US20040071663A1 - Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions - Google Patents

Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040071663A1
US20040071663A1 US10/250,561 US25056103A US2004071663A1 US 20040071663 A1 US20040071663 A1 US 20040071663A1 US 25056103 A US25056103 A US 25056103A US 2004071663 A1 US2004071663 A1 US 2004071663A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
composition
agent
spp
chitinolytic
sulfide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/250,561
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jesus Campos
Eulogio Vazquez
Armando Garcia
Liuven Gonzalez
Marieta Bruzos
Oscar Alberto
Marilin Puente
Licette Barreras
Merardo Ferrero
Juan Ponce
Carlos Nordelo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Centro de Ingenieria Genetica y Biotecnologia CIGB
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Assigned to CENTRO DE INGENIERIA GENETICA Y BIOTECNOLOGIA reassignment CENTRO DE INGENIERIA GENETICA Y BIOTECNOLOGIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORDELO, CARLOS BORROTO, ALBERTO, OSCAR COMPTE, BARRERAS, LICETTE LEON, BRUZOS, MARIETA MARIN, CAMPOS, JESUS MENA, GARCIA, ARMANDO TOMAS HERNADEZ, GONZALEZ, LIUVEN VELOZ, PONCE, JUAN DIEGO MENCHO, PUENTE, MARILIN DOMINGO, VAZQUEZ, EULOGIO PIMENTAL, FERRERO, MERARDO PUJOL
Publication of US20040071663A1 publication Critical patent/US20040071663A1/en
Priority to US12/857,194 priority Critical patent/US8268306B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P31/00—Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics
    • A61P31/04—Antibacterial agents
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
    • A01N63/50—Isolated enzymes; Isolated proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P31/00—Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics
    • A61P31/10—Antimycotics
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P33/00—Antiparasitic agents

Definitions

  • This invention comprises several synergistic compositions, of the pesticide and antiparasitic kind, useful for the control of parasitic phytonematodes and zoonematodes, some diseases (fungal and bacterial), and the control of parasitic trematodes ( Fasciola hepatica ).
  • Nematode control still falls short.
  • the use of chemical nematicides is restricted each day more and more, because they have highly toxic and widespread action compounds.
  • efforts have been made to identify the effective means to eliminate the damage caused by nematodes, in favor of reducing the use of chemical pesticides.
  • One of the approaches is the use, of biological ones with specific mode of actions and relatively safer toxicological profiles, instead of chemical nematicides.
  • Some of the alternative nematicides include ABG-9008, a Myrothecium verrucaria fungus metabolite and a combination of avermectines (or related compounds, like milbecines) with fatty acids (Abercrombie K. D. 1994.
  • Another approach is to combine spores of Pasteuria penetrans a nematode bacterial parasite, with organophosphorated nematicides (Nordmeyer D. 1987. Synergistic nematocidal compositions of Pasteuria penetrans spores and an organophosphorus nematocide. 1987. CIBA-GEIGY AG Patent AU 06057386A1. 01/29/1987).
  • Chitinolytic fungi and bacteria that share the nematode's habitat may have certain biological balance and somehow restrict nematode proliferation.
  • Two strains of chitinolytic bacteria (Toda T. and Matsuda H. 1993. Antibacterial, anti-nematode and/or plant-cell activating composition, and chitinolytic microorganisms for producing the same. Toda Biosystem Laboratory, Japan. U.S. Pat. No. 5,208,159, May 4, 1993) have been claimed as antibacterial, antinematode and/or plant-cell activating composition.
  • Sulfides are inhibitors in the electron transport breathing process of the aerobic organism, just like other metabolites produced by certain soil bacteria (Rodriguez-Kábana, R. 1991. Control biológico de nematodes parasitos de plantas. NEMATROPICA, 21(1), pp 111-22).
  • PAECILTM also known as BIOACT or Nemachek
  • BIOACT is a biological nematicide that contains a patented strain from Paecilomyces lilacinus , in a dry and stable spore concentration for soil and seed treatment. This fungal species is commonly found in all soils worldwide.
  • the patented strain used as PAECILTM active ingredient has a particular effectiveness against plant parasitic nematodes. It was originally isolated at The Philippines University, and has been developed in Australia, Macquarie University. Furthermore, it has been broadly tested for the control of several kinds of nematodes that attack major crops in Australia, The Philippines, South Africa, and others.
  • PAECILTM formulation is commercially available as a pesticide registered in The Philippines, under the name of BIOACT R ; in South Africa, under the name of PL PLUS; and Indonesia, under the name of PAECILTM.
  • BIOACT R BIOACT R
  • PL PLUS in South Africa
  • Indonesia under the name of PAECILTM.
  • the above-mentioned instances fail to solve all parasitic helminth problems. Therefore, the need to implement improved means for parasite control to substitute chemical pesticides and antiparasitic products still remains.
  • Trematodes cause considerable economic damage to animal production and human health.
  • the diversity of the species, relative benign pathogenicity and endemism in isolated regions seem to be essential factors that effect on the lack of knowledge on trematodes.
  • intestinal trematodes are zoonotic and have a large number of reservoir hosts in each species.
  • Fasciola hepatica the first known parasitic trematode; it affects man by inhabiting the bile conduits. Its egg is one of the largest, ovoid and operculated from helminthes, and causes digestive malfunction consisting in gastric disepsia, colon motility malfunction, liver and bile vesicle pain, fever and hepatic colic. Other signs may include cystic forms in lungs, eyes, brain, hepatic vein, and other tissues (Saleha A. 1991. Liver fluke disease (fasciolosis) epidemiology, economic impact and public health significance. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public health 22 supp 1dic. P 361-4)
  • Zoohelminths have become significant pests to sheep and cattle. Antihelminthic resistance is wide, particularly in populations of small ruminant parasitic nematodes.
  • Dictyocaulus viviparous a parasite that comes to sexual maturity and when adult, is lodged in the lung of cattle, particularly young animals.
  • the diseased caused is known as verminose bronchitis, or bovine Dictyocaulosis, and infestation is produced after ingesting the 3 or infesting larvae, present in the pastures.
  • the treatment requires antihelminthics (Borgsteede F. H. M, de Leeuw W. A. & Burg W. P. J. 1988.
  • Trichoderma spp (Chet I, Inbar J. 1994 Biological control of fungal pathogens. Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 48(1): 37-43) a fungus whose action mechanism is largely discussed, where chitinases that degrade the cellular wall of the host fungus take part.
  • chitinolytic action from fungi and bacteria used as fungal disease bioregulators (Herrera-Estrella A, Chet 1.1999. Chitinases in biological control. EXS; 87:171-84).
  • Analyses of bacterium-bacterium interaction have shown there are three main types: antibiosis, substrate competition and parasitism.
  • antibiosis some bacterial strains are known to release antibiotics in order to suppress the surrounding bacterial activity, which may be used for biological control of pathogenic species.
  • substrate competition is a mechanism that may as well be used to achieve proper biological control, since the bioregulating organism is able to synthesize siderophores microelement quelant agents, which causes microelement deficiency, mainly iron, in the medium, thus inhibiting the respective pathogenic growth (Ongena M. 1998. Conference on biological controls. Training program in the area of biotechnology applied to agriculture and bioindustry. Gembloux, Belgium).
  • the invention is related with a composition that contains, at least, one chitinolytic agent or a chitinolytic activity inducing agent, and sulfide or a sulfide producing agent from microorganisms or chemical compounds, where the chitinolytic agent or a chitinolytic activity inducing agent, and sulfide or sulfide producing agent from microorganisms or chemical compounds, are concurrently applied at a substantially minor degree than when each component is used independently to achieve effective control over helminths and causative agents of bacterial and fungal diseases.
  • the invention is also related with the use of such compositions and/or the concurrent administration of the said compounds from different sources, such as, biologicals and chemicals for effective control over a wide spectrum of plant parasitic nematodes (Meloidogyne spp, Angina spp, Ditylenchus spp, Pratylenchus spp, Heterodera spp, Aphelenchus spp, Radopholus spp, Xiphinema spp, Rotylenchulus spp), animal parasitic nematodes and trematodes (Haemonchus spp, Trichostrongylus spp, Dictyocaulus spp.
  • plant parasitic nematodes Malignant nematodes
  • Angina spp Ditylenchus spp
  • Pratylenchus spp Pratylenchus spp
  • Heterodera spp Aphelenchus spp
  • the chitinolytic agent or the chitinolytic activity inducing agent and sulfide, or sulfide producing agent can be appropriately mixed in the form of a solution, suspension, emulsion, powder or granulating mixture, and is applied to the plant or soil as a fertilizer, pre-packed soil, covert seed device, a powder, granulate, nebulizer, a suspension, liquid, or any of the indicated form in capsules for the control of parasitic helmiths, and bacterial and fungal diseases.
  • a significant control over helminths, bacteria and fungi is achieved with a mixture of 1) a chitinase producing microorganism between 10 7 Colony Forming Units (CFU) and 10 12 CFU of a particular microorganism per composition gram or chitin between 1% and 50% of the composition; and 2) a sulfide producing microorganism between 10 7 CFU and 10 12 CFU of a particular microorganism per composition gram, or any sulfide producing chemical agent, where sulfide varies between 1.0 mg/minute per composition gram.
  • CFU Colony Forming Units
  • compositions with a microorganism between 10 7 CFU and 10 12 CFU per composition gram, that concurrently produces chitinolytic agents and sulfide, is appropriate for the control over helminths, bacteria and fungi.
  • the previous compositions involve combinations of the following agents in the above-mentioned proportions:
  • the previous compositions are effective against a wide range of plant parasitic nematodes, including, not limiting Meloidogyne species, such as, M. incognita ; Angina species, such as A. tritici ; Ditylencus species, such as D. dipsaci ; Pratylenchus species, such as P. coffee; Heterodera species, such as H. glycines; Aphelenchus species, such as A. avenae; Radopholus species, such as R. similis; Xiphinema species, such as X. index; Rotylenchulus species, such as R.
  • Meloidogyne species such as, M. incognita
  • Angina species such as A. tritici
  • Ditylencus species such as D. dipsaci
  • Pratylenchus species such as P. coffee
  • Heterodera species such as H. glycines
  • Aphelenchus species such as A
  • Zoonematodes such as: Haemonchus spp, Trichostrongylus spp, Ostertagia spp, Nematodirus spp, Cooperia spp, Ascaris spp, Bunostomum spp, Oesophagostomum spp, Chabertia spp, Trichuris spp, Strongylus spp, Trichonema spp., Dictyocaulus spp., Capillaria spp., Heterakis spp., Toxocara spp, Ascaridia spp, Oxyuris spp, Ancylostoma spp, Uncinaria spp, Toxascaris spp and Parascaris spp; trematodes, such as Fasciola hepatica; plant pathogenic bacteria, such as Erwinia chrysanthemi, Burkholderia glumae, and
  • the Meloidogyne incognita larvae were removed from the sift net and carefully resuspended with a LB medium solution diluted 10 times in sterile distilled water. The final collecting and disinfecting results were checked by counting and registering the live larvae with an inverted Olympus microscope.
  • the nematode's eggs and larvae were placed in a number of 100 individuals in approximately 2 ml of LB medium diluted 10 times. This volume was introduced into safety valves that allow the air to go through the liquid and, therefore, the gasses make contact with the eggs and larvae. Every valve was a replica for each treatment.
  • the hydrogen sulfide was obtained by a reaction against the chloride acid of two sulfide salts (Na 2 S and FeS), and from an anaerobial fermentation of bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans subs. desulfuricans ATCC 27774 (isolated from an ovine rumen).
  • the chitinolytic enzyme used was chitinase SIGMA C 1650, from bacterium Serratia marcescens.
  • Control treatment chitinase not applied, and air circulated through the valve.
  • Chitinase treatment chitinase at a rate of 0.2 units per replica.
  • Sulfide treatment hydrogen sulfide from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans with a 0.2 flux at 0.3 mg/minute.
  • the expected effectiveness (EE) must be equal to the sum of the individual effects (EI), given by the effectiveness rendered to the chitinase action (Eq) and the effectiveness rendered to the hydrogen sulfide action (Esn, Esf and Esd), minus the intersection effect (ei) (Sigarroa, A. 1985. Biometr ⁇ a y dise ⁇ o experimental. 1ra. Parte. Minist. Educa Terms Sup. Ed. Pueblo y Educa Terms. Cap. 3. pag 69-107).
  • Brown soil with neutral pH was selected: it was dried and sieved with a 0.5 cm net to remove the undesirable particles. It was sterilized in a vertical autoclave for 1 hour at 120° C. and 1 atmosphere (Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F. and Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd. Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., USA). It was dried at room temperature for 3-4 days to later make the foreseen mixtures in the treatments with river sand, soil worm humus and chitin (ICN catalogue number 101334).
  • Control treatment soil 70%, river sand 25% and humus 5%.
  • Microorganic treatment soil 70%, river sand 25%, humus 5% and D. desulfuricans , applied to a concentration of 1010 CFU-pot.
  • Injection 1 ml or ⁇ l of head space.
  • Carrier gas Nitrogen 1.5 ml/min.
  • Purge gas Nitrogen 30 ml/min.
  • Table 5 shows a summary of the sulfide gases analysis issued by the two strains at different times.
  • Sulfide gases analysis H 2 S flux mg/min (Sulfide flux detected) 18 24 Strains Samples 16 hours hours 20 hours 22 hours hours C-924 1 0.0673 0.2208 0.4779 0.3578 0.0672 2 0.0659 0.2160 0.4755 0.3552 0.0680
  • DSM 1 0.0231 0.0416 0.1014 0.1863 0.0009 20162 2 0.0240 0.0422 0.1040 0.1887 0.0097
  • the bacterial cultures of the studied strains were grown in LB medium at 28° C. and 100 rpm for 24 hours, followed by centrifugation at 3500 rpm; the supernatants were filtered through two 0.2 ⁇ m nets.
  • the filtered product was assayed in plates prepared with a chitin colloidal suspension (0.5%), agarose was added too, up to 0.8%, to achieve the medium gelling and assure porosity to facilitate protein diffusion. After gelling, 5 mm diameter wells were opened, where 100 ⁇ l of the filtered supernatant from each bacterial strain was added. Three replicas were used for every plate, and were incubated at 28° C. in the dark.
  • Eggs from parasite Fasciola hepatica were used. The egg collections were directly made from the infested liver bile of a bovine (cattle), previously sacrificed. The bile content was resuspended in a 3 times higher volume of distilled water and remained still for 2-3 hours at 28° C., to achieve egg precipitation. Then the greatest possible volume of supernatant liquid was removed. The precipitate was filtered through a sift net of 71 ⁇ m, where the eggs were trapped.
  • This parasitic trematode's eggs hatch under the previously in vitro set conditions in about 15 days of incubation at 28° C.; a good preparation of the sample was considered when more than 60% of the eggs hatched at the end of the incubation period.
  • the disinfected eggs were placed in a number of 100 individuals approximately, in 1 ml of LB medium diluted 10 times.
  • the volume was uniformly introduced in 20 safety valves that allow the air passage through the liquid; hence, the gases make contact with the eggs.
  • Each valve was a replica (4 per treatment) in all the five treatments.
  • Control treatment Addition of 1 ml of LB medium diluted 10 times to every valve, with no chitinase, and air circulating through it.
  • the expected effectiveness is given by the effectiveness rendered to the chitinase action (Eq) and the effectiveness rendered to the action of hydrogen sulfide (Esn, Esf and Esd), minus the intersection effect (ei) (Sigarroa, A. 1985. Biometria y dise ⁇ o experimental. 1ra. Parte. Minist. Educa Terms Sup. Ed. Pueblo y Educa Terms. Cap. 3. pag 69-107).
  • fungus species were used: Pestalotia palmarum, Alternaria tabacina, Sarocladium orizae, Pitium debaryanum; and the following bacterial species: Erwinia chrysanthemi, Burkholderia glumae, Serratia marcescen ATCC 13880, Bacillus subtilis F 1695 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, were used as well.
  • Table 9 shows the description of the results accomplished during the above mentioned interaction assays. TABLE 9 Results accomplished during interaction assays. Antagonistic effect of Species Description strain C-924. Pestalotia palmarum Fungus, Deuteromiceto, + + + phytopathogenic of foliage and fruits. Alternaria tabacina Fungus, Deuteromiceto, + + + phytopathogenic of tobacco leaves. Sarocladium orizae Fungus, Deuteromiceto, + + phytopathogenic of rice, it is involved in the acarus-fungus complex, affecting seeds, sheath and neck. Pytium debaryanum Fungus, Oomiceto, lives on the soil + and is part of the causative Damping-off complex.
  • Erwinia Bacterium isolation of Dahlia + + + chrysanthemi stems with soft rottenness symptoms. Burkholderia glumae Bacterium, isolation of rice plants + + with apical and marginal necrosis. Bacillus subtilis Bacterium, isolation of potato ⁇ cepa F1695 rhyzosphere in rottenness-free on affected field. Biorregulator.
  • antagonism was observed in the two pathogenic strains ( Erwinia crhysanthemi and Burkholderia glumae ), whereas antagonism was not observed in the case of Bacillus subtilis, as it is isolated from an antagonist soil with other microorganisms and; therefore, more resistant to adverse environmental factors.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Communicable Diseases (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
US10/250,561 2001-01-03 2001-12-17 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions Abandoned US20040071663A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/857,194 US8268306B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-08-16 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CU20010004A CU23176A1 (es) 2001-01-03 2001-01-03 Composiciones pesticidas y antiparasitarias
CU20010004 2001-01-03
PCT/CU2001/000014 WO2002052934A2 (es) 2001-01-03 2001-12-17 Composiciones pesticidas y anti-parasitarias

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CU2001/000014 A-371-Of-International WO2002052934A2 (es) 2001-01-03 2001-12-17 Composiciones pesticidas y anti-parasitarias

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/857,194 Division US8268306B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-08-16 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040071663A1 true US20040071663A1 (en) 2004-04-15

Family

ID=5459142

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/250,561 Abandoned US20040071663A1 (en) 2001-01-03 2001-12-17 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions
US12/857,194 Expired - Fee Related US8268306B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-08-16 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/857,194 Expired - Fee Related US8268306B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-08-16 Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions

Country Status (21)

Country Link
US (2) US20040071663A1 (de)
EP (1) EP1356733B1 (de)
JP (2) JP2004522727A (de)
CN (1) CN1241480C (de)
AT (1) ATE302552T1 (de)
AU (1) AU2002216898B2 (de)
BR (1) BR0116711B1 (de)
CA (1) CA2431669C (de)
CU (1) CU23176A1 (de)
DE (1) DE60112973T2 (de)
DK (1) DK1356733T3 (de)
EC (1) ECSP034675A (de)
ES (1) ES2247009T3 (de)
IL (2) IL156700A0 (de)
MX (1) MXPA03006040A (de)
PA (1) PA8536401A1 (de)
PE (1) PE20020778A1 (de)
RU (1) RU2249957C1 (de)
UY (1) UY27112A1 (de)
WO (1) WO2002052934A2 (de)
ZA (1) ZA200305121B (de)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110207604A1 (en) * 2010-02-25 2011-08-25 Marrone Bio Innovations Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
WO2013032693A3 (en) * 2011-08-27 2013-05-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom-formulations and uses
US8822193B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2014-09-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US9119401B2 (en) 2012-10-19 2015-09-01 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Plant glutamine synthetase inhibitors and methods for their identification
US9526251B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2016-12-27 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Use of Burkholderia formulations, compositions and compounds to modulate crop yield and/or corn rootworm infestation
KR101875591B1 (ko) * 2010-10-25 2018-07-06 마론 바이오 이노베이션스, 인코포레이티드 크로모박테리움 생리활성 조성물 및 대사 산물
WO2019051029A3 (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-05-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. NEW HERBICIDE COMPOUND
CN111088291A (zh) * 2018-10-24 2020-05-01 吉林大学 一种食线虫真菌分离株次级代谢产物及粗提物和医用用途

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CU23590A1 (es) * 2007-04-30 2010-10-30 Ct Ingenieria Genetica Biotech Composición biofertilizante
RU2353085C1 (ru) * 2007-07-06 2009-04-27 Государственное научное учреждение (ГНУ) Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт гельминтологии им. К.И. Скрябина (ВИГИС) Способ обработки растений огурца хитозаном против галловой нематоды (meloidogyne spp.)
CA2893027A1 (en) * 2012-12-03 2014-06-12 Bayer Cropscience Ag Composition comprising biological control agents
CL2013000307A1 (es) 2013-01-30 2014-04-04 Bio Insumos Nativa Ltda Composicion bionematicida que comprende al menos dos cepas de bacillus o los productos de fermentacion de las mismas, y un vehiculo agronomicamente aceptable; formulacion que comprende la composicion; cepa de bacilo nematicida
RU2571820C2 (ru) * 2014-03-20 2015-12-20 Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение "Научно-исследовательский ветеринарный институт Нечернозёмной зоны Российской Федерации" Способ прогнозирования степени трематоцидной активности в отношении эксцистированных личинок fasciola hepatica у растений
CN104206416B (zh) * 2014-08-07 2017-08-08 浙江大学 硫化氢或其可溶性盐在协同增强消毒灭菌效果中的应用
GB201502611D0 (en) * 2015-02-17 2015-04-01 Hydrolice As Method of treatment and/or prevention of a sea lice infestation on fish, and compositions for that use
EP3195727A1 (de) * 2016-01-22 2017-07-26 Forschungsinstitut Fur Biologischen Landbau (FiBL) Duddingtonia