JPH0361721B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0361721B2
JPH0361721B2 JP61035093A JP3509386A JPH0361721B2 JP H0361721 B2 JPH0361721 B2 JP H0361721B2 JP 61035093 A JP61035093 A JP 61035093A JP 3509386 A JP3509386 A JP 3509386A JP H0361721 B2 JPH0361721 B2 JP H0361721B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
caf
bath
molten steel
treatment agent
cao
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP61035093A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS62196317A (en
Inventor
Koichi Endo
Toshuki Kaneko
Hideo Yaoi
Seiji Aso
Yasuo Obana
Hideyuki Takahama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP61035093A priority Critical patent/JPS62196317A/en
Publication of JPS62196317A publication Critical patent/JPS62196317A/en
Publication of JPH0361721B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0361721B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Landscapes

  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

産業上の利用分野 本発明は、MgOを含む塩基性耐火物をライニ
ングした反応槽を用いて溶鋼を脱硫処理す場合に
おいて、耐火物の溶損を防止しつつ、脱硫反応を
効率良く行うための処理方法に関するものであ
り、更には、同時に溶鋼の介存物低減をも効率良
く行う方法に関するものである。 従来の技術 最近、ラインパイプ材の耐水素誘起割れ特性
や、海洋構造材のラメラテイアー特性を中心に、
鋼材性質に関する要求の厳格化が著しくなつてき
た。このような要求に応えるためには、溶鋼の硫
黄(以下Sと言う)の含有量を極力低減すること
が必須であり、更にはガス成分の窒素(以下Nと
言う)、水素(以下Hという)、酸化物系介在物量
をも低減しなければならない。 溶鉄の脱硫方法には、溶銑段階で行う溶鉄脱硫
法と、溶鋼段階で行う溶鋼脱硫法に大別される
が、1.0pppm以下の[S]濃の極低硫鋼を溶製す
るために、溶銑、溶鋼両方の処理を組合せことが
必要である。 溶鋼脱硫法として従来は、取鍋溶鋼中にCaO系
の複合混合物やCa合金をキヤリヤーガスと共に
吹込むインジエクシヨン方法が良く知られてい
る。この方法は、インジエクシヨンによる強撹拌
によつて形成される強力なスラグ−メタル間反応
により脱硫することを特徴としている。 しかしながら、この方法のような強撹拌でのス
ラグ−メタル間反応を主体とする脱硫処理では、
処理中に脱燐スラグからの復燐、Al等の合金添
加歩留り低下を生じやすく、又温度降下も比較的
大きくなる等の問題がある。加えて強撹拌によつ
て生じる溶鋼表面の乱れによつて、大気やスラグ
から溶鋼へのガス成分−特にH、N等−の吸収は
避けられないので、低窒素溶鋼や厚板材のように
H、Nをも同時に低減する必要のある鋼種を溶製
するためには、更にRHあるいはDH等の脱ガス
工程が必要になり、処理工程の追加による溶鋼温
度降下量の増大に対応して溶鋼のスーパーヒート
が必要になる等、溶鋼処理量の増大は避けられ
ず、更には品質にも悪影響が生じていることが多
い。 このような諸問題を解決する手段として、最近
空槽への溶鋼上真昇中に脱硫剤をキヤリヤガスと
共に吹込み、脱硫と同時に脱ガスを行う処理方法
が開発された。中でも特開昭60−59011のごとく、
浴面上のスラグを実質的に撹拌、又は流動させる
ことなく、脱硫剤を添加して、該浴中で主要な脱
硫反応を完了する脱硫方法においては、滓化性の
良好な少なくとも重量濃度%、望ましくは40%の
CaF2を含み、残部分がCaOを主成分とする処理
剤を用いることによつて、極低硫でかつ〔N〕、
〔O〕、および〔H〕含有量の少ない溶鋼を、低処
理剤原単位で得られるに至つている。 しかしながら、本発明者らがさらに研究を重ね
た結果、特開昭60−59011の方法は、次に示す問
題を有することが判明した。 発明が解決しようとする問題点 (i) 特開昭60−59011に用いられる処理剤は、高
脱硫能を有する。しかしながら、処理剤中に含
まれるCaF2濃度が20重量%以上と高いため、
一般に溶鋼の反応槽として用いられるMgOを
含む塩基性耐火物、すなわちマグネシヤ質、マ
グネシヤカーボン質、マグネシヤクローム質、
ドロマイト質、スピネル質、等を単独又は混合
して製造した耐火物の溶損を助長する。したが
つて、極低硫鋼の溶製頻度が増加した場合に
は、反応槽の寿命を縮少し、耐火物コストを高
める結果となつた。 (ii) 特開昭60−59011の脱硫方法を、介在物量が
比較的多い溶鋼に適用した場合には、浴中に吹
込んだ処理剤と浴内の酸化物系在物の凝集合体
により、処理剤中にAl2O3等の介在物成分が吸
収される。 これにより、処理剤の脱硫能が低下するため、
〔S〕≦5ppmの極低硫鋼を得る場合には、CaF2
度の高い処理剤の吹込み原単位が高くなる。した
がつて、上記したように、反応槽の寿命を縮少
し、耐火物コストを高める結果となつた。 又、同法は浴面のスラグを実質的に撹拌、又は
流動させることがないので、取鍋スラグや大気の
巻込みを抑制できる利点がある。しかしながら、
極低硫鋼を溶製するため、融点の低い高CaF2
度の処理剤を大量に吹込んだ場合には、取鍋スラ
グ下面に高CaF2濃度の処理剤が堆積することに
よつてスラグの融点が著しく低下し、スラグ上面
まで溶融状態となる。このような場合には、全ス
ラグ中の酸素の移動が容易となるため、スラグか
ら溶鋼へ酸素が侵入しやすくなる。 加えて、このような溶融スラグは、後工程の鋳
造段階において、鋳型、あるいはタンデイシユへ
の注入流が生じる渦によつて浴内に巻き込まれや
すく、新たな介在物と成り得る。したがつて、脱
硫と介在物低減の両方を効率良く行うためには、
新たな方法の開発が必要となつた。 問題を解決するための手段 本発明は、上記した従来の溶鋼脱流処理におけ
る問題点を解決し、処理剤の〔S〕の低減能力を
損ねることなく、かつ、MgOを主成分とする塩
基性耐化物の溶損を極力防止することによつて、
溶鋼を経済的に効率良く脱硫するため、次の手段
を用いる。すなわち、(1)MgOを含む塩基性耐火
物をライニングした反応槽において溶鋼脱硫処理
を行う場合に、浴中に吹込んだキヤリヤガスが該
浴内を浮上して到達する浴の上面部分を減圧又は
不活性ガス雰囲気に保持し、且つスラグを実質的
に存在せしめることなく、不活性ガスをキヤリヤ
ガスとして、CaO、CaF2、およびMgOと、その
他不避的成分から成り、MgOが10〜60重量%、
重量比で{CaF2/(CaO+CaF2)}×100=20〜
80%からなる第1の処理剤を浴中に吹込むと共
に、これの吹込前、及び又は吹込後に、CaF2
びCaOを主成分とし残部が不可避的成分からな
り、且つ上記CaF2及びCaOからなる主成分中の
CaF2濃度が20重量%以下である第2の処理剤を、
不活性ガスをキヤリヤガスとして上記浴中に吹込
むことを特徴とする溶鋼の方法及び(2)MgOを含
む塩基性耐火物をライニングした反応槽において
溶鋼脱硫処理を行う場合に、浴中に吹込んだキヤ
リヤガスが該浴内を浮上して到達する浴の上面部
分を減圧又は不活性ガス雰囲気に保持し、且つス
ラグを実質的に存在せしめることく、不活性ガス
をキヤリヤガスとして、CaO、CaF2、および
MgOと、その他不可避的成分から成り、MgOが
10〜60重量%、重量比で{CaF2/(CaO+
CaF2)}×100=20〜80%からなる第1の処理剤を
浴中に吹込むと共に、これの吹込前、及び又は吹
込後に、CaF2及びCaOを主成分とし残部が不可
避的成分からなり、且つ上記CaF2及びCaOから
なる主成分中のCaF2濃度が20重量%以下である
第2の処理剤を、不活性ガスをキヤリヤガスとし
て上記浴中に吹込み、次いで浴面上のスラグを実
質的に撹拌又は流動せさせることなく、不活性ガ
スを溶鋼内に吹込む処理を、行うことを特徴とす
る溶鋼の処理方法である。 本発明において用いる処理剤において、通常不
可避的に含まれる不純物としては、Al2O3、SiO2
等があり、それぞれの含有量は重量濃度で3%以
下である。 作 用 本発明は、第1の処理剤として、CaO、CaF2
およびMgOと、その他不可避的成分から成り、
MgOが10〜60重量%、重量比で{CaF2/(CaO
+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%の脱硫処理剤を用い
る。かくすることにより、MgO製耐火物容器内
で溶解した浴面上にスラグを形成せしめない溶鋼
に対し、該脱硫処理剤を添加しても、第1図イに
示すように、約60%の高脱硫率が得られる。
MgOの重量濃度が60%までの範囲では、MgOを
含まないものに対して、若干の脱硫率の低下に留
まる。しかも、この範囲のMgOの含有量におい
ては、特開昭60−59011に示されている脱流率の
CaF2濃度依存性は損なわれない。すなわち、重
量比で{CaF2/(CaO+CaF2)}×100≧40%の
範囲では、MgO60重量%以下の場合に70%以上
の高脱硫率を示す。 さらに、種々のMgO濃度に保つた重量比で
{CaF2/(CaO+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%の処理
剤中に、MgO−Cr2O3系の耐火物棒(10mm径)を
10分間浸漬した場合の最大溶損量を第1図ロに示
す。{CaF2/(CaO+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%の
範囲では、いずれもMgOの重量濃度が10%以上
の場合、耐火物の溶損量が極めて小さくなる。 又、本発明では、第3図に示すように、浴中に
吹込んだキヤリヤガスが該浴内を浮上して、到達
する浴の上面部分を、減圧又は不活性ガス雰囲気
に保持し、かつスラグを実質的に存在せしめるこ
となく上記脱硫処理剤を浴中に吹込む。かくする
ことにより第8図に示す従来の脱硫用撹拌容器と
異なり、脱硫反応を鍋内溶鋼上面のスラグの影響
を受けにくい環境又は雰囲気、つまり溶鋼浴中で
行うことを可能としたので、従来方法のように溶
鋼と鍋内上面のスラグとスラグ−メタルの強力な
直接反応が不要となり、これによつてスラグの流
動、撹拌から生じる処理中の復燐や処理比の復燐
が実質的には皆無に等しいばかりでなく、従来の
溶鋼脱流方法で実施されている処理前の除滓やス
ラグの改質の必要もなくなり、処理費の大巾な節
減を可能とする。 又、CaF2を多量に使用することによつて懸念
される取鍋の耐火物溶損は、本発明の脱硫が溶鋼
中で主要な反応を完了するので、効率が高く、脱
硫処理剤原単位が大巾に低減し、更にはスラグラ
インの流動がなく、結果的には実質的に問題とな
らないまでに軽減する。加えて、脱硫能を促進す
るために塩基性取鍋を用いる必要もなく、取鍋耐
火材費の低減効果も大きい。 本発明は、第3図に示すような鍋内溶鋼上面の
スラグの影響を受けにくい環境で撹拌し、反応せ
しめるため、本来取鍋スラグからの酸素源の供給
および取鍋スラグ巻込み等による溶鋼の清浄性の
悪化が起こりにくいのである。しかしながら、脱
硫処理剤原単位の高い極低硫鋼溶製時のように、
高CaF2濃度の脱硫処理剤が大量に浴面上のスラ
グ下面に堆積することによつて、スラグの融点が
著しく低下し、スラグの上面まで溶融した場合に
は、前述したように、全スラグ中の酸素の移動が
容易となるため、スラグから溶鋼への酸素が侵入
しやすくなる。又、このような溶融スラグは、後
工程の鋳造段階において、鋳型、あるいはタンデ
イシユへの注入流が生じる渦によつて浴内に巻き
込まれやすく、新たな介在物と成り得る。 加えて、前述したように、介在物の比較的多い
溶鋼を脱硫する場合においては、浴内に吹込んだ
脱硫処理剤へAl2O3等の介在物が凝集し、脱硫処
理剤の脱硫能が低下する弊害が生じる。 上記した、種々の問題を解決し、溶鋼を高清浄
度に保ちながら、かつ極低硫域まで高効率の脱硫
を行うため、本発明では前記第2の処理剤即ち
CaO−CaF2を主成分とし、CaF2濃度が重量%表
示で(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+(%CaF2)}≦0.2
なる介在物低減用処理剤を溶鋼内へ吹込む処理を
脱硫処理剤吹込み前および又は後に実施する。か
くすることにより、脱硫処理剤吹込み前及び又は
後の溶鋼内の介在物量を効率良く低減することが
できる。 すなわち、第2図にCaO−CaF2系処理剤を溶
鋼内へ吹込んだ場合に、処理剤中へ吸収される介
在物吸収量におよぼす処理剤中のCaOとCaF2
割合の影響をAl2O3系介在物の例で示す。CaO−
CaF2系処理剤においては(%CaF2)/{(%
CaO)+(%CaF2)}≦0.2とすることにより、処理
剤中へのAl2O3系介在物吸収量を極めて大きくす
ることができる。 このようにして、一旦介在物低減用処理剤に介
在物が吸収されると、浮上しにくいクラスター状
および静止浴中でも非球状で存在する高融点の
Al2O3系介在物が溶融状態となり、静止浴中では
球状で観察される浮きやすい介在物に変化して浮
上する。 又、Al脱酸前の溶鋼中に存在するFeO、FeO
−MnO系介在物、およびSiO2−MnO系介在物の
ように、低融点で静止浴中では球状で観察される
にもかかわらず比重が大きいがため浮きにくいも
のに対しても、比重の小さい介在物低減用処理剤
と凝集し介在物の比重低減をもたらし、浮上を促
進する。 本発明は、上記した処理剤を浴中に吹込むにあ
たつて、浴面上のスラグを実質的に浴中に巻込ま
ないで該浴(溶鋼)を撹拌又は流動させるため、
第3図に示すごとき反応槽の循環路に減圧槽又は
不活性ガス雰囲気槽を用いて、吹込みキヤリヤガ
ス又は浮上促進ガスが浴中を浮上して到達する該
浴の上面部分にスラグが存在しない状態で、かつ
減圧又は不活性ガス雰囲気を形成して、上記した
溶鋼中に吹込む。かくすることにより、撹拌によ
り浴面上のスラグを巻き込んで、新たな介在物を
生成する弊害が防止できる。 又、吹込んだ処理剤は、介在物吸収の後、スラ
グの下面と溶鋼上面の間に介在する。かくするこ
とにより、浴面上の酸化性スラグ層が、溶鋼中の
Al、Si等の無用の酸化に付与するスラグ−溶鋼
界面反応を遮断する。この作用により、浴面上の
スラグからの酸素供給(酸素侵入)の遮断が、従
来にみられない低原単位の処理剤で達成され、上
記した処理剤の介在物吸収効果は相殺要素がなく
なつて更に高まる。 以上の作用により、通常浴内にクラスター、非
球状介在物として存在するものは極めて少なくな
り、浮きやすい球状介在物のみとなる。この球状
介在物は鋳造までにほとんど製品に支障が生じな
いレベルにまで低減する。 本発明は、上記した介在物低減用処理剤の作用
を充分に活用したものである。次に、脱硫処理剤
吹込み前に介在物低減処理剤を吹込んだ場合と、
後に吹込んだ場合の両者の作用について詳細に説
明する。 脱硫処理剤を加える前に、CaF2濃度20重量%
以下のCaO−CaF2系介在物低減処理剤を加えた
場合には、CaF2濃度20重量%以下の介在物低減
処理剤の作用により、脱硫処理剤吹込み前の浴内
のAl2O3等介在物量を低減することができる。こ
のため、脱硫処理剤を吹込んだ際に起こる脱硫反
応の阻害要因になる処理剤へのAl2O3等の介在物
の吸収が軽減されるため、脱硫処理剤の精練効果
を助長する。 加えて、融点の高い低CaF2濃度の処理剤を吹
込み、スラグの下面と溶鋼上面の間にあらかじめ
介在させることによつて、CaF2濃度の高い処理
剤が浴面上のスラグ下面に堆積してもスラグの融
点低下を防止することができる。この作用によ
り、融点の低い高CaF2濃度の処理剤を大量に吹
込んだ際にも、スラグから溶鋼への酸素の浸入を
軽減できる。 一方、脱硫処理剤を加えた後、CaF2濃度20重
量%以下のCaO−CaF2系介在物低減処理剤を加
えることにより高CaF2濃度の脱硫処理剤のみで
は吸収しきれない浴内のAl2O3系介在物を、第2
図に示したような介在物低減処理剤の効果によ
り、ほぼ皆無にすることができる。又、脱硫処理
剤により融点が低下し、溶融したスラグの下面に
高融点である低CaF2濃度の介在物低減処理剤を
介在せしめることができる。したがつて、脱硫処
理剤のみを加えた場合に起こる鋳造段階での注入
流の渦によつてスラグの巻き込みを軽減すること
ができるため、新たな介在物の生成を抑制でき
る。 以上に説明した作用により、本発明は優れた脱
硫効果、および介在物低減効果をもたらし、かつ
脱硫時の耐火物の溶損も軽減できるのである。 上記したように、本発明で用いるCaF2が20重
量%以下のCaO−CaF2系介在物低減処理剤の作
用は、実質的に浮上分離しにくい介在物を球形
化、あるいは低密度で溶鋼と濡れにくいものと
し、浴内からの浮上分離を促進することにある。
この作用は、処理剤を吹込んだ後、浴面上のスラ
グの実質的に巻入まないようにしつつ、不活性ガ
スを溶鋼に吹込むことによつて、更に有効に働
く。 すなわち、本発明者等が検討を重ねた結果、浴
面上のスラグを実質的に巻込まないような条件下
で不活性ガスを溶鋼に吹込むと、介在物の中で特
に、球状介在物の低減効果が著しいことを見出し
た。これは、不活性ガスの吹込み時の強撹拌によ
る球状介在物の凝集合体の促進、および低融点の
球状介在物の表面および内部に吹込んだガスが付
着することによる介在物の見掛け密度の低減等の
作用により、球状介在物の浮上が促進されるため
である。 この不活性ガス吹込みの作用は、Al2O3クラス
ターに対しては小さい。したがつて、球状、
Al2O3クラスター等全ての介在物を低減するため
にはCaF2濃度が20重量%以下のCaO−CaF2系介
在物低減処理剤を脱硫処理剤の前、および又は後
に吹込み、Al2O3クラスターを処理剤に吸収せし
め、介在物の球状化を図つた後に、不活性ガス吹
込みを実施することが必要である。あるいは、脱
硫処理剤のみを吹込んだ後に上記不活性ガス吹込
みを行つても良い。この場合には、高CaF2濃度
の脱硫処理剤に吸収しきれない非球状、Al2O3
ラスター介在物は残存するが、球状介在物は上記
した不活性ガス吹込みの作用で低減する。 又、不活性ガスの吹込みによる球状介在物の低
減効果は、浴面上のスラグを実質的に巻込まない
条件下で初めて得られるのである。例えば、第8
図に示すような浴面上のスラグを撹拌する反応容
器では、浴面上のスラグを巻込み、逆に浴内の介
在物量が増加するため、本発明のような効果を得
ることが難しい。 更に、本発明における溶鋼の反応槽(循環路)
としては、減圧槽又は不活性ガス雰囲気槽を用い
る。これによつて大気から溶鋼への酸素侵入を防
止できるので、介在物低減に効果的である。ま
た、同時に脱ガスおよび脱炭反応が進行するた
め、窒素、水素、炭素等の濃度も低減するので好
ましい。 なお、上記処理剤をMgOを含まない耐火物を
ライニングした反応槽に採用しても、同様の脱
硫、介在物低減効果が得られる。 加えて、処理剤はCaO、CaF2、MgO等の混合
品、焼結品、プリメルト品いずれもが使用でき
る。 実施例 次に本発明各実施例を第1表〜第10表及び第3
図イ,ロ、第4図〜第7図と共に詳細に説明す
る。 第1表には、本発明の主構成である脱硫処理パ
ターンのみの具体例A〜Dとその比較例E〜Kを
示す。 第4表には、本発明の全体構成例として、 介在物低減−脱硫 介在物低減−脱硫−不活性ガスのみ吹込み 脱硫−介在物低減 脱硫−介在物低減−不活性ガスのみ吹込み の各処理パターンにおける処理剤と吹込条件の実
施例CA〜CDを示す。 第7表には本発明の他の全体構成例として、 介在物低減−脱硫−介在物低減 介在物低減−脱硫−介在物低減−不活性ガス
のみ吹込み の処理パターンにおける処理剤と吹込条件の実施
AA、ABを示す。 第9表には、本発明の主構成と他の処理との組
合せた例として、 脱硫−不活性ガスのみ吹込み の処理パターンにおける処理剤と吹込条件の具体
例BB、BCを示す。 第1表において、各具体例A〜Dには、第3図
イ,ロに示す取鍋1、反応槽(循環路)2、吹込
管3、溶鋼7、スラグ8から成る、処理設備を用
いた。第3図イの反応槽2は、減圧脱ガス槽で、
第3図ロの反応槽2は、溶鋼内を浮上した不活性
ガスを介して大気と連通した槽であるが、反応槽
2の浴上面は充分不活性ガス雰囲気に保たれてお
り、且つスラグは実質的に存在していない。 なお図中6は導管、5は出鋼口である。 また、比較例E〜Jには第3図イ,ロ設備を用
い、かつ且体例A〜Dと同じ処理剤吹込条件下で
処理を行つた。比較例のE、F、およびGの処理
剤には、不可避的にAgOが2重量%以下含まれ
ていた。さらに、比較例E、F、G、H、I、お
よびJとは別に、第3図イの設備を用い、処理剤
を全く吹込まずに脱ガスのみを行つた場合の従来
例をKとした。反応槽の耐火物材質は、MgOが
74重量%含まれたMgO−Cr2O3系であり、他に
SiO2、Al2O3が不可避的に含まれる。この耐火物
は、一般に溶鋼処理設備の反応槽に使用されるも
のである。 具前例のA、B、C、およびD、比較例のE、
F、G、J、およびKでは、耐火物溶損量を測定
するため、処理数を100とした。用いた溶鋼の成
分は、C:0.08〜0.1重量%、Si:0.18〜0.22重量
%、Mn:0.9〜1.2重量%、Al:0.02〜0.05重量%
であり、処理前後共に、この範囲内で推移した。 処理剤原単位を各々2.5〜3.0Kg/ton溶鋼とし
た場合における本実施例と比較例の処理前後の溶
鋼S濃度、および脱硫率の結果の1例を第2表に
示した。また、具体例A〜Dと比較例のE、F、
G、J、および従来例のKにおいて、100回処理
した後に、反応槽内浴面近傍にて測定した1処理
当りの耐火物の最大溶損量を第3表に示した。 第2表から明らかなように、具体例のA、B、
C、およびDでは、処理剤原単位2.5〜3.0Kg/
ton溶鋼でいずれも脱硫率60%以上、到達溶鋼S
濃度12ppm以下が得られた。特に、重量比で
{CaF2/(CaO+CaF2)}×100≧40%以上とした
具体例のB、CおよびDでは、脱硫率38%以上、
到達S濃度3〜5ppmの極限硫鋼が得られた。加
えて、第3表に示すように、具体例のA、B、
C、およびDについては、1処理当りの真空反応
槽内耐火物の溶損量がいずれも0.4〜0.7mmであ
り、処理剤を吹込まない従来例のKと同程度の結
果が得られた。 一方第2表に示すように、比較例のE、F、お
よびGでは、脱硫率、到達S濃度共に具体例とほ
ぼ同じ結果となつた。しかしながら、第3表から
明らかなように、比較例のE、F、G、およびJ
では1処理当りの耐火物溶損量が1.1mm以上とな
つており、処理剤を添加しなかつた従来例のKと
比べ、反応槽の耐火物寿命が1/2以下に短縮する
結果となつた。さらに、第2表に示すように、比
較例のH、IおよびJと従来例のKでは脱硫率は
55%以下であつた、特に比較例のHおよびJと、
処理剤を添加しなかつた従来例のKでは、脱硫率
が高々10%であり、処理後のS濃度は27〜30ppm
に達した程度に留まつた。 以上説明した具体例A〜Dは溶損が最も激しい
MgO74重量%含有耐火物をライニングした反応
槽を用いた例であるが、本発明者等はこの他、
MgO含有量が30重量%と55重量%の耐火物をラ
イニングした反応槽を用いて本例と同様に処理を
行なつたが、本発明例の脱硫率は60%を超え、反
応槽のライニングの摩耗は1処理当り0.3mm以下
と良好な結果を示した。 次に第4表に示す本発明の全体構成の実施例に
ついて説明する。 実施例CA、およびCBでは、介在物低減を目的
として(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+(%CaF2)}×
100=8、および14%であるCaO−CaF2系処理剤
を吹込む処理を処理で実施した後、続く処理
で脱硫を目的として(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+
(%CaF2)}×100=45、および51%、MgOを10〜
20重量%を含むCaO−CaF2−MgO系処理剤の吹
込を行つた。 又、実施例のCC、およびCDでは、処理で
(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+(%CaF2)}×100=45、
および50%、MgOを10〜20重量%を含むCaO−
CaF2−MgO系処理剤を吹込んで脱硫処理を行つ
た後、続く処理で介在物低減を目的として、
(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+(%CaF2)}×100=8、
および14%であるCaO−CaF2系処理剤を吹込む
処理を行つた。 更に、実施例のCB、およびCDでは、処理、
の終了後、吹込管3より流量1800Nl/分でAr
ガスを5分間吹込む処理を行つた。 上記各実施例における処理から処理の間に
おける処理剤組成の変更は、別ホツパーに受け入
れたCaO、CaF2およびMgOを、処理の経時的変
化に応じて変化する所要配合比率に応じて各々の
ホツパーから切出して、CaOとCaF2の配合比を
連続的に変化させて行つた。 又実施例CA、CB、CC、CDで用いた溶鋼の成
分は、具体例A〜Dの場合と同様に、C:0.08〜
0.1重量%、Si:0.18〜0.22重量%、Mn:0.9〜1.2
重量%、Al:0.02〜0.05重量%であり、処理前後
共にこの範囲内で推移した。又、循環路2の耐火
物材質は、具体例A〜Dで用いたものと同様に、
MgOが74重量%含まれたMgO−Cr2O3系であり、
他成分としてSiO2、Al2O3が不可避的に含まれ
る。 実施例のCA、CB、CCおよびCDの処理前後の
溶鋼〔S〕濃度、脱硫率、および全酸素濃度の1
例を第5表に示す。又、処理後の25μm径以上の
介在物検出頻度を球状と非球状、およびAl2O3
ラスターに分類して第5図に示す。第5表、第5
図には、具体例BおよびC、比較例のFおよびG
の結果の1例を併せて示した。なお、介在物検出
頻度とは、比較例Gの全介在物個数を10とした場
合の相対値である。 第5表から明らかなように、脱硫処理剤吹込み
前に介在物低減処理剤を吹込んだ実施例のCA、
およびCDは具体例B、Cおよび比較例F、Gの
いずれよりも処理後の溶鋼〔S〕濃度が低減し、
脱硫率が高くなつた。更に、第5表および第5図
から明らかなように、実施例CA、CB、CC、お
よびCDにおける処理後の全酸素量および介在物
検出頻度はいずれも具体例B、C、FおよびGに
比べて低減した。特に、脱硫処理剤吹込み後に介
在物低減処理剤を吹込んだ実施例のCCおよびCD
では、処理後の25μm以上のAl2O3クラスター検
出頻度がゼロとなり、著しいAl2O3系介在物低減
効果を示した。又、処理剤吹込み後にArガスを
浴内に吹込んだCB、およびCDはでは、全介在物
検出物検出頻度が低減した。 次に、実施例CA、CB、CCおよびCDの処理を
各々50回処理した後に、循環路内浴面近傍にて測
定した1処理当りの耐火物の最大溶損量を第6表
に示した。いずれの場合も第3表に示す比較例の
E、F、G、およびJに比べて低減し、高CaF2
濃度の処理剤を吹込む場合に問題となる反応槽耐
火物の溶損が軽減した。 なお、第4図の設備は、MgO用ホツパー58、
CaF2用ホツパー50、CaO用ホツパー51、溶
鋼サンプリング分析装置52、処理パターン設定
器53、処理剤切出フイーダー54,55,5
9、サンプリング分析装置52の信号を入力し、
設定器53の、設定処理パターンと時々刻々対比
しつつ、CaF2、CaO、MgOの所要配合比と添加
タイミングを等出し、これにホツパー50,5
1,58から吹込管3への処理剤搬送時間を差し
引いてフイーダー54,55,59に切出し指令
を発する演算指令装置58からなつている。 次に第7表に示す実施例について説明する。第
7表の実施例は実施例CA〜CDと同様、第4図に
示す装置を用いる。実施例AAおよびABでは、
脱硫処理剤吹込み前後にCaF2が20重量%以下の
処理剤を吹込み、実施例ABでは、全部の処理剤
吹込み後、吹込管3より流量2000Nl/分でArガ
スのみを5分間吹込む処理を行つた。 第7表に示す実施例AA、ABにおける処理
前半から後半、および処理から処理の間にお
ける処理剤組成の変更は、実施例CA〜CDと同
様、別ホツパーに受け入れたCaF2とCaOを、処
理の経時変化に応じて変化する所要配合比率に応
じて各々のホツパーから切出して、CaOとCaF2
の配合比を連続的に変化させて行つた。又、処理
剤中には、不可避的成分として、Al2O30.42重量
%、SiO23.04重量%、およびMgO0.43重量%が含
まれていた。 なお、実施例AA、ABはいずれの場合も脱酸
した後、処理の各処理を開始した。用いた溶鋼
の成分は、〔C〕:0.08〜0.15重量%、〔Si〕:0.15
〜0.23重量%、〔Mn〕:0.92〜1.30重量%、〔Al〕:
0.02〜0.05重量%であり、処理前後共に、溶鋼成
分はこの範囲内で推移した。 実施例AA、ABの処理前後の溶鋼〔S〕濃度、
および全酸素量を第8表に併せて示す。また処理
後の介在物検出頻度を第6図に示す。 実施例AA、ABでは、第8表から明らかなよ
うに、処理後の溶鋼〔S〕濃度が2ppm、かつ全
酸素量が7〜9ppmに低減し、極低硫高清浄度鋼
が得られた。加えて、第6図に示すように、介在
物検出頻度が極めて低くなつた。特に実施例の
ABでは、介在物検出頻度が1以下と著しい効果
が得られた。 なお、実施例のAA、ABではいずれの場合も
非球状、Al2O3クラスターが検出されなかつた。 以上に述べた実施例のAAおよびABにおいて
は、第4図に示した反応槽(循環路)2のライニ
ングとしてMgO含有量が55重量%なるMgO−
CrO3系耐火物を用いた。この場合の反応槽のラ
イニングの摩耗は、1処理当り0.6mm以下であり、
前述した比較例E〜Jに比べ良好な結果を示し
た。 次に第9表に示す実施例について説明する。実
施例BB、BCは、具体例A〜Dと同様、第3図イ
に示す装置を用い、脱硫処理剤のみを吹込んだ
後、浴面上のスラグを実質的に撹拌又は流動させ
ることなく、不活性なガスで溶鋼を撹拌した場合
を示す。 実施例のBBおよびBCは、実施例BおよびCと
同様の処理条件で脱硫処理剤を吹込んだ後、吹込
管3より2500Nl/分の流量でArガスを4分間吹
込んだ。 実施例のBBおよびBCの処理前後における溶鋼
〔S〕濃度、脱硫率、全酸素量を第10表に、処理
後の全介在物検出頻度を第7図に示す。 実施例BB、BCにおける脱硫率は第2表、第5
表に示した具体例BおよびCとほぼ同等である
が、処理後の全酸素量は具体例BおよびCに比べ
て低減した。又、第7図および第5図より明らか
なように、実施例のBBおよびBCでは、具体例B
およびCに比べて介在物検出頻度が小さくなつ
た。特に、実施例BBおよびBCにおける球形介在
物の低減効果が著しいが、Al2O3クラスターにつ
いては具体例BおよびCとほぼ同等であつた。 更に、実施例のBBおよびBCにおいては、具体
例A〜Dと同様、反応槽(循環路)2の耐火物材
質をMiOが74重量%含まれたMgO−Cr2O3系と
した。実施例BBおよびBCの処理を各々50回処理
した後に、反応槽内浴面近傍にて測定した1処理
当りの耐火物の最大溶損量はいずれも0.7mm以下
であり、第3表に示した比較例のE〜Jに比べて
大幅に改善した。
Industrial Application Field The present invention provides a method for efficiently carrying out the desulfurization reaction while preventing erosion of the refractory when molten steel is desulfurized using a reaction tank lined with a basic refractory containing MgO. The present invention relates to a treatment method, and moreover, to a method for efficiently reducing inclusions in molten steel at the same time. Conventional technology Recently, research has focused on the hydrogen-induced cracking resistance of line pipe materials and the lamellar tear characteristics of marine structural materials.
Requirements regarding steel properties have become significantly more stringent. In order to meet these demands, it is essential to reduce the content of sulfur (hereinafter referred to as S) in molten steel as much as possible, and also to reduce the content of gas components such as nitrogen (hereinafter referred to as N) and hydrogen (hereinafter referred to as H). ), the amount of oxide inclusions must also be reduced. Molten iron desulfurization methods are broadly divided into molten iron desulfurization methods performed at the hot metal stage and molten steel desulfurization methods performed at the molten steel stage. It is necessary to combine the processing of both hot metal and molten steel. Conventionally, a well-known molten steel desulfurization method is an injection method in which a CaO-based composite mixture or a Ca alloy is injected into molten steel in a ladle together with a carrier gas. This method is characterized by desulfurization by a strong slag-metal reaction formed by strong stirring by injection. However, in desulfurization treatment that mainly involves a slag-metal reaction under strong stirring like this method,
During the treatment, there are problems such as rephosphorization from the dephosphorization slag, a decrease in the yield of addition of alloys such as Al, and a relatively large temperature drop. In addition, due to the turbulence on the molten steel surface caused by strong stirring, absorption of gaseous components - especially H, N, etc. - from the atmosphere and slag into the molten steel is unavoidable. In order to produce steel types that require simultaneous reduction of N and N, further degassing processes such as RH or DH are required. An increase in the amount of molten steel processed is unavoidable, such as the need for superheating, and furthermore, quality is often adversely affected. As a means to solve these problems, a treatment method has recently been developed in which a desulfurizing agent is blown into the molten steel together with a carrier gas while the molten steel is being lifted vertically into an empty tank, thereby simultaneously degassing and desulfurizing the molten steel. Among them, like JP-A-60-59011,
In a desulfurization method in which the desulfurization agent is added to complete the main desulfurization reaction in the bath without substantially stirring or fluidizing the slag on the bath surface, at least a weight concentration of at least % by weight with good slag property is added. , preferably 40%
By using a treatment agent that contains CaF 2 and the remainder is CaO as a main component, it has extremely low sulfur and [N],
Molten steel with low [O] and [H] contents has been obtained with a low processing agent consumption rate. However, as a result of further research by the present inventors, it was found that the method of JP-A-60-59011 has the following problems. Problems to be Solved by the Invention (i) The processing agent used in JP-A-60-59011 has a high desulfurization ability. However, since the concentration of CaF2 contained in the treatment agent is as high as 20% by weight or more,
Basic refractories containing MgO that are generally used as reaction vessels for molten steel, such as magnesia, magnesia carbon, magnesia chrome,
Promotes erosion of refractories made of dolomite, spinel, etc. alone or in combination. Therefore, when the frequency of melting ultra-low sulfur steel increases, the life of the reaction tank is shortened and the cost of refractories increases. (ii) When the desulfurization method of JP-A-60-59011 is applied to molten steel with a relatively large amount of inclusions, the treatment agent blown into the bath and the oxide-based inclusions in the bath aggregate and coalesce, Inclusion components such as Al 2 O 3 are absorbed into the processing agent. This reduces the desulfurization ability of the treatment agent, so
When obtaining ultra-low sulfur steel with [S]≦5ppm, the injection unit consumption of a treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration becomes high. Therefore, as described above, the life of the reaction tank is shortened and the cost of refractories is increased. Furthermore, since this method does not substantially stir or flow the slag on the bath surface, it has the advantage of suppressing the entrainment of ladle slag and the atmosphere. however,
When a large amount of a treatment agent with a low melting point and a high CaF 2 concentration is injected to melt ultra-low sulfur steel, the treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration accumulates on the underside of the ladle slag, causing slag. The melting point of the slag drops significantly, and the top surface of the slag becomes molten. In such a case, the movement of oxygen in all the slag becomes easy, and therefore oxygen easily enters the molten steel from the slag. In addition, such molten slag is likely to be drawn into the bath by the vortices generated by the injection flow into the mold or tundish during the subsequent casting step, and can become new inclusions. Therefore, in order to efficiently perform both desulfurization and inclusion reduction,
It became necessary to develop a new method. Means for Solving the Problems The present invention solves the problems in the conventional molten steel deflow treatment described above, does not impair the [S] reduction ability of the treatment agent, and has a basic composition mainly composed of MgO. By preventing corrosion of the chemically resistant materials as much as possible,
The following means are used to economically and efficiently desulfurize molten steel. In other words, (1) When desulfurizing molten steel is performed in a reaction tank lined with a basic refractory containing MgO, the carrier gas blown into the bath floats in the bath and reaches the upper surface of the bath by reducing the pressure or It is maintained in an inert gas atmosphere and substantially free of slag, and is made of CaO, CaF 2 , MgO, and other unavoidable components, using an inert gas as a carrier gas, with MgO being 10 to 60% by weight. ,
Weight ratio {CaF 2 / (CaO + CaF 2 )} x 100 = 20~
A first treatment agent consisting of 80% is blown into the bath, and before and/or after blown into the bath, a first treatment agent consisting of CaF 2 and CaO as the main components and the remainder consisting of unavoidable components, and from the above CaF 2 and CaO in the main component
A second treatment agent having a CaF 2 concentration of 20% by weight or less,
A method for producing molten steel characterized by injecting an inert gas into the bath as a carrier gas, and (2) injecting it into the bath when desulfurizing molten steel in a reaction tank lined with a basic refractory containing MgO. The upper surface of the bath, where the carrier gas floats up and reaches the bath, is maintained at reduced pressure or in an inert gas atmosphere, and the inert gas is used as the carrier gas to maintain CaO, CaF 2 , and
Consisting of MgO and other unavoidable components, MgO
10 to 60% by weight, weight ratio {CaF 2 /(CaO+
A first treatment agent consisting of 20% to 80% CaF 2 A second treatment agent having a CaF 2 concentration of 20% by weight or less in the main components consisting of CaF 2 and CaO is blown into the bath using an inert gas as a carrier gas, and then the slag on the bath surface is blown into the bath. This is a method for treating molten steel, characterized in that an inert gas is blown into the molten steel without substantially stirring or flowing the molten steel. In the processing agent used in the present invention, impurities that are usually unavoidably contained include Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2
etc., and the content of each is 3% or less in terms of weight concentration. Effect The present invention uses CaO, CaF 2 ,
Consists of MgO and other unavoidable components,
MgO is 10-60% by weight, weight ratio is {CaF 2 /(CaO
+CaF 2 )}×100=20 to 80% of the desulfurization treatment agent is used. As a result, even if the desulfurization treatment agent is added to the molten steel that does not form slag on the bath surface melted in the MgO refractory container, approximately 60% of the slag is removed as shown in Figure 1A. High desulfurization rate can be obtained.
When the weight concentration of MgO is up to 60%, the desulfurization rate is only slightly lower than that without MgO. Moreover, in this range of MgO content, the deflow rate shown in JP-A-60-59011 is
CaF2 concentration dependence is not impaired. That is, in the range of {CaF 2 /(CaO+CaF 2 )}×100≧40% in terms of weight ratio, a high desulfurization rate of 70% or more is shown when MgO is 60% by weight or less. Furthermore, MgO-Cr 2 O 3 -based refractory rods (10 mm diameter) were added to the treatment agent at a weight ratio of {CaF 2 / (CaO + CaF 2 )} x 100 = 20 to 80% while maintaining various MgO concentrations.
Figure 1(b) shows the maximum amount of erosion when soaked for 10 minutes. In the range of {CaF 2 /(CaO+CaF 2 )}×100=20 to 80%, if the weight concentration of MgO is 10% or more, the amount of erosion of the refractory becomes extremely small. In addition, in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 3, the carrier gas blown into the bath floats in the bath and reaches the upper surface of the bath, which is maintained at reduced pressure or in an inert gas atmosphere, and the slag is The above-mentioned desulfurization treatment agent is blown into the bath without being substantially present. Unlike the conventional stirring vessel for desulfurization shown in Fig. 8, this makes it possible to carry out the desulfurization reaction in an environment or atmosphere that is less affected by the slag on the top surface of the molten steel in the ladle, that is, in the molten steel bath. This eliminates the need for the strong direct reaction between molten steel, slag on the upper surface of the ladle, and slag-metal as in the conventional method, and this substantially eliminates rephosphorization during processing and rephosphorization of the processing ratio caused by slag flow and stirring. Not only is there no need for slag removal or slag reforming before treatment, which is carried out in conventional molten steel deflow methods, it is possible to significantly reduce treatment costs. In addition, since the desulfurization of the present invention completes the main reaction in molten steel, the desulfurization of the present invention is highly efficient and reduces the basic unit of the desulfurization treatment agent, which is a concern due to the use of large amounts of CaF 2. In addition, there is no flow of the slag line, and as a result, it is reduced to the point that it is not a substantial problem. In addition, there is no need to use a basic ladle to promote desulfurization ability, and the cost of refractory materials for the ladle is greatly reduced. In order to stir and react in an environment where the molten steel is not easily affected by the slag on the upper surface of the molten steel in the ladle, as shown in FIG. Deterioration of cleanliness is less likely to occur. However, as in the case of ultra-low sulfur steel melting, where the basic unit of desulfurization treatment agent is high,
As a large amount of the desulfurization treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration accumulates on the bottom surface of the slag above the bath surface, the melting point of the slag drops significantly, and when it melts to the top surface of the slag, as mentioned above, the entire slag Since the movement of oxygen in the slag becomes easier, oxygen easily enters the molten steel from the slag. In addition, such molten slag is likely to be drawn into the bath by the vortex generated by the injection flow into the mold or tundish in the subsequent casting step, and may become new inclusions. In addition, as mentioned above, when desulfurizing molten steel with relatively many inclusions, inclusions such as Al 2 O 3 aggregate in the desulfurization treatment agent blown into the bath, reducing the desulfurization ability of the desulfurization treatment agent. This results in a negative effect of a decrease in performance. In order to solve the above-mentioned various problems and to perform highly efficient desulfurization to the extremely low sulfur range while maintaining molten steel at a high level of cleanliness, the present invention uses the second treatment agent, i.e.
The main component is CaO−CaF 2 , and the CaF 2 concentration is expressed in weight% (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) + (%CaF 2 )}≦0.2
The process of injecting a treatment agent for reducing inclusions into the molten steel is carried out before and/or after the injection of the desulfurization treatment agent. By doing so, the amount of inclusions in the molten steel before and/or after the desulfurization treatment agent is injected can be efficiently reduced. In other words, Figure 2 shows the effect of the ratio of CaO and CaF 2 in the treatment agent on the amount of inclusions absorbed into the treatment agent when CaO-CaF 2 type treatment agent is injected into molten steel. An example of 2 O 3 inclusions will be shown. CaO−
For CaF 2 -based treatment agents, (%CaF 2 )/{(%
By setting CaO)+(% CaF2 )}≦0.2, the amount of Al2O3 - based inclusions absorbed into the processing agent can be extremely increased. In this way, once inclusions are absorbed by the treatment agent for inclusion reduction, they are formed into clusters that are difficult to float, and high melting point particles that exist in a non-spherical shape even in a static bath.
The Al 2 O 3 -based inclusions become molten and float to the surface as spherical inclusions that are easily observed in a static bath. In addition, FeO and FeO present in molten steel before Al deoxidation
-MnO-based inclusions and SiO 2 -MnO-based inclusions, which have a low melting point and are observed in a spherical shape in a static bath, but have a high specific gravity and are difficult to float, have a low specific gravity. It aggregates with the treatment agent for inclusion reduction, reduces the specific gravity of inclusions, and promotes flotation. In the present invention, when the above-mentioned treatment agent is blown into the bath, the bath (molten steel) is stirred or fluidized without substantially entraining the slag on the bath surface into the bath.
By using a reduced pressure tank or an inert gas atmosphere tank in the circulation path of the reaction tank as shown in Figure 3, there is no slag on the upper surface of the bath where the blown carrier gas or floatation promoting gas floats in the bath and reaches it. The molten steel is blown into the above-mentioned molten steel under reduced pressure or an inert gas atmosphere. By doing so, it is possible to prevent the harmful effect of stirring the slag on the bath surface and generating new inclusions. Further, the injected treatment agent is interposed between the lower surface of the slag and the upper surface of the molten steel after the inclusions are absorbed. By doing this, the oxidizing slag layer on the bath surface is absorbed by the molten steel.
Blocks the slag-molten steel interface reaction that causes unnecessary oxidation of Al, Si, etc. Due to this action, the blocking of oxygen supply (oxygen intrusion) from the slag on the bath surface is achieved with a treatment agent that has an unprecedentedly low unit consumption, and the above-mentioned inclusion absorption effect of the treatment agent is achieved without any countervailing factors. It grows even higher. Due to the above-mentioned effects, the amount of clusters and non-spherical inclusions that normally exist in the bath becomes extremely small, leaving only spherical inclusions that float easily. These spherical inclusions are reduced to a level that hardly causes any trouble to the product by the time of casting. The present invention fully utilizes the effect of the treatment agent for reducing inclusions described above. Next, the case where the inclusion reduction treatment agent is injected before the desulfurization treatment agent is injected,
The effects of both when injected later will be explained in detail. CaF2 concentration 20% by weight before adding desulfurization treatment agent
When the following CaO-CaF 2- based inclusion reduction treatment agent is added, the action of the inclusion reduction treatment agent with a CaF 2 concentration of 20% by weight or less will reduce Al 2 O 3 in the bath before the desulfurization treatment agent is blown. The amount of inclusions can be reduced. Therefore, the absorption of inclusions such as Al 2 O 3 into the treatment agent, which is a factor that inhibits the desulfurization reaction that occurs when the desulfurization treatment agent is blown into the treatment agent, is reduced, thereby promoting the scouring effect of the desulfurization treatment agent. In addition, by injecting a treatment agent with a high melting point and a low CaF 2 concentration and interposing it between the bottom surface of the slag and the top surface of the molten steel, the treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration is deposited on the bottom surface of the slag on the bath surface. It is possible to prevent the melting point of the slag from lowering. This effect makes it possible to reduce the infiltration of oxygen from the slag into the molten steel even when a large amount of a treatment agent with a low melting point and high CaF 2 concentration is injected. On the other hand, after adding the desulfurization treatment agent, by adding a CaO-CaF 2 inclusion reduction treatment agent with a CaF 2 concentration of 20% by weight or less, Al in the bath that cannot be absorbed by the desulfurization treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration alone can be removed. 2 O 3 inclusions are removed from the second
Due to the effect of the treatment agent for reducing inclusions as shown in the figure, they can be almost completely eliminated. Further, the melting point is lowered by the desulfurization treatment agent, and an inclusion reduction treatment agent having a high melting point and a low CaF 2 concentration can be interposed on the lower surface of the molten slag. Therefore, it is possible to reduce the entrainment of slag due to the swirling of the injection flow during the casting stage that occurs when only the desulfurization treatment agent is added, and therefore the generation of new inclusions can be suppressed. Due to the effects described above, the present invention provides excellent desulfurization effects and inclusion reduction effects, and can also reduce melting loss of refractories during desulfurization. As mentioned above, the effect of the CaO-CaF 2 inclusion reduction treatment agent containing 20% by weight or less of CaF 2 used in the present invention is to make inclusions that are difficult to float and separate into spheroids, or to reduce the density of inclusions into molten steel. The purpose is to make it difficult to get wet and to promote flotation and separation from the bath.
This effect works more effectively by blowing an inert gas into the molten steel after blowing in the treatment agent while substantially preventing the slag on the bath surface from being entrained. In other words, as a result of repeated studies by the present inventors, it has been found that when inert gas is blown into molten steel under conditions that do not substantially entrain slag on the bath surface, spherical inclusions, in particular, It was found that the reduction effect was remarkable. This is due to the promotion of agglomeration of spherical inclusions due to strong stirring when inert gas is blown in, and the fact that the apparent density of inclusions is reduced due to the adhesion of the blown gas to the surface and inside of spherical inclusions with a low melting point. This is because the levitation of the spherical inclusions is promoted by the reduction and other effects. The effect of this inert gas injection is small on Al 2 O 3 clusters. Therefore, spherical,
In order to reduce all inclusions such as Al 2 O 3 clusters, a CaO-CaF 2 inclusion reduction treatment agent with a CaF 2 concentration of 20% by weight or less is injected before and/or after the desulfurization treatment agent, and Al 2 After the O 3 clusters are absorbed into the treatment agent and the inclusions are spheroidized, it is necessary to carry out inert gas blowing. Alternatively, the inert gas may be injected after only the desulfurization treatment agent is injected. In this case, non-spherical Al 2 O 3 cluster inclusions that cannot be absorbed by the desulfurization treatment agent with a high CaF 2 concentration remain, but the spherical inclusions are reduced by the effect of the inert gas blowing described above. Furthermore, the effect of reducing spherical inclusions by blowing inert gas can only be obtained under conditions where slag on the bath surface is not substantially entrained. For example, the 8th
In a reaction vessel as shown in the figure in which the slag on the bath surface is stirred, the slag on the bath surface is dragged in and the amount of inclusions in the bath increases, so it is difficult to obtain the effects of the present invention. Furthermore, a reaction tank (circulation path) for molten steel in the present invention
For this purpose, a reduced pressure tank or an inert gas atmosphere tank is used. This prevents oxygen from entering the molten steel from the atmosphere, which is effective in reducing inclusions. Further, since degassing and decarburization reactions proceed simultaneously, the concentrations of nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon, etc. are also reduced, which is preferable. Note that similar desulfurization and inclusion reduction effects can be obtained even if the above treatment agent is used in a reaction tank lined with a refractory that does not contain MgO. In addition, the processing agent may be a mixture of CaO, CaF 2 , MgO, etc., a sintered product, or a pre-melt product. Examples Next, examples of the present invention are shown in Tables 1 to 10 and Table 3.
This will be explained in detail with reference to Figures A and B and Figures 4 to 7. Table 1 shows specific examples A to D of only the desulfurization treatment pattern, which is the main component of the present invention, and comparative examples E to K thereof. Table 4 shows examples of the overall configuration of the present invention, including: Reduction of inclusions - Desulfurization Reduction of inclusions - Desulfurization - Injection of inert gas only Desulfurization - Reduction of inclusions Desulfurization - Reduction of inclusions - Injection of inert gas only Examples CA to CD of processing agents and blowing conditions in processing patterns are shown. Table 7 shows other overall configuration examples of the present invention, including treatment agents and blowing conditions in the treatment pattern: inclusion reduction - desulfurization - inclusion reduction - inclusion reduction - desulfurization - inclusion reduction - inert gas only injection. implementation
Indicates AA, AB. Table 9 shows specific examples BB and BC of the treatment agent and blowing conditions in the treatment pattern of desulfurization and blowing only inert gas, as an example of a combination of the main structure of the present invention and other treatments. In Table 1, each specific example A to D uses processing equipment consisting of a ladle 1, a reaction tank (circulation path) 2, a blowing pipe 3, molten steel 7, and slag 8 shown in Figure 3 A and B. there was. The reaction tank 2 in Figure 3A is a vacuum degassing tank,
Reaction tank 2 in Figure 3B is a tank that communicates with the atmosphere through an inert gas floating in the molten steel, and the upper surface of the reaction tank 2 is kept in a sufficient inert gas atmosphere, and the slag is virtually non-existent. In the figure, 6 is a conduit, and 5 is a tapping port. Further, Comparative Examples E to J were treated using the equipment in Figures A and B and under the same treatment agent injection conditions as Examples A to D. The processing agents of Comparative Examples E, F, and G inevitably contained 2% by weight or less of AgO. Furthermore, in addition to Comparative Examples E, F, G, H, I, and J, K is a conventional example in which only degassing was performed without injecting any processing agent using the equipment shown in Figure 3 A. . The refractory material of the reaction tank is MgO.
It is a MgO−Cr 2 O 3 system containing 74% by weight, and other
SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 are inevitably included. This refractory is generally used in reaction vessels of molten steel processing equipment. Specific examples A, B, C, and D, Comparative example E,
For F, G, J, and K, the number of treatments was set to 100 in order to measure the amount of refractory erosion. The components of the molten steel used were: C: 0.08-0.1% by weight, Si: 0.18-0.22% by weight, Mn: 0.9-1.2% by weight, Al: 0.02-0.05% by weight.
, and remained within this range both before and after treatment. Table 2 shows an example of the results of the molten steel S concentration before and after treatment and the desulfurization rate of the present example and comparative example when the processing agent consumption rate was 2.5 to 3.0 kg/ton of molten steel. In addition, specific examples A to D and comparative examples E, F,
Table 3 shows the maximum amount of erosion of the refractory per treatment in G, J, and K of the conventional example, which were measured near the bath surface in the reaction tank after 100 treatments. As is clear from Table 2, specific examples A, B,
For C and D, the processing agent consumption rate is 2.5 to 3.0 kg/
ton of molten steel, desulfurization rate of 60% or more, reached molten steel S
A concentration of 12 ppm or less was obtained. In particular, in specific examples B, C, and D where the weight ratio is {CaF 2 / (CaO + CaF 2 )}×100≧40% or more, the desulfurization rate is 38% or more,
Extremely sulfurized steel with an ultimate S concentration of 3 to 5 ppm was obtained. In addition, as shown in Table 3, specific examples A, B,
For C and D, the amount of erosion of the refractory in the vacuum reaction tank per treatment was 0.4 to 0.7 mm, which was comparable to the conventional example K in which no treatment agent was injected. . On the other hand, as shown in Table 2, in Comparative Examples E, F, and G, both the desulfurization rate and the achieved S concentration were almost the same as the specific example. However, as is clear from Table 3, the comparative examples E, F, G, and J
In this case, the amount of refractory erosion per treatment was more than 1.1 mm, which resulted in the life of the refractory in the reaction tank being shortened to less than half compared to conventional K, which did not add a treatment agent. Ta. Furthermore, as shown in Table 2, the desulfurization rate is
Especially with comparative examples H and J, which were 55% or less,
In the conventional K without adding a treatment agent, the desulfurization rate is at most 10%, and the S concentration after treatment is 27 to 30 ppm.
It remained at that level. In the specific examples A to D explained above, the melting loss is the most severe.
This is an example using a reaction tank lined with a refractory containing 74% by weight of MgO, but the inventors have also
The same treatment as in this example was carried out using reaction vessels lined with refractories with MgO contents of 30% and 55% by weight, but the desulfurization rate of the inventive example exceeded 60%, and The wear rate was less than 0.3 mm per treatment, showing good results. Next, examples of the overall configuration of the present invention shown in Table 4 will be described. In Examples CA and CB, for the purpose of reducing inclusions, (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) + (%CaF 2 )}×
100=8 and 14% of CaO-CaF 2- based treatment agent is carried out in the treatment, and in the subsequent treatment, for the purpose of desulfurization, (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) +
(% CaF2 )}×100=45, and 51%, MgO from 10 to
A CaO-CaF 2 -MgO-based treatment agent containing 20% by weight was injected. In addition, in the CC and CD of the example, (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) + (%CaF 2 )}×100=45,
and 50% CaO− containing 10–20 wt% MgO
After performing desulfurization treatment by injecting CaF 2 −MgO-based treatment agent, in order to reduce inclusions in the subsequent treatment,
(%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) + (%CaF 2 )}×100=8,
and 14% CaO-CaF 2 type treatment agent was injected. Furthermore, in Examples CB and CD, processing,
After the completion of the process, Ar is supplied from the blowing pipe 3 at a flow rate of 1800Nl/min.
A treatment was performed in which gas was blown for 5 minutes. In each of the above examples, the composition of the processing agent was changed between treatments by changing the composition of CaO, CaF 2 and MgO received in separate hoppers into each hopper according to the required blending ratio that changes according to changes over time in the processing. The experiment was carried out by continuously changing the blending ratio of CaO and CaF 2 . The composition of the molten steel used in Examples CA, CB, CC, and CD is the same as in Examples A to D: C: 0.08 to
0.1% by weight, Si: 0.18-0.22% by weight, Mn: 0.9-1.2
% by weight, Al: 0.02 to 0.05% by weight, and remained within this range both before and after treatment. In addition, the refractory material of the circulation path 2 is the same as that used in specific examples A to D.
It is a MgO−Cr 2 O 3 system containing 74% by weight of MgO,
SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 are inevitably included as other components. Molten steel [S] concentration, desulfurization rate, and total oxygen concentration before and after treatment of CA, CB, CC, and CD in Examples
Examples are shown in Table 5. Furthermore, the frequency of detection of inclusions with a diameter of 25 μm or more after treatment is classified into spherical, non-spherical, and Al 2 O 3 clusters and is shown in FIG. Table 5, 5th
The figure shows specific examples B and C, comparative examples F and G.
An example of the results is also shown. Note that the inclusion detection frequency is a relative value when the total number of inclusions in Comparative Example G is set to 10. As is clear from Table 5, the CA of the example in which the inclusion reduction treatment agent was injected before the desulfurization treatment agent was injected,
and CD have a lower molten steel [S] concentration after treatment than both specific examples B and C and comparative examples F and G,
Desulfurization rate increased. Furthermore, as is clear from Table 5 and FIG. It was reduced in comparison. In particular, CC and CD of examples where the inclusion reduction treatment agent was injected after the desulfurization treatment agent was injected.
In this case, the frequency of detection of Al 2 O 3 clusters of 25 μm or more after treatment became zero, indicating a remarkable effect in reducing Al 2 O 3 -based inclusions. Furthermore, in CB and CD, in which Ar gas was blown into the bath after blowing the treatment agent, the frequency of detection of all inclusions was reduced. Next, after each of Examples CA, CB, CC, and CD was processed 50 times, the maximum amount of erosion of the refractory per treatment measured near the bath surface in the circulation path is shown in Table 6. . In all cases, the reduction was compared to the comparative examples E, F, G, and J shown in Table 3, and the high CaF2
Erosion of the reactor refractories, which is a problem when injecting a high concentration treatment agent, has been reduced. The equipment shown in Figure 4 includes MgO hopper 58,
Hopper 50 for CaF 2 , hopper 51 for CaO, molten steel sampling analyzer 52, processing pattern setting device 53, processing agent cutting feeder 54, 55, 5
9. Input the signal of the sampling analyzer 52,
The required blending ratio and addition timing of CaF 2 , CaO, and MgO are calculated by constantly comparing with the setting processing pattern of the setting device 53, and the hopper 50, 5
It consists of an arithmetic command device 58 which issues a cutting command to the feeders 54, 55, 59 by subtracting the processing agent conveyance time to the blowing pipe 3 from 1,58. Next, the examples shown in Table 7 will be explained. The examples shown in Table 7 use the apparatus shown in FIG. 4, similar to Examples CA to CD. In Examples AA and AB,
Before and after injecting the desulfurization treatment agent, a treatment agent with CaF 2 of 20% by weight or less is injected, and in Example AB, after injecting all the treatment agents, only Ar gas is blown at a flow rate of 2000 Nl/min from the blowing pipe 3 for 5 minutes. I did some processing to add it. The changes in the composition of the treatment agent from the first half to the second half of the treatment and between treatments in Examples AA and AB shown in Table 7 are similar to Examples CA to CD, in which CaF 2 and CaO received in separate hoppers were CaO and CaF 2 are cut out from each hopper according to the required blending ratio that changes over time.
The mixing ratio was continuously changed. The processing agent also contained 0.42% by weight of Al 2 O 3 , 3.04% by weight of SiO 2 , and 0.43% by weight of MgO as inevitable components. In addition, in both Examples AA and AB, each treatment was started after deoxidation. The composition of the molten steel used was [C]: 0.08 to 0.15% by weight, [Si]: 0.15
~0.23% by weight, [Mn]: 0.92-1.30% by weight, [Al]:
It was 0.02 to 0.05% by weight, and the molten steel composition remained within this range both before and after treatment. Molten steel [S] concentration before and after treatment of Examples AA and AB,
and the total oxygen amount are also shown in Table 8. Furthermore, the frequency of detection of inclusions after treatment is shown in FIG. As is clear from Table 8, in Examples AA and AB, the molten steel [S] concentration after treatment was reduced to 2 ppm and the total oxygen amount was reduced to 7 to 9 ppm, and ultra-low sulfur high cleanliness steel was obtained. . In addition, as shown in FIG. 6, the frequency of detection of inclusions became extremely low. Especially in the example
With AB, a remarkable effect was obtained with an inclusion detection frequency of 1 or less. In addition, in both AA and AB of Examples, non-spherical shapes and Al 2 O 3 clusters were not detected. In the examples AA and AB described above, the lining of the reaction tank (circulation path) 2 shown in FIG.
A CrO 3 -based refractory was used. In this case, the wear of the reaction tank lining is 0.6 mm or less per treatment,
It showed better results than the aforementioned Comparative Examples E to J. Next, the examples shown in Table 9 will be explained. Examples BB and BC, like Examples A to D, used the apparatus shown in Figure 3A, and after injecting only the desulfurization treatment agent, the slag on the bath surface was substantially not stirred or fluidized. , shows the case where molten steel is stirred with an inert gas. In Examples BB and BC, after a desulfurization treatment agent was blown in under the same treatment conditions as in Examples B and C, Ar gas was blown in from the blowing pipe 3 at a flow rate of 2500 Nl/min for 4 minutes. Table 10 shows the molten steel [S] concentration, desulfurization rate, and total oxygen amount before and after the BB and BC treatments in Examples, and FIG. 7 shows the total inclusion detection frequency after the treatments. The desulfurization rates in Examples BB and BC are shown in Table 2 and Table 5.
Although it is almost equivalent to Examples B and C shown in the table, the total amount of oxygen after treatment was reduced compared to Examples B and C. Moreover, as is clear from FIG. 7 and FIG. 5, in BB and BC of the example, specific example B
The frequency of detection of inclusions was lower than that of C and C. In particular, the effect of reducing spherical inclusions in Examples BB and BC was remarkable, but the Al 2 O 3 clusters were almost the same as in Examples B and C. Furthermore, in Examples BB and BC, similar to Specific Examples A to D, the refractory material of the reaction tank (circulation path) 2 was MgO-Cr 2 O 3 containing 74% by weight of MiO. After 50 treatments each of Examples BB and BC, the maximum amount of corrosion loss of the refractory per treatment measured near the bath surface in the reaction tank was 0.7 mm or less, and is shown in Table 3. It was significantly improved compared to Comparative Examples E to J.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 発明の効果 以上述べたように、本発明は、CaO、CaF2
およびMgOと、そのた不可避的成分から成り、
MgOが10〜90重量%、重量比で{CaF2/(CaO
+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%とする処理剤であるの
で、高濃度のCaF2を含むCaO−CaF2系処理剤の
優れた脱硫特性を損なうことなく、かつ高濃度の
CaF2を含む処理剤を用いた場合に問題となつた
MiOを含む耐火物製の反応槽の溶損を防止する
ことができる。 このため溶鋼を連続的に、かつ大量に脱硫処理
する場合には、耐火物コストの増大を有利に防止
し、反応槽の寿命を短縮することがないので、大
幅な製造コスト低減が得られる。 又、本発明は、上記処理剤を取鍋溶鋼上に存在
するスラグを実質的に撹拌することなく、浴中に
吹込み、溶鋼中で主要な脱硫反応を終了するた
め、従来のごとく強力なスラグ−メタル反応によ
る脱硫処理が不要になつて、少ない脱硫剤原単位
で、かつ短時間に極低硫鋼を得ることができる。
このため溶鋼の温度降下軽減、省資源、省エネル
ギー等の多大な効果が得られる。 加えて、本発明は、溶鋼表面に存在するスラグ
を浴中に巻込まず、更には溶鋼とスラグの界面反
応を避けるために、該浴中に吹込んだキヤリヤガ
ス又は浮上促進ガスが到達する該浴上面部に実質
的にスラグを存在せしめないで、介在物吸収性の
良い重量濃度で(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+(%
CaF2)}≦0.2のCaO−CaF2系介在物低減処理剤を
上記脱硫処理剤吹込みの前、および又は後に吹込
むので、脱硫と共に溶鋼中の介在物を製品用途に
おいて全く支障が生じない程度まで、迅速的確か
つ経済的に低減することが可能になる。又、脱硫
処理剤中への介在物の凝集による脱硫能の低下が
防止できるため、高効率の脱硫をも可能となる。 本発明では、上記した処理剤の全部を吹込み後
に、浴面上のスラグを実質的に巻込ませることな
く、不活性ガス吹込みを行うので、処理剤による
介在物吸収効果と併せて、介在物の凝集合体、浮
上促進効果を大幅に改善することができる。 更に、本発明の反応環境としては、RH又は
DH等の真空脱ガス槽、あるいは不活性ガス雰囲
気槽を用いるので、介在物低減と同時に脱ガスを
行うことが可能になる。これによつて、統合、併
用による工程省略が可能となりその結果、大巾な
製造コスト低減、製造歩留りの向上が得られる
等、本発明が工業上にもたらす効果は大きい。
[Table] Effects of the invention As described above, the present invention provides CaO, CaF 2 ,
and MgO and other unavoidable components,
MgO is 10 to 90% by weight, weight ratio is {CaF 2 /(CaO
+CaF 2 )} x 100 = 20 to 80%, so it does not impair the excellent desulfurization properties of CaO-CaF 2 -based treatment agents that contain high concentrations of CaF 2 , and
A problem occurred when using a treatment agent containing CaF2 .
It is possible to prevent erosion of a reaction tank made of a refractory material containing MiO. Therefore, when molten steel is desulfurized continuously and in large quantities, an increase in the cost of refractories is advantageously prevented and the life of the reaction tank is not shortened, resulting in a significant reduction in manufacturing costs. Furthermore, in the present invention, the treatment agent is blown into the bath without substantially stirring the slag present on the molten steel in the ladle, and the main desulfurization reaction is completed in the molten steel. Desulfurization treatment by slag-metal reaction is no longer necessary, and ultra-low sulfur steel can be obtained with a small unit of desulfurization agent and in a short time.
Therefore, great effects such as reducing the temperature drop of molten steel, saving resources, and saving energy can be obtained. In addition, the present invention provides a method for preventing slag existing on the surface of molten steel from being drawn into the bath, and furthermore, in order to avoid an interfacial reaction between molten steel and slag, the carrier gas or floatation promoting gas blown into the bath reaches the bath. The weight concentration is (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) + (%
CaF 2 )}≦0.2 CaO-CaF 2- based inclusion reduction treatment agent is injected before and/or after the above-mentioned desulfurization treatment agent injection, so that inclusions in molten steel along with desulfurization will not cause any problems in product use. to a certain extent, it becomes possible to reduce it rapidly, reliably and economically. Furthermore, since it is possible to prevent a decrease in desulfurization ability due to the agglomeration of inclusions in the desulfurization treatment agent, highly efficient desulfurization is also possible. In the present invention, after blowing in all of the above-mentioned treatment agents, inert gas is blown in without substantially entraining the slag on the bath surface. The effect of promoting agglomeration and floating of objects can be greatly improved. Furthermore, the reaction environment of the present invention is RH or
Since a vacuum degassing tank such as DH or an inert gas atmosphere tank is used, it is possible to perform degassing while reducing inclusions. This makes it possible to omit processes through integration and combination, and as a result, the present invention has great industrial effects, such as a significant reduction in manufacturing costs and an improvement in manufacturing yield.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図イは、本発明における脱硫率におよぼす
処理剤中のMgO濃度の影響を、(%CaF2)/
{(%CaO)+(%CaF2)}(重量比)別に示す図、
第1図ロは、本発明におけるMgOを主成分とす
る塩基性耐火物の溶損量におよぼす処理剤中の
MgO濃度の影響を(%CaF2)/{(%CaO)+
(%CaF2)}(重量比)別に示す図、第2図は本発
明におけるCaO−CaF2系処理剤のCaF2濃度と処
理剤中へのAl2O3系介在物吸収量の関係図、第3
図イ,ロは、具体例A〜Dおよび実施例BB、
BC、比較例E〜Jおよび従来例K等に用いた設
備の立面図、第4図は実施例CA〜CDおよび
AA、ABを用いた装置の構成説明図、第5図は
具体例B、C、実施例CA〜CDと比較例F、Gに
おける処理後の介在物検出頻度を球状介在物と浮
上しにくい非球状、Al2O3クラスターに分けて示
した図、第6図は実施例AA、ABにおける処理
後の介在物検出頻度を示した図、第7図は実施例
BB、BCにおける処理後の介在物検出頻度を球状
介在物と浮上しにくい非球状、Al2O3クラスター
に分けて示した図、第8図は従来広く用いられて
いる浴面上の取鍋スラグを撹拌して脱硫を行う反
応容器の立面図である。 1……取鍋、2……反応槽(循環路)、3……
吹込管、5……出鍋口、6……導管、7……溶
鋼、8……スラグ、11……フタ、32……排気
系、40……減圧装置、50,51,58……ホ
ツパー、52……分析装置、53……処理パター
ン設定器、54,55,59……フイーダー、5
6……演算・指令装置、57……設定信号。
Figure 1A shows the influence of the MgO concentration in the treatment agent on the desulfurization rate in the present invention by (%CaF 2 )/
Figures shown by {(%CaO) + (%CaF 2 )} (weight ratio),
Figure 1B shows the effect of the treatment agent on the amount of erosion of the basic refractory mainly composed of MgO in the present invention.
The effect of MgO concentration is (%CaF 2 )/{(%CaO) +
(%CaF 2 )} (weight ratio); Figure 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the CaF 2 concentration of the CaO-CaF 2 -based treatment agent and the amount of Al 2 O 3 -based inclusions absorbed into the treatment agent in the present invention. , 3rd
Figures A and B show specific examples A to D and example BB,
BC, an elevational view of the equipment used in Comparative Examples E to J and Conventional Example K, etc.; Figure 4 is an elevational view of the equipment used in Examples CA to CD and
Fig. 5 is an explanatory diagram of the configuration of the apparatus using AA and AB, and shows the frequency of inclusion detection after processing in specific examples B and C, examples CA to CD, and comparative examples F and G. A diagram showing the inclusions divided into spherical and Al 2 O 3 clusters, Figure 6 is a diagram showing the frequency of inclusion detection after treatment in Examples AA and AB, and Figure 7 is an example
Figure 8 shows the detection frequency of inclusions after treatment in BB and BC, divided into spherical inclusions, non-spherical inclusions that are difficult to float, and Al 2 O 3 clusters. FIG. 2 is an elevational view of a reaction vessel in which desulfurization is performed by stirring slag. 1...Ladle, 2...Reaction tank (circulation path), 3...
Blowing pipe, 5...Taking pot opening, 6...Conduit, 7... Molten steel, 8...Slag, 11...Lid, 32...Exhaust system, 40...Pressure reduction device, 50, 51, 58...Hopper , 52... Analyzer, 53... Processing pattern setter, 54, 55, 59... Feeder, 5
6... Arithmetic/command device, 57... Setting signal.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 MgOを含む塩基性耐火物をライニングした
反応槽において溶鋼脱硫処理を行う場合に、浴中
に吹込んだキヤリヤガスが該浴内を浮上して到達
する浴の上面部分を減圧又は不活性ガス雰囲気に
保持し、且つスラグを実質的に存在せしめること
く、不活性ガスをキヤリヤガスとして、CaO、
CaF2、およびMgOと、その他不可避的成分から
成り、MgOが10〜60重量%、重量比で{CaF2
(CaO+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%からなる第1の
処理剤を浴中に吹込むと共に、これの吹込前、及
び又は吹込後に、CaF2及びCaOを主成分とし残
部が不可避的成分からなり、且つ上記CaF2及び
CaOからなる主成分中のCaF2濃度が20重量%以
下である第2の処理剤を、不活性ガスをキヤリヤ
ガスとして上記浴中に吹込むことを特徴とする溶
鋼の処理方法。 2 MgOを含む塩基性耐火物をライニングした
反応槽において溶鋼脱硫処理を行う場合に、浴中
に吹込んだキヤリヤガスが該浴内を浮上して到達
する浴の上面部分を減圧又は不活性ガス雰囲気に
保持し、且つスラグを実質的に存在せしめること
く、不活性ガスをキヤリヤガスとして、CaO、
CaF2、およびMgOと、その他不可避的成分から
成り、MgOが10〜60重量%、重量比で{CaF2
(CaO+CaF2)}×100=20〜80%からなる第1の
処理剤を浴中に吹込むと共に、これの吹込前、及
び又は吹込後に、CaF2及びCaOを主成分とし残
部が不可避的成分からなり、且つ上記CaF2及び
CaOからなる主成分中のCaF2濃度が20重量%以
下である第2の処理剤を、不活性ガスをキヤリヤ
ガスとして上記浴中に吹込み、次いで浴面上のス
ラグを実質的に撹拌又は流動せさせることなく、
不活性ガスを溶鋼内に吹込む処理を、行うことを
特徴とする溶鋼の処理方法。
[Claims] 1. When desulfurizing molten steel is carried out in a reaction tank lined with a basic refractory containing MgO, a carrier gas blown into the bath floats in the bath and reaches the upper surface of the bath. CaO,
Consists of CaF 2 , MgO, and other unavoidable components; MgO is 10 to 60% by weight, and the weight ratio is {CaF 2 /
(CaO + CaF 2 )} x 100 = 20 to 80% of the first treatment agent is blown into the bath, and before and/or after this is blown into the bath, CaF 2 and CaO are the main components, and the remainder is unavoidable components. and the above CaF 2 and
A method for treating molten steel, characterized in that a second treating agent having a CaF 2 concentration in the main component consisting of CaO is 20% by weight or less is blown into the bath using an inert gas as a carrier gas. 2 When desulfurizing molten steel in a reaction tank lined with a basic refractory containing MgO, the upper surface of the bath, where the carrier gas blown into the bath floats up and reaches the bath, is under reduced pressure or in an inert gas atmosphere. CaO,
Consists of CaF 2 , MgO, and other unavoidable components; MgO is 10 to 60% by weight, and the weight ratio is {CaF 2 /
(CaO + CaF 2 )} x 100 = 20 to 80% of the first treatment agent is blown into the bath, and before and/or after this is blown into the bath, CaF 2 and CaO are the main components, and the remainder is unavoidable components. and the above CaF 2 and
A second treatment agent having a CaF2 concentration of 20% by weight or less in the main component consisting of CaO is blown into the bath using an inert gas as a carrier gas, and then the slag on the bath surface is substantially stirred or fluidized. without making you feel
A method for treating molten steel, which comprises blowing an inert gas into the molten steel.
JP61035093A 1986-02-21 1986-02-21 Treatment of molten steel Granted JPS62196317A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP61035093A JPS62196317A (en) 1986-02-21 1986-02-21 Treatment of molten steel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP61035093A JPS62196317A (en) 1986-02-21 1986-02-21 Treatment of molten steel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62196317A JPS62196317A (en) 1987-08-29
JPH0361721B2 true JPH0361721B2 (en) 1991-09-20

Family

ID=12432336

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP61035093A Granted JPS62196317A (en) 1986-02-21 1986-02-21 Treatment of molten steel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS62196317A (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5157228B2 (en) * 2007-04-11 2013-03-06 新日鐵住金株式会社 Desulfurization method for molten steel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS62196317A (en) 1987-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0194098B1 (en) Treating agent for desulfurizing molten steels and method for treating molten steels
CN101294233A (en) A method for simultaneous desiliconization and demanganization of molten iron
US3565605A (en) Process for the continuous refining of metals
CN114657323A (en) Deep desulfurization method for LF (ladle furnace)
KR950013823B1 (en) Method of making steel
JP3903580B2 (en) Method of melting high cleanliness steel
JPH0361721B2 (en)
JPH05239534A (en) Method for melting non-oriented electric steel sheet
CN116716450A (en) A kind of low silicon steel smelting method
EP0143276B1 (en) Process to control the shape of inclusions in steels
RU2201458C1 (en) Method of modification of steel
JPH08283826A (en) Method for producing highly clean ultra-low sulfur HIC steel
JP3903603B2 (en) Melting method of ultra-low carbon steel with excellent cleanability
KR100336855B1 (en) Flux wire for use in the manufacture of high purity aluminum deoxidized steel
JPS6123243B2 (en)
KR910006640B1 (en) Making process for high pure steel
KR940008457B1 (en) Molten steel desulfurization method in vacuum tank of vacuum degassing apparatus
JPS62196314A (en) Operating method for converter
JPH07224317A (en) Production of high cleanliness steel
JPS6383219A (en) Molten steel treating agent for inclusion absorption/ floatation and molten steel treating method and device therefor
JPS61223120A (en) Method for decreasing inclusion in molten steel
KR100224637B1 (en) Deoxidation agent for al-deoxidation steel
JP3671769B2 (en) Control method of slag forming during refining
KR100347604B1 (en) Manufacturing method of high clean steel using hydrogen containing metal
KR20050037076A (en) Method for manufacturing steel with low sulfur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees