JPH028688B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH028688B2
JPH028688B2 JP56073700A JP7370081A JPH028688B2 JP H028688 B2 JPH028688 B2 JP H028688B2 JP 56073700 A JP56073700 A JP 56073700A JP 7370081 A JP7370081 A JP 7370081A JP H028688 B2 JPH028688 B2 JP H028688B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
acid ester
soymilk
fatty acid
weight
added
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP56073700A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS57189657A (en
Inventor
Osamu Uchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Chemical Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd
Priority to JP56073700A priority Critical patent/JPS57189657A/en
Publication of JPS57189657A publication Critical patent/JPS57189657A/en
Publication of JPH028688B2 publication Critical patent/JPH028688B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Dairy Products (AREA)
  • Beans For Foods Or Fodder (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

本発明は、収斂性のない飲料豆乳の製造法に関
する。大豆を水又は熱水で抽出して得られる豆乳
は、良質の蛋白質および油を含有するアルカリ性
食品として早くから注目され、その消費量も次第
に増加しつつある。 しかし、豆乳は、風味の乏しさから、嗜好飲料
と言うより健康飲料のイメージが強く、到底牛乳
の歴史には及ばない。この欠点を改善するため
に、豆臭除去、苦味除去、臭のマスキング等に関
する研究が多くなされているが、豆乳の一つの欠
点である収斂性(以後「収斂味」と記す)の改善
については、例えば、豆乳に酵素グリコシダーゼ
を作用させて生成するフエノール物質を、イオン
交換樹脂で吸着除去する方法、あるいは大豆中に
本来含有されるグリコシダーゼの作用で、フエノ
ール物質の遊離するのを阻止するため、グリコシ
ダーゼ阻害物質を添加する方法等が挙げられる。 しかし、前者の方法では工程が煩雑であり、ま
た後者では、原料大豆に予め収斂味が発現したも
のについては有効ではなかつた。 収斂味は、市販の豆乳の何れにも感知され、特
にアイスクリーム等の豆乳加工品に於ては顕著で
ある。 本発明でいう収斂味とは、渋、エグを合せた表
現である。渋とは、唇、舌面、上顎中央部等に、
苔の生えたような感じとなり、且つ知覚の麻痺感
が持続することである。 この代表例として柿渋がある。豆乳の場合、我
慢出来る程度の渋の持続がある。又、エグとは、
咽喉部がチクチク痛むような、あるいは咳払いし
たような感じが持続することである。 収斂味は、豆乳を凝固させて作られる豆乳で
は、固形の粒子として口喉を通過するため問題な
く、主に飲料豆乳の場合に問題となる。 本発明者は、こうした飲料豆乳における収斂味
を積極的に解消、あるいは軽減するため鋭意検討
した結果、大豆から得られた豆乳に特定物質を添
加し、さらに該豆乳を特定の条件で処理すること
により本目的が達成できることを知見し、本発明
に到つた。 すなわち本発明の要旨は、大豆から得られた豆
乳に、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル、プロピレングライコ
ール脂肪酸エステル、グリセリン脂肪酸エステル
およびソルビタン脂肪酸エステルから選ばれる1
種以上の脂肪酸エステルを添加して、添加後1分
間以内に均質化するとともに、該均質化時または
均質化後に70℃以上の熱処理を施すことを特徴と
する飲料豆乳の製造法に存する。 本発明をさらに詳細に説明すると、本発明で対
象となる豆乳は、大豆を原料として得られる磨砕
後の粗豆乳およびオカラ分離後の豆乳、これらの
豆乳に従来法による脱臭操作を施したもの、ある
いは糖類、油または増粘剤等の添加された収斂味
のある調整豆乳(アイスクリーム、プリン等の混
合ミツクスを含む)も挙げられる。 本発明では、こうした豆乳に対し、脂肪酸エス
テルを添加する。 該脂肪酸エステルとしては、蔗糖脂肪酸エステ
ル、プロピレングライコール脂肪酸エステル、グ
リセリン脂肪酸エステルおよびソルビタン脂肪酸
エステルから選ばれる1種以上であつて、併用を
妨げない。とくに、蔗糖脂肪酸エステルの場合、
豆乳全量に対してトリ脂肪酸エステルの成分が
0.04重量%以上となるように配慮することが好ま
しい。 さらに、プロピレングライコール脂肪酸エステ
ルグリセリン脂肪酸エステルおよびソルビタン脂
肪酸エステルは、それぞれモノ脂肪酸エステルが
好んで使用される。脂肪酸エステルの脂肪酸とし
ては、例えばステアリン酸、パルミチン酸、ラウ
リン酸、オレイン酸等が挙げられるが、なかでも
ステアリン酸が好んで使用される。 こうした脂肪酸エステルの添加量は、豆乳の全
重量に対し、少くとも0.02重量%以上である。添
加量がこれより少ないと所期の効果は得られな
い。 例えば、通常の丸大豆から得られた豆乳に対し
ては、0.04重量%以上の添加が好ましい。また、
例えばグリセリンモノ脂肪酸エステルを添加する
場合、0.3重量%以上の添加で、豆乳の香味に影
響することがあるので、0.2重量%程度の添加が
好ましい。 こうした脂肪酸エステルを豆乳に添加する方法
は、直接に添加しても良いが、通常は水分散した
り、あるいは油または親油性溶媒に10重量%以上
好ましくは20重量%以上溶解して添加する。 該添加と同時に、又は添加直後に発泡を伴なう
周速190m/分以上の乱流撹拌又は、これと同等
以上の均質化能力のある機器で、1分以内に均質
化して微分散させることが好ましい。より好まし
くは、脂肪酸エステルを添加後、30秒以内に均質
化を終了させる。1分経過後の均質化は、実質的
には、収斂味の除去効果がない。該均質化に続い
て又は、均質化している間に豆乳に70℃以上、好
ましくは75℃以上の熱処理を施すことにより、収
斂味は解消する。単に脂肪酸エステルを豆乳に添
加しても1分以内の均質化および70℃以上の熱処
理を施さない場合は、収斂味の除去効果が低く、
したがつて本発明のような処理は、豆乳の収斂味
解消のための絶対必要条件である。 以上詳述したとおり、本発明のように大豆から
得られた豆乳に、特定の脂肪酸エステルを添加す
るとともに、特殊な処理を施すことにより、従来
不可避と考えられていた収斂味がほとんど解消さ
れた飲料豆乳が得られる。 以下本発明を実施例に基づいてより具体的に説
明するが、本発明はその要旨を超えない限り実施
例には限定されない。 なお以下において、%はとくにことわらない限
り、重量%を意味する。 実施例1および比較例1 水分4%、9〜20メツシユの剥皮した新しい荒
割大豆と、85℃の除酸素温水を1:8の割合(重
量)で混合しながら連続的に磨砕し、続いてオカ
ラを分離して粗豆乳を得た。この粗豆乳は、固形
分8.7%、粗蛋白8.7%であり、これをPH7.2に調整
した後、混合槽内で該粗豆乳に対し、食塩0.2重
量%、水飴2.5重量%およびホエー1重量%を添
加して充分に撹拌溶解させてから85℃に加熱し
た。 こうして加熱した粗豆乳と、該粗豆乳に対し、
蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−370(菱糖(株)製)を
0.15重量%(トリ脂肪酸エステル成分として0.07
重量%)となるように水に分散させた液と共に周
速630m/分で回転する密閉型均質分散機(井上
製作所製、サンドグラインダーのガラスビーズを
除き、回転シヤフトに有孔デイスクプレートを約
1cm間隔にセツトした容量5のサンドグライン
ダー)に、液滞溜時間30秒で通液した。ひき続
き、静置槽で泡を浮上させ、下部の液をプレート
熱交換機に通して130℃とし、直ちに真空缶中に
フラツシユさせて急冷し、PH6.7に調整された本
発明の飲料豆乳(実施例1)を得た。 一方、実施例1の前段で得られた粗豆乳を、同
様にPH7.2に調整し、さらに該粗豆乳を80℃に加
熱した後、食塩0.2重量%、水飴2.5重量%、ホエ
ー1重量%、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−370(菱
糖(株)製)0.15重量%(トリ脂肪酸エステル成分と
して0.07重量%)および市販の消泡剤・KM−
72F(信越化学(株)製、シリコン30%、ソルビタン
脂肪酸エステル1%および蔗糖脂肪酸エステル
0.5%を含有)0.017重量%をそれぞれ加えた。該
混液を、半径約6cmの3枚羽根(プロペラ型)2
組をセツトした邪魔板付の50容量のジヤーフア
ーメンター中で、N2ガスシールの嫌気条件下、
周速100m/分(260r.p.m.撹拌に伴なう泡の発生
が少なく、比較的ゆるやかな撹拌)で、10分間
(本発明に比べて極めて長時間)撹拌を続けた。 撹拌終了後、生じた少量の気泡を浮上させ、下
部の液をプレート熱交換機に通して130℃とし、
直ちに真空缶中にフラツシユさせて急冷し、比較
例1の豆乳を得た。 こうして得た実施例1および比較例1の豆乳に
ついて、嗜好試験のための3点比較法による官能
検査を実施した。 3点比較法とは、3点の検体の中、半端試料に
〇印、又半端試料と他の試料を比較して収斂味の
少ない方に〇印のつけさせ、且つ収斂味有無の備
考欄を設けて、21名からなるパネルでテストし
た。判定結果は、〇印の数で示した。(註;嗜好
試験のための3点比較の限界値は、危険率1%で
9である) 判定結果は、識別数18、実施例1の試料をよい
とした数16、何れにも〇印のないもの2であつ
た。又、実施例1について、収斂味は気にならな
いとした数12であつた。 以上の結果から実施例1では、周速630m/分、
約30秒の乱流撹拌により収斂性は大きく改善され
ているものと認められた。 なお、比較例1から、発泡を伴わない程度のゆ
るやかな撹拌混合を長時間行なつても均質化され
ず、したがつて収斂味は改善されていないことが
認められる。 実施例 2 実施例1の前段で得られた粗豆乳を、同様にPH
7.2に調整し、さらに80℃に加熱した後、該粗豆
乳に蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−370(菱糖(株)製)
を0.15重量%(トリ脂肪酸エステル成分として
0.07重量%)を予め水分散させた分散液を加え
た。該混液を、比較例1で使用したものと同じジ
ヤーフアーメンター中で、N2ガスシールの嫌気
条件下、周速300m/分(800r.p.m.)で20秒間撹
拌(発泡が激しい)後、周速190m/分とし、ジ
ヤケツトに蒸気を通じ、撹拌開始から1分後に95
℃として本発明の飲料豆乳を得た。 こうして得られた飲料豆乳と、比較例1で得た
試料豆乳を比較するため、6名のパネルにより2
回繰り返しによる2点比較法による官能検査を行
つた結果、全員実施例2の試料の方が収斂味がな
いとした。 このように、比較例1と同じ混合槽を使用して
も、発泡を伴う周速300m/分、20秒の短時間、
乱流撹拌による均質分散の効果の大きいことが認
められた。 実施例3〜5および比較例2 丸大豆を、アスコルビン酸0.05%およびポリ燐
酸ソーダ0.05%を含む浸漬水中で、16時間吸水さ
せた後水切りした。得られた吸水大豆をジヤケツ
ト付で密閉可能な磨砕機中に該吸水大豆の4倍量
(重量)の沸とう水とともに、投入して嫌気条件
下で磨砕し、続いてオカラを分離して粗蛋白質
3.6%、固形分7.9%の粗豆乳を得た。得られた粗
豆乳に、市販の消泡剤・KM−72F(信越化学(株)
製、シリコン30%、ソルビタン脂肪酸エステル1
%および蔗糖脂肪酸エステル0.5%含有)を0.017
重量%添加し、さらに後述する条件で均質化およ
び熱処理を行なつて飲料豆乳を得、条件の違いに
よる収斂味を判定した。その結果を表−1に示
す。 均質化機:Blender VA−10P(日立製作所(株)製)、
長い方の撹拌翼径約5.5mm 回転数:スライダツクにより調節し、羽根取付ナ
ツトの回転を、ベアリングで固定された棒を通
して上部に引出し、測定した。 又、液の撹拌は、同装置をつけた状態で行つ
た。 豆乳液量:95℃の豆乳200ml 添加脂肪酸エステル:グリセリンモノステアレー
ト、対豆乳に0.15重量%を水分散液として添加 加熱温度:78〜85℃(約1分間の撹拌の場合)
The present invention relates to a method for producing non-astringent drinking soymilk. Soybean milk obtained by extracting soybeans with water or hot water has long attracted attention as an alkaline food containing high-quality protein and oil, and its consumption is gradually increasing. However, due to its lack of flavor, soy milk has a strong image of being a health drink rather than a recreational drink, and it has never come close to the history of milk. In order to improve this drawback, many studies have been conducted on removing soy odor, bitterness, odor masking, etc. However, there is no improvement in astringency (hereinafter referred to as "astringent taste"), which is one of the drawbacks of soy milk. For example, a method of adsorbing and removing phenolic substances produced by the action of the enzyme glycosidase on soybean milk using an ion exchange resin, or a method of preventing the release of phenolic substances by the action of glycosidase originally contained in soybeans, Examples include a method of adding a glycosidase inhibitor. However, the former method requires complicated steps, and the latter method is not effective when the soybean material has already developed an astringent taste. Astringent taste can be detected in all commercially available soymilk, and is particularly noticeable in processed soymilk products such as ice cream. The term "astringent taste" as used in the present invention refers to a combination of astringency and harshness. Astringency refers to areas such as the lips, tongue surface, and the center of the upper jaw.
It feels like moss has grown on it, and a feeling of numbness persists. A typical example of this is persimmon tannin. In the case of soy milk, it has a tolerable astringency that lasts. Also, what is Egg?
A persistent tingling sensation in the throat or the sensation of coughing. Astringent taste is not a problem in soy milk made by coagulating soy milk because it passes through the mouth and throat as solid particles, but it is a problem mainly in the case of drinking soy milk. As a result of intensive studies to proactively eliminate or reduce the astringent taste in drinking soymilk, the present inventor has determined that a specific substance may be added to soymilk obtained from soybeans, and the soymilk may be further processed under specific conditions. The present inventors have discovered that this object can be achieved by the following methods, and have arrived at the present invention. That is, the gist of the present invention is to add 1 selected from sucrose fatty acid ester, propylene glycol fatty acid ester, glycerin fatty acid ester, and sorbitan fatty acid ester to soy milk obtained from soybeans.
A method for producing beverage soymilk, which comprises adding at least one fatty acid ester, homogenizing it within one minute after the addition, and subjecting it to heat treatment at 70°C or higher during or after the homogenization. To explain the present invention in more detail, the soymilk targeted by the present invention includes coarse soymilk obtained from soybeans after grinding, soymilk after okara separation, and soymilk obtained by deodorizing these soymilks using conventional methods. Alternatively, modified soymilk (including mixed mixes of ice cream, pudding, etc.) with an astringent taste to which sugars, oils, or thickeners are added may also be mentioned. In the present invention, a fatty acid ester is added to such soymilk. The fatty acid ester is one or more selected from sucrose fatty acid ester, propylene glycol fatty acid ester, glycerin fatty acid ester, and sorbitan fatty acid ester, and can be used in combination. In particular, in the case of sucrose fatty acid ester,
The amount of trifatty acid esters in the total amount of soymilk
It is preferable to take care so that the content is 0.04% by weight or more. Furthermore, propylene glycol fatty acid ester glycerin fatty acid ester and sorbitan fatty acid ester are each preferably used as a monofatty acid ester. Examples of the fatty acid of the fatty acid ester include stearic acid, palmitic acid, lauric acid, and oleic acid, among which stearic acid is preferably used. The amount of such fatty acid ester added is at least 0.02% by weight based on the total weight of soymilk. If the amount added is less than this, the desired effect cannot be obtained. For example, it is preferable to add 0.04% by weight or more to soybean milk obtained from regular whole soybeans. Also,
For example, when adding glycerin monofatty acid ester, addition of 0.3% by weight or more may affect the flavor of soymilk, so addition of about 0.2% by weight is preferable. These fatty acid esters may be added directly to soybean milk, but usually they are dispersed in water or dissolved in oil or a lipophilic solvent in an amount of 10% by weight or more, preferably 20% by weight or more. At the same time or immediately after the addition, homogenize and finely disperse it within 1 minute using turbulent stirring with foaming at a circumferential speed of 190 m/min or more, or using equipment with homogenization capacity equivalent to or higher than this. is preferred. More preferably, homogenization is completed within 30 seconds after adding the fatty acid ester. Homogenization after 1 minute has not substantially removed the astringent taste. The astringent taste can be eliminated by subjecting soybean milk to a heat treatment at 70° C. or higher, preferably 75° C. or higher, subsequent to or during the homogenization. Even if fatty acid ester is simply added to soymilk, if it is not homogenized within 1 minute and heat treated at 70°C or higher, the astringent taste removal effect will be low.
Therefore, the treatment according to the present invention is an absolutely necessary condition for eliminating the astringent taste of soybean milk. As detailed above, by adding a specific fatty acid ester to soybean milk obtained from soybeans as in the present invention and subjecting it to special treatment, the astringent taste, which was previously thought to be unavoidable, has been almost eliminated. Drinkable soy milk is obtained. The present invention will be described in more detail below based on Examples, but the present invention is not limited to the Examples unless it exceeds the gist thereof. In addition, in the following, % means weight % unless otherwise specified. Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 Moisture: 4%, 9 to 20 mesh pieces of new peeled, coarsely cracked soybeans were continuously ground while mixing 85°C oxygen-free hot water at a ratio of 1:8 (by weight). Subsequently, okara was separated to obtain crude soy milk. This crude soy milk has a solid content of 8.7% and a crude protein of 8.7%. After adjusting the pH to 7.2, the crude soy milk is mixed with 0.2% by weight of salt, 2.5% by weight of starch syrup, and 1% by weight of whey in a mixing tank. % was added, thoroughly stirred and dissolved, and then heated to 85°C. For the coarse soy milk heated in this way and the coarse soy milk,
Sucrose fatty acid ester SE-370 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.)
0.15% by weight (0.07% as trifatty acid ester component)
A closed-type homogeneous dispersion machine (manufactured by Inoue Seisakusho) that rotates at a circumferential speed of 630 m/min with a liquid dispersed in water so that the liquid is dispersed in water so that the amount of water is 1.5% by weight) (manufactured by Inoue Manufacturing Co., Ltd.). The liquid was passed through a sand grinder (capacity 5) set at intervals of 30 seconds with a residence time of 30 seconds. Subsequently, the bubbles are floated in a static tank, and the liquid at the bottom is passed through a plate heat exchanger to 130°C, and immediately flashed into a vacuum can to rapidly cool the beverage soymilk of the present invention (adjusted to pH 6.7). Example 1) was obtained. On the other hand, the crude soymilk obtained in the first step of Example 1 was adjusted to pH 7.2 in the same manner, and the crude soymilk was further heated to 80°C, followed by 0.2% by weight of salt, 2.5% by weight of starch syrup, and 1% by weight of whey. , sucrose fatty acid ester SE-370 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.) 0.15% by weight (0.07% by weight as trifatty acid ester component) and a commercially available antifoaming agent KM-
72F (manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., 30% silicone, 1% sorbitan fatty acid ester, and sucrose fatty acid ester)
0.5%) and 0.017% by weight were added respectively. The mixed liquid was heated using three blades (propeller type) with a radius of approximately 6 cm.
Under anaerobic conditions with a N2 gas seal in a 50-capacity jar fermenter with a baffle plate,
Stirring was continued at a circumferential speed of 100 m/min (relatively gentle stirring with little generation of bubbles associated with 260 rpm stirring) for 10 minutes (extremely long time compared to the present invention). After stirring, a small amount of bubbles were raised to the surface, and the liquid at the bottom was passed through a plate heat exchanger to 130°C.
Immediately, it was flashed into a vacuum can and rapidly cooled to obtain soymilk of Comparative Example 1. The soybean milk of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 thus obtained was subjected to a sensory test using a three-point comparison method for preference testing. The three-point comparison method is to mark the odd sample out of three samples, and to compare the odd sample with other samples and mark the one with the least astringent taste, and to write a note in the comments section to indicate whether or not there is an astringent taste. was set up and tested on a panel of 21 people. The judgment results are indicated by the number of ○ marks. (Note: The limit value for a three-point comparison for a preference test is 9 with a risk rate of 1%.) The judgment results are 18 for the number of identifications and 16 for the sample of Example 1, all marked with a circle. It was the one without 2. Regarding Example 1, number 12 indicated that the astringent taste was not a concern. From the above results, in Example 1, the circumferential speed was 630 m/min,
It was recognized that the astringency was greatly improved by turbulent stirring for about 30 seconds. In addition, from Comparative Example 1, it is recognized that even if gentle stirring and mixing without foaming is performed for a long time, homogenization is not achieved, and therefore, the astringent taste is not improved. Example 2 The coarse soymilk obtained in the first step of Example 1 was similarly PH
7.2 and further heated to 80°C, the crude soymilk was mixed with sucrose fatty acid ester SE-370 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.).
0.15% by weight (as trifatty acid ester component)
A dispersion liquid in which 0.07% by weight) was previously dispersed in water was added. The mixed liquid was stirred for 20 seconds at a circumferential speed of 300 m/min (800 rpm) in the same jar fermenter as used in Comparative Example 1 under anaerobic conditions with a N2 gas seal (foaming was intense). At a circumferential speed of 190 m/min, steam was passed through the jacket, and 95 m/min was reached 1 minute after the start of stirring.
The drinking soymilk of the present invention was obtained as a temperature. In order to compare the drinking soymilk thus obtained with the sample soymilk obtained in Comparative Example 1, a panel of six people
As a result of a sensory test using a two-point comparison method with multiple repetitions, all participants agreed that the sample of Example 2 had less astringent taste. In this way, even if the same mixing tank as in Comparative Example 1 is used, foaming occurs at a circumferential speed of 300 m/min for a short period of 20 seconds.
It was recognized that the effect of homogeneous dispersion by turbulent stirring is large. Examples 3 to 5 and Comparative Example 2 Whole soybeans were soaked in water containing 0.05% ascorbic acid and 0.05% sodium polyphosphate for 16 hours, and then drained. The obtained water-absorbed soybeans were put into a sealable grinder with a jacket, together with boiling water in an amount four times the amount (weight) of the water-absorbed soybeans, and ground under anaerobic conditions.Then, okara was separated. crude protein
Crude soy milk with a solid content of 3.6% and a solid content of 7.9% was obtained. A commercially available antifoaming agent, KM-72F (Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) was added to the obtained coarse soymilk.
Made of 30% silicone, sorbitan fatty acid ester 1
% and 0.5% sucrose fatty acid ester) is 0.017
% by weight was added, and homogenization and heat treatment were performed under the conditions described below to obtain drinking soymilk, and the astringent taste was determined under different conditions. The results are shown in Table-1. Homogenizer: Blender VA-10P (manufactured by Hitachi, Ltd.),
Longer stirring blade diameter: approximately 5.5 mm Rotation speed: Adjusted with a slider, and the rotation of the blade mounting nut was measured by pulling it upward through a rod fixed with a bearing. In addition, the liquid was stirred with the same device attached. Soy milk liquid volume: 200 ml of soy milk at 95°C Added fatty acid ester: Glycerin monostearate, 0.15% by weight of soy milk added as an aqueous dispersion Heating temperature: 78 to 85°C (for about 1 minute of stirring)

【表】 表−1のうち、収斂味評価の記号は、比較例1
の試料の収斂味と同等をとして比較した評価
で、+は減少、−は殆んど感じない又は、非常に少
い事を表わす。本実施例の結果から、混合容器を
ミニブレンダーに変化しても、発泡を伴う周速
190m/分以上の乱流撹拌により、1分以内に均
質化させる事で、収斂味緩和効果の認められる事
が判明した。 一方、実施例3〜5および比較例2で得られた
ものと同じ豆乳を、一夜熟成したのち、豆乳の液
表面をスパチラーですくい、顕微鏡で観察したと
ころ、表−2に示すような、GMS(グリセリンモ
ノステアレート)の粒子が発見された。
[Table] In Table-1, the astringency evaluation symbol is Comparative Example 1
In this evaluation, the astringent taste is compared with the sample's astringent taste. The results of this example show that even if the mixing container is changed to a mini-blender, the circumferential speed with foaming
It was found that by homogenizing within 1 minute by turbulent stirring at 190 m/min or more, an astringent taste mitigating effect was observed. On the other hand, after aging the same soymilk as that obtained in Examples 3 to 5 and Comparative Example 2 overnight, the liquid surface of the soymilk was scooped with a spa chiller and observed with a microscope. As shown in Table 2, GMS (glycerol monostearate) particles were discovered.

【表】 表−2から明らかなように、実施例3〜5で
は、均質化が充分行なわれているのに対し、比較
例2ではGMSの粗大粒子が残つており、均質化
されていないことが判る。この場合、豆乳を入れ
ている透明容器の器壁に、粒子が付着しているこ
とが肉眼で観察できる。 実施例 6 丸大豆を、アスコルビン酸0.05%およびポリ燐
酸ソーダ0.05%を含む浸漬水中で、16時間吸水さ
せた後水切りした。得られた吸水大豆をジヤケツ
ト付で密閉可能な磨砕機中に該吸水大豆の4倍量
(重量)の沸とう水とともに、投入して嫌気条件
下で磨砕し、オカラを分離した。 さらに、オカラを少量の水で洗い、洗い水を合
して、粗蛋白質3.2%、粗脂肪1.5%の粗豆乳を得
た。 得られた粗豆乳に対し、モノグリセライド・エ
マルジ−MS(理研ビタミン(株)製)を0.04%、0.05
%、0.2%および0.3%(それぞれ重量%)となる
ような水分散液をそれぞれ別個に添加し、それら
について直ちに実施例2と全く同じ条件で均質化
(均質化時の温度73〜95℃)した後冷却し、室温
下5時間放置して、それぞれA、B、CおよびD
の試料豆乳を作成した。 また、モノグリセライドを添加せず、かわりに
水を添加した他は、A〜Dと全く同一条件で作つ
た試料豆乳をEとした。 試料豆乳A〜Eにつき、(AE)、(BE)、(CE)、
(CD)の組合せで、収斂味について、2点比較法
で官能検査を行つた。官能検査は、パネル6名、
パネルの繰返し3回、判定数計18の条件で行つ
た。 (判定回数18では、危険率5%で14、1%では
15の限界値以上で有意) 判定は、収斂味の少ない方に〇印をつけさせ、
結果は〇印の数で記した。その結果、 AE比較 A:15、E:1、差なしとした数2 BE比較 B:18、E:0 CE比較 C:18、E:0 CD比較 C:5、D:3、差なしとした数10(判
定数18のうち13はDに異臭味強いと付記されて
いる。) 本実験において、モノグリ0.04重量%添加で、
収斂味軽減の効果が認められている。収斂味の官
能検査は、収斂味に持続性があるため、苦通を伴
う作業であるが、0.05%以上の添加では、全員収
斂味減少効果を認める結果が示された。又0.3%
添加の場合、殆んど収斂味は感じられないが、異
臭味の発現を訴えて居り、収斂味以外のマイナス
効果に問題が残る。又均質化に際し、固い泡の発
泡があり、問題がある。 比較例 3および4 実施例6と同様にして得た吸水大豆を、該吸水
大豆の4倍量(重量)の加水量になるように加水
しながら粉砕した後、蒸煮釜中で95℃まで加熱す
るに当り、市販の消泡剤としてエマルジースーパ
ー(理研ビタミン(株)製、モノグリセライト90%、
CaCO35%、大豆燐脂質4.3%およびシリコーン
0.7%の組成)を呉に対して0.15重量%添加して
さらに、比較例2と同じ条件で均質化して豆乳
(比較例3試料)を作成した。 一方、別の消泡剤・ニツサンデイスフオーム
FD−1(日本油脂(株)製、ソルビタン脂肪酸エステ
ル70.5%、グリセリン脂肪酸エステル1.3%、プ
ロピレングリコール24.0%、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル
1.2%およびシリコーン3.0%の組成)に変えた他
は、比較例2と同じ条件で均質化して豆乳(比較
例4試料)を作成した。 前記2種の試料を、一夜冷蔵庫で保管した後、
これら試料と実施例6で使用した試料豆乳Eにつ
き、(比較例3試料とE)、(比較例4試料とE)
の組合せで、実施例6と全く同様に2点比較法で
官能検査を行なつた。その結果、 (比較例3試料とE)比較例3試料:5、E:
3、(差なしとした数10) (比較例4試料とE)比較例4試料:4、E:
1(差なしとした数13) の判定結果がえられた。従来の消泡剤としての使
用法のように、発泡を伴わない自然対流に近い撹
拌では殆んど収斂味の改善効果は認められない。 実施例 7 剥皮大豆を水に浸漬することなく、実施例6で
使用した磨砕機中に、該剥皮大豆の8倍量(重
量)の90%熱水とともに投入して磨砕し、オカラ
を分離した。さらに、オカラを熱水で洗つて、洗
い液を合せて粗蛋白質2.1%、粗脂肪1.0%の粗豆
乳を得た。 得られた粗豆乳に対し、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・
SE−1170(菱糖(株)製)を0.5重量%(トリステア
リン酸エステル含量として0.05重量%)添加した
もの、一方、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−1570(菱
糖(株)製)を0.1重量%(トリステアリン酸エステ
ル含量として0.05重量%)添加したものをそれぞ
れ実施例6と全く同じ条件で均質化した後、一夜
冷蔵庫に保存して試料豆乳FおよびGを作成し
た。これら試料と、実施例6で使用した試料豆乳
Eにつき、(EF)、(EG)の組合せで、実施例6
と全く同様に、2点比較法で官能検査を行なつ
た。その結果、 EFの組合せ、E:0、F:16、差なしとした
数2 EGの組合せ、E:0、G:15、差なしとした
数3 であり、蔗糖脂肪酸エステルの添加に、収斂味減
少の効果があることが示された。又実施例6と同
様、均質化時の発泡は大きい。 実施例 8および9 剥皮大豆を水に浸漬することなく、実施例6で
使用した磨砕機中に、該剥皮大豆の8倍量(重
量)の95℃の熱水とともに投入して嫌気条件で磨
砕し、さらにオカラを分離して粗蛋白質3.7%、
粗脂肪1.9%の粗豆乳を得た。該粗豆乳に対し、
プロピレングライコール脂肪酸エステル・ホモテ
ツクスPS−90(理研ビタミン(株)製)が80%、蔗糖
脂肪酸エステル・SE−570(菱糖(株)製)が20%の
混合物を水分散の形で0.1重量%添加し、直ちに
実施例5と同じ条件で均質化(均質化時の温度70
〜95℃)した後冷却し、室温下3時間放置して、
実施例8の試料豆乳(H)を作成した。 一方、ソルビタン脂肪酸エステル・スパン60
(理研ビタミン(株)製)が80%と前記蔗糖脂肪酸エ
ステル・SE−570が20%の混合物を水分散の形で
豆乳に添加した他は、全く同様にして、実施例9
の試料豆乳(I)を作成した。 さらに、比較のために脂肪酸エステル等を全く
添加せず、水のみを加えた他は、全く同様にして
試料豆乳(J)を作成した。 これら試料豆乳につき、(HJ)、(IJ)の組合せ
で、実施例6と同様に2点比較法で、渋味につい
て官能試験を行つた結果 HJの組合せ、H:15、J:0、差なしとした
数3 IJの組合せ、I:16、J:1、差なしとした数
1 であり、プロピレングライコール脂肪酸エステル
及びソルビタン脂肪酸エステルを主体とする
(註;単独使用の場合、水分散性悪く、蔗糖脂肪
酸エステルを2割混合)界面活性剤に収斂味減少
の効果が見られた。又、何れの場合も均質化時固
い発泡が見られた。 実施例 10 実施例8および9の前段と同様にして得た粗豆
乳に対し、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−370(菱糖
(株)製)を0.1重量%(トリステアリン酸エステル
として0.44重量%)水分散の形で添加し、直ちに
実施例5と同じ条件で均質化(温度86〜95℃、30
秒間)した後冷却し、一夜冷蔵庫に保存して、実
施例10の試料豆乳(K)を作成した。該試料豆乳(K)
と、実施例8および9で使用した試料豆乳(J)につ
き、実施例6と全く同様に、2点比較法で官能検
査を行なつた。 その結果、J:0、K:18であり、収斂味がほ
とんどない飲料豆乳が得られることが判つた。 実施例 11および12 実施例8および9の前段と同様にして得た粗豆
乳に対し、大豆サラダ油(モノグリセライド20%
含有)を3重量%を添加し、直ちに実施例5と同
じ条件で均質化(温度80〜95℃)した後冷却し、
一夜冷蔵庫に保存して、実施例11の試料豆乳(L)を
作成した。 一方、別の大豆サラダ油(蔗糖脂肪酸エステ
ル・SE−370(菱糖(株)製)を20%含有)の3重量
%添加に変えた他は、全く同様にして実施例12の
試料豆乳(M)を作成した。 これら試料と、実施例8および9で使用した試
料豆乳(J)につき、(JL)、(JM)の組合せで、実
施例6と全く同様に、2点比較法で官能検査を行
なつた。 その結果は、 JLの組合せ J:1、L:15、差なしとした
数2 JMの組合せ J:0、M:16、差なしとした
数1 であつた。 比較例 5 蔗糖脂肪酸エステルを、SE−1570(菱糖(株)製)
とし、その添加量を0.2重量%(トリステアリン
酸エステル含量として0.01重量%)に変えた他
は、実施例2と全く同様にして飲料豆乳を得た。 得られた豆乳を実施例1と全く同様にして、3
点比較法で官能検査を行なつたが、収斂性の改善
は見られなかつた。 比較例 6 実施例8および9と同様にして得た粗豆乳に対
し、大豆サラダ油(モノグリセライド10%含有)
を3重量%添加し、直ちに実施例5と同じ条件で
均質化(温度76〜95℃)した後冷却し、一夜冷蔵
庫に保存して試料豆乳を得、該豆乳と実施例8で
使用した試料豆乳(J)との組合せで実施例6と全く
同様に2点比較法で官能検査を行なつたが、両者
の差はなかつた。 この結果から、豆乳に油を添加する場合、添加
油に対し、通常使用されている最高限度10%未満
の界面活性剤の添加では、収斂味改善の効果は見
られないことが示唆された。(界面活性剤の添加
量は、豆乳に対し0.3重量%と計算出来る。) 実施例 13 実施例8および9の前段と同様にして得た粗豆
乳に対し、蔗糖脂肪酸エステル・SE−370(菱糖
(株)製)を0.05重量%となるようにした水分散液を
添加し、直ちに実施例5と同様の条件で均質化
(温度80〜96℃)し、さらにコーンオイル(蔗糖
脂肪酸エステル・SE−370を5重量%含有)を3
重量%添加し、直ちに実施例5と同様の条件で均
質化した後、一夜冷蔵庫に保存して試料豆乳
(N)を作成した。 該試料豆乳(N)と、実施例8および9で使用
した試料豆乳(J)につき、実施例6と全く同様に2
点比較法で官能検査を行なつた。 その結果は、J:0、N:15、差なしとした数
3であつた。 本実施例の結果から、油乳化用界面活性剤の作
用と渋味除去に対する界面活性剤の作用は、異な
るものと判断される。 実施例 14 実施例6の前段と同様にして得た吸水大豆と該
吸水大豆の3倍量(重量)の沸とう水を用いた他
は、実施例6と全く同様にして粗豆乳を得た。該
粗豆乳は、粗蛋白質4.8%、粗脂肪2.4%であつ
た。 得られた粗豆乳に対し、モノグリライド10倍量
を含むコーンオイル0.15%(モノグリセライド
0.135wt%)を溶解させた溶液を添加しながら、
かつジヤケツトを加熱する均質化機を通して実施
例1と同じ条件で均質化(温度65〜95℃)し、一
夜冷蔵庫に保存して試料豆乳(P)を作成した。 一方、粗豆乳にコーンオイル0.015重量%のみ
を添加し、直ちに実施例1と同じ条件で均質化
(温度65〜95℃)し、さらに同様にして試料豆乳
(Q)を作成した。該試料豆乳(P)と(Q)に
つき、QPQの組合せで、11名のパネルにより2
回繰返して3点比較法による官能検査を行なつ
た。 その結果、正しく識別した回数19、そのうち
(P)が良いとした数は16であり、何れも高度に
有意である。 本実施例により、少量の油を用いるとモノグリ
セライド溶液の流動性がよくなり、添加しやすい
事及び収斂味除去作用に対する添加油の阻害も殆
んど認められない事が判明し、且つ豆乳の品質も
向上しいる結果が示された。
[Table] As is clear from Table 2, in Examples 3 to 5, homogenization was sufficiently performed, whereas in Comparative Example 2, coarse particles of GMS remained and homogenization was not performed. I understand. In this case, it can be observed with the naked eye that particles are attached to the wall of the transparent container containing soymilk. Example 6 Whole soybeans were soaked in water containing 0.05% ascorbic acid and 0.05% sodium polyphosphate for 16 hours, and then drained. The obtained water-absorbed soybeans were placed in a sealable grinder with a jacket, together with boiling water in an amount four times the amount (weight) of the water-absorbed soybeans, and ground under anaerobic conditions to separate okara. Furthermore, okara was washed with a small amount of water, and the washing water was combined to obtain crude soy milk with a crude protein content of 3.2% and a crude fat content of 1.5%. Monoglyceride emulsion MS (manufactured by Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd.) was added at 0.04% and 0.05% to the obtained crude soymilk.
%, 0.2% and 0.3% (each by weight) were added separately, and immediately homogenized under exactly the same conditions as in Example 2 (temperature during homogenization: 73-95°C). After that, it was cooled and left at room temperature for 5 hours to form A, B, C and D.
Sample soymilk was prepared. Sample soymilk E was prepared under exactly the same conditions as A to D, except that water was added instead of monoglyceride. For sample soymilk A to E, (AE), (BE), (CE),
A sensory test was conducted on the astringent taste of the combination of (CD) using a two-point comparison method. The sensory test was conducted by a panel of 6 people,
The panel was repeated three times, making a total of 18 judgments. (When the number of judgments is 18, the risk rate is 5% and 14, and the risk rate is 1%.
(Significant above the limit value of 15) Judgment is made by marking the one with the least astringent taste,
The results are indicated by the number of ○ marks. As a result, AE comparison A: 15, E: 1, number 2 with no difference BE comparison B: 18, E: 0 CE comparison C: 18, E: 0 CD comparison C: 5, D: 3, no difference The number of judgments was 10 (out of 18 judgments, 13 were marked with D as having a strong off-flavor taste.) In this experiment, with the addition of 0.04% by weight of Monoguri,
It has been recognized to be effective in reducing astringent taste. Sensory testing of astringent taste is a difficult task because the astringent taste is long-lasting, but all the results showed that when 0.05% or more was added, all participants acknowledged the effect of reducing the astringent taste. Also 0.3%
In the case of addition, almost no astringent taste is felt, but there are complaints of off-flavor and taste, and there remains a problem with negative effects other than the astringent taste. Further, during homogenization, hard foam is generated, which is a problem. Comparative Examples 3 and 4 Water-absorbed soybeans obtained in the same manner as in Example 6 were crushed while adding water to a water amount four times the amount (weight) of the water-absorbed soybeans, and then heated to 95°C in a steamer. For this purpose, we used Emulgy Super (manufactured by Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd., 90% monoglycerite) as a commercially available antifoaming agent.
CaCO3 5%, soy phospholipid 4.3% and silicone
Soybean milk (composition of 0.7%) was added in an amount of 0.15% by weight based on the bean paste and homogenized under the same conditions as Comparative Example 2 to prepare soymilk (Comparative Example 3 sample). On the other hand, another antifoaming agent, Nitsusan Deisfoam
FD-1 (manufactured by NOF Corporation, 70.5% sorbitan fatty acid ester, 1.3% glycerin fatty acid ester, 24.0% propylene glycol, sucrose fatty acid ester)
Soy milk (Comparative Example 4 sample) was homogenized under the same conditions as Comparative Example 2, except that the composition was changed to 1.2% and 3.0% silicone. After storing the two types of samples in the refrigerator overnight,
Regarding these samples and sample soymilk E used in Example 6, (Comparative Example 3 Sample and E), (Comparative Example 4 Sample and E)
A sensory test was conducted using the two-point comparison method in exactly the same manner as in Example 6. As a result, (Comparative Example 3 sample and E) Comparative Example 3 sample: 5, E:
3. (Number 10 with no difference) (Comparative example 4 sample and E) Comparative example 4 sample: 4, E:
A judgment result of 1 (number 13 assuming no difference) was obtained. As in the conventional method of use as an antifoaming agent, stirring similar to natural convection without foaming hardly improves the astringent taste. Example 7 Without immersing the peeled soybeans in water, they were placed into the grinder used in Example 6 together with 90% hot water of 8 times the amount (weight) of the peeled soybeans and ground to separate okara. did. Furthermore, okara was washed with hot water and the washing liquid was combined to obtain crude soy milk with a crude protein content of 2.1% and a crude fat content of 1.0%. The obtained crude soymilk is treated with sucrose fatty acid ester and
0.5% by weight of SE-1170 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.) (0.05% by weight as tristearate ester content), and 0.1% by weight of sucrose fatty acid ester SE-1570 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.) % (0.05% by weight as tristearic acid ester content) were homogenized under exactly the same conditions as in Example 6, and then stored in a refrigerator overnight to prepare sample soymilk F and G. With the combination of these samples and sample soymilk E used in Example 6, (EF) and (EG), Example 6
In exactly the same manner as above, a sensory test was conducted using the two-point comparison method. As a result, the combination of EF, E: 0, F: 16, number 2 with no difference, the combination of EG, E: 0, G: 15, number 3 with no difference, and the addition of sucrose fatty acid ester resulted in convergence. It has been shown to be effective in reducing taste. Also, similar to Example 6, foaming during homogenization was large. Examples 8 and 9 The dehulled soybeans were placed into the grinder used in Example 6 together with 95°C hot water in an amount 8 times the amount (weight) of the dehulled soybeans and polished under anaerobic conditions without soaking them in water. Crushed and further separated okara yields 3.7% crude protein.
Crude soy milk with a crude fat content of 1.9% was obtained. For the coarse soy milk,
0.1 weight of a mixture of 80% propylene glycol fatty acid ester Homotex PS-90 (manufactured by Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd.) and 20% sucrose fatty acid ester SE-570 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.) in the form of water dispersion. % and immediately homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 5 (temperature during homogenization: 70°C).
~95℃), then cooled and left at room temperature for 3 hours.
Sample soymilk (H) of Example 8 was prepared. On the other hand, sorbitan fatty acid ester span 60
Example 9 was carried out in exactly the same manner except that a mixture of 80% sucrose fatty acid ester SE-570 (manufactured by Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd.) and 20% sucrose fatty acid ester SE-570 was added to soymilk in the form of water dispersion.
Sample soymilk (I) was prepared. Furthermore, for comparison, a sample soymilk (J) was prepared in exactly the same manner except that no fatty acid ester or the like was added and only water was added. A sensory test was conducted on the astringency of these sample soymilk samples using the combination of (HJ) and (IJ) using the same two-point comparison method as in Example 6. The number 3 is a combination of IJ with no difference, I: 16, J: 1, and the number 1 with no difference, and is mainly composed of propylene glycol fatty acid ester and sorbitan fatty acid ester (Note: When used alone, water dispersibility However, the effect of reducing the astringent taste was observed in the surfactant (mixed with 20% sucrose fatty acid ester). Also, in all cases, hard foaming was observed during homogenization. Example 10 Crude soy milk obtained in the same manner as in the first part of Examples 8 and 9 was treated with sucrose fatty acid ester SE-370 (sucrose fatty acid ester).
0.1% by weight (0.44% by weight as tristearate) was added in the form of water dispersion, and immediately homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 5 (temperature 86-95℃, 30% by weight).
2 seconds), then cooled and stored in a refrigerator overnight to prepare sample soymilk (K) of Example 10. The sample soymilk (K)
The sample soymilk (J) used in Examples 8 and 9 was subjected to a sensory test using a two-point comparison method in exactly the same manner as in Example 6. As a result, it was found that drinking soymilk with J: 0 and K: 18 and almost no astringent taste could be obtained. Examples 11 and 12 Soybean salad oil (monoglyceride 20%
3 wt.
The sample soymilk (L) of Example 11 was prepared by storing it in the refrigerator overnight. On the other hand, the sample soymilk of Example 12 (M )It was created. For these samples and the sample soymilk (J) used in Examples 8 and 9, a sensory test was conducted using a combination of (JL) and (JM) using a two-point comparison method in exactly the same manner as in Example 6. The results were: JL combination J: 1, L: 15, number 2 with no difference; JM combination J: 0, M: 16, number 1 with no difference. Comparative Example 5 Sucrose fatty acid ester was used as SE-1570 (manufactured by Ryoto Co., Ltd.)
Beverage soymilk was obtained in the same manner as in Example 2, except that the amount added was changed to 0.2% by weight (0.01% by weight as tristearate content). The obtained soymilk was treated in exactly the same manner as in Example 1, and 3
A sensory test was conducted using a point comparison method, but no improvement in astringency was observed. Comparative Example 6 Soybean salad oil (containing 10% monoglyceride) was added to crude soymilk obtained in the same manner as in Examples 8 and 9.
3% by weight was added, immediately homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 5 (temperature 76 to 95°C), cooled, and stored in the refrigerator overnight to obtain sample soymilk, which was combined with the sample used in Example 8. A sensory test was conducted in combination with soy milk (J) using a two-point comparison method in exactly the same manner as in Example 6, but there was no difference between the two. This result suggests that when oil is added to soymilk, no astringent taste improvement effect is observed when a surfactant is added to the added oil in an amount less than the commonly used maximum limit of 10%. (The amount of surfactant added can be calculated as 0.3% by weight based on the soy milk.) Example 13 To the crude soy milk obtained in the same manner as in the first part of Examples 8 and 9, sucrose fatty acid ester SE-370 (diamond) was added. sugar
An aqueous dispersion of 0.05% by weight of corn oil (Sucrose fatty acid ester, SE -370 (contains 5% by weight)
% by weight was added, immediately homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 5, and then stored in a refrigerator overnight to prepare a sample soymilk (N). The sample soymilk (N) and the sample soymilk (J) used in Examples 8 and 9 were treated in exactly the same manner as in Example 6.
A sensory test was conducted using the point comparison method. The results were number 3 with J: 0, N: 15, and no difference. From the results of this example, it is determined that the effect of the surfactant for oil emulsification and the effect of the surfactant in removing astringency are different. Example 14 Rough soy milk was obtained in the same manner as in Example 6, except that water-absorbed soybeans obtained in the same manner as in the first part of Example 6 and boiling water in an amount three times the amount (weight) of the water-absorbed soybeans were used. . The crude soymilk contained 4.8% crude protein and 2.4% crude fat. Add 0.15% corn oil (monoglyceride) containing 10 times the amount of monoglycerides to the obtained crude soymilk.
While adding a solution in which 0.135wt%) was dissolved,
The soymilk sample (P) was then homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 1 (temperature 65-95°C) through a homogenizer that heats the jacket, and stored in a refrigerator overnight to prepare a sample soymilk (P). On the other hand, only 0.015% by weight of corn oil was added to crude soymilk, which was immediately homogenized under the same conditions as in Example 1 (temperature: 65-95°C), and a sample soymilk (Q) was prepared in the same manner. For the sample soymilk (P) and (Q), 2
A sensory test using a three-point comparison method was repeated several times. As a result, the number of times of correct identification was 19, of which the number of times (P) was good was 16, all of which were highly significant. This example revealed that using a small amount of oil improves the fluidity of the monoglyceride solution, making it easier to add, and that the added oil hardly interferes with the astringent taste removal effect, and also improves the quality of soymilk. The results showed that the results also improved.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 大豆から得られた豆乳に、蔗糖脂肪酸エステ
ル、プロピレングライコール脂肪酸エステル、グ
リセリン脂肪酸エステルおよびソルビタン脂肪酸
エステルから選ばれる1種以上の脂肪酸エステル
を添加して、添加後1分間以内に均質化するとと
もに、該均質化時または均質化後に70℃以上の熱
処理を施すことを特徴とする飲料豆乳の製造法。 2 豆乳に添加する脂肪酸エステルが、蔗糖脂肪
酸エステル、プロピレングライコールモノ脂肪酸
エステル、グリセリンモノ脂肪酸エステルおよび
ソルビタンモノ脂肪酸エステルから選ばれる一種
以上である特許請求の範囲第1項記載の製造法。 3 脂肪酸エステルを、油または親油性の溶媒に
対し、10重量%以上溶解した溶液として豆乳に添
加することを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項お
よび第2項記載の製造法。 4 豆乳に添加する脂肪酸エステルとして、トリ
脂肪酸エステル成分が豆乳全量に対し0.04重量%
以上であるような蔗糖脂肪酸エステルを用いるこ
とを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記載の製造
法。
[Scope of Claims] 1. One or more fatty acid esters selected from sucrose fatty acid ester, propylene glycol fatty acid ester, glycerin fatty acid ester, and sorbitan fatty acid ester are added to soymilk obtained from soybeans for 1 minute after addition. 1. A method for producing beverage soymilk, which comprises homogenizing the soymilk within a temperature of 70°C or more, and subjecting the soymilk to heat treatment at 70°C or higher during or after the homogenization. 2. The production method according to claim 1, wherein the fatty acid ester added to soymilk is one or more selected from sucrose fatty acid ester, propylene glycol monofatty acid ester, glycerin monofatty acid ester, and sorbitan monofatty acid ester. 3. The production method according to claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the fatty acid ester is added to soymilk as a solution in which 10% by weight or more of the fatty acid ester is dissolved in oil or a lipophilic solvent. 4 As a fatty acid ester added to soymilk, the trifatty acid ester component is 0.04% by weight based on the total amount of soymilk.
2. The manufacturing method according to claim 1, wherein the sucrose fatty acid ester as described above is used.
JP56073700A 1981-05-16 1981-05-16 Preparation of soya milk for drinking Granted JPS57189657A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP56073700A JPS57189657A (en) 1981-05-16 1981-05-16 Preparation of soya milk for drinking

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP56073700A JPS57189657A (en) 1981-05-16 1981-05-16 Preparation of soya milk for drinking

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS57189657A JPS57189657A (en) 1982-11-22
JPH028688B2 true JPH028688B2 (en) 1990-02-26

Family

ID=13525747

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP56073700A Granted JPS57189657A (en) 1981-05-16 1981-05-16 Preparation of soya milk for drinking

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS57189657A (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3414270B2 (en) * 1998-08-12 2003-06-09 不二製油株式会社 Soy milk production method
JP3486387B2 (en) * 2000-03-03 2004-01-13 社団法人県央研究所 Manufacturing method of tofu
JPWO2007125653A1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2009-09-10 興和株式会社 Herbal medicine-containing oral solution composition
JPWO2007135774A1 (en) * 2006-05-23 2009-10-01 興和株式会社 Herbal medicine-containing oral solution composition
JP2008289371A (en) * 2007-05-22 2008-12-04 Dai Ichi Kogyo Seiyaku Co Ltd Emulsifier for soy milk beverage and soy milk beverage containing the same
WO2012081971A1 (en) 2010-12-17 2012-06-21 N.V. Nutricia Whey protein composition with a reduced astringency
WO2015072570A1 (en) * 2013-11-15 2015-05-21 日清オイリオグループ株式会社 Improved soy milk and method for producing same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS57189657A (en) 1982-11-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3901978A (en) Soybean beverage and process
KR20070048972A (en) High-fiber germinated soybean food and preparation method thereof
CN101248856A (en) Process for preparing bittern tender bean curd
WO1998004154A1 (en) Processes for the production of dha-containing tofu and drinking soybean milk, and dry powders of them
KR20120104194A (en) Method for producing soy milk and method for producing tofu
JPS6324868A (en) Production of dense soybean milk
JPH028688B2 (en)
KR100858026B1 (en) Whole tofu manufacturing apparatus, manufacturing method and tofu produced by
CN101248854A (en) Preparing method of squeezing silk bean curd
JP2014187972A (en) Defoaming agent for soybean milk and soybean curd
CN115349603A (en) Making method of ancient-method-flavor soybean milk
JP6958606B2 (en) How to make soymilk for forming and soymilk for forming
CN101248855A (en) Method for preparing kapok bean curd
JP4680216B2 (en) Process for producing antifoam composition
CN111903772B (en) Bean curd and preparation process thereof
JPH0125553B2 (en)
JP3013494B2 (en) Liquid food defoamer and method of using the same
JPH08131112A (en) Whole grain soybean curd and its production
JP2008199922A (en) Deep-fried quality improver
JP2017200458A (en) Taste improver for soybean milk and bean curd
KR20070019265A (en) High Fiber Soybean Food Containing Soy Skin and Soybean Ingredients and Method of Making the Same
JPS6050426B2 (en) Manufacturing method for soybean dessert food
JPS6132941B2 (en)
KR102863438B1 (en) Coagulating agent for bean curd and Bean curd prepared by using the same
CN108925644A (en) It is a kind of now to grind konjaku soya-bean milk and preparation method thereof