JPS6140834Y2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6140834Y2
JPS6140834Y2 JP11505080U JP11505080U JPS6140834Y2 JP S6140834 Y2 JPS6140834 Y2 JP S6140834Y2 JP 11505080 U JP11505080 U JP 11505080U JP 11505080 U JP11505080 U JP 11505080U JP S6140834 Y2 JPS6140834 Y2 JP S6140834Y2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
judo
floor
foam
tatami mats
straw
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP11505080U
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5740544U (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP11505080U priority Critical patent/JPS6140834Y2/ja
Publication of JPS5740544U publication Critical patent/JPS5740544U/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JPS6140834Y2 publication Critical patent/JPS6140834Y2/ja
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Floor Finish (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Description

【考案の詳細な説明】[Detailed explanation of the idea]

本考案は安全性、耐久性に優れるとともに、廉
価でかつ適応性が広い柔道場の床構造に係るもの
である。 従来、柔道場の床は板張り、コンクリート等剛
性の床上に藁を圧縮し縫合した所謂柔道用藁畳を
単に並置した構造のものが一般であつた。 しかし、この構造に成る柔道場の床は、頑丈で
ある反面クツシヨン性が低劣で、このため例えば
受身等に際し人体が感じる痛みが大でまた負傷し
易いという安全面での欠陥をもつものであつた。 これを改良し、人体が受ける衝撃を軽減する手
段として、例えば床をスプリング床とし、該スプ
リング床上に柔道用藁畳を並置することが一部で
行なわれている。 しかしこの構造はスプリング床装置に多大の設
備費用を要するばかりでなく、一たん設置してし
まうと他の運動場への転換が困難で、また既設道
場へ設置することは、床下構造上不可能の場合が
多い。 近時、柔道場床構造の前記した諸問題点を改良
する新しい試みとして実公昭47−3461号公報明細
書でウレタンフオーム板上に発泡スチロール板を
接合した所謂弾基板なるものを先ず床上に敷きつ
め、該弾基板上部に柔道用藁畳を敷きつめる方法
が提案された。 しかしながら、該弾基板中に介在せしめられた
ウレタンフオームは、本来高い柔軟性を有するも
のである。 したがつて板中のウレタンフオーム層が薄層で
あると、上部に柔道用藁畳を載置しただけで該層
が極端に圧縮されてしまうためその衝撃吸収能は
殆んど機能しえないものとなる。またこれに伴つ
て発泡スチロール板の側に負荷される衝撃が過大
となるため、一般に回復性が低く、脆い材質であ
る発泡スチロール板に変形や割れ、崩れが生じ易
く、これに基因して特に使用頻度の高い道場中央
部の畳は沈み、肩落ち、凹みの状態になりがちで
周囲の畳との間に段差を形成し易い。 これはすり足による足送りあるいは足払い技な
ど柔道に常用される動作を行なう際にきわめて危
険である。 また、例えば板中のウレタンフオームが厚目の
層であると、たとえ弾基板相互の突き合せ線と畳
相互の突き合せ線が合致しないように重ねられて
いたとしても、ウレタンフオーム本来の柔軟性に
因つて運動に伴なう床の振動が烈しくこれに伴つ
て畳間に瞬間的な段差を生じ易い。しかもこの考
案は、二種の発泡体を接合しなければならない加
工上の複雑さと、弾基板相互の突き合せ線と畳相
互の突き合せ線が合致しないように配置すること
が不可欠という施工上の難点を併有するものであ
る。 本考案は運動によつて生ずる床の揺動が少く畳
間に段差を生ぜず、しかも衝撃吸収能のよい、優
れた安全性と耐久性を有する柔道場の床構造を提
供することを目的とする。 本考案の第2の目的は、板張り床、コンクリー
ト床およびそれらのスプリング組込みの有無を問
わず、従つて新設はいうまでもなく既設の改造に
もまた他会場を利用した臨設の場合にも好適に適
応できる加工並びに施工が簡単で価格が低廉な、
安全性の高い柔道場の床構造を提供することであ
る。 すなわち本考案はASTMD1596−69T法に準拠
して得られた動的衝撃特性曲線の最適応力値が
0.04〜0.15Kg/cm2の範囲内にあつてかつ最小衝撃
値が50G以下に属し、更にJISK6767法に準拠して
得られた繰り返し圧縮残留歪の値が10%以下であ
るポリオレフイン発泡体が柔道場の床上に敷設さ
れ、該発泡体上面に柔道用藁畳が載置された柔道
場の床構造を要旨とするものである。 以下、本考案を添付図面に拠つて説明する。 第1図は本考案において柔道用藁畳の下敷とし
て用いるポリオレフイン発泡体が具備すべき動的
衝撃特性の範囲を説明するグラフである。 本考案が選用するポリオレフイン発泡体は
ASTMD1596−69T法に準拠して策定された後述
する動的衝撃特性(全面圧縮)の試験方法に従つ
て求められた動的衝撃特性曲線の最適応力値が
0.04〜0.15Kg/cm2の範囲内にあつて、かつ最小衝
撃値が50G以下のものである。 従つて第1図中に例示されるイ,ロ……ホ,ヘ
の6個の動的衝撃特性曲線のうち、点線および矢
印で示された区域に最適応力値を有するイ,ロ,
ハのポリオレフイン発泡体が本考案の条件を充足
する。 本考案に用いられるポリオレフイン発泡体は上
記条件を充足するとともに、JISK6767の方法に
準拠して策定された後述の試験方法に従つて測定
された繰り返し圧縮残留歪が10%以下にあるもの
である。 本考案が床と柔道用藁畳の間の緩衝介在体とし
て上述した特性を兼備したポリオレフイン発泡体
を選用することは、柔道場の床構造に係る本考案
が前記した目的を果すための不可欠の要件であ
る。すなわち上記諸特性を兼備したポリオレフイ
ン発泡体を柔道用藁畳の下部に敷設することによ
つて畳上の運動により生ずる床の揺動を柔道を行
なうに好適な範囲に抑え、かつ運動者の受身等に
より生ずる烈しい衝撃を発泡体内に吸収せしめて
人体が感じる痛みを柔らげるとともに瞬間的にも
畳間に段差を生ぜしめない、しかも耐久性を有す
る優れた柔道場の床構造を得ることが始めて可能
となるのである。 ここでポリオレフイン発泡体の最適応力値が
0.04Kg/cm2未満例えば第1図の曲線二の如き場合
はその圧縮強度の低劣さに基因して畳上の運動に
よる衝撃により畳間に段差が生じることを避けら
れない。 一方この値が例えば第1図の曲線への如く0.15
Kg/cm2を超えたものであると、発泡体はその高い
圧縮強度に相応してクツシヨン性が不十分である
ため受身等に際して人体が受ける痛みは柔げられ
ない。 また、ポリオレフイン発泡体の最小衝撃値が
50Gを超えた例えば第1図の曲線ホの如きもので
あると、その衝撃吸収能が柔道用藁畳のもつ衝撃
吸収能と大差のないものであるため、ポリオレフ
イン発泡体を緩衝介在体とすることによる衝撃吸
収能増大は期待できない。 ポリオレフイン発泡体の繰り返し圧縮残留歪が
10%以下であることも重要である。 この値が10%を超えるポリオレフイン発泡体を
使用した場合は、柔道場の使用頻度にもよるが該
発泡体に経時的な厚味減少所謂へたりが生じ易
く、これに基因して使用頻度の異る畳間に段差が
発生するため長期使用に耐え得ない。 本考案は第3図に示したように板張り、コンク
リート等の床2上にポリオレフイン発泡体1と柔
道用藁畳3を積重ねたシムプルな構造のものであ
る。尚、図中4は発泡体1と畳3のずれを防止す
るためそれらの周囲を固定する枠を示す。 しかしながらたとえこのようなシムプルな構造
でもそこに用いられたポリオレフイン発泡体が或
る特定の範囲から選ばれたものであるならばそれ
は驚くべきことに安全性、耐久性にすぐれたきわ
めて理想的な柔道場の床を構成する。 本考案はこの従来何びとも予想だになし得なか
つた点に着眼しこれを解明することに成功したも
のである。 本考案の床構造のシムプル性は、本考案におい
てきわめて重要な意味をもつものである。 特定のポリオレフイン発泡体を用いたが故に得
られた優れた柔道場の床構造は、そのシムプル性
によつて適応性が拡大される。 本考案の床構造は板張り床、コンクリート床を
問わずまたスプリング装置の有無を問わないから
新設にも好適である。既設の改造も容易である。
また屋内外を問わず臨時に柔道場を設備すること
も、またそれを取外して復元することも容易であ
る。 しかもポリオレフインの発泡体は市販の板体が
入手容易で、加工は殆んど不必要である上、施工
は簡単で素人でも十分に実施できる。従つて費用
も低廉である。 本考案に用いるポリオレフイン発泡体は20〜80
mmの厚味範囲で用いるのが好ましい。成べくは市
販板体で上記厚味範囲に属するものを利用するの
が賢明である。 また、その広さは大きい程よいが、敷設作業
性、持ち運び容易性等からたて2000〜2600mm×よ
こ500〜600mmが適当である。 次に本考案が用いた各種試験方法を列記する。 1 動的衝撃特性(全面圧縮) ASTMD1596−69T包装用緩衝材料の動的圧
縮試験方法に従い、同一重量のおもりを1分間
隔で連続5回落下させ、1回目を除き2〜5回
目の4個の測定衝撃値の平均を求めて記録し、
さらにおもりの重量を変えて測定し第1図に示
す動的衝撃特性曲線・衝撃値−静的応力を画
く。 最適応力と最小衝撃値 第1図に示す動的衝撃特性曲線・衝撃値−静的
応力で画く曲線の最も低い衝撃値を最小衝撃値
といい、この最小衝撃値を与える静的応力値を
最適応力という。 試験条件 おもりの落下高さ 60cm 供試品厚味 5cm 2 繰り返し圧縮残留歪 JISK6767ポリエチレンフオームの繰り返し
圧縮残留歪試験方法に従い、テスト前後の厚味
の差の割合を残留歪とする。 サンプルサイズは50×50×厚さ約25mm、25%
圧縮を8万回(60回/min)行ない24Hr.放置
後の厚さを測定する。 繰り返し圧縮残留歪=T−T/T×100(%) ただしT1:最初の厚さ T2:試験後の厚さ 3 動的衝撃特性(局部圧縮) ASTMD1596−69T包装用緩衝材料の動的圧
縮試験方法に準じ、ASTMF355ジムマツトの
衝撃特性試験方法が規定する円筒ダミー(面積
129cm2)を使用し、局部圧縮の落下テストを行
ない第2図に示す動的衝撃特性曲線・衝撃値−
静的応力を求める。 試験条件 円筒ダミーの落下高さ 60cm 供試品厚さ 実施例1,2比較例1に詳記 実施例1,2比較例1 従来の柔道場床構造として代表的な板張り床上
に載置した柔道用藁畳を比較例とし、その床と畳
間に第1図の曲線ロの動的衝撃特性を有し、かつ
繰り返し圧縮残留歪が5%のポリエチレン発泡板
を介在させた本考案の床構造を実施例として、そ
れぞれの動的衝撃特性曲線(部分圧縮)を求め
た。 第2図は明細書本文に前掲した試験方法に従つ
て人体頭部を想定した円筒ダミーを使用しこれを
60cmの高さから重量を変えて落下させ各重量毎に
5回実施し1回目の測定値を除いて2〜5回目の
値の平均値をブロツトして得たものである。 図中曲線トは床上に柔道用藁畳を載置した比較
例1、曲線チはその床と畳の間に25.9mm厚味のポ
リエチレン発泡板を介在させた実施例1、曲線リ
は実施例1の発泡板を53.1mm厚味とした実施例2
である。 尚、実施例、比較例に用いた柔道用藁畳は汎用
品でいずれも62.6mm厚味のものであつた。 第2図で明らかなように、曲線チ,リは曲線ト
に比較してすべての静的応力点において衝撃値が
低下したものとなつている。 これは曲線チ,リをもたらすに至つた実施例の
床構造が、曲線トをもたらした比較例の床構造よ
りも、あらゆる衝撃に対しすぐれた衝撃吸収能力
を発揮すること、ひいて安全性が格段に高いこと
を如実に示すものである。 実施例3 比較例2〜9 柔道3段以上の有段者5名に委嘱して、柔道場
の各種床構造を対象として、その安全性、耐久
性、加工性、施工性、費用、適応性の各項につい
て評価しかつそれらの総合評価を実施した。これ
を第1表に示す。 対象とした床構造は次の9種類である。 実施例3;本考案に係るもので板張り床上に第
1図曲線ハの動的衝撃特性を有し繰り返し圧縮残
留歪が10%のポリエステル発泡体50mm厚味のもの
を敷き、その上部に柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を載置 比較例2;板張り床上に第1図曲線ニの動的衝
撃特性を有し、繰り返し圧縮残留歪が7%のポリ
エチレン発泡体50mm厚味のものを敷きその上部に
柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を載置 比較例3;板張り床上に第1図曲線への動的衝
撃特性を有し繰り返し圧縮残留歪が5%のポリエ
チレン発泡体50mm厚味のものを敷き、その上部に
柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を載置 比較例;板張り床上に第1図曲線ホの動的衝撃
特性を有し繰り返し圧縮残留歪が7%のポリエチ
レン発泡体50mm厚味のものを敷き、その上部に柔
道用藁畳60mm厚味を載置 比較例5;板張り床上に第1図曲線ハに類似の
動的衝撃特性を有するが、その繰り返し圧縮残留
歪が15%のポリエチレン発泡体50mm厚味のものを
敷き、その上部に柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を載置 比較例6;スプリングを組込んだ板張り床上に
柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を敷設 比較例7;板張り床上に柔道用藁畳60mm厚味を
敷設 比較例8;板張り床上に、30mm厚味の柔道用藁
畳と30mm厚味のポリウレタン発泡体が接合された
合成柔道畳を敷設 比較例9;板張り床上に、ポリスチレン発泡体
とポリウレタン発泡体を各25mm厚味で接合した弾
基板をポリスチレン側を上面にして敷き、その上
部に弾基板相互の突き合せ線と柔道用藁畳相互の
突き合せ線が合致しないように柔道用藁畳を載置 尚、評価基準は次の通りで記号〇は良、△は
可、×は不良を示す。
The present invention relates to a floor structure for a judo hall that is not only safe and durable, but also inexpensive and has a wide range of adaptability. Conventionally, the floor of a judo hall has generally been constructed by simply placing judo straw tatami mats made of compressed and sewn straw on a rigid floor such as board or concrete. However, although the floor of a judo hall with this structure is strong, it has poor cushioning properties, and as a result, it has flaws in terms of safety, such as the pain felt by the human body when performing Ukemi, etc., and the possibility of injury. Ta. As a means to improve this and reduce the impact that the human body receives, some methods have been used, for example, to use a spring floor as the floor and to place judo straw tatami mats on the spring floor. However, this structure not only requires a large amount of equipment cost for the spring floor device, but once it is installed, it is difficult to convert it to another playground, and it is impossible to install it in an existing dojo due to the structure under the floor. There are many cases. Recently, as a new attempt to improve the above-mentioned problems in the floor structure of judo halls, as disclosed in the specification of Publication of Utility Model Publication No. 47-3461, a so-called bullet substrate made by bonding a polystyrene board to a urethane foam board was first laid on the floor. A method was proposed in which judo straw mats were spread over the bullet board. However, the urethane foam interposed in the bullet substrate inherently has high flexibility. Therefore, if the urethane foam layer in the board is a thin layer, simply placing judo straw tatami on top of the board will cause the layer to be extremely compressed, making its shock absorption ability almost impossible. Become something. In addition, as a result of this, the impact applied to the Styrofoam board becomes excessive, so the Styrofoam board, which is a brittle material with generally low recovery properties, is easily deformed, cracked, and crumbled. The tatami mats in the center of the dojo, where the height is high, tend to sink, sag, and dent, creating a difference in level between the tatami mats and the surrounding tatami mats. This is extremely dangerous when performing movements commonly used in judo, such as suriashi leg feeds or foot sweep techniques. In addition, if the urethane foam in the board is a thick layer, for example, even if the butt lines between the bullet boards and the butt lines between the tatami mats do not match, the urethane foam's original flexibility will be affected. As a result, the floor vibrates violently as a result of the movement, which tends to cause instantaneous differences in level between the tatami mats. Moreover, this idea was difficult due to the complexity of processing, which requires joining two types of foam, and the necessity of arranging the mats so that the butt lines between the bullet boards and the butt lines between the tatami mats do not match. This also has its drawbacks. The purpose of this invention is to provide a floor structure for a judo hall that has excellent safety and durability, has little floor shaking caused by exercise, does not create a step between the tatami mats, and has good shock absorption capacity. do. The second purpose of the present invention is that it is suitable for both plank floors, concrete floors, and those with or without springs installed, and is suitable for not only new construction but also remodeling of existing facilities and temporary construction using other venues. It is easy to process and install, and is inexpensive.
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a highly safe floor structure for a judo hall. In other words, the present invention is based on the optimum stress value of the dynamic impact characteristic curve obtained in accordance with the ASTMD1596-69T method.
Judo is a polyolefin foam that is within the range of 0.04 to 0.15Kg/ cm2 , has a minimum impact value of 50G or less, and has a repeated compression residual strain value of 10% or less obtained in accordance with JISK6767 method. The gist of this is a floor structure for a judo hall, which is laid on the floor of the hall, and straw tatami mats for judo are placed on the upper surface of the foam. The present invention will be explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the range of dynamic impact characteristics that the polyolefin foam used as the underlay of straw tatami mats for judo in the present invention should have. The polyolefin foam selected by this invention is
The optimal stress value of the dynamic impact characteristic curve obtained according to the test method for dynamic impact characteristics (full surface compression), which will be described later, was established in accordance with the ASTMD1596-69T method.
It is within the range of 0.04 to 0.15 Kg/cm 2 and has a minimum impact value of 50 G or less. Therefore, among the six dynamic impact characteristic curves A, B...E, and F illustrated in FIG.
The polyolefin foam of C satisfies the conditions of the present invention. The polyolefin foam used in the present invention satisfies the above conditions and has a repeated compression residual strain of 10% or less as measured in accordance with the test method described below, which was formulated in accordance with the method of JISK6767. The selection of polyolefin foam, which has the above-mentioned properties, as a buffering medium between the floor and straw tatami mats for judo is essential for the present invention to achieve the above-mentioned purpose of the floor structure of a judo hall. It is a requirement. In other words, by laying a polyolefin foam that has the above characteristics at the bottom of straw tatami mats for judo, the vibration of the floor caused by movement on the tatami mats can be suppressed to a range suitable for judo, and the passive movement of the athlete can be suppressed. It is possible to obtain an excellent floor structure for a judo hall that absorbs the severe impact caused by such events into the foam, alleviating the pain felt by the human body, and that does not create a momentary difference in level between the tatami mats, and is also durable. It becomes possible for the first time. Here, the optimum stress value for polyolefin foam is
If it is less than 0.04 Kg/cm 2 , for example, as shown in curve 2 in FIG. 1, it is unavoidable that a difference in level between the tatami mats will occur due to the impact caused by the movement on the tatami mat due to its low compressive strength. On the other hand, this value is, for example, 0.15 as shown in the curve in Figure 1.
If it exceeds Kg/cm 2 , the cushioning properties of the foam are insufficient in proportion to its high compressive strength, and the pain experienced by the human body during passive activities cannot be alleviated. Additionally, the minimum impact value of polyolefin foam is
For example, when the load exceeds 50G, such as curve E in Figure 1, the shock absorption capacity is not much different from that of straw tatami mats for judo, so polyolefin foam is used as the cushioning medium. We cannot expect an increase in shock absorption capacity due to this. Repeated compression residual strain of polyolefin foam
It is also important that it is 10% or less. If a polyolefin foam with this value exceeding 10% is used, the foam is likely to lose its thickness over time, so-called sagging, depending on the frequency of use at the judo hall, and due to this, the frequency of use may be reduced. It cannot withstand long-term use because there is a difference in level between the different tatami mats. As shown in FIG. 3, the present invention has a simple structure in which polyolefin foam 1 and judo straw tatami mats 3 are stacked on a floor 2 made of board or concrete. In addition, 4 in the figure indicates a frame that fixes the foam 1 and the tatami mat 3 around them in order to prevent them from shifting. However, even with such a simple structure, if the polyolefin foam used therein is selected from a certain range, it is surprisingly safe and durable, making it an extremely ideal judo product. Configure the floor of the venue. The present invention focused on this point, which no one had ever predicted before, and succeeded in elucidating it. The simple property of the floor structure of the present invention is extremely important in the present invention. The superior judo hall floor structure obtained through the use of specific polyolefin foams has increased flexibility due to its simplicity. The floor structure of the present invention is suitable for new construction regardless of whether it is a board floor or a concrete floor, and whether or not a spring device is installed. Modification of existing facilities is also easy.
In addition, it is easy to temporarily set up a judo hall either indoors or outdoors, and it is also easy to remove and restore it. Moreover, commercially available plates of polyolefin foams are easily available, almost no processing is required, and construction is simple and can be carried out satisfactorily even by an amateur. Therefore, the cost is also low. The polyolefin foam used in this invention is 20 to 80
It is preferable to use a thickness in the range of mm. If possible, it is wise to use a commercially available board that falls within the above thickness range. Further, the larger the area, the better, but from the viewpoint of ease of installation and portability, 2000 to 2600 mm in height x 500 to 600 mm in width is appropriate. Next, various test methods used in the present invention are listed. 1 Dynamic impact properties (full surface compression) According to the dynamic compression test method for packaging cushioning materials ASTMD1596-69T, weights of the same weight were dropped 5 times in a row at 1-minute intervals, excluding the 1st time and 4 times from 2nd to 5th times. Find and record the average of the measured impact values of
Further, measurements were taken while changing the weight of the weight, and the dynamic impact characteristic curve/impact value-static stress shown in Figure 1 was drawn. Optimum stress and minimum impact value The lowest impact value on the dynamic impact characteristic curve shown in Figure 1 - impact value - static stress curve is called the minimum impact value, and the static stress value that gives this minimum impact value is the optimum value. It's called stress. Test conditions Weight drop height 60cm Sample thickness 5cm 2 Repeated compression residual strain According to the JISK6767 Repeated Compression Residual Strain Test Method for Polyethylene Foam, the ratio of the difference in thickness before and after the test is the residual strain. Sample size is 50 x 50 x thickness approx. 25mm, 25%
Compression is performed 80,000 times (60 times/min) and the thickness is measured after being left for 24 hours. Repeated compression residual strain = T 1 - T 2 /T x 100 (%) where T 1 : Initial thickness T 2 : Thickness after test 3 Dynamic impact properties (local compression) ASTMD1596-69T of packaging cushioning material According to the dynamic compression test method, the cylindrical dummy (area
129cm 2 ), a local compression drop test was performed, and the dynamic impact characteristic curve and impact value shown in Figure 2 were obtained.
Find static stress. Test conditions: Height of drop of cylindrical dummy: 60cm Thickness of sample: Detailed in Examples 1 and 2 Comparative Example 1 Examples 1 and 2 Comparative Example 1 Judo placed on a wooden floor, which is typical of the conventional judo hall floor structure. Using straw tatami as a comparative example, the floor structure of the present invention has a polyethylene foam board interposed between the floor and the tatami that has the dynamic impact characteristics of curve B shown in Figure 1 and has a repeated compression residual strain of 5%. As an example, the dynamic impact characteristic curves (partial compression) of each were determined. Figure 2 shows a cylindrical dummy simulating a human head according to the test method listed above in the main text of the specification.
The test results were obtained by dropping different weights from a height of 60 cm, performing the test five times for each weight, excluding the first measurement value, and blotting the average value of the second to fifth measurements. In the figure, curved line G is Comparative Example 1 in which judo straw tatami mats were placed on the floor, curved line G is Example 1 in which a 25.9 mm thick polyethylene foam board was interposed between the floor and the tatami mats, and curved line G is Example 1. Example 2 where the foam board of 1 was made 53.1mm thick
It is. The judo straw tatami mats used in the Examples and Comparative Examples were general-purpose products with a thickness of 62.6 mm. As is clear from FIG. 2, curves Q and I have lower impact values at all static stress points than curve G. This means that the floor structure of the example, which resulted in curved chips and chips, exhibits better shock absorption ability against all impacts than the floor structure of the comparative example, which resulted in curved chips, and is therefore safer. This clearly shows that it is extremely high. Example 3 Comparative Examples 2 to 9 Five Judo players with 3rd Dan or higher were commissioned to evaluate the safety, durability, workability, construction efficiency, cost, and adaptability of various floor structures for Judo halls. The items were evaluated and their comprehensive evaluation was conducted. This is shown in Table 1. The following nine types of floor structures were targeted. Example 3: A 50 mm thick polyester foam according to the present invention, which has the dynamic impact characteristics of curve C in Figure 1 and a 10% repeated compression residual strain, is laid on a wooden floor, and a judo foam is placed on top of it. A 60 mm thick straw tatami mat was placed on it. Comparative Example 2: A 50 mm thick polyethylene foam having the dynamic impact characteristics shown in curve 2 in Figure 1 and a repeated compression residual strain of 7% was laid on the wooden floor. A 60 mm thick straw tatami mat for judo was placed. Comparative Example 3: A 50 mm thick polyethylene foam with dynamic impact characteristics for the curve shown in Figure 1 and a repeated compression residual strain of 5% was placed on a wooden floor. A 60 mm thick straw tatami mat for judo is placed on top.Comparative example: A 50 mm thick polyethylene foam with the dynamic impact characteristics of curve E in Figure 1 and a repeated compression residual strain of 7% is placed on the wooden floor. A 60 mm thick straw tatami mat for judo is placed on top of it. Comparative Example 5: A 50 mm thick polyethylene foam with dynamic impact characteristics similar to curve C in Figure 1 but with a repeated compressive residual strain of 15% is placed on the wooden floor. Comparative example 6: 60 mm thick straw tatami for judo is laid on a wooden floor with built-in springs. Comparative example 7: Judo straw tatami is placed on a wooden floor. Lay 60mm thick tatami mats Comparative Example 8: Lay synthetic judo tatami made of 30mm thick judo straw tatami and 30mm thick polyurethane foam on a wooden floor Comparative Example 9: Lay polystyrene foam on a wooden floor A bullet board made of 25mm thick polyurethane foam and polyurethane foam is laid with the polystyrene side facing up, and on top of that, a judo mat is placed so that the butt lines between the bullet boards and judo straw tatami mats do not match. Placing straw tatami mats The evaluation criteria are as follows: 〇 means good, △ means good, and × means bad.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 第1表の評価表に示されるように本考案の実施
例3の構造は、柔道場の床構造として必要な6評
価項目のすべてに全く難点が見出せないものであ
つた。 比較例2〜9のうち、特に重要な安全性の項で
良の評価を得たものは比較例6の所謂スプリング
床構造をもつものだけであつた。 しかしこの比較例6も、施工性、費用、適応性
に難点があることを考えると総合的には到底良好
と判定することのできないものであつた。 本考案の柔道場の床構造は上述の構成に成るも
のであるから、例えば受身等に際し人体が感ずる
痛みが柔らげられたとともに長期にわたつて構造
が変形、破損を来さず畳間の段差も発生せずきわ
めて高い安全性を保つことができるものである。 また本考案の床構造はその構造がシムプルが低
廉に施工できるために、道場の新設、既設道場の
改良、他の運動場や会場あるいは屋外等を利用し
た道場の臨設が容易で、前記安全性と綜合してそ
の有用性のきわめて高いものである。
[Table] As shown in the evaluation table in Table 1, the structure of Example 3 of the present invention had no drawbacks in all of the six evaluation items necessary for a floor structure for a judo hall. Among Comparative Examples 2 to 9, only Comparative Example 6, which had a so-called spring bed structure, received a good rating in the particularly important safety aspect. However, considering that Comparative Example 6 also has drawbacks in workability, cost, and adaptability, it could not be judged as being good overall. Since the floor structure of the judo hall of the present invention has the above-mentioned configuration, the pain felt by the human body during, for example, Ukemi is alleviated, and the structure does not deform or break over a long period of time, and the level difference between the tatami mats can be reduced. It is possible to maintain an extremely high level of safety without causing any problems. In addition, the floor structure of the present invention can be constructed at a low cost by simple construction, so it is easy to construct a new dojo, improve an existing dojo, or construct a temporary dojo using another athletic field, venue, or outdoors. All in all, its usefulness is extremely high.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図はポリオレフイン発泡体の動的衝撃曲線
を例示したグラフ。第2図は柔道場床の動的衝撃
曲線を例示したグラフ。第3図は、本考案の柔道
場床構造の正面断面例図である。 1……ポリオレフイン発泡体、2……床、3…
…柔道場用藁畳、4……枠、5……発泡体相互の
突合せ線、6……畳相互の突合せ線。
FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating a dynamic impact curve of a polyolefin foam. Figure 2 is a graph illustrating the dynamic impact curve of a judo hall floor. FIG. 3 is a front cross-sectional view of the judo hall floor structure of the present invention. 1... Polyolefin foam, 2... Floor, 3...
... Straw tatami mats for judo halls, 4... Frame, 5... Butt lines between foams, 6... Butt lines between tatami mats.

Claims (1)

【実用新案登録請求の範囲】[Scope of utility model registration request] ASTM D1596−69T法に準拠して得られた動的
衝撃特性曲線の最適応力値が0.04〜0.15Kg/cm2
範囲内にあつてかつ最小衝撃値が50G以下に属
し、更にJIS K6767法に準拠して得られた繰返し
圧縮残留歪の値が10%以下であるポリオレフイン
発泡体が、柔道場の床上に敷設され、該発泡体上
面に柔道用藁畳が載置された柔道場の床構造。
The optimum stress value of the dynamic impact characteristic curve obtained in accordance with the ASTM D1596-69T method is within the range of 0.04 to 0.15Kg/ cm2 , and the minimum impact value is 50G or less, and in addition, it is in accordance with the JIS K6767 method. A floor structure for a judo hall in which a polyolefin foam having a cyclic compression residual strain value of 10% or less obtained in accordance with the above is laid on the floor of a judo hall, and straw tatami for judo is placed on the top surface of the foam. .
JP11505080U 1980-08-15 1980-08-15 Expired JPS6140834Y2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11505080U JPS6140834Y2 (en) 1980-08-15 1980-08-15

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11505080U JPS6140834Y2 (en) 1980-08-15 1980-08-15

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5740544U JPS5740544U (en) 1982-03-04
JPS6140834Y2 true JPS6140834Y2 (en) 1986-11-20

Family

ID=29476002

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP11505080U Expired JPS6140834Y2 (en) 1980-08-15 1980-08-15

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6140834Y2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5740544U (en) 1982-03-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7735280B2 (en) Shock absorber for sports floor
US4497853A (en) Synthetic turf carpet game playing surface
US4505960A (en) Unitary shock-absorbing polymeric pad for artificial turf
JP4758283B2 (en) Elastic base layer for flooring and method for producing the same
US6742312B2 (en) Shock absorber for sports floor
EP2794257B1 (en) Surface
JP2595468B2 (en) Gymnastics landing mat
US20180073254A1 (en) Floor tile with vibration and shock control
US8931226B2 (en) Shock-absorbing prefabricated wood flooring
US20190263090A1 (en) Building Products and Associated Methods for Providing Contoured and Elevated Features for Artificial Surfaces
US20210301475A1 (en) Polymeric foam material for shock pads in artificial grass systems
JPS6140834Y2 (en)
KR100863295B1 (en) Elastic wood flooring
US4316297A (en) Tumbling floor
EP4067601B1 (en) Flooring-material system
KR102065894B1 (en) Shock absorbing pad for artifical turf or playground
KR102065889B1 (en) Shock absorbing pad for artificial turf or playground
JP2011051219A (en) Shock absorbing member
CN213449311U (en) Wooden shock attenuation floor structure for gymnasium
JP3663560B2 (en) Floor cushioning material and flooring material using the same
JP7637376B2 (en) Floor structure
US12552134B2 (en) Building products and associated methods for providing contoured and elevated features for artificial surfaces
JPH04120358A (en) Floor substratum device
JPH0533470A (en) Acoustic insulating floor member
JP2565449Y2 (en) Floor panel