JPH0360882A - Method for deciding quality of welding state - Google Patents
Method for deciding quality of welding stateInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0360882A JPH0360882A JP1197469A JP19746989A JPH0360882A JP H0360882 A JPH0360882 A JP H0360882A JP 1197469 A JP1197469 A JP 1197469A JP 19746989 A JP19746989 A JP 19746989A JP H0360882 A JPH0360882 A JP H0360882A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- welding
- temperature distribution
- welded
- weld zone
- quality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)
- Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
A8発明の目的
(1)産業上の利用分野
本発明は、重合して溶接された被溶接物の溶接状態の良
否を、その溶接部から放射される赤外線の強度に基づい
て判定するための方法に関する。Detailed Description of the Invention A8 Purpose of the Invention (1) Industrial Application Field The present invention is a method for determining the quality of welding of a polymerized and welded workpiece based on the intensity of infrared rays emitted from the welded part. The present invention relates to a method for making a determination based on the present invention.
(2)従来の技術
従来、かかる溶接状態の良否判定方法として、特開昭5
0−79378号公報に記載されたものが知られている
。(2) Conventional technology Conventionally, as a method for determining the quality of welding conditions,
The one described in Japanese Patent No. 0-79378 is known.
上記方法は、溶接完了直後の高温状態にある被溶接物の
溶接部から放射される赤外線を赤外線温度検出器で検出
することにより該溶接部の温度分布を測定し、その結果
に基づいて溶接状態の良否を判定するようになっている
。The above method uses an infrared temperature detector to detect infrared rays emitted from the welded part of the workpiece, which is in a high temperature state immediately after welding is completed, to measure the temperature distribution of the welded part, and based on the results, the welding state is determined. It is designed to judge the quality of the product.
(3)発明が解決しようとする課題
しかしながら、上記従来の方法では、被溶接物の互いに
近接した複数の部位を連続して溶接する場合、溶接直後
の溶接部から放射される赤外線の検出作業と隣接する他
の部位の溶接作業が並行して行われるため、前記溶接作
業によって発生する赤外線の影響で本来の赤外線温度検
出器の検出精度が低下してしまう不都合があった。この
ために、被溶接物を溶接する際に両者の溶接状態が不良
であっても、他の部位から放射される赤外線の影響で溶
接状態が良であると判定される場合があった。(3) Problems to be Solved by the Invention However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, when multiple parts of the workpiece that are close to each other are successively welded, it is difficult to detect infrared rays emitted from the welded part immediately after welding. Since welding work on other adjacent parts is performed in parallel, there is a problem in that the detection accuracy of the infrared temperature detector is reduced due to the influence of infrared rays generated by the welding work. For this reason, when welding objects to be welded, even if the welding condition of both objects is poor, it may be determined that the welding condition is good due to the influence of infrared rays emitted from other parts.
本発明は、前述の事情に鑑みてなされたもので、他の溶
接部の熱影響を除去することにより赤外線強度を精密に
検出し、以て溶接部の溶接状態の良否の判定を確実に行
うことが可能な方法を提供することを目的とする。The present invention was made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances, and accurately detects the intensity of infrared rays by eliminating the thermal influence of other welds, thereby reliably determining whether the welding condition of the weld is good or bad. The purpose is to provide a method that makes it possible.
B1発明の構成
(1)課題を解決するための手段
前記目的を達成するために、本発明は、重合して溶接さ
れた被溶接物の溶接状態の良否を溶接完了後に判定する
溶接状態の良否判定方法であって、溶接完了後の被溶接
物を冷却する工程と、前記被溶接物の溶接部を局部的に
加熱する工程と、前記溶接部近傍の温度分布を赤外線温
度検出器により測定する工程と、測定された温度分布か
ら溶接状態の良否を判定する工程からなることを特徴と
する。B1 Structure of the Invention (1) Means for Solving the Problems In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for determining the quality of welding of a welded object that has been polymerized and welded after completion of welding. The determination method includes a step of cooling the workpiece after welding is completed, a step of locally heating the welding part of the workpiece, and measuring the temperature distribution near the welding part with an infrared temperature detector. and a step of determining the quality of the welding condition from the measured temperature distribution.
(2)作 用
前述の本発明によれば、溶接作業の完了した被溶接物を
一旦冷却した後、検査すべき溶接部のみを局部的に加熱
する。次に赤外線温度検出器で前記加熱した溶接部から
放射される赤外線を検出することにより前記溶接部近傍
の温度分布を測定する。続いて測定された温度分布を良
品の温度分布あるいは不良品の温度分布と比較すること
により、前記溶接部の良否を判定する。このとき、被溶
接物は溶接完了後に一旦冷却され、その後に検査すべき
溶接部のみを局部的に加熱して温度分布を測定している
ので、他の部分から検出誤差の原因となる赤外線が放射
されることがなく、正確な溶接状態の判定が可能となる
。(2) Effects According to the above-described present invention, after the welding work has been completed, the welded object is once cooled, and then only the welded portion to be inspected is locally heated. Next, the temperature distribution in the vicinity of the welded area is measured by detecting infrared rays emitted from the heated welded area using an infrared temperature detector. Subsequently, the quality of the welded portion is determined by comparing the measured temperature distribution with the temperature distribution of a non-defective product or the temperature distribution of a defective product. At this time, the workpiece is cooled once after welding is completed, and then only the welded part to be inspected is locally heated to measure the temperature distribution, so infrared rays from other parts can cause detection errors. No radiation is emitted, making it possible to accurately determine the welding state.
(3)実施例 以下、図面に基づいて本発明の詳細な説明する。(3) Examples Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on the drawings.
第1図〜第4図は本発明の一実施例を示すもので、第1
図は溶接部の加熱工程を示す図、第2図は溶接部の温度
分布の測定工程を示す図、第3図は被溶接物の形状を示
す図、第4図は溶接部の温度分布の例を示すグラフであ
る。Figures 1 to 4 show one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 2 shows the process of heating the welded part, Figure 2 shows the process of measuring the temperature distribution of the welded part, Figure 3 shows the shape of the workpiece, and Figure 4 shows the temperature distribution of the welded part. Figure 2 is a graph showing an example.
第3図に示すように、被溶接物は2枚の板材W1、W2
よりなり、両板材W、、W、の縁部を所定の接合幅を以
て重ね合わせた状態でレーザービームを用いた連続溶接
により溶着される。溶接はレーザービームを所定の時間
間隔をおいて2回照射することにより行われ、1回目の
照射で第1ビードB1が、2回目の照射で第2ビードB
2が形成される。各ビードB、、B2は、照射するレー
ザービームを移動させることにより2本の短い平行線状
に形成される。As shown in Figure 3, the objects to be welded are two plates W1 and W2.
The edges of both plates W, , W are overlapped with each other with a predetermined joining width and are welded by continuous welding using a laser beam. Welding is performed by irradiating the laser beam twice at a predetermined time interval, the first bead B1 is irradiated with the laser beam twice, and the second bead B1 is irradiated with the second bead B1 with the second irradiation.
2 is formed. Each bead B, B2 is formed into two short parallel lines by moving the irradiating laser beam.
上記被溶接物は溶接完了後に一旦冷却され、しかる後に
第1図に示すように、加熱装置1を用いて溶接部の加熱
が行われる。すなわち、加熱装置lは電熱線2から熱を
受けて高温状態に保たれるヒータ3を備えており、この
ヒータ3を両ビードB1.B2間に当接させることによ
り上側の板材W1が局部的に加熱される。After the welding is completed, the object to be welded is once cooled, and then, as shown in FIG. 1, the welded part is heated using a heating device 1. That is, the heating device 1 includes a heater 3 that receives heat from the heating wire 2 and is maintained at a high temperature, and this heater 3 is connected to both beads B1. The upper plate material W1 is locally heated by bringing it into contact between B2.
板材W1の溶接部、すなわち平行な両ビードB1.82
間が所定の温度に加熱されると加熱装置1を取り除き、
第2図に示すように周知のサーモグラフィー等の赤外線
温度検出器4によって溶接部の温度分布が検出される。Welded part of plate material W1, that is, both parallel beads B1.82
When the space is heated to a predetermined temperature, the heating device 1 is removed,
As shown in FIG. 2, the temperature distribution of the weld zone is detected by an infrared temperature detector 4 such as a well-known thermograph.
