JPS6321137B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS6321137B2 JPS6321137B2 JP54050478A JP5047879A JPS6321137B2 JP S6321137 B2 JPS6321137 B2 JP S6321137B2 JP 54050478 A JP54050478 A JP 54050478A JP 5047879 A JP5047879 A JP 5047879A JP S6321137 B2 JPS6321137 B2 JP S6321137B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- oxygen
- sample
- temperature
- oxide
- iron oxide
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
Description
本発明は酸素定量方法に関する。
鋼中の酸素は鋼の機械的性質などに大きな影響
を及ぼし、またその影響は鋼中での酸素の存在状
態、すなわち鋼中酸化物の種類およびそれぞれの
量によつて大きく異なるため鋼中の酸素量をそれ
ぞれの存在状態別に知ることはきわめて有用であ
る。また鋼表面の酸化状況を知る上で鋼表面の酸
化鉄の酸素量を求めることも有用である。
しかるに従来鋼中の酸素定量に用いられている
真空融解法や不活性ガス融解法は次のような難点
を有する。すなわち、単一温度で鋼試料を融解し
て黒鉛により一酸化炭素を生成せしめて抽出する
方法であるため、該試料表面の酸化鉄酸素と該試
料中の酸素との分別ができず酸素の総量しか得ら
れない。また試料表面の酸化鉄量により定量値が
大きく変動する。
これに対しあらかじめ水素ガス中で700℃
10minの加熱により試料表面の酸化物を還元除去
したのち真空融解法により酸素を定量する方法は
知られている(井樋田ら、日本鋼管技報、No.41、
1〜9頁)。しかしこの方法においても試料表面
の酸化鉄の酸素量は求められず試料中の酸素の総
量しか求められない上に表面の還元中一部の酸化
物が分解する場合があるという難点を有する。
また電解や酸溶解あるいはハロゲン−アルコー
ル溶液による溶解などにより化学的に鋼試料中の
酸化物を分離し定量する方法は知られている(成
田、鉄と鋼、第60巻、第13号、1820〜1826頁)。
しかしこの方法は抽出分離時における極微細な酸
化物の溶解やろ過時におけるろ過もれなどにより
定量値に誤差を生ずる上、複雑な操作を必要とし
熟練を要するという難点を有する。
本発明者らはこのような現状に鑑み種々検討を
行なつた結果、酸素の抽出に充分露点を下げた水
素ガスを用いることにより試料表面の酸化鉄の酸
素は170℃以上で定量目的に対し充分な速度で還
元され抽出されること、抽出速度は加熱抽出温度
の上昇とともに増加すること、550℃以下では試
料内部の酸素の抽出は無視でき、したがつて170
℃〜550℃の温度範囲では試料表面の酸化鉄の酸
素のみを抽出し定量することが可能であることを
見出した。また試料表面の酸化鉄酸素のみを170
℃〜550℃の加熱抽出温度範囲で抽出したのちさ
らに高温に加熱したときの試料中の各酸化物の水
素ガスに対する熱的安定性は同一ではなく酸化物
の種類によつて異なる温度で分解し酸素は水とし
て抽出され定量されることを見出した。また試料
表面の付着水は50℃以上で顕著に脱離され150℃
までに脱離されることを見出した。
本発明は以上の知見にもとづいてなされたもの
であり、その要旨とするところは鋼試料を水素気
流中で加熱するに際し加熱抽出温度を170℃〜550
℃の範囲内の所要温度に設定して該試料表面の酸
化鉄の酸素を水として生成せしめて抽出し定量す
る方法、及びしかるのちさらに昇温して該試料中
の酸化物の各分解温度において滞留せしめるかま
たは該温度を通過せしめつつ該酸化物の酸素を水
として生成せしめて抽出しそれぞれ定量すること
を特徴とする酸素定量方法にある。
なお、本発明において水とは水を主体としその
他特に高温で鋼試料中の炭素などとの反応により
生成する少量の一酸化炭素および二酸化炭素を含
むものである。
以下に本発明について詳細に述べる。
まず本発明において鋼試料表面の酸化鉄の酸素
の加熱抽出温度範囲を170℃〜550℃としたのは次
のような実験にもとづくものである。なお以下の
実験においては鋼材を鋸歯あるいはドリルをもち
いて切削しJIS標準ふるいでふるつて100〜200メ
ツシユの一定粒度としたものを試料とし、水素ガ
ス流量は200ml/min、露点−61℃、加熱抽出時
間は2hrとした。水素ガスの露点は加熱抽出温度
や定量精度に大きな影響を及ぼすので、できる限
り低く一定とすることが望ましい。
第1表にその組成を示す鋼試料AおよびBにつ
いて水素気流中で加熱抽出温度を変えて試料表面
の酸化鉄の酸素を定量した結果を第1図に示す。
第1図において横軸は加熱抽出温度、縦軸は酸素
の定量値であり、aは試料Aについての定量結
果、bは試料Bについての定量結果である。第1
図に示す如く170℃未満においては試料表面の酸
化鉄の酸素の抽出反応速度は極度に低下し、定量
目的に適さない。したがつて試料表面の酸化鉄酸
素の定量においては加熱抽出温度を170℃以上に
することが必要である。また同じく第1図に示す
如く550℃以下では試料内部の酸化物分解反応の
影響は受けず試料表面の酸化鉄酸素のみが抽出さ
れ定量されるのに対し、550℃を超えると合金元
素であるSiやMnの酸化物の分解がはじまりこれ
ら酸化物の酸素が試料表面の酸化鉄酸素とあわせ
て抽出され定量されるため試料表面の酸化鉄酸素
のみを定量する上で誤差を生ずる。したがつて試
料表面の酸化鉄酸素の定量においては加熱抽出温
度を550℃以下とすることが必要である。
以上の知見から試料表面の酸化鉄の酸素の定量
には170℃〜550℃の温度範囲が最適である。
The present invention relates to a method for determining oxygen. Oxygen in steel has a large effect on the mechanical properties of steel, and this effect varies greatly depending on the state of existence of oxygen in the steel, that is, the type and amount of each oxide in the steel. It is extremely useful to know the amount of oxygen in each state of existence. It is also useful to determine the amount of oxygen in iron oxide on the steel surface in order to know the oxidation status of the steel surface. However, the vacuum melting method and inert gas melting method conventionally used to quantify oxygen in steel have the following drawbacks. In other words, since the steel sample is melted at a single temperature and carbon monoxide is generated and extracted using graphite, it is not possible to separate the iron oxide oxygen on the surface of the sample from the oxygen in the sample, resulting in a total amount of oxygen. I can only get it. Furthermore, the quantitative value varies greatly depending on the amount of iron oxide on the sample surface. On the other hand, it was heated to 700℃ in hydrogen gas in advance.
There is a known method of reducing and removing oxides on the sample surface by heating for 10 minutes and then quantifying oxygen using a vacuum melting method (Igida et al., Nippon Kokan Giho, No. 41,
(pages 1-9). However, even in this method, the amount of oxygen in the iron oxide on the surface of the sample cannot be determined, only the total amount of oxygen in the sample can be determined, and furthermore, some oxides may be decomposed during the reduction of the surface. In addition, methods for chemically separating and quantifying oxides in steel samples by electrolysis, acid dissolution, or halogen-alcohol solution are known (Narita, Tetsu to Hagane, Vol. 60, No. 13, 1820). ~1826 pages).
However, this method has the disadvantage that it causes errors in quantitative values due to the dissolution of extremely fine oxides during extraction and separation and filtration leakage during filtration, and requires complicated operations and requires skill. The inventors of the present invention have conducted various studies in view of the current situation, and have found that by using hydrogen gas with a sufficiently low dew point for oxygen extraction, the oxygen in iron oxide on the sample surface can be removed for quantitative purposes at temperatures above 170°C. The reduction and extraction rate is sufficient; the extraction rate increases with increasing heating extraction temperature; below 550°C, the extraction of oxygen inside the sample is negligible; therefore, 170°C
We found that in the temperature range from ℃ to 550℃, it is possible to extract and quantify only the oxygen of iron oxide on the sample surface. In addition, only the iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface was
The thermal stability of each oxide in the sample against hydrogen gas when extracted at a heating extraction temperature range of ℃ to 550℃ and then heated to a higher temperature is not the same and decomposes at different temperatures depending on the type of oxide. We found that oxygen can be extracted and quantified as water. In addition, the water adhering to the sample surface is significantly desorbed at temperatures above 50°C.
