EP3519625B1 - Papier ingraissable - Google Patents

Papier ingraissable Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3519625B1
EP3519625B1 EP17790861.3A EP17790861A EP3519625B1 EP 3519625 B1 EP3519625 B1 EP 3519625B1 EP 17790861 A EP17790861 A EP 17790861A EP 3519625 B1 EP3519625 B1 EP 3519625B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
starch
paper
solid substrate
based solid
fluorochemical
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17790861.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3519625A1 (fr
Inventor
Didier Andre Pierre DELNOYE
John Beugeling
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cooperative Avebe UA
Original Assignee
Cooperative Avebe UA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cooperative Avebe UA filed Critical Cooperative Avebe UA
Publication of EP3519625A1 publication Critical patent/EP3519625A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3519625B1 publication Critical patent/EP3519625B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H19/00—Coated paper; Coating material
    • D21H19/36—Coatings with pigments
    • D21H19/44—Coatings with pigments characterised by the other ingredients, e.g. the binder or dispersing agent
    • D21H19/54—Starch
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/03—Non-macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/05—Non-macromolecular organic compounds containing elements other than carbon and hydrogen only
    • D21H17/11—Halides
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21—Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24—Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28—Starch

Definitions

  • the invention is in the field of paper-pulp based solid substrates with grease resistance, most notably grease-resistant paper and cardboard.
  • the treatment of paper and board with fluorinated compounds to achieve oil and grease resistance is well known in the art.
  • the grease resistance is based on a reduction of the surface energy of the substrate by fluorochemical agents.
  • Fluorochemical agents are generally applied via surface treatment to a cellulosic substrate.
  • the use of starches as carrier in the surface treatment is well known in the prior art.
  • a highly acid thinned hydroxyethylated starch is used.
  • US 2007/0020462 mentions the use of many starch types including but not limited to oxidized, ethylated, cationic or pearl starch.
  • amylopectin-starches as carrier for fluorochemicals.
  • the ratio between starch and fluorochemical in known papers and compositions for improving oil- and grease resistance is between 10 and 20.
  • Oil and grease resistance is generally required at the surface of paper or board. Penetration of the fluorochemical into the paper or board leads to a reduced performance and/or increased consumption of the fluorochemical. As fluorochemicals contribute significantly to the cost of the final paper, it is important to optimize or minimize the quantity used. Moreover, from an environmental point of view it also important to minimize the overall fluorochemical consumption. Several attempts have been made to improve the efficacy of the fluorochemical treatment to improve oil- and grease resistance of paper.
  • US 2011/0189395 describes a process that comprises a printing process to apply a (per)fluoropolyether to at least part of a substrate with the objective to reduce the total amount of fluoro-containing additives.
  • Disadvantage of this invention is that it requires the installation of expensive specialized equipment.
  • EP 2 492 395 B1 describes a composition for improving the performance of fluorochemical compounds such as (per)fluoropolyethers comprising a fluorocarbon resin, a guar gum and an inorganic phosphate salt, which composition may comprise starch.
  • fluorochemical compounds such as (per)fluoropolyethers comprising a fluorocarbon resin, a guar gum and an inorganic phosphate salt, which composition may comprise starch.
  • Disadvantage of this composition is the price and availability of guar gum, and the applied ratio between starch and fluorochemical is not higher than 6.3, and the starch used is not amylopectin-rich starch.
  • compositions and methods to improve the efficiency of fluorochemical compounds to improve oil- and grease resistance of paper and cardboard are furthermore preferred to use starch-based carriers which comply with international guidelines and regulations for food contact paper and cardboard and which can be applied onto a fibrous web using surface treatment devices. Specifically, this means there is a need for a starch based carrier which is not stabilized by esterification or etherification and which improves the performance of a fluorochemical to impart oil and grease resistance of a surface treatment composition.
  • the present invention provides a paper-pulp based solid substrate, comprising a fluorochemical and a degraded root or tuber starch or a degraded root or tuber starch blend, which degraded root or tuber starch or degraded root or tuber starch blend comprises 90-100 wt.%, based on the total weight of the starch or starch blend, of amylopectin, and which root or tuber starch or root or tuber starch blend is characterized by a molecular weight of 0.5 - 20 • 10 6 Da, and a viscosity, determined on a 15 wt.% aqueous solution by a Brookfield LVF viscometer at 60 rpm and at 50 °C, of 20 - 150 cP.
  • a paper-pulp based solid substrate in this context is a cellulosic material. Specifically, it is a solid material comprising a network of cellulosic fibers, which are intertwined to provide a degree of coherency.
  • the paper-pulp based solid substrate of the invention is paper or cardboard, preferably paper. Any type of paper-pulp based solid substrate can be treated as described herein, to obtain an oil and grease-resistant paper-pulp based solid substrate. How to obtain a paper-pulp based solid substrate is well-known in the art.
  • a paper-pulp based solid substrate of the invention comprises a fluorochemical.
  • Fluorochemicals are known in the art of providing oil- and grease resistant paper. Fluorochemicals are polymers or oligomers comprising CF 2 and/or CF 3 groups. Preferably, at least 50 wt.% of the molecular mass can be attributed to CF 2 and/or CF 3 -groups, more preferably at least 60 wt.%. Alternatively or additionally, 40-90 wt.% of the molecular mass of the fluorochemical is attributed to covalently bound fluorine (F) atoms. Such polymers are well-known and commercially available.
  • the molecular weight of the fluorochemical is between 200 and 20000 Da, preferably between 300 and 15000 Da.
  • the fluorochemical may be a cationic fluorochemical, an anionic fluorochemical or a neutral fluorochemical.
  • a cationic or an anionic fluorochemical is preferred, and most preferred is an anionic fluorochemical.
  • Anionic fluorochemicals are known in the art of providing oil- and grease resistant paper.
  • Anionic fluorochemicals are polymers or oligomers comprising CF 2 and/or CF 3 groups.
  • Preferably, at least 50 wt.% of the molecular mass can be attributed to CF 2 and/or CF 3 -groups, more preferably at least 60 wt.%.
  • 40-90 wt.% of the molecular mass of the anionic fluorochemical is attributed to covalently bound fluor (F) atoms.
  • Such polymers are well-known and commercially available.
  • anionic fluorochemical any type of anionic fluorochemical can be used.
  • fluorinated or perfluorinated carboxylic acids perfluoroacids
  • perfluorinated fatty acids are suitable fluorochemicals for use according to the invention.
  • anionic fluorochemicals can include fluorocarboxylic acids having an ether bond (perfluoro-ether acids).
  • the anionic fluorochemical comprises a phosphate, sulfate or carboxylate anionic group.
  • the molecular weight of the anionic fluorochemical is between 200 and 20000 Da, preferably between 300 and 15000 Da.
  • a preferred molecular weight is between 500 and 10000 Da.
  • the molecular weight is preferably between 350 and 8000 Da.
  • An example of a suitable anionic fluorochemical is the Solvera PFPE product line of Solvay, which are products based on a perfluoropolyether (PFPE) backbone that is functionalized in order to graft the material to the substrate being treated.
  • PFPE perfluoropolyether
  • One suitable, exemplary compound is Solvera PT 5045PG.
  • Cationic fluorochemicals are also known in the art of providing oil- and grease resistant paper. Any type of cationic fluorochemical can be used. Preferred is a cationic fluorochemical comprising a fluorinated polyether having a cationic group, such as a cationic perfluoro polyether. Also preferred are cationic fluorinated polyacrylates, preferably perfluorinated polyacrylates. Suitable polyacrylates have for instance also been described in WO 2009/000370 . In much preferred embodiments, the cationic fluorinated polyacrylate is Cartaguard KST, available from Archroma.
  • the cationic fluorochemical is the reaction product of a fluorinated (preferably perfluorinated) polyether having a cationic group with an organic polyfunctional isocyanate.
  • the cationic fluorochemical is a fluorochemical as defined in US 2014/0322543A1 , i.e. a fluorinated compound comprising the reaction product of at least two reactants A and B wherein reactant A is a compound of formula (I); R f -O-(CF(CF 3 )CF 2 O) m CF(CF 3 )-X-Y-Z (I) with
  • reactant B is a polyisocyanate with at least 3 isocyanate groups or a mixture of polyisocyanate compounds with more than 2 isocyanate groups per molecule on average, such as for example a mixture of a diisocyanate compound and a polyisocyanate compound with at least 3 isocyanate groups.
  • the polyisocyanate may be aliphatic or aromatic.
  • Examples include hexamethylenediisocyanate, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylenediisocyanate, 1,2-ethylenediisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, 1,3,6-hexamethylenetriisocyanate, cyclic trimer of hexamethylenediisocyanate, cyclic trimer of isophorondiisocyanate, 4,4'-methylenediphenylenediisocyanate, 4,6-di-(trifluoromethyl)-1,3-benzene diisocyanate, 2,4-toluenediisocyanate, 2,6-toluenediisocyanate, o-, m- and p-xylenediisocyanate, 4,4'-diisocyanatodiphenylether, 3,3'-dichloro-4,4'-diisocyanatodiphenylmethane, 4,5'
  • reactant B are isocyanates containing internal isocyanate-derived moieties such as biuret-containing tri-isocyanates, such as that available from Bayer as DESMODUR TM N-types.
  • reactant B are DESMODUR TM N100, DESMODUR TM N3200, DESMODUR TM N3300, DESMODUR TM N3400 and DESMODUR TM N3600.
  • one or more isocyanate-reactive co-reactants may also be present in the cationic fluorochemical of US2014/0322543A1 , such as a co-reactant of formula (III) (R f -O-(CF(CF 3 )CF 2 O) m CF(CF 3 )-X) n -Q (III) with
  • the molecular weight of the cationic fluorochemical for use in the present invention is between 200 and 20000 Da, preferably between 300 and 15000 Da.
  • the cationic fluorochemical is a cationic perfluoro polyether, such as for example Cartaguard KHI obtained from Archroma, or a cationic perfluoropolyacrylate, such as for example Cartaguard KST from Archroma.
  • the invention provides a paper-pulp based solid substrate, comprising a cationic fluorochemical and a degraded root or tuber starch or a degraded root or tuber starch blend as defined above, further comprising optionally an acid, preferably citric acid or acetic acid.
  • the fluorochemical can be applied to a single side of a paper-pulp based solid substrate, or to both sides.
  • the paper-pulp based solid substrate of the invention preferably comprises a quantity of fluorochemical of 0.01 - 0.5 g/m 2 per side of the paper-pulp based solid substrate, more preferably 0.015 - 0.3 g/m 2 per side, more preferably 0.02 - 0.2 g/m 2 per side, even more preferably 0.01 - 0.1 g/m 2 per side, even more preferably 0.015 - 0.05 g/m 2 per side.
  • the total loading of fluorochemical on the paper can be from 0.01 - 1 g/m 2 , preferably 0.015 - 0.6 g/m 2 , more preferably from 0.02 - 0.4 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.02 - 0.2 g/m 2 , even more preferably from 0.03 - 0.1 g/m 2 . It can be tested whether the fluorochemical is present on one or on two sides of the paper-pulp based solid substrate by electron spectroscopy chemical analysis, as is known in the art.
  • the quantity of fluorochemical on the paper-pulp based solid substrate is 0.5 - 5 kg/ton, preferably 0.8 - 4 kg/ton, more preferably 1 - 3 kg/ton.
  • One objective of the invention is to improve the performance of fluorochemicals by increasing the starch/fluorochemical ratio ("SF-ratio").
  • the SF-ratio is defined as the ratio of the quantity of starch per m 2 and the quantity of fluorochemical (per m 2 ).
  • the starch functions as a carrier for the fluorochemical.
  • the paper-pulp based solid substrate further comprises a degraded root or tuber starch or a degraded root or tuber starch blend, which degraded root or tuber starch or degraded root or tuber starch blend comprises 90-100 wt.%, based on the total weight of the starch or starch blend, of amylopectin.
  • the root or tuber starch (or starch blend) of the invention may be (a blend of starches of) of any root or tuber source.
  • a root starch is a starch derived from roots
  • a tuber starch is a starch derived from tuber.
  • Roots are the underground portion of a plant, which provide nutrients and support.
  • a tuber is a thickened part of the underground portion of a plant which provides storage of energy and nutrients, for example for a plant's survival during the winter months and/or for reproduction.
  • Root or tuber sources of starch are well known in the art, and such sources include the species of potato ( Solanum tuberosum or Irish potato), sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ) , cassava (also known as tapioca, Manihot esculenta, syn. M. u tilissima ) , yuca dulce ( M. palmata, syn. M. dulcis ) , yam ( Dioscorea spp ) , yautia ( Xanthosoma spp., including X .
  • potato Solanum tuberosum or Irish potato
  • sweet potato Ipomoea batatas
  • cassava also known as tapioca, Manihot esculenta, syn. M. u tilissima
  • yuca dulce M. palmata, syn. M. dulcis
  • yam Dioscorea spp
  • yautia Xanthosom
  • Root or tuber starches are distinguished from other starch types, such as cereal starches (including e.g. corn starch, wheat starch), and bean starches (e.g. pea starch, soybean starch).
  • root or tuber starch includes preferably starch of potato, sweet potato, cassava, yuca dulce, yam, yautia, taro, arracacha, arrawroot, chufa, sago palm, oca, ullucu, yam bean and topinambur.
  • the root or tuber starch is a starch of potato, sweet potato, cassava or yam, more preferably of potato, sweet potato or cassava, and most preferably the root or tuber starch is a potato starch (derived from Solanum tuberosum ) .
  • a blend may comprise starch of multiple root or tuber sources, or may be two different starch types of the same (root or tuber) source.
  • a starch blend of the invention may be a regular, non-waxy potato starch, blended with a waxy potato starch, so as to attain an overall amylopectin content as defined elsewhere.
  • root and tuber starch such as potato starch and tapioca starch
  • Potato starch has a much lower content of lipids and proteins than the cereal starches. This is true in particular for waxy potato starch, in comparison to waxy cereal starch. Problems regarding odor and foaming, which, because of the lipids and/or proteins, may occur when using cereal or waxy cereal starch products (native and modified), do not occur, or occur to a much lesser degree when using corresponding potato starch products.
