JPH0558501B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0558501B2 JPH0558501B2 JP61112722A JP11272286A JPH0558501B2 JP H0558501 B2 JPH0558501 B2 JP H0558501B2 JP 61112722 A JP61112722 A JP 61112722A JP 11272286 A JP11272286 A JP 11272286A JP H0558501 B2 JPH0558501 B2 JP H0558501B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- measurement
- range
- peak level
- echo
- surface echo
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 65
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001492221 Echovirus E12 Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011179 visual inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
〔産業上の利用分野〕
本発明は、液槽内に浸漬させて被検体を、自動
走査して測定する超音波測定方法に関し、特に自
動測定開始時にその開始の可否を判別するのに好
適な方法である。[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to an ultrasonic measurement method in which a specimen is automatically scanned and measured by immersing it in a liquid bath, and in particular, it concerns whether or not the automatic measurement can be started at the time of starting the automatic measurement. This is a suitable method for determining.
液槽内に浸漬させた被検体を自動走査して測定
する従来の超音波測定装置の1例を、第4図およ
び第5図を参照して説明する。第4図は装置の構
成を説明するブロツク図で、1は被検体、2は探
触子である。被検体1は本例の場合回転部材で、
チヤツク3で着脱自在に把持される。チヤツク3
は回転装置4に連結されており所定のピツチ角度
で回転させられる。探触子2はホルダ5に取付け
られ、たとえば第5図に示すような走査装置6に
より被検体1の測定面を矢印方向X,Y,Zの3
軸方向に走査し、走査して得られる反射波信号を
超音波測定器8に入力する。入力された信号は
A/D変換器を介してCPU9に送られる。回転
装置4および走査装置6は、CPU9に接続され
ているそれぞれの制御装置7を有しており、回転
装置4および走査装置6の動作を組合わせて制御
することにより各動作、すなわち液槽(通常水を
入れた水槽が多く使用されており以下水槽で説明
する)外における被検体1のチヤツク3への装
着、被検体1の水中への浸漬、ホルダ5に取付け
られている探触子2を浸漬された被検体1の測定
面に一定の距離に対向させて配置する移動、走査
開始、測定位置変更のための被検体1の回転、測
定終了にともなく被検体1のチヤツク3からの取
外し等一連の動作が行われる。れらの各動作は被
検体1の種類に応じた測定用のソフトプログラム
にもとづき、CPU9を介してほぼ自動的に行わ
れる。このため自動走査が開始されると、デイス
プレイに表示される測定値が極端に異常を示す以
外は、たとえ測定開始時における測定条件が不良
であつてもその不良はほとんどの場合、円周上の
全測定位置の測定が終了し、その測定結果から測
定条件の不良に起因する異常値を発見するまで確
認し得ないのが実状であつた。測定値に影響を及
ぼす測定開始時の測定条件は、水の汚れの程度、
被検体1のチヤツク3における把持状態(例えば
斜めにチヤツキングした場合など)、被検体1の
測定面の粗さなどが主なものとして挙げられる。
このうち水の汚れについては従来から作業員の目
視にもとづく判断で交換しており、その判断は個
人差が避けられず、同様に測定値におよぼす影響
についても一定でなく影響が許容限度を超す場合
もある。被検体1の把持状態は、被検体1をいつ
たんチヤツク3に把持させると通常は正しくチヤ
ツキングされるから、再確認しないのが普通であ
り、万一多少斜めにチヤツキングされている場合
でも測定は進行するので気付かないで測定開始さ
れることがほとんどである。測定面の粗さについ
てはいろいろなケースがあり、所定の粗さに加工
されていない場合、加工洩れの場合、測定面に所
定の粗さ以上の傷がある場合、ごみが付着してい
る場合などがありいずれも測定値に影響を及ぼす
が、これらの場合も前記被検体1の把持状態と同
様に測定は進行するので、測定開始時には気付か
ず測定終了後の結果から異常を発見するにとどま
つていた。また測定結果から異常値を発見しても
前記測定開始時のどの測定条件の影響かの判定は
不可能であつた。
An example of a conventional ultrasonic measuring device that automatically scans and measures a subject immersed in a liquid bath will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5. FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the configuration of the apparatus, in which 1 is a subject and 2 is a probe. In this example, the object 1 is a rotating member,
It is detachably held by the chuck 3. Check 3
is connected to a rotating device 4 and rotated at a predetermined pitch angle. The probe 2 is attached to a holder 5, and a scanning device 6 as shown in FIG.
It scans in the axial direction and inputs the reflected wave signal obtained by scanning into the ultrasonic measuring device 8. The input signal is sent to the CPU 9 via the A/D converter. The rotating device 4 and the scanning device 6 each have a respective control device 7 connected to the CPU 9, and each operation, that is, the liquid tank ( Usually, a water tank filled with water is often used (explained below with reference to the water tank), attaching the subject 1 to the chuck 3 outside, immersing the subject 1 in water, and the probe 2 attached to the holder 5. movement to place the test object 1 at a fixed distance from the immersed measurement surface of the test object 1, start scanning, rotate the test object 1 to change the measurement position, and release the chuck 3 of the test object 1 at the end of the measurement. A series of operations such as removal are performed. Each of these operations is almost automatically performed via the CPU 9 based on a measurement software program depending on the type of the subject 1. Therefore, when automatic scanning starts, unless the measurement value displayed on the display shows an extreme abnormality, even if the measurement conditions at the start of the measurement are poor, in most cases the defects will be on the circumference. The reality is that it is not possible to confirm abnormal values caused by poor measurement conditions until measurements at all measurement positions are completed and abnormal values are found from the measurement results. Measurement conditions at the start of measurement that affect measured values include the degree of water contamination,
The main factors include the grip state of the chuck 3 of the subject 1 (for example, when chucked at an angle), the roughness of the measurement surface of the subject 1, etc.
Contaminated water has traditionally been replaced based on the judgment of workers based on their visual inspection, and this judgment inevitably varies from person to person. Similarly, the effect on measured values is not constant, and the effect may exceed the permissible limit. In some cases. The grip state of the specimen 1 is normally not checked again because once the specimen 1 is gripped by the chuck 3, it is chucked correctly, and even if the chuck is chucked slightly diagonally, the measurement is still accurate. As the process progresses, in most cases, measurement begins without you noticing. There are various cases regarding the roughness of the measurement surface, such as cases where it is not machined to the specified roughness, cases of machining omissions, cases where the measurement surface has scratches exceeding the specified roughness, and cases where dust is attached. In these cases, the measurement proceeds in the same way as in the gripping state of the object 1, so the abnormality may not be noticed at the start of the measurement, but only discovered from the results after the measurement is completed. It was on. Further, even if an abnormal value is found from the measurement results, it is impossible to determine which measurement condition at the start of the measurement is the cause.
前記従来の法においては、測定開始時における
測定条件がたとえ不良であつてもその不良は、測
定終了後の測定結果から異常値を発見るまで確認
し得ず、また異常値を発見してもどの測定条件の
不良によるものかの判定もできない問題があつ
た。
In the conventional method, even if the measurement conditions at the start of the measurement are poor, the defect cannot be confirmed until an abnormal value is found in the measurement results after the measurement is completed, and even if an abnormal value is found, the fault cannot be confirmed. There was a problem in which it was not possible to determine which measurement condition was the cause of the defect.
本発明は前記従来技術の問題点を解消するもの
であつて、被検体の自動測定開始時にその開始の
可否を判別するとともに、開始否の場合における
その原因をも容易に判別することができる超音波
測定方法を提供ることを目的とする。 The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, and is an ultra-high technology capable of determining whether automatic measurement of a subject can be started at the time of starting automatic measurement, and also easily determining the cause when automatic measurement of a subject cannot be started. The purpose is to provide a method for measuring sound waves.
本発明は、液に浸漬した被検体の測定面を、該
測定面と前記液を介して一定の距離に対向させた
探触子により、自動走査して測定する超音波測定
方法において、基準試験片を使用し、かつ基準の
測定条件下で、測定面より反射する表面反射波の
エコーのピークレベル出現位置に、該位置を中心
に出現位置のずれを許容する一定の範囲を設定
し、該範囲と、被検体の互いに離れた複数の測定
点における表面エコーの各ピークレベルの出現位
置とを比較し、該各出現位置が前記範囲内か否か
により自動測定の開始の可否を判別するようにし
たことにより、開始可否を短時間に容易かつ実に
判別することができるとともに、開始否の場合に
おける原因を迅速に判別することができるように
した超音波測定方法である。
The present invention provides a reference test in an ultrasonic measurement method in which a measurement surface of a specimen immersed in a liquid is automatically scanned and measured by a probe that is opposed to the measurement surface at a fixed distance through the liquid. Under standard measurement conditions, a certain range is set around the position where the peak level of the echo of the surface reflected wave reflected from the measurement surface is allowed to shift. The range is compared with the appearance position of each peak level of the surface echo at a plurality of measurement points distant from each other on the subject, and it is determined whether or not to start automatic measurement based on whether each appearance position is within the range. This ultrasonic measurement method makes it possible to easily and accurately determine whether or not a start is possible in a short period of time, as well as quickly determine the cause in the case where a start is not possible.
本発明に係わる超音波測定方法は、被検体を液
浸法により自動走査して測定る超音波測定装置を
使用し、被検体の測定に入る前にあらかじめ基準
となる試験片、たとえば被検体のうち寸法、形
状、加工精度等が図面通り正しく製作され合格し
ているものか、または特に基準試験片として製作
したものを使用し、かつ基準の測定条件たとえば
液(水等)が新しくて汚れのないこと、チヤツク
への装着不良がなく正しく測定面と探触子とが相
対していること、測定面に傷やごの付着などがな
いこと等の条件下で、測定装置のCRT上に測定
面の表面エコーを出現させ、該表面エコーのピー
クレベルを中心にビーム路程の方向およびゲイン
方向に、被検体の種類に応じたピークレベルの出
現位置のずれを許容する一定の範囲を設定してお
き、被検体の測定に入つた場合、各被検体の開始
時に被検体の互いに離れた複数(3点以上が望ま
しい)の測定点における各表面エコーのピークレ
ベルの出現位置が、前記設定範囲内にあるか否か
を比較し、範囲内の場合は測定開始可とし、範囲
外の場合は測定条件の不良原因解明のための処理
フロートにもとづき原因を解明し、不良原因が排
除されるまで測定開始を否と判別する方法で、容
易に短時間に判別することができる方法である。
The ultrasonic measurement method according to the present invention uses an ultrasonic measurement device that automatically scans and measures a test object using an immersion method, and before starting measurement of the test object, a reference test piece, such as a test piece of the test object, is prepared in advance. Among them, the dimensions, shape, processing accuracy, etc. must be correctly manufactured according to the drawings and have passed the test, or those manufactured specifically as standard test pieces should be used, and the standard measurement conditions must be met, such as when the liquid (water, etc.) is new and dirty. The measuring surface should be displayed on the CRT of the measuring device under conditions such as: the measuring surface is not properly attached to the chuck, the measuring surface and the probe are facing each other correctly, and there are no scratches or dirt on the measuring surface. A certain range is set around the peak level of the surface echo in the direction of the beam path and in the gain direction to allow deviation of the appearance position of the peak level depending on the type of object. , when starting the measurement of the object, at the start of each object, the appearance position of the peak level of each surface echo at multiple (preferably 3 or more) measurement points distant from each other on the object is within the set range. If it is within the range, measurement can be started; if it is outside the range, the cause is determined based on the processing float for elucidating the cause of the defect in the measurement conditions, and measurement is started until the cause of the defect is eliminated. This is a method that can easily and quickly determine whether the
本発明の実施例を第1図ないし第3図を参照し
て説明する。第1図は基準試試験片の表面エコー
のピークレベルを中心に設定したピークレベルの
出現位置のずれを許容する範囲の一例を示す図、
第2図は基準試験片の正しい表面エコーと、測定
開始条件が不良の場合の表面エコーとの対比説明
図で、第2図aは正しい表面エコーの図、第2図
bは表面エコーのピークレベルがゲイン方向に画
面で上下に(本例では下方に)変化した図、第2
図cは同じくビーム路程の方向およびゲイン方向
(画面で左右および上下方向)に変化した図を示
し、第3図は被検体の測定開始の可否を判別るた
めのフローチヤートの一例である。図において1
0はCRT15上に表示された基準試試験片の表
面エコーで、そのピークレベルの出現位置には該
位置を中心に点線で囲んだ範囲Aが設定されてい
る。範囲Aは使用する探触子や超音波測定器、被
検体の種類等に応じて予め決められ、ピークレベ
ルの出現位置のずれを許容する一定の範囲を示す
もので、図示のような矩形に限ることなく円形、
だ円形、正方形、多角形等任意の形状および大き
さに決められる。第2図aは第1図に示す表面エ
コー10と同じで、第2図bは表面エコー10を
鎖線で示し、表面エコー10よりピークレベルが
低くビーム路程の同じ表面エコー11を実線で示
す。この図の場合、表面エコー11のピークレベ
ルは鎖線で示す範囲Aの外にあり、測定条件不良
で測定開始は否と判定される。そして測定条件の
不良原因は、表面エコー11のピークレベルの出
現位置が表面エコー10と同一のビーム路程でゲ
インが低下するだけであるから、水内の水の汚れ
であることが判別される。第2図c鎖線で示す表
面エコー10に対し、ビーム路程およびゲインが
変化する実線で示す表面エコー12と点線で示す
表面エコー13が交互に出現する場合で、本図の
場合は変化量が範囲Aの内にあり測定開始は可と
判定される。しかし変化量が大きく表面エコー1
2,13ともそのピークレベルが範囲Aを外れる
場合には、被検体のチヤツキングをし直して再走
査し、ビーム路程およびゲインの変化がほぼ解消
すれば、不良原因は被検体のチヤツクへの装着不
良であることが判別され、前記変化が依然として
解消されない場合は不良原因は測定面の粗さ、
傷、ごみの付着等によるものと判別される。第3
図は被検体が回転体の場合の測定開始の可否およ
び測定条件の不良原因の判別のためのフローチヤ
ートで、本チヤートにもとづき自動的に容易にか
つ短時間に判別を行うことができる。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 3. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a range in which a shift in the appearance position of the peak level is allowed, which is set around the peak level of the surface echo of the reference test specimen.
Figure 2 is an explanatory diagram of the comparison between the correct surface echo of the standard test piece and the surface echo when the measurement starting conditions are poor. Figure 2a is a diagram of the correct surface echo, and Figure 2b is the peak of the surface echo. The second diagram shows the level changing up and down (downward in this example) on the screen in the direction of gain.
Figure c similarly shows a diagram showing changes in the direction of the beam path and the gain direction (horizontal and vertical directions on the screen), and Figure 3 is an example of a flowchart for determining whether or not to start measurement of the object. In the figure 1
0 is the surface echo of the reference test specimen displayed on the CRT 15, and a range A surrounded by a dotted line around this position is set as the position where the peak level appears. Range A is predetermined according to the probe, ultrasonic measuring device, and type of object being used, and indicates a certain range that allows deviation in the appearance position of the peak level. circular without limitation,
Any shape and size such as oval, square, polygon, etc. can be determined. 2a is the same as the surface echo 10 shown in FIG. 1, and FIG. 2b shows the surface echo 10 with a chain line, and the surface echo 11 with a lower peak level and the same beam path than the surface echo 10 with a solid line. In the case of this figure, the peak level of the surface echo 11 is outside the range A indicated by the chain line, and it is determined that the measurement conditions are poor and it is not possible to start the measurement. The cause of the poor measurement conditions is determined to be water contamination in the water, since the peak level of the surface echo 11 appears at the same beam path path as the surface echo 10, and the gain simply decreases. Fig. 2c shows a case in which a surface echo 12 shown by a solid line and a surface echo 13 shown by a dotted line appear alternately with respect to a surface echo 10 shown by a chain line, where the beam path and gain change.In the case of this figure, the amount of change is within a range. Since it is within A, it is determined that it is possible to start measurement. However, the amount of change is large and the surface echo 1
If the peak levels of both 2 and 13 are outside range A, chuck the test object again and scan again. If the changes in the beam path and gain are almost eliminated, the cause of the failure is due to the mounting of the test object on the chuck. If it is determined that it is defective and the change is still not resolved, the cause of the defect is the roughness of the measurement surface,
It is determined that this is due to scratches, dirt, etc. Third
The figure is a flowchart for determining whether or not to start measurement and the cause of poor measurement conditions when the object to be examined is a rotating body.Based on this chart, the determination can be made automatically, easily, and in a short time.
なお前記実施例においては、被検体が回転部材
の場合について説明したが、チヤツクを変更する
ことにより平面部材や棒状部材でもよく、また被
検体と探触子のうちいずれを移動させて走査する
ようにしてもよい。さらにCRTに表示されたエ
コーを比較して判別する例を示したが、他のアナ
ログ信号またはデジタル信号を比較するようにし
てもよいのはもちろんである。 In the above embodiments, the case where the object to be examined is a rotating member was explained, but it may be a flat member or a rod-shaped member by changing the chuck, and it is also possible to move either the object or the probe for scanning. You can also do this. Furthermore, although an example has been shown in which echoes displayed on a CRT are compared and discriminated, it is of course possible to compare other analog signals or digital signals.
以上説明したように本発明は、基準試験片によ
る表面エコーのピークレベル位置に、該位置を中
心に一定の範囲を設定し、その範囲と被検体を測
定したときの表面エコーのピークレベル位置とを
比較し、その位置が設定範囲内か否により自動測
定の開始の可否を判別するようにしたから、開始
の可否を短時間に容易かつ確実に判別することが
できるともに、開始否の場合における原因を迅速
に判別することができる実用上顕著な効果を有す
る。
As explained above, the present invention sets a certain range around the peak level position of the surface echo by the reference test piece, and compares this range with the peak level position of the surface echo when measuring the object. Since it is possible to determine whether or not automatic measurement can be started based on whether the position is within the set range, it is possible to easily and reliably determine whether or not automatic measurement can be started in a short time. This has a significant practical effect in that the cause can be quickly identified.
第1図は本発明に係わる測定方法の1例を説明
する図、第2図は第1図に示す表面エコーと測定
開始条件が不良の場合の表面エコーとの対比説明
図、第3図は第2図に対するフローチヤートの1
例を示す。第4図は従来の測定装置の構成の1例
を説明するブロツク図、第5図は第4図に示す走
査装置の1例を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining one example of the measurement method according to the present invention, FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the comparison between the surface echo shown in FIG. 1 and the surface echo when the measurement starting conditions are poor, and FIG. Flowchart 1 for Figure 2
Give an example. FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a conventional measuring device, and FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the scanning device shown in FIG. 4.
Claims (1)
前記液を介して一定の距離に対向させた探触子に
より、自動走査して測定する超音波測定方法にお
いて、基準試験片を使用し、かつ基準の測定条件
下で、測定面より反射する表面反射波のエコーの
ピークレベル出現位置に、該位置を中心に出現位
置のずれを許容する一定の範囲を設定し、該範囲
と、被検体の互いに離れた複数の測定点における
表面エコーの各ピークレベルの出現位置とを比較
し、該各出現位置が前記範囲内か否かにより自動
測定の開始の可否を判別することを特徴とする超
音波測定方法。1. A reference test piece is used in an ultrasonic measurement method in which the measurement surface of a specimen immersed in a liquid is automatically scanned and measured by a probe that is opposed to the measurement surface at a certain distance through the liquid. and, under standard measurement conditions, a certain range is set at the peak level appearance position of the echo of the surface reflected wave reflected from the measurement surface, and a certain range is set around the position to allow deviation of the appearance position, and the range and It is characterized by comparing the appearance positions of each peak level of the surface echo at a plurality of measurement points separated from each other on the subject, and determining whether or not to start automatic measurement based on whether each appearance position is within the range. Ultrasonic measurement method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61112722A JPS62269058A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1986-05-19 | Ultrasonic measuring method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61112722A JPS62269058A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1986-05-19 | Ultrasonic measuring method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS62269058A JPS62269058A (en) | 1987-11-21 |
| JPH0558501B2 true JPH0558501B2 (en) | 1993-08-26 |
Family
ID=14593889
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61112722A Granted JPS62269058A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1986-05-19 | Ultrasonic measuring method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS62269058A (en) |
-
1986
- 1986-05-19 JP JP61112722A patent/JPS62269058A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS62269058A (en) | 1987-11-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105548353B (en) | A kind of ultrasonic wave coating detection method | |
| CA2011681C (en) | Determination of dimensions of tubes | |
| US5036707A (en) | Ultrasonic testing apparatus and method for rapidly inspecting a large number of gas cylinders of similar design for internal neck-shoulder defects | |
| CN113655119A (en) | Water immersion ultrasonic device for evaluating corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy materials and using method thereof | |
| JPH06500170A (en) | Eddy current imaging system | |
| JPS63173958A (en) | Automatic ultrasonic flow detection | |
| JPH0558501B2 (en) | ||
| JPH09325136A (en) | Automatic defect evaluation method for centrifugal impeller | |
| JPS63121748A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| CN114820559A (en) | Ultrasonic image defect detection method based on image entropy and recursive analysis | |
| KR102106089B1 (en) | Transducer performance degradation compensation apparatus applied to OLED panel non-destructive tester | |
| CN112862971A (en) | Three-dimensional image reconstruction method and device for detecting irregular defects in plate | |
| JPH07117427B2 (en) | Measuring accuracy of measuring instruments | |
| JP2524540B2 (en) | Ultrasonic inspection method | |
| GB2169102A (en) | Non-destructive testing | |
| JPS63134950A (en) | Ultrasonic wave measuring system | |
| Lamarre | High-resolution corrosion monitoring for reliable assessment of infrastructure | |
| SAKAMOTO et al. | Estimation of fatigue crack growth by ultrasonic imaging method | |
| JPS62273449A (en) | Ultrasonic measurement | |
| JPH052103B2 (en) | ||
| JPH09274020A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection method for steel | |
| JP3604547B2 (en) | Ultrasonic inspection apparatus and sample detection method thereof | |
| JPH0354456A (en) | Internal defect measurement method for objects with uneven surfaces | |
| JPH0385444A (en) | Detecting system for continuity defect in ultrasonic measurement | |
| JPH01109258A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection equipment |