JPH01177334A - Manufacture of ferroboron - Google Patents

Manufacture of ferroboron

Info

Publication number
JPH01177334A
JPH01177334A JP33686087A JP33686087A JPH01177334A JP H01177334 A JPH01177334 A JP H01177334A JP 33686087 A JP33686087 A JP 33686087A JP 33686087 A JP33686087 A JP 33686087A JP H01177334 A JPH01177334 A JP H01177334A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
furnace
boron
ferroboron
amount
yield
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP33686087A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Junichi Saga
佐賀 淳一
Toshio Kamaya
釜谷 俊夫
Hiromasa Komatsu
小松 弘昌
Toshiaki Ishida
石田 寿秋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Engineering Corp
Original Assignee
NKK Corp
Nippon Kokan Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NKK Corp, Nippon Kokan Ltd filed Critical NKK Corp
Priority to JP33686087A priority Critical patent/JPH01177334A/en
Publication of JPH01177334A publication Critical patent/JPH01177334A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To increase the yield of boron and to reduce the consumption of unit electric power by specifying the amounts of a carbonaceous material for the reduction of boron source and manufacturing ferroboron by an electric method in the use of a DC girod furnace provided with specific size of basined layer under a tapping spout. CONSTITUTION:At the time of manufacturing ferroboron by an electric furnace method, the DC girod furnace provided with the basin having 100-500mm depth under the tapping spout as an electric furnace. In this way, the floating and discharging of B4C are smoothly executed and its accumulation is simultaneously prevented. The amounts of the carbonaceous material reducing the boron source such as boron oxide and boric acid are furthermore regulated to 91-100% for the theoretical required amounts. By this method, the yield of boron is increased and the generation of the substance difficult to melt is furthermore suppressed to permit the stabilizing operation and to reduce the consumption of electric power per unit weight of a manufacture.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 [産業上の利用分野] この発明は電気炉法によるフェロボロンの製造方法に関
するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Industrial Field of Application] The present invention relates to a method for producing ferroboron using an electric furnace method.

[従来技術] 近年アモルファス合金特にFe−B−3i系のアモルフ
ァス合金がトランス用鉄心として注目を浴びており、そ
のボロン源としてフェロボロンが用いられている。この
フェロボロンの安価な製造法として電気炉炭素還元法が
行われている。
[Prior Art] In recent years, amorphous alloys, particularly Fe-B-3i-based amorphous alloys, have attracted attention as iron cores for transformers, and ferroboron is used as the boron source. An electric furnace carbon reduction method is used as an inexpensive method for producing ferroboron.

電気炉法によるフェロボロンの製造方法に関する従来技
術としては特公昭34−9108、 特 公 昭40−
18841、特公昭51−37613、特公昭60−1
03151があるが、これらの方法ではいずれも長期に
わたっての安定操業が困難であること、またボロン収率
が低いことなどの問題があり、満足すべき方法ではない
Prior art related to the method for producing ferroboron using an electric furnace method is disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 9108-1983 and Japanese Patent Publication No. 1973-1989.
18841, Special Publication No. 51-37613, Special Publication No. 60-1
03151, but all of these methods have problems such as difficulty in stable operation over a long period of time and low boron yield, and are not satisfactory methods.

すなわち特公昭34−9108の方法は鉄および酸化硼
素、硼酸等の硼素化合物ならびに木炭、コークス等の炭
素質の物質を5メツシユ以下の粉末とし、かつ炭素質還
元材の量を、原料中の酸素を還元するのに必要な量に対
して過剰に添加することを特徴としているが、この方法
では還元材の過剰配合により炉内で84C等の難溶性物
質が生成し、これが炉床部に堆積し炉床が上昇するため
長期安定操業が不可能である。
In other words, the method disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 34-9108 involves powdering iron, boron compounds such as boron oxide and boric acid, and carbonaceous substances such as charcoal and coke into powders of 5 mesh or less, and adjusting the amount of the carbonaceous reducing agent to the oxygen in the raw material. This method is characterized by adding an excessive amount of reducing agent to the amount required to reduce the reducing agent. However, in this method, the excessive addition of reducing agent generates poorly soluble substances such as 84C in the furnace, which accumulates on the hearth. As the hearth rises, long-term stable operation is impossible.

公開40−18841は鉄源として鉄鉱石を用い、炭素
量をその脱酸素に要する理論値より少なくすることによ
って易溶性のスラグを副生し、さらに、硼素化合物が溶
融して他の原料と分離することを防止するため、原料を
全て5mm以下に粉砕し、少量の水を加えて混合し20
0℃に加熱した後電気炉に投入することを特徴としてい
る。しかしながら、本方法では原料の事前処理が必要で
あり、この処理費がかかることの他、炉内でスラグを生
成させるためにボロンのスラグへの損失が避けられず、
炭材配合率も理論必要量の50X以下と極めて小さいの
でボロンの高収率は期待出来ない、また還元反応は固−
液反応となり、固−固反応に比べて反応速度が低下し、
単位製品重量当たりの消費電力が高くなることも明らか
で、工業生産に適した技術とはいい難い。
Publication No. 40-18841 uses iron ore as an iron source, and by reducing the amount of carbon to less than the theoretical value required for deoxidizing it, easily soluble slag is produced as a by-product, and furthermore, boron compounds are melted and separated from other raw materials. In order to prevent this, all raw materials were ground to 5 mm or less, mixed with a small amount of water, and mixed for 20 minutes.
It is characterized in that it is heated to 0°C and then put into an electric furnace. However, this method requires pre-treatment of the raw material, which incurs processing costs, and the loss of boron to the slag is unavoidable due to the production of slag in the furnace.
The carbon content is extremely small, less than the theoretically required amount of 50X, so a high yield of boron cannot be expected, and the reduction reaction is solid.
It becomes a liquid reaction, and the reaction rate is lower than that of a solid-solid reaction.
It is also clear that power consumption per unit product weight increases, so it is difficult to say that this technology is suitable for industrial production.

特公昭51−37613の方法は炉床部での難溶性物質
の堆積を防止するため、原料中に石灰分を配合すること
を提唱しているが、硼酸は炉内で石灰分と容易にスラグ
を生成するので、ボロンのスラグへの損失は避けらす、
又生成するスラグの顕熱による単位製品重量当たりの消
費電力の増加も避けられない。
The method of Japanese Patent Publication No. 51-37613 proposes adding lime to the raw materials in order to prevent the accumulation of poorly soluble substances in the hearth, but boric acid easily slags with lime in the furnace. , thus avoiding the loss of boron to the slag,
Furthermore, an increase in power consumption per unit product weight due to the sensible heat of the generated slag is unavoidable.

特公昭60−103151は炉床部に生成する難溶性の
堆積物を積極的に利用しようとしたもので、操業開始時
に反応性不良の還元材を主体とする操業により難溶性の
堆積物を生成せしめ、そのあと炉底が適正温度に至った
ところで木炭を主体とする反応性良好な還元材を理論必
要量の90%以下の弱還元性操業に転換することにより
難溶性の堆積物の成長を抑制して適正な層厚を保持する
ことにより長期安定操業を可能とし、併せてTi、A1
等の不純物の低い高純度製品が得られるとしている。
Special Publication No. 60-103151 was an attempt to make active use of the poorly soluble deposits that form in the hearth. After that, when the bottom of the furnace reaches the appropriate temperature, the highly reactive reducing agent, mainly charcoal, is switched to a weakly reducing operation using less than 90% of the theoretically required amount to prevent the growth of refractory deposits. By suppressing the layer thickness and maintaining an appropriate layer thickness, long-term stable operation is possible, and at the same time, Ti, A1
It is said that high-purity products with low impurities such as

しかしながら、この方法はこの特許発明者も述べている
通り、難溶性堆積物は一定の堆積量を越えるとその成長
を抑制することは困難で、その消長をコントロールする
こととは容易ではない、加えて堆積層上で弱還元性操業
を行えば、炉内は還元材の不足から硼素源が低融点のス
ラグとなって炉内温度が下がり、ボロン収率の低下、消
費電力の増加となる。また、熱不足による反応不良から
、むしろ難溶性物質を増加させる虞がある。このような
本方法によって 長期の安定操業が困難であることは明
らかである。また、弱還元操業では電極の炭素分が加炭
され易く電極消耗量が大幅に増加してコストを高めるの
で有利な操業法とはいえない。
However, as the inventor of this patent has stated, it is difficult to suppress the growth of poorly soluble deposits once they exceed a certain amount of deposits, and it is not easy to control their evolution. If weak reducing operation is performed on the deposited layer, the boron source in the furnace becomes low melting point slag due to the lack of reducing agent in the furnace, which lowers the temperature inside the furnace, resulting in a decrease in boron yield and an increase in power consumption. In addition, there is a possibility that the amount of poorly soluble substances may increase due to poor reaction due to insufficient heat. It is clear that long-term stable operation is difficult with this method. In addition, in weak reduction operation, the carbon content of the electrode is likely to be carburized, and the amount of electrode consumption increases significantly, increasing costs, so it cannot be said to be an advantageous operation method.

[発明が解決しようとする問題点コ 前述の通り、従来の電気炉によるフェロボロンの生産は
、炭材を理論値以上に過剰配合すれば炉床部に難溶性物
質の生成、堆積となって安定した操業が不可能となり、
反面、炭材の配合量を必要以上に抑制すれば、金属化率
低下によるボロン収率の低下、製品単位重量当たりの電
力消費量の増加、さらには熱不足となって難溶性物質の
分解反応が起こらず、上記の炭材の過剰配合の場合と同
様に炉床部に難溶性物質を堆積させて不安定な操業にな
るという問題点がある。
[Problems to be solved by the invention] As mentioned above, in the production of ferroboron using conventional electric furnaces, if carbonaceous material is added in excess of the theoretical value, a refractory substance will be generated and deposited on the hearth, making it unstable. operations became impossible,
On the other hand, if the blended amount of carbonaceous material is suppressed more than necessary, the boron yield will decrease due to a decrease in the metallization rate, the power consumption per unit weight of the product will increase, and furthermore, the decomposition reaction of poorly soluble substances will occur due to insufficient heat. However, similar to the case of excessive blending of carbonaceous material, there is a problem that refractory substances are deposited on the hearth, resulting in unstable operation.

本発明はかかる事情に鑑みてなされたもので、炉床部に
難溶性物質を堆積させることなくボロンの収率を高め、
製品単位重量当たりの電力消費量を低減させるフェロボ
ロンの製造方法を提供しようとするものである。
The present invention was made in view of the above circumstances, and aims to increase the yield of boron without depositing refractory substances on the hearth.
The present invention aims to provide a method for producing ferroboron that reduces power consumption per unit weight of the product.

[問題点を解決するための手段] 本発明によるフェロボロンの製造方法は、電気炉法によ
るフェロボロンの製造方法において、出湯口の下に深さ
100mm乃至500mmの湯溜層を設けた 直流式ジロー炉を用い、酸化硼素、硼酸等の硼素源を還
元する炭材の配合量を、前記硼素源を還元するための理
論必要量の91%乃至100%とすることを特徴とする
[Means for Solving the Problems] The method for producing ferroboron according to the present invention is a method for producing ferroboron using an electric furnace method, in which a direct current type Giraud furnace is provided with a reservoir layer having a depth of 100 mm to 500 mm below the tap. The present invention is characterized in that the blending amount of a carbon material for reducing a boron source such as boron oxide or boric acid is 91% to 100% of the theoretically necessary amount for reducing the boron source.

[作用] フェロボロンのように高融点物置を溶融還元する電気炉
として直流ジロー式電気炉を選択した理由について述べ
る。炭系質還元材を用いた酸化硼素の還元反応として次
の■乃至■の反応式が知られている。
[Operation] The reason why a DC Ziraud type electric furnace was selected as an electric furnace for melting and reducing high melting point materials such as ferroboron will be described. The following reaction formulas (1) to (3) are known as reduction reactions of boron oxide using a carbonaceous reducing material.

2/3B203+7/3C=1/3B4C+2COΔF
=173900−83.61T・・・■2/3B20s
+2C=4/3B+2CO。
2/3B203+7/3C=1/3B4C+2COΔF
=173900-83.61T...■2/3B20s
+2C=4/3B+2CO.

ΔF=179407−85.017  ・・・■2/3
B203 +284C=2/3B+2CO。
ΔF=179407-85.017...■2/3
B203 +284C=2/3B+2CO.

ΔF=196168−89.57T  ・・・■■、■
式の反応は炉内でほぼ同時に進行していると考えられる
が、熱不足の場合は0式で生成した難溶性物質のB4C
は0式の分解反応を起こさず炉内に堆積する。したがっ
て、炉内に難溶性物質を堆積させないためには電気炉は
熱集中型で、操業の容易な直流ジロー式電気炉を用いる
ことが望ましい。
ΔF=196168-89.57T...■■,■
It is thought that the reactions in the formula are proceeding almost simultaneously in the furnace, but in the case of insufficient heat, the B4C of the poorly soluble substance produced in the formula 0
is deposited in the furnace without causing the type 0 decomposition reaction. Therefore, in order to prevent the accumulation of hardly soluble substances in the furnace, it is preferable to use a direct current Giro type electric furnace, which is a heat-concentrating electric furnace and is easy to operate.

出湯口の下に設けた深さ100mm乃至500mmの湯
溜りにより難溶性物質のB4Cの浮上、排出が円滑に行
われ、その深さは操業中安定しており、ジロー炉の炉底
電極が侵食される虞はない。
A pool with a depth of 100 mm to 500 mm installed under the tap tap allows the refractory B4C to float and be discharged smoothly, and its depth remains stable during operation, preventing erosion of the bottom electrode of the Giraud furnace. There is no risk of it happening.

また、炭材の配合量は過剰になると、上記■、0式に示
される通り難溶性物質のB4Cの生成または、B4Cを
分解するB2O3の減少により84Cの炉床への堆積が
進行する。一方、これが不足すると8203の還元が不
十分で、ボロンの収率が低下する。この兼合いの中で試
験を重ねた結果、硼素源を還元する炭材の配合量を、硼
素源を還元するための理論必要量の91%乃至100%
とした。
Furthermore, if the blended amount of carbonaceous material becomes excessive, the deposition of 84C on the hearth progresses due to the formation of B4C, which is a poorly soluble substance, or a decrease in B2O3, which decomposes B4C, as shown in equation (1) and 0 above. On the other hand, if this is insufficient, the reduction of 8203 will be insufficient and the yield of boron will decrease. As a result of repeated tests with this balance in mind, the blending amount of carbon material to reduce the boron source was determined to be 91% to 100% of the theoretically required amount to reduce the boron source.
And so.

[実施例] 最初に、電気炉法によるフェロボロンの製造方法で、出
湯口の下に湯溜りを設けた直流ジロー炉を用いることが
最適であることを見出した経緯について説明する。
[Example] First, a description will be given of how it was discovered that it was optimal to use a direct current Ziraud furnace in which a molten metal pool was provided below the tap in a method for producing ferroboron using an electric furnace method.

第1表は500KVA試験電気炉で連続20ch目標の
操業結果であり、装入原料の還元材配合量は硼酸に対す
る理論必要量の95%で一定とした。また、築炉はいず
れも炉床に湯溜り部は設けなかった。
Table 1 shows the operation results of a 500 KVA test electric furnace with a target of 20 continuous channels, and the amount of reducing agent mixed in the charging raw material was kept constant at 95% of the theoretically required amount of boric acid. In addition, none of the furnaces were built with a sump on the hearth.

第1表 3相エル−炉では操業6ch目で炉床上昇による出湯不
良となり操業中断となった。この炉帯を解体し炉床上昇
を調査した結果、難溶性物質の炉床堆積は240+am
であった。このことから3相エル−炉の熱集中は上記0
式の反応進行に不十分であることが判明した。
In the 3-phase L-furnace shown in Table 1, in the 6th channel of operation, there was a failure in tapping due to the rise of the hearth, and the operation was suspended. As a result of dismantling this hearth zone and investigating the rise of the hearth, it was found that the amount of refractory substances deposited on the hearth was 240+ am.
Met. Therefore, the heat concentration in the three-phase L-furnace is 0 as above.
It was found that the reaction of Eq.

交流ジロー炉では3相エル−炉に比べて良好な結果とな
り、目標の20chを達成することが出来た。しかし、
炉体の解体結果では90mmの炉床上昇となっていた。
The AC Giraud furnace gave better results than the three-phase L-furnace, and was able to achieve the target of 20 channels. but,
The results of the dismantling of the furnace body showed that the hearth had risen by 90mm.

交流ジロー炉は3相エル−炉に比べてかなり熱集中炉で
あり、フェロボロン用電気炉として連続操業は可能であ
るが、炉床上昇に対しては満足すべきものではない。
The AC Giraud furnace is a much more heat-concentrating furnace than the three-phase L-furnace, and although continuous operation is possible as an electric furnace for ferroboron, it is not satisfactory in terms of hearth rise.

次いで交流ジロー炉と直流ジロー炉で炉床上昇の比較試
験を以下のように小型試験炉を用いて実施し、直流ジロ
ー炉が適しているこを確認した。
Next, a comparative test of hearth rise between AC and DC Ziro furnaces was conducted using a small test furnace as shown below, and it was confirmed that the DC Ziro furnace was suitable.

第2表は交流ジロー炉と直流ジロー炉の切り替え可能な
75KVA試験炉で行った10ch操業の結果で、装入
原料は上記500KVA試験電気炉の場合と同様とした
Table 2 shows the results of a 10-channel operation carried out in a 75KVA test furnace that can be switched between an AC and DC Ziro furnace, and the charged raw materials were the same as in the case of the 500KVA test electric furnace.

第  2  表 目標の10chは操業はいずれも可能であったが、交流
ジロー炉は500KVA試験電気炉と同様に炉床上昇が
認められなたが、直流ジロー炉では炉床上昇が全くなく
、逆に20mm炉床が下がっていた。
The target 10 channels in Table 2 were all operational, but in the AC Ziro furnace, no hearth rise was observed as in the 500KVA test electric furnace, but in the DC Ziro furnace, there was no hearth rise at all, and the reverse was true. The hearth was lowered by 20mm.

上述の電気炉形式比較試験において直流ジロー炉の場合
、操業中に炉底が侵食されることが明らかとなった。ジ
ロー炉では炉底が侵食されると、通常は行う必要のない
炉底電極の取り替え作業により操業が中断され、また場
合によっては大事故につながる炉底からの湯漏れの虞が
ある。この解決策として炉底電極の設置位置を湯口レベ
ルより低くして湯溜り部を設けた試験を500KVA直
流ジロー炉で実施した。この試験における装入原料は上
記0式の反応で、難溶融性物質である 84Cを分解す
ために必要なり203が不足しないように、上記■、■
式の反応を抑制する意味で硼酸に対する炭材配合量を理
論必要量の95%から91%に下げて行った。湯溜り深
さは200mmでスタートしたが、5日後の40ch目
で280mmとなり、その後5日間操業したが変化なく
横這いとなった。この深さは炉内精練温度にバランスし
たものであり、大型炉になれば熱容量が増えるので若干
深くなることは容易に推定されるが、それ以上に炉底が
侵食されることはないと考えられる。
In the electric furnace type comparison test mentioned above, it was found that in the case of a DC Giraud furnace, the bottom of the furnace eroded during operation. When the bottom of a Giraud furnace is eroded, operations are interrupted due to the need to replace the bottom electrode, which is not normally necessary, and there is a risk of hot water leaking from the bottom, which may lead to a major accident. As a solution to this problem, a test was conducted in a 500 KVA DC Ziraud furnace in which the bottom electrode was placed lower than the sprue level and a sump was provided. The raw material to be charged in this test is the reaction of formula 0 above, which is necessary to decompose 84C, which is a difficult-to-melt substance, and in order to avoid a shortage of 203,
In order to suppress the reaction of the formula, the amount of carbon material added to boric acid was reduced from 95% of the theoretically required amount to 91%. The water pool depth started at 200 mm, but after 5 days, at the 40th channel, it reached 280 mm, and after 5 days of operation, it remained unchanged. This depth is balanced with the scouring temperature inside the furnace, and it is easy to assume that it will be slightly deeper as the heat capacity increases in larger furnaces, but we do not think that the bottom of the furnace will be further eroded. It will be done.

次いで同一炉で装入原料の硼酸に対する炭材配合量を理
論必要量の95%配合した試験を20ch実施した。こ
の試験においても炉床上昇は全くなく、余分なり4Cは
出湯とともに炉外に排出され、湯溜り深さは280■で
推移した。一方、この湯溜りを設けることによって第3
表に示す通り製品品位のバラツキの減少および消費電力
の低減が認められた。
Next, in the same furnace, a 20-channel test was conducted in which the amount of carbon material mixed with the boric acid used as the charging material was 95% of the theoretically required amount. In this test as well, there was no rise in the hearth, the excess 4C was discharged out of the furnace as the hot water was tapped, and the pool depth remained at 280 cm. On the other hand, by providing this hot water pool, a third
As shown in the table, a reduction in product quality variation and power consumption was observed.

第  3  表 湯溜りの有効深さを100mm乃至500mmとするこ
とが最適であるとした理由は次の通りである。
The reason why it is optimal to set the effective depth of the third front pool to 100 mm to 500 mm is as follows.

出湯口の下に湯溜りがない場合は、炉内で還元材過剰で
B4Cが生成した場合、出湯後に炉床部にフェロボロン
溶湯が殆どない状態では前記84Cが溶解しないので炉
床堆積物になることは容易に推定されるところであり、
出湯直後の炉床にフェロボロン溶湯が残留していれば、
そのB4Cは比重差から流動性のある溶湯上にあって、
出湯時にそのフェロボロン溶湯の流れにのって炉外に排
出されることも試験操業で確認されているところである
。出湯口の下に300mmの湯溜りを設けた900kw
炉の試験操業においる出湯直後の炉床深さの測定では出
湯口の下の炉床深さは350+++aと深くなっていた
が残湯深さは250t+*であった。したがって湯溜り
の有効深さは差し引き100mm+以上必要であると判
断された。また、上限については熱バランス的に決まる
ものであるが、1ケ月間の操業結果では370mmでバ
ランスしており、さらに、フェロボロンが殆ど遊離しな
い層を130mm設けて炉底電極を保護することを考え
、上限深さを500mmとした。炭材の配合量を硼素源
を還元するための理論必要量の91%乃至100%とし
た理由は、次のようにボロン収率の検討結果によるもの
である。上記0式の反応で生成した難溶性のB4Cを0
式の反応で酸化分解するために炭材配合量を少なめに設
定すれば、ボロン収率の低下をきたし、逆にボロン収率
を高めるために必要以上の炭材を配合すれば硼酸の不足
で0式の反応を起こすことなく、B4Cをの形で炉内に
堆積するか、または出湯中に排出されても精製工程で不
純物として除去されるので結局はボロン収率が低下する
If there is no puddle under the tap, if B4C is generated due to excess reducing agent in the furnace, the 84C will not dissolve if there is almost no ferroboron molten metal in the hearth after tapping, resulting in hearth deposits. It can be easily inferred that
If molten ferroboron remains on the hearth immediately after tapping,
The B4C is on top of the fluid molten metal due to the difference in specific gravity,
It has also been confirmed in test operations that the ferroboron melt flows out of the furnace during tapping. 900kw with a 300mm hot water pool under the hot water outlet
When the depth of the hearth was measured immediately after tapping in the test operation of the furnace, the depth of the hearth below the tap was as deep as 350+++a, but the depth of the remaining metal was 250t+*. Therefore, it was determined that the effective depth of the hot water pool should be 100 mm+ or more. In addition, the upper limit is determined by heat balance, but according to the results of one month's operation, it is balanced at 370 mm, and furthermore, we are considering creating a layer of 130 mm in which almost no ferroboron is released to protect the bottom electrode. , the upper limit depth was set to 500 mm. The reason why the blending amount of the carbonaceous material was set to 91% to 100% of the theoretically necessary amount for reducing the boron source was based on the results of the study on the boron yield as follows. The poorly soluble B4C produced in the reaction of formula 0 above is
If the amount of carbonaceous material blended is set to a small value for oxidative decomposition by the reaction of the formula, the boron yield will decrease, and conversely, if more carbonaceous material is blended than necessary to increase the boron yield, there will be a shortage of boric acid. B4C is deposited in the furnace in the form of B4C without causing the Equation 0 reaction, or even if it is discharged during tapping, it is removed as an impurity in the purification process, resulting in a lower boron yield.

従って難溶性物質であるB4Cを炉内に堆積させること
なく、高いボロン収率を得る適正な炭材量がおのずと存
在する0本発明者らは上記の考え方に立って種々の実験
を行った結果、この炭材量は原料中の酸素の総和を還元
するために必要な理論炭材量に対する実際の配合炭材量
の比(以下、これをFC当量率という)が91%乃至1
00%の範囲にあることが望ましいことを知見した。第
1図はボロン収率とFC当量率との関係を表すグラフ図
で、硼酸源として0.5mm以下の無水硼酸、炭材とし
て微粉炭または木炭を使用した結果である。
Therefore, there is naturally an appropriate amount of carbon material to obtain a high boron yield without depositing B4C, which is a poorly soluble substance, in the furnace.The inventors have conducted various experiments based on the above idea. , this amount of carbon material is such that the ratio of the actual amount of blended carbon material to the theoretical amount of carbon material required to reduce the total amount of oxygen in the raw material (hereinafter referred to as FC equivalent ratio) is 91% to 1.
It has been found that it is desirable to be in the range of 00%. FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between boron yield and FC equivalent rate, and shows the results when boric anhydride of 0.5 mm or less was used as the boric acid source and pulverized coal or charcoal was used as the carbon material.

即ち、本発明者らが推定した通り、ボロン収率はFC当
量率に対して極大値があり、FC当量率が88%以上か
ら顕著にボロン収率が高くなり、100%以上になると
大幅に低下する傾向を示しているが、安定した高ボロン
収率を得るためのFC当量率は91%乃至100%であ
る。一方、ボロン収率の向上は製品単位重量当たりの消
費電力の低減効果をもたらす。第2図は上記第1図の結
果を得た実験による製品単位重量当たりの消費電力とF
C当量率との関係で、FC当量率91%乃至100%で
低い消費電力になっている。
That is, as estimated by the present inventors, the boron yield has a maximum value with respect to the FC equivalent ratio, and the boron yield increases significantly when the FC equivalent ratio is 88% or higher, and increases significantly when the FC equivalent ratio exceeds 100%. Although it shows a decreasing tendency, the FC equivalent rate for obtaining a stable high boron yield is 91% to 100%. On the other hand, improved boron yield has the effect of reducing power consumption per unit weight of the product. Figure 2 shows the power consumption and F per unit weight of the product from the experiment that yielded the results shown in Figure 1 above.
In relation to the C equivalent rate, the power consumption is low at an FC equivalent rate of 91% to 100%.

次に、本発明の実施例にもとすく具体的な数値を挙げる
。 900kw直流ジロー炉で30日間の連続操業を行
った結果で、第4表に示す通りである。なお、このとき
湯溜り深さは操業7日で370mmとなり、以降横這い
となった。
Next, specific numerical values will be listed as examples of the present invention. Table 4 shows the results of 30 days of continuous operation in a 900kw DC Giro furnace. At this time, the depth of the hot water pool reached 370 mm after 7 days of operation, and remained the same thereafter.

第4表 [発明の効果コ 本発明のフェロボロンの製造方法によれば、出湯口の下
に湯溜りを設けた直流式ジロー炉を用い、硼素源の還元
材を理論必要量以下とするので、炉床部に難溶性物質を
堆積させることなくボロンの収率を高め、製品単位重量
当たりの電力消費量を低減させることが出来る。
Table 4 [Effects of the Invention] According to the method for producing ferroboron of the present invention, a direct current type Giraud furnace with a pool provided under the tap is used, and the reducing agent of the boron source is reduced to less than the theoretically required amount. It is possible to increase the yield of boron without depositing refractory substances on the hearth, and to reduce power consumption per unit weight of the product.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図はFC当量率に対するボロン収率を表すグラフ図
、第2図はFC当量率に対する製品単位重量当たりの電
力消費量を表すグラフ図である。
FIG. 1 is a graph showing boron yield versus FC equivalent rate, and FIG. 2 is a graph showing power consumption per unit weight of product versus FC equivalent rate.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims]  電気炉法によるフェロボロンの製造方法において、出
湯口の下に深さ100mm乃至500mmの湯溜層を設
けた直流式ジロー炉を用い、酸化硼素、硼酸等の硼素源
を還元する炭材の配合量を、前記硼素源を還元するため
の理論必要量の91%乃至100%とすることを特徴と
するフェロボロンの製造方法。
In the electric furnace method for producing ferroboron, a direct current type Giraud furnace with a 100 mm to 500 mm deep molten metal layer under the tap is used, and the amount of carbon material used to reduce boron sources such as boron oxide and boric acid is determined. 91% to 100% of the theoretically required amount for reducing the boron source.
JP33686087A 1987-12-29 1987-12-29 Manufacture of ferroboron Pending JPH01177334A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP33686087A JPH01177334A (en) 1987-12-29 1987-12-29 Manufacture of ferroboron

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP33686087A JPH01177334A (en) 1987-12-29 1987-12-29 Manufacture of ferroboron

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01177334A true JPH01177334A (en) 1989-07-13

Family

ID=18303325

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP33686087A Pending JPH01177334A (en) 1987-12-29 1987-12-29 Manufacture of ferroboron

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH01177334A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007026192A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-08 Genel Metalurji Ve Bor Uç Ürünleri Üretim Iç Ve Dis Ticaret Anonim Sirketi Production of ferroboron in direct current electrical arc furnace

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5137613A (en) * 1974-08-01 1976-03-30 Wurlitzer Co
JPS5217492A (en) * 1975-07-30 1977-02-09 Squibb & Sons Inc Production of 33heterothioo7 thioureidocephalosporins
JPS602649A (en) * 1983-06-20 1985-01-08 Nippon Denko Kk Production of ferroboron by electric furnace method
JPS6151020A (en) * 1984-05-29 1986-03-13 ダブリユ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ インコ−ポレイテイド polyurethane prepolymer
JPS6151021A (en) * 1984-08-16 1986-03-13 Takeda Chem Ind Ltd Open-cellular rigid urethane foam

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5137613A (en) * 1974-08-01 1976-03-30 Wurlitzer Co
JPS5217492A (en) * 1975-07-30 1977-02-09 Squibb & Sons Inc Production of 33heterothioo7 thioureidocephalosporins
JPS602649A (en) * 1983-06-20 1985-01-08 Nippon Denko Kk Production of ferroboron by electric furnace method
JPS6151020A (en) * 1984-05-29 1986-03-13 ダブリユ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ インコ−ポレイテイド polyurethane prepolymer
JPS6151021A (en) * 1984-08-16 1986-03-13 Takeda Chem Ind Ltd Open-cellular rigid urethane foam

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007026192A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-08 Genel Metalurji Ve Bor Uç Ürünleri Üretim Iç Ve Dis Ticaret Anonim Sirketi Production of ferroboron in direct current electrical arc furnace

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP4092152B1 (en) Steel for wind power gear with improved purity and reliability, and smelting method therefor
EP3705586A1 (en) Electric furnace and method for melting and reducing iron oxide-containing iron raw material
JPH0873209A (en) Silicon purification method
GB1586762A (en) Metal refining method and apparatus
CN106929631B (en) The dross method that high-titanium blast furnace slag carbonization is smelted
US4214897A (en) Process for the extraction of non-ferrous metals from slags and other metallurgical by-products
CN109777918A (en) A kind of external refining production method refining high-carbon-chromium bearing steel inclusion particle
EP0655508B1 (en) Process for using foamed slag in stainless steel production in the electric arc furnace
US3843352A (en) Method for melting sponge metal using gas plasma in a cooled metal crucible
CN1186464C (en) Production method of small square billet continuous casting bearing steel
CN113652564B (en) Method for smelting high-temperature alloy by using return material
JPH01177334A (en) Manufacture of ferroboron
CN102951645A (en) Method for removing boron and phosphorus impurity in industrial silicon by slagging refining
CN110724788B (en) Preparation and use method of carbon-containing steel block deoxidizer for vacuum furnace steelmaking
CN108359910A (en) A kind of low carbon low silicon aluminium killed steel composite purifying agent alloy production method
US4490169A (en) Method for reducing ore
CN110482556B (en) A kind of slag-forming agent for removing boron in low-temperature refining of silicon material and using method thereof
CN114703374A (en) Medium-fluorine high-efficiency desulfurization slag system for electroslag remelting C-HRA-3 alloy and using method
CN85103967A (en) Rare earth concentrate pellet (or piece) ore heat furnace preparation rare-earth extract slag and contain the niobium ferrophosphorus
RU2815374C1 (en) Composite alloy and method of its manufacture
CN205954085U (en) Equipment of metallic lead recovery of hot aluminium ash and slag preparation steelmaking auxiliary material
RU2102516C1 (en) Method of preparing ferrotitanium
RU2549820C1 (en) Method for aluminothermic obtainment of ferroalloys
CN119194088A (en) A slag system for ingot extraction electroslag remelting nitrogen-controlled austenitic stainless steel, preparation method and use method
JPH0657866B2 (en) High-purity phosphorus iron purification method