  • root or tuber starch such as potato starch comprises chemically bound phosphate groups. As a result, potato starch products in a dissolved state have a distinct polyelectrolyte character.
  • the oxidized starch is a root or tuber starch (or a root or tuber starch blend, i.e. a blend of two or more root or tuber starches). It has been found that the presence of the lipids and proteins adversely affects the oxidation reaction, leading to by-products because of which the oxidized starch is not of sufficient quality. Furthermore, the presence of lipids and proteins leads to an unacceptably high AOX level, wherein the AOX level is defined as the amount of material that adsorbs to active carbon when the oxidized starch is brought into contact with said active carbon. The AOX level provides an indication of the amount of halogenic material, such as chlorine, in the oxidized starch.
  • Starch is essentially composed of two molecule types, amylose and amylopectin.
  • Amylose consists of unbranched or slightly branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of 1000 to 5000, depending on the starch type (average molecular weight approximately 0.18 - 0.9 • 10 6 Da).
  • Amylopectin consists of very large, highly branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of 1.000.000 or more (average molecular weight about 180 • 10 6 Da or more).
  • Natural, regular starch comprises about 70-85 wt.% of amylopectin and about 15-30 wt.% of amylose.
  • amylopectin-rich starch (“waxy” starch) is also known, which generally comprises more than 95 wt.%, preferably more than 98 wt.%, based on the weight of the starch, of amylopectin.
  • the root or tuber starch or root or tuber starch blend comprises 90-100 wt.%, based on the total weight of the starch, of amylopectin.
  • a root or tuber starch of the invention may thus be a waxy starch, having an amylopectin content of more than 95 wt.%, preferably more than 98 wt.%, based on the weight of the starch, of amylopectin.
  • a starch of the invention may also be a starch blend, comprising waxy starch with an amylopectin content of more than 95 wt.%, based on the weight of the starch, and regular starch with an amylopectin content of 70-85 wt.%, based on the weight of the starch. Blends of more than two types of starches are also possible.
  • the starch of the invention is a starch blend, the ratio between the waxy starch and the regular starch is chosen so as to achieve an (overall) amylopectin content of 90-100 wt.%, based on the total weight of the starch blend.
  • the weight ratio between the natural starch and the waxy starch may be between 3:1 and 1:3, preferably between 1:1 and 1:2.
  • the root or tuber starch or root or tuber starch blend has been degraded.
  • the starch types present in the blend may have been degraded separately, after which blending of the starch types results in the starch blend.
  • the starch blend may have undergone the degradation process already blended.
  • Suitable methods include oxidation, acid degradation and enzymatic degradation, which are all known in the art. Combinations of degradation methods may also be applied. It is preferred if the degraded starch has at least been oxidized. Oxidized starch is preferred. The advantage of using oxidized starch over using other types of degraded starches is presumed to lie in the increased presence of carbonyl groups, which impart special characteristics to the starch in the context of interaction with fluorochemical and/or paper-pulp based solid substrate.
  • the starch or starch blend has been degraded by oxidation.
  • the degraded starch or starch blend preferably comprises an oxidized starch.
  • the oxidation to obtain an oxidized starch for use in the present invention is carried out using hypochlorite as described in WO 00/006607 .
  • hypochlorite as described in WO 00/006607 .
  • the oxidation is carried out with an alkali metal hypochlorite as oxidizing agent.
  • sodium hypochlorite is used as an oxidizing agent.
  • Alkali metal hypochlorites are relatively cheap and have a relatively large oxidizing power, thus leading to a very efficient and fast oxidizing process.
  • the amount in which the oxidizing agent is added may vary between 0.001 and 0.4 moles of alkali metal hypochlorite per mole starch, preferably between 0.0025 and 0.15 moles of alkali metal hypochlorite per mole starch.
  • the skilled person will be aware that the alkali metal hypochlorite should be added to the starch in a controlled manner.
  • the oxidation of starch is performed at pH between 6 and 10, more preferably between 6.5 and 9.5, even more preferably between 7.5 and 9. It has been found that by working at a pH in these ranges particularly small amounts of oxidizing agent suffice in order to obtain an oxidized starch having excellent properties.
  • an acid or a base may be added to the reaction mixture.
  • suitable acids and bases may be chosen such that they have substantially no negative effect on the oxidation reaction or on the oxidized starch.
  • hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide is used.
  • the temperature at which the starch, in accordance with the invention, is treated with an oxidizing agent is preferably chosen between 20 and 50°C, more preferably between 25 and 40°C.
  • the oxidation reaction may be carried out as a suspension or solution reaction in water.
  • the reaction is carried out as a suspension reaction in water, as this leads to a granular oxidized starch.
  • the starch to be oxidized is suspended in water in an amount ranging between 0.5 and 1.5 kg of dry starch per liter water.
  • a catalyst or a combination of catalysts may be used in the oxidation reaction.
  • Suitable catalysts include bromide, cobalt, iron, manganese and copper salts.
  • the catalyst or catalysts will be applied in catalytic amounts, which will be no higher than 10 wt.%, with respect to the amount of alkali metal hypochlorite.
  • the reaction product of the above-described oxidation reaction is subjected to an alkaline treatment.
  • This treatment comprises keeping the product for at least 15 minutes at a temperature of 20-50°C and a pH higher than 10.
  • the alkaline treatment has a beneficial effect on the properties, especially the viscosity stability, of the oxidized starch.
  • An oxidized starch according to the invention may be stored at increased temperatures, e.g. 80°C, for prolonged periods of time without substantially any change in the viscosity of the product being observed.
  • the alkaline treatment lasts at least 30, more preferably at least 60 minutes. Although there is no critical upper limit for the duration of the alkaline treatment, it will usually not be carried out for more than 6 hours in order to prevent that too much of the desired product dissolves in the water.
  • the pH at which the alkaline treatment is carried out is preferably higher than 10.5. Further preferred is that the pH is kept below 12. It has been found that according to these preferred embodiments, an even higher viscosity stability may be achieved.
  • the oxidation is carried out using hydrogen peroxide as described in US 5,833,755 .
  • the amount of hydrogen peroxide employed is preferably from about 0.0075 to 15.0 wt.%, more preferably about 0.01 to 2.0 wt.%, and even more preferably about 0.25 to 1.5 wt.% anhydrous hydrogen peroxide on dry substance of the starch.
  • the hydrogen peroxide will normally be used in the form of an aqueous solution, as commonly supplied in commerce.
  • the oxidation reaction is performed in a solution, dispersion or suspension of the starch in water, to which the hydrogen peroxide, or an aqueous solution thereof, is added.
  • the hydrogen peroxide is added batchwise or dropwise.
  • Suitable concentrations of the starch in said solution, dispersion or suspension lie between 10 and 50, preferably between 20 and 40 wt.%, based on the weight of the solution, dispersion or suspension.
  • the pH during the oxidation reaction is between pH 10 and 12.5, preferably between 11 and 12. When the desired degree of oxidation is achieved, the pH will be adjusted to a level of pH 5-6.
  • the temperature during the oxidation reaction in a suspension will preferably be below 60°C, more preferably between 20 and 50°C. When the reaction is carried out in a solution or dispersion, the temperature will usually be chosen between 60 and 200°C, preferably between 100 and 160°C. In order to carry out the reaction at a temperature higher than 100°C, use is preferably made of a jet cooker.
  • the oxidation of the specific starch described above is preferably performed in the presence of a catalyst.
  • the catalyst preferably comprises divalent copper ions or a manganese complex.
  • the use of a manganese complex as catalyst is particularly preferred.
  • the catalyst comprises divalent copper ions
  • it will preferably be used in the form of a salt.
  • any copper(II)-salt which is soluble in water may be used.
  • the anion of the salt may be chosen from the group of chloride, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, acetate, bromide and combinations thereof.
  • the quantity of copper used ranges from about 5 ppb to about 5000 ppb, more preferably from about 100 to about 1000 ppb, on dry substance of starch.
  • the quantity of copper may be lower (e.g. between 5 and 1000 ppb) than when the reaction is performed in a suspension.
  • the action of the divalent copper ions is enhanced by calcium, vanadium, manganese, iron and/or tungsten ions.
  • the counterions for these ions may be of the same type as those of the copper catalyst.
  • These additional salts will preferably be used in an amount between about 100 and about 2000 ppm, on dry substance of starch.
  • the oxidation may also be carried out as disclosed in US 2012/0070554 .
  • oxidation is carried out in the presence of a homogeneous manganese-based complex coordination catalyst.
  • the homogeneous manganese-based complex coordination catalyst is typically a mononuclear or dinuclear complex of a Mn(III) or Mn(IV) transition metal.
  • the manganese will usually contain at least one organic ligand containing at least three nitrogen atoms that coordinate with the manganese, for example 1,4,7-triazacyclononane (TACN), 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (Me-TACN), 1,5,9-triazacyclododecane, 1,5,9-trimethyl-1,5,9-triazacyclododecane (Me-TACD), 2-methyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (Me/TACN), 2-methyl-1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (Me/Me-TACN), N,N',N"-(2-hyroxyethyl) 1,4,7-triazacyclononane.
  • the ratio of the manganese atoms to the nitrogen atoms is 1:3.
  • a suitable catalyst may also contain from 0 to 6 coordinating or bridging groups per manganese atom.
  • coordinating groups are for example selected from -OMe, -O-CH 2 -CH 3 , or -O-CH 2 -CH 2 -CH3.
  • bridging groups may be selected, among others, from -O-, -O-O-, or -O-CH(Me)-O-.
  • the manganese catalyst may also contain one or more monovalent or multivalent counterions leading to a charge neutrality.
  • the number of such monovalent or multivalent counterions will depend on the charge of the manganese complex which can be 0 or positive.
  • the type of the counterions needed for the charge neutrality of the complex is not critical and the counterions may be selected for example from halides such as chlorides, bromides and iodides, pseudohalides, sulphates, nitrates, methylsulfates, phosphates, acetates, perchlorates, hexafluorophosphates, or tetrafluoro-borates.
  • a particularly preferred catalyst is compound (I), dimanganese(IV)-tris(mu-oxo)-di(1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)-bis(acetate) or [(Me-TACN) 2 Mn IV 2 ( ⁇ -O)3](CH 3 COO) 2 , known as Dragon's blood or Dragon A350.
  • the manganese catalyst may be present in a total amount of from 10 to 1,000 ppm based on the weight of the starch, preferably from 20 to 500 ppm, more preferably from 30 to 200 ppm.
  • the degraded starch may be an acid-degraded starch, or an enzymatically degraded starch. How to perform acid- and enzymatic degradation of starch is well-known in the art.
  • Acid treatment can be conducted in a starch slurry (wet), dry, or semi-dry conditions.
  • the acid treatment is performed using an approximately 40% starch slurry in diluted hydrochloric or sulphuric acid and heated to 25-55°C.
  • the final properties of the resulting starch depend on the temperature, length of the treatment, type of acid and concentration.
  • Slurry converted starches are known in food industry as thin-boiling starches. They exhibit a low hot-paste viscosity after cooking and develop good gel properties when cooled.
  • Enzymatic degradation of unmodified starch is known as enzymatic conversion.
  • Starch slurry is mixed with alpha-amylase and then gradually heated to 60-90°C.
  • the required temperature depends on the pasting temperature of the starch and the type of enzyme, as is known in the art. Tuber starches have a lower pasting temperature than cereal starches.
  • Enzymatic hydrolysis can start earlier when the pasting temperature is lower.
  • Temperature and pH play are important factors for enzyme activity. An increase in temperature will speed up the rate of hydrolysis, but may also destroy part of the catalytic capacity. Optimum temperature and pH differ with enzyme source and should be based on the manufacturer specifications.
  • the presence of minerals is another factor influencing the enzyme activity. Calcium ions promote enzyme activity, whereas the presence of cupper can inhibit enzyme activity.
  • Time, temperature and pH depend the final viscosity of the degraded starch solution.
  • the enzyme activity is stopped when the required viscosity is reached. This can be done by denaturation of the enzyme by heat or reducing the pH using a mineral or organic acid.
  • the degraded root or tuber starch (or starch blend) can be stabilized by etherification or esterification.
  • the degraded root or tuber starch has not been further modified, such as by etherification or esterification.
  • the degraded root or tuber starch according to the invention is not crosslinked.
  • the degraded root or tuber starch or starch blend is characterized by a molecular weight of 0.5 - 20 • 10 6 Da (0.5 - 20 MDa).
  • the molecular weight in this context, is a weight-average molecular weight, determined as described in the examples.
  • the molecular weight is 0.75 - 18 • 10 6 Da, more preferably 1 - 17 • 10 6 Da.
  • the degraded root or tuber starch or degraded root or tuber starch blend is characterized by a viscosity, determined on a 15 wt.% aqueous solution by a Brookfield LVF viscometer at 60 rpm and at 50 °C, of 20 - 150 cP.
  • the type of spindle used to determine the viscosity is generally known from instruction manuals with a specific type of viscometer.
  • a preferred viscosity is 25-140 cP, more preferably 30 - 135 cP.
  • the starch (or starch blend) is preferably present in a quantity of 0.3 - 5 g/m 2 , preferably 0.3 - 2.5 g/m 2 , preferably 0.4 - 2 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.5 - 1.8 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.6 - 1.5 g/m 2 per side of the paper-pulp based solid substrate.
  • starch (or starch blend) can be present on the paper in a (total) quantity of 0.3 - 10 g/m 2 (single- or double sided application of the starch), preferably 0.3 - 5 g/m 2 , preferably 0.4 - 4 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.5 - 3.6 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.6 - 3 g/m 2 . It can be tested whether the paper comprises starch on one or on two sides by iodine staining, which is well-known in the art.
  • the ratio between the quantity per surface area of starch and the quantity per surface area of fluorochemical is from 10 - 80, preferably 15 - 75, more preferably from 15 - 70, even more preferably 20 - 65, even more preferably 25 - 60. These ratio's ensure good grease- and oil resistance at relatively low fluorochemical loading.
  • the paper may furthermore comprise a chelating agent, such as for example an alkali metal salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (DTPA), nitrilotriacetic acid, N-hydroxyethyl ethylenediaminetriacetic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, boric acid, hexametaphosphate, pyrophosphate, phosphate or carbonate.
  • EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
  • DTPA diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid
  • nitrilotriacetic acid N-hydroxyethyl ethylenediaminetriacetic acid
  • oxalic acid citric acid, boric acid, hexametaphosphate, pyrophosphate, phosphate or carbonate.
  • the invention further pertains to an aqueous composition for improving the oil and grease resistance of a paper-pulp based solid substrate, comprising
  • degraded root or tuber starch or root or tuber starch blend and the fluorochemical have been described above. Also the optional presence of the chelating agent and/or the acid (in case of cationic fluorochemicals) is defined elsewhere.
  • the aqueous composition preferably comprises at least 50 wt.%, preferably at least 70 wt.%, more preferably at least 90 wt.% of water, and may furthermore comprise water-miscible organic solvents.
  • Water-miscible organic solvents may be for example alcohols, preferably methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, t-butanol or ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropyleneglycol, dipropyleneglycol monomethylether, or alternatively acetone.
  • one or more acids may be included as discussed above.
  • the pH of the composition is 4 - 6, preferably 4 - 5.
  • the optional chelating agent can be for example an alkali metal salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (DTPA), nitrilotriacetic acid, N-hydroxyethyl ethylenediaminetriacetic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, boric acid, hexametaphosphate, pyrophosphate, phosphate or carbonate.
  • the chelating agent may be present in a quantity of 0.01 - 0.2 wt.% , preferably 0.03 wt.% - 0.16 wt.%, more preferably 0.05 wt.% - 0.12 wt.%.
  • the invention furthermore pertains to a method for improving the oil and grease resistance of a paper-pulp based solid substrate, comprising providing a composition as defined above, applying said composition to at least one side of the paper-pulp based solid substrate, and drying said paper-pulp based solid substrate.
  • composition is applied to the paper-pulp based solid substrate so as to result after drying in 0.3 - 5 g/m 2 , preferably 0.3 - 2.5 g/m 2 , preferably 0.4 - 2 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.5 - 1.8 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.6 - 1.5 g/m 2 degraded starch per side.
  • composition is applied such so as to result after drying in 0.01 - 0.5 g/m 2 per side, more preferably 0.015 - 0.3 g/m 2 per side, more preferably 0.02 - 0.2 g/m 2 per side, even more preferably 0.01 - 0.1 g/m 2 per side, even more preferably 0.015 - 0.05 g/m 2 per side fluorochemical.
  • the total loading after single- or double sided application on the paper of fluorochemical (after drying) can be from 0.01 - 1 g/m 2 , preferably 0.015 - 0.6 g/m 2 , more preferably from 0.02 - 0.4 g/m 2 , even more preferably 0.02 - 0.2 g/m 2 , even more preferably from 0.03 - 0.1 g/m 2 .
  • the composition can be applied by well-known methods for applying liquid compositions to paper-pulp based solid substrates.
  • the composition can be applied by a horizontal size press, a declined size press, a film press, a gate roll coater, spray coater, curtain coater, air knife coater, a metering bar or a blade coater.
  • the invention furthermore pertains to use of the above composition for improving the oil and grease resistance of a paper-pulp based solid substrate.
  • Potential uses include use for packaging, such as the packaging of food, pet food, cosmetics, vitamins, nutritional supplements and pharmaceuticals.
  • the paper-pulp based solid substrate is used for the packaging of food, pet food, cosmetics, vitamins, nutritional supplements and/or pharmaceuticals.
  • a specific amount of a root or tuber starch sample (powder (as is)) was weighed into a glass vial (20 ml). Subsequently 20 ml eluent (50 mM NaNO 3 ) was added to obtain a concentration of 2 mg/ml. The vial was capped with an aluminum/silicone septum and fitted into a heating block. The vail was heated under continuous stirring during 60 minutes at 137 °C. After cooling to room temperature some of the obtained solution was collected with a syringe (5ml), and this quantity was subsequently filtered over a 5.0 pm cellulose acetate filter into a sample vial (1.5 ml; septum/screw cap).
  • Molecular weight (MW) of the samples was determined after separation by asymmetric field flow and detected with MALLS/RI detector.
  • the MW and the molecular mass distribution (MMD) were determined by means of aF4/MALLS/RI.
  • the aF4 system consisted of a Dionex HPLC system (quaternary pump, auto sampler including a 250 ⁇ l injection loop), thermostatic column compartment, light-scattering (LS) detector (Dawn Heleos II; Wyatt), and a refractive index (RI) detector (T-rex; Wyatt).
  • the scattered light was detected at multiple angles (18) ranging from 13° to 158°.
  • the multi angle laser light scattering (MALLS) was serially connected with the concentration (RI) detector.
  • a sample is fractionated via a Frit Inlet channel with a permeable wall having a 5 kDa pore size.
  • a pullulan DIN standard 50 kDa; 2 mg/ml was used for normalization of the MALLS, and alignment of the MALLS and RI detector (correction for inter detector delay volume and bandbroading).
  • Samples were stored in the auto sampler at 25 °C to be processed automatically in a sequence overnight. Elution of the samples was carried out with an aqueous eluent (50 mM NaNO 3 ) at a specific flow regime at 25°C.
  • the sample volume was set at 50 ⁇ l based on the average concentration of all samples.
  • the data acquired during every run were collected and afterwards evaluated with the ASTRA software (version 6.1.2.84).
  • Starch is added in cold water in a tank, equipped with a suitable stirrer.
  • the obtained starch slurry is then heated in a water bath with well-dispersed live steam to a temperature of 95 °C. This temperature was maintained for 20 minutes.
  • the starch solution is stored at 50°C before use.
  • the starch solutions were diluted after cooking in tap water to the desired solids content of that series using hot water of about 60°C.
  • EDTA solution was added in a quantity of 0.6 parts dry on 100 parts starch.
  • fluorochemical was added in parts dry on 100 parts dry starch, while stirring the solution using a mixer.
  • 1000 g solution was prepared. The different mixtures where stored at 50°C before the experiments.
  • Starch viscosity is measured in a 300 mL glass beaker with a Brookfield type LVF at 60 rpm and 50°C using the appropriate spindle, as indicated in the manual. The value is recorded when the viscosity is stable, or after 60 s.
  • the starch solutions (9% by weight of starch; temperature 50°C) were applied to both sides of the base paper (Mondi Lohja, 36 g/m 2 OGR base paper) using a horizontal size press (type T.H. Dixon; model 160-B; roll hardness 80 shore).
  • the machine speed of the Dixon was 50 m/min and the line pressure was 7 kg/cm.
  • the surface sized paper was thereafter dried to 5% by weight of moisture.
  • the paper samples obtained were conditioned at 23°C and 50% relative humidity before testing.
  • the total amount applied to the paper is about 1.4 g/m 2 of starch and 0.06 g/m 2 of fluorochemical, resulting a weight ratio (per m 2 ) of 4.2 parts fluorochemical per 100 parts starch (dry/dry). Also higher or lower fluorochemical/starch ratios have been applied.
  • the quantity of fluorochemical applied onto the paper is calculated from the amount of starch applied to the paper.
  • Starch and fluorochemical are present in a composition in a known weight ratio (dry/dry), expressed as parts fluorochemical relative to 100 parts starch.
  • the starch addition applied to the paper in g/m 2 ) therefore gives the amount of fluorochemical in g/m 2 applied to the paper.
  • the oil and grease resistance is generally assessed by the resistance of a substrate against the penetration of a hydrophobic liquid.
  • the test describes a procedure for testing the degree of repellency and/or the antiwicking characteristics of paper or paperboard treated with fluorochemical sizing agents.
  • Kit test uses 12 different mixtures of hydrocarbon liquids with decreasing viscosity and surface tension. The highest numbered solution (the most aggressive) that remains on the surface of the paper without disrupting the paper structure and while providing oil and grease resistance is reported as the "kit rating”.
  • the applied method results in the OGR of the top side of the paper, or the back side of the paper (wire side).
  • the kit-rating of the different sides usually varies, due to varying processing conditions in the double-sided press for the top- and wire side of the paper.
  • a value between the two highest Kit ratings is given.
  • Solvera PT5045PG is (per)fluoropolyether from Solvay Solexis with a dry solids content of about 20%.
  • Dissolvine is a 40% EDTA solution from Akzo Nobel.
  • Starch B was prepared similarly as Starch A, but now 20.1 ml of a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 179 g/liter of active chlorine was added.
  • Starch C was prepared similarly as Starch A, but now 63.7 ml of a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 179 g/liter of active chlorine was added.
  • Starch D a blend of 0.5 kg regular potato starch (0.41 kg dry matter, food grade potato starch from AVEBE; amylopectin content 81%) and 0.5 kg of amylopectin potato starch (0.41 kg dry matter, Eliane ® potato starch from AVEBE; amylopectin content >98%) was suspended in 1.0 kg of water. The temperature of the suspension was increased to 35 °C. The pH was set at 9.0 by the addition of a 4.4 wt.% sodium hydroxide solution. 48.0 ml of a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 179 g/liter of active chlorine was added.
  • Starch E was prepared similarly as Starch A, but now 111.7 ml of a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 179 g/liter of active chlorine was added.
  • Reference 6 was prepared similarly as Reference 5, except that now 36.3 ml sodium hypochlorite solution containing 179 g/liter of active chlorine was added.
  • Table 1 starches used Starch Botanical source Mw*10e6 [g/mole] Viscosity [15%, 50°C, 60 rpm] Reference 1 Potato starch 0.29 14 Reference 2 A dextrin of a blend of waxy corn starch and corn starch 0,07; 300 35 Reference 3 oxidized potato starch 0.24 20 Reference 4 oxidized potato starch 0.63 23 Reference 5 oxidized potato starch 1.8 solid gel Reference 6 oxidized potato starch 4.8 solid gel A oxidized waxy potato starch 6.6 90 B oxidized waxy potato starch 17 135 C oxidized waxy potato starch 3 31 D oxidized blend of waxy potato starch and potato starch (1:1 weight ratio) 4.8 66 E oxidized waxy potato starch 1 22
  • Table 1 shows that the high molecular weight products produced from pure potato starch are not stable and therefore cannot be used for surface treatment applications. Products produced from waxy potato starch or a blend of waxy potato starch are stable and can therefore be used. Only products with a relatively low molecular weight are stable enough for surface treatment compositions.
  • compositions based on different starches were applied in combination with a (per)fluoropolyether from Solvay (Solvera PT5045PG) at constant starch concentration of 9% and at a fixed (weight) ratio starch : fluorochemical of 4.2 parts fluorochemical per 100 parts starch.
  • Table 2 shows that the compositions of the invention show higher oil and grease resistance at the same fluorochemical level as measured with Tappi T559.
  • Table 3 shows that the compositions of the invention give the same oil and grease resistance using less fluorochemical as compared to the compositions with the reference starches as measured according to Tappi T559.
  • compositions were either applied using low concentrated solutions (5-6 wt.%) and 12 parts fluorochemical, or using high concentrated solutions (9-10 wt.%) and 4.2 parts fluorochemical. In all cases the amount of fluorochemical was similar.
  • the coatings were applied using a Dixon coater as described in Example 1.
  • Table 4 shows that only the compositions of the invention show an improvement of the oil and grease resistance when the concentration increases while keeping the amount of fluorochemical at the same level. Oil and grease resistance was measured according to Tappi T559. Compositions with the reference starches do not show the improvement.
  • compositions were applied onto paper using a Dixon coater as described in example 1.
  • a different base paper was used (OGR base paper, ex. Pfleiderer Teisnach, 37 g/m2).
  • the coatings were the same as described in Example 1 except that in this case a different base paper was used.
  • Table 5 shows that a composition according to the inventions improves the oil and grease resistance of a different type of base paper.
  • compositions of the invention were applied at different concentrations.
  • the fluorochemical/starch ratio was changed at a constant quantity of fluorochemical of between 0.08 and 0.09 g/m 2 .
  • Table 6 A A A A Concentration 5% 9% 11% 15% EDTA [parts] 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Fluorchemical [parts] 12 6 4.2 2 Starch [g/m 2 ] 0.73 1.49 1.91 3.28 Fluorchemical [g/m 2 ] 0.088 0.09 0.08 0.066 SF-ratio 8 17 24 50 Kit top side 7 9 10 12 Kit wire side 8 12 12 12 12 12
  • Table 6 shows that by increasing the ratio between starch and fluorochemical at constant quantity of fluorochemical, the kit rating of the paper increases.
  • the fluorochemical Cartaguard KHI is a cationic perfluoro polyether which is commercially available from Archroma with a dry solid content of approx. 15 wt.%.
  • a composition comprising Cartaguard KHI and starch of the invention A was prepared according to the following table 7, as well as a reference composition using Ref 3.
  • the compositions according to the invention where applied onto the same Mondi Lohja paper described above, using the same Dixon coater size press application as defined above.
  • composition according to the invention improves the oil and grease resistance in comparison to the composition using a reference starch also when using a cationic fluorochemical.
  • composition of the invention comprising a starch of the invention imparts a much higher kit resistance in comparison to a composition using a reference starch.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)
  • Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)

Claims (16)

  1. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, comprenant un composé fluoré et un amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé ou un mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé, lequel amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé ou mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé comprend 90 - 100 % en poids, sur la base du poids total de l'amidon ou du mélange d'amidon, d'amylopectine, et lequel amidon de tubercule ou de racine ou mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine est caractérisé par un poids moléculaire de 0,5 - 20 • 106 Da, et une viscosité déterminée sur une solution aqueuse à 15 % en poids par un viscosimètre Brookfield LVF à 60 rpm et à 50 °C, de 20 - 150 cP, dans lequel le substrat solide à base de pâte à papier est du papier ou du carton.
  2. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'amidon ou le mélange d'amidon dégradé comprend de l'amidon de pomme de terre.
  3. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel l'amidon ou le mélange d'amidon dégradé comprend un amidon oxydé.
  4. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel l'amidon ou le mélange d'amidon dégradé est un mélange d'amidon comprenant de l'amidon cireux avec une teneur en amylopectine de plus de 95 % en poids, sur la base du poids de l'amidon, et de l'amidon ordinaire avec une teneur en amylopectine de 70 - 85 % en poids, sur la base du poids de l'amidon.
  5. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel l'amidon est présent en une quantité de 0,3 - 5 g/m2 par côté du substrat solide à base de pâte à papier.
  6. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel la quantité de composé fluoré est de 0,01 - 0,5 g/m2 par côté du substrat solide à base de pâte à papier.
  7. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans lequel le rapport entre la quantité d'amidon par surface et la quantité de composé fluoré par surface est de 10 - 80.
  8. Composition aqueuse pour améliorer la résistance à l'huile et à la graisse d'un substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, comprenant
    • 2 - 20 % en poids d'un amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé ou un mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé, lequel amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé ou mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine dégradé comprend de 90 - 100 % en poids, sur la base du poids total de l'amidon ou du mélange d'amidon, d'amylopectine, et lequel amidon de tubercule ou de racine ou mélange d'amidon de tubercule ou de racine est caractérisé par un poids moléculaire de 0,5 - 20 • 106 Da, et une viscosité, déterminée sur une solution aqueuse à 15 % en poids par un viscosimètre Brookfield LVF à 60 rpm et à 50 °C, de 20 - 150 cP ;
    • 0,04 - 2 % en poids d'un composé fluoré ;
    • facultativement un agent chélateur ;
    dans laquelle le substrat solide à base de pâte à papier est du papier ou du carton.
  9. Composition selon la revendication 8, dans laquelle l'agent chélateur est un sel de métal alcalin de l'acide éthylène diamine tétra-acétique (EDTA), de l'acide diéthylène triamine penta acétique (DTPA), de l'acide nitrilotriacétique, de l'acide N-hydroxyéthyléthylènediaminetriacétique, de l'acide oxalique, de l'acide citrique, de l'acide borique, de l'hexamétaphosphate, du pyrophosphate, du phosphate ou du carbonate.
  10. Méthode pour améliorer la résistance à l'huile et à la graisse d'un substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, comprenant la fourniture d'une composition telle que définie dans l'une quelconque des revendications 8 ou 9, l'application de ladite composition sur au moins un côté du substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, et le séchage dudit substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, dans laquelle ledit substrat solide à base de pâte à papier est du papier ou du carton.
  11. Méthode selon la revendication 10, dans laquelle la composition est appliquée au substrat solide à base de pâte à papier de manière à obtenir, après séchage, 0,3 - 10 g/m2 d'amidon dégradé et 0,01 - 1 g/m2 de composé fluoré.
  12. Méthode selon la revendication 10 ou 11, dans laquelle la composition est appliquée par une presse à format horizontal, une presse à format décliné, une presse à film, une coucheuse à rouleau barreur, une coucheuse par pulvérisation, une coucheuse à nappe, une coucheuse à lame d'air, une barre de dosage ou une coucheuse à lame.
  13. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, composition selon la revendication 8 ou 9, ou méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 10 à 12, dans lesquels le composé fluoré est un composé fluoré cationique ou un composé fluoré anionique, de préférence un composé fluoré anionique.
  14. Substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, composition selon la revendication 8 ou 9, ou méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 10 à 12 tels que définis dans la revendication 13, dans lesquels le composé fluoré anionique est un fluoropolyéther ou perfluoropolyéther anionique.
  15. Utilisation d'une composition telle que définie dans les revendications 8 ou 9 pour améliorer la résistance à l'huile et à la graisse d'un substrat solide à base de pâte à papier, dans laquelle le substrat solide à base de pâte à papier est du papier ou du carton.
  16. Utilisation d'un substrat solide à base de pâte à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7 pour le conditionnement d'aliments, d'aliments pour animaux domestiques, de cosmétiques, de vitamines, de compléments nutritionnels, de produits pharmaceutiques.
EP17790861.3A 2016-09-30 2017-09-29 Papier ingraissable Active EP3519625B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16191852.9A EP3301220A1 (fr) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Papier ingraissable
PCT/NL2017/050649 WO2018062993A1 (fr) 2016-09-30 2017-09-29 Papier sulfurisé

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3519625A1 EP3519625A1 (fr) 2019-08-07
EP3519625B1 true EP3519625B1 (fr) 2022-10-05

Family

ID=57103840

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16191852.9A Withdrawn EP3301220A1 (fr) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Papier ingraissable
EP17790861.3A Active EP3519625B1 (fr) 2016-09-30 2017-09-29 Papier ingraissable

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16191852.9A Withdrawn EP3301220A1 (fr) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Papier ingraissable

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (2) EP3301220A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2930855T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018062993A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20200002069A1 (en) * 2018-06-28 2020-01-02 Kruger Holdings L.P. Grease resistant paperboard and pizza box made therewith
CN108957010A (zh) * 2018-08-22 2018-12-07 南京工业大学 一种可检测过敏反应的纸基传感器及其制备和应用
EP3825368A1 (fr) 2019-11-20 2021-05-26 Coöperatie Koninklijke Avebe U.A. Composition de barrière exempte de plastifiant
AT526258B1 (de) 2022-06-24 2025-10-15 Mondi Ag Fettabweisendes papier
CN119736814B (zh) * 2025-03-06 2025-05-02 浙江九本环保技术有限公司 一种造纸用乳液型阴离子干强剂及其制备方法

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3562099A (en) * 1968-01-17 1971-02-09 William R Wasko Erasable paper and process for making same
US5833755A (en) 1996-03-25 1998-11-10 National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation Starch degradation using metal-based coordination complexes
DE69925741T2 (de) * 1998-07-23 2005-12-15 Coöperatieve Verkoop- en Productievereniging van Aardappelmeel en Derivaten 'AVEBE' B.A. Klebemittelzusammensetzung
CN1209376C (zh) 1998-07-31 2005-07-06 马铃薯及衍生产品合作销售生产阿韦贝公司 淀粉的氧化
FR2810042B1 (fr) * 2000-06-13 2004-04-16 Roquette Freres Nouvelle composition amylacee contenant une matiere amylacee cationique
US20050252628A1 (en) 2004-05-11 2005-11-17 Day James F Stabilizing compositions
CA2621110C (fr) * 2005-07-22 2012-12-18 International Paper Company Substrat papier contenant un compose comportant du fluor et presentant une impermeabilite a la graisse et une aptitude au collage ameliorees
EP2009035A1 (fr) 2007-06-27 2008-12-31 Huntsman Textile Effects (Germany) GmbH Copolymères avec des groupes perfluoralkyles, et leurs dispersions aqueuses
ES2607006T3 (es) 2008-07-01 2017-03-28 Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A. Proceso para conferir repelencia a grasa, aceite y agua a sustratos
MX2011012923A (es) 2009-06-05 2012-01-25 Solvay Proceso para fabricar almidon oxidado, almidon oxidado y su uso.
IT1406089B1 (it) * 2011-02-22 2014-02-06 Lamberti Spa Composizioni per impartire resistenza a grassi e oli
EP2607397A1 (fr) 2011-12-21 2013-06-26 Clariant International Ltd. Composition fluorochimique et usage correspondant
FI124234B (en) * 2012-03-23 2014-05-15 Kemira Oyj Method for dissolving cationic starch, papermaking agent and its use

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2018062993A1 (fr) 2018-04-05
WO2018062993A8 (fr) 2018-05-24
EP3519625A1 (fr) 2019-08-07
ES2930855T3 (es) 2022-12-22
EP3301220A1 (fr) 2018-04-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3519625B1 (fr) Papier ingraissable
US11332647B2 (en) Microfibrillated cellulose as rheology modifier in adhesives
KR100559358B1 (ko) 제지용 전분
WO1999012977A1 (fr) Amidon modifie
EP1235959B1 (fr) Procede de fabrication de papier
EP1112287B1 (fr) Oxydation d'amidon
US6777548B1 (en) Oxidation of starch
EP3818122B1 (fr) Cellulose microfibrillee pour controler la viscosite et la température de gélatinisation dans des adhesifs a base d'amidon
JP6830961B2 (ja) デンプンの酸化
MX2011006430A (es) Proceso para la elaboracion de papel.
Xu et al. Bioextrusion of broken rice in the presence of divalent metal salts: effects on starch microstructure and phenolics compounds
JP4754481B2 (ja) カチオン性液体デンプン質組成物及びその使用
US10132037B2 (en) Stabilized sizing formulation
US20130225803A1 (en) Method for preparing hydroxyalkyl starch
US20030145966A1 (en) Process for making paper
US11180890B2 (en) Fluorochemical-free oil and grease resistant cellulosic materials
EP0737777B2 (fr) Procédé de collage en surface du papier
Tian et al. Unravelling the mechanism of enzymatic resistance in different high amylose starch granules
Li et al. Cationization of field pea starch in salt-free aqueous suspension
US20060263510A1 (en) Hydroxyl radical modification of carbohydrates
CN113366058A (zh) 淀粉组合物
CA3121665A1 (fr) Amidons hydroxyalkyles degrades et leurs procedes de preparation
MXPA01002551A (en) Oxidation of starch

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190411

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: COOEPERATIE KONINKLIJKE AVEBE U.A.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220504

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1522829

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20221015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017062416

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2930855

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20221222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230206

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230105

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230205

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017062416

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230929

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Free format text: CASE NUMBER: UPC_APP_412756/2023

Effective date: 20230505

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: U11

Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-U10-U11 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE)

Effective date: 20251001

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20250929

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250919

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20250918

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20250923

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20250919

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250922

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20250919

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20250918

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20250925

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 1522829

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20221005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221005

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20251001

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20251030

Year of fee payment: 9