JPH075154A - Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knocking - Google Patents
Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knockingInfo
- Publication number
- JPH075154A JPH075154A JP5146231A JP14623193A JPH075154A JP H075154 A JPH075154 A JP H075154A JP 5146231 A JP5146231 A JP 5146231A JP 14623193 A JP14623193 A JP 14623193A JP H075154 A JPH075154 A JP H075154A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- sound pressure
- sound
- product
- value
- concrete product
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000010079 rubber tapping Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 21
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000251131 Sphyrna Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003014 reinforcing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明はコンクリート製品、例え
ばALC等の内部欠陥の有無を自動検出することを可能
とする判定方法に関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a judging method which makes it possible to automatically detect the presence or absence of internal defects such as concrete products such as ALC.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】コンクリート製品、例えばALC製品等
にあっては、原料の微妙な配合の相違や製造条件の相違
によって、成型後にクラック等の品質不良を生じている
場合がある。このような内部欠陥が存在する場合、所定
の強度が得られず、使用中に破壊して危険な場合も生ず
る。このため品質を管理するために養生後の製品のクラ
ック等の有無を検査する必要を生ずる。従来この種の製
品検査方法としては、人間が製品を打撃し、その打撃の
大きさ及び音色の違いを聴き分ける方法が主に行われて
いる。2. Description of the Related Art In concrete products such as ALC products, quality defects such as cracks may occur after molding due to subtle differences in the raw materials and production conditions. When such an internal defect is present, a predetermined strength cannot be obtained, and it may be destroyed during use, which may be dangerous. Therefore, in order to control the quality, it is necessary to inspect the product after curing for cracks. Conventionally, as this type of product inspection method, a method in which a person hits the product and hears the difference in the magnitude of the hit and the timbre is mainly performed.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】以上のような従来の検
査方法は、人間の官能評価により、判別に個人差があ
り、しかも熱練度を要するため、一定した検査が困難で
ある。また例えば製品を軽打し、その際発生する衝撃音
の周波数の違いによる非破壊検査のような予め全被検査
品に対する絶対的な判定基準をもって欠陥の有無を判定
する方法がある。しかしながら、軽打箇所の表面状態や
被検査品の大きさが多岐にわたるとき、良品部の周波数
の値が大きくばらつき、絶対的な一定の判定基準を設け
ることが難しくその検査精度も低下する。そこで本発明
の目的はコンクリート製品、例えばALC製品内部に気
泡を有する製品の内部欠陥の有無検査として製品を多数
点軽打したときの衝撃音の音圧データを処理し、その判
定基準を製品毎に設定することにより、高い精度をもっ
て内部欠陥の有無を自動判定できる方法を提供すること
にある。In the conventional inspection method as described above, it is difficult to carry out a constant inspection because there is an individual difference in the discrimination by the human sensory evaluation and the degree of heat is required. In addition, there is a method of judging the presence or absence of a defect based on an absolute judgment standard in advance for all inspected products, such as a nondestructive inspection based on a difference in the frequency of impact sound generated at that time. However, when the surface condition of the lightly tapped portion and the size of the inspected product are various, the frequency value of the non-defective part greatly varies, and it is difficult to set an absolutely constant determination standard, and the inspection accuracy thereof also deteriorates. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to process the sound pressure data of impact sound when a large number of products are tapped as a test for the presence or absence of internal defects in concrete products, for example, products having air bubbles inside ALC products, and the judgment criteria are processed for each product. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method capable of automatically determining the presence or absence of an internal defect with high accuracy.
【0004】[0004]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は以上のような目
的を達成するために次のような方法を提供するものであ
る。すなわち、コンクリート製品をハンマーで多数箇所
軽打して、その発生する音の音圧ピーク値を計測し、該
音圧ピーク値の小さい値の複数点の平均値を良部音圧と
し、該良部平均値の所定の許容幅を越えるものを欠陥部
としてコンクリート内部の欠陥の有無を音圧により判定
できるようになされたことを特徴とする打音によるコン
クリート製品良否の自動判定方法である。以上のような
方法は種々の実験の中から発明されたもので同一製品を
多数箇所軽打し、その際発生する衝撃音の音圧の大小及
び製品一枚ごとに判定基準を設けることにより製品内部
の欠陥(クラック)を確実に検出することができた。具
体的には同一コンクリート製品をハンマーで多数箇所軽
打し、その時発生する各箇所の衝撃音の音圧ピーク値を
計測し、この多数箇所の各音圧ピーク値の小さい値の複
数点の平均値を良部音圧値とし、その良部音圧値の1.
5倍〜3.5倍に判定基準を設け、この判定基準を越え
るものを欠陥があると判定するもので換言すれば製品の
平均値を基準として所定の許容幅を越えるものを欠陥が
あるとするものである。そもそも欠陥部と良品部とで音
圧に差が現れることは良品部分の打撃力のほとんどが製
品全体に伝わり、吸収されてしまうのに対して欠陥部分
では打撃力の伝わりがクラック等の空間部で遮断され吸
収分が少なく、その分音として反射するために両者の音
圧に大きな差が現れる。又欠陥部分の音はクラック等の
面全体から発生するのに対して良品部分は打撃した面か
らしか発生しない。この音源の面源か、点源かの違いも
両者の音圧の差を有無原因の1つになっている。ここで
音圧ピーク値の小さい値の複数点の平均値を良部音圧値
とする理由は次の理由による。すなわち前述した如く欠
陥部と良部の音圧とでは欠陥部の方が高いということ、
欠陥は全域になく部分的であること、良部の値は気泡を
内存するALC板では必ずしも一定でない等を考慮し
て、基準値を決めるに当たり良部の音圧の方が小さいこ
とから各点の音圧値の小さい値から複数点をとった平均
値を良部の音圧代表値としたものである。The present invention provides the following method in order to achieve the above objects. That is, a concrete product is tapped at multiple points with a hammer, the sound pressure peak value of the generated sound is measured, and an average value of a plurality of points having small sound pressure peak values is defined as a good part sound pressure. A method for automatically determining the quality of a concrete product by tapping sound is characterized in that the presence or absence of a defect in concrete can be determined by sound pressure, with a defect that exceeds a predetermined permissible width of part average value as a defect. The method described above was invented from various experiments, and the same product was tapped at multiple points, and the sound pressure of the impact sound generated at that time was set and the judgment standard was set for each product. Internal defects (cracks) could be reliably detected. Specifically, tap the same concrete product at multiple points with a hammer, measure the sound pressure peak value of the impact sound at each point generated at that time, and average the multiple points of the small sound pressure peak values at these multiple points. The value is defined as the good part sound pressure value, and the good part sound pressure value is 1.
A criterion is set to 5 times to 3.5 times, and those exceeding this criterion are judged to be defective. In other words, those exceeding a predetermined permissible width based on the average value of the product are defective. To do. In the first place, the difference in sound pressure between the defective part and the non-defective part shows that most of the striking force of the non-defective part is transmitted to the entire product and is absorbed, whereas the transmission of the striking force of the defective part is transmitted to the space part such as a crack. The sound pressure is blocked because of a small difference in absorption, and the sound pressure is reflected as a divided sound, resulting in a large difference in sound pressure between the two. Further, the sound of the defective portion is generated from the entire surface such as a crack, whereas the non-defective portion is generated only from the hit surface. The difference between the surface source and the point source of the sound source is also one of the causes of the difference in sound pressure between the two. The reason why the average value of a plurality of points having a small sound pressure peak value is set as the good part sound pressure value is as follows. That is, as described above, the defective portion is higher in sound pressure between the defective portion and the good portion,
Considering that the defects are partial and not in the whole area, and the value of the good part is not always constant in the ALC plate containing bubbles, the sound pressure of the good part is smaller when determining the reference value. The sound pressure representative value of the good part is an average value obtained by taking a plurality of points from a small sound pressure value of.
【0005】[0005]
【実施例】以下にこの発明の1実施例を図1〜図4を参
照して説明する。図1は本案実施例にかかわる実験装置
の概略構成図である。コンベア(1)を走行してくるA
LC製品(2)への打撃力を一定にするためにエアーシ
リンダの先にハンマーヘッド(3)を取り付けたハンマ
ー装置(4)を用いて打撃面に垂直に打撃する。この打
音をハンマー装置(4)近傍に設置した騒音計(5)で
集音し、騒音部から出力される音圧の大きさに見合った
アナログ交流電圧信号をアナログ/デジタル変換器
(6)でデジタル信号に変換し、パーソナルコンピュー
ター(7)(以下パソコンとする。)に取り込む。パソ
コン(7)で各打撃箇所の音圧ピーク値、良品部の音圧
値、及び判定音圧基準値等を計算し、判定基準値をもっ
て音圧の大小により内部欠陥の有無を自動判定し、画面
に検査結果を表示させる。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of an experimental apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. A traveling on the conveyor (1)
A hammer device (4) having a hammer head (3) attached to the tip of an air cylinder is used to strike the LC product (2) perpendicularly to the impact surface. The tapping sound is collected by a sound level meter (5) installed near the hammer device (4), and an analog AC voltage signal corresponding to the magnitude of sound pressure output from the noise section is converted into an analog / digital converter (6). Convert it into a digital signal and import it into a personal computer (7) (hereinafter referred to as a personal computer). The PC (7) calculates the sound pressure peak value of each hitting point, the sound pressure value of the non-defective part, the judgment sound pressure reference value, etc., and automatically judges the presence or absence of an internal defect based on the sound pressure level with the judgment reference value. Display the inspection result on the screen.
【0006】今、図2に示すような製品角部に内部クラ
ックを有するALC製品に対して、d1 〜d16の点に関
して被検査品の厚さ方向の中央付近を軽打し、各点の音
圧ピークを測定した結果を図3に示す。クラック部分d
1 から発する打音の音圧ピークは、クラックが無い良品
部分に比べ非常に大きく、両者の音圧ピーク比(以降S
/N比とする)が3倍以上もある。このS/N比が大き
いことから、欠陥部分と良品部分との間に基準値を設け
ることが可能となり、この基準値より起きる音圧を発し
た打撃点が有るか無いかを調べることにより欠陥の有無
を判定できる。Now, for an ALC product having internal cracks at the corners of the product as shown in FIG. 2, the points d 1 to d 16 are tapped near the center in the thickness direction of the inspected product, The result of measuring the sound pressure peak of is shown in FIG. Crack part d
The sound pressure peak of the tapping sound generated from 1 is much larger than that of the non-defective product without cracks, and the sound pressure peak ratio of both (hereinafter S
/ N ratio) is three times or more. Since this S / N ratio is large, it becomes possible to set a reference value between the defective portion and the non-defective portion, and it is possible to determine whether or not there is a striking point that emits sound pressure generated from this reference value. The presence or absence of can be determined.
【0007】その判定方法を図4を参照して説明する。
まず一枚の被検査品から得られた多数点の音圧ピーク値
から良品部分となる音圧値を求める。その方法として欠
陥部分の音圧は良品部分に比べ大きいことから多数点の
音圧ピークの値の小さいものから複数点(実施例では全
打撃点の半分)を取り、その平均した値を良品部分の音
圧値(以下良部値)とする。その良部値を表したものが
図4の実線(8)である。次にこの良部値から相対的に
数倍例えば1.5倍〜3.5倍(実施例では良部値から
2倍)の所に判定基準を設定する。すなわち、良部平均
値の所定の許容幅を設定する。この許容幅を表したもの
が図4の破線9である。この許容幅(判定基準値)と各
点の音圧ピーク値とを比較し、許容幅より大きい値を持
つ点があればその測定位置に内部欠陥があることが判断
できる。本実施例においてもクラックがある点d1 の音
圧ピーク値が許容幅よりも大きくなっている。このよう
に被検査品一枚ごとに許容幅を求め、欠陥の有無判定を
行うことによって被検査製品の大きさによる許容幅のば
らつきの影響を受けることなく内部欠陥の有無判定が確
実にできる。The determination method will be described with reference to FIG.
First, a sound pressure value which is a non-defective part is obtained from sound pressure peak values at a large number of points obtained from one piece of the inspected product. As the method, the sound pressure of the defective portion is higher than that of the non-defective portion, and therefore, a plurality of points (half of all striking points in the embodiment) are taken from the one having a small value of the sound pressure peak at many points, and the averaged value is taken. Sound pressure value (hereinafter referred to as the good part value). A solid line (8) in FIG. 4 represents the good part value. Next, a determination standard is set at a location that is relatively several times, for example, 1.5 to 3.5 times (two times from the good part value in the embodiment) from this good part value. That is, a predetermined allowable width of the good part average value is set. A broken line 9 in FIG. 4 represents this allowable width. The allowable width (determination reference value) is compared with the sound pressure peak value at each point, and if there is a point having a value larger than the allowable width, it can be determined that the measurement position has an internal defect. Also in this embodiment, the sound pressure peak value at the point d 1 where there is a crack is larger than the allowable width. In this way, by determining the allowable width for each inspected product and determining the presence / absence of a defect, it is possible to reliably determine the presence / absence of an internal defect without being affected by the variation in the allowable width due to the size of the inspected product.
【0008】図5、図6には本発明打撃検査で検出でき
る欠陥の種類が図示されている。図中(10)はALC
製品、(11)は鉄筋、(12)は断層を示す。何れに
しても本発明は製品の内部欠陥部と良品部との音圧の大
きさの違いを利用し、同一製品を多数打撃して各点の音
圧を騒音計で測定し、各々の音圧ピーク値をパソコンで
計算させる。そして音圧ピーク値全体の30%〜70%
程度の音圧ピーク値の小さい点を平均した値を良部値と
定め、良部値から1.5倍〜3.5倍の所に許容幅を設
定し、この許容幅を越える打撃点があるかないかを計算
させる。このように被検査製品一枚ごとに許容幅を設
け、各点の音圧ピーク値を許容幅をもって監視すること
によって被検査製品の大きさに関わらず製品内部の内部
欠陥の有無を自動判定できる。FIGS. 5 and 6 show the types of defects that can be detected by the impact inspection of the present invention. (10) in the figure is ALC
Product, (11) indicates a reinforcing bar, and (12) indicates a fault. In any case, the present invention utilizes the difference in the sound pressure between the internal defect portion and the non-defective portion of the product, hits the same product multiple times, and measures the sound pressure at each point with a sound level meter. Let the computer calculate the peak pressure value. And 30% to 70% of the total sound pressure peak value
The value obtained by averaging the points with a small sound pressure peak value is defined as the good part value, and the allowable width is set at a place of 1.5 times to 3.5 times from the good part value. Let me calculate if there is it or not. In this way, by setting the allowable width for each inspected product and monitoring the sound pressure peak value at each point with the allowable width, it is possible to automatically determine the presence or absence of internal defects inside the product regardless of the size of the inspected product. .
【0009】[0009]
【発明の効果】本発明はコンクリート製品をハンマーで
多数箇所軽打してその発生する音の音圧ピーク値を計測
し、音圧ピーク値の小さい値の複数点の平均値を良部音
圧とし、良部平均値の所定の許容幅を越えるものを欠陥
部としてコンクリート内部の欠陥の有無を音圧により判
定するもので、被検査製品の大きさに関わらず製品の欠
陥の有無を高い精度をもって自動判定できるという特徴
がある。The present invention measures the sound pressure peak value of the sound generated by tapping a concrete product with a hammer at a number of points, and determines the average value of a plurality of points having a small sound pressure peak value as the sound pressure of the good part. The sound pressure is used to determine the presence or absence of defects inside the concrete, with defects exceeding the prescribed allowable width of the good part average value as defective parts, and the presence or absence of product defects is highly accurate regardless of the size of the inspected product. There is a feature that can be automatically determined by.
【図1】本発明に係わる1実施例の実験装置の概略構成
図FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of an experimental apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
【図2】本発明に係わる1実施例の内部欠陥を有するA
LC製品及び打撃箇所を示す図FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an internal defect of one embodiment according to the present invention.
Diagram showing LC products and hit points
【図3】図2に示すALC製品を打撃したときの各点の
音圧ピーク値を示す図FIG. 3 is a diagram showing sound pressure peak values at various points when the ALC product shown in FIG. 2 is hit.
【図4】本発明に係わる1実施例の内部欠陥判定方法を
示す図FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an internal defect determination method according to one embodiment of the present invention.
【図5】本発明で検出できる欠陥の種類を示す斜面図FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing types of defects that can be detected by the present invention.
【図6】本発明で検出できる欠陥の他の種類のものが示
されたALC製品を切断して示す平面図FIG. 6 is a plan view showing a cut ALC product showing another kind of defects detectable by the present invention.
1 ローラーコンベア 2 ALC製品 3 ハンマーヘッド 4 ハンマー装置 5 騒音計 6 アナログ/デジタル変換器 7 パーソナルコンピューター 8 良品部の音圧値 9 判定基準値 1 Roller conveyor 2 ALC product 3 Hammerhead 4 Hammer device 5 Sound level meter 6 Analog / digital converter 7 Personal computer 8 Sound pressure value of non-defective part 9 Judgment reference value
Claims (1)
軽打してその発生する音の音圧ピーク値を計測し、該音
圧ピーク値の小さい値の複数点の平均値を良部音圧と
し、該良部平均値の所定の許容幅を越えるものを欠陥部
としてコンクリート内部の欠陥の有無を音圧により判定
できるようになされたことを特徴とする打音によるコン
クリート製品良否の自動判定方法。1. A concrete product is tapped at multiple points with a hammer to measure a sound pressure peak value of a sound generated from the concrete product, and an average value of a plurality of points having a small sound pressure peak value is defined as a good part sound pressure, A method for automatically determining the quality of a concrete product by tapping sound, wherein the presence or absence of a defect inside concrete can be determined by sound pressure with a defect portion exceeding a predetermined permissible width of the good portion average value as a defect portion.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5146231A JPH075154A (en) | 1993-06-17 | 1993-06-17 | Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knocking |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5146231A JPH075154A (en) | 1993-06-17 | 1993-06-17 | Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knocking |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH075154A true JPH075154A (en) | 1995-01-10 |
Family
ID=15403079
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5146231A Withdrawn JPH075154A (en) | 1993-06-17 | 1993-06-17 | Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knocking |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH075154A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008063954A (en) * | 2006-09-05 | 2008-03-21 | Tsurumi Mfg Co Ltd | Drainage pump abnormality diagnosis method and apparatus |
| JP2010169465A (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2010-08-05 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Defect detection method and defect detection device of structure |
| CN114705571A (en) * | 2022-06-07 | 2022-07-05 | 常州凯度机电有限公司 | Testing device for impact resistance of turbine blade |
-
1993
- 1993-06-17 JP JP5146231A patent/JPH075154A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008063954A (en) * | 2006-09-05 | 2008-03-21 | Tsurumi Mfg Co Ltd | Drainage pump abnormality diagnosis method and apparatus |
| JP2010169465A (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2010-08-05 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Defect detection method and defect detection device of structure |
| CN114705571A (en) * | 2022-06-07 | 2022-07-05 | 常州凯度机电有限公司 | Testing device for impact resistance of turbine blade |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2003046544A3 (en) | Method to characterize material using mathematical propagation models and ultrasonic signal | |
| CN113567242B (en) | A method for testing the resistance of reinforced concrete or prestressed concrete beams | |
| JPS5920980B2 (en) | How to automatically set the monitoring period for ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| JP5208625B2 (en) | How to determine the quality type of a structure | |
| CA2201229C (en) | Nondestructive inspection method of polymer insulator and apparatus for performing the same | |
| JPH075154A (en) | Method for automatically deciding pass/fail of concrete product by knocking | |
| JPH0392758A (en) | Product inspection | |
| JPS6358124A (en) | Impact type structural change detector | |
| US20030167845A1 (en) | Defect identification in bodies consisting of brittle material | |
| JP2025143634A (en) | Non-destructive evaluation method and system for upper surface thickened deck slabs | |
| JPH0616030B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of article | |
| JPH04320958A (en) | Method for inspecting product acoustically | |
| JP2839831B2 (en) | Destruction detection method and destruction detection device by AE sound | |
| JP3236865B2 (en) | Excitation mode identification method | |
| JPS61161449A (en) | Method for measuring peeling state of wall tile of the like | |
| JPS6229023B2 (en) | ||
| JP2734282B2 (en) | Percussion equipment for building finishing materials | |
| KR102642156B1 (en) | A reference block for nondestructive testing and the sensitivity calibration method of using the same | |
| Bayer et al. | Early detection of fatigue damage through ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation—Part II: Experimental | |
| JP2024125596A (en) | Hammering test result output device and hammering test result output method | |
| JP7701208B2 (en) | Automatic assessment system for the deterioration of anchor bolts | |
| JPH06258302A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| JP4538928B2 (en) | Crystal grain size abnormality judgment device and crystal grain size abnormality judgment method | |
| CN121476388A (en) | An apparatus and method for evaluating the quality grade of round steel using ultrasonic testing. | |
| KR920000879B1 (en) | Failure prediction test method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A300 | Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 20000905 |