JPH062886B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents
Blast furnace operation methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH062886B2 JPH062886B2 JP21773585A JP21773585A JPH062886B2 JP H062886 B2 JPH062886 B2 JP H062886B2 JP 21773585 A JP21773585 A JP 21773585A JP 21773585 A JP21773585 A JP 21773585A JP H062886 B2 JPH062886 B2 JP H062886B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- furnace
- distribution
- cohesive zone
- shape
- blast furnace
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、高炉操業方法に関するものである。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a blast furnace operating method.
高炉の操業において炉内の通気性が最も重要な課題の一
つであり、この通気性確保には融着帯と呼ばれる鉱石が
軟化・融着している領域を適正な形状に保持することが
必要とされている。このため従来より操業中に融着帯を
検知し、操業解析に活用する方法が種々提案されてい
る。例えば、特開昭50−53203号公報に示される
ように炉内径方向数ケ所に水平ゾンデを挿入して測定し
た炉内のガス温度、ガス成分を数式モデルに代入して解
き融着帯位置を検知する方法がある。又、特公昭53−
19216号公報に示されるように高炉炉頂よりコーク
ス−鉄鉱石類−鉄鉱石類−コークスのごとく、通常の交
互装入ではなく、二回続けて装入した鉄鉱石類を通過す
る炉内ガスの圧力変化を検出し、装入から該圧力変化を
検出するまでの降下時間を計算して融着帯頂部を検出す
る方法がある。さらに特公昭57−52925号公報に
示されるように高炉炉壁高さ方向の複数ケ所それぞれに
ついて炉壁温度を測定してその平均値の統計処理により
融着帯根部を検知する方法等がある。Permeability inside the furnace is one of the most important issues in the operation of a blast furnace, and in order to secure this permeability, it is necessary to maintain the region where the ore softened and fused, called the cohesive zone, in an appropriate shape. is necessary. Therefore, conventionally, various methods have been proposed for detecting the cohesive zone during operation and utilizing it for operation analysis. For example, as shown in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 50-53203, gas temperatures and gas components in the furnace, which are measured by inserting horizontal sondes in several positions in the inner diameter direction of the furnace, are substituted into a mathematical model to determine the fusion zone position. There is a way to detect. Also, Japanese Patent Publication Sho 53-
As shown in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 19216, as in the case of coke-iron ore-iron ore-coke from the furnace top of the blast furnace, the gas in the furnace passing through the iron ore continuously charged twice instead of the usual alternate charging. There is a method of detecting the pressure change of No. 1, and calculating the fall time from the charging to the detection of the pressure change to detect the top of the cohesive zone. Further, as shown in Japanese Patent Publication No. 57-52925, there is a method of detecting the cohesive zone root portion by measuring the furnace wall temperature at each of a plurality of locations in the furnace wall height direction and statistically processing the average value thereof.
従来の技術は種々の検出端を駆使して炉内を把握するこ
とに重点が置かれており、現象論的に問題をとらえ、解
決手段をケースバイケースで考えてゆくという手法が中
心であった。一方、高炉内反応をモデル化して数式モデ
ルを組み立て、シミュレーションしてゆくという理論的
なアプローチも近年の計算機の発達によってかなり進歩
した。しかしながら高炉内では流動・伝熱・反応と複雑
に現象が絡み合っており、多くの未知数を仮定して問題
を解く必要があり、実際の炉況をシミュレートしていな
い場合も少なくない。かくして、高炉内を精度よく推定
し、制御してやるためには、検出端を活用した高精度の
現象把握能力と、理論的に裏付けされた推定モデルとを
有機的に結合し、一長一短のあるそれぞれの技術を補完
し、なおかつ従来法にない精度と広範囲に応用できる解
析システムが望まれる。本発明は測定ゾンデで得られた
情報と高炉数式モデルを組み合わせて最適な融着帯の位
置および形状を求めて操業する方法を提供するものであ
る。The conventional technology has focused on grasping the inside of the furnace by making full use of various detection ends, and mainly focuses on the method of phenomenologically grasping the problem and thinking of a solution on a case-by-case basis. It was On the other hand, the theoretical approach of modeling the reaction in the blast furnace, assembling a mathematical model, and simulating it has also progressed considerably with the development of computers in recent years. However, in the blast furnace, phenomena such as flow, heat transfer, and reaction are intricately intertwined, and it is necessary to solve the problem by assuming many unknowns, and in many cases the actual furnace conditions are not simulated. Thus, in order to accurately estimate and control the inside of the blast furnace, it is possible to organically combine the highly accurate phenomenon grasping ability utilizing the detection end with the theoretically supported estimation model to obtain advantages and disadvantages. It is desirable to have an analysis system that complements the technology and has a precision and a wide range of applications that cannot be achieved by conventional methods. The present invention provides a method for operating by finding the optimum position and shape of the cohesive zone by combining the information obtained by the measurement probe and the mathematical model of the blast furnace.
本発明による高炉操業方法の構成は、炉内の流動、反
応、および伝熱を同時解析した高炉数式モデルによって
シミュレートした融着帯の位置および形状を炉内の測定
ゾンデで得られた情報で検証し、鉱石還元分布、ガス温
度分布、圧力分布、融着帯形状の差が生じた場合ガス拡
散係数、ガス境膜伝熱抵抗、炉芯の空間率、および装入
物降下速度分布をパラメーターとして差異を修正し、実
炉における最適な融着帯の位置・形状を探索し、適度な
中心流が発達した逆V型を理想形として、装入物分布条
件および送風条件を調整して最適操業条件を見い出し、
実炉に適用することを特徴とする高炉の操業方法であ
る。The configuration of the blast furnace operating method according to the present invention is the information obtained from the measurement sonde in the furnace for the position and shape of the cohesive zone simulated by the blast furnace mathematical model in which the flow, reaction, and heat transfer in the furnace are simultaneously analyzed. After verification, if there are differences in ore reduction distribution, gas temperature distribution, pressure distribution, and cohesive zone shape, gas diffusion coefficient, gas film heat transfer resistance, core porosity, and charge descent rate distribution are parameters. As a result, the optimum position and shape of the cohesive zone in the actual furnace are sought, and the inverse V type with an appropriate central flow is idealized, and the charge distribution conditions and blast conditions are adjusted to optimize Find operating conditions,
It is a blast furnace operating method characterized by being applied to an actual furnace.
高炉数式モデルは第3図に示すように、高炉内の装入物
分布、ガス流れ、固体流れ、反応、伝熱を同時解析する
もので、以下の方法で順次計算を進め、融着帯形状が収
束するまで計算をくり返すことを特徴としている。As shown in Fig. 3, the mathematical model of the blast furnace is to simultaneously analyze the charge distribution, gas flow, solid flow, reaction, and heat transfer in the blast furnace. The feature is that the calculation is repeated until is converged.
高炉への原料装入方法は、鉱石とコークスを交互に層状
に装入し半径方向の鉱石重量/コークス重量および粒度
分布を制御することによってガス流分布を適正に配分し
ている。このときの鉱石・コークスの傾斜角はガス流速
を考慮して小さくし、落下点を中心に装入体積分だけ積
み上げる方式をとった。次にこの炉頂における装入面形
状を初期値として、装入物固体の流れを単純なピストン
流れとして計算する。第2図に示されるように鉱石は融
着帯1で収縮し、ついには液体として滴下するものとし
た。ガスの流れは前記固体流れとは逆方向であり、羽口
3より吹き込まれ通気性の悪い融着帯1を経由して炉頂
から排出される。高炉シャフト部でのガス流れはErgun
が示した充填層の圧力損失と流速の関係を使用した。In the method of charging the raw material into the blast furnace, the ore and the coke are charged alternately in layers and the ore weight / coke weight in the radial direction and the particle size distribution are controlled to appropriately distribute the gas flow distribution. At this time, the inclination angle of ore and coke was made small considering the gas flow velocity, and a method was adopted in which only the charging volume was accumulated around the falling point. Next, using the charging surface shape at the furnace top as an initial value, the solid flow of the charge is calculated as a simple piston flow. As shown in FIG. 2, the ore contracted in the cohesive zone 1 and was finally dropped as a liquid. The gas flow is in the opposite direction to the solid flow and is blown from the tuyere 3 and discharged from the furnace top through the cohesive zone 1 having poor air permeability. The gas flow at the shaft of the blast furnace is Ergun
The relationship between packed bed pressure drop and flow velocity was used.
−gradP=f1+f2||……(1) ここで P:圧力 G :ガス質量速度 φ:形状係数 gc:重力換算係数 dp:平均粒子径 μ :ガス粘性 ε:空間率 ρg:ガス密度 鉄鋼石の還元反応に関してはほとんどが一段の総括反応
速度式を用いているが、多段逐次で並列的に還元が進行
するとの機構に立脚した多界面反応モデルを採用した。
融着帯1の位置を決めるのはガス流れ、還元反応ばかり
でなく、ガスと固体間の伝熱メカニズムが最も密接なる
関係があると考えられる。粒子流体間の伝熱係数はRanz
が充填層について求めた式を基本に垂直ゾンデ等の測定
結果で補正した。-GradP = f 1 + f 2 || ... (1) where P: Pressure G: Gas mass velocity φ: Shape factor gc: Gravity conversion factor dp: Average particle size μ: Gas viscosity ε: Porosity ρ g : Gas density Most of the overall reaction rate equations for reducing iron ore However, a multi-interface reaction model based on the mechanism that reduction proceeds in parallel in multiple stages was adopted.
It is considered that not only the gas flow and the reduction reaction determine the position of the cohesive zone 1, but also the heat transfer mechanism between the gas and the solid has the closest relationship. The heat transfer coefficient between particle fluids is Ranz
Was corrected for the measurement results of the vertical sonde, etc. based on the formula obtained for the packed bed.
hp:粒子流体間の伝熱係数 Kg:ガスの熱伝導度 Pr:プラントル数 Rep:粒子レイノズル数 dp:粒子径 Ce:補正項 融着帯1は軟化開始温度と滴下開始温度を、還元率の関
数として与え、前記伝熱メカニズムで計算した温度分布
から形状を推定した。以上の計算を融着帯形状が安定す
るまでくり返し行ない、最後に融着帯形状、温度、還元
分布、ガス流れ、固体流れ等を出力することを特徴とし
ている。 hp: Heat transfer coefficient between particle fluids Kg: Thermal conductivity of gas Pr: Prandtl number Rep: Particle Reynolds number dp: Particle diameter Ce: Correction term The cohesive zone 1 is the softening start temperature and the dropping start temperature of the reduction rate. The shape was estimated from the temperature distribution calculated by the heat transfer mechanism given as a function. The above-mentioned calculation is repeated until the shape of the cohesive zone becomes stable, and finally the shape of the cohesive zone, temperature, reduction distribution, gas flow, solid flow, etc. are output.
該数式モデルとは別途に、高炉シャフト部において少な
くとも1個のセンサーを炉内装入物中に進入可能に設置
し、該センサーにより炉内のガス温度、ガス成分および
ガス圧力をシャフト上部から融着帯まで連続的に測定す
る。測定手段としては従来から一般に用いられている垂
直ゾンデによって行なうことができ、例えば特開昭59
−16917号公報を用いることによって容易に検出で
きる。次に前記高炉数式モデルを利用して上記で得られ
た該データに基づくガス流分布、鉱石還元率分布、ガス
温度分布、融着帯形状等の炉内状況が再現されるように
以下のように未知パラメーターの設定を実施する。Separately from the mathematical model, at least one sensor is installed on the shaft part of the blast furnace so as to be able to enter inside the furnace interior, and the gas temperature, gas components and gas pressure in the furnace are fused from the upper part of the shaft by the sensor. Measure continuously up to the belt. As a measuring means, a vertical sonde which has been generally used in the past can be used.
It can be easily detected by using JP-A-16917. Next, the conditions in the furnace such as gas flow distribution, ore reduction rate distribution, gas temperature distribution, and cohesive zone shape based on the data obtained above using the blast furnace mathematical model are reproduced as follows. Set unknown parameters to.
ガス流分布が一致しない場合は、炉芯の空間率係数を0
〜1まで変化させ、鉱石の還元率分布の場合は、ガスの
拡散律速と考えて拡散係数を同様に0〜1まで振らせ
る。ガス温度分布に対しては、同様にガス側の境膜伝熱
律速と考えてガス境膜伝熱抵抗係数を変化させる。この
ようにして得られた融着帯形状が該データに基づくもの
と一致するまで上記の操作をくり返す。第4図に比較結
果を示す。If the gas flow distributions do not match, the porosity coefficient of the core is set to 0.
In the case of ore reduction rate distribution, the diffusion coefficient is similarly varied from 0 to 1 on the assumption that the gas diffusion rate is controlled. Regarding the gas temperature distribution, similarly, the gas film heat transfer resistance coefficient is changed by considering the film side film heat transfer rate limiting. The above operation is repeated until the shape of the cohesive zone thus obtained matches that based on the data. The comparison results are shown in FIG.
こうして実炉と1対1に対応づけられた高炉数式モデル
を用いて問題解決のために思考実験を計算機を利用して
実施する。つまり、実際に操業アクションを取っても効
果が現われるのは数時間後であり、しかも一度炉況が悪
化するとなかなか回復しないという悪循環をくり返すの
が実体である。その点計算機を用いたシミュレーション
は短時間で効果が判明し、ドラスチックな操業条件に対
しても自由に試すことができる。In this way, a thought experiment is carried out using a computer to solve the problem by using the blast furnace mathematical model that is in one-to-one correspondence with the actual furnace. In other words, the actual effect is that after a few hours the effect will appear even if the operation action is actually taken, and once the reactor condition deteriorates, it does not recover easily and the vicious cycle repeats itself. In that case, the simulation using a computer can be found to be effective in a short time, and can be freely tested even under drastic operating conditions.
操業アクションには、主に装入物の分布制御と送風条件
の調整が考えられる。具体的には、鉱石/コークスの半
径方向分布、鉱石・コークスの半径方向粒度分布、送風
温度・送風湿分等を1つあるいはそれ以上組み合わせて
最適操業条件を見つけ出すことになる。最後にシミュレ
ーション結果より最適な操業アクションを採用し、該セ
ンサーによってその効果を確認し、不十分な場合はフィ
ードバックして再度上記操作をくり返す。以上の考え方
を第1図の思考フローにまとめて示した。The operation actions mainly include distribution control of charge and adjustment of blowing conditions. Specifically, one or more combinations of the ore / coke radial distribution, the ore / coke radial particle size distribution, the blast temperature, the blast moisture, and the like are used to find the optimum operating conditions. Finally, an optimal operation action is adopted from the simulation result, the effect is confirmed by the sensor, and if insufficient, feedback is given and the above operation is repeated. The above idea is summarized in the thought flow in Fig. 1.
本発明方法は通常操業から移行した操業、例えば粒粉炭
吹込みのように装入塊コークス量が大幅に低減したり、
あるいは高出鉄比操業のように降下速度が大幅に増大し
ボッシュガス量が低下するような場合において大きな効
果を有するものである。The method of the present invention is a transition from the normal operation, for example, the charging coke amount is greatly reduced as in the case of the injection of granular pulverized coal,
Alternatively, it has a great effect in the case where the descending speed is greatly increased and the Bosch gas amount is decreased as in the case of high iron output ratio operation.
実施例1 オールコークス操業から微粉炭吹込み(PCI)操業へ
の移行期に本発明である解析システムを実施した例を以
下に示す。Example 1 An example in which the analysis system of the present invention was carried out during the transition period from the all coke operation to the pulverized coal injection (PCI) operation is shown below.
微粉炭吹込みは羽口3から約1300℃の空気と同時に
微粉炭を吹込む操業であり、炉頂から装入する塊コーク
スの低減および原料炭と一般炭の価格差を狙った高炉操
業法である。第5図に示したように従来のオールコーク
ス操業とPCI操業を比較すると、羽口前の燃焼帯(レ
ースウェイ)2が拡大して溶解能力が増大するので周辺
の鉱石/コークス比を積極的に大きくし、中心ガス流を
保持する操業アクションを取った。これによって融着帯
頂部1bが上昇し、根部1aが低下した形となった。そ
の結果第6図に示すように根部1aが通気変動もなく安
定して低下することによって、溶鉄中の〔Si〕もオー
ルコークス時に比べて早期に約0.1%低下することが
できた。比較のために本発明を使用しない場合の従来の
オールコークス操業からPCI操業への移行を重ねて表
示した。当該解析システムがないため試行錯誤の連続に
よってやっと最適操業を見つけ出すことが可能であっ
た。Pulverized coal injection is an operation in which pulverized coal is blown from the tuyere 3 at the same time as air at about 1300 ° C, and it is a blast furnace operation method aiming at reduction of agglomerated coke charged from the top of furnace and difference in price between coking coal and steam coal. Is. As shown in Fig. 5, when comparing the conventional all-coke operation and PCI operation, the combustion zone (raceway) 2 in front of the tuyere expands and the melting capacity increases, so the ore / coke ratio in the surrounding area is positive. The operation action was taken to increase and maintain the central gas flow. As a result, the cohesive zone top portion 1b was raised and the root portion 1a was lowered. As a result, as shown in FIG. 6, the root portion 1a stably decreased without fluctuation of air flow, and [Si] in the molten iron could be decreased by about 0.1% earlier than in the all coke time. For comparison, the transition from the conventional all-coke operation to the PCI operation when the present invention is not used is overlaid and displayed. Since there is no such analysis system, it was possible to finally find the optimum operation by trial and error.
実施例2 高炉の改修期間等の増産が必要な場合において、酸素富
化と微粉炭吹込みを併用した高出鉄比操業が有効であ
る。酸素富化率を上昇すると熱流比(固体熱容量/気体
熱容量)が局部的に上昇してガスと固体の伝熱が十分行
なわれなくなり、鉱石が未還元状態で滴下するという現
象がレースウェイ直上で誘発される。そこで湿分を上
げ、レースウェイ2の温度を低下させ、ボッシュガス量
が増加する一方、周辺部の鉱石/コークス比率を融着帯
根部1a近傍の還元率が0.9以上になるように低下させ
た。その結果第7図に示すように平均出鉄比、2.5t/
Dmm3という高出鉄比を安定して持続することができ
た。Example 2 When it is necessary to increase production such as during blast furnace refurbishment, a high iron output ratio operation that combines oxygen enrichment and pulverized coal injection is effective. When the oxygen enrichment rate rises, the heat flow ratio (solid heat capacity / gas heat capacity) locally rises, heat transfer between gas and solid is not sufficiently carried out, and the phenomenon that ore drops in the unreduced state is directly above the raceway. Be triggered. Therefore, the moisture content was raised, the temperature of the raceway 2 was lowered, and the amount of Bosch gas was increased, while the ore / coke ratio in the peripheral portion was lowered so that the reduction rate in the vicinity of the cohesive zone root 1a was 0.9 or more. . As a result, as shown in Fig. 7, the average iron output ratio was 2.5t /
We were able to maintain a stable high iron output ratio of Dmm 3 .
以上詳細に説明した如く本発明法によれば、従来経験の
ない高炉操業法に移行しても安定操業が早期に達成さ
れ、低燃料比、低〔Si〕操業等に寄与できる高炉操業
上きわめてすぐれた発明である。As described in detail above, according to the method of the present invention, stable operation can be achieved early even if the method is changed to a blast furnace operation method that has not been used in the past, and it is possible to contribute to low fuel ratio, low [Si] operation, etc. It is an excellent invention.
第1図は高炉解析システムの基本的考え方を示す図、第
2図は高炉内の状況を示す図、第3図は高炉の数式モデ
ルのフローチャートを示す図、第4図は数式モデルで計
算した出力例を示す図、第5図はオールコークスとPC
I操業の融着帯形状を比較した図、第6図、第7図はそ
れぞれ実施例を示す図である。 1:融着帯、1a:融着帯根部、1b:融着帯頂部、
2:レースウェイ、3:羽口。Fig. 1 is a diagram showing the basic concept of the blast furnace analysis system, Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the situation inside the blast furnace, Fig. 3 is a diagram showing a flowchart of a mathematical model of the blast furnace, and Fig. 4 is calculated by the mathematical model. Figure 5 shows an example of output, Figure 5 shows all coke and PC
The figure which compares the cohesive zone shape of I operation, FIG. 6, and FIG. 7 are figures which show an Example, respectively. 1: Cohesive zone, 1a: Root of fusion zone, 1b: Top of fusion zone,
2: Raceway, 3: Tuyere.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 昭57−70209(JP,A) 特開 昭56−136906(JP,A) 特開 昭55−110706(JP,A) 特開 昭51−151209(JP,A) 特開 昭51−50807(JP,A) 特公 昭52−724(JP,B2) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of front page (56) Reference JP-A-57-70209 (JP, A) JP-A-56-136906 (JP, A) JP-A-55-110706 (JP, A) JP-A-51- 151209 (JP, A) JP-A-51-50807 (JP, A) JP-B-52-724 (JP, B2)
Claims (1)
した高炉数式モデルによってシミュレートした融着帯の
位置および形状を炉内の測定ゾンデで得られた情報で検
証し、鉱石還元分布、ガス温度分布、圧力分布、融着帯
形状の差が生じた場合ガス拡散係数、ガス境膜伝熱抵
抗、炉芯の空間率、および装入物降下速度分布をパラメ
ーターとして差異を修正し、実炉における最適な融着帯
の位置・形状を探索し、適度な中心流が発達した逆V型
を理想形として、装入物分布条件および送風条件を調整
して最適操業条件を見い出し、実炉に適用する高炉の操
業方法。1. The position and shape of the cohesive zone simulated by a blast furnace mathematical model in which the flow, reaction, and heat transfer in the furnace are simultaneously analyzed, and the position and shape of the cohesive zone are verified by the information obtained from the measurement sonde in the furnace to reduce ore. When there is a difference in distribution, gas temperature distribution, pressure distribution, and cohesive zone shape Correct the differences using the gas diffusion coefficient, gas film heat transfer resistance, core porosity, and charge descent rate distribution as parameters. , Searching for the optimum position and shape of the cohesive zone in the actual furnace, finding the optimum operating condition by adjusting the charge distribution condition and the blast condition, assuming that the inverted V type with an appropriate central flow developed is ideal Blast furnace operating method applied to actual furnace.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP21773585A JPH062886B2 (en) | 1985-09-30 | 1985-09-30 | Blast furnace operation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP21773585A JPH062886B2 (en) | 1985-09-30 | 1985-09-30 | Blast furnace operation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS6277414A JPS6277414A (en) | 1987-04-09 |
| JPH062886B2 true JPH062886B2 (en) | 1994-01-12 |
Family
ID=16708927
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP21773585A Expired - Lifetime JPH062886B2 (en) | 1985-09-30 | 1985-09-30 | Blast furnace operation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH062886B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103697696A (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2014-04-02 | 钢铁研究总院 | Experimental device and experimental method for simulating solid, liquid and gas three-phase running of blast furnaces |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6119416B2 (en) * | 2013-05-16 | 2017-04-26 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | How to charge the blast furnace |
| JP6311482B2 (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2018-04-18 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Estimation method of gas flow rate and reduction load of blast furnace block. |
| CN118983558B (en) * | 2024-08-01 | 2025-05-02 | 常州厚丰新能源有限公司 | Recovery method and recovery system for waste battery negative electrode waste |
-
1985
- 1985-09-30 JP JP21773585A patent/JPH062886B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103697696A (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2014-04-02 | 钢铁研究总院 | Experimental device and experimental method for simulating solid, liquid and gas three-phase running of blast furnaces |
| CN103697696B (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2015-11-25 | 钢铁研究总院 | Analog blast furnace solid-liquid-gas three phase running experiment device and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS6277414A (en) | 1987-04-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mio et al. | Modeling of solid particle flow in blast furnace considering actual operation by large-scale discrete element method | |
| JP3033466B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6248550B2 (en) | How to determine blast furnace operating conditions | |
| JP5387066B2 (en) | Blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation method, blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation device, and blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation program | |
| JPH062886B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP2727563B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| CN111828956A (en) | Method for acquiring circulating multiplying power of CFB boiler material and separation efficiency of separator | |
| JPS6361367B2 (en) | ||
| Qi et al. | Simulation of gas–solid flow in sinter vertical cooling furnace: TF Qi et al. | |
| CN116705178A (en) | A method, device, medium and equipment for determining the blast furnace reflow zone | |
| Adanez et al. | Determination of coal combustion reactivities by burnout time measurements in a batch fluidized bed | |
| Panjkovic et al. | Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Iron Flow and Heat Transfer in the Iron Blast Furnace Hearth | |
| JPS5850290B2 (en) | Sonde for measuring electrical resistance of contents in reduction melting furnace | |
| EP0914476B1 (en) | Apparatus for keeping optimal penetration depth formed at front end of oxygen tuyere and method for keeping the same | |
| JPH06299215A (en) | Operation of blast furnace | |
| JPH0627284B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP2020147824A (en) | Reactor for simulating blast furnace cohesive zone | |
| Sinha et al. | Prediction of burning rate of coal in fluidized-bed combustion | |
| JP2931502B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| RU2229074C1 (en) | Method for controlling pellets roasting process on conveying machine | |
| RU2025495C1 (en) | Method to check heat exchange in a blast furnace | |
| CN121206866A (en) | An apparatus and method for detecting internal operating indicators of a vertical shaft furnace. | |
| JPH01191713A (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JPS624442B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0987710A (en) | Low Si Blast Furnace Operating Method |