JPH03221855A - Method for evaluating high temperature damage of welding heat influenced part - Google Patents

Method for evaluating high temperature damage of welding heat influenced part

Info

Publication number
JPH03221855A
JPH03221855A JP2016563A JP1656390A JPH03221855A JP H03221855 A JPH03221855 A JP H03221855A JP 2016563 A JP2016563 A JP 2016563A JP 1656390 A JP1656390 A JP 1656390A JP H03221855 A JPH03221855 A JP H03221855A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
potential difference
temperature damage
signal
degree
damage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2016563A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2643000B2 (en
Inventor
Nobuhiko Nishimura
宣彦 西村
Fujimitsu Masuyama
不二光 増山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2016563A priority Critical patent/JP2643000B2/en
Publication of JPH03221855A publication Critical patent/JPH03221855A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2643000B2 publication Critical patent/JP2643000B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To evaluate the degree of high temperature damage by applying a potential difference ratio or the difference of potential differences between an input component and an AC compo nent having the same frequency and phase as that of the input component to a previously formed diagram indicating relation between the potential difference ratio or the difference of potential differences and the degree of high temperature damage. CONSTITUTION:An AC signal having the sine wave of an optional frequency band is generated from an AC oscillator 11 built in a lock-in amplifier 10 and amplified by a power amplifier 12 and the amplified signal is impressed from a current input terminal to a part between a base material part 1a and a welding part 2. Electric signals from potential difference measur ing terminals 5, 6 are respectively amplified by a power amplifier 15 respectively through a signal switching circuit 14 and detected 10 by using a signal from the oscillator 11 as a reference signal, signals other than the electric signal having the same frequency and phase as that of the oscillation signal are removed and the inter-terminal potential difference of only the electric signal having the same frequency and phase as that of the oscillation signal is measured. Then, the potential difference ratio or difference of potential difference between an welding heat influenced part 3 and the base material part 1a is applied to the damage evaluating diagram indicating the relation between the potential difference ratio or the differ ence of potential differences and the degree of high temperature damage, the degree of thigh temperature damage of the influenced part 3 can be evaluated.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、フェライト系耐熱鋼溶接部を有する高温機器
の使用中の保守管理に好適な、溶接熱影響部の高温損傷
評価方法に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a method for evaluating high-temperature damage in a weld heat-affected zone, which is suitable for maintenance management during use of high-temperature equipment having a ferritic heat-resistant steel weld.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来からフェライト系耐熱鋼の高温損傷評価方法として
は、機械部品として使用されている耐熱鋼の一部を切り
出してクリープ試験等の破壊試験を行う方法が用いられ
ており、また非破壊的に評価する方法としては、高温損
傷の結果生ずるき裂を磁粉探傷法2超音波深傷法等の欠
陥検査法によって検査する方法や、き裂が発生す為以前
の微小欠陥1組織変化をレプリカ法等によって観察して
高温損傷の程度を評価する方法が用いられている。
Traditionally, the high-temperature damage evaluation method for ferritic heat-resistant steel has been to cut out a part of the heat-resistant steel used as mechanical parts and conduct a destructive test such as a creep test. Methods to do this include inspecting cracks that occur as a result of high-temperature damage using defect inspection methods such as magnetic particle flaw detection and ultrasonic deep flaw detection, and replica methods that examine micro-defects that occurred before cracks have occurred. The method used is to observe and evaluate the degree of high temperature damage.

しかしながら、破壊試験に供する方法は、最も精度の高
い高温損傷評価方法として従来から多用されているが、
試験に供するために機械部品として使用されているフェ
ライト系耐熱鋼を切り取る必要があり、一般に大規模な
試験片採取、復旧工事が必要であるとともに、試験に時
間を要しており、非破壊的にかつ短時間で高温損傷で評
価する手法の確立が待たれている。
However, although the method of subjecting it to destructive testing has traditionally been widely used as the most accurate high-temperature damage evaluation method,
It is necessary to cut out the ferritic heat-resistant steel used as mechanical parts for testing, which generally requires large-scale specimen collection and restoration work, and the testing is time-consuming and non-destructive. Establishment of a method to evaluate high-temperature damage quickly and quickly is awaited.

また高′/IA損傷の蓄積によって生ずるき裂を非破壊
的に検出する方法は、簡便であるが、き裂をその構造物
の寿命末期にしか現われないことが多いために、計画的
な保守管理を行うためにはき裂発生以前の高温損傷のM
積を非破壊的に評価する手法の確立が待たれている。
Additionally, non-destructive methods for detecting cracks caused by the accumulation of high'/IA damage are simple, but since cracks often appear only at the end of a structure's lifespan, it is difficult to conduct planned maintenance. In order to manage the damage caused by high temperature before crack initiation,
The establishment of a method to non-destructively evaluate the product is awaited.

更にき裂が発生する以前の微小欠陥9組織変化をレプリ
カ法等によって観察しで高温損傷の程度を評価する方法
は、き裂が発生する以前の高温損傷を評価する方法とし
て実用化されているが、この方法では、機械部品の調査
対象位置を鏡面r!F磨及びエツチングしてレプリカを
採取し、その後このレプリカを顕微鏡、電子顕微鏡等の
分析機器に装着して調査する必要があり、非破壊的では
あるが調査対象位置の高温損傷の程度をその場で評価す
ることはてきす、調査及び評価に時間を要する不具合が
ある。
Furthermore, a method of evaluating the degree of high-temperature damage by observing micro-defect 9 structural changes before cracks occur using a replica method, etc. has been put into practical use as a method for evaluating high-temperature damage before cracks occur. However, with this method, the inspection target position of the mechanical part is mirror surface r! It is necessary to collect a replica by F-polishing and etching, and then attach this replica to analytical equipment such as a microscope or electron microscope for investigation.Although this is a non-destructive method, it is possible to assess the extent of high-temperature damage at the location to be investigated on the spot. However, it is difficult to evaluate by using the following methods, and there are problems that require time to investigate and evaluate.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problem to be solved by the invention]

本発明は、このような事情に鑑みて提案されたもので、
その場で簡便かつ適確にフェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接熱影
響部の高温損傷を評価できるとともに、その後の試験等
が全く不要であり、従ってフェライト系耐熱鋼からなる
高温機器の供用中検査に要する時間及び費用を大巾に低
減できるとともに、その後の?ili修、取替等の迅速
な対応が可能となり、ひいては高温機器の信頼性の向上
及び稼’JJJ費の軽減をもたらすことができる溶接熱
影響部の高温損傷評価方法を提供することを目的とする
The present invention was proposed in view of these circumstances, and
High-temperature damage in the welded heat-affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel can be easily and accurately evaluated on the spot, and subsequent tests are completely unnecessary. Not only can time and costs be drastically reduced, but also what can be done afterwards? The purpose of the present invention is to provide a high temperature damage evaluation method for weld heat affected zones that enables quick repairs, replacements, etc., and that ultimately improves the reliability of high temperature equipment and reduces operating costs. do.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

そのために本発明は、フェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接熱影響
部をまたく2点の端子に交流電流を流し、同2点間を結
ぶ線分上のl容接熱影響部をまたく2点間及び母材の2
点間の各電位差を測定し、その人力成分と同し周波数及
び位相の交流成分の電位差比又は電位差の差を予め作成
した電位差比又は電位差の差と高温損傷度との関係を示
す損傷評価線図にあてはめることによって、溶接熱影響
部の高温損傷の程度を評価することを特徴とする。
To this end, the present invention provides a method for passing an alternating current through terminals at two points that straddle the weld heat affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel, and to and base material 2
A damage evaluation line that shows the relationship between a potential difference ratio or a potential difference created in advance by measuring each potential difference between points and the potential difference ratio or potential difference of an alternating current component with the same frequency and phase as the human component and the degree of high temperature damage. The feature is that the degree of high temperature damage in the weld heat affected zone is evaluated by applying it to the diagram.

〔作用〕[Effect]

本発明方法においては、フェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接熱影
響部の高温損傷の程度を、調査対象位置の外表面に電流
入力用2端子、電位差出力用4端子の6本の端子を配置
接続するだけで評価することができ、従ってサンプル採
取及び補修工事が必要な破壊試験法や、調査対象位置の
研磨、エツチング及びレプリカ採取が必要な非破壊検査
法に比較して調査が簡便であるとともに、サンプル採取
後の長時間にわたる破壊試験や組織調査試験を必要とせ
ず、その場で寿命評価を行うことができる。
In the method of the present invention, the degree of high-temperature damage in the weld heat-affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel can be determined by simply arranging and connecting six terminals, two terminals for current input and four terminals for potential difference output, on the outer surface of the target position. Therefore, compared to destructive testing methods that require sample collection and repair work, and non-destructive testing methods that require polishing, etching, and replica collection of the survey target location, the investigation is simpler and easier to conduct than samples. Lifespan evaluation can be performed on the spot without the need for long-term destructive tests or tissue investigation tests after collection.

またノイズ電流の除去が不可能な直流法に代わって交流
法によって測定し、ノイズ電流による測定の誤差を生ず
ることなく、高精度の寿命評価が可能である。
Furthermore, measurement is performed using an alternating current method instead of a direct current method in which noise current cannot be removed, and highly accurate life evaluation is possible without measurement errors caused by noise current.

更に顕著な高温損傷の蓄積が認められる溶接熱影響部の
電気抵抗値の絶対値ではなく、高温損傷のN積が軽微な
母材の電気抵抗値との比又は差によって高温損傷を評価
し、温度等による測定値のばらつきの影響を取り除くこ
とができ、高精度の寿命評価を行・うことかできる。
Furthermore, high-temperature damage is evaluated not by the absolute value of the electrical resistance value of the weld heat-affected zone, where significant accumulation of high-temperature damage is observed, but by the ratio or difference between the N product of high-temperature damage and the electrical resistance value of the base material, where the N product is slight. It is possible to eliminate the influence of variations in measured values due to temperature, etc., making it possible to perform highly accurate life evaluations.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

本発明溶接熱影響部の高温損傷評価方法をフェライI・
系耐熱鋼管の溶接部に遠州した一実施例を図面について
説明すると、第1図は測定端子を配置したフェライト系
耐熱鋼管の正面図、第2図は第1図の■[部分の詳細断
面図、第3図は電位差測定回路の系統図、第4図は具体
的実験例の説明図である。
The method for evaluating high-temperature damage of a weld heat-affected zone according to the present invention is
To explain one embodiment of the welded part of a heat-resistant ferritic steel pipe using drawings, Fig. 1 is a front view of a heat-resistant ferritic steel pipe with measurement terminals arranged, and Fig. 2 is a detailed cross-sectional view of the part shown in Fig. 1. , FIG. 3 is a system diagram of the potential difference measuring circuit, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a specific experimental example.

まず実施例を説明するに先立ち、本発明方法の成立過程
及び原理を説明する。
First, before explaining the embodiments, the process and principle of the method of the present invention will be explained.

本発明方法は、従来のレプリカ法よりも簡便にき裂発生
以前の高温損傷を評価する方法について検討し、電位差
法に着目したものである。電位差法は表面き裂の深さを
非破壊的に検出する方法として既に実用化されており、
この方法は、き裂をまたく2点間に一定電流を流して、
同2点を結ぶ線分上のき裂をまたく2点間の電位差を測
定し、き裂が深くなればなる程き裂を含む2点間の電位
差が大きくなることを利用して、予め既知の深さのき裂
により測定した電位差とき裂深さとの関係を示すき裂深
さ評価基準線図を用いて評価するが、この場合、き製部
をまたぐ2点間の電位差の絶対値を用いるため、端子の
接触状態。
The method of the present invention focuses on the potential difference method by examining a method for evaluating high-temperature damage before crack initiation that is easier than the conventional replica method. The potentiometric method has already been put into practical use as a method to non-destructively detect the depth of surface cracks.
This method involves passing a constant current between two points across the crack,
Measure the potential difference between two points across the crack on the line segment connecting the same two points, and take advantage of the fact that the deeper the crack, the greater the potential difference between the two points including the crack. Evaluation is performed using a crack depth evaluation reference diagram that shows the relationship between the potential difference measured with a crack of known depth and the crack depth. In this case, the absolute value of the potential difference between two points across the forged part is evaluated. Terminal contact condition.

測定位置の温度等の影響を受けることからき裂発生以前
の微小空孔、粗大析出物等による電位差変化を有効に検
出することはできない。
It is not possible to effectively detect potential difference changes due to micropores, coarse precipitates, etc. before crack initiation because they are affected by the temperature of the measurement position.

そこで本発明方性においては、フェライト系耐熱鋼にお
けるクリープ損傷は、そのほとんどが溶接熱影響部に位
置することに着目して、電流入力を溶接熱影響部をまた
く2点間に流し、この2点間を結ぶ線分上の溶接熱影響
部をまたく2点間すなわち損傷部の電位差を測定すると
ともに、同線分上の母材部すなわち非損傷部の電位差を
同時に測定し、両電位差の比又は両電位差の差を測定す
る。
Therefore, in the present invention, focusing on the fact that most of the creep damage in ferritic heat-resistant steel is located in the weld heat-affected zone, current input is applied between two points that straddle the weld heat-affected zone. Measure the potential difference between two points that straddle the weld heat affected zone on the line connecting the two points, that is, the damaged area, and simultaneously measure the potential difference of the base material, that is, the undamaged area on the same line, and calculate the potential difference between the two points. Measure the ratio of or the difference between the two potentials.

また実際の構造部品での電位差側定時には、多くのノイ
ズ電流が流れておりノイスを除去しないままではき裂発
生以前の損傷による電位の微弱な変化を検出することは
困難である。
Furthermore, when the potential difference side of an actual structural component is constant, a large amount of noise current flows, and without removing the noise, it is difficult to detect a slight change in potential due to damage before a crack occurs.

そこで本発明方法においては、印加電流を交流正弦波電
流とするとともに、電位差検出用の端子間の電流波形を
入力電流の交流正佐波と同期させて検波を行い、入力波
形以外の電流成分ずなわちノイズ電流成分を除去した波
形の電流のみの電位差を測定する。
Therefore, in the method of the present invention, the applied current is an AC sinusoidal current, and the current waveform between the terminals for potential difference detection is detected in synchronization with the AC waveform of the input current, and current components other than the input waveform are detected. In other words, the potential difference of only the current waveform with the noise current component removed is measured.

このような原理に基づく本発明方法により、高温機器の
部品として供用されているフエライI・系耐熱鋼管溶接
部における高温損傷評価を行う態様を以下に説明する。
The method of the present invention based on such a principle will be described below to evaluate high-temperature damage in welded parts of Ferai I series heat-resistant steel pipes that are used as parts of high-temperature equipment.

まず第1図において、フェライト系耐熱鋼管1の母材部
1a、熔接部2及び溶接熱影響部3における測定端子の
配置要領は、1対の電流入力端子4,4を、溶接熱影響
部3をまたく母+A部]aと溶接部2とに配置し、また
損傷部である溶接熱影響部3を測定する1対の電位差測
定端子5,5を、上記端子4.4を結ぶ線分上の溶接部
2と溶接熱影響部3とに配置し、更に非損傷部である母
材91t 1 aを測定する1対の電位差測定端子6,
6を、同じく上記端子4,4を結ぶ線分上の母材部la
に配置する。
First, in FIG. 1, the arrangement of measurement terminals in the base metal part 1a, the welded part 2, and the welded heat affected zone 3 of the ferritic heat-resistant steel pipe 1 is as follows. A pair of potential difference measurement terminals 5, 5, which are placed at the weld zone 2 and which measures the weld heat affected zone 3, which is the damaged area, are connected to the line segment connecting the terminals 4.4. A pair of potential difference measuring terminals 6 arranged in the upper welding part 2 and the welding heat affected zone 3 and further measuring the base material 91t 1 a which is an undamaged part,
6 is also the base material part la on the line segment connecting the terminals 4, 4.
Place it in

しかしてこれら各端子4,5.6は、第2図に示すよう
に、各配置部材に明けられた直径1.9mm、深さ0.
5mmの取付穴7内に0.5田の白金線8をスポラ1〜
熔接付けし、周囲に酸化防止のためのセラく・7クス系
絶縁接着材9を充填して形成されている。
As shown in FIG. 2, each of these terminals 4, 5.6 has a diameter of 1.9 mm and a depth of 0.9 mm, which are provided in each arrangement member.
Insert the platinum wire 8 of 0.5 mm into the 5 mm mounting hole 7 from Spora 1 to
It is formed by welding and filling the periphery with a ceramic-based insulating adhesive 9 to prevent oxidation.

そこでこの2端子4.4から交流電流を印加し、他の4
端子5.5及び6.6を用いて各対端子配置2点間の電
位差を測定するにあたっては、第3図において、ロック
インアンプ10内に内蔵された交流発振器11から任意
の周波数の正弦波の交流信号を発生させ、電力増11」
器12によって増rp l、、電流人力αR1i子4,
4から第1図の母材部la、溶接部2間に印加する。こ
のとき定電流化を図るため、」二記印加対象部よりも十
分大きい基準抵抗13が入力回路に接続されている。
Therefore, an alternating current is applied from these two terminals 4.4, and the other 4
When measuring the potential difference between two points in each pair terminal arrangement using terminals 5.5 and 6.6, in FIG. Generates an alternating current signal, increasing power 11"
Increased by the device 12 rp l,, current human power αR1i child 4,
4 to the base metal part la and the welding part 2 in FIG. At this time, in order to maintain a constant current, a reference resistor 13 that is sufficiently larger than the application target section described in "2" is connected to the input circuit.

しかして電位差測定端子5,5及び電位差測定端子6.
6からの電気信号は、それぞれ信号切替回路14を介し
て別々に電力増中器15によって増巾され、ロックイン
アンプ10内で交流発振器11からの信号を参照信号と
して検波され、発振信号と同じ周波数及び位相の電気信
号以外は除去されて、発振信号と同−周波数及び同位相
の信号のみの端子間電位差が測定される。
Thus, the potential difference measuring terminals 5, 5 and the potential difference measuring terminal 6.
The electrical signals from AC oscillator 11 are amplified by power multipliers 15 through signal switching circuits 14, respectively, and detected in lock-in amplifier 10 using the signal from AC oscillator 11 as a reference signal, which is the same as the oscillation signal. Electric signals other than those having the same frequency and phase are removed, and the potential difference between the terminals of only signals having the same frequency and phase as the oscillation signal is measured.

次いでこの測定により得られた溶接熱影響部3の電位差
と母材部1aの電位差の電位差比又は電位差の差を、予
め作成した電位差比又は電位差の差と高温損傷度との関
係を示す損傷評価線図にあてはめると、溶接熱影響部3
の高温損傷の程度が判明する。
Next, the potential difference ratio or the potential difference between the potential difference of the welding heat affected zone 3 and the potential difference of the base metal part 1a obtained by this measurement is used as a damage evaluation that shows the relationship between the potential difference ratio or the potential difference and the degree of high-temperature damage created in advance. When applied to the diagram, welding heat affected zone 3
The extent of high-temperature damage is revealed.

0 次に第4図について具体的実験例を説明する。0 Next, a specific experimental example will be explained with reference to FIG.

同図鎖線内に示すような、2%Cr−IM。2% Cr-IM as shown within the chain line in the figure.

鋼溶接継手で溶接熱影響部3bに切欠き3b′を設けた
切欠きクリープ破断試験片1bを、600℃X 8kg
f 7m2. 55 Q℃X 5 kg f/關2の条
件下でクリープ破断試験を行い、破断までの種々の時間
で試験を中断した試験片の電位差測定を行った。
A notched creep rupture test piece 1b with a notch 3b' formed in the weld heat affected zone 3b of a steel welded joint was tested at 600°C x 8kg.
f 7m2. A creep rupture test was conducted under the conditions of 55 Q° C.

その結果を示すと同図線図の通りである。The results are shown in the diagram in the same figure.

図中横軸は第(1)式に示すクリープ破断寿命消費率で
あり、縦軸は第(2)式に示す初期値で規格化した母材
部に対する溶接熱影響部の電位差比である。
In the figure, the horizontal axis is the creep rupture life consumption rate shown in equation (1), and the vertical axis is the potential difference ratio of the weld heat affected zone to the base metal normalized by the initial value shown in equation (2).

中断時間 クリープ破断寿命消費率− 破断時間 ・・・(1) 初期値で規格化した電位差比 試験中の溶接熱影響部の電位差 試験中の母材部の電位差 試験前の母材部の電位差 ・・・(2) 第4図に示したように、規格化した母材部に対する溶接
熱影響部の電位差比は、クリープ破断寿命消費率30%
程度からクリープ破断寿命消費率に対して単調土曽加し
ており、寿命中期から寿命末期までの寿命消費率を本発
明方法によって簡便にかつ精度良く評価できることが判
る。
Interruption time creep rupture life consumption rate - rupture time...(1) Potential difference of base metal part during potential difference test of weld heat affected zone during potential difference ratio test normalized to initial value. Potential difference of base metal part before test. ...(2) As shown in Figure 4, the potential difference ratio of the weld heat-affected zone to the normalized base metal is 30% of the creep rupture life consumption rate.
It can be seen that the earth is monotonically added to the creep rupture life consumption rate, and that the life consumption rate from the middle of life to the end of life can be easily and accurately evaluated by the method of the present invention.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

要するに本発明によれば、フェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接熱
影響部をまたぐ2点の端子に交流電流を流し、同2点間
を結ぶ線分上の溶接熱影響部をまたぐ2点間及び母材の
2点間の各電位差を測定し、その入力成分と同し周波数
及び位相の交流成分の電位差比又は電位差4゜ の差を予め作成した電位差比又は電位差の差と高温損傷
度との関係を示す損傷評価線図にあてはめることによっ
て、溶接熱影響部の高温損傷の程度を評価することによ
り、その場で簡便かつ適確にフェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接
熱影響部の高温損傷を評価できるとともに、その後の試
験等が全く不要であり、従ってフェライト系耐熱鋼から
なる高温機器の供用中検査に要する時間及び費用を大巾
に低減できるとともに、その後の補修、取替等の迅速な
対応が可能となり、ひいては高温機器の信頼性の向上及
び稼働費の軽減をもたらずことかできる溶接熱影響部の
高温損傷評価方法を得るから、本発明は産業上極めて有
益なものである。
In short, according to the present invention, alternating current is applied to terminals at two points that straddle the weld heat affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel, and between the two points that straddle the weld heat affected zone on the line segment connecting the two points and the base material. Measure each potential difference between two points, and calculate the potential difference ratio of the AC component with the same frequency and phase as the input component, or the potential difference of 4°, to determine the relationship between the potential difference ratio or potential difference difference and the degree of high temperature damage. By applying the damage evaluation diagram shown in the diagram to evaluate the degree of high-temperature damage in the weld heat-affected zone, it is possible to easily and accurately evaluate the high-temperature damage in the weld heat-affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel on the spot. There is no need for subsequent testing, and therefore, the time and cost required for in-service inspections of high-temperature equipment made of ferritic heat-resistant steel can be greatly reduced, and subsequent repairs and replacements can be carried out quickly. INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is extremely useful industrially because it provides a high-temperature damage evaluation method for a weld heat-affected zone that can improve the reliability of high-temperature equipment and reduce operating costs.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明溶接熱影響部の高温損傷評価方法をフェ
ライト系耐熱鋼管の溶接熱に適用した一実施例における
測定端子を配置したフェライI・系耐熱鋼管の正面図、
第2図は第3 1図の■部分の詳細断面図、第3図は電位差測定回路の
系統図、第4図は具体的実験例の説明図である。 1・・・フェライト系耐熱鋼管、1a・・・母材部、2
・・・溶接熱、3・・・溶接熱影響部、4・・・電流入
力端子、5・・・電位差測定端子、6・・・電位差測定
端子、7・・・取付穴、8・・・白金線、9・・・絶縁
接着材、lO・・・ロンフィンアンプ、11・・・交流
発振器、12・・・電力増中器、13・・・基準抵抗、
14・・・信号切替回路、15・・・電力上曽巾器。
FIG. 1 is a front view of a Ferri I heat-resistant steel pipe with measurement terminals arranged in an embodiment in which the high-temperature damage evaluation method of a weld heat-affected zone of the present invention is applied to welding heat of a ferritic heat-resistant steel pipe;
FIG. 2 is a detailed cross-sectional view of the part (■) in FIG. 31, FIG. 3 is a system diagram of the potential difference measuring circuit, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a specific experimental example. 1... Ferritic heat-resistant steel pipe, 1a... Base metal part, 2
... Welding heat, 3... Welding heat affected zone, 4... Current input terminal, 5... Potential difference measurement terminal, 6... Potential difference measurement terminal, 7... Mounting hole, 8... Platinum wire, 9... Insulating adhesive, lO... Ronfin amplifier, 11... AC oscillator, 12... Power multiplier, 13... Reference resistor,
14... Signal switching circuit, 15... Electric power converter.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] フェライト系耐熱鋼の溶接熱影響部をまたぐ2点の端子
に交流電流を流し、同2点間を結ぶ線分上の溶接熱影響
部をまたぐ2点間及び母材の2点間の各電位差を測定し
、その入力成分と同じ周波数及び位相の交流成分の電位
差比又は電位差の差を予め作成した電位差比又は電位差
の差と高温損傷度との関係を示す損傷評価線図にあては
めることによって、溶接熱影響部の高温損傷の程度を評
価することを特徴とする溶接熱影響部の高温損傷評価方
法。
An alternating current is passed through two terminals that straddle the weld heat affected zone of ferritic heat-resistant steel, and each potential difference between the two points that straddle the weld heat affected zone on the line segment connecting the two points and between two points of the base metal is calculated. By measuring the potential difference ratio or potential difference of an AC component with the same frequency and phase as the input component, and applying it to a damage evaluation diagram showing the relationship between the potential difference ratio or potential difference difference and the high temperature damage degree, created in advance, A method for evaluating high-temperature damage to a weld heat-affected zone, the method comprising evaluating the degree of high-temperature damage to the weld heat-affected zone.
JP2016563A 1990-01-26 1990-01-26 High-temperature damage evaluation method for weld heat affected zone Expired - Lifetime JP2643000B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016563A JP2643000B2 (en) 1990-01-26 1990-01-26 High-temperature damage evaluation method for weld heat affected zone

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016563A JP2643000B2 (en) 1990-01-26 1990-01-26 High-temperature damage evaluation method for weld heat affected zone

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH03221855A true JPH03221855A (en) 1991-09-30
JP2643000B2 JP2643000B2 (en) 1997-08-20

Family

ID=11919752

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016563A Expired - Lifetime JP2643000B2 (en) 1990-01-26 1990-01-26 High-temperature damage evaluation method for weld heat affected zone

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2643000B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012112837A (en) * 2010-11-25 2012-06-14 Jfe Steel Corp Method and device for inspecting crack of pipe weld zone
JP2014126376A (en) * 2012-12-25 2014-07-07 Ntn Corp Hardening quality inspection device and hardening quality inspection method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5841341A (en) * 1981-09-04 1983-03-10 Hitachi Ltd Detection of crack
JPS5869273U (en) * 1981-11-02 1983-05-11 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Inspection equipment using electrical resistance method
JPS63199058U (en) * 1987-06-13 1988-12-21

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5841341A (en) * 1981-09-04 1983-03-10 Hitachi Ltd Detection of crack
JPS5869273U (en) * 1981-11-02 1983-05-11 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Inspection equipment using electrical resistance method
JPS63199058U (en) * 1987-06-13 1988-12-21

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012112837A (en) * 2010-11-25 2012-06-14 Jfe Steel Corp Method and device for inspecting crack of pipe weld zone
JP2014126376A (en) * 2012-12-25 2014-07-07 Ntn Corp Hardening quality inspection device and hardening quality inspection method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2643000B2 (en) 1997-08-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN202092997U (en) Natural defect welding test piece
JPS63180851A (en) Creep damage determination method for ferromagnetic workpieces
Ling et al. Input electrical impedance as quality monitoring signature for characterizing resistance spot welding
CA2539086C (en) Method and apparatus for eddy current detection of material discontinuities
CN103776895B (en) Nondestructive examination method for evaluating contact damage of ferromagnetic material
KR102352319B1 (en) Quality Inspection Devices, Methods, Systems and Integral Probe Assemblies
JPH03221855A (en) Method for evaluating high temperature damage of welding heat influenced part
CN116027008B (en) Evaluation method of welding quality of pressure transmitter flange diaphragm based on failure physics
JP4756224B1 (en) Spot welding inspection equipment
CN114994182A (en) Welding quality detection method based on nonlinear ultrasound
Smith et al. Measuring fatigue cracks in fillet welded joints
JP2540630B2 (en) Method of evaluating remaining life of ferritic heat resistant steel
CN113740432A (en) Method for detecting connection quality in transient liquid phase connection
Dong et al. Characterizing stress concentration by metal magnetic memory signal of (x)
Ratkovac et al. Detection and monitoring of the fatigue crack growth on welds–Application-oriented use of NDT methods
CN120121807B (en) Aging Analysis Method for Boiler Dissimilar Steel Welded Joints
JP2006118902A (en) Defect height evaluation method by eddy current testing
JP7459835B2 (en) Evaluation method for steel pipe joints
TWI325496B (en)
JPH04208837A (en) Method for evaluating fatigue of machine parts
Li et al. Characterisation of backwall crack depth using the pulsed potential drop method
JPH05215706A (en) Non-destructive inspection method of welded part
JP5520061B2 (en) Internal defect evaluation method by eddy current method
Roskosz Capabilities and limitations of using the residual magnetic field in NDT
JPH0244019B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090502

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090502

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100502

Year of fee payment: 13

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100502

Year of fee payment: 13