I found out that it can be removed by The present invention has been made based on the above findings, and its gist is that when heating a steel sample in a hydrogen stream, the heating extraction temperature is set at 170°C to 550°C.
A method of extracting and quantifying by setting the required temperature within the range of ℃ to generate the oxygen of iron oxide on the surface of the sample as water, and then further increasing the temperature at each decomposition temperature of the oxide in the sample. A method for quantifying oxygen is characterized in that the oxygen of the oxide is generated as water while being allowed to stay or passed through the temperature, and the extracted and quantitatively determined water is extracted. In the present invention, water is mainly composed of water and also contains small amounts of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, which are produced by reaction with carbon, etc. in a steel sample, particularly at high temperatures. The present invention will be described in detail below. First, in the present invention, the temperature range for heating and extracting oxygen from iron oxide on the surface of a steel sample is set to 170°C to 550°C based on the following experiment. In addition, in the following experiments, the sample was a steel material that was cut with a saw blade or drill and sieved with a JIS standard sieve to obtain a constant particle size of 100 to 200 mesh.The hydrogen gas flow rate was 200 ml/min, the dew point was -61℃, and the temperature was heated. The extraction time was 2 hours. Since the dew point of hydrogen gas has a large effect on the heating extraction temperature and quantitative accuracy, it is desirable to keep it as low and constant as possible. FIG. 1 shows the results of quantifying the oxygen content of iron oxide on the surface of steel samples A and B, whose compositions are shown in Table 1, in a hydrogen stream at different heating extraction temperatures.
In FIG. 1, the horizontal axis is the heating extraction temperature, and the vertical axis is the quantitative value of oxygen, where a is the quantitative result for sample A, and b is the quantitative result for sample B. 1st
As shown in the figure, at temperatures below 170°C, the reaction rate of oxygen extraction from iron oxide on the sample surface is extremely low, making it unsuitable for quantitative purposes. Therefore, for the determination of iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface, it is necessary to set the heating extraction temperature to 170°C or higher. Also, as shown in Figure 1, below 550°C, only the iron oxide and oxygen on the sample surface are extracted and quantified without being affected by the oxide decomposition reaction inside the sample, whereas above 550°C, alloying elements are extracted and quantified. As the oxides of Si and Mn begin to decompose, the oxygen of these oxides is extracted and quantified together with the iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface, which causes an error in quantifying only the iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface. Therefore, in quantifying iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface, it is necessary to set the heating extraction temperature to 550°C or less. Based on the above findings, a temperature range of 170°C to 550°C is optimal for quantifying oxygen in iron oxide on the sample surface.
【表】
また第1図に示す如く試料内部の酸化物はそれ
ぞれ熱的安定性が異なるため酸化物ごとに異なる
温度で分解して酸素は水として抽出され定量され
る。したがつて加熱抽出温度を170℃〜550℃の範
囲内の所要温度に設定して試料表面の酸化鉄の酸
素を抽出し定量したのち、さらに550℃を超えて
昇温し鋼試料中に含まれる各種酸化物の各分解温
度において滞留せしめるかまたは該温度を通過せ
しめることによりそれぞれの酸化物の酸素量を分
別定量することができる。第2図は酸素の分別定
量の一例を示すもので第1表にその組成を示す鋼
試料Cについて定量を行なつた結果である。第2
図において横軸は加熱抽出時間、左側の縦軸は単
位時間あたりの酸素抽出量、右側の縦軸は加熱抽
出温度であり、cは水として抽出され定量された
酸素の加熱抽出曲線、dは加熱抽出温度である。
この実験においては常温から400deg/hrで昇温
して400℃にて2hr保持して試料表面の酸化鉄酸素
をまず定量し、次に200deg/hrで昇温して700℃
にて2hr保持して試料内部のMnOの酸素を定量し
た。ついで200deg/hrで昇温して1000℃にて2hr
保持して試料中のSiO2の酸素を定量したのちさ
らに100deg/hrで昇温して試料中のTiO2の酸素
を定量したものである。
第2図にその例を示す如く加熱抽出温度を試料
中の各酸化物の分解温度に滞留せしめて該酸化物
中の酸素を水として抽出し定量し終わつたのちさ
らに昇温を続けて次の酸化物の分解温度に滞留せ
しめて酸素を抽出し定量することを繰り返すこと
により試料中の酸素を各酸化物ごとに分別定量す
ることができる。
なお、各酸化物の酸素の定量においては該酸化
物の分解温度付近の一点に加熱抽出温度を保持し
て該酸化物の酸素を抽出し定量するか、あるいは
成分組成などから該酸化物のみが分解する温度範
囲が明らかな場合は一定の昇温速度で昇温しなが
ら該酸化物の分解温度を通過せしめつつ該酸化物
の酸素を抽出し定量するかのいずれでも良い。
次に本発明方法により酸素の定量を実施する要
領について述べる。
第3図は本発明方法を実施するための装置の一
例である。図において1は石英などの耐火物から
成る炉心管であつて温度制御部2を具備した加熱
炉3内に挿入される。微細に切削した鋼試料をベ
リリアなどの耐火物から成る試料ルツボ4に装入
して前記炉心管1内に挿入したのち水素ガス源5
からの水素ガスをガス精製部6で不純物(特に
水)を充分除去して流量制御部7で一定流量に制
御して炉心管1に導入し、加熱炉3を温度制御部
2により昇温させ鋼試料の酸素より生成され抽出
された水を水素ガスとともにその一部あるいは全
量を分析計8に導入し定量する。分析計8として
はたとえば質量分析計などのガス分析計あるいは
水分計などを用いることができる。
なおこの場合前述の如く試料表面の付着水は
150℃まで加熱する間にすべて脱離するのであら
かじめたとえばガス流路を切換えるなどの手段に
より試料表面の付着水分を系外に排出させておけ
ば測定においてバツク・グラウンドを低減し定量
精度を向上させることが可能である。
また約1000℃以上においては酸素の一部が鋼試
料中の炭素の存在により一酸化炭素あるいは二酸
化炭素として抽出されるのでこれを考慮に入れた
測定が必要である。ただし試料表面の酸化鉄酸素
の定量には問題はない。
次に実施例により本発明の効果をさらに具体的
に示す。
実施例 1
第2表にその組成を示す鋼試料DおよびEを微
細に切削して試料粒度を変えておのおのその1g
をとり第3図にその一例を示す装置で試料表面の
酸化鉄酸素を定量した結果を第3表に示す。
なおこのときの水素ガス流量は300ml/min、
露点は−62℃、加熱抽出温度は500℃、加熱抽出
時間は1hrであり分析計としてはカールフイツシ
ヤー滴定法による水分計を用いた。
第3表に示す如く試料粒度が細かくなるにした
がつて、すなわち試料重量あたりの表面積の増加
にしたがつて試料表面の酸化鉄酸素量が増加し本
発明方法によればその表面酸化鉄の酸素量を精度
良く定量できることが明らかとなつた。[Table] Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 1, the oxides inside the sample each have different thermal stability, so each oxide is decomposed at a different temperature, and oxygen is extracted and quantified as water. Therefore, after setting the heating extraction temperature to a required temperature within the range of 170°C to 550°C to extract and quantify the oxygen in iron oxide on the sample surface, the temperature is further increased to over 550°C to remove the oxygen contained in the steel sample. The amount of oxygen in each oxide can be determined separately by allowing the various oxides to remain at each decomposition temperature or passing through these temperatures. FIG. 2 shows an example of the fractional quantification of oxygen, and is the result of quantification for steel sample C whose composition is shown in Table 1. Second
In the figure, the horizontal axis is the heating extraction time, the vertical axis on the left is the amount of oxygen extracted per unit time, the vertical axis on the right is the heating extraction temperature, c is the heating extraction curve of oxygen extracted and quantified as water, and d is the heating extraction curve of oxygen extracted as water and quantified. This is the heating extraction temperature.
In this experiment, the temperature was raised from room temperature at 400deg/hr and held at 400°C for 2 hours to quantify the iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface, and then the temperature was raised at 200deg/hr to 700°C.
The sample was held for 2 hours and the oxygen in MnO inside the sample was quantified. Then, increase the temperature at 200deg/hr and hold at 1000℃ for 2hr.
After holding and quantifying the oxygen in SiO 2 in the sample, the temperature was further increased at 100 deg/hr to quantify the oxygen in TiO 2 in the sample. As shown in Fig. 2, the heating extraction temperature is kept at the decomposition temperature of each oxide in the sample, and after the oxygen in the oxides has been extracted as water and quantified, the temperature is continued to rise and the next By repeating the process of retaining the sample at the decomposition temperature of the oxide, extracting and quantifying oxygen, the oxygen in the sample can be determined separately for each oxide. In addition, in quantifying the oxygen of each oxide, either the heating extraction temperature is maintained at a point near the decomposition temperature of the oxide, and the oxygen of the oxide is extracted and quantified, or the oxygen of the oxide is determined based on the component composition. If the temperature range for decomposition is clear, oxygen from the oxide may be extracted and quantified while increasing the temperature at a constant rate and passing the decomposition temperature of the oxide. Next, the procedure for quantifying oxygen by the method of the present invention will be described. FIG. 3 is an example of an apparatus for carrying out the method of the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes a furnace core tube made of a refractory material such as quartz, which is inserted into a heating furnace 3 equipped with a temperature control section 2 . A finely cut steel sample is charged into a sample crucible 4 made of a refractory material such as beryllia and inserted into the reactor core tube 1, and then a hydrogen gas source 5 is introduced.
Impurities (particularly water) are sufficiently removed from the hydrogen gas in the gas purification section 6, the flow rate is controlled at a constant flow rate in the flow rate control section 7, and the hydrogen gas is introduced into the core tube 1, and the temperature of the heating furnace 3 is raised by the temperature control section 2. Part or all of the water generated and extracted from the oxygen of the steel sample is introduced into the analyzer 8 together with hydrogen gas for quantitative determination. As the analyzer 8, for example, a gas analyzer such as a mass spectrometer or a moisture meter can be used. In this case, as mentioned above, the water adhering to the sample surface is
All of the moisture is desorbed during heating to 150℃, so if you drain the moisture on the sample surface out of the system in advance by, for example, switching the gas flow path, you can reduce the background during measurement and improve quantitative accuracy. Is possible. Furthermore, at temperatures above about 1000°C, some of the oxygen is extracted as carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide due to the presence of carbon in the steel sample, so measurements must take this into account. However, there is no problem in quantifying iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface. Next, the effects of the present invention will be illustrated more specifically by Examples. Example 1 Steel samples D and E, whose compositions are shown in Table 2, were finely cut to give 1 g of each sample by changing the sample grain size.
Table 3 shows the results of quantifying the iron oxide oxygen on the surface of the sample using the apparatus shown in FIG. The hydrogen gas flow rate at this time was 300ml/min.
The dew point was -62°C, the heating extraction temperature was 500°C, the heating extraction time was 1 hr, and a moisture meter using Karl Fischer titration was used as the analyzer. As shown in Table 3, as the sample particle size becomes finer, that is, as the surface area per sample weight increases, the amount of iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface increases. It became clear that the amount could be quantified with high accuracy.
【表】【table】
【表】【table】
【表】
実施例 2
第2表にその組成を示す鋼試料D,E,Fを微
細に切削して試料粒度を100〜200メツシユとして
おのおのその2gをとり第3図にその一例を示す
装置で該試料の存在状態別定量を行なつた結果お
よび従来法であるヨウ素−メタノール法による抽
出分離定量結果を第4表に示す。第4表において
試料中の酸素とはMnO、SiO2、TiO2のそれぞれ
の酸素量の合計である。
なおこのときの水素ガス流量は200ml/min、
露点は−61℃であり、昇温条件は室温より
400deg/hrで昇温して400℃にて2.5hr保持して試
料表面の酸化鉄酸素を定量したのち100deg/hr
で昇温してMnOの定量においては650℃で1hr滞
留せしめ、SiO2の定量においては950℃で2hr滞
留せしめ、TiO2の定量においては1400℃で1hr滞
留せしめて、各酸化物の酸素を抽出し、分析計と
して質量分析計を用いて定量した。
第4表に示す如く鋼試料の酸素はさまざまな状
態で存在しており従来法では抽出分離時における
極微細酸化物の溶解やろ過時におけるろ過もれな
どにより定量値に誤差を生じているが本発明方法
によれば各酸化物ごとの酸素量を精度良く定量で
きることが明らかとなつた。
なお本実施例では鋼試料中のMnO、SiO2、
TiO2の酸素の分別定量について述べたが本発明
方法がAl2O3などの他の酸化物の酸素の定量にも
適用できることはもちろんである。[Table] Example 2 Steel samples D, E, and F, whose compositions are shown in Table 2, were finely cut to give a sample grain size of 100 to 200 mesh, and 2 g of each was taken using the apparatus whose example is shown in Figure 3. Table 4 shows the results of quantification of the sample according to its presence state and the results of extraction, separation and quantification using the conventional iodine-methanol method. In Table 4, the oxygen in the sample is the total amount of oxygen in MnO, SiO 2 and TiO 2 . The hydrogen gas flow rate at this time was 200ml/min.
The dew point is -61℃, and the heating conditions are higher than room temperature.
Raise the temperature at 400deg/hr, hold at 400℃ for 2.5hr, quantify the iron oxide oxygen on the sample surface, and then increase the temperature to 100deg/hr.
The temperature was raised at It was extracted and quantified using a mass spectrometer as an analyzer. As shown in Table 4, oxygen exists in various states in steel samples, and in conventional methods, errors occur in quantitative values due to dissolution of ultrafine oxides during extraction and separation and filtration leakage during filtration. It has become clear that according to the method of the present invention, the amount of oxygen for each oxide can be determined with high accuracy. In this example, MnO, SiO 2 ,
Although the method of the present invention has been described with respect to the fractional determination of oxygen in TiO 2 , it goes without saying that the method of the present invention can also be applied to the determination of oxygen in other oxides such as Al 2 O 3 .
第1図は加熱抽出温度に対する鋼試料の酸素の
定量値の変化を示す図、第2図は鋼試料の酸素の
存在状態別加熱抽出曲線、第3図は本発明方法を
実施するための装置の一例を示すブロツク図であ
る。
1……炉心管、2……温度制御部、3……加熱
炉、4……試料ルツボ、5……水素ガス源、6…
…ガス精製部、7……流量制御部、8……分析
計。
Figure 1 is a diagram showing changes in the quantitative value of oxygen in a steel sample with respect to heating extraction temperature, Figure 2 is a heating extraction curve for each steel sample depending on the state of oxygen present, and Figure 3 is an apparatus for carrying out the method of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1... Furnace core tube, 2... Temperature control section, 3... Heating furnace, 4... Sample crucible, 5... Hydrogen gas source, 6...
... Gas purification section, 7 ... Flow rate control section, 8 ... Analyzer.
Claims (1)
抽出温度を170℃〜550℃の範囲内の所要温度に設
定して該試料表面の酸化鉄の酸素を水として生成
せしめて抽出し定量することを特徴とする酸素定
量方法。 2 鋼試料を水素気流中で加熱するに際し、加熱
抽出温度を170℃〜550℃の範囲内の所要温度に設
定して該試料表面の酸化鉄の酸素を水として生成
せしめて抽出したのちさらに昇温して該試料中の
酸化物の各分解温度において滞留せしめるか、ま
たは該温度を通過せしめつつ該酸化物の酸素を水
として生成せしめて抽出しそれぞれ定量すること
を特徴とする酸素定量方法。[Claims] 1. When heating a steel sample in a hydrogen stream, the heating extraction temperature is set to a required temperature within the range of 170°C to 550°C to generate oxygen in iron oxide on the surface of the sample as water. A method for quantifying oxygen, which is characterized by extracting and quantifying oxygen. 2. When heating a steel sample in a hydrogen stream, the heating extraction temperature is set to a required temperature within the range of 170°C to 550°C to generate oxygen from iron oxide on the surface of the sample as water, which is extracted, and then further raised. 1. A method for quantifying oxygen, which comprises heating the sample and allowing the sample to remain at each decomposition temperature of the oxide, or passing through the temperature to generate oxygen in the oxide as water, extracting the water, and quantifying each.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5047879A JPS55142247A (en) | 1979-04-24 | 1979-04-24 | Quantitative measuring method of oxygen |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5047879A JPS55142247A (en) | 1979-04-24 | 1979-04-24 | Quantitative measuring method of oxygen |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS55142247A JPS55142247A (en) | 1980-11-06 |
| JPS6321137B2 true JPS6321137B2 (en) | 1988-05-02 |
Family
ID=12860003
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5047879A Granted JPS55142247A (en) | 1979-04-24 | 1979-04-24 | Quantitative measuring method of oxygen |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS55142247A (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102495044A (en) * | 2011-12-05 | 2012-06-13 | 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 | Component summation analysis method of oxygen content in aluminum killed steel |
-
1979
- 1979-04-24 JP JP5047879A patent/JPS55142247A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS55142247A (en) | 1980-11-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3958981A (en) | Process for degassing aluminum and aluminum alloys | |
| US2866701A (en) | Method of purifying silicon and ferrosilicon | |
| WO2024140018A1 (en) | Ultrapure ultralow-carbon nitrogen-controlled austenitic stainless steel for nuclear power and electroslag remelting method therefor | |
| AU2013315359B2 (en) | Removal of radioactive impurities from a copper ore or copper concentrate during or after smelting | |
| JPS6321137B2 (en) | ||
| EP4001443A1 (en) | Pgm recovery method | |
| US3975187A (en) | Treatment of carbothermically produced aluminum | |
| RU2623965C2 (en) | METHOD OF MODIFYING MAGNESIUM ALLOYS OF THE Mg-Al-Zn-Mn SYSTEM | |
| RU2010881C1 (en) | Process of producing aluminum-silicon alloys | |
| EP2743683B1 (en) | Molten iron desulfurization method | |
| JPH1073586A (en) | Method and apparatus for analyzing trace oxygen in metals | |
| CA1078626A (en) | Treatment of carbothermically produced aluminum | |
| US4329868A (en) | Method for the determination of hydrogen content in inorganic materials | |
| SU722977A1 (en) | Method of refining copper alloys | |
| RU2041459C1 (en) | Method of determination of diamonds in natural graphite-carrying ores and in their flotation concentrates | |
| JP2659596B2 (en) | Preservation method of metal-containing iron dust powder | |
| US5147450A (en) | Process for purifying magnesium | |
| JP2000206108A (en) | Composition for secondary treatment of Ca-containing oxide inclusion, Na-containing oxide inclusion and K-containing oxide inclusion in steel sample and secondary treatment method | |
| US2962370A (en) | Process for concentrating gallium oxide | |
| SU434299A1 (en) | METHOD FOR DETERMINING GASES IN METALS OF ALLOYS1 | |
| WO2010110064A1 (en) | Zirconium crucible | |
| SU686990A1 (en) | Method of obtaining nickel protoxide in catalyst | |
| JPH01279707A (en) | Removal of nitrogen from iron | |
| Noda et al. | Arc-Melting of Molybdenum in Argon--Hydrogen Gas Mixture | |
| Nakagawa et al. | Equilibrium of carbon and oxygen in molten iron saturated with carbon |