JPS6277414A - Operating method for blast furnace - Google Patents

Operating method for blast furnace

Info

Publication number
JPS6277414A
JPS6277414A JP21773585A JP21773585A JPS6277414A JP S6277414 A JPS6277414 A JP S6277414A JP 21773585 A JP21773585 A JP 21773585A JP 21773585 A JP21773585 A JP 21773585A JP S6277414 A JPS6277414 A JP S6277414A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
furnace
shape
distribution
blast furnace
cohesive zone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP21773585A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH062886B2 (en
Inventor
Mamoru Inoue
衞 井上
Yutaka Oda
豊 小田
Takashi Sugiyama
喬 杉山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP21773585A priority Critical patent/JPH062886B2/en
Publication of JPS6277414A publication Critical patent/JPS6277414A/en
Publication of JPH062886B2 publication Critical patent/JPH062886B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。
(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、高炉操業方法に関するものである。[Detailed description of the invention] [Industrial application field] The present invention relates to a blast furnace operating method.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

高炉の操業において炉内の通気性が最も重要な課題の一
つであり、この通気性確保には融着帯と呼ばれる鉱石が
軟化・融着している領域を適正な形状に保持することが
必要とされてい乞。このため従来より操業中に融着帯を
検知し、操業解析に活用する方法が種々提案されている
。例えば、特開昭50−53203号公報に示されるよ
うに炉内径方向数ケ所に水平ゾンデを挿入して測定した
炉内のガス温度、ガス成分を数式モデルに代入して解き
融着帯位置を検知する方法がある。又、特公昭53−1
9’216号公報に示されるように高炉炉頂よりコーク
ス−鉄鉱石類−鉄鉱石類−コークスのごとく、通常の交
互装入ではなく、二回続けて装入した鉄鉱石類を通過す
る炉内ガスの圧力変化を検出し、装入から該圧力変化を
検出するまでの降下時間を計算して融着帯頂部を検出す
る方法がある。さらに特公昭57−52925号公報に
示されるように高炉炉壁高さ方向の複数ケ所それぞれに
ついて炉壁温度を測定してその平均値の統計処理により
融着帯根部を検知する方法等がある。
Air permeability inside the furnace is one of the most important issues in the operation of a blast furnace, and to ensure this air permeability, it is necessary to maintain the cohesive zone, the area where the ore is softened and fused, in an appropriate shape. Begging to be needed. For this reason, various methods have been proposed for detecting the cohesive zone during operation and utilizing it for operation analysis. For example, as shown in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 50-53203, the gas temperature and gas components in the furnace measured by inserting horizontal probes at several locations in the radial direction of the furnace are substituted into a mathematical model and solved to calculate the cohesive zone position. There is a way to detect it. Also, Special Public Service No. 53-1
As shown in Publication No. 9'216, iron ore is charged twice in succession from the top of the blast furnace, instead of the usual alternate charging, such as coke - iron ore - iron ore - coke. There is a method of detecting the top of the cohesive zone by detecting the pressure change of the internal gas and calculating the falling time from charging until the pressure change is detected. Furthermore, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 57-52925, there is a method of measuring the furnace wall temperature at a plurality of locations in the height direction of the blast furnace wall and detecting the root of the cohesive zone by statistical processing of the average value.

【発明が解決しようとする問題点〕[Problem that the invention attempts to solve]

従来の技術は種々の検出端を駆使して炉内を把握するこ
とに重点が置かれており、現象論的に問題をとらえ、解
決手段をケースバイケースで考えてゆ(という手法が中
心であった。一方、高炉内反応をモデル化して数式モデ
ルを組み立て、シミュレーションしてゆくという理論的
なアプローチも近年の計算機の発達によってかなり進歩
した。
Conventional technology has focused on understanding the inside of the reactor by making full use of various detection ends, and has focused on the method of understanding problems phenomenologically and considering solutions on a case-by-case basis. On the other hand, the theoretical approach of modeling the reactions inside a blast furnace, constructing a mathematical model, and performing simulations has also made considerable progress due to the development of computers in recent years.

しかしながら高炉内では流動・伝熱・反応と複雑に現象
が絡み合っており、多くの未知数を仮定して問題を解く
必要があり、実際の炉況をシミュレートしていない場合
も少なイない。かくして、高炉内を精度よく推定し、制
御してやるためには、検出端を活用した高精度の現象把
握能力と、理論的に裏付けされた推定モデルとを有機的
に結合し、一長一短のあるそれぞれの技術を補完し、な
おかつ従来法にない精度と広範囲に応用できる解析シス
テムが望まれる。本発明は測定ゾンデで得られた情報と
高炉数式モデルを組み合わせて最適な融着帯の位置およ
び形状を求めて操業する方法を提供するものである。
However, inside a blast furnace, phenomena such as flow, heat transfer, and reactions are intricately intertwined, and it is necessary to solve problems by assuming many unknown variables, and there are many cases where actual furnace conditions are not simulated. In this way, in order to accurately estimate and control the inside of a blast furnace, it is necessary to organically combine the ability to grasp phenomena with high precision using the detection end and a theoretically supported estimation model, and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each. There is a need for an analysis system that complements technology and can be applied to a wide range of areas with accuracy not found in conventional methods. The present invention provides a method for determining the optimum position and shape of the cohesive zone by combining information obtained by a measurement sonde and a blast furnace mathematical model.

〔問題点を解決するための手段〕[Means for solving problems]

本発明による高炉操業方法の構成は、炉内の流動、反応
、および伝熱を同時解析した高炉数式モデルによってシ
ミュレートした融着帯の位置および形状を炉内の測定ゾ
ンデで得られた情報で検証し、鉱石還元分布、ガス温度
分布、圧力分布、融着帯形状の差が生じた場合、ガス拡
散係数、ガス境膜伝熱抵抗、炉芯の空間率、および装入
物降下速度分布をパラメーターとして差異を修正し、実
炉における最適な融着帯の位置・形状を探索し適度な中
心流が発達した逆v型を理想形として、装入物分布条件
および送風条件を調整して最適操業条件を見い出し、実
炉に通用することを特徴とする高炉の操業方法である。
The configuration of the blast furnace operating method according to the present invention uses information obtained from a measurement sonde inside the furnace to simulate the position and shape of the cohesive zone using a blast furnace mathematical model that simultaneously analyzes flow, reaction, and heat transfer inside the furnace. If there are differences in the ore reduction distribution, gas temperature distribution, pressure distribution, or cohesive zone shape, the gas diffusion coefficient, gas film heat transfer resistance, core porosity, and charge descent rate distribution should be verified. By correcting the differences in parameters and searching for the optimal position and shape of the cohesive zone in an actual furnace, an inverted V shape with a moderately developed central flow was set as the ideal shape, and the burden distribution conditions and air blowing conditions were adjusted to optimize it. This is a blast furnace operating method that is characterized by finding operating conditions and applying it to actual furnaces.

高炉数式モデルは第3図に示すように、高炉内の装入物
分布、ガス流れ、固体流れ、反応、伝熱を同時解析する
もので、以下の方法で順次計算を進め、融着帯形状が収
束するまで計算をくり返すことを特徴としている。
As shown in Figure 3, the blast furnace mathematical model simultaneously analyzes the charge distribution, gas flow, solid flow, reaction, and heat transfer in the blast furnace. It is characterized by repeating calculations until it converges.

高炉への原料装入方法は、鉱石とコークスを交互に層状
に装入し半径方向の鉱石重量/コークス重量および粒度
分布を制御することによってガス流分布を適正に配分し
ている。このときの鉱石・コークスの傾斜角はガス流速
を考慮して小さくし、落下点を中心に装入体積分だけ積
み上げる方式をとった。次にこの炉頂における装入面形
状を初期値として、装入物固体の流れを単純なピストン
流れとして計算する。第2図に示されるように鉱石は融
着帯1で収縮し、ついには液体として滴下するものとし
た。ガスの流れは前記固体流れとは逆方向であり、羽口
3より吹き込まれ通気性の悪い融着帯1を経由して炉頂
から排出される。高炉シャフト部でのガス流れはErg
unが示した充填層の圧力損失と流速の関係を使用した
The method of charging raw materials into a blast furnace is to charge ore and coke alternately in layers and to control the ore weight/coke weight and particle size distribution in the radial direction, thereby appropriately distributing the gas flow distribution. At this time, the angle of inclination of the ore and coke was made small in consideration of the gas flow velocity, and a method was adopted in which the ore and coke were piled up by the charging volume around the falling point. Next, using this charging surface shape at the top of the furnace as an initial value, the flow of the charge solid is calculated as a simple piston flow. As shown in FIG. 2, the ore was assumed to shrink in the cohesive zone 1 and finally drip as a liquid. The gas flow is in the opposite direction to the solid flow, and is blown through the tuyere 3 and discharged from the top of the furnace via the cohesive zone 1, which has poor air permeability. The gas flow in the blast furnace shaft is Erg.
The relationship between pressure drop and flow rate of a packed bed shown by UN was used.

gradP= f + G+ f 2 G I G l
    ・”(1)ここで P:圧力      Gニガス質量速度φ:形状係数 
   gc:重力換算係数dp:平均粒子径   μ:
ガス粘性 ε:空間率     ρ8:ガス密度 鉄鋼石の還元反応に関してはほとんどが一段の総括反応
速度式を用いているが、多段逐次で並列的に還元が進行
するとの機構に立脚した多界面反応モデルを採用した。
gradP= f + G+ f 2 G I G l
・”(1) where P: pressure G gas mass velocity φ: shape factor
gc: Gravity conversion coefficient dp: Average particle diameter μ:
Gas viscosity ε: void ratio ρ8: gas density Most reduction reactions in iron ore use a one-stage overall reaction rate equation, but a multi-interfacial reaction model is based on a mechanism in which reduction proceeds in parallel in multiple steps. It was adopted.

融着帯1の位置を決めるのはガス流れ、還元反応ばかり
でなく、ガスと固体間の伝熱メカニズムが最も密接なる
関係があると考えられる。粒子流体間の伝熱係数はRa
nzが充填層について求めた式を基本に垂直ゾンデ等の
測定結果で補正した。
It is thought that the position of the cohesive zone 1 is determined not only by the gas flow and the reduction reaction, but also by the heat transfer mechanism between the gas and the solid. The heat transfer coefficient between particles and fluid is Ra
Based on the equation determined by nz for the packed bed, the equation was corrected using the results of measurements made using a vertical sonde, etc.

hp:粒子流体間の伝熱係数 Kg:ガスの熱伝導度 Prニブラントル数 Rep :粒子レイノズル数 dp:粒子径 Ce:補正項 融着帯1は軟化開始温度と滴下開始温度を、還元率の関
数として与え、前記伝熱メカニズムで計算した温度分布
から形状を推定した。以上の計算を融着帯形状が安定す
るまでくり返し行ない、最後に融着帯形状、温度、還元
分布、ガス流れ、固体流れ等を出力することを特徴とし
ている。
hp: Heat transfer coefficient between particles and fluid Kg: Thermal conductivity of gas Pr Nybrantl number Rep: Particle Raynozzle number dp: Particle diameter Ce: Correction term Cohesive zone 1 is a function of the softening start temperature and dripping start temperature, and the reduction rate. The shape was estimated from the temperature distribution calculated using the heat transfer mechanism. The above calculation is repeated until the cohesive zone shape is stabilized, and finally the cohesive zone shape, temperature, reduction distribution, gas flow, solid flow, etc. are output.

該数式モデルとは別途に、高炉シャフト部において少な
(とも1個のセンサーを炉内装入物中に進入可能に設置
し、該センサーにより炉内のガス温度、ガス成分および
ガス圧力をシャフト上部から融着帯まで連続的に測定す
る。測定手段としては従来から一般に用いられている垂
直ゾンデによって行なうことができ、例えば特開昭59
−16917号公報を用いることによって容易に検出で
きる。次に前記高炉数式モデルを利用して上記で得られ
た該データに基づくガス流分布、鉱石還元率分布、ガス
温度分布、融着帯形状等の炉内状況が再現されるように
以下のように未知パラメーターの設定を実施する。
Separately from this mathematical model, a small number of sensors are installed in the blast furnace shaft so that they can penetrate into the contents of the furnace, and the sensors measure the gas temperature, gas components, and gas pressure in the furnace from the top of the shaft. Continuously measure up to the cohesive zone.Measurement can be carried out using a vertical sonde, which has been commonly used in the past.
It can be easily detected by using JP-A-16917. Next, the blast furnace mathematical model was used to reproduce the furnace conditions such as gas flow distribution, ore reduction rate distribution, gas temperature distribution, cohesive zone shape, etc. based on the data obtained above. Set unknown parameters.

ガス流分布が一致しない場合は、炉芯の空間率係数をθ
〜1まで変化させ、鉱石の還元率分布の場合は、ガスの
拡散律速と考えて拡散係数を同様に0〜1まで振らせる
。ガス温度分布に対しては、同様にガス側の境膜伝熱律
速と考えてガス境膜伝熱抵抗係数を変化させる。このよ
うにして得られた融着帯形状が該データに基づくものと
一致するまで上記の操作をくり返す。第4図に比較結果
を示す。
If the gas flow distributions do not match, change the furnace core void ratio coefficient to θ
In the case of the reduction rate distribution of ore, the diffusion coefficient is similarly varied from 0 to 1, considering that gas diffusion is rate-determining. Regarding the gas temperature distribution, the gas film heat transfer resistance coefficient is changed by considering that the gas film heat transfer rate is similarly determined. The above operations are repeated until the cohesive zone shape thus obtained matches that based on the data. Figure 4 shows the comparison results.

こうして実炉と1対1に対応づけられた高炉数式モデル
を用いて問題解決のために思考実験を計算機を利用して
実施する。つまり、実際に操業アクションを取っても効
果が現われるのは数時間後であり、しかも一度炉況が悪
化するとなかなか回復しないという悪循環をくり返すの
が実体である。
In this way, a thought experiment is carried out using a computer to solve a problem using a blast furnace mathematical model that is in one-to-one correspondence with an actual furnace. In other words, even if operational actions are taken, the effects will only be seen after a few hours, and once the furnace condition worsens, it is difficult to recover, and the reality is that the vicious cycle repeats.

その点計算機を用いたシミュレーションは短時間で効果
が判明し、トラスチックな操業条件に対しても自由に試
すことができる。
In this respect, simulations using a computer can prove their effectiveness in a short period of time, and can be freely tested even under difficult operating conditions.

操業アクションには、主に装入物の分布制御と送風条件
の調整が考えられる。具体的には、鉱石/コークスの半
径方向分布、鉱石・コークスの半径方向粒度分布、送風
温度・送風湿分等を1つあるいはそれ以上組み合わせて
最適操業条件を見つけ出すことになる。最後にシミュレ
ーション結果より最適な操業アクションを採用し、該セ
ンサーによってその効果を確認し、不十分な場合はフィ
ードバックして再度上記操作をくり返す。以上の考え方
を第1図の思考フローにまとめて示した。
The main operational actions that can be considered are charge distribution control and adjustment of air blowing conditions. Specifically, the optimum operating conditions are found by combining one or more of the radial distribution of ore/coke, the radial particle size distribution of ore/coke, the air temperature, air humidity, etc. Finally, the optimal operation action is adopted based on the simulation results, its effectiveness is confirmed by the sensor, and if it is insufficient, feedback is given and the above operation is repeated again. The above ideas are summarized in the thought flow in Figure 1.

本発明方法は通常操業から移行した操業、例えば微粉炭
吹込みのように装入塊コークス量が大幅に低減したり、
あるいは高出銑比操業のように降下速度が大幅に増大し
ボッシュガス量が低下するような場合において大きな効
果を有するものである。
The method of the present invention can be applied to operations that have shifted from normal operations, such as pulverized coal injection, where the amount of lump coke charged is significantly reduced,
Alternatively, it has a great effect in cases where the rate of descent increases significantly and the amount of Bosch gas decreases, such as in high iron production ratio operations.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

実施例1 オールコークス操業から微粉炭吹込み(PCI)操業へ
の移行期に本発明である解析システムを実施した例を以
下に示す。
Example 1 An example in which the analysis system of the present invention was implemented during the transition period from all-coke operation to pulverized coal injection (PCI) operation is shown below.

i粉炭吹込みは羽口3から約1300℃の空気と同時に
微粉炭を吹込む操業であり、炉頂から装入する塊コーク
スの低減および原料炭と一般炭の価格差を狙った高炉操
業法である。第5図に示したように従来のオールコーク
ス操業とPCI操業を比較すると、羽目前の燃焼帯(レ
ースウェイ)2が拡大して熔解能力が増大するので周辺
の鉱石/コークス比を積極的に大きくし、中心ガス流を
保持する操業アクションを取った。これによって融着帯
頂層1bが上昇し、根部1aが低下した形となった。そ
の結果第6図に示すように根部1aが通気変動もなく安
定して低下することによって、溶銑中の(Si)もオー
ルコークス時に比べて早期に約0.1%低下することが
できた。比較のために本発明を使用しない場合の従来の
オールコークス操業からPCI操業への移行を重ねて表
示した。
i Pulverized coal injection is an operation in which pulverized coal is injected from the tuyere 3 at the same time as air at approximately 1300°C, and it is a blast furnace operating method that aims to reduce the amount of lump coke charged from the top of the furnace and to reduce the price difference between coking coal and steam coal. It is. As shown in Figure 5, when comparing conventional all-coke operation and PCI operation, the immediate combustion zone (raceway) 2 expands and the melting capacity increases, so the surrounding ore/coke ratio is actively adjusted. Operational actions were taken to increase and maintain the central gas flow. As a result, the cohesive zone top layer 1b rose and the root portion 1a became lowered. As a result, as shown in FIG. 6, the root portion 1a was lowered stably without any change in ventilation, and the (Si) content in the hot metal was also lowered by about 0.1% earlier than in the case of all coke. For comparison, the transition from conventional all-coke operation to PCI operation without using the present invention is shown in an overlapping manner.

当該解析システムがないため試行錯誤の連続によってや
っと最ati業を見つけ出すことが可能であった。
Since there was no such analysis system, it was only possible to find the best product through trial and error.

実施例2 高炉の改修期間等の増産が必要な場合において、酸素富
化と微粉炭吹込みを併用した高出銑比操業が有効である
。酸素富化率を上昇すると熱流比(固体熱容量/気体熱
容量)が局部的に上昇してガスと固体の伝熱が十分行な
われなくなり、鉱石が未還元状態で滴下するという現象
がレースウェイ直上で誘発される。そこで湿分を上げ、
レースウェイ2の温度を低下させ、ボッシュガス量が増
加する一方、周辺部の鉱石/コークス比率を融着帯根部
1a近傍の還元率が0.9以上になるように低下させた
。その結果第7図に示すように平均出銑比、2.5t/
Dam’  という高出銑比を安定して持続することが
できた。
Example 2 In cases where increased production is required, such as during a blast furnace renovation period, high-output ratio operation using a combination of oxygen enrichment and pulverized coal injection is effective. When the oxygen enrichment rate is increased, the heat flow ratio (solid heat capacity/gas heat capacity) increases locally, and heat transfer between the gas and solid becomes insufficient, resulting in the ore dripping in an unreduced state directly above the raceway. triggered. Then increase the humidity,
The temperature of the raceway 2 was lowered and the amount of Bosch gas was increased, while the ore/coke ratio in the peripheral area was lowered so that the reduction ratio near the cohesive zone root 1a was 0.9 or more. As a result, as shown in Figure 7, the average pig iron production ratio was 2.5t/
It was possible to stably maintain a high pig iron production ratio of Dam'.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

以上詳細に説明した如く本発明法によれば、従来経験の
ない高炉操業法に移行しても安定操業が早期に達成され
、低燃料比、低(Si)操業等に寄与できる高炉操業上
きわめてすぐれた発明である。
As explained in detail above, according to the method of the present invention, stable operation can be quickly achieved even when shifting to a blast furnace operation method for which there has been no prior experience, and it is extremely effective in terms of blast furnace operation, which can contribute to low fuel ratio, low (Si) operation, etc. This is an excellent invention.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は高炉解析システムの基本的考え方を示す図、第
2図は高炉内の状況を示す図、第3図は高炉の数式モデ
ルのフローチャートを示す図、第4図は数式モデルで計
算した出力例を示す図、第5図はオールコークスとPC
I操業の融着帯形状を比較した図、第6図、第7図はそ
れぞれ実施例を示す図である。 1:融着帯、1a:融着帯根部、1b:融着帯頂部、2
ニレ−スウェイ、  3:羽口。 出 願 人  新日本製鐵株式会社 代理人弁理士  青 柳    稔 抑襖 °くロ オールコー7ス撞東 PCI豫業 第5図 第6図 第7図
Figure 1 shows the basic concept of the blast furnace analysis system, Figure 2 shows the situation inside the blast furnace, Figure 3 shows the flowchart of the blast furnace mathematical model, and Figure 4 shows the calculations using the mathematical model. A diagram showing an output example, Figure 5 is all coke and PC
A diagram comparing the cohesive zone shapes of I operation, FIG. 6, and FIG. 7 are diagrams showing examples, respectively. 1: Cohesive zone, 1a: Cohesive zone root, 1b: Cohesive zone top, 2
Elm sway, 3: tuyere. Applicant Nippon Steel Corporation Patent Attorney Aoyagi Aoyagi Fertility Control 7th Edition PCI Yuye Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 炉内の流動、反応、および伝熱を同時解析した高炉数式
モデルによってシミュレートした融着帯の位置および形
状を炉内の測定ゾンデで得られた情報で検証し、鉱石還
元分布、ガス温度分布、圧力分布、融着帯形状の差が生
じた場合ガス拡散係数、ガス境膜伝熱抵抗、炉芯の空間
率、および装入物降下速度分布をパラメーターとして差
異を修正し、実炉における最適な融着帯の位置・形状を
探索し、適度な中心流が発達した逆V型を理想形として
、装入物分布条件および送風条件を調整して最適操業条
件を見い出し、実炉に通用する高炉の操業方法。
The position and shape of the cohesive zone simulated by a blast furnace mathematical model that simultaneously analyzes the flow, reaction, and heat transfer inside the furnace was verified using information obtained from a measurement sonde inside the furnace, and the ore reduction distribution and gas temperature distribution were verified. , when there are differences in pressure distribution and cohesive zone shape, the differences are corrected using parameters such as gas diffusion coefficient, gas film heat transfer resistance, core porosity, and charge descending velocity distribution, and the optimum value for the actual furnace is determined. We searched for the location and shape of the cohesive zone, determined that an inverted V shape with a moderately developed central flow was the ideal shape, and adjusted the burden distribution conditions and air blowing conditions to find the optimal operating conditions and apply it to the actual furnace. How to operate a blast furnace.
JP21773585A 1985-09-30 1985-09-30 Blast furnace operation method Expired - Lifetime JPH062886B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP21773585A JPH062886B2 (en) 1985-09-30 1985-09-30 Blast furnace operation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP21773585A JPH062886B2 (en) 1985-09-30 1985-09-30 Blast furnace operation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6277414A true JPS6277414A (en) 1987-04-09
JPH062886B2 JPH062886B2 (en) 1994-01-12

Family

ID=16708927

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP21773585A Expired - Lifetime JPH062886B2 (en) 1985-09-30 1985-09-30 Blast furnace operation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH062886B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014224291A (en) * 2013-05-16 2014-12-04 新日鐵住金株式会社 Method of charging object to be charged into blast furnace
JP2015028209A (en) * 2013-07-02 2015-02-12 新日鐵住金株式会社 Method for estimating gas flow velocity and reduced load of blast furnace lumpy zone
CN118983558A (en) * 2024-08-01 2024-11-19 常州厚丰新能源有限公司 A recycling method and recycling system for waste battery negative electrode waste

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103697696B (en) * 2013-12-27 2015-11-25 钢铁研究总院 Analog blast furnace solid-liquid-gas three phase running experiment device and method

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014224291A (en) * 2013-05-16 2014-12-04 新日鐵住金株式会社 Method of charging object to be charged into blast furnace
JP2015028209A (en) * 2013-07-02 2015-02-12 新日鐵住金株式会社 Method for estimating gas flow velocity and reduced load of blast furnace lumpy zone
CN118983558A (en) * 2024-08-01 2024-11-19 常州厚丰新能源有限公司 A recycling method and recycling system for waste battery negative electrode waste

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH062886B2 (en) 1994-01-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kuang et al. Review on modeling and simulation of blast furnace
KR101987139B1 (en) Method for detecting air flow distribution in blast furnace
Dong et al. Modelling of multiphase flow in a blast furnace: Recent developments and future work
Mujumdar et al. Modeling of rotary cement kilns: applications to reduction in energy consumption
Dianyu et al. Particle-scale study of coke combustion in the raceway of an ironmaking blast furnace
Hou et al. A transient discrete element method‐based virtual experimental blast furnace model
JP6248550B2 (en) How to determine blast furnace operating conditions
Li et al. Numerical investigation of the inner profiles of ironmaking blast furnaces: effect of throat-to-belly diameter ratio
Zheng et al. Heat transfer characteristics of calcined petroleum coke in waste heat recovery process
JP5387066B2 (en) Blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation method, blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation device, and blast furnace gas flow distribution estimation program
Natsui et al. Analysis on Non‐Uniform Gas Flow in Blast Furnace Based on DEM‐CFD Combined Model
CN114065597A (en) Mathematical method for representing iron ore reflow characteristics in blast furnace reflow zone
Mahiques et al. Simulation of reacting, moving granular assemblies of thermally thick particles by discrete element method/computational fluid dynamics
JPS6277414A (en) Operating method for blast furnace
Dong et al. Modelling of multiphase flow in ironmaking blast furnace
CN104537177B (en) Cohesive zone softening face method for determining position and device in a kind of blast furnace
Gao et al. CFD-DEM simulation of raceway size and mechanical characteristics of industrial scale blast furnace
Liu et al. Optimization of ironmaking blast furnace operations using an integrated mathematical model
Wei et al. Numerical Investigation of the Radial Ore‐to‐Coke Ratio in the Blast Furnace Throat during Nonuniform Burden Descent
JP2727563B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
Qi et al. Simulation of gas–solid flow in sinter vertical cooling furnace: TF Qi et al.
Panjkovic et al. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Iron Flow and Heat Transfer in the Iron Blast Furnace Hearth
JPS6277413A (en) Method for controlling position of welded zone of blast furnace
JP7180467B2 (en) Reactor for simulating blast furnace cohesive zone
Arabi et al. Modeling and simulation of noncatalytic gas-solid reaction in a moving bed reactor