JPH033608A - How to diagnose electrical wire abnormalities - Google Patents

How to diagnose electrical wire abnormalities

Info

Publication number
JPH033608A
JPH033608A JP1138319A JP13831989A JPH033608A JP H033608 A JPH033608 A JP H033608A JP 1138319 A JP1138319 A JP 1138319A JP 13831989 A JP13831989 A JP 13831989A JP H033608 A JPH033608 A JP H033608A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wire
defect
measured
coil
electric wire
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP1138319A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0734606B2 (en
Inventor
Junji Iinuma
飯沼 順二
Makoto Endo
誠 遠藤
Yasushi Iwaizumi
岩泉 泰
Junji Fukuda
福田 淳治
Yasuo Kojima
小島 泰雄
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fujikura Ltd
Tohoku Electric Power Co Inc
Original Assignee
Fujikura Ltd
Tohoku Electric Power Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fujikura Ltd, Tohoku Electric Power Co Inc filed Critical Fujikura Ltd
Priority to JP13831989A priority Critical patent/JPH0734606B2/en
Publication of JPH033608A publication Critical patent/JPH033608A/en
Publication of JPH0734606B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0734606B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Electric Cable Installation (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To detect whether there is any defect at an internal layer or at an external layer, by using two sorts of inspecting coils, and by crossing the while layer section and the external layer section of an electric wire with magnetic flux, to look for the defect. CONSTITUTION:An inspecting coil 1A is supported in a state wound on the longitudinally cracked cylinder of non-magnetic substance, and consists of coils separated from each other at longitudinally cracked sections and connected to each other electrically and mechanically with a connector at the longitudinally cracked sections, and magnetic flux phi is crossed with the whole layer of an electric wire W to be measured. An inspecting coil 1C is a coil wound on a circular-plate-shaped core bent along the peripheral direction of the electric wire W to be measured, and the electric wire W is crossed with the magnetic flux phi mainly near an external layer, along the longitudinal direction of the electric wire W to be measured. First, by using the coil 1A, any defect at the whole layer is looked for, and when any defect is detected, then the section of the defect is looked for by using the coil 1C, and it is discriminated whether the defect is an internal layer defect or an external layer defect.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 「産業上の利用分野J 本発明は、電線異常の診断方法に係り、特に、交番磁束
を電線導体部分に及ぼした場合の磁気特性を測定するこ
とにより、導体部分における腐食状態などの異常を高い
精度で診断するものである。
Detailed Description of the Invention "Industrial Application Field J The present invention relates to a method for diagnosing abnormalities in electric wires, and in particular, by measuring the magnetic characteristics when alternating magnetic flux is applied to the conductor portion of the wire, This system diagnoses abnormalities such as corrosion conditions with high accuracy.

「従来技術」 鋼心アルミ撚線等の電線は、これが海岸近くに架線され
ているなどの環境下にある場合には、その腐食の恐れが
大となる問題が生じる。
``Prior Art'' When electric wires such as steel-core aluminum stranded wires are placed in an environment such as an overhead wire near the coast, a problem arises in that there is a high risk of corrosion.

このような電線の腐食状況を非破壊によって検査する方
法として、第5図(B )(C)(D )に示すような
電線検査用コイルIB−1c・!Dを被測定電線Wに装
着して通電することにより、交番磁束を被測定電線Wの
導体部分と強磁性体部分とに交差させ、磁気特性の変化
によって腐食などの異常現象が生じているかどうかを判
別する計画がなされている。
As a method for non-destructively inspecting the corrosion status of electric wires, electric wire inspection coil IB-1c.! shown in FIGS. 5(B), (C), and (D) is used. By attaching D to the wire W to be measured and energizing it, alternating magnetic flux crosses the conductor portion and ferromagnetic portion of the wire W to be measured, and whether abnormal phenomena such as corrosion occur due to changes in magnetic properties. Plans are being made to determine the

第5図(B)の電線検査用コイルIBは、プローブコイ
ル、型と呼称されており、線輪が被測定電線Wの表面に
沿って巻回されているために、破線で示すように、発生
させた磁束φを主として被測定電線Wの半径方向に交差
させるものとなる。
The electric wire inspection coil IB in FIG. 5(B) is called a probe coil or type, and since the coil is wound along the surface of the electric wire W to be measured, as shown by the broken line, The generated magnetic flux φ mainly crosses the radial direction of the electric wire W to be measured.

第5図(C)の電線検査用コイルICは、分割コイル型
と呼称されており、被測定電線Wの周方向に沿って湾曲
した円弧板状の鉄心に線輪が巻回されており、破線で示
すように、発生させた磁束φを被測定電線Wの長手方向
に沿って主として外層付近に交差させるものとなる。
The electric wire inspection coil IC shown in FIG. 5(C) is called a split coil type, and a wire ring is wound around an arc plate-shaped iron core curved along the circumferential direction of the electric wire W to be measured. As shown by the broken line, the generated magnetic flux φ mainly crosses the vicinity of the outer layer along the longitudinal direction of the electric wire W to be measured.

また、第5図(D)の電線検査用コイルIDは、貫通コ
イル型と呼称されており、1本の素線を被測定電線Wの
表面に螺旋状に巻回してなるもので、破線で示すように
、発生させた磁束φが被測定電線Wの内部にまで到達す
る有効なものと考えられる。
The wire inspection coil ID shown in FIG. 5(D) is called a through-coil type, and is made by winding one strand of wire in a spiral around the surface of the wire W to be measured, as indicated by the broken line. As shown, the generated magnetic flux φ is considered to be effective in reaching the inside of the electric wire W to be measured.

「発明が解決しようとする課題] しかし、第5図(B )(C)に示す電線検査用コイル
IB−1cを使用して電線の検査を行なう場合には、磁
束φが電線外層付近の一部分だけに交差するために、電
線外層部の局部的な異常の検出精度は高まるが、電線内
層部の異常を検出することは困難である。一方、電線検
査用コイルIDは、電線の外層部及び内層部、即ち電線
の全層にわたって磁束φを交差させ得るために、電線全
層の異常の有無を検出することか可能であるが、しかし
この電線検査用コイルIDのみでは欠陥部が外層部分で
あるのか内層部分であるのかその位置を判別することが
できず、また、被測定電線Wに巻き付けなければならな
いので、作業性が悪く検査効率を低下させるなどの難点
がある。
"Problem to be Solved by the Invention" However, when inspecting an electric wire using the electric wire inspection coil IB-1c shown in FIGS. 5(B) and (C), the magnetic flux φ is This increases the accuracy of detecting local abnormalities in the outer layer of the wire, but it is difficult to detect abnormalities in the inner layer of the wire.On the other hand, the coil ID for wire inspection Since the magnetic flux φ can cross the inner layer, that is, all the layers of the wire, it is possible to detect the presence or absence of abnormalities in all the layers of the wire. However, with only this wire inspection coil ID, it is possible to detect defects in the outer layer. It is not possible to determine whether it is in the inner layer or not, and since it has to be wrapped around the electric wire W to be measured, there are problems such as poor workability and reduced inspection efficiency.

本発明は、上述の事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、電
線異常部分の識別性が高く、異常診断作業を効率良く行
なうものである。
The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances, and provides high identification of abnormal parts of electric wires, and efficiently performs abnormality diagnosis work.

「課題を解決するための手段」 本発明は、これらの課題を解決する二つの手段を提案し
ており、第1の手段は、被測定電線の全層に交番磁束を
交差させたときの磁気特性データを収集して被測定電線
の全層の異常の有無を判別し、異常が認められた場合に
、被測定電線の外層付近に交4番磁束を集中交差させて
磁気特性データを収集して外層部分の異常の有無を判別
することを特徴とする電線異常の診断方法である。
"Means for Solving the Problems" The present invention proposes two means for solving these problems. Collects characteristic data and determines whether there is an abnormality in all layers of the wire under test. If an abnormality is found, collects magnetic characteristic data by concentrating and intersecting No. 4 magnetic flux near the outer layer of the wire under test. This is a method for diagnosing an abnormality in an electric wire, which is characterized by determining whether or not there is an abnormality in the outer layer portion.

また、第2の手段は、被測定電線の外層付近に交番磁束
を集中交差させたときの磁気データを収集して、被測定
電線外層の異常の有無を判別し、異常が認められなかっ
た場合に、被測定電線の全層に交番磁束を交差させて磁
気特性データを収集して全層部分の異常の有無を判別す
ることを特徴とする電線異常の診断方法である。
The second method is to collect magnetic data when alternating magnetic flux concentrates and intersects near the outer layer of the wire to be measured, and to determine whether there is an abnormality in the outer layer of the wire to be measured, and if no abnormality is found. A method for diagnosing an abnormality in an electric wire is characterized in that alternating magnetic flux is passed through all the layers of the electric wire to be measured to collect magnetic characteristic data to determine whether or not there is an abnormality in all the layers.

「作用 」 第1の手段において、被測定電線の全層に交番磁束を交
差させたときに異常が認められない場合は、被測定電線
に欠陥が生じておらず、これが健全であることを意味し
、異常が認められた場合は、被測定電線の何処かに欠陥
があることを意味する。
``Effect'' In the first method, if no abnormality is recognized when alternating magnetic flux crosses all layers of the wire under test, it means that the wire under test has no defect and is sound. However, if an abnormality is observed, it means that there is a defect somewhere in the wire to be measured.

したがってこの場合において、続いて被測定電線の外層
付近に交番磁束を集中交差させることにより、外層部分
の異常の有無を判別して、異常が認められない場合は、
前記欠陥が内層部分にあることが確認され、また異常が
認められた場合は、前記欠陥が外層部分にあることが確
認される。
Therefore, in this case, the presence or absence of an abnormality in the outer layer is determined by concentrating and crossing the alternating magnetic flux near the outer layer of the wire to be measured, and if no abnormality is found,
It is confirmed that the defect is in the inner layer portion, and if an abnormality is observed, it is confirmed that the defect is in the outer layer portion.

第2の手段において、被測定電線の外層付近に交番磁束
を集中交差させたときに異常が認められた場合は、外層
部分に欠陥があることが確認され、また異常が認められ
ない場合は、被測定電線の他の部分に異常が認められる
か否かを、被測定電線の全層に交番磁束を交差させるこ
とにより診断し、全層部分に異常が認められない場合は
、被測定電線に欠陥が生じておらず、これが健全電線で
あることが確認され、また全層部分において異常が認め
られた場合には、被測定電線の内層部に欠陥があること
が確認される。
In the second method, if an abnormality is observed when alternating magnetic flux is concentrated and crossed near the outer layer of the wire to be measured, it is confirmed that there is a defect in the outer layer, and if no abnormality is observed, Diagnose whether or not an abnormality is observed in other parts of the wire under test by crossing alternating magnetic flux through all layers of the wire under test. If no abnormality is found in all layers of the wire, If no defects occur and it is confirmed that this is a sound wire, and an abnormality is found in all the layers, it is confirmed that there is a defect in the inner layer of the wire to be measured.

[実施例J 以下、本発明に係る電線異常の診断方法の実施例につい
て、図面を参照しながら説明する。
[Example J] Hereinafter, an example of the method for diagnosing electric wire abnormality according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

第1図は、方式の異なる2種類の検査用コイルを使用し
て、電線の異常の有無を診断するフローの例を示すもの
である。
FIG. 1 shows an example of a flow for diagnosing the presence or absence of abnormality in electric wires using two types of test coils of different methods.

この場合、2種類の検査用コイルとして被測定電線の全
1層に交番磁束を交差さけるものとして第5図(D)に
準する特性を有するごとく開発した第5図(A)に示す
ものと、被測定電線の外層付近に交番磁束を集中交差さ
せる第5図(C)に示すものとを使用する。なお、第5
図(A)に示す検査用コイルIAは、非磁性材料からな
る縦割り状円筒体に対して巻回状態に支持され、縦割り
箇所において分割されるコイル状線輪を縦割り箇所でコ
ネクタにより電気的および機械的に結合してなり、第5
図(A)に示すように、磁束φを被測定電線Wの全層に
交差させ得るものである。
In this case, two types of test coils are used: one shown in Figure 5 (A), which was developed to have characteristics similar to those shown in Figure 5 (D), and which avoids alternating magnetic flux from crossing all layers of the wire under test. , and the one shown in FIG. 5(C) in which alternating magnetic flux is concentrated and crossed near the outer layer of the wire to be measured is used. Furthermore, the fifth
The inspection coil IA shown in Figure (A) is supported in a wound state around a vertically divided cylindrical body made of a non-magnetic material, and a coiled wire ring that is divided at a vertically divided point is connected to a connector at a vertically divided point. electrically and mechanically coupled, and the fifth
As shown in Figure (A), the magnetic flux φ can be made to cross all layers of the electric wire W to be measured.

これら二つの検査用コイルlAおよびICを交互に被測
定電線Wに装着して、インピーダンスを求めるととらに
、標準電線(健全電線)との差の有無により、電線異常
の診断が行なわれる。
These two test coils IA and IC are alternately attached to the wire W to be measured to determine the impedance, and a diagnosis of wire abnormality is performed based on the presence or absence of a difference from the standard wire (healthy wire).

つまり、第1図のフローに示す評価診断フロー例による
論理によって、検出された欠陥が外層と内層とのいずれ
で生じているかを判定することができる。この場合の診
断フローをステップ順に説明する。
In other words, it is possible to determine whether the detected defect occurs in the outer layer or the inner layer using the logic according to the example evaluation/diagnosis flow shown in the flow of FIG. The diagnostic flow in this case will be explained step by step.

Sl:第5図(A)に示す方式の検査用コイルを使用し
て電線の内外層(全層)部分に交番磁束を交差させて、 S2:健全電線とのインピーダンスの差があるか否かを
判定することにより欠陥の有無を診断し、差が無い場合
はS3へ移行し、差がある場合はS4へ移行する。
SL: Using the testing coil shown in Figure 5 (A), cross an alternating magnetic flux across the inner and outer layers (all layers) of the wire, and S2: Check whether there is a difference in impedance with a sound wire. The presence or absence of a defect is diagnosed by determining, and if there is no difference, the process moves to S3, and if there is a difference, the process moves to S4.

S3:[診断1コ全層部分に欠陥が無いことが確認され
、作業を終了する。
S3: [It is confirmed that there are no defects in all layers of one diagnostic test piece, and the work is completed.

S4:第5図(C)に示す方式の検査用コイルを使用し
て、電線の外層部分に交番磁束を交差させて、S5:健
全電線とのインピーダンスの差があるか否かを判定する
ことにより欠陥の有無を診断し、差が無いか、またはそ
の差が僅かである場合はS6へ移行し、差がある場合は
S7へ移行する。
S4: Using the test coil shown in FIG. 5(C), cross an alternating magnetic flux across the outer layer of the electric wire, and S5: Determine whether there is a difference in impedance with a sound electric wire. If there is no difference or the difference is small, the process moves to S6, and if there is a difference, the process moves to S7.

S6:[診断2コ外層部分に欠陥がないことが確認され
、作業を終了する。
S6: [Diagnosis 2 It is confirmed that there are no defects in the outer layer portion, and the work is completed.

S7:[診断3]外層部分に欠陥があることが確認され
、作業を終了する。
S7: [Diagnosis 3] It is confirmed that there is a defect in the outer layer portion, and the work is ended.

[実験例コ 次いで、第2図ないし第4図により実験例を説明する。[Experiment example Next, an experimental example will be explained with reference to FIGS. 2 to 4.

該実験例では、第1図の実施例のフローチャートに準じ
て、第5図(A)に示す全層検査用コイルIA、第5図
(C)に示す外層検査用コイルIcの順にインピーダン
スを測定した。
In this experimental example, the impedance was measured in the order of the full-layer inspection coil IA shown in FIG. 5(A) and the outer layer inspection coil Ic shown in FIG. 5(C) according to the flowchart of the embodiment shown in FIG. did.

即ち、検査用コイルIAを被測定電線Wに装着してその
インピーダンスZ+nを測定し、このインピーダンスZ
、nと検査用コイルIAを標準電線(健全電線)に装着
して得たときのインピーダンスZ+oとの差 ΔZ 、ll= Z In  Z +oを求める。
That is, the test coil IA is attached to the wire W to be measured, its impedance Z+n is measured, and this impedance Z
, n and the impedance Z+o obtained by attaching the test coil IA to a standard electric wire (healthy electric wire), ΔZ, 11=Z In Z +o is determined.

同様に検査用コイルICを被測定電線Wに装着してその
インピーダンスZtnを測定し、このインピーダンスZ
ynと検査用コイルIcを標準電線に装着して得たとき
のインピーダンスZ 20との差ΔZtn=Ztn  
Zt。を求める。
Similarly, the test coil IC is attached to the wire W to be measured, and its impedance Ztn is measured.
Difference between yn and impedance Z20 obtained by attaching the test coil Ic to a standard electric wire ΔZtn=Ztn
Zt. seek.

なお、実験例において使用した検査用コイルIAおよび
tCの仕様は次の通りである。
The specifications of the test coils IA and tC used in the experimental example are as follows.

検査用コイルIAの仕様 0・3φエナメル線密巻き 巻数=60回 屓心直径:20+nmφ 検査用コイルICの仕様 0・3φエナメル線密巻き 巻数二60回 屓心直径:20mmφ コイル長さ(軸方向寸法):5mm 第2図は、実験例で比較される電線モデルを示しており
、サンプルSaは、鋼線の上にアルミ線を撚り合わせて
なる鋼心アルミ撚線(ACSR)の健全電線モデル、サ
ンプルsbは外層アルミ素線6本が腐食等により欠損し
ている電線モデル、サンプルScは内層アルミ素線6本
が腐食等により欠損している電線モデルであり、第2図
において、・印(黒く塗り潰した部分)は、欠損してい
る素線であることを意味する。
Specifications for inspection coil IA: Number of close turns of 0/3φ enameled wire = 60 turns Core diameter: 20+nmφ Specifications of inspection coil IC: Number of close turns of 0/3φ enameled wire: 260 turns Center diameter: 20mmφ Coil length (axis Directional dimension): 5 mm Figure 2 shows the electric wire model compared in the experimental example, and sample Sa is a sound electric wire of steel core aluminum stranded wire (ACSR) made by twisting aluminum wire on steel wire. The model, sample sb, is a wire model in which 6 outer layer aluminum wires are missing due to corrosion etc., and sample Sc is a wire model in which 6 inner layer aluminum wires are missing due to corrosion etc. In Fig. 2, The mark (blacked out part) means a missing strand.

これらの電線モデルについて、周波数50ないし100
0kHzにおける前述のインピーダンス差を求めた。そ
の結果を第3図および第4図に示す。
For these wire models, frequencies 50 to 100
The aforementioned impedance difference at 0 kHz was determined. The results are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.

第3図から明らかなように、第5図(A)例の検査用コ
イルIAによると、素線欠損箇所が外層および内層にあ
る場合の検出感度がそれぞれ良好であり、特に周波数が
高くなるにしたかってインピーダンス差が顕著になるも
のの、素線欠損箇所によるインピーダンスの差が少なく
、この全層検査の範囲では素線欠損箇所の違いによる特
性差が生じない。
As is clear from FIG. 3, according to the inspection coil IA of the example in FIG. 5(A), the detection sensitivity is good when the wire defect location is in the outer layer and the inner layer, especially as the frequency becomes higher. Therefore, although the difference in impedance becomes significant, the difference in impedance depending on the location where the wire is missing is small, and within the range of this full-layer inspection, no difference in characteristics occurs due to the location where the wire is missing.

これに対して、第4図から明らかなように、第5図(C
)例の検査用コイルIcによると、素線欠損箇所が外層
である場合の検出感度が良好であり、特に周波数が低い
領域から、内外層のインピーダンス差が顕著なしのとな
るため、欠陥箇所の判定が容易となる。
On the other hand, as is clear from Fig. 4, Fig. 5 (C
) According to the inspection coil Ic in the example, the detection sensitivity is good when the defective part of the wire is in the outer layer, and the impedance difference between the inner and outer layers becomes a noticeable difference, especially from the low frequency region, so it is easy to detect the defective part. Judgment becomes easier.

なお、第1図のフローに基づく説明では、全層部分の欠
陥の有無を判定した後に、外層部分の欠陥の有無を判定
するようにしたが、S4とStの手順を逆にする診断方
法を採ることもできる。
In addition, in the explanation based on the flow in FIG. 1, the presence or absence of defects in the outer layer portion is determined after determining the presence or absence of defects in all the layer portions, but a diagnosis method in which the steps of S4 and St are reversed may be used. You can also pick it up.

[発明の効果コ 本発明による電線異常の診断方法によれば、方式の異な
る2種類の検査用コイルを用いて電線の全層部分と外層
部分とに磁束を交差させて、それぞれの部分に欠陥があ
るかどうかを判別することにより、欠陥部分が電線の内
外層のいづれにあるかを診断確認することができ、その
場合に、欠陥の発生予想部分に適した検査用コイルと他
の検査用コイルとの使い分けにより、確実にかつ迅速に
識別できるなどの効果を奏する。
[Effects of the Invention] According to the method for diagnosing abnormalities in electric wires according to the present invention, two types of testing coils with different methods are used to cross magnetic flux through the entire layer portion and the outer layer portion of the wire, thereby detecting defects in each portion. By determining whether or not there is a defective part, it is possible to diagnose and confirm whether the defective part is located in the inner or outer layer of the wire. By using different coils, it is possible to reliably and quickly identify them.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は、本発明に係る電線異常の診断方法の実施例の
フローチャート、第2図(A)ないしくC)は、実験例
で比較される電線モデルの説明図、第3図は、全層検査
用コイルで求めたインピーダンス差と電線欠損箇所との
周波数特性図、第4図は外層検査用コイルで求めたイン
ピーダンス差と電線欠損箇所との周波数特性図、第5図
(A)ないしくD)は、電線検査に使用されるコイルモ
デルの説明図である。 IA−1,D・・・・・・電線検査用コイル、W・・・
・・・被測定電線。 第1図 第2図 (Aン 健/+、を練 外肩了ルミ素a6本ヌj夷 内贋了ルl舘′A、6参更積 第3図 第4図
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an embodiment of the electric wire abnormality diagnosis method according to the present invention, Fig. 2 (A) to C) is an explanatory diagram of an electric wire model compared in an experimental example, and Fig. Figure 4 is a frequency characteristic diagram of the impedance difference determined by the layer inspection coil and the wire defect location, Figure 4 is a frequency characteristic diagram of the impedance difference determined by the outer layer inspection coil and the wire defect location, and Figure 5 (A) or D) is an explanatory diagram of a coil model used for electric wire inspection. IA-1, D... Coil for electric wire inspection, W...
...Wire to be measured. Fig.1 Fig.2

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1・被測定電線の全層に交番磁束を交差させたときの磁
気特性データを収集して被測定電線の全層の異常の有無
を判別し、異常が認められた場合に、被測定電線の外層
付近に交番磁束を集中交差させて磁気特性データを収集
して外層部分の異常の有無を判別することを特徴とする
電線異常の診断方法。 2・被測定電線の外層付近に交番磁束を集中交差させた
ときの磁気データを収集して、被測定電線外層の異常の
有無を判別し、異常が認められなかった場合に、被測定
電線の全層に交番磁束を交差させて磁気特性データを収
集して全層部分の異常の有無を判別することを特徴とす
る電線異常の診断方法。
[Claims] 1. Collecting magnetic property data when alternating magnetic flux crosses all layers of the wire to be measured and determining whether or not there is an abnormality in all the layers of the wire to be measured, and when an abnormality is found. A method for diagnosing an abnormality in an electric wire, characterized in that alternating magnetic flux is focused and crossed near the outer layer of the electric wire to be measured, and magnetic property data is collected to determine whether or not there is an abnormality in the outer layer. 2. Collect magnetic data when alternating magnetic flux concentrates and crosses near the outer layer of the wire to be measured, determine whether there is an abnormality in the outer layer of the wire to be measured, and if no abnormality is found, A method for diagnosing an abnormality in a wire, characterized in that alternating magnetic flux is passed through all the layers to collect magnetic property data to determine whether or not there is an abnormality in all the layers.
JP13831989A 1989-05-31 1989-05-31 Electric wire abnormality diagnosis method Expired - Lifetime JPH0734606B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13831989A JPH0734606B2 (en) 1989-05-31 1989-05-31 Electric wire abnormality diagnosis method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13831989A JPH0734606B2 (en) 1989-05-31 1989-05-31 Electric wire abnormality diagnosis method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH033608A true JPH033608A (en) 1991-01-09
JPH0734606B2 JPH0734606B2 (en) 1995-04-12

Family

ID=15219119

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP13831989A Expired - Lifetime JPH0734606B2 (en) 1989-05-31 1989-05-31 Electric wire abnormality diagnosis method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0734606B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010236928A (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-21 Central Res Inst Of Electric Power Ind Eddy current flaw detection method and eddy current flaw detection sensor
CN116075719A (en) * 2020-09-10 2023-05-05 株式会社岛津制作所 Wire rope inspection device and wire rope inspection system

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS511035A (en) * 1974-06-21 1976-01-07 Fujitsu Ltd

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS511035A (en) * 1974-06-21 1976-01-07 Fujitsu Ltd

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010236928A (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-21 Central Res Inst Of Electric Power Ind Eddy current flaw detection method and eddy current flaw detection sensor
CN116075719A (en) * 2020-09-10 2023-05-05 株式会社岛津制作所 Wire rope inspection device and wire rope inspection system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0734606B2 (en) 1995-04-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7705589B2 (en) Sensor for detecting surface defects of metal tube using eddy current method
JP2007263946A (en) Eddy current flaw detection sensor and eddy current flaw detection method
US6040695A (en) Method and apparatus for inspection of components
JP3247666B2 (en) Flaw detection coil element and flaw detection coil
JPS63109367A (en) Flaw detecting sensor for conductive body
CN108333253A (en) A kind of Array eddy-current probe and detection method for steel rope fault defects detection
WO2020095354A1 (en) Magnetic-body inspection device and magnetic-body inspection system
EP2690433B1 (en) Broadband eddy current probe
JPH033608A (en) How to diagnose electrical wire abnormalities
JP5290020B2 (en) Eddy current flaw detection method and eddy current flaw detection sensor
JP2004028897A (en) Eddy current flaw detector
KR102283396B1 (en) Sensor Probe tesing System for Eddy Current Nondestructive Testing
JP2001183346A (en) Leakage magnetic flux inspection coil element, magnetic flux leakage inspection coil, and magnetic flux leakage inspection apparatus
JPH06123695A (en) Corrosion diagnosis method for buried metal
JP2000275223A (en) Inspecting tool and its using method
JP3076310B2 (en) Eddy current probe
JP2003130849A (en) High sensitivity defect inspection method
JPH05149926A (en) Metal wire filament flaw detection coil
KR0173100B1 (en) Wire Corrosion Detection Sensor
JP2001128328A (en) Wire inspection method and device
JPH1073631A (en) Insulated wire defect detection method and device
JPH08278289A (en) Ferromagnetic tube flaw detector and flaw detection method
JP3321648B2 (en) Method and apparatus for judging the quality of connection of steel core aluminum stranded wire
JPH081464B2 (en) Non-destructive detection device for buried conductors
JP2008026234A (en) Insulation failure detection method and apparatus