230928

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231030

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231028

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231030

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231031

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502015016463

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230909

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230930

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230928

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230909

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20240402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230928

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230909

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230928

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1582244

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20240909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150909

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250917

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230628