JPH02228543A - Reference sample for verifying test and manufacture thereof - Google Patents
Reference sample for verifying test and manufacture thereofInfo
- Publication number
- JPH02228543A JPH02228543A JP1046566A JP4656689A JPH02228543A JP H02228543 A JPH02228543 A JP H02228543A JP 1046566 A JP1046566 A JP 1046566A JP 4656689 A JP4656689 A JP 4656689A JP H02228543 A JPH02228543 A JP H02228543A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- defect
- size
- foreign matter
- guarantee
- integrated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 8
- 239000013074 reference sample Substances 0.000 title claims description 8
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000009659 non-destructive testing Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 17
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 4
- 244000144730 Amygdalus persica Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000006040 Prunus persica var persica Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229910052581 Si3N4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Zr]=O MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon carbide Chemical compound [Si+]#[C-] HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon nitride Chemical compound N12[Si]34N5[Si]62N3[Si]51N64 HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
(産業上の利用分野)
本発明は、セラミック製品の非破壊検査や保証試験の基
準として使用するのに好適な保証試験用基準サンプルお
よびその製造方法に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a standard sample for guarantee testing suitable for use as a standard for non-destructive testing and guarantee testing of ceramic products, and a method for manufacturing the same.
(従来の技術)
セラミックスは脆性材料でありその内部に数10μ−以
上の気孔、異物、クラック等の欠陥が存在すると欠陥か
ら破壊し易い。そのため、セラミックスの製品に対して
欠陥検出のため非破壊検査や保証試験を実施してセラミ
ック製品の品質保証をする必要がある。(Prior Art) Ceramics are brittle materials, and if defects such as pores of several tens of microns or more, foreign matter, cracks, etc. are present inside the ceramics, they are likely to break due to the defects. Therefore, it is necessary to guarantee the quality of ceramic products by conducting non-destructive inspections and guarantee tests to detect defects.
セラミック体の非破壊検査方法としては、X線探傷法や
超音波探傷法が、保証試験としては、熱衝撃試験が良く
知られている。X線や超音波等による非破壊検査におい
ては、あらかじめその装置が検出できる欠陥の大きさを
知り、さらに最適な探傷条件を設定する必要がある。そ
のため、従来は欠陥の基準サンプルとしてセラミック体
にドリルやレーザーで各種のサイズの孔をあけたものを
用いていた。また、熱衝撃試験においても試験温度を設
定するのに、セラミック体にドリルやレーザーで各種サ
イズの孔をあけて欠陥の大きさと熱衝撃温度の関係を調
べていた。X-ray flaw detection and ultrasonic flaw detection are well known as nondestructive testing methods for ceramic bodies, and thermal shock testing is well known as a guarantee test. In non-destructive testing using X-rays, ultrasonic waves, etc., it is necessary to know in advance the size of defects that can be detected by the equipment and to set optimal flaw detection conditions. For this reason, conventionally, ceramic bodies with holes of various sizes drilled with a drill or laser have been used as reference samples for defects. In addition, to set the test temperature for thermal shock tests, holes of various sizes were drilled into the ceramic body using a drill or laser, and the relationship between defect size and thermal shock temperature was investigated.
(発明が解決しようとする課題)
しかしながら、上述したドリルやレーザービームなどで
孔明は加工した欠陥の大きさは、せいぜい200μmφ
程度までしか小さくする事ができず、かつ開口欠陥であ
るため、実際のセラミック製品に内在する空孔とは全く
形状や大きさが異なり、正確な検査や試験ができていな
かった。(Problem to be solved by the invention) However, the size of the defect processed by the above-mentioned drill or laser beam is at most 200 μmφ.
Since the pores can only be reduced to a certain extent and are open defects, their shape and size are completely different from the pores inherent in actual ceramic products, making accurate inspection and testing impossible.
例えば、超音波探傷法において検出した200μmφの
ドリル孔の欠陥エコー高さは、セラミック体に内在する
約200μ…φの空孔のエコー高より非常に大きく、実
際の欠陥の大きさを知る事ができないなどの問題点があ
った。For example, the defect echo height of a 200 μmφ drill hole detected by ultrasonic flaw detection is much larger than the echo height of a 200 μmφ hole inherent in a ceramic body, making it difficult to know the actual size of the defect. There were some problems, such as not being able to do it.
