JP2004234531A - Contract manufacturing order system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a contract manufacturing order system capable of easily performing order assignment to a plurality of manufacturing places with adjustment so that the stock is a necessary minimum quantity while ensuring the lowest guaranteed amount. <P>SOLUTION: In this system, the lowest guaranteed amount of each manufacturing place set by a guaranteed amount setting means is compared with an amount of payment obtained by multiplying the order number of worked products of each manufacturing place set by an order number setting means by the unit price of the worked products by a guaranteed amount comparison means, and when the amount of payment is under the lowest guaranteed amount, the order number of the worked products is changed by an order number changing means so that the amount of payment exceeds the lowest guaranteed amount. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO&NCIPI

Description

[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a system for ordering consignment processing to a plurality of processing sites.
[0002]
[Prior art]
Conventionally, for example, in the apparel industry, which handles high-variety and small-volume production of high-end women's clothing and also has a trendy apparel-related business, ordering of commissioned processing to each processing plant is based on past results and An order plan for a processing request is made based on the production capacity or the type of a product currently in process, and a meeting is made at each processing site to adjust the inventory and the amount of the processing request.
[0003]
In particular, depending on the processing plant in charge, there is a case where a minimum guarantee amount is set, and after guaranteeing this minimum guarantee amount, ordering outsourcing processing to multiple processing sites while adjusting to the necessary minimum inventory amount It was common to do.
[0004]
In addition, using an information service network that is open to the entire apparel industry, a sewing company performs order processing, production planning, production management, and production instructions for fabrics that conform to the specifications of the apparel company and that are easy to sew. It has also been proposed (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
[0005]
[Patent Document 1]
JP-A-5-307562
[0006]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, in the apparel industry, the task of assigning orders to each processing plant is complicated due to the fact that it deals with high-variety, small-volume production and highly fashionable clothing-related items, and also considers the minimum guarantee amount for each processing plant. In addition, it is extremely difficult to make an ordering plan while adjusting the inventory amount to the minimum necessary amount.
[0007]
The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and the purpose is to guarantee the minimum guarantee amount, and adjust the order so that the necessary inventory amount becomes the minimum necessary, and allocate an order to a plurality of processing sites. It is intended to provide a commissioned processing order system that can be easily performed.
[0008]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The consignment processing ordering system according to the present invention for achieving the object is a system for performing consignment processing ordering for a plurality of processing sites, and storage means for storing respective production results of the plurality of processing sites, A production performance comparison means for comparing the production performance of each processing site stored in the storage means, and an order quantity of a processed product is set according to a ratio of the production performance of each processing site compared by the production performance comparison means. Order quantity setting means, guarantee amount setting means for setting the minimum guarantee amount for each processing site, minimum guarantee amount for each processing site set by the guarantee amount setting means, and each processing set by the order quantity setting means A guarantee amount comparing means for comparing the order quantity of the processed product at the place with a payment amount obtained by multiplying the unit price of the processed product; and a case where the payment amount compared by the guaranteed amount comparing means is lower than the minimum guaranteed amount. The Amount due is characterized by having a quantity ordered changing means for changing the order quantity of the workpiece to be greater than the outermost low guarantee amount.
[0009]
Since the present invention is configured as described above, first, the order quantity setting means sets the order quantity of the processed product according to the ratio of the production results of each processing plant, and multiplies the order quantity by the unit price of the processed product. The payment amount is compared with the minimum guarantee amount for the processing plant, and if the payment amount is lower than the minimum guarantee amount, the order quantity changing means changes the order quantity of the processed product so that the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount. In this way, it is possible to guarantee the minimum guarantee amount for each processing site and easily allocate orders to a plurality of processing sites while adjusting the inventory amount to the minimum necessary amount.
[0010]
Also, the order quantity changing means compensates for the guaranteed crack amount in descending order of the guaranteed crack amount obtained by subtracting the paid amount from the minimum guaranteed amount among the processing plants where the paid amount is less than the minimum guaranteed amount. In order to reduce the order quantity of the processed product by the minimum guarantee amount in the order of the allocation of each processed product in the processing plant where the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the reduced amount is the minimum guarantee amount. When adjusting the order quantity of a processed product by adding it to a processing site that is less than the minimum amount, reduce the order quantity of the processed product in the descending order of the allocation of each processed product at the processing site where the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount. It is possible to reduce the average amount from each processing plant where the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount by reducing the guarantee amount, and add the reduced amount to the processing plant where the payment amount is less than the minimum guarantee amount to secure the minimum guarantee amount You can do it.
[0011]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the commissioned processing ordering system according to the present invention will be specifically described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows the configuration of a control system of a commissioned machining ordering system according to the present invention, and also shows how an order is received between a machining orderer and a machining shop using the commissioned machining ordering system. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a procedure for using the commissioned machining ordering system according to the present invention, FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a balance between an order plan for a processed product and a shipping plan for inventory, and FIG. 4 is a list of order information for each processed product to each processing plant. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing how the commissioned processing ordering system according to the present invention automatically allocates the order quantity of the processed product to each processing site. FIG. 6 is an example of a setting screen for setting the order of priority of the ordering conditions. FIG.
[0012]
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing how the order quantity of the processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site on the condition that the processed product is continuously ordered at the processing site. FIG. Is a flowchart showing how the order quantity of the processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site with the ordering condition specified as the ordering condition of the processing site. FIG. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing how the order quantity is automatically allocated. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing how the past order results are automatically allocated to each processing plant using the past order results as order conditions. FIG. 11 is an order showing the past test order results. FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing how the order quantity of processed products is automatically allocated to each processing site as a condition. FIG. Is a flowchart illustrating how the automatic allocation.
[0013]
FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing how the order quantity of the processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site while securing the minimum guarantee amount for the specific processing site. FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the state where the minimum guarantee amount for the specific processing site is secured. FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a state in which the order quantity of processed products is automatically allocated to each processing plant, and FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an example of a commissioned processing order plan presented to the processing plant.
[0014]
In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes an example of a processed product, which is an outsourced processing order of an apparel maker or the like who performs outsourcing processing of a greige machine (kibata) before dyeing a color in a fabric (flap) which is a woven fabric. And 2 is a processing plant for processing a greige machine as a processed product.
[0015]
The control system 4 having a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and a consignment order database (hereinafter referred to as a consignment order DB) are provided in the computer system unit 3 of the consignment processing orderer 1 or a separately provided management center. ) 5, a raw material database (hereinafter, referred to as “raw material DB”) 6, an in-process inventory database (hereinafter, referred to as “in-process inventory DB”) 7, and the like.
[0016]
The computer system unit 3 can be accessed using a personal computer (hereinafter, referred to as “PC”) 8 using a communication network such as the Internet 9.
[0017]
A plurality of processing plants 2 are registered in the consignment order DB 5, and the production results of each of the processing plants 2 are further stored. The control unit 4 is configured to function as a production result comparison unit that compares the production results of each processing site 2 stored in the consignment order DB 5.
[0018]
Further, the control unit 4 also serves as a guarantee amount comparing unit that compares the minimum guarantee amount for each processing site 2 with the payment amount obtained by multiplying the order quantity of the greige machine to be processed in each processing site 2 by the unit price of the greige machine. It is configured to work.
[0019]
Further, when the payment amount to each processing plant 2 falls below the minimum guarantee amount, the control unit 4 orders the greige machine to be processed so that the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount to the processing plant 2. It is configured to also function as an order quantity changing means for changing the quantity.
[0020]
In the control unit 4, a tight brand master 10 (see FIG. 5) in which the brands of the greige machines to be processed and the processing sites 2 that exclusively process the brands are associated with each other. Quality trouble master (not shown) that stores quality trouble information, a distribution condition master (not shown) in which the ratio of commissioned processing orders to each processing plant 2 is preset for each brand of greige machine, and processing machines that each processing plant 2 possesses An order quantity distribution master 14 (see FIG. 12) for allocating the order quantity to each processing plant 2 according to the distribution model stored in the distribution model master and the owned model master (not shown) storing the type and the number of products.
[0021]
The tight brand master 10, the quality trouble master, the apportioning condition master, the owned model master, and the order quantity distribution master 14 are databases serving as storage means for storing brand information associated with the processing plant 2 and quality trouble information of each processing plant 2. Also serves as.
[0022]
Further, the apportioning condition master and the order quantity distribution master 14 also serve as an order quantity setting means for setting the order quantity of the greige machine to be processed according to the ratio of the production results at each processing site.
[0023]
Next, referring to FIG. 1 to FIG. 15, a description will be given of how a commissioned machining order is placed for a plurality of processing sites 2 using the commissioned machining order system according to the present invention. Step S in FIG. ₁ First, the commissioned processing orderer 1 clicks the past reference button 15a on the platform simulation screen 15 shown in FIG. 4 to refer to the previous commissioned ordering plan and the current processed product inventory amount.
[0024]
Then, step S in FIG. ₂ In the step S ₁ Based on the previous consignment ordering plan referred to in the above and the current processed product inventory amount, the consignment processing ordering quantity of the greige machine to be the processed product is stored in the monthly total receiving columns 16a and 16b of the shipping plan balance screen 16 shown in FIG. input.
[0025]
Next, step S in FIG. ₃ When the greed machine request button 15b on the placement simulation screen 15 shown in FIG. 4 is clicked, each salesperson who is the commissioned processing orderer 1 enters the monthly total receiving columns 16a and 16b on the shipping plan balance screen 16 shown in FIG. The input amounts of the required greige machines are totaled, and the required greige amounts of the respective machine shops, which are the respective processing sites 2, are displayed in the greige machine request column 15c of the platform placement simulation screen 15 in FIG.
[0026]
And step S ₄ In the step S ₃ With reference to the greed machine required amount for each machine factory and the previous commissioned machining order planned quantity stored in the commissioned order DB 5, the current commissioned machining order planned quantity is confirmed and corrected as necessary.
[0027]
Further, step S ₅ In the above, the receipt / payment confirmation data of the greige stock is output, and the previous and current commissioned processing order planned quantities are compared and confirmed. Step S ₆ Is a routine for automatically allocating the commissioned processing order quantity to each processing plant 2, and is shown in detail in FIG.
[0028]
Step S in FIG. ₂₁ In FIG. 4, clicking on the green machine request button 15b on the platform simulation screen 15 shown in FIG. Next, step S ₂₂ In, based on the raw material inventory information stored in the raw material DB 6, the control unit 4 checks the necessary raw material inventory in accordance with the aggregated required amount of green machinery.
[0029]
Step S ₂₂ In step S, if it is determined that the necessary raw materials are sufficient and it can be shipped. ₂₃ Proceed to. Step S ₂₂ In the case where it is determined that the stock of necessary raw materials is insufficient, sorting is performed in the order of the quantity of ordered raw materials with the shortage of raw materials other than tight products that have already been ordered based on the tight product information stored in the tight brand master 10. Then, a correction is made to reduce the order quantity in descending order of the order quantity and transfer the greed machine required quantity in the next month (step S). ₂₄ ).
[0030]
And step S ₂₅ In step, it is determined whether or not the raw material falls within the production limit of the greige machine, and step S is performed until the raw material falls within the production limit of the greige machine. ₂₄ , S ₂₅ repeat. Step S ₂₅ In step S, if it is determined that the raw material is within the production limit of the greige machine, ₂₂ Return to
[0031]
Step S ₂₃ Then, the setting order of the commissioned machining order plan is set using the order planning order setting screen 17 shown in FIG. Here, processing contents include (1) continuous ordering, (2) processing site 2 is designated, (3) setting of the previous ordering plan, and (4) past ordering results. There are conditions such as (5) that there is a past record of test ordering in the past, and (6) that the company has a processing machine and is a new entrant. ₂₆ In the above, the processing contents (1) to (6) are appropriately selected, and the priority of the processing contents is input in the priority order column 17a. The point of performing a calculation process to secure the minimum guaranteed amount is pointed out.
[0032]
Then, after setting the processing content and the priority order, when the execution button 17c on the order planning order setting screen 17 is clicked, the step S ₂₇ Proceed to. Step S ₂₇ Then, among the processing contents (1) to (6) shown in FIGS. 7 to 12, the processing contents set in the priority order column 17a of the order planning order setting screen 17 are sequentially executed in accordance with the priority order.
[0033]
In the continuous order setting routine (processing content (1)) shown in FIG. ₄₁ In step S5, the results of ordering to each processing plant 2 stored in the consignment ordering DB 5 are read, and ₄₂ In, it is determined whether or not there is an order for the processed product that has been continued last month.
[0034]
Step S ₄₂ In the case where there is an order for the processed product in the previous month for the processed product that has been continued, the quantity of the processed product in the previous month is adopted and step S is performed. ₄₃ , The commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2. Step S ₄₂ In, if there is no order for the processed product that has been continued in the previous month, it is output as no setting.
[0035]
Next, step S ₄₄ In, the quality trouble is checked based on the past quality trouble information of each processing plant 2 stored in the quality trouble master for each processing plant 2 for which the commissioned processing order quantity is set. The processing site 2 where a quality problem has occurred in the past is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0036]
Processing site 2 where there was no quality trouble, step S ₄₅ In the same manner, the commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2 by adopting the quantity of the processed products of the previous month. ₄₆ In, based on the apportioning condition information of the apportioning condition master in which the ratio is determined for each processing plant 2 for each brand in advance, it is determined whether or not the apportioning rate of each processing plant 2 is set.
[0037]
For processing site 2 for which the apportionment rate is set, step S ₄₇ In step (1), the quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the apportionment rate is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2. Step S ₄₆ For processing plant 2 for which the apportioning rate is not set, the quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the value obtained by dividing the previous month's order quantity for each processing factory 2 by the previous month's total order quantity Is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2 (step S ₄₈ ).
[0038]
In the production processing plant designation routine (processing content (2)) shown in FIG. ₅₁ In step S5, the information on the designation of the production processing plant to each processing plant 2 stored in the consignment order DB 5 is read. ₅₂ In, it is determined whether or not there is a processing plant 2 in which a specific brand is designated based on quality results or the like.
[0039]
Step S ₅₂ If there is no processing plant 2 in which a specific brand is designated, it is output as no setting. Step S ₅₂ If there is a processing plant 2 in which a specific brand is designated, step S ₅₃ , The quality trouble is checked based on the past quality trouble information of each processing plant 2 stored in the quality trouble master for the processing plant 2. The processing site 2 where a quality problem has occurred in the past is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0040]
Processing site 2 where there was no quality trouble, step S ₅₄ , The commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2 by using the quantity of processed products in the previous month, and ₅₅ In the above, based on the apportioning condition information of the apportioning condition master in which the ratio is determined in advance for each processing plant 2 for each brand, it is determined whether or not the apportioning ratio of each processing plant 2 is set, and the apportioning ratio is set. For the processing plant 2, a quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the apportionment rate is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2. Step S ₅₅ Is set to "0" and output to the processing site 2 for which the apportioning rate is not set.
[0041]
In the previous order plan setting routine (processing content (3)) shown in FIG. ₆₁ In step S5, order planning information for each processing plant 2 stored in the consignment ordering DB 5 is read, and ₆₂ , It is determined whether or not there is a consignment order plan for the current month for each processed product in the previous plan.
[0042]
Step S ₆₂ Then, if there is an order plan for the current month for each processed product in the previous plan, the quantity of processed products for the current month that was previously planned is adopted and step S is performed. ₆₃ , The commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2. Step S ₆₂ In the previous plan, if there is no order plan for the current month in the previous plan, it is output as no setting.
[0043]
Next, step S ₆₄ In, the quality trouble is checked based on the past quality trouble information of each processing plant 2 stored in the quality trouble master for each processing plant 2 for which the commissioned processing order quantity is set. The processing site 2 where a quality problem has occurred in the past is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0044]
Processing site 2 where there was no quality trouble, step S ₆₅ In the same manner, the commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing station 2 by adopting the quantity of processed products for the current month that was also planned last time, and ₆₆ In, based on the apportioning condition information of the apportioning condition master in which the ratio is determined for each processing plant 2 for each brand in advance, it is determined whether or not the apportioning rate of each processing plant 2 is set.
[0045]
For processing site 2 for which the apportionment rate is set, step S ₆₇ In step (1), the quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the apportionment rate is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2. Step S ₆₆ For the processing plant 2 for which the apportionment rate is not set, the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product was multiplied by the value obtained by dividing the previous month's planned order quantity for each processing factory 2 by the total order quantity for the previous month. The quantity is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2 (step S ₆₈ ).
[0046]
In the order result setting routine (processing content (4)) shown in FIG. ₇₁ In step S5, the past order results for each processing plant 2 stored in the consignment order DB 5 are read, and ₇₂ It is determined whether or not there is an order record for a specific processed product by going back a predetermined period in the past.
[0047]
Step S ₇₂ Then, for a processed product for which an order has been placed within a predetermined period in the past, the quantity of the processed product in the latest month is adopted and step S ₇₃ , The commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2. Step S ₇₂ In the above, a processed product having no order record within a predetermined period in the past is output as no setting.
[0048]
Next, step S ₇₄ In, the quality trouble is checked based on the past quality trouble information of each processing plant 2 stored in the quality trouble master for each processing plant 2 for which the commissioned processing order quantity is set. The processing site 2 where a quality problem has occurred in the past is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0049]
Processing site 2 where there was no quality trouble, step S ₇₅ In the same manner, for a processed product having an order record within a predetermined period in the past, the commissioned processing ordered quantity is set for each processing plant 2 by adopting the quantity of the processed product in the latest month. ₇₆ In, based on the apportioning condition information of the apportioning condition master in which the ratio is determined for each processing plant 2 for each brand in advance, it is determined whether or not the apportioning rate of each processing plant 2 is set.
[0050]
For processing site 2 for which the apportionment rate is set, step S ₇₇ In step (1), the quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the apportionment rate is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2. Step S ₇₆ For the processing plant 2 for which the apportioning rate is not set in the above, the total order quantity of each processed product brand is added to the latest The number obtained by multiplying the order quantity of the processed product for the month by the total order quantity for the month is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2 (step S). ₇₈ ).
[0051]
In the test ordering result setting routine (processing content (5)) shown in FIG. ₈₁ In step S5, the past test order results for each processing plant 2 stored in the consignment order DB 5 are read, and ₈₂ It is determined whether or not there is a test order record for the processed product going back a predetermined period in the past.
[0052]
Step S ₈₂ Then, for a processed product having a test order record within a predetermined period in the past, the test order quantity of the processed product in the latest month is adopted and step S ₈₃ , The commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2. Step S ₈₂ In the above, a processed product for which there is no actual test order within a predetermined period in the past is output as no setting.
[0053]
Next, step S ₈₄ In, the quality trouble is checked based on the past quality trouble information of each processing plant 2 stored in the quality trouble master for each processing plant 2 for which the commissioned processing order quantity is set. The processing site 2 where a quality problem has occurred in the past is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0054]
Processing site 2 where there was no quality trouble, step S ₈₅ In the same way, for a processed product having a test order record within a predetermined period in the past, the commissioned processing order quantity is set for each processing plant 2 by using the test order quantity of the processed product for the latest month, and ₈₆ In, based on the apportioning condition information of the apportioning condition master in which the ratio is determined for each processing plant 2 for each brand in advance, it is determined whether or not the apportioning rate of each processing plant 2 is set.
[0055]
For processing site 2 for which the apportionment rate is set, step S ₈₇ In step (1), the quantity obtained by multiplying the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product by the apportionment rate is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2. Step S ₈₆ For the processing plant 2 for which the apportioning rate is not set in the above, the total order quantity for each brand of each processed product is The quantity obtained by multiplying the test order quantity of the processed product of the latest month by the total order quantity of the month is output as the commissioned processing order quantity for each processing plant 2 (step S). ₈₈ ).
[0056]
In the new model setting routine (processing content (6)) shown in FIG. 12, a new processing plant 2 which has a processing capability but has not yet been ordered can be involved in the ordering plan. The new processing plant 2 that has accessed the system unit 3 registers the unique information such as the owned models and the number thereof in the owned model master. Then, the commissioned processing orderer 1 examines the registered contents, and if it meets predetermined conditions, performs approval registration.
[0057]
And step S ₁₀₁ , It is determined whether or not the loom for processing a product to be ordered is held based on the held model information stored in the held model master. If the loom is owned, step S ₁₀₂ It is determined whether or not there is an approval registration of the ordering target, and the ordering quantity distribution master 14 serving as an ordering quantity setting means for setting the ordering quantity of the processed product in accordance with the ratio of the production results of each processing plant 2 to each processing. The order quantity is allocated to the place 2 (step S ₁₀₃ ~ S ₁₀₆ ).
[0058]
Step S ₁₀₁ , S ₁₀₂ In the above, the processing plant 2 that does not have the corresponding loom or is not registered for approval for the ordering target is excluded, and is output as no setting.
[0059]
The order quantity distribution master 14 designates the order of priority by performing predetermined weighting on the total cost of the construction cost, the raw material stock quantity of each processing plant 2 and the proximity (transportation cost) of the processing plant 2.
[0060]
For example, step S ₁₀₃ In this example, sorting is performed in ascending order of the total amount of construction cost paid, and points are weighted by assigning scores such as “10000”, “9000”, “8000”,. Step S ₁₀₄ In this example, sorting is performed in descending order of the stocked material stock, and weights are assigned by assigning scores such as “1000”, “900”, “800”,. Step S ₁₀₅ In this example, sorting is performed in ascending order of the transport cost separation distance to the processing site 2, and scores are assigned and weighted in the order of decreasing distance, such as “100”, “90”, “80”,. .
[0061]
Here, step S ₁₀₃ And the total cost of construction is the cheapest, step S ₁₀₄ Therefore, in the new processing plant 2 having the second largest stock of raw materials and the third separation distance in terms of transportation cost, “10980” is recorded as the score. Then, the priority of the new processing plant 2 is set in the descending order of the scores.
[0062]
And step S ₁₀₆ , The total order quantity for each brand of each processed product multiplied by the value obtained by dividing the weighted score for each processing plant 2 by the sum of the scores for all processing plants 2, and outsourced processing for each processing plant 2 Output as order quantity.
[0063]
7 to 12, the commissioned processing order quantity set for each processing plant 2 is lower than the minimum order quantity (for example, 100 pieces) set in consideration of transportation costs, processing efficiency, and the like. In that case, the commissioned processing order will be postponed.
[0064]
Then, step S in FIG. ₂₆ , After the processing contents (1) to (6) shown in FIG. 7 to FIG. ₂₇ In, it is determined whether there is no error. If there is no error, step S ₂₈ Then, it is determined whether or not to perform processing for setting the minimum guarantee amount for each processing site 2. Step S ₂₇ If there is an error in step S ₃₄ After proceeding to step S ₂₆ Then, the selection of the processing contents (1) to (6) and the priority order are appropriately changed.
[0065]
Step S ₂₈ In the case where there is a check for setting the minimum guarantee amount in the minimum guarantee check column 17b on the order planning order setting screen 17 shown in FIG. ₂₉ The processing for setting the minimum guarantee amount for each processing site 2 is performed.
[0066]
FIG. 13 is a flowchart of a process for setting a minimum guarantee amount for each processing site 2. In FIG. 13, the minimum guarantee quantity master and the minimum guarantee amount master (not shown) which are the guarantee amount setting means for setting the minimum guarantee amount for each processing plant 2 are storage means in which preset minimum guarantee amount information is stored. A database is provided.
[0067]
And step S ₁₁₁ In the above, based on the minimum guaranteed amount master and the minimum guaranteed amount information stored in the minimum guaranteed amount master, it is determined whether or not the minimum guaranteed amount ordered for each processing plant 2 is within a set range.
[0068]
At this time, the minimum guaranteed amount of each processing plant 2 set by the minimum guaranteed quantity master and the minimum guaranteed amount master, which are the guaranteed amount setting means, and the order quantity setting means such as the distribution condition master and the order quantity distribution master 14 are set. The payment amount obtained by multiplying the order quantity of the processed product at each processing plant 2 by the unit price of the processed product is compared by the control unit 4 which also serves as a guarantee amount comparing means, and the minimum guaranteed amount to be ordered for each processing plant 2 is set. It is determined whether it is within the range.
[0069]
If the payment amount obtained by multiplying the order quantity of the processed product to be ordered for each processing plant 2 by the unit price of the processed product exceeds the minimum guaranteed value for all the processing plants 2 for which the minimum guaranteed amount is set, The order quantity is output, but if the payment is less than the minimum guarantee, step S ₁₁₂ In the processing plant 2 in which the payment amount is less than the minimum guarantee amount, the sorting is performed in the descending order of the difference between the payment amount and the minimum guarantee amount.
[0070]
For example, as shown in FIG. 14, the minimum guaranteed amount is set at “1000” for the processing site A and the processing site B, and the minimum guaranteed amount is set at “2000” for the processing site C. The minimum guarantee amount is set at “3000” in the place D, and the minimum guarantee amount is not set in the processing places E and F.
[0071]
The amounts allocated to the processing sites A to F by the primary allocation process in step S26 shown in FIG. 5 are “1900”, “100”, “3000”, “2000”, “1500”, and “2000”. Each is set.
[0072]
In FIG. 14, the payment amount of the processing site A and the processing site C exceeds the minimum guaranteed amount, but the payment amount of the processing site B and the processing site D is lower than the minimum guaranteed amount. Looking at the increase / decrease, processing site A is “+900”, processing site B is “−900”, processing site C is “+1000”, processing site D is “−1000”, processing site E is “+1500”, and processing is The place F is “+2000”, and the sum of increase and decrease of all the processing places A to F is “+5400”.
[0073]
Here, the cut-off amount ratio of each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F that exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the increase of each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F is the sum of the increase and decrease of all the processing sites A to F. +5400 ". The ratio of the cut-off amount of each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F is 0.166667 (= 900/5400) in the processing site A, 0.185185 (= 1000/5400) in the processing site C, and 0. 277778 (= 1500/5400) and the processing site F are set to 0.37037 (= 2000/5400).
[0074]
On the basis of this cut-off amount ratio, the cut-off amount from each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F is cut off, and the reference amount to be compensated for the processing site B and the processing site D whose payment amount is less than the minimum guarantee amount is each processing site B. , Is calculated by multiplying the reduced amount of the processing plant D by the cut-off amount ratio.
[0075]
Processing sites A, C, E, and F supplement processing site D with reference amounts 170 (= 1000 × 0.166667) for processing site A, 190 (= 1000 × 0.185185) for processing site C, and processing sites. E is set to 280 (= 1000 × 0.277778), and the processing site F is set to 370 (= 1000 × 0.37037).
[0076]
In addition, the processing amount of each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F compensates for the processing site B. The processing amount of the processing site A is 150 (= 900 × 0.166667), the processing site C is 170 (= 900 × 0.185185), The processing site E is set to 250 (= 900 × 0.277778), and the processing site F is set to 330 (= 900 × 0.37037).
[0077]
Then, the sum of the reference amounts that the processing sites A, C, E, and F supplement the processing sites B and D is 320 (= 170 + 150) for the processing site A, 360 (= 190 + 170) for the processing site C, and the processing site E 530 (= 280 + 250), the processing site F becomes 700 (= 370 + 330), and the cut-out priority is set in descending order of the total of the supplementary reference amounts. That is, in FIG. 14, the processing site F is set to the first order, the processing site E is set to the second order, the processing site C is set to the third order, and the processing site A is set to the fourth order. .
[0078]
Next, step S ₁₁₃ , It is determined whether or not the apportionment condition of the processed product corresponding to the apportioning condition master has been registered. ₁₁₄ In the above, the sorting is performed in the order of larger apportioning rate (in order of larger quantity) based on apportioning condition information stored in the apportioning condition master.
[0079]
And step S ₁₁₅ In the above, the control unit 4, which also serves as an order quantity changing means, determines, in the processing plant 2 in which the payment amount is less than the minimum guarantee amount, the order in which the guaranteed crack amount obtained by subtracting the payment amount from the minimum guarantee amount is larger, in descending order. In order to compensate for this, the order quantity of the processed products is reduced by the minimum guaranteed amount in the order of the allocation of each processed product in the processing plant 2 where the payment amount exceeds the minimum guaranteed amount, and the reduced amount is the minimum guaranteed amount The order quantity of the processed product is adjusted by adding it to the processing plant 2 where the amount is less than the amount.
[0080]
For example, in FIG. 14, 300 is assigned to the processing plant D that has the largest reduction from the processing plant F that has become the first priority of the cutting operation, and the processing plant D has been allocated from the processing plant E that has the second priority of the cutting operation. To 280, and from the processing site C, which is the third priority, to the processing site D, 100 is allocated, and from the processing site A, which is the fourth priority, to the processing site D. The processing area D is filled with 780.
[0081]
As a result, the allocation amount of each of the processing sites A to F is reduced to the temporary allocation amount, and the increase / decrease amount is increased / decreased. The processing site A is 1800 (= 1900−100), the processing site B is 100, and the processing site C is 2900 ( = 3000-100), processing site D is set to 2780 (= 2000 + 780), processing site E is set to 1220 (= 1500-280), and processing site F is set to 1700 (= 2000-300).
[0082]
Incidentally, since the processing plant D does not reach the minimum guarantee amount of 3000, 220 is further allocated to the processing plant D from the processing plant E which has a margin for the allocation of the target brand, and the minimum guarantee amount of the processing plant D is 3000 (= 2780 + 220).
[0083]
Next, for the processing site B having the second largest amount of reduction, the correction of the reference amount for supplementing the processing site B from each of the processing sites A to F is performed. Here, the reference amount for supplementing the processing site B is corrected by adding or subtracting the excess or deficiency previously allocated to the processing site D to the reference amount for supplementing the processing site B previously set.
[0084]
The processing amount for the processing site B thus corrected is 220 (= 150 + (170-100)) for the processing site A, 260 (= 170 + (190-100)) for the processing site C, and 30 for the processing site E. (= 250 + (280-280-220)), the processing site F is set to 400 (= 330 + (370-300)), and this amount is set as the cut-off limit of each of the processing sites A, C, E, and F. You. The cut-over priority for processing site B is processed in the same order as the cut-off priority for processing site B described above, processing site F is set to the first priority, processing site E is set to the second priority, and processing site C is set in the third order, and processing site A is set in the fourth order.
[0085]
Then, 400 is allocated to the processing site B from the processing site F which has been the first priority of the cutting and the processing site B is allocated 30 to the processing site B from the processing site E which is the second priority of the cutting and the second priority. The assignment of 260 is performed from the processing plant C, which has the third priority, and the processing plant B is assigned to the processing plant B, and the allocation of 210 from the processing plant A, which is the fourth priority of the cutting operation, to the processing plant B, is performed. Field B is filled with 900.
[0086]
As a result, the allocation amount of each of the processing sites A to F is changed to the allocation amount indicated in the column II-2 by increasing or decreasing the amount of increase and decrease beforehand, and the processing site A is 1590 (= 1800-210), and the processing site B Is 1000 (= 100 + 900), processing site C is 2640 (= 2900-260), processing site D is 3000, processing site E is 970 (= 1000-30), and processing site F is 1300 (= 1700-400). Is done.
[0087]
On the basis of the result of the cut-away allocation processing as described above, step S ₁₁₆ Judge whether the payment amount of all processing plants 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, and the payment amount of all the processing plant 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set is the minimum guarantee amount. Step S until it exceeds the amount ₁₁₅ ~ S ₁₁₆ repeat.
[0088]
Then, if the payment amount of all the processing plants 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount has been set exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the order quantity is output, and step S ₁₁₇ Proceed to. The step S ₁₁₃ Even if the apportioning condition master does not register the apportioning condition of the ₁₁₇ To step S until the cutout layout processing is completed. ₁₁₃ ~ Step S ₁₁₇ repeat.
[0089]
Step S ₁₁₇ When the cutout allocation processing is completed in ₁₁₈ In the processing plant 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set, it is determined whether there is an order plan for the next month based on the order plan information for the next month stored in the consignment order DB 5, and the order plan for the next month exists. Then step S ₁₁₈ Proceed to. If there is no order plan for the next month, it is output that there is no setting.
[0090]
Step S ₁₁₈ , It is determined whether or not there is an order plan for the next month in the processing plant 2 in which the minimum guarantee amount is set, and if there is an order plan for the next month, step S ₁₁₉ Then, a process is performed in which the ordered products are arranged in descending order of the ordered quantity, and the ordered quantity for the next month is increased to the ordered quantity for the current month from the ordered ordered product. Step S ₁₁₈ If there is no order plan for the next month, the set order quantity is output as it is.
[0091]
Step S ₁₁₉ To step S ₁₂₀ To step S ₁₂₀ In step S3, it is determined whether or not the raw material production is within the limit based on the raw material inventory information in the raw material DB6. ₁₁₉ Then, the process of changing the brand of the processed product and raising the order quantity for the next month to the order quantity for this month is performed.
[0092]
Step S ₁₂₀ In the case where it is within the limit of raw material production, step S ₁₂₁ To step S until the payment amount of all processing plants 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set exceeds the minimum guarantee amount. ₁₁₉ ~ S ₁₂₁ Is repeated, and when the payment amount of all the processing sites 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the order quantity is output. Step S ₁₁₉ ~ S ₁₂₁ If the payment amount of the processing plant 2 for which the minimum guarantee amount is set is less than the minimum guarantee amount even if the above is repeated, it is output as no setting.
[0093]
Step S shown in FIG. ₂₈ ~ S ₃₀ Is repeated, and step S ₃₀ When the payment amount of the processing plant 2 in which the minimum guarantee amount is set exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the processing is terminated and the order quantity is output (step S). ₃₁ ).
[0094]
Step S ₃₁ In step (1), the order quantity for each processing plant 2 is confirmed, and if it is not necessary to correct the order quantity, an order plan as shown in FIG.
[0095]
At each processing plant 2, the order plan screen 18 shown in FIG. 15 is opened using the personal computer 8 or the like as a terminal device, and the brand, quantity, unit price, delivery date, etc. of the processed product are confirmed, and a response of approval or denial is made. It is returned to the commissioned processing orderer 1 via the Internet 9.
[0096]
Step S ₃₂ In step 2, if the processing plant 2 accepts the contents of the order plan, a formal order is created (step S ₃₃ ), And send it to the processing plant 2, and the processing plant 2 answers the delivery date based on the order form.
[0097]
Step S ₃₂ In the case where the processing site 2 returns a response to the effect that it cannot be accepted for some reason, the rejected portion is regarded as an undetermined portion and the process returns to step S ₂₃ And returns to step S ₂₃ ~ S ₃₁ repeat.
[0098]
The step S ₃₁ In the above, if it is necessary to confirm the order quantity for each processing plant 2 and correct it, the part to be denied is set as an unconfirmed part and the step S ₂₃ And returns to step S ₂₃ ~ S ₃₁ repeat.
[0099]
In the above-described embodiment, an example of a case where the present invention is applied to a consignment processing order in a case where the yarn is processed into a fabric such as a greige machine has been described. However, a consignment processing order in a case where the yarn is processed into a dyed processed yarn, or The present invention can be widely applied to a consignment processing order for dyeing a greige machine, a consignment processing order for sewing a greige machine, or a consignment processing order for consigning various processed products to an in-house worker.
[0100]
【The invention's effect】
Since the present invention has the above-described configuration and operation, it is possible to easily assign orders to a plurality of processing sites while adjusting the minimum stock amount while guaranteeing the minimum guarantee amount. Processing order system can be provided.
[0101]
That is, first, the order quantity setting means sets the order quantity of the processed product in accordance with the ratio of the production results of each processing plant, and the payment amount obtained by multiplying the order quantity by the unit price of the processed product, and the minimum guarantee for the processing plant. If the payment amount falls below the minimum guarantee amount, the order quantity of the processed product is changed by the order quantity change means so that the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, and the minimum guarantee for each processing plant Orders can be easily allocated to a plurality of processing sites while guaranteeing the amount and adjusting the inventory amount to the minimum necessary amount.
[0102]
In addition, the order quantity changing means uses the payment amount to compensate for the broken amount of guarantee, in the order of the largest broken amount of the minimum guaranteed amount minus the paid amount among the processing plants where the paid amount is less than the minimum guaranteed amount. , Reduce the order quantity of the processed products by the minimum guaranteed amount in the order of allocation of each processed product at the processing plant that exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, and add the reduced amount to the processing plant where the payment amount is less than the minimum guaranteed amount In order to adjust the order quantity of processed products, the payment amount is reduced by the minimum guaranteed amount in the order of the allocation of each processed product in the processing plant where the payment amount exceeds the minimum guaranteed amount by the minimum guaranteed amount. It is possible to reduce the weight on average from each processing plant that exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, and to add the reduced amount to the processing plant where the payment amount is less than the minimum guarantee amount to secure the minimum guarantee amount.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a control system of a commissioned machining ordering system according to the present invention, and showing how an order is received between a machining orderer and a machining shop using the commissioned machining ordering system.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a procedure for using the commissioned processing ordering system according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a balance between an order plan for processed products and a shipping plan for inventory.
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a list of order information of each processed product to each processing site.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing how a commissioned processing order system according to the present invention automatically allocates an order quantity of a processed product to each processing site.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a setting screen for setting the order of priority of order conditions.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of the processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site on the condition that the processed product is continuously ordered at the processing site.
FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically assigned to each processing site on the condition that a specific processed product is designated as a specific processing site.
FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site on the basis of the last allocation.
FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site using past order results as order conditions.
FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site using past test order results as order conditions.
FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a process of approving a new processing site and automatically allocating the order quantity of a processed product to each processing site.
FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site while securing a minimum guarantee amount for a specific processing site.
FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a state in which the order quantity of a processed product is automatically allocated to each processing site while securing a minimum guarantee amount for a specific processing site.
FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a commissioned processing order plan document presented to the processing site.
[Explanation of symbols]
1 ... Contract processing orderer
2 ... Processing shop
3. Computer system section
4 ... Control unit
5: Consignment order DB
6. Raw material DB
7: In-process inventory DB
8 ... PC
9. Internet
10. Tight brand master
14… Order quantity distribution master
15: Distribution platform simulation screen
15a ... Past reference button
15b… Green machine request button
15c ... Green machine request column
16: Shipment plan balance screen
16a, 16b ... Reception total column
17… Order planning order setting screen
17a ... priority order column
17b: Minimum compensation check column
17c… Execute button
18… Order plan screen

Claims (2)

It is a system for outsourcing processing orders to multiple processing sites,
Storage means for storing the production results of each of the plurality of processing sites;
A production performance comparison means for comparing the production performance of each processing site stored in the storage means,
Order quantity setting means for setting the order quantity of the processed product according to the ratio of the production results of each processing plant compared by the production result comparison means,
Guarantee amount setting means for setting a minimum guarantee amount for each processing site,
Guarantee comparing the minimum guarantee amount of each processing plant set by the guarantee amount setting means with the payment amount obtained by multiplying the order quantity of the processed product of each processing plant set by the order quantity setting device by the unit price of the processed product. Amount comparison means,
Order quantity changing means for changing the order quantity of the processed product such that the payment amount exceeds the minimum guarantee amount when the payment amount compared by the guarantee amount comparison means is lower than the minimum guarantee amount;
A consignment processing ordering system characterized by having: The order quantity changing means includes:
Among the processing plants where the payment amount is lower than the minimum guarantee amount, in order of increasing the guaranteed crack amount obtained by subtracting the payment amount from the minimum guarantee amount, in order to compensate for the guaranteed crack amount, the payment amount is the minimum amount. Reduce the order quantity of the processed products by the minimum guaranteed amount in the order of the larger allocation of each processed product of the processing plant exceeding the guaranteed amount, and add the reduced amount to the processing plant where the payment amount is less than the minimum guaranteed amount. 2. The commissioned processing order system according to claim 1, wherein the order quantity of the processed product is adjusted by adjusting the order amount.

Images