赤外線温度検出器4は物体がその温度に応じて表面から
放射する赤外線の強度を検出し、その結果を増幅演算処
理することにより物体の温度分布を画像信号として出力
するものである。赤外線温度検出器4にはモニタ5が接
続されており、前記物体の温度分布を画像として直接目
視できるようになっている。The infrared temperature detector 4 detects the intensity of infrared rays emitted from the surface of an object according to its temperature, and outputs the temperature distribution of the object as an image signal by amplifying and calculating the results. A monitor 5 is connected to the infrared temperature detector 4, so that the temperature distribution of the object can be directly viewed as an image.
第4図(a)〜第4図(d)は、上記赤外線温度検出器
4によって測定した被溶接物の溶接部における上側の板
材W1の表面の二次元的な温度分布と、そのP−P線あ
るいはQ−Q線断面における一次元的な温度分布p、
qを示している。FIGS. 4(a) to 4(d) show the two-dimensional temperature distribution on the surface of the upper plate material W1 at the welding part of the workpiece measured by the infrared temperature detector 4, and its P-P One-dimensional temperature distribution p in the line or Q-Q line cross section,
It shows q.
第3図(a)は正常な溶接部の状態を示すもので、面溶
接ビードB、、B2の近傍で温度の急変が認められ、そ
の外側の領域で温度が急激に低下している。これは、完
全な溶接により溶接ビードB、、B2が上下の板材W、
、W、を貫通しているために、この溶接ビードB、、B
2を介して上側の板材W1から下側の板材W2に急速に
熱が伝達し、上側の板材WIの温度が前記溶接ビードB
の近傍において低下するためである。FIG. 3(a) shows the state of a normal weld zone, where a sudden change in temperature is observed in the vicinity of surface weld beads B, B2, and a sudden drop in temperature in the area outside of these beads. This is because the weld bead B, B2 is completely welded to the upper and lower plates W,
, W, this weld bead B, ,B
2, heat is rapidly transferred from the upper plate material W1 to the lower plate material W2, and the temperature of the upper plate material WI increases to the welding bead B.
This is because it decreases near .
第3図(b)は第2ビードB、において溶接不良がある
場合の温度分布を示すもので、正常な第1ビードB1の
近傍においては前述と同様に急激な温度低下が生じてい
るのに対し、溶接不良部(右側)においては温度低下が
緩やかになっている。これは、溶接不良部において第2
ビードB2が上側の板材Wlから下側の板材W、に充分
に貫通していないので、熱が上側の板材W、から下側の
板材W2に逃げることができず、その結果第2ビードB
2の近傍において急激な温度低下が生じないためである
。Figure 3(b) shows the temperature distribution when there is a welding defect in the second bead B. Although there is a rapid temperature drop near the normal first bead B1, as described above, On the other hand, in the defective welding area (on the right side), the temperature decreases more slowly. This is because the second
Since the bead B2 does not sufficiently penetrate from the upper plate Wl to the lower plate W, heat cannot escape from the upper plate W to the lower plate W2, and as a result, the second bead B
This is because a sudden temperature drop does not occur in the vicinity of 2.
第3図(c)は溶接ビードBl、B2の各位置によって
溶接状態が異なる場合の温度分布を示すものである。す
なわち、溶接ビードB、、B2の上部に対応するP−P
線断面における温度分布p(実線図示)では、第2ビー
ドB2における温度変化が緩やかになっており、この部
分に溶接不良箇所があることを示している。逆に、溶接
ビードB、、B2の下部に対応するQ−Q線断面におけ
る温度分布q(破線図示)では、第1ビードB1におけ
る温度変化が緩やかになっており、この部分に溶接不良
箇所があることを示している。FIG. 3(c) shows the temperature distribution when the welding state differs depending on the position of the weld beads Bl and B2. That is, P-P corresponding to the upper part of weld bead B, B2
In the temperature distribution p (shown by the solid line) in the line cross section, the temperature change in the second bead B2 is gradual, indicating that there is a welding defect in this portion. On the other hand, in the temperature distribution q (shown by the broken line) in the Q-Q line cross section corresponding to the lower part of weld beads B, B2, the temperature change in the first bead B1 is gradual, and there is a welding defect in this part. It shows that there is.