そのため、上述したセラミック製品の非破壊検査および
保証試験においては、各種試験の実施のために欠陥の大
きさや位置が明確な基準となる保証試験用基準サンプル
が必要であった。すなわち、非破壊検査においては基準
サンプルにより装置を較正する必要が、また保証試験に
おいては製品としての強度等を推測するための基準とし
て基準サンプルを使用する必要があった。Therefore, in the above-mentioned non-destructive inspection and warranty test of ceramic products, a standard sample for warranty test is required that has a clear reference for the size and position of defects in order to conduct various tests. That is, in nondestructive testing, it was necessary to calibrate the device using a reference sample, and in warranty testing, it was necessary to use the reference sample as a standard for estimating the strength of the product.
しかしながら、セラミック材料特有の欠陥である気孔、
異物、クランク等を模擬した基準サンプルは従来存在せ
ず、またその製造法も確立されていなかった。However, pores, which are defects specific to ceramic materials,
Conventionally, there has been no standard sample that simulates foreign objects, cranks, etc., nor has a method for producing such a standard sample been established.
本発明の目的は上述した課題を解消して、セラミック製
品の非破壊検査や保証試験において好適に使用できる保
証試験用基準サンプルおよびその製造方法を提供しよう
とするものである。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems and to provide a standard sample for a guarantee test that can be suitably used in non-destructive inspections and guarantee tests of ceramic products, and a method for manufacturing the same.
(課題を解決するための手段)
本発明の保証試験用基準サンプルは、セラミック体の非
破壊検査等の基準として使用するための基準サンプルで
あって、欠陥を模擬してその大きさおよび位置を制御し
た空孔または異物を内部に有することを特徴とするもの
である。(Means for Solving the Problems) The standard sample for guarantee testing of the present invention is a standard sample for use as a standard for non-destructive testing of ceramic bodies, and is used to simulate defects and determine their size and position. It is characterized by having controlled pores or foreign matter inside.
また、本発明の保証試験用基準サンプルの製造方法は、
有機物を焼成することにより空孔を得るか、酸化物を配
置して異物を得ることにより上記保証用基準サンプルを
製造することを特徴とするものである。In addition, the method for manufacturing the reference sample for the guarantee test of the present invention is as follows:
This method is characterized in that the above-mentioned standard sample for guarantee is manufactured by obtaining pores by firing an organic substance or by arranging an oxide to obtain foreign substances.
(作 用)
上述した構成において、その大きさおよび位置を制御し
た空孔または異物を本発明の保証試験用基準サンプルは
有しているため、大きさや位置を変化させた複数の基準
サンプルを準備してこれらの基準サンプルを使用して非
破壊検査装置の較正やセラミック製品の保証試験を好適
に実施することができる。(Function) In the above-mentioned configuration, since the reference sample for the guarantee test of the present invention has holes or foreign matter whose size and position are controlled, a plurality of reference samples with different sizes and positions are prepared. Using these reference samples, calibration of non-destructive testing equipment and guarantee testing of ceramic products can be suitably carried out.
コレラノ空孔または異物をテストピース内ノ所定位置に
形成するには、空孔形成のためには成形圧に耐えて仮焼
時には焼失する桃の種、クルジの殻等を所定粒度に粉砕
した有機物を、また異物形成のためには所定の粒度に粉
砕したZrO,、FezO4*Crz03等の酸化物を
それぞれ使用すると好適である。In order to form pores or foreign matter at a predetermined position within the test piece, an organic material such as peach seeds or cruzi shells that can withstand molding pressure and burn out during calcination is crushed to a predetermined particle size is used to form pores. In order to form foreign matter, it is preferable to use oxides such as ZrO, FezO4*Crz03, etc. that have been ground to a predetermined particle size.
すなわち、空孔形成の有機物の選択は、桃の種、クルジ
の殻相当のヤング率を有した材料が好ましく、ポリエチ
レン、ポリスチレン等の有機材料はヤング率が低く、プ
レス圧の除荷時に導入欠陥材周囲にクラックを発生させ
所定粒度の欠陥よりも大きな欠陥生成がされ、適切な保
証試験用基準サンプルが得られない。In other words, it is preferable to select a pore-forming organic substance that has a Young's modulus equivalent to that of a peach seed or a cruzi shell.Organic materials such as polyethylene and polystyrene have a low Young's modulus and are free from defects introduced during unloading of press pressure. Cracks occur around the material and defects larger than the predetermined particle size are generated, making it impossible to obtain an appropriate reference sample for guarantee testing.
(実施例)
第1図は本発明の保証試験用基準サンプルを作製する一
例を示すフローチャートである。まず、母材となるセラ
ミックス粉末と欠陥尋人材を粉砕し粒度を篩により調製
する。このとき、セラミック体内に空孔を存在させるた
めには、焼失による空孔生成の効果を利用するため桃の
種等の有機物を欠陥尋人材として使用すると好適である
。また、セラミック体内に異物を存在させるためには、
熱膨張差による界面生成のためZrO□、 Fc40.
等の酸化物を欠陥尋人材として使用すると好適である。(Example) FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing an example of producing a standard sample for a guarantee test of the present invention. First, the ceramic powder used as the base material and the defective material are crushed and the particle size is adjusted using a sieve. At this time, in order to cause pores to exist in the ceramic body, it is preferable to use an organic substance such as peach seeds as a defect material in order to take advantage of the effect of pore generation due to burning. In addition, in order to allow foreign substances to exist within the ceramic body,
ZrO□, Fc40. due to interface formation due to thermal expansion difference.
It is preferable to use oxides such as oxides such as
また、母材となるセラミックス粉末としては、窒化珪素
、ジルコニア、アルミナ、炭化珪素等の検査対象物と同
一の原料を使用する必要がある。Further, as the ceramic powder serving as the base material, it is necessary to use the same raw material as the material to be inspected, such as silicon nitride, zirconia, alumina, and silicon carbide.
次に、セラミックス粉末と粒度を調製した欠陥尋人材と
を他の焼結助剤とともに混合した後成形する。この成形
にあたっては、欠陥の大きさおよび位置等を定める必要
があり、予じめ第1図に示すフローに従って作製し、焼
成体中の欠陥サイズを確認して求めた添加欠陥導入材と
焼成後の欠陥サイズとの関係に基きこれらの制御を実施
している。Next, the ceramic powder and the defect material whose particle size has been adjusted are mixed together with other sintering aids and then molded. In this molding, it is necessary to determine the size and position of the defects, etc., and the defect introduction material is prepared by following the flow shown in Figure 1 in advance, and the defect size in the fired body is confirmed. These controls are implemented based on the relationship with the defect size.
制御の方法としてまず欠陥をランダムに導入する場合は
、篩通しした所定の粒度の欠陥導入材とセラミ・ンクス
粉末を容量比で制御することにより所定のランダムな欠
陥密度を得ている。また、欠陥の位置を定める場合は、
まず、第2図(a)、第3図(a)に示すように欠陥を
導入したい形状の一次成形体1を欠陥を導入したい場所
で2分割以上して、分割面2の所定位置に欠陥導入材3
を添加する。このときの−次成形圧は次工程の本成形圧
よりも低い圧力とする必要がある。次に、2分割以上し
た一次成形体を一体化し、第1図(b)に示すような単
純形状のものは機械プレスにより、また第2図(b)に
示すような複雑形状のものは静水圧プレスにより一体化
して、焼成すべき成形体4を得ている。When introducing defects randomly as a control method, a predetermined random defect density is obtained by controlling the volume ratio of the sieved defect-introducing material of a predetermined particle size and the ceramic powder. Also, when determining the location of defects,
First, as shown in FIGS. 2(a) and 3(a), the primary molded body 1 having a shape in which a defect is to be introduced is divided into two or more parts at the desired location, and the defect is placed at a predetermined position on the dividing surface 2. Introduction material 3
Add. The subsequent molding pressure at this time needs to be lower than the main molding pressure in the next step. Next, the primary molded bodies divided into two or more parts are integrated, and those with a simple shape as shown in Figure 1(b) are pressed by a mechanical press, and those with a complex shape as shown in Figure 2(b) are pressed statically. The molded body 4 to be fired is obtained by integrating with a hydraulic press.
次に、焼結助剤を分解しまた欠陥導入材が有機物である
場合は焼成前に有機物を酸化分解させる。Next, the sintering aid is decomposed, and if the defect-introducing material is an organic substance, the organic substance is oxidized and decomposed before firing.
加熱温度は、昇温速度50°C/時間以下で300’C
以上好ましくは450°C以上の一定温度まで昇温し、
この温度で5時間以上好ましくは24時間以上保持して
仮焼を行なう。このとき、セラミックス粉末が窒化珪素
や炭化珪素である場合は、酸化しやすいため800℃以
下で仮焼する必要がある。The heating temperature is 300'C with a heating rate of 50°C/hour or less.
The temperature is increased to a constant temperature of preferably 450°C or higher,
Calcination is carried out by holding at this temperature for 5 hours or more, preferably 24 hours or more. At this time, if the ceramic powder is silicon nitride or silicon carbide, it needs to be calcined at 800° C. or lower because it is easily oxidized.
最後に、各材料に最適な温度と雰囲気で本焼成して本発
明の欠陥を模擬してその大きさおよび位置を制御した空
孔または異物を有する保証試験用基準サンプルを得るこ
とができる。Finally, main firing is performed at the optimum temperature and atmosphere for each material to simulate the defects of the present invention to obtain a standard sample for guarantee testing that has pores or foreign matter whose size and position are controlled.
得られた保証試験用基準サンプルは、例えばX線探傷法
や超音波探傷法による非破壊検査においては、欠陥の大
きさが異なる複数のセラミック体を作製してこれらを測
定することにより最適な探傷条件を求めたり、探傷装置
の性能を知ったり、その結果基準として装置の較正を行
なったりすることできる。また、保証試験においては、
欠陥を制御した試験対象と同一形状の保証試験用基準サ
ンプルを作製してこれらを所定の試験法により測定する
ことにより、熱衝撃試験の温度やその材料を使用した製
品強度等を保証することが可能となる。The obtained reference test sample can be used for non-destructive testing using X-ray flaw detection or ultrasonic flaw detection, for example, by making multiple ceramic bodies with different defect sizes and measuring them. It is possible to determine the conditions, know the performance of the flaw detection equipment, and use the results as a reference for calibrating the equipment. In addition, in the guarantee test,
By creating standard samples for guarantee testing that have the same shape as the test object with controlled defects and measuring them using a prescribed test method, it is possible to guarantee the temperature of thermal shock tests and the strength of products using the materials. It becomes possible.
(発明の効果)
以上詳細に説明したところから明らかなように、本発明
の保証試験用基準サンプルおよびその製造方法によれば
、セラミック体内の空孔および異物を制御したテストピ
ースを得ることができ、このセラミック体を基準として
X線探傷法や超音波探傷法の非破壊検査装置の較正やセ
ラミック製品の保証試験を精度よ〈実施することが可能
となる。(Effects of the Invention) As is clear from the detailed explanation above, according to the standard sample for guarantee testing and the manufacturing method thereof of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a test piece in which pores and foreign matter in the ceramic body are controlled. Using this ceramic body as a reference, it becomes possible to calibrate non-destructive testing equipment for X-ray flaw detection or ultrasonic flaw detection, and to perform guarantee tests on ceramic products with high accuracy.
第1図は本発明の保証試験用基準サンプルを作製する一
例を示すフローチャート、
第2図(a) 、 (b)および第3図(a) 、 (
b)はそれぞれ欠陥位置を制御する方法を説明するため
の線図である。FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing an example of producing a standard sample for guarantee testing of the present invention; FIGS. 2(a), (b) and 3(a), (
b) is a diagram for explaining the method of controlling the defect position.
Claims (1)
ための基準サンプルであって、欠陥を模擬してその大き
さおよび位置を制御した空孔または異物を内部に有する
ことを特徴とする保証試験用基準サンプル。 2、有機物を焼成することにより欠陥を模擬した空孔を
形成することを特徴とする請求項1記載の保証試験用基
準サンプルの製造方法。 3、酸化物を配置することにより欠陥を模擬した異物を
形成することを特徴とする請求項1記載の保証試験用基
準サンプルの製造方法。[Scope of Claims] 1. A reference sample for use as a reference for non-destructive testing of ceramic bodies, etc., which has voids or foreign matter whose size and position are controlled to simulate defects inside. A standard sample for warranty testing featuring: 2. The method for producing a standard sample for a guarantee test according to claim 1, characterized in that voids simulating defects are formed by firing the organic substance. 3. The method for producing a reference sample for a guarantee test according to claim 1, characterized in that a foreign substance simulating a defect is formed by arranging an oxide.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1046566A JP2779199B2 (en) | 1989-03-01 | 1989-03-01 | Reference sample for guarantee test and method for producing the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1046566A JP2779199B2 (en) | 1989-03-01 | 1989-03-01 | Reference sample for guarantee test and method for producing the same |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH02228543A true JPH02228543A (en) | 1990-09-11 |
| JP2779199B2 JP2779199B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 |
Family
ID=12750870
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1046566A Expired - Fee Related JP2779199B2 (en) | 1989-03-01 | 1989-03-01 | Reference sample for guarantee test and method for producing the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2779199B2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2017106788A (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2017-06-15 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Reference element |
| JP2023014153A (en) * | 2017-06-29 | 2023-01-26 | 株式会社フジタ | Standard specimen for condition evaluation equipment |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS60252241A (en) * | 1984-05-29 | 1985-12-12 | Agency Of Ind Science & Technol | Standard ceramic sample for non-destructive inspection |
-
1989
- 1989-03-01 JP JP1046566A patent/JP2779199B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS60252241A (en) * | 1984-05-29 | 1985-12-12 | Agency Of Ind Science & Technol | Standard ceramic sample for non-destructive inspection |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2017106788A (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2017-06-15 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Reference element |
| JP2023014153A (en) * | 2017-06-29 | 2023-01-26 | 株式会社フジタ | Standard specimen for condition evaluation equipment |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2779199B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7320241B2 (en) | Ultrasonic inspection reference standard for composite materials | |
| EP1730503B1 (en) | Method for inspecting ceramic structures | |
| GB1453065A (en) | Method of testing a workpiece for internal defects | |
| US5587532A (en) | Method of measuring crack propagation in opaque materials | |
| JPH02228543A (en) | Reference sample for verifying test and manufacture thereof | |
| JPH056145B2 (en) | ||
| JP2006106011A (en) | Method and device for inspecting honeycomb structure | |
| EP0054101A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring solvent content of ceramic green sheets | |
| JPS6332142B2 (en) | ||
| Stander et al. | A novel multi-probe resistivity approach to inspect green-state metal powder compacts | |
| US4172315A (en) | Method of manufacturing a magnetic field sensitivity indicator apparatus for evaluating magnetic fields in parts during magnetic particle inspection | |
| Kurama et al. | Characterization of Silicate Ceramics Using Ultrasonics Test Method | |
| McClung et al. | On-Line NDE for Control and Modeling of Ceramic Processing | |
| TWI772056B (en) | Method for detecting carbon-containing pores in ceramics | |
| JPH01223341A (en) | Manufacture of reference test object for non-destructive inspection | |
| JPH0363706B2 (en) | ||
| Khandelwal | Non-destructive evaluation of structural ceramics by photoacoustic microscopy: Final report | |
| JPS59221657A (en) | Method for inspecting quality of ceramic product | |
| Khandelwal | Nondestructive evaluation of structural ceramics by photoacoustic microscopy | |
| Johnson et al. | Needs assessment for nondestructive testing and materials characterization for improved reliability in structural ceramics for heat engines | |
| Uchida et al. | Quantification of the internal structure in ceramic green bodies using computer-assisted optical imaging | |
| Koeingsberg et al. | Insight Into the Inside:(Ceramic NDE) | |
| CN120294038A (en) | A curing method and device for detecting internal defects of ceramic-based composite guide vane products | |
| Osterstock et al. | The Brazilian reliability test and micromechanical modelling for channelled cylinders of multiphased porous ceramics | |
| JPS6227646A (en) | Method for evaluating fatigue strength and/or fracture toughness of metallic and non-metallic powder product including defect and method for determining stress expanding coefficient |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |