JPH02150737A - Bridge model for wind tunnel test - Google Patents
Bridge model for wind tunnel testInfo
- Publication number
- JPH02150737A JPH02150737A JP30471788A JP30471788A JPH02150737A JP H02150737 A JPH02150737 A JP H02150737A JP 30471788 A JP30471788 A JP 30471788A JP 30471788 A JP30471788 A JP 30471788A JP H02150737 A JPH02150737 A JP H02150737A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- bridge
- arrow
- wind tunnel
- direction shown
- model
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 15
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001447 compensatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Aerodynamic Tests, Hydrodynamic Tests, Wind Tunnels, And Water Tanks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
〔産業上の利用分野〕
本発明は、吊橋の架橋におけるブロック仮設状態の耐風
性能の検証等に使用する風洞試験用橋梁模型に関する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a bridge model for wind tunnel testing used for verifying the wind resistance performance of blocks in a temporary structure in suspension bridge construction.
橋梁の耐風性能を調べる風洞試験などに於いてその橋梁
模型に要求される条件としては、風の流れが相似になる
模型の形状および振動の形態か相似になる剛性と重量或
いは補償性モーメントかある。第5図は、一般の風洞試
験に供される橋梁模型の部分的な斜視図であり、ケーブ
ル01にハンガーローブo2を介して吊り下げられた橋
桁模型としての外形材o3で風の流れが相似になる模型
の形状の溝底をしている。そして外形材03は、同図の
左端部分解図に示すように上部構造03bと下部構造0
3aに分けて製作され、その中央部に模型橋桁の曲げや
捩れ剛性を相似させるための剛性棒o5を通し、またこ
の剛性棒05が貫通するケーブル碇着金具04が模型橋
桁の重量を相似してハンガーロープ02から吊り下げら
れている。In wind tunnel tests to examine the wind resistance performance of bridges, the conditions required for the bridge model are the shape of the model so that the wind flow is similar, the form of vibration, and the stiffness and weight or compensatory moment that are similar. . Fig. 5 is a partial perspective view of a bridge model used for general wind tunnel testing, and the wind flow is similar in the external shape member o3 as a bridge girder model suspended from cable 01 via hanger lobe o2. The bottom of the groove is shaped like a model. The outer material 03 is composed of an upper structure 03b and a lower structure 0, as shown in the exploded view of the left end of the figure.
A rigid rod o5 is passed through the center of the bridge to simulate the bending and torsional rigidity of the model bridge girder, and a cable anchoring fitting 04 through which this rigid rod 05 passes is designed to simulate the weight of the model bridge girder. It is suspended from the hanger rope 02.
通常の橋梁模型は製作上から橋桁となる外形材03は上
述のように長平方向に分割して作られるが、橋桁の剛性
を受持つ剛性棒o5は轟然のことながら一本の長尺物を
通して作られている。In a normal bridge model, the external member 03 that becomes the bridge girder is divided into longitudinal sections as described above, but the rigid rod O5, which is responsible for the rigidity of the bridge girder, is made by passing it through a single long object. It is made.
従来の風洞試験は、完成した橋梁の耐風性能を調べるの
を目的としてその構成を検討した上述の橋梁模型を使用
してきたが、建設中の橋梁の耐風性能を調べるとなると
橋梁の形状や剛性などが上述の橋梁模型のものと全く異
ったものとなるはずである。Conventional wind tunnel tests have used the above-mentioned bridge model whose configuration was studied for the purpose of investigating the wind resistance performance of a completed bridge, but when investigating the wind resistance performance of a bridge under construction, it is necessary to examine the shape and rigidity of the bridge. should be completely different from the bridge model described above.
第3図は、ブロック工法により吊橋を架設する事例を示
すものである。通常のブロック工法による吊橋の建設は
まず主塔40を建て、次にメーンケーブル10を懸け、
つづいて/%ンガーロープ20を下げて主塔40の側か
らブロック建造した橋桁ブロック30を順次つないでゆ
く。この場合、ハンガーロープ20に吊り下げた橋桁ブ
ロック30 bの端面をすでに固定されている橋桁ブロ
ック30 aの端面を突き合わせて溶接し、最後に中央
部の橋桁ブロックの両端面を隣接する橋桁ブロックに溶
接して完成する。この工法は実績も多く確実な工法との
評価も高いが、橋桁ブロック30を順次溶接する関係上
橋桁ブロックを全部並べおわるのに長期間を要し、この
期間、ブロック運搬船やクレーン船など作業船が橋の下
を頻繁に航行し占拠することになり、船舶の往来が繁し
い海峡等に架設する場合の工法としては不具合であり、
見直しが要求されており、その代替工法として別の仮設
工法が検討されている。Figure 3 shows an example of constructing a suspension bridge using the block construction method. To construct a suspension bridge using the normal block construction method, first build the main tower 40, then hang the main cable 10,
Next, the bridge girder blocks 30 constructed from the main tower 40 are successively connected by lowering the rope 20. In this case, the end faces of the bridge girder block 30b suspended from the hanger rope 20 are butted against the end faces of the already fixed bridge girder block 30a and welded, and finally both end faces of the bridge girder block in the center are welded to the adjacent bridge girder blocks. Complete by welding. This construction method has a good track record and is highly regarded as a reliable construction method, but because the bridge girder blocks 30 are welded one after another, it takes a long time to arrange all the bridge girder blocks, and during this period, work vessels such as block carriers and crane ships This is a defective construction method when constructing a bridge in a strait or other area where there is heavy ship traffic.
A review has been requested, and other temporary construction methods are being considered as an alternative construction method.
第4図はプロツク工法の一変形である仮どめ工法に使用
する橋梁ブロックの一事例を示すものである。Figure 4 shows an example of a bridge block used in the temporary fixing method, which is a variation of the block construction method.
すなわち、従来工法のネックは橋桁ブロック30を順次
溶接することにあり、このために海峡等を占拠する時間
が長くなったが、第4図に示す様に隣接する橋梁ブロッ
ク30a、30bを仮どめした全ブロックをハンガーロ
ープ20に吊り下げてから溶接するように工程を変えれ
ば槁下即ち船舶等の往来する海峡を占拠する時間は大幅
に短縮できる筈である。In other words, the bottleneck of the conventional construction method is that the bridge girder blocks 30 are welded one after another, which increases the time required to occupy the straits, etc. However, as shown in Fig. 4, adjacent bridge blocks 30a and 30b are temporarily welded. If the process is changed so that all the blocks are hung on the hanger rope 20 and then welded, the time required to occupy the strait where ships and the like come and go can be greatly reduced.
各橋桁ブロック30の仮どめは、隣接する橋桁ブロック
30 aと30 bの端面上部の複数個所を仮設フラン
ジ50aと50 bをボルト51で連結し、橋梁ブロッ
クの下部をオーバルな連結穴52 aと52 bとの間
をフック又はUボルト53などによってルーズに締結し
ておく。これはあ(まで仮どめであり、本溶接前には調
整をするし、その調整前には各橋梁ブロックの継ぎ目に
は1曲げIを許容しておくこと必要がある。しかしこの
仮どめの工法においても橋梁ブロックの間の溶接には長
期間を要し仮どめ状態にある吊橋の耐風性能を調査して
おく必要がある。そのための風洞試験用模型の構成や剛
性をどうするかが必要であるにもかかわらずこの様な風
洞試験用橋梁模型は現在まで考えられていない。Each bridge girder block 30 is temporarily fastened by connecting the temporary flanges 50a and 50b at multiple locations on the upper end faces of adjacent bridge girder blocks 30a and 30b with bolts 51, and then connecting the lower part of the bridge block with an oval connecting hole 52a. and 52b are loosely fastened with hooks or U-bolts 53. This is a temporary fix until A (A), and it will be adjusted before the actual welding, and before that adjustment, it is necessary to allow one bend I at the joint of each bridge block.However, this temporary fix Even in this construction method, it takes a long time to weld between bridge blocks, and it is necessary to investigate the wind resistance performance of a temporarily fixed suspension bridge.For this purpose, it is important to consider the structure and rigidity of the model for wind tunnel tests. Although necessary, such a bridge model for wind tunnel testing has not been considered to date.
すなわち、風洞試験用橋梁模型は第5図に示したように
ブロック方式の外形材03の橋桁としての剛性を剛性棒
05に受持たせているのであるから、前記仮どめ工法の
橋桁の剛性を模擬するにはブロック毎の短尺の剛性棒を
蝶番式ヒンジで接続することが考えられる。しかし多数
のとンジの摩擦係数を等しくすることは至難であり、又
、ブロックの継目に摩擦損失があることは風による振動
特性を調べる際に減衰作用をする不都合があり不具合で
ある。In other words, in the bridge model for wind tunnel testing, as shown in Fig. 5, the rigidity of the block-type external member 03 as a bridge girder is taken care of by the rigid rods 05, so the rigidity of the bridge girder using the temporary fixing method is To simulate this, it is possible to connect short rigid rods for each block with hinges. However, it is extremely difficult to equalize the friction coefficients of a large number of hinges, and the presence of friction loss at the joints of the blocks is a problem because it has a damping effect when examining the vibration characteristics due to wind.
本発明は、上述の仮どめ工法を実施するため、ハンガー
ロープを介してメーンケーブルから吊り下げられた各橋
桁ブロック相互を仮どめして架設する工法の過程におけ
る耐風性能を調べるための各ブロック毎の短尺の剛性棒
を互にX形はねて連結した風洞試験用橋梁模型を提供す
ることを目的とする。In order to carry out the above-mentioned temporary fixing method, the present invention aims to investigate the wind resistance performance of each block in the process of constructing the bridge girder blocks by temporarily fixing each other, which are suspended from the main cable via hanger ropes. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a bridge model for wind tunnel tests in which short rigid rods are connected to each other in an X shape.
このため、本発明の風洞試験用橋梁模型は、橋梁の耐風
安定性を検証するため風洞試験に供する橋梁模型におい
て、模擬する橋梁の橋桁ブロック毎に分割した剛性棒を
それぞれX形ばね材で連結したことを特徴としている。For this reason, in the bridge model for wind tunnel testing of the present invention, in the bridge model used for wind tunnel testing to verify the wind resistance stability of the bridge, rigid rods divided into each bridge girder block of the bridge to be simulated are connected using X-shaped spring members. It is characterized by what it did.
(作 用〕
X形ばねは曲げ剛性に対して引張りや捩り剛性が太き(
、綿密な計算によって第4図に示した仮どめ工法に用い
る橋梁ブロックの実槁仮どめ状態を模擬することかでき
、前記仮どめ工法における工事過程の耐風性能を風洞試
験で確認することかできる。(Function) X-shaped springs have greater tensile and torsional rigidity than bending rigidity (
Through careful calculations, it is possible to simulate the actual temporary fixing condition of the bridge blocks used in the temporary fixing method shown in Figure 4, and the wind resistance performance of the construction process in the temporary fixing method can be confirmed by wind tunnel tests. I can do it.
〔実施例〕
第1図は本発明になる風洞試験用橋梁模型の剛性棒接続
金具の一実施例の断面図であり、第2図はその平面図で
ある。[Example] FIG. 1 is a sectional view of an example of a rigid rod connection fitting for a bridge model for wind tunnel testing according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof.
各模型ブロック毎に切られた剛性棒5の両端縁に上下面
を橋軸に対して45°に加工された取付面を有する取付
金具7を固定し、接続される1対の取付金具7aと7b
との間に板ばね材6aと6bをX形に取付ける。ここで
板ばね6aは第1図において左下りの2枚の板ばねであ
り、6bは右下りの広幅(5aの幅の2倍に等しい)の
板ばねであり、それぞれ押え板9にビス8で取付金具に
固定している。A mounting bracket 7 having a mounting surface whose upper and lower surfaces are machined at 45 degrees with respect to the bridge axis is fixed to both ends of a rigid rod 5 cut for each model block, and a pair of mounting brackets 7a to be connected. 7b
The leaf spring materials 6a and 6b are installed in an X shape between the two. Here, the leaf springs 6a are two leaf springs facing downward to the left in FIG. 1, and 6b is a wide leaf spring (equal to twice the width of 5a) facing downward to the right. It is fixed to the mounting bracket.
このように板ばねをX形に取付けると、第1図の矢示A
方向の変形、即ち仮どめした部分の曲げは容易に模擬す
ることができ、また仮どめ部の伸び即ち矢示B方向の変
形は抑制することができる。また第2図の矢示C方向の
横振れと矢”示り方向の捩れ剛性は大きく、第4図に示
したような実橋の仮どめ方式が決定すればそれに応じた
X形ばねの設計で相似化できる。When the leaf spring is installed in an X shape like this, the arrow A in Figure 1
Deformation in the direction, ie, bending of the temporarily fastened portion, can be easily simulated, and elongation of the temporarily fastened portion, ie, deformation in the direction of arrow B, can be suppressed. In addition, the lateral vibration in the direction of arrow C in Figure 2 and the torsional stiffness in the direction of arrow '' are large, so if the temporary fixing method for a real bridge as shown in Figure 4 is decided, then the X-shaped springs will be adjusted accordingly. Can be made similar in design.
上述の本発明の風洞試験用橋梁模型によれば橋梁模型の
剛性棒の接続にX形ばねを用いることによって仮どめ工
法の工事過程における耐風性能を調べるためαfi←笹
冊橋梁1を相似することができ、船舶の往来が繁しい海
峡に架設する場合の仮どめ工法の成否を風洞試験で事前
に確認することができるようになる。According to the above-mentioned bridge model for wind tunnel testing of the present invention, by using X-shaped springs to connect the rigid rods of the bridge model, αfi←Sasaboku Bridge 1 is made similar to αfi←to examine the wind resistance performance during the construction process of the temporary fixing method. This makes it possible to use wind tunnel tests to confirm the success or failure of the temporary fixing method when constructing a structure in a strait where there is heavy ship traffic.
第1図は、本発明の第1実施例に係る剛性棒接続金具の
断面図、第2図はその平面図である。
第3図は吊橋工法の概念図、第4図は仮どめ工法におけ
る橋桁ブロックの接続状態を示す図、第5図は従来の風
洞試験用吊橋模型の部分的斜視図である。
5・・・剛性棒、6・・・板ばね、7・・・取付金具、
8・・・ビス、9・・・押え板。FIG. 1 is a sectional view of a rigid rod connection fitting according to a first embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof. Fig. 3 is a conceptual diagram of the suspension bridge construction method, Fig. 4 is a diagram showing the connection state of bridge girder blocks in the temporary fixing method, and Fig. 5 is a partial perspective view of a conventional suspension bridge model for wind tunnel testing. 5... Rigid rod, 6... Leaf spring, 7... Mounting bracket,
8...screw, 9...pressing plate.
Claims (1)
模型において、模擬する橋梁の橋桁ブロック毎に分割し
た剛性棒をそれぞれX形ばね材で連結したことを特徴と
する風洞試験用橋梁模型。A bridge model for wind tunnel testing, which is used for wind tunnel testing to verify the wind resistance stability of a bridge, and is characterized in that rigid bars divided into each bridge girder block of the bridge to be simulated are connected by X-shaped spring members.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63304717A JP2540621B2 (en) | 1988-12-01 | 1988-12-01 | Bridge model for wind tunnel test |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63304717A JP2540621B2 (en) | 1988-12-01 | 1988-12-01 | Bridge model for wind tunnel test |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH02150737A true JPH02150737A (en) | 1990-06-11 |
| JP2540621B2 JP2540621B2 (en) | 1996-10-09 |
Family
ID=17936365
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63304717A Expired - Fee Related JP2540621B2 (en) | 1988-12-01 | 1988-12-01 | Bridge model for wind tunnel test |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2540621B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104535288A (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2015-04-22 | 西南交通大学 | Wind tunnel experiment device for testing bridge aerodynamic parameters under skew wind action |
| CN109540460A (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2019-03-29 | 西南交通大学 | A kind of double box beam whole bridge emulation girder core beam constructional forms of large span |
| CN110487504A (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2019-11-22 | 浙江大学 | Wind tunnel test device for wind load of covered bridge considering the distance between bridge deck and water surface |
| CN117516858A (en) * | 2023-11-01 | 2024-02-06 | 同济大学 | Wind tunnel test device during the girder erection stage of suspension bridge construction |
-
1988
- 1988-12-01 JP JP63304717A patent/JP2540621B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104535288A (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2015-04-22 | 西南交通大学 | Wind tunnel experiment device for testing bridge aerodynamic parameters under skew wind action |
| CN109540460A (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2019-03-29 | 西南交通大学 | A kind of double box beam whole bridge emulation girder core beam constructional forms of large span |
| CN109540460B (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2023-09-29 | 西南交通大学 | A kind of long-span double box girder full bridge aeroelastic model main girder core beam construction form |
| CN110487504A (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2019-11-22 | 浙江大学 | Wind tunnel test device for wind load of covered bridge considering the distance between bridge deck and water surface |
| CN110487504B (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2020-06-23 | 浙江大学 | Wind tunnel test device for covered bridge wind load considering the distance between bridge deck and water surface |
| CN117516858A (en) * | 2023-11-01 | 2024-02-06 | 同济大学 | Wind tunnel test device during the girder erection stage of suspension bridge construction |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2540621B2 (en) | 1996-10-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Xu et al. | Vibration studies of Tsing Ma suspension bridge | |
| JP5175343B2 (en) | Building frame harrow / spider full moment column / beam connection | |
| Williams et al. | Seismic response of long curved bridge structures: experimental model studies | |
| US6226935B1 (en) | Seismic isolator | |
| CN109797664B (en) | Large-span assembly type bridge modularized truss and assembling and folding method | |
| CN102913742A (en) | Structure construction and construction method of steel truss bow-tie type integrated node | |
| JPH02150737A (en) | Bridge model for wind tunnel test | |
| Tumbeva et al. | Investigating the redundancy of steel truss bridges composed of modular joints | |
| Tedesco et al. | Finite element method analysis of bridge girder-diaphragm interaction | |
| Tanaka et al. | Aerodynamic stability of non-symmetrically erected suspension bridge girders | |
| CN110984375A (en) | Self-resetting steel frame beam column joint structure and manufacturing method | |
| Kennedy et al. | Prestressed continuous composite bridges under dynamic load | |
| Frater | Performance of welded rectangular hollow structural section trusses. | |
| Sakimoto et al. | Experimental study on the ultimate strength of steel arches | |
| Rönnquist et al. | Dynamic properties from full scale recordings and FE-modelling of a slender footbridge with flexible connections | |
| Caicedo et al. | Comparison of modeling techniques for dynamic analysis of a cable-stayed bridge | |
| JPH11131426A (en) | Falling bridge prevention device | |
| Parivallal et al. | Instrumentation and Response Measurement of a Double-Lane Bailey Bridge During Load Test. | |
| Mahamid et al. | Investigating Different Horizontal Bracing Schemes on the Deflection and Behavior of Latticed Steel Transmission Line Towers | |
| JPS6227867Y2 (en) | ||
| Rastandi et al. | Forced vibration test of pedestrian steel bridge using eccentric mass shaker | |
| JPH11264114A (en) | Method for improving torsional damping of suspension bridge and suspension bridge | |
| Beavers | Fundamental Natural Frequency of Steel Joist Supported Floors | |
| HAYASHI et al. | Torsional oscillation analysis of suspension bridges by a displacement method | |
| Hansen et al. | Dynamic response of suspension bridge decks during construction |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |