JP2000297742A - Permanently operable device by improving perpetual motion machine using 'tysonnel', 'glibert' magnet and permanently operable device by improving perpetual motion machine using magnet proposed in jp laid-open number, s56-98377 - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a permanently moving toy by utilizing the characteristic of a magnet having a special shape such as a double-face double-pole magnet having a short distance between both magnetic poles and gravitational force. SOLUTION: A steep slope has a structure for sending a dropped hollow steel ball to a next gentle slope. Two double-face double-pole permanent magnets are used, and their polarities are made equal. Each double-face double-pole permanent magnet has a concave curve matched with the gentle slope, its opening is decreased from the lower section toward the upper section, and its shape is changed from a large arc shape to a small arc shape from the lower section toward the upper section. Magnetic force is reduced according to the distance between the steel ball and the magnet by the Coulomb's law. Such a method is considered more effective that a stronger magnet is used and the interval between the steel ball and the magnet is made wider at the upper section and relatively narrower at the lower section. A permanently moving toy can be manufactured by utilizing this device.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION There is a phrase that "literature is plagiarism." Others say that a great invention is the accumulation of small technologies. We believe that true originality is rare and that many achievements came from imitation. In another dimension, the music score between composers includes the problem of Pak Kuta Pak Lanai, the origin of the hot spring bun, and the original family fight. Imitation and plagiarism have been around for a long time and are likely to continue regardless of good faith or bad faith. Since the discovery of magnets by humans, people must have been amazed at the mysterious power and tried to make useful things with magnets. China's compass, and research and invention by many people in many countries and many places for a long time not only on the "permanent institution" record? I think it was done. I wrote it as a perpetual institution of "Tyce Niels" and "Gilbert", but this is also very uncertain and it is correct to be unclear who first thought or made this device. 2 of the same author on magnets
The book states that the same device was inconsistent with the invention of "Tynis Niels" and the invention of "Gilbert." Another book claims the invention of Wilkins, the author of Mathematical Magic a little later than Gilbert.

(FIG. 1) It is a figure of what is regarded as a permanent engine of "Wilkins". In "Mathematical magic", "Wilkins" expresses negative opinions on gravity-based and chemical eternal institutions, but it is positive for eternal institutions using magnets due to the influence of scientific ideas at the time. He said, though not necessarily, that he could be hopeful. Regarding `` Tynis Niels '', I can not find it except in the above magnet book, I can not find it in a foreign name dictionary, at last, in the translated book of `` Gilbert '' I finally named `` Tys Niel '' as `` Tys Niel '' I found it. Probably the same person. However, "Tysnel" is not very popular in this book and is treated like a plagiarist. The inventor of this device is "Wilkins"
I think it would be best to say that Wilkins and Gilbert, who were before Gilbert, experimented, verified, and wrote a book. However, here, since it is general, it is a permanent engine that uses magnets of "Tynis Niels" and "Gilbert". Naturally, in the translated book of "Gilbert", "Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 56-8937
The figure also shows a device which is considered to have the same idea theory as the invention of "7". Quoted from a book on magnets (Fig. 2) (Fig. 3) Permanent agency of "Gilbert".

In this book, it is written as follows. Gilbert considered a device that combines gravity and magnetic force, as shown in Figures 2 and 3 (1.6). The iron ball is dropped from the side of the magnet, and the magnet pulls it up to its original position using the slope. The sphere falls from a hole drilled just before the magnet. From there, it rolls down to the bottom of the slope, and on its recoil, rides on the slope. The magnet can be pulled up to the top of the slope immediately. The idea is that this exercise should be repeated any number of times. Gilbert must have experimented. The result is, of course, obvious. But he would have thought that the failure was due to a weak magnet. As long as there is a stronger magnet, I'm sorry to see inside Dr. Gilbert's chest.ど う か Aside from whether this content was true (around 1600, Gilbert, who left many works and doctors and scientists in England during the battle of Sekigahara in Japan in the era of the battle of Sekigahara) It is thought that this device was not so simple.) I think that this device contains thoughts that can be taken as truth. As will be described later, the strong magnetic force is relative to the device and is not an absolute condition. An iron ball is climbed by magnetic force on a gentle slope and dropped by gravity on a steep slope. In other words, the steep slope is dropped by gravity, and the gentle slope is climbed by inertia, inertia, and magnetic force. Experts and intellectuals would not be able to imagine such things from such diagrams. Quote from another magnet book.

Did you create a permanent magnet engine? In the old days, in 1570, the Jesuit priest Tynis Niels conceived a device that combined magnetic and gravitational forces. He believed that this would continue his exercise forever. It is a device as shown in FIG. 4 (5.32), in which a natural magnet M is placed at the end of a linear slope. Immediately before the magnet there is a hole A, from which a bypass passes through the back of the slope to the bottom B. The lowermost end of the bypass is raised so as to surround the lower end of the straight slope. Now, when the iron ball is dropped from the hole A to the bypass, the ball rolls down along the curve, and due to its inertia, at the B end, the iron ball jumps up to the lower end of the slope. Then, under the attraction of the magnet, the ball is lifted on the slope and reaches A. At A, the person falls again into the bypass from the hole and repeats the above-described exercise. In this way, the iron ball keeps moving up and down forever. Of course, such a movement has not been realized. In order to pull up the iron ball along the slope, the magnet must be very strong, and if it is so strong, the iron ball once pulled up will come to the hole A,
Don't be attracted by magnets and fall to the bypass.
Even when the iron ball rolls on the bypass, the strong attractive force of the magnet is working, so will the momentum jump up to the slope at the B end? The magnet needs to be strong to pull the ball up the slope, but it also works the other way, braking the movement you want to continue. The condition that you think is good is the bad condition when you turn it over. Should it be a two-edged blade? It seems that those who dream of eternal movement are only concerned about the good aspects of themselves and not aware of the bad aspects. This is common throughout the world, from ancient times to the present.図 (Fig. 4) It is a permanent engine of “Tays Niels”. Therefore, this device is changed so that it moves in one direction.

(FIG. 5) is an elevational view of the device in which the circulating motion of the iron ball of FIG. 4 is changed in one direction. (FIG. 6) is a plan view of the device in which the circulating motion of the iron ball of FIG. 4 is changed in one direction. The device has a groove in the center, on which an iron ball is placed. On both sides of the gentle slope, instead of magnetite placed at the top of FIG. 3, elongated two-sided two-pole permanent magnets are arranged so that the distance between them becomes narrower toward the top. It is thought that the iron ball is carried to the upper part by the force of the magnet, falls by gravity at the border with the steep slope, and proceeds to the next device by inertia to continue the same movement.
Again, experts and experts will say: "What does a de amateur who doesn't even know the beginning of physics say?" Certainly, the force, movement and work for moving the iron ball on gentle and steep slopes are the same. However, it is considered that both cases are directed to gravity, and are different when magnetic force is involved. (The relationship between magnetic force and gravity and the difference are described in detail in another application and are omitted here.) The gentle slope of the apparatus shown in FIG. 5 is replaced with a horizontal plane.

FIG. 7 is an elevational view of the apparatus of FIG. 5 with the gentle slope replaced by a horizontal plane.

It is assumed that the two magnets at the boundary between the horizontal plane and the steep slope cannot hold the iron ball by suction. But the effect of geomagnetism on the iron ball,
No matter how weak the magnetic force is, if the friction and resistance are not considered, the iron ball travels on a horizontal plane and falls down a steep slope, and after that all the energy at the position has not been lost. Then, the steepest slope on which the iron ball can be climbed and dropped is determined not from the horizontal plane but from the relationship between the magnetic force and the inclination.

(Figure 8) Imaginary picture of an iron ball climbing a gentle slope and falling on a steep slope. This magnet cannot lift an iron ball. But you can roll it. It is thought that it is possible to climb the slope by magnetic force and drop it on a steep slope. Depending on the relationship between the distance between the iron ball and the magnet, the magnet may have any strength.

The relationship between this iron ball, the slope and the magnetic force The weight and the state of the iron ball (hollow condition) The slope condition and shape of the slope The shape of the magnet (cylindrical type, its divided type, the number, etc.) Many conditions and requirements need to be considered, and no conclusion can be made easily. However, experimental experience suggests that the following device is better.

FIG. 9 is an elevational view of the device considered better.

(FIG. 10) A plan view of a device considered to be better (FIG. 11) A side view of the device considered to be better (from the left)
(Figure 12) Side view of the device considered to be better (from the right)
The iron ball is hollow. The gentle slope with a groove is slightly concave. The steep slope has a structure that allows the dropped iron ball to be connected to the next gentle slope. The double-sided double-pole permanent magnet has a concave surface so as to fit a gentle slope. The double-sided double-pole permanent magnet reduces its opening from the bottom to the top. The double-sided double-pole permanent magnet has its own shape from the bottom to the top. From a large arc to a small arc There is a decrease in magnetic force due to the distance between the iron ball and the magnet due to Coulomb's law (?). It may be more effective to use a stronger magnet and widen the distance between the iron ball and the magnet in the upper part and relatively narrow the distance in the lower part. This device is used to make permanently moving toys.

(Claim 1) The apparatus shown in FIG.

(FIG. 13) Elevated view of the device (FIG. 14) Plan view of the device If this device were to operate permanently, it would be comparable to the famous permanent toy "Water only bird" Think of it as something. As I wrote before, the biggest reason that such a device became possible is that the development of science and technology has led to the production of specially shaped magnets such as double-sided two-pole magnets, which are described as being short between magnetic poles. I think that it was. In the past, only pole magnets, horseshoe-shaped, and U-shaped magnets that could be described as having a long gap between the magnetic poles could be made. As shown in FIG. 1, the figure of a permanent engine of "Wilkins" has a car rotated by an iron ball falling on a steep slope. "Wilkins"
Also considers adding magnetic force to the iron ball itself in his book. From this idea, it is considered that a copper wire coil can be installed in the middle of a steep slope to generate electricity by electromagnetic induction. A further development of this is the device of claim 3 described below. Next, an apparatus for improving a permanent engine using a magnet disclosed in JP-A-56-98377 (FIG. 15) is a view of JP-A-56-98377.

Quoted from a book on perpetual institutions. FIG. 15 (66) shows a permanent engine in which a rotational force is obtained by using the attraction force and repulsion force of a magnet. A plurality of magnets A are fixed to the outer periphery of the rotor at equal intervals, and the same number of magnets B as the magnets A are arranged at equal intervals on the inner periphery of the stator. The arrangement of the magnetic poles of the magnets A and B is such that one magnet A has N poles and S poles alternately arranged along the periphery, and the other magnet B has only the same poles. Then, the same polarity of the magnetic force repels and the different polarity attracts, so that the rotor receives a counterclockwise force and rotates. There is a point near the magnet B where the north pole of the magnet B attracts the south pole of the magnet A most strongly.
The south pole of passes through that point. With the passage of the rotation of the S-pole, the N-pole of the magnet A paired with the S-pole also passes through the point, so that the magnet A and the magnet B become N-poles and the rotation in the same direction is continued by the repulsive force. By repeating this one after another, the rotation of the rotor continues forever. Then why is this invention not a permanent institution? The inventor's mistake is that magnet A easily passes by inertia through the point where the north pole of magnet B attracts the south pole of magnet A most strongly. The reader is supposedly experienced that a force is required to separate these magnets when the two magnets are attached to each other, but the south pole of the magnet A, which is closest to the north pole of the magnet B, is likely to have the drawback. The inertia of the rotor alone is not enough to pretend to pass through that point by precluding the matching force.
It is considered that the S pole stops at a point closest to the N pole of the magnet B. ‥‥‥‥ (FIG. 16) is an improved version of the device of FIG.

This device transformed the salient poles in the outer 8 into the outer 8. We thought that the rotation would continue if this was done. We built an experimental machine, albeit a poor one. Even if a force is applied first to rotate, it will soon stop as shown in FIG. The attractive force of the magnets trying to stop the rotation at the salient pole positions marked with N and S in FIG. 16 is larger than the sum of the attractive force and the repulsive force trying to continue the rotation at many other points. It seems to be quite strong.
A force and a point for stopping the rotation at the position where N and S are entered, and a force for continuing the rotation at other places have also been confirmed. It is considered that the reason why this experimental machine stopped was that the number of magnets and their spacing could not be sufficiently secured due to the small size of this device. It is conceivable that the Coulomb's law representing the strength of a magnet, which had been considered up to now, does not apply to the case of a real magnet. This device is once converted to linear motion.

FIG. 17 is a view in which FIG. 16 is replaced by a linear motion.

In this figure, both sides are fixed and the central part is movable. The force in FIG. 16 is considered by an arrow. The thick arrows on the second two salient poles on the left are the large forces trying to stop the movement of the center. The other thin arrow is the force moving the center. Currently computer simulation (acting)
Technology is very developed. Consider the number of magnets at the center and both sides, the strength interval, and the requirement that the sum of the forces that hinder the movement of the center at the head and the forces that try to move it at many other parts be large Look for conditions. I think it may be required by simulation. At that point it returns to circular motion. The device is claim 2. Since there is no such figure at present, FIG. 16 is substituted.

(Claim 2) Apparatus of FIG. 16 Even if this apparatus is moved, the efficiency of the magnet will be as described in Japanese Patent Application No.
0-72977 "appears to be considerably lower. Aside from being a good expression, it is the difference between a paddle wheel ship and a screw ship or the difference between an old vertical wind turbine and a horizontal lift wind turbine.

Next, an apparatus using a magnet pendulum and a copper wire coil.

(FIG. 18) Elevation view of the magnet pendulum and copper wire coil device (FIG. 19) Plan view of the magnet pendulum and copper wire coil device In this figure, the pendulum is a combination of a ball and a thread, but a rod-shaped support and a circle A combination of arc-shaped magnets is also conceivable. We want to get more output energy than input energy with this device. The pendulum magnet is reciprocated by input. This exercise is said to last semi-permanently if there is no resistance or load. It is considered that the reciprocating motion of the magnet causes an electromagnetic induction phenomenon in the copper wire coil to generate electric power. Of course, it is not considered that this force and movement can be obtained as an electric current. Numerous issues are possible. The biggest one is the power according to "Lentz" law. When a magnet is moved with respect to a coil as shown in the figure (not shown) from a book of physics, a magnetic field is generated due to the induced current, and the magnet receives a force due to the magnetic field.
This is the opposite of the force that initially moves the magnet. ‥‥‥
‥ (Omitted) However, many natural phenomena are given a certain change in the system, and the response of the system to that occurs in the direction that minimizes the change ‥‥‥‥ (Omitted) ‥‥ “Lenz's law is electromagnetic It states that the induction phenomenon is one of the above cases. ‥‥‥‥‥‥ However, this force is apparent and may not act as a load on the movement of the magnet, including when an iron bar is inserted into the coil. (This may also be related to the idea of the law of action, reaction in my other application.) Using a Foucault pendulum in this device does not require input energy. (However, this is also considered to have an effect on the rotation and orbit of the earth. There is also a view that it is insignificant compared with the effect of the tide and need not be considered.) In addition, from a similar idea, an iron ball magnet and a U-shape Apparatus using a slope (cycloidal curve) A device using the repulsive force of a coil spring and a magnet is also conceivable. Assuming that the device of claims 1 and 2 operates permanently and the output energy of the device of claim 3 is larger than the input energy including load and resistance, "the first law of thermodynamics-the law of conservation of energy" Must be denied and a new idea must be considered.

Finally, quoted from a book on "free energy" In this book, a device for extracting and utilizing space energy by electric or magnetic means is defined as a free energy device (Free-energy Devices). As the deficiencies of the heavy use of resource energies such as coal, petroleum, and nuclear power are exposed, the need for clean alternative energies is greatly increasing. Therefore, research has been conducted on the effective use of environmental energy such as solar heat and light, wind power and water management as a major issue in future cities. Free energy from the subject space is one such clean energy. The space behind all objects is filled with enormous amounts of space energy, called by various names such as the ether field and the gravity field, everywhere, day or night, everywhere. Therefore, it is intended to take this out by appropriate means and use it. When the fuel is ignited, the heat of reaction causes the next fuel to react, and in the same way that combustion continues, when the free energy device is started, a part of the space energy flowing into the device is used as the internal power of the device It is possible to extract and use the space energy while keeping the image permanent. In this way, because new energy is constantly flowing in from the outside, it is not a perpetual institution, nor does it violate the law of conservation of energy. The free energy of the second law of thermodynamics represents the energy that can be taken out of the system and used for work,
Always smaller than the total energy of the system. Since free energy devices can provide higher output (super efficiency) than electromagnetic input from outside, there is a theory that energy coming out of these devices should be called free energy, but in a broad sense including space Given this system, these extracted energies are much less than the total energy of the system,
It can be called free energy because it can be used for work outside the system. Furthermore, this space energy is a big feature that it is free no matter how much you use it, and it is also an advantage,
From this point of view, "Free" indicating free is also perfect as a word feeling. Therefore, translators and others adopted "free energy" in katakana as a translation. ‥‥‥‥

[Brief description of the drawings]

Fig. 1 Permanent organization of "Wilkins" (Magnetic Verticals)

[Figure 2] Permanent organization of "Gilbert"

[Fig. 3] Permanent organization of "Gilbert"

[Figure 4] Permanent organization of "Tays Niels"

FIG. 5 is an elevational view of the device in which the circulating motion of the iron ball of FIG. 3 is changed in one direction.

FIG. 6 is a plan view of the device in which the circulating motion of the iron ball in FIG. 3 is changed in one direction.

FIG. 7 is an elevational view of the apparatus of FIG. 4 in which the gentle slope is changed to a horizontal plane.

Fig. 8 Imaginary figure of an iron ball climbing a gentle slope and falling on a steep slope

FIG. 9 is an elevation view of a device considered to be better.

FIG. 10 is a plan view of a device considered to be better.

FIG. 11 is a side view of the device considered to be better (from the left).

FIG. 12 is a side view of the device considered to be better (from the right).

FIG. 13 is an elevational view of a permanently moving toy.

FIG. 14 is a plan view of a permanently moving toy.

FIG. 15 is a diagram of “JP-A-56-98377”.

FIG. 16 is a diagram obtained by improving the diagram of “JP-A-56-98377”.

FIG. 17 is a diagram obtained by replacing FIG. 16 with a linear motion.

FIG. 18 is an elevation view of a diagram using a magnet pendulum and a copper wire coil.

FIG. 19 is a plan view of a drawing using a magnet pendulum and a copper wire coil.

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of the front page (54) [Title of the Invention] An improved permanent engine using the magnets of "Ties Niels" and "Gilbert" which has the possibility of operating permanently and "JP-A-56-98377 An improved permanent engine using magnets that can operate permanently and a device that can obtain more output energy than input energy using a magnet pendulum and copper coil

Claims (3)

[Claims] 1. The apparatus of FIG. 2. The apparatus of FIG. 3. The apparatus of FIG.