第3図(d)は両方の溶接ビードB、、B2が下側の板
材W、に充分達していない溶接不良がある場合の温度分
布を示すもので、この場合には上側の板材W1から下側
の板材W、に主としてその接触面のみを通して緩慢に熱
伝達が行われるために、面溶接ビードB、、B、の近傍
における温度低下が緩やかになっている。Figure 3(d) shows the temperature distribution when there is a welding defect in which both weld beads B, B2 do not fully reach the lower plate material W. In this case, the temperature distribution is shown from the upper plate material W1 to Since heat is transferred slowly to the side plate material W mainly through its contact surface, the temperature decrease in the vicinity of the surface weld beads B, B, is gradual.
上述のようにして、測定した溶接部の温度分布から溶接
状態の良否が判定されると、加熱した溶接部を再び冷却
し、しかる後に次の溶接部を局部的に加熱してその溶接
状態の良否の判定が行われる。その際、検査のための加
熱は低温であるために、その冷却は速やかに行われる。As described above, when the quality of the weld is judged from the measured temperature distribution of the weld, the heated weld is cooled again, and then the next weld is locally heated to check the weld state. A pass/fail judgment is made. At that time, since the heating for inspection is at a low temperature, the cooling is performed quickly.
以上、本発明の実施例を詳述したが、本発明は、前記実
施例に限定されるものではなく、特許請求の範囲に記載
された本発明を逸脱することなく種々の小設計変更を行
うことが可能である。Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and various small design changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention described in the claims. Is possible.
例えば、溶接部の温度分布をモニタに表示する代わりに
、グラフィックレコーダに記録するようにしてもよい。For example, instead of displaying the temperature distribution of the weld on a monitor, it may be recorded on a graphic recorder.
また、各種の溶接不良に対応する温度分布のパターンを
予めコンピュータに記憶させておき、測定した温度分布
を前記記憶した温度分布と比較することにより、溶接状
態の良否を自動的に判定するようにしてもよい。また、
溶接部を加熱する手段は実施例のものに限らず、輻射熱
による加熱や温風による加熱を用いることができ、この
場合、溶接部の加熱と温度分布の測定を並行して行うこ
とも可能である。In addition, temperature distribution patterns corresponding to various welding defects are stored in advance in the computer, and by comparing the measured temperature distribution with the stored temperature distribution, the quality of the welding condition is automatically determined. You can. Also,
The means for heating the welded part is not limited to those in the embodiments, and heating by radiant heat or heating by hot air can be used. In this case, it is also possible to heat the welded part and measure the temperature distribution in parallel. be.
C1発明の効果
前述の本発明によれば、溶接作業が完了した後に該被溶
接物を一旦冷却し、その後に所定の溶接部のみを局部的
に加熱して放射される赤外線からその温度分布を測定し
ているので、複数の溶接部が隣接して配設されている場
合にも、隣接する溶接部からの熱的、影響により赤外線
温度検出器の検出精度に悪影響が及ぶことがない。した
がって、溶接部の温度分布と溶接状態との間に正確な相
関関係が得られ、溶接状態の良否の的確−な判定が可能
となる。C1 Effect of the Invention According to the above-mentioned invention, after the welding work is completed, the workpiece is cooled down, and then only the predetermined welded part is locally heated and its temperature distribution is determined from the infrared rays emitted. Therefore, even when a plurality of welds are arranged adjacent to each other, the detection accuracy of the infrared temperature detector will not be adversely affected by the thermal influence from the adjacent welds. Therefore, an accurate correlation can be obtained between the temperature distribution of the welded part and the welding condition, and it becomes possible to accurately determine whether the welding condition is good or bad.
第1図〜第4図は本発明の一実施例を示すもので、第1
図は溶接部の加熱工程を示す図、第2図は溶接部の温度
分布の測定工程を示す図、第3図は被溶接物の形状を示
す図、第4図は溶接部の温度分布の例を示すグラフであ
る。
w、、W2・・・板材(被溶接物)
4、赤外線温度検出器
特許
出
願人
本田技研工業株式会社Figures 1 to 4 show one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 2 shows the process of heating the welded part, Figure 2 shows the process of measuring the temperature distribution of the welded part, Figure 3 shows the shape of the workpiece, and Figure 4 shows the temperature distribution of the welded part. Figure 2 is a graph showing an example. w,, W2... Plate material (object to be welded) 4. Infrared temperature detector patent applicant Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Claims (1)
完了後に判定する溶接状態の良否判定方法であって、 溶接完了後の被溶接物を冷却する工程と、前記被溶接物
の溶接部を局部的に加熱する工程と、前記溶接部近傍の
温度分布を赤外線温度検出器により測定する工程と、測
定された温度分布から溶接状態の良否を判定する工程か
らなる、溶接状態の良否判定方法。[Scope of Claims] A method for determining the quality of welding of a welded object that has been polymerized and welded after welding is completed, comprising: cooling the welded object after welding is completed; It consists of a step of locally heating the welding part of the workpiece, a step of measuring the temperature distribution near the welding part with an infrared temperature detector, and a step of determining the quality of the welding state from the measured temperature distribution, Method for determining the quality of welding.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1197469A JPH0360882A (en) | 1989-07-28 | 1989-07-28 | Method for deciding quality of welding state |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1197469A JPH0360882A (en) | 1989-07-28 | 1989-07-28 | Method for deciding quality of welding state |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0360882A true JPH0360882A (en) | 1991-03-15 |
Family
ID=16375009
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1197469A Pending JPH0360882A (en) | 1989-07-28 | 1989-07-28 | Method for deciding quality of welding state |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0360882A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0634564A (en) * | 1992-07-14 | 1994-02-08 | Nkk Corp | Steel plate weld inspection method |
| US5674415A (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 1997-10-07 | The University Of Chicago | Method and apparatus for real time weld monitoring |
| JP7709092B1 (en) * | 2024-10-11 | 2025-07-16 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Damage inspection method |
| JP7709093B1 (en) * | 2024-10-24 | 2025-07-16 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Damage inspection method |
-
1989
- 1989-07-28 JP JP1197469A patent/JPH0360882A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0634564A (en) * | 1992-07-14 | 1994-02-08 | Nkk Corp | Steel plate weld inspection method |
| US5674415A (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 1997-10-07 | The University Of Chicago | Method and apparatus for real time weld monitoring |
| JP7709092B1 (en) * | 2024-10-11 | 2025-07-16 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Damage inspection method |
| JP7709093B1 (en) * | 2024-10-24 | 2025-07-16 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Damage inspection method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8541746B2 (en) | Process and system for the nondestructive quality determination of a weld seam, and a welding device | |
| JP5028494B2 (en) | Automatic testing method for material joints | |
| US12466002B2 (en) | Laser welding quality inspection method and laser welding quality inspection apparatus | |
| CN107081503A (en) | The infrared nondestructive detection device and its Infrared Non-destructive Testing method of a kind of arc-welding quality | |
| JP2009520984A (en) | Steel plate welded part online detection device and method | |
| JPH07185849A (en) | Method for process control and / or quality control during laser butt welding of plates and laser welding apparatus for performing the method | |
| JP2023514403A (en) | How to Analyze Welded Connections During Laser Welding of Workpieces | |
| JP4140218B2 (en) | Inspection method and apparatus for laser welds | |
| JP2009515705A (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating the joint location of a workpiece | |
| JP2009515705A5 (en) | ||
| US20230051399A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for inspecting a fusion joint | |
| US20080237197A1 (en) | System and method for welding and real time monitoring of seam welded parts | |
| US4083223A (en) | Nondestructive inspection method for spot-welded joints | |
| CN206764093U (en) | A kind of infrared nondestructive detection device of arc-welding quality | |
| JPH0360882A (en) | Method for deciding quality of welding state | |
| JP2017078624A (en) | Sample bondability inspection method and inspection apparatus | |
| Venkatraman et al. | Thermography for online detection of incomplete penetration and penetration depth estimation | |
| JPH1058170A (en) | Method and device for judging quality of laser beam welding | |
| EP0554888B1 (en) | Method for testing spot welds | |
| JP7669051B2 (en) | Method for inspecting welds, particularly spot welds - Patents.com | |
| JP3238664B2 (en) | Inspection method of laser weld | |
| KR102757908B1 (en) | A welding apparaus with temperature measurement unit protection function and non-destructive thermal analysis function | |
| JP7398241B2 (en) | Lap joint welding inspection device and method | |
| JP2008122360A (en) | Quality evaluation method and apparatus for resin welds | |
| JPS61212494A (en) | Welding quality detection device |