JPH09105652A - Automatic sensory inspection method for articles - Google Patents

Automatic sensory inspection method for articles

Info

Publication number
JPH09105652A
JPH09105652A JP7261659A JP26165995A JPH09105652A JP H09105652 A JPH09105652 A JP H09105652A JP 7261659 A JP7261659 A JP 7261659A JP 26165995 A JP26165995 A JP 26165995A JP H09105652 A JPH09105652 A JP H09105652A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sensory
article
data
determined
characteristic curve
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP7261659A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Fumiaki Fukunaga
文昭 福永
Yoshikazu Sudou
芳数 須藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP7261659A priority Critical patent/JPH09105652A/en
Publication of JPH09105652A publication Critical patent/JPH09105652A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】 【課題】 物品を官能検査して良否判定する際、官能セ
ンサによって検出したアナログデータによる官能特性曲
線を単に2値化して良否判定する場合、外乱の影響を受
け易く、外部振動による雑音により誤判定してしまい、
物品異常とノイズとを判別出来ず、検査の信頼性が低下
する点である。 【解決手段】 官能検査によって物品の良否を判定する
にあたり、官能センサにより検出したアナログデータに
よる物品の官能特性曲線Aを画像処理し、画像分解能に
応じた分割本数でXY軸方向にそれぞれ座標分割して上
記アナログデータをデジタル化する工程と、デジタル化
した上記アナログデータのXY各座標データを、対応す
る良品の基準データと比較して両データの一致度をファ
ジィ推論により判定し、その全座標に亘る判定より上記
官能特性曲線Aの良否を判定し、併せて物品の良否を判
定する工程とを含む。
(57) Abstract: When an article is subjected to a sensory inspection to determine whether it is good or bad, when a sensory characteristic curve based on analog data detected by a sensory sensor is simply binarized to determine whether it is good or bad, it is easily affected by external disturbances. I made an erroneous decision due to noise caused by vibration,
This is the point that the abnormality of the article cannot be discriminated from the noise and the reliability of the inspection is lowered. When determining the quality of an article by a sensory test, an image of a sensory characteristic curve A of the article based on analog data detected by a sensory sensor is image-processed, and the coordinates are divided in the XY axis directions by the number of divisions according to the image resolution. And digitizing the analog data with each other, and comparing the XY coordinate data of the digitized analog data with the corresponding reference data of non-defective product, the degree of coincidence between the two data is determined by fuzzy inference, and all the coordinates are determined. The quality of the above-mentioned sensory characteristic curve A is determined by the determination over time, and the quality of the article is also determined.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、官能検査によって
物品の良否を判定する物品の自動官能検査方法に関する
ものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an automatic sensory inspection method for articles, which is used to judge the quality of the article by sensory inspection.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】製品等の物品を官能検査し、それが良品
であるか又は不良品であるか良否を判定する技術的手段
が知られている。上記判定手段は、振動、音圧、荷重セ
ンサ等の官能センサにより官能検査を行ってアナログデ
ータを検出した後、それを比較器内蔵の制御器で2値化
して物品の良否を判定するものである。例えば、図4に
示すように、官能センサにより検出したアナログデータ
による物品の官能特性曲線(G)(NG)をしきい値
(T)でハイ、ロウのデジタル信号に2値化する。そこ
で、特性曲線(G)に示すように、しきい値(T)を越
える部分が検出されなければ、良品データと判定する一
方、特性曲線(NG)に示すように、しきい値(T)を越
える部分(Na)(Nb)を検出した場合、不良品データと
判定する。
2. Description of the Related Art There is known a technical means for sensory-testing an article such as a product to determine whether the article is a good article or a defective article. The above-mentioned judging means judges whether the article is good or bad by performing a sensory test by a sensory sensor such as a vibration, sound pressure or load sensor to detect analog data, and then binarizing it by a controller with a built-in comparator. is there. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, a sensory characteristic curve (G) (NG) of an article based on analog data detected by a sensory sensor is binarized into a high and low digital signal at a threshold value (T). Therefore, as shown in the characteristic curve (G), if no portion exceeding the threshold value (T) is detected, it is determined as good product data, while as shown in the characteristic curve (NG), the threshold value (T) is determined. If a portion (Na) (Nb) that exceeds is detected, it is determined as defective product data.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】解決しようとする課題
は、官能センサによって検出したアナログデータによる
官能特性曲線を単に2値化して良否判定する場合、外乱
の影響を受け易く、外部振動による雑音により誤判定
し、例えば良品を不良品と判定することがあり、物品異
常とノイズとを判別出来ず、検査の信頼性が低下する点
である。そこで、本発明は、官能検査によって物品を良
否判定する際、物品異常とノイズとを判別して外乱の影
響を受け難くした物品の自動官能検査方法を提供するこ
とを目的とする。
The problem to be solved is that, when the sensory characteristic curve based on the analog data detected by the sensory sensor is simply binarized to determine whether it is good or bad, it is easily affected by disturbance, and noise due to external vibration causes This is a point in which an erroneous determination may be made, for example, a non-defective product may be determined to be a defective product, and the product abnormality and noise cannot be discriminated, and the reliability of the inspection decreases. Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide an automatic sensory inspection method for an article that is less susceptible to the influence of disturbance when it is judged whether the article is good or bad by a sensory test, by discriminating between an abnormality of the article and noise.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、官能検査によ
って物品の良否を判定するにあたり、官能センサにより
検出したアナログデータによる物品の官能特性曲線を画
像処理し、画像分解能に応じた分割本数でXY軸方向に
それぞれ座標分割して上記アナログデータをデジタル化
する工程と、デジタル化した上記アナログデータのXY
各座標データを、対応する良品の基準データと比較して
両データの一致度をファジィ推論により判定し、その全
座標に亘る判定より上記官能特性曲線の良否を判定し、
併せて物品の良否を判定する工程とを含むことを特徴と
する。
According to the present invention, in determining the quality of an article by a sensory test, the sensory characteristic curve of the article based on the analog data detected by the sensory sensor is image-processed, and the number of divisions is determined according to the image resolution. A step of digitizing the analog data by dividing coordinates in the XY axis directions, and XY of the digitized analog data
Each coordinate data is compared with the corresponding non-defective reference data to determine the degree of coincidence of both data by fuzzy inference, and the quality of the sensory characteristic curve is determined by the determination over all the coordinates,
In addition, the method further includes the step of determining the quality of the article.

【0005】[0005]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明に係る物品の自動官能検査
方法の実施の形態を図1(a)(b)〜図3を参照して
以下に説明する。まず図1(a)に示すように、振動、
音圧、荷重等の官能センサによって物品を自動的に官能
検査してアナログデータを検出し、それにより物品の官
能特性曲線(A)を描く。次に、図1(b)に示すよう
に、画像処理装置により特性曲線(A)を画像処理し、
画像分解能に応じた分割本数、例えば512本でXY軸
方向(但し、X方向を横軸、Y方向を縦軸とする。)に
それぞれ座標分割してアナログデータによる官能特性曲
線(A)をデジタル化する。そこで、分割した座標毎に
特性曲線(A)のXY座標データ(Xn、Yn)(但し、n=1
〜512)を取り出す。そして、X座標データ(Xn)にお
いて物品の官能特性値を示すY座標データ(Yn)と、同
じX座標データ(Xn)における予め設定した良品の基準
データ(An)とを比較し、例えば両データの差(Qn=Yn-
An)を算出する。或いは、差(Qn)を基準データ(An)
で除算して差(Qn)のパーセント値を算出して基準化し
ても良い。そこで、その差(Qn)に基づいて座標毎にX
Y座標データ(Xn、Yn)と基準データ(Xn、An)との一致
度(Vn)をファジィ推論の例えば重心演算により判定す
る。更に、512個の全XY座標に亘るファジィ判定よ
り官能特性曲線(A)の良否を判定し、併せて物品の良
品又は不良品の良否を判定する。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION An embodiment of an automatic sensory inspection method for articles according to the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1 (a) and (b) to FIG. First, as shown in FIG.
A sensory sensor such as sound pressure or load automatically performs sensory inspection of the article to detect analog data, thereby drawing a sensory characteristic curve (A) of the article. Next, as shown in FIG. 1B, the characteristic curve (A) is image-processed by the image processing device,
The sensory characteristic curve (A) based on analog data is digitally divided by the number of divisions according to the image resolution, for example 512, in the XY axis directions (where the X direction is the horizontal axis and the Y direction is the vertical axis). Turn into. Therefore, for each of the divided coordinates, the XY coordinate data (Xn, Yn) of the characteristic curve (A) (where n = 1
Take out ~ 512). Then, in the X coordinate data (Xn), the Y coordinate data (Yn) indicating the sensory characteristic value of the article is compared with the preset reference data (An) of the good product in the same X coordinate data (Xn). Difference of (Qn = Yn-
An) is calculated. Alternatively, the difference (Qn) is used as the reference data (An)
It is also possible to divide by and calculate the percentage value of the difference (Qn) for standardization. Therefore, X is calculated for each coordinate based on the difference (Qn).
The degree of coincidence (Vn) between the Y coordinate data (Xn, Yn) and the reference data (Xn, An) is determined by fuzzy inference, for example, by calculating the center of gravity. Further, the quality of the sensory characteristic curve (A) is determined by the fuzzy determination over all 512 XY coordinates, and the quality of the good or defective article is also determined.

【0006】この時、上記ファジィ推論におけるアルゴ
リズムは、例えば官能特性曲線(A)のXY座標データ
(Xn、Yn)と基準データ(Xn、An)との差(Qn)が小さけ
れば、一致度(Vn)が大きくなって物品の官能検査特性
曲線(A)は予め設定された良品の基準データ曲線に近
付き、又、差(Qn)が大きければ、一致度(Vn)が小さ
くなって基準データ曲線からずれるものとする。そこ
で、上記アルゴリズムに従って次に示すファジィルール
を作成する。
At this time, if the difference (Qn) between the XY coordinate data (Xn, Yn) of the sensory characteristic curve (A) and the reference data (Xn, An) is small, the algorithm in the above fuzzy reasoning has a degree of coincidence ( Vn) becomes large and the sensory test characteristic curve (A) of the article approaches the preset reference data curve of non-defective product. Also, if the difference (Qn) is large, the degree of coincidence (Vn) becomes small and the reference data curve It should deviate from it. Therefore, the following fuzzy rules are created according to the above algorithm.

【0007】(I)IF Qn(n=1…)=ZR(Zero)、THEN
Vn(n=1…)=PL(Positive Large) (II)IF Qn(n=1…)=PS(Positive Small)、THEN V
n(n=1…)=PS (III)IF Qn(n=1…)=PM(Positive Medium)、THEN
Vn(n=1…)=ZR 又、ファジィルールを実行するためのメンバーシップ関
数として、図2に示すように、三角形のメンバーシップ
関数(Ma)(Mb)を設定する。上記メンバーシップ関数
(Ma)は入力部(%値)に関し、メンバーシップ関数
(Mb)は出力部(一致度)に関するものである。そこ
で、例えば、入力データとしてQn=5% とすると、適合
度はルール(I)で0.5、ルール(II)で0.5、それ以外
で0となる。従って、重心演算により出力(一致度)
(Vn)は2付近となって基準データにかなり近くなる。
上記演算を全XY座標に亘って行ない、官能特性曲線
(A)の良否を判定し、併せて物品の良否を判定する。
(I) IF Qn (n = 1 ...) = ZR (Zero), THEN
Vn (n = 1 ...) = PL (Positive Large) (II) IF Qn (n = 1 ...) = PS (Positive Small), THEN V
n (n = 1 ...) = PS (III) IF Qn (n = 1 ...) = PM (Positive Medium), THEN
Vn (n = 1 ...) = ZR As a membership function for executing the fuzzy rule, triangular membership functions (Ma) (Mb) are set as shown in FIG. The membership function (Ma) is for the input part (% value), and the membership function (Mb) is for the output part (coincidence). Therefore, for example, if Qn = 5% as the input data, the goodness of fit is 0.5 for rule (I), 0.5 for rule (II), and 0 otherwise. Therefore, output by the center of gravity calculation (coincidence)
(Vn) is around 2 and is quite close to the reference data.
The above calculation is performed over all XY coordinates to determine the quality of the sensory characteristic curve (A), and also determine the quality of the article.

【0008】又、ファジィ推論の際、上記重心演算によ
る判定の他、確率による判定手段もある。例えば、図3
に示すように、X座標データ(Xn)(但し、n=1〜512)
におけるY座標データ(Yn)のファジィ集合のメンバー
シップ関数(Mc){但し、(ZRa)は基準データ、(PS
a)(NSa)は位置ずれの各ファジィ集合}、及び判定確
率(Dn)をそれぞれ座標毎に512個、設定する。そこ
で、例えば、X座標データ(Xn)におけるY座標データ
(特性値)(Yn)の基準データ及び位置ずれに対する各
適合度(Ra)(Rb)を検知する。そして、適合度(Ra)
が大きい程、又、適合度(Rb)が小さい程、基準データ
に近付くため、それらを判定確率(Dn)と比較し、例え
ば、Ra>Dn>Rbの時、Y座標データ(Yn)、即ち特性値
は正常と判定し、その判定作業を各座標毎に512回行
なう。そこで、512個の全判定結果から例えば正常判
定回数、或いは全特性値の適合度(Ra)(Rb)の乗算値
等を判断基準として判定し、上記同様、官能特性曲線
(A)の良否を判定し、併せて物品の良否を判定する。
Further, in fuzzy reasoning, there is a determination means based on probability in addition to the determination based on the above-described center of gravity calculation. For example, FIG.
As shown in, X coordinate data (Xn) (however, n = 1 to 512)
Membership function (Mc) of fuzzy set of Y coordinate data (Yn) in (where (ZRa) is reference data, (PS
a) (NSa) is each position shift fuzzy set}, and 512 determination probabilities (Dn) are set for each coordinate. Therefore, for example, the reference data of the Y coordinate data (characteristic value) (Yn) in the X coordinate data (Xn) and each suitability (Ra) (Rb) for the positional deviation are detected. And the goodness of fit (Ra)
Is larger and the smaller the fitness (Rb) is, the closer to the reference data. Therefore, they are compared with the determination probability (Dn). For example, when Ra>Dn> Rb, Y coordinate data (Yn), that is, The characteristic value is determined to be normal, and the determination work is performed 512 times for each coordinate. Therefore, for example, the number of normal determinations or the product of the goodness of fit (Ra) (Rb) of all characteristic values or the like is determined as a determination criterion from all the 512 determination results, and the quality of the sensory characteristic curve (A) is determined in the same manner as above. The quality of the article is also determined.

【0009】[0009]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、官能検査によって物品
の良否を判定する際、官能センサによって検出したアナ
ログデータによる官能特性曲線を画像処理し、画像分解
能に応じた本数、例えば512本でXY軸方向に座標分
割してデジタル化し、デジタル化したアナログデータの
XY各座標データを、対応する良品の基準データと比較
して両データの一致度をファジィ推論により判定し、そ
の全座標に亘る判定より官能特性曲線の良否を判定し、
併せて物品の良否を判定したから、外乱に影響され難
く、物品異常とノイズとを判別出来て誤判定がなく、
又、官能特性曲線をXY軸方向にそれぞれ512分割し
てデータを取り出しているため、検査の信頼性が向上す
る。
According to the present invention, when the quality of an article is judged by the sensory inspection, the sensory characteristic curve based on the analog data detected by the sensory sensor is image-processed, and the number of lines corresponding to the image resolution, for example, XY is used. The coordinates are divided in the axial direction and digitized, and each XY coordinate data of the digitized analog data is compared with the corresponding reference data of a non-defective product, and the degree of coincidence between the two data is determined by fuzzy inference, and determination is made over all the coordinates. Judge the quality of the sensory characteristic curve more,
In addition, since the quality of the article is determined, it is difficult to be affected by disturbance, and it is possible to distinguish between the article abnormality and the noise and there is no erroneous determination,
Further, since the sensory characteristic curve is divided into 512 in the XY axis directions and the data is taken out, the reliability of the inspection is improved.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】(a)は本発明に係る物品の自動官能検査方法
の実施の形態を示すアナログデータによる物品の官能特
性曲線のグラフである。(b)は図1(a)のグラフの
XY軸方向のデジタル分割を示すグラフである。
FIG. 1A is a graph of a sensory characteristic curve of an article by analog data showing an embodiment of an automatic sensory inspection method for an article according to the present invention. FIG. 1B is a graph showing digital division of the graph of FIG. 1A in the XY axis directions.

【図2】本発明に係る物品の自動官能検査方法のファジ
ィ推論を実施するための入出力部の各メンバーシップ関
数の波形図である。
FIG. 2 is a waveform diagram of each membership function of the input / output unit for performing fuzzy inference of the automatic sensory inspection method for articles according to the present invention.

【図3】本発明に係る物品の自動官能検査方法のファジ
ィ推論を実施するための他のメンバーシップ関数の波形
図である。
FIG. 3 is a waveform diagram of another membership function for implementing fuzzy inference in the automatic sensory inspection method for articles according to the present invention.

【図4】従来の物品の自動官能検査方法の一例を示すア
ナログデータによる物品の官能特性曲線のグラフであ
る。
FIG. 4 is a graph of a sensory characteristic curve of an article by analog data showing an example of a conventional automatic sensory inspection method for an article.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

A 官能特性曲線 A sensory characteristic curve

フロントページの続き (51)Int.Cl.6 識別記号 庁内整理番号 FI 技術表示箇所 G06F 15/70 455A Continuation of front page (51) Int.Cl. 6 Identification code Office reference number FI Technical display area G06F 15/70 455A

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 官能検査によって物品の良否を判定する
にあたり、 官能センサにより検出したアナログデータによる物品の
官能特性曲線を画像処理し、画像分解能に応じた分割本
数でXY軸方向にそれぞれ座標分割して上記アナログデ
ータをデジタル化する工程と、デジタル化した上記アナ
ログデータのXY各座標データを、対応する良品の基準
データと比較して両データの一致度をファジィ推論によ
り判定し、その全座標に亘る判定より上記官能特性曲線
の良否を判定し、併せて物品の良否を判定する工程とを
含むことを特徴とする物品の自動官能検査方法。
1. When determining the quality of an article by a sensory test, the sensory characteristic curve of the article based on the analog data detected by the sensory sensor is image-processed, and the coordinates are divided in the XY axis directions by the number of divisions according to the image resolution. And digitizing the analog data with each other, and comparing the XY coordinate data of the digitized analog data with the corresponding reference data of non-defective product, the degree of coincidence between the two data is determined by fuzzy inference, and all the coordinates are determined. A method of automatically sensory inspecting an article, comprising the step of determining pass / fail of the above-mentioned sensory characteristic curve through determination over time, and also determining pass / fail of the article.
JP7261659A 1995-10-09 1995-10-09 Automatic sensory inspection method for articles Pending JPH09105652A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7261659A JPH09105652A (en) 1995-10-09 1995-10-09 Automatic sensory inspection method for articles

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7261659A JPH09105652A (en) 1995-10-09 1995-10-09 Automatic sensory inspection method for articles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH09105652A true JPH09105652A (en) 1997-04-22

Family

ID=17364986

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP7261659A Pending JPH09105652A (en) 1995-10-09 1995-10-09 Automatic sensory inspection method for articles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH09105652A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117423225A (en) * 2023-10-23 2024-01-19 东华理工大学 A disaster remote sensing early warning system based on high-speed railway operation

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117423225A (en) * 2023-10-23 2024-01-19 东华理工大学 A disaster remote sensing early warning system based on high-speed railway operation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111965246B (en) A scraper machine fault detection method and its detection system based on multi-information fusion
US6470300B1 (en) Method and system for detecting and localizing sensor defects in motor vehicles
EP3862829B1 (en) State estimation device, system, and manufacturing method
JP7046760B2 (en) Signal analysis device, signal analysis method, and signal analysis program
CN112052714A (en) Data-driven machine learning for modeling aircraft sensors
CN116686005A (en) Analysis device, analysis system, analysis program, and analysis method
US6807288B2 (en) Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and recording medium recording image processing program
JPH09105652A (en) Automatic sensory inspection method for articles
JPH0829540A (en) Earthquake discrimination method
JP2981434B2 (en) Pattern defect detection method and apparatus
JP2890801B2 (en) Surface scratch inspection device
JP2647502B2 (en) Pattern comparison inspection method and apparatus
JPH087104A (en) Pass / fail judgment threshold determination method
JP4775100B2 (en) Signal identification device
JP3151951B2 (en) Function automatic generation device
JPH05322714A (en) Cavitation phenomenon detector
JPH0658298B2 (en) Bearing abnormality diagnosis device
JP3194419B2 (en) Inspection method for wrong parts of engine external parts
JPH1187443A (en) Defect determination method, defect determination device, and computer-readable recording medium storing defect determination program
CN116071347B (en) Wear degree determination method, device, system and storage medium
CN114078227B (en) Intelligent AI recognition alarm system and method
JPH11173956A (en) Quality judgment method and device
JPS62169040A (en) Printed circuit board pattern inspection equipment
JP2508662Y2 (en) Flaw detection device
Avasarala et al. Sensor validation in non-destructive evaluation using clustering

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20020401