JPS623298Y2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS623298Y2
JPS623298Y2 JP19870581U JP19870581U JPS623298Y2 JP S623298 Y2 JPS623298 Y2 JP S623298Y2 JP 19870581 U JP19870581 U JP 19870581U JP 19870581 U JP19870581 U JP 19870581U JP S623298 Y2 JPS623298 Y2 JP S623298Y2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
drainage
window frame
window
rubber belt
vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP19870581U
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5897018U (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP19870581U priority Critical patent/JPS5897018U/en
Publication of JPS5897018U publication Critical patent/JPS5897018U/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JPS623298Y2 publication Critical patent/JPS623298Y2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Vehicle Waterproofing, Decoration, And Sanitation Devices (AREA)
  • Window Of Vehicle (AREA)
  • Specific Sealing Or Ventilating Devices For Doors And Windows (AREA)

Description

【考案の詳細な説明】[Detailed explanation of the idea]

本考案はバス等車輌におけるスライド式側窓の
窓枠の排水構造に関するものである。 一般にこの種の排水構造は、窓枠横部材と車体
窓部外板との間に外向き開口状の断面略コ字形空
所部が形成されると共に該空所部の開口面が水切
りゴムベルトで閉塞され、窓枠横部材には水抜き
孔が穿設され、また水切りゴムベルトには水抜き
孔より大きな排水用切欠部が切欠き形成されてな
るものであるが、この構造では降雨時の高速走行
に際し車輌内部とその外部との圧力差により外圧
が排水用切欠部から直接空所部内に導入されて空
所部内に溜つた雨水が水抜き孔を通じて車内に吹
き上げられるという不都合が生じており、この不
都合を解消するために従来では窓枠横部材の裏面
側に水抜き孔用の所謂逆止弁を特別に設けて排水
時には雨水の自重で開かせ走行時には外圧の利用
により閉塞させるようにしている。しかしながら
このような弁を窓枠横部材の水抜き孔周辺に設け
ることはそれだけ余分な部品を要すると共にその
取付けのための作業を行なう必要があつて製作上
高価となつていた。 本考案は上記のような弁を用いることなくして
降雨時における高速走行の際に水抜き孔からの雨
水の吹上げを防止することのできる排水構造を提
供することを目的としており、この目的を達成す
るために本考案は、窓枠横部材側の水抜き孔をそ
の総面積が水切りゴムベルト側の排水用切欠部の
総面積より大きくなるように形成し、それによつ
て窓枠横部材下方の空所部内と車内とを常に等圧
に近い状態に保持しもつて雨水の吹上げを防止す
るようにしたものである。 以下本考案の実施例を図面に基いて説明する。 第1図はバスのスライド式側窓を車外側から見
た正面図を示し、第2図、第3図はその縦断面図
及び横断面図を示している。これらの図において
1は車体窓開口部2に嵌装された窓枠で、上下の
窓枠横部材3,4と左右の窓枠堅部材5,6とに
より構成され、車体窓開口部2は車体内側から外
側へ突出する車体窓部外板7により形成されてい
る。窓枠1を構成している上下横部材3,4と車
体窓部外板7との間には外向き開口状の断面略コ
字形空所部8が窓枠1の周囲に形成され、この空
所部8の開口面は窓枠1外側端に周設された水切
りゴムベルト9で閉塞されている。そして窓枠1
を構成する上下横部材3,4及び左右堅部材5,
6の夫々の板状基部3a,4a,5a,6aの外
側端には溝部3b,4b,5b,6bに水切りゴ
ムベルト9の内周縁部が嵌着され、その外周縁部
は車体窓部外板7に当接させてある。 上記窓枠下横部材4の板状基部4aには水抜き
孔10が数箇所に亘り、例えば該下横部材4の長
手方向における左右両端部位及びその中間部位で
しかも各部位には右端部位を除いて(右端部位は
内側のみ)その内外側2箇所に夫々穿設されてお
り(第4図には左端部位の内外両側2箇所に穿設
された水抜き孔10,10を示す)、一方この窓
枠下横部材4に沿つて延設されている水切りゴム
ベルト9の下端部には排水用切欠部11がその左
右両端部位に夫々切欠開口されており、そして窓
枠下横部材4に穿設された水抜き孔10…はこれ
ら各水抜き孔10の開口面積の総和が水切りベル
ト9下端部に開口した排水用切欠部11,11の
各々の開口面積の総和よりも大きくなるように形
成されている。 また、窓枠1の上下横部材3,4及び左右堅部
材5,6の板状基部3a,4a,5a,6aには
夫々二条のレール3c,3c、4c,4c、5
c,5c、6c,6cが突設されていて各レール
条3c,4c,5c,6cは無端状に延びてお
り、上横部材3側のレール3cと下横部材4側の
レール4cに窓障子12,12が左右方向スライ
ド可能に嵌合されており、更に板状基部3a,4
a,5a,6aの夫々の内側端には取付用フラン
ジ部3d,4d,5d,6dが突設されており、
このフランジ部3d,4d,5d,6dと前記車
体窓部外板7との固着部にシール材13が装着さ
れている。 上記のような窓枠1の排水構造において、降雨
時の排水に際しては下横部材4の板状基部4a上
のレール4cと4cとの間及びレール4cとフラ
ンジ部4dとの間に溜まつた雨水は水抜き孔10
…を通つて該板状基部4a下方の空所部8に溜ま
り、ここに溜まつた雨水は車体窓部外板7の傾斜
面に沿つて水切りゴムベルト9の排水用切欠部1
1,11から車外に排出される。そしてバスが高
速で走行している場合に車外側から強い圧力を受
けても水抜き孔10…の総開口面積が排水用切欠
部11,11のそれより大きくて空所部8内が車
内と等圧に近い状態に保持されているため空所部
8に溜まつた雨水は水抜き孔10…から車内へ吹
き上がることがない。 次に、本考案による窓枠排水構造と、従来の窓
枠排水構造(窓枠横部材側の水抜き孔の総開口面
積が水切りゴムベルト側の排水用切欠部のそれよ
り小さいもの)及び従来の逆止弁付き窓枠排水構
造との比較試験を示す。 a 試験方法 引違窓1760スパン用窓枠(横幅1651mm、縦幅
702mm)4枚、引違窓障子(横幅834mm、縦幅
693mm)2枚を準備し、窓障子を入れ換えるこ
とで4組の引違窓の組合せを作り、下記の様な
〔A〕〜〔D〕の4種類の試験窓とし、そして
各試験窓を減圧装置に取付け、シヤワーテスト
装置との間隔(700mm)を一定とした。減圧装
置の方で圧力を加えることで内外の圧力差がで
きるので水柱差0mmAq、10mmAq、15mmAq、
20mmAqの4段階と前後に傾斜を3度付けた場
合の各々での雨水の浸水、吹き上げ、オーバー
フローの状態を測定した。水量30/min(降
雨量1500mm/H相当)、圧力15mmAqを高速走行
100Km/H相当(仮定)とした。日本高速道路
で一番登坂のきついところで何度あるかを道路
公団で確認し傾斜3度を折り込み試験をした。 〔A〕; 窓枠を構成する下横部材の水抜き孔
下面側に逆止弁を備えた試験窓。 下横部材の内外両側溝沿いの各1箇所に水
抜き孔が設けられ、その総面積は139.3mm2
あり、また排水用切欠部は水切りゴムベルト
下端部の5箇所に設けられ、その総有効面積
は500mm2である。 〔B〕; 試験窓〔A〕から逆止弁を取外した
試験窓で、他の構造はこの試験窓〔A〕と同
じである。 〔C〕; 本考案による排水構造を有する試験
窓。 窓枠を構成する下横部材の内側溝沿いの4
箇所水抜き孔が設けられ、その総面積は
239.7mm2であり、排水用切欠部は水切りゴム
ベルト下端部の2箇所に設けられ、その総有
効面積は80mm2である。 〔D〕; 本考案による排水構造を有する試験
窓であつて、試験窓〔C〕とは水抜き孔の位
置及び面積が多少異なる。即ち下横部材の外
側溝沿いに1箇所、内側溝沿いに2箇所の計
3箇所に水抜き孔が設けられ、その総面積は
208.8mm2であり、そして排水用切欠部につい
ては試験室Cと同じでその総有効面積は80mm2
である。 b 試験結果 試験窓〔A〕〜〔D〕の試験結果を下記の表
−1〜表−4にそれぞれ示す。
The present invention relates to a drainage structure for a window frame of a sliding side window in a vehicle such as a bus. Generally, in this type of drainage structure, an outwardly opening, substantially U-shaped cavity in cross section is formed between the window frame horizontal member and the vehicle window outer panel, and the opening surface of the cavity is covered with a drainage rubber belt. A drainage hole is provided in the horizontal member of the window frame, and a drainage notch larger than the drainage hole is formed in the draining rubber belt. When the vehicle is running, external pressure is introduced directly into the cavity from the drainage cutout due to the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the vehicle, causing the inconvenience that rainwater accumulated in the cavity is blown up into the interior of the vehicle through the drain hole. In order to eliminate this inconvenience, in the past, a so-called check valve for the drain hole was specially installed on the back side of the horizontal member of the window frame, and when draining, it was opened by the weight of rainwater, and when driving, it was closed by using external pressure. There is. However, providing such a valve around the water drain hole in the window frame side member requires additional parts and requires additional work to install, making it expensive to manufacture. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a drainage structure that can prevent rainwater from blowing up from the drainage holes during high-speed driving during rainy weather without using the valves described above. In order to achieve this, the present invention forms the drainage holes on the side of the window frame horizontal member so that the total area thereof is larger than the total area of the drainage notches on the side of the draining rubber belt. The interior of the space and the interior of the vehicle are always maintained in a nearly equal pressure state to prevent rainwater from blowing up. Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows a front view of a sliding side window of a bus as seen from the outside of the vehicle, and FIGS. 2 and 3 show a longitudinal cross-sectional view and a cross-sectional view thereof. In these figures, 1 is a window frame fitted into the vehicle body window opening 2, which is composed of upper and lower window frame horizontal members 3, 4 and left and right window frame rigid members 5, 6. It is formed by a vehicle body window outer plate 7 that protrudes from the inside of the vehicle body to the outside. Between the upper and lower horizontal members 3, 4 that constitute the window frame 1 and the vehicle body window outer panel 7, a space 8 having an outward opening and a substantially U-shaped cross section is formed around the window frame 1. The opening surface of the empty space 8 is closed by a drainage rubber belt 9 provided around the outer edge of the window frame 1. and window frame 1
Upper and lower horizontal members 3, 4 and left and right rigid members 5,
The inner periphery of a draining rubber belt 9 is fitted into the grooves 3b, 4b, 5b, 6b at the outer ends of the plate-like bases 3a, 4a, 5a, 6a, respectively. It is placed in contact with 7. The plate-shaped base 4a of the window frame lower horizontal member 4 has drain holes 10 at several locations, for example, at both left and right ends in the longitudinal direction of the lower horizontal member 4, and at an intermediate location therebetween, and at each location, a right end. (the right end part is only on the inside), and two holes are drilled on the inside and outside of it (Figure 4 shows drain holes 10, 10 drilled in two places on both the inside and outside of the left end part). At the lower end of the draining rubber belt 9 extending along the lower horizontal member 4 of the window frame, drainage notches 11 are cut out at both left and right end portions, and are bored in the lower horizontal member 4 of the window frame. The provided drain holes 10 are formed such that the sum of the opening areas of these drain holes 10 is larger than the sum of the opening areas of the drainage notches 11, 11 opened at the lower end of the drain belt 9. has been done. In addition, two rails 3c, 3c, 4c, 4c, 5 are provided on the plate-like bases 3a, 4a, 5a, 6a of the upper and lower horizontal members 3, 4 and the left and right rigid members 5, 6 of the window frame 1, respectively.
The rails 3c, 4c, 5c, 6c extend endlessly, and the rails 3c on the upper horizontal member 3 side and the rails 4c on the lower horizontal member 4 side have windows. The shoji 12, 12 are fitted so as to be slidable in the left and right direction, and the plate bases 3a, 4
Attachment flanges 3d, 4d, 5d, 6d are protruded from the inner ends of each of a, 5a, and 6a,
A sealing material 13 is attached to the fixed portion between the flange portions 3d, 4d, 5d, and 6d and the vehicle window outer panel 7. In the drainage structure of the window frame 1 as described above, when draining water during rain, water accumulates between the rails 4c and 4c on the plate-like base 4a of the lower horizontal member 4 and between the rail 4c and the flange portion 4d. 10 drainage holes for rainwater
... and collects in the hollow part 8 below the plate-shaped base 4a, and the rainwater collected here is carried along the slope of the outer panel 7 of the vehicle window part 7 to the drainage notch 1 of the draining rubber belt 9.
1 and 11 are ejected from the vehicle. Even when the bus is running at high speed and receives strong pressure from the outside of the vehicle, the total opening area of the drain holes 10 is larger than that of the drainage notches 11, 11, so that the inside of the empty space 8 becomes the inside of the vehicle. Since the pressure is maintained close to equal pressure, rainwater accumulated in the cavity 8 does not blow up into the interior of the vehicle through the drain holes 10. Next, we will discuss the window frame drainage structure according to the present invention, the conventional window frame drainage structure (in which the total opening area of the drain holes on the side member of the window frame is smaller than that of the drainage notch on the drain rubber belt side), and the conventional window frame drainage structure. A comparative test with a window frame drainage structure with a check valve is shown. a Test method Window frame for sliding window 1760 span (width 1651 mm, height width
702mm) 4 sliding window shoji (width 834mm, height
693mm), and replace the window shoji to create four sets of sliding windows, creating four types of test windows [A] to [D] as shown below, and each test window was attached to a decompression device. was installed at a constant distance (700 mm) from the shower test device. By applying pressure with the decompression device, a pressure difference is created between the inside and outside, so the water column difference is 0mmAq, 10mmAq, 15mmAq,
We measured the conditions of rainwater infiltration, blowing up, and overflow at four levels of 20 mmAq and three degrees of inclination at the front and back. Running at high speed with water flow rate of 30/min (equivalent to rainfall of 1500mm/H) and pressure of 15mmAq.
Equivalent to 100km/h (assumed). We checked with the Japan Highway Public Corporation to find out how many times there is the steepest slope on the Japanese Expressway, and we conducted a test on a 3-degree incline. [A]; Test window equipped with a check valve on the lower side of the drain hole in the lower horizontal member that constitutes the window frame. Drainage holes are provided at one location each along the inner and outer grooves of the lower horizontal member, with a total area of 139.3mm 2 , and drainage notches are provided at five locations at the lower end of the drainer rubber belt, so that the total effective The area is 500mm2 . [B]; This is a test window with the check valve removed from the test window [A], and the other structure is the same as this test window [A]. [C]; Test window having a drainage structure according to the present invention. 4 along the inner groove of the lower horizontal member that makes up the window frame
Drain holes are provided in places, and the total area is
239.7 mm 2 , drainage notches are provided at two locations at the lower end of the draining rubber belt, and the total effective area is 80 mm 2 . [D]; A test window having a drainage structure according to the present invention, which is slightly different from the test window [C] in the position and area of the drainage hole. In other words, drainage holes are provided in three locations, one along the outer groove of the lower horizontal member and two along the inner groove, and the total area is
208.8mm 2 , and the drainage notch is the same as in test room C, with a total effective area of 80mm 2
It is. b Test Results The test results for test windows [A] to [D] are shown in Tables 1 to 4 below, respectively.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 c 以上の試験結果より次のようなことが考えら
れる。 表−1と表−2を比較してみる。窓を水平
において状態で水位と吹き上げの有無を例に
とる。水位では表−1より表−2の方が少し
水抜穴より排水が良いことが解かる。吹き上
げの有無を比べると表−1の方が良好であ
る。ここでは逆止弁の効果が大きいことが解
かる。又斜傾3度付けた場合の水位は両方と
も1分以内でオーバーフローする。この状態
では車が高速走行中急ブレーキ、あるいは登
坂、下坂になると水が車内にオーバーフロー
することになる。下横枠前後の両端に水抜き
孔が必要であると考えられる。 表−1と表−3を比較してみる。窓を水平
においた状態で水位と吹き上げの有無を例に
とる。水位では表−1より表−3の方がはる
かに排水が良いことが解かる。吹き上げの有
無を比べると全く同じである。ここでは逆止
弁はあつてもなくても何んら吹き上げには関
係がないことが解かつた。次に傾斜3度付け
た場合の水位を比べると表−3の方が非常に
優れている。ここでは下横枠前後の両端に水
抜き孔を設けたことが非常に効果があつた。
表−1と表−3とでは水抜き孔の総面積と排
水用切欠部の総有効面積が異なる。表−1で
は水抜き孔の総面積が139.3mm2、排水用切欠
部の総有効面積が500mm2であり、表−3では
水抜き孔の総面積が239.7mm2、排水用切欠部
の総有効面積が80mm2である。ここで判断でき
るのは、水抜き孔の総面積が排水用切欠部の
総有効面積より大きければ逆止弁がなくても
高速走行時における雨水の吹き上げ防止が可
能であると考えられることである。 表−1と表−4を比較してみる。窓を水平
においた状態で水位と吹き上げの有無を例に
とる。水位では表−1より表−4の方がはる
かに低く水抜き孔より排水が良好であること
が解かる。これは表−1では外側の圧力が大
きく浸水したものはいつまでも排水しにくい
ことである。吹き上げの有無を比べると両方
とも全く吹き上げがない。傾斜3度付けた場
合の水位を比べても表−4の方がはるかに優
れている。表−4では逆止弁を使用しなくて
も高速走行時の雨水の吹き上げは問題はない
と判断できる。また、逆止弁のない方が排水
が非常に良好である。この違いは水抜き孔の
総面積と排水用切欠部の総有効面積との違い
が大きくでている。 表−3と表−4を比較してみる。窓を水平
においた状態で水位と吹き上げの有無を例に
とる。水位では大差はない。吹き上げの有無
でも全く同じである。傾斜3度付けた場合の
水位を比べるとやはり表−4の方が優れてい
る。水抜き孔の総面積と排水用切欠部の総有
効面積も大差はない。走行中の登坂、下坂に
おいては表−4の方が優れていると判断でき
る。 以上説明したように本考案の排水構造は、窓枠
横部材側の水抜き孔をその総面積が水切りゴムベ
ルト側の排水用切欠部の総面積より大きくなるよ
うに形成しているので、水抜き孔下面側に特別に
逆止弁を設けなくても降雨時における車輌の高速
走行に際し車内への雨水等の吹き上げを防止する
ことができ、従つて逆止弁を装備した従来の排水
構造に比べて窓枠排水装置の製作が容易となつて
コストの低廉化を期することができる。また逆止
弁を設けた場合には弁取付部にゴミ等がたまり易
くそれがために長期使用中には弁機能が損われて
雨水の吹き上げを防止できなくなるが、本考案に
よればそのようなことがなく耐用性の点で非常に
すぐれたものといえる。
[Table] c Based on the above test results, the following can be considered. Let's compare Table-1 and Table-2. Let's take as an example the water level and the presence or absence of blow-up when the window is placed horizontally. Regarding the water level, it can be seen that Table 2 has slightly better drainage than Table 1 than the drain hole. Comparing the presence or absence of blow-up, Table 1 is better. It can be seen that the check valve is highly effective here. Also, when the slope is set at 3 degrees, the water level will overflow within 1 minute in both cases. In this state, if the car brakes suddenly while driving at high speed, or goes up or down a slope, water will overflow into the car. It is thought that drainage holes are required at both ends of the lower horizontal frame. Let's compare Table-1 and Table-3. Let's take as an example the water level and the presence or absence of blow-up when the window is placed horizontally. In terms of water level, it can be seen that Table 3 has much better drainage than Table 1. Comparing the presence and absence of blow-up, they are exactly the same. Here, it was found that whether the check valve was present or not, it had nothing to do with the blow-up. Next, when comparing the water levels when the slope is 3 degrees, Table 3 is much better. Here, providing drainage holes at both ends of the lower horizontal frame was very effective.
Table 1 and Table 3 differ in the total area of the drain holes and the total effective area of the drainage notches. In Table 1, the total area of the drainage holes is 139.3mm 2 and the total effective area of the drainage notches is 500mm 2 , and in Table 3, the total area of the drainage holes is 239.7mm 2 and the total effective area of the drainage notches is 500mm 2 . The effective area is 80mm2 . What can be determined here is that if the total area of the drainage holes is larger than the total effective area of the drainage notches, it is possible to prevent rainwater from blowing up during high-speed driving even without a check valve. . Let's compare Table-1 and Table-4. Let's take as an example the water level and the presence or absence of blow-up when the window is placed horizontally. It can be seen that the water level in Table 4 is much lower than in Table 1, and drainage is better than in the drain holes. This is because in Table 1, if the outside pressure is large and the water is flooded, it will be difficult to drain it forever. Comparing the presence and absence of blow-up, there is no blow-up at all in both cases. Even when comparing the water level when the slope is set at 3 degrees, Table 4 is far superior. From Table 4, it can be determined that there is no problem with rainwater being blown up during high-speed driving even without using a check valve. Also, drainage is much better without a check valve. This difference is largely due to the difference between the total area of the drain holes and the total effective area of the drainage cutouts. Let's compare Table 3 and Table 4. Let's take as an example the water level and the presence or absence of blow-up when the window is placed horizontally. There is no big difference in water level. It is exactly the same whether there is blow-up or not. Comparing the water level when the slope is 3 degrees, Table 4 is superior. There is also not much difference between the total area of the drain holes and the total effective area of the drainage notches. It can be judged that Table 4 is better when climbing and descending hills while driving. As explained above, the drainage structure of the present invention is formed so that the total area of the drainage holes on the side member of the window frame is larger than the total area of the drainage notches on the drainage rubber belt side. Even without installing a special check valve on the bottom side of the hole, it is possible to prevent rainwater from blowing up into the interior of the vehicle when the vehicle is running at high speed during rainy days. As a result, the window frame drainage device can be manufactured easily, and the cost can be expected to be reduced. In addition, when a check valve is installed, dirt and other substances tend to accumulate in the valve mounting part, which impairs the valve function during long-term use and makes it impossible to prevent rainwater from blowing up. It can be said that it has excellent durability without any problems.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

図面は本考案一実施例を示すもので、第1図は
バスのスライド式側窓を車外側から見た正面図、
第2図は第1図の−線断面図、第3図は第1
図の−線断面図、第4図は第1図の−線
拡大断面図、第5図は排水用切欠部を車外側から
見た拡大正面図である。 1……窓枠、2……車体窓開口部、4……窓枠
下横部材、4a……板状基部、7……車体窓部外
板、8……空所部、9……水切りゴムベルト、1
0……水抜き孔、11……排水用切欠部。
The drawings show one embodiment of the present invention, and Figure 1 is a front view of the sliding side window of a bus as seen from the outside of the vehicle;
Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along the - line in Figure 1, and Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of Figure 1.
FIG. 4 is an enlarged sectional view taken along the line - in FIG. 1, and FIG. 5 is an enlarged front view of the drainage notch seen from the outside of the vehicle. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1...Window frame, 2...Vehicle body window opening, 4...Window frame lower horizontal member, 4a...Plate base, 7...Vehicle body window outer plate, 8...Vacancy, 9...Drainer rubber belt, 1
0... Drain hole, 11... Drainage notch.

Claims (1)

【実用新案登録請求の範囲】[Scope of utility model registration request] 窓枠横部材と車体窓部外板との間に外向き開口
状の断面略コ字形空所部が形成されると共に該空
所部の開口面が水切りゴムベルトで閉塞され、上
記窓枠横部材に水抜き孔が、また上記水切りゴム
ベルトに排水用切欠部が夫々設けられてなる車輌
用窓枠の排水構造において、上記窓枠横部材側の
水抜き孔はその総面積が上記水切りゴムベルト側
排水用切欠部の総面積より大きくなるように形成
されたことを特徴とする車輌用窓枠の排水構造。
A hollow space with an outward opening and a substantially U-shaped cross section is formed between the window frame horizontal member and the vehicle window outer panel, and the opening surface of the hollow space is closed with a drainage rubber belt. In the drainage structure of a vehicle window frame, in which a drainage hole is provided in the draining rubber belt, and a drainage notch is provided in the draining rubber belt, the total area of the draining hole on the window frame side member side is larger than the draining hole on the draining rubber belt side. A drainage structure for a vehicle window frame, characterized in that the drainage structure is formed to be larger than the total area of the notch.
JP19870581U 1981-12-24 1981-12-24 Drainage structure for vehicle window frames Granted JPS5897018U (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19870581U JPS5897018U (en) 1981-12-24 1981-12-24 Drainage structure for vehicle window frames

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19870581U JPS5897018U (en) 1981-12-24 1981-12-24 Drainage structure for vehicle window frames

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5897018U JPS5897018U (en) 1983-07-01
JPS623298Y2 true JPS623298Y2 (en) 1987-01-26

Family

ID=30111875

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19870581U Granted JPS5897018U (en) 1981-12-24 1981-12-24 Drainage structure for vehicle window frames

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5897018U (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5897018U (en) 1983-07-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPS6114895Y2 (en)
US5178435A (en) Drain assembly for use on a vehicle
JPH09220932A (en) Structure of weather strip type molding part
JPH019915Y2 (en)
JP3205670B2 (en) Duct entry prevention structure
JPS646327Y2 (en)
JP2514653Y2 (en) Car door drainage structure
KR20260063030A (en) Inner Panel Structure of Vehicle Door Having Attached Hydrophilic Film
JPS607210Y2 (en) Lower water drainage structure for fixed side windows of vehicles
JPH019914Y2 (en)
KR0128308Y1 (en) Car Cowl Panel Structure
KR200189799Y1 (en) Drainage soundproof structure of partition panel of car engine room
JPH09279959A (en) Eaves or throating structure
JPH0116876Y2 (en)
JPH024807Y2 (en)
JP2923645B1 (en) Structure to prevent dirt on building exterior walls
JPH0437783Y2 (en)
JPH0343089B2 (en)
KR100534454B1 (en) Step structure of bus
JPS6342656Y2 (en)
JP2553579Y2 (en) Bus front roof structure
JPH0125699Y2 (en)
JPS5824581Y2 (en) Drainage device for vehicle sliding windows
KR20030015726A (en) A Drain Hose of Automobile Sunroof
JP2000177384A (en) Structure for draining sash for vehicle