JPH03219335A - Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenance - Google Patents
Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenanceInfo
- Publication number
- JPH03219335A JPH03219335A JP2015279A JP1527990A JPH03219335A JP H03219335 A JPH03219335 A JP H03219335A JP 2015279 A JP2015279 A JP 2015279A JP 1527990 A JP1527990 A JP 1527990A JP H03219335 A JPH03219335 A JP H03219335A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- failure
- maintenance
- information
- recording
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
[産業上の利用分野コ
この発明は、計算機システム等の遠隔保守用自動発信装
置に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] This invention relates to an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance of computer systems, etc.
[従来の技術]
第2図は、従来技術及び本発明を説明するために必要と
なる遠隔保守用自動発信装置のシステム構成を示すブロ
ック図である。図において、1は保守対象となるユーザ
計算機システム、2はユーザ計算機システム1の故障情
報等を保存し、その解析により得られる故障要因を保守
用情報として通信回線制御回路6から通信制御装置9を
介して保守用計算機システム10に発信する遠隔保守用
自動発信装置であり、当該装置2の主な処理及び制御を
行うマイクロプロセッサ3と、コンソール制御回路4.
コンソール59通信回線制御回路6、ディスク制御回路
7及び故障情報等が格納されるディスク装置8等から構
成されている。[Prior Art] FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the system configuration of an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance, which is necessary for explaining the prior art and the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 1 indicates a user computer system to be maintained, and reference numeral 2 stores failure information, etc. of the user computer system 1, and uses the failure factors obtained through analysis as maintenance information to control communication from a communication line control circuit 6 to a communication control device 9. This is an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance that sends a message to the maintenance computer system 10 via a microprocessor 3 that performs the main processing and control of the device 2, and a console control circuit 4.
The console 59 is composed of a communication line control circuit 6, a disk control circuit 7, and a disk device 8 in which failure information and the like are stored.
第3図は従来の遠隔保守用自動発信装置の動作を表した
処理フローであり、31は故障発生時の計算機の故障情
報採取処理であり、この処理によりディスク装M、 8
−hの故障情報ファイル8aに故障情報が格納される。FIG. 3 is a processing flow showing the operation of a conventional automatic transmission device for remote maintenance. 31 is a process for collecting computer failure information when a failure occurs, and this process causes the disk drive M, 8
Failure information is stored in the failure information file 8a of -h.
32は上記故障情報の解析処理であり、解析結果として
上記故障に関する要因情報を得る。これが保守用計募機
システム10に発信される保守用情報となる。33は故
障要因情報の発信を行う故障要因発信処理である。なお
、上記各処理31〜33は遠隔保守用自動発信装置2の
マイクロプロセッサ3により実行される。32 is an analysis process of the failure information, and factor information regarding the failure is obtained as an analysis result. This becomes the maintenance information transmitted to the maintenance recruitment machine system 10. 33 is a failure cause transmission process for transmitting failure cause information. Note that each of the above-mentioned processes 31 to 33 is executed by the microprocessor 3 of the automatic transmission device 2 for remote maintenance.
以上の構成において、従来は、第3図の故障情報採取処
理31により、ユーザ計算機システム1における故障発
生時の故障情報が故障情報ファイル8aに格納され、こ
の故障情報から故障情報解析処理32によって故障要因
の解析が行われる。In the above configuration, conventionally, failure information at the time of failure occurrence in the user computer system 1 is stored in the failure information file 8a by the failure information collection process 31 shown in FIG. An analysis of the factors is performed.
次に、上記故障情報解析処理32によって抽出された故
障要因が、故障要因発信処理33により遠隔地にある保
守用計算機システム10に公衆回線又は専用回線等を経
由して発信、転送される。Next, the failure cause extracted by the failure information analysis process 32 is transmitted and transferred to the maintenance computer system 10 in a remote location via a public line or a private line by a failure cause transmission process 33.
[発明が解決しようとする課題]
従来の遠隔保守用自動発信装置は、以上のように故障の
発生間隔に依存せず故障要因の発信を行っているので、
計算機ハードウェアの固定故障による同一故障多重発生
が起きた場合、同じ故障に対して何度でも発イ6を行っ
てしまい、回線コストの増大及び保守用情報管理の複雑
化による保守作業の増大などの問題点があった。また、
発信を人手で解除した場合、故障要因を取り除いた後に
発信許可状態に再設定するのを忘れると、次回故障発生
から発信は行われず、重大故障のMTTR(平均修理時
間)が著しく増大する場合がある。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] As described above, the conventional automatic transmission device for remote maintenance transmits the cause of the failure without depending on the interval between occurrences of the failure.
If the same failure occurs multiple times due to a fixed failure in computer hardware, the same failure will be triggered over and over again, increasing line costs and increasing maintenance work due to the complexity of maintenance information management. There was a problem. Also,
If you cancel the call manually and forget to reset it to the call permission state after removing the cause of the failure, the next time the failure occurs, the call will not be made and the MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) of a serious failure may increase significantly. be.
なお、故障要因発信処理において、同一故障要因の発生
回数により故障要因の発信を制御する方式がとられてい
る場合もあるが、上記多重故障が頻出する場合は短期間
に同一故障要因を発信する可能性があった。In addition, in the failure cause transmission process, there are cases where a method is used to control the transmission of failure causes based on the number of times the same failure cause occurs, but if the above multiple failures occur frequently, the same failure cause is transmitted in a short period of time. It was possible.
この発明は上記のような問題点を解消するためになされ
たもので、ハードウェア固定故障等による同一故障の多
重発生が起きた場合でも、同一故障の多重発信を人手に
依らず防止することができる遠隔保守用自動発信装置を
得ることを目的とする。This invention was made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and even if the same fault occurs multiple times due to fixed hardware faults, it is possible to prevent multiple transmissions of the same fault without relying on human intervention. The purpose of the present invention is to obtain an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance.
[課題を解決するための手段]
この発明に係る遠隔保守用自動発信装置は、保守対象装
置で発生した故障に関する保守用情報及びその発生時刻
を記録手段に記録する記録処理手段と、今回発生した故
障に関する保守用情報及び発生時刻と既に上記記録手段
に記録されている保守用情報及び発生時刻とを比較判定
し、規定時間内の同一保守用情報の発信を防止する発信
判定手段とを備えたものである。[Means for Solving the Problems] An automatic transmission device for remote maintenance according to the present invention includes a recording processing means for recording maintenance information and the time of occurrence of a failure that has occurred in a device to be maintained in a recording means, and and transmission determination means for comparing and determining the maintenance information and occurrence time regarding the failure with the maintenance information and occurrence time already recorded in the recording means, and preventing transmission of the same maintenance information within a specified time. It is something.
[作用コ
この発明による記録処理手段は、保守対象装置で発生し
た故障に関する保守用情報及びその発生時刻を記録手段
に記録し、発信判定手段で、今回発生した故障に関する
保守用情報及び発生時刻と厩に上記記録手段に記録され
ている保守用情報及び発生時刻とを比較判定し、同一の
故障が規定時間内に発生していない場合のみ今回の保守
用情報を発信させるようにして、規定時間内の同一故障
による保守用情報の多重発信を防止する。[Function] The recording processing means according to the present invention records maintenance information and the time of occurrence of a failure that has occurred in the equipment to be maintained in the recording means, and the transmission determination means records the maintenance information and the time of occurrence of the failure that has occurred this time. The stable compares the maintenance information recorded in the recording means with the time of occurrence and transmits the current maintenance information only if the same failure has not occurred within the specified time. This prevents multiple transmission of maintenance information due to the same failure within the system.
[実施例コ 以下、この発明の一実施例を図について説明する。[Example code] An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
この発明の一実施例による遠隔保守用自動発信装置のシ
ステム構成は前記第2図に示したものと同様であるが、
マイクロプロセッサ3により新たに本願による記録処理
手段と発信判定手段が実現され、また、ディスク装置8
上に新たに本願の記録手段に相当する故障要因記録ファ
イルが設けられる点が異なる。The system configuration of the automatic transmission device for remote maintenance according to an embodiment of the present invention is the same as that shown in FIG.
The microprocessor 3 newly realizes the recording processing means and the transmission determination means according to the present invention, and also the disk device 8
The difference is that a failure cause recording file corresponding to the recording means of the present application is newly provided above.
第1図は実施例による遠隔保守用自動発信装置の動作を
表した処理フローであり、図において、11は故障発生
時の計算機システムの故障情報採取処理であり、この処
理によりディスク装置8上の故障情報ファイル8aに故
障情報が格納される。12は上記故障情報の解析処理で
あり、解析結果として上記故障に関する要因情報を得る
。これが保守用計算機システム10に発信される保守用
情報となる。13は上記故障要因情報及び故障発生時刻
を本願の記録手段としてティスフ装M8上に設けられた
故障要因記録ファイル8bに格納する故障要因記録処理
、14は自動発信条件を限定して故障要因を発信するか
否かを判定する故障要因発信判定処理、15はこの判定
に基づき故障要因を発信する故障要因発信処理である。FIG. 1 is a processing flow showing the operation of the automatic transmission device for remote maintenance according to the embodiment. Failure information is stored in the failure information file 8a. 12 is an analysis process for the failure information, and factor information regarding the failure is obtained as an analysis result. This becomes the maintenance information sent to the maintenance computer system 10. 13 is a failure cause recording process for storing the above-mentioned failure cause information and failure occurrence time in the failure cause recording file 8b provided on the Tisfu device M8 as a recording means of the present application; 14 is a failure cause transmission with limited automatic transmission conditions; 15 is a failure cause transmission determination process that determines whether or not to cause a failure, and 15 is a failure cause transmission process that transmits a failure cause based on this determination.
上記故障要因発信判定処理14では、前記故障要因記録
ファイル8bに記録された最新の故障要因とそれ以前に
記録された故障要因とを比較して同一故障要因が有るか
否かを判定しくステップ14a)、なければ故障要因発
信処理15に移り、有れば計算機システム毎に定めた規
定時間内の同一故障であるか否かを判定しくステップ1
4b)、規定時間内でなければ故障要因発信処理15に
移り、規定時間内であれば故障要因発信処理15を行わ
ずに終了する。なお、上記故障要因記録処理13と故障
要因発信判定処理14はそれぞれ本願により備えられた
記録処理手段と発信判定手段により実行されるもので、
これらの手段はマイクロプロセッサ3により実現される
。すなわち、マイクロプロセッサ3に新たに組み込まれ
たマイクロプログラムにより実現される。In the failure cause transmission determination process 14, the latest failure cause recorded in the failure cause record file 8b is compared with the failure cause recorded before, and it is determined whether or not the same failure cause exists.Step 14a ), if not, the process moves to failure cause transmission processing 15, and if it is, it is determined whether or not it is the same failure within a specified time determined for each computer system.Step 1
4b) If it is not within the specified time, the process moves to the failure cause transmission process 15, and if it is within the specified time, the process ends without performing the failure cause transmission process 15. Note that the failure cause recording process 13 and the failure cause transmission determination process 14 are executed by the recording processing means and the transmission determination means provided in the present application, respectively.
These means are realized by the microprocessor 3. That is, it is realized by a microprogram newly incorporated into the microprocessor 3.
次に動作にて説明する。Next, the operation will be explained.
第1図において、従来同様、故障情報採取処理11によ
って故障情報ファイル8aに故障情報が格納され、故障
情報解析処理13によって一ヒ記故障情報から故障要因
を得る。次に、故障要因記録処理13によって上記故障
要因及び故障発生時刻が故障要因記録ファイル8bに記
録され、上記故障要因は故障要因記録ファイル8b中の
前回故障要因と故障要因発信判定処理14によって順次
比較され、同一故障の場合、前回故障発生時刻と上記今
回故障発生時刻との差(発生時間間隔)が規定値以上な
らば故障要因発信処理15によって発信され、規定値内
ならば発信を行わずに終了する。また、同一故障でなけ
れば、そのまま故障要因発信処理15によって発信され
る。In FIG. 1, as in the conventional case, failure information is stored in a failure information file 8a by a failure information collection process 11, and failure causes are obtained from the failure information by a failure information analysis process 13. Next, the failure cause and failure occurrence time are recorded in the failure cause recording file 8b by the failure cause recording process 13, and the failure cause is sequentially compared with the previous failure cause in the failure cause recording file 8b by the failure cause transmission determination process 14. In the case of the same failure, if the difference (occurrence time interval) between the previous failure occurrence time and the above-mentioned current failure occurrence time is greater than or equal to a specified value, the failure cause transmission processing 15 will issue a message, and if it is within the specified value, no message will be issued. finish. Furthermore, if the fault is not the same, the fault is sent as is by the fault cause sending process 15.
なお、上記実施例では、計算機故障要因の発信について
、記録処理手段と発信判定手段をマイクロプロセッサ3
に組み込まれるマイクロプログラムとして設けたが、上
記手段を特別なハードウェアを用いて実現しても同様な
効果を奏する。また、故障要因情報及び故障発生時刻を
記録する記録手段として、ディスク装置8−I−、に故
障要因記録ファイル8bを設けたか、従来からの故障情
報ファイル8aを拡張してそこに記録してもよく、また
、主記憶等の半導体メモリ上にそれ相当のものを設けて
も良い。In the above embodiment, the recording processing means and the transmission determination means are implemented by the microprocessor 3 for transmitting the cause of computer failure.
Although the above-described means is provided as a microprogram that is incorporated into the system, the same effect can be achieved even if the above-mentioned means is implemented using special hardware. Further, as a recording means for recording failure cause information and failure occurrence time, a failure cause recording file 8b may be provided in the disk device 8-I-, or the conventional failure information file 8a may be extended and recorded there. Alternatively, an equivalent device may be provided on a semiconductor memory such as a main memory.
また、上記実施例では、故障要因発信判定処理14にお
いて、まずステップ14aで同一故障要因が有るか否か
を判定し、次にステップ14bで同一故障の発生時間間
隔が規定値内か否かを判定しているが、逆にまず規定時
間内の故障要因を調べ、それらの中から同一故障要因が
有るか否かを判定するようにしても良く、また、前回の
故障要因のみを調べてもそれ相当の効果が得られる。Further, in the above embodiment, in the failure cause transmission determination process 14, it is first determined in step 14a whether or not there is the same failure cause, and then in step 14b it is determined whether or not the time interval between occurrences of the same failure is within a specified value. However, conversely, it is also possible to first check the failure causes within a specified time and then determine whether or not there is the same failure cause among them.Also, it is also possible to check only the previous failure cause. A corresponding effect can be obtained.
また、上記実施例では、計算機システムの故障情報から
故障要因を解析して、これを保守用情報として発信する
装置に本願を適用した例を示したが、本願はこれに限定
されず、例えば故障情報をそのまま保守用情報として発
信して保守側で解析するもの等9種々の形態のものに適
用でき、また、計算機システム以外にも遠隔保守のため
保守用情報を発信する種々の装置に適用可能である。Further, in the above embodiment, an example is shown in which the present application is applied to a device that analyzes failure causes from failure information of a computer system and transmits this as maintenance information, but the present application is not limited to this. It can be applied to 9 different types of systems, such as transmitting information directly as maintenance information and analyzing it on the maintenance side.In addition to computer systems, it can also be applied to various devices that transmit maintenance information for remote maintenance. It is.
[発明の効果]
以上のように、この発明によれば、保守対象装置で発生
した故障に関する保守用情報及びその発生時刻を記録手
段に記録する記録処理手段と、今回発生した故障に関す
る保守用情報及び発生時刻と既に上記記録手段に記録さ
れている保守用情報及び発生時刻とを比較判定し、規定
時間内の同一保守用情報の発信を防止する発信判定手段
とを備えたので、ハードウェア固定故障等による規定時
間内の同一多重発信を人手介入なしで防止することがで
き、回線コスI−の低減及び保守用情報管理の単純化に
よる保守作業の削減などが可能となる効果がある。[Effects of the Invention] As described above, according to the present invention, there is provided a recording processing means for recording maintenance information regarding a failure that has occurred in a device to be maintained and the time of occurrence thereof in a recording means, and maintenance information regarding a failure that has occurred this time. and a transmission determination means that compares and determines the occurrence time with the maintenance information already recorded in the recording means and the occurrence time, and prevents transmission of the same maintenance information within a specified time, so that the hardware cannot be fixed. It is possible to prevent the same multiple transmission within a specified time due to a failure or the like without manual intervention, and it is possible to reduce line cost I- and simplify maintenance information management, thereby reducing maintenance work.
第1図は本発明の一実施例による遠隔保守用自動発信装
置の処理フローを示すフローチャーI〜、第2図は従来
及び本発明の遠隔保守用自動発信装置のシステム構成例
を示すブロック図、第3図は従来の遠隔保守用自動発信
装置の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。
1はユーザ計算機システム(保守対象装置)、2は遠隔
保守用自動発信装置、3はマイクロプロセッサ(記録処
理手段9発信判定手段)、4はコンソール制御回路、5
はコンソール、6は通信回線制御回路、7はディスク制
御回路、8はディスク装置、8aは故障情報ファイル、
8bは故障要因記録ファイル(記録手段)、9は通信制
御装置、10は保守用計算機システム(保守用装fit
)、11は故障情報採取処理、12は故障情報解析処理
、13は故障要因記録処理、14は故障要因発信判定処
理、15は故障要因発信処理。FIG. 1 is a flowchart I~ showing the processing flow of an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the system configuration of an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance according to the conventional technology and the present invention. , FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the processing flow of a conventional automatic transmission device for remote maintenance. 1 is a user computer system (device to be maintained); 2 is an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance; 3 is a microprocessor (recording processing means 9; transmission determination means); 4 is a console control circuit; 5
is a console, 6 is a communication line control circuit, 7 is a disk control circuit, 8 is a disk device, 8a is a failure information file,
8b is a failure cause record file (recording means), 9 is a communication control device, 10 is a maintenance computer system (maintenance equipment
), 11 is a failure information collection process, 12 is a failure information analysis process, 13 is a failure cause recording process, 14 is a failure cause transmission determination process, and 15 is a failure cause transmission process.
Claims (1)
地にある保守用装置に発信する遠隔保守用自動発信装置
において、 保守対象装置で発生した故障に関する保守用情報及びそ
の発生時刻を記録手段に記録する記録処理手段と、今回
発生した故障に関する保守用情報及び発生時刻と既に上
記記録手段に記録されている保守用情報及び発生時刻と
を比較判定し、規定時間内の同一保守用情報の発信を防
止する発信判定手段とを備えたことを特徴とする遠隔保
守用自動発信装置。[Scope of Claims] In an automatic transmission device for remote maintenance that transmits maintenance information regarding a failure that has occurred in a device to be maintained to a maintenance device located in a remote location, maintenance information regarding a failure that has occurred in the device to be maintained and its occurrence. A recording processing means for recording the time in the recording means compares and determines the maintenance information and occurrence time regarding the current failure with the maintenance information and occurrence time already recorded in the recording means, and determines whether the same failure within a specified time is detected. 1. An automatic transmission device for remote maintenance, comprising: transmission determination means for preventing transmission of maintenance information.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015279A JPH03219335A (en) | 1990-01-25 | 1990-01-25 | Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenance |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015279A JPH03219335A (en) | 1990-01-25 | 1990-01-25 | Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenance |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH03219335A true JPH03219335A (en) | 1991-09-26 |
Family
ID=11884420
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015279A Pending JPH03219335A (en) | 1990-01-25 | 1990-01-25 | Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenance |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH03219335A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0895832A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1996-04-12 | Fujitsu Ltd | System abnormality monitoring device |
-
1990
- 1990-01-25 JP JP2015279A patent/JPH03219335A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0895832A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1996-04-12 | Fujitsu Ltd | System abnormality monitoring device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6434616B2 (en) | Method for monitoring abnormal behavior in a computer system | |
| RU2101224C1 (en) | System of remote control of lifts in separate buildings | |
| US6871293B2 (en) | Gap detector detecting gaps between transactions transmitted by clients and transactions processed by servers | |
| CN118555287B (en) | Method, device, equipment and medium for continuous transmission of database streaming backup breakpoint | |
| JPH03219335A (en) | Automatic signaling equipment for remote maintenance | |
| JPH05298215A (en) | Omitted data detecting/retransmitting method | |
| CN112134951A (en) | Data transmission method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| JPS59190763A (en) | Data transfer system | |
| KR100580103B1 (en) | Server process remote monitoring method of communication network management system | |
| JP2922450B2 (en) | How to collect LAN terminal information | |
| JPS59206936A (en) | Terminal controlling device with automatic transmitting mechanism of tracing data | |
| JPH1039920A (en) | Monitoring and notifying controller | |
| KR100784595B1 (en) | How to manage process status in mobile communication systems | |
| JPH07222267A (en) | State information collecting system and state managing system | |
| JPH06156906A (en) | Remote monitoring device for elevator | |
| WO2000055953A1 (en) | System and method of event management and early fault detection | |
| JP2618126B2 (en) | System audit monitoring method and apparatus | |
| JPS58225738A (en) | distributed transmission system | |
| JP2885192B2 (en) | Computer system and its state restoration method | |
| JPS5994199A (en) | Remote management system for building | |
| KR100439370B1 (en) | Method and System for managing interference of u-link condition in total access mode | |
| JPH04329098A (en) | Remote monitor | |
| JPH02216931A (en) | Fault information reporting system | |
| JPH09130414A (en) | Alarm management method in network | |
| JPH03244060A (en) | Decentralized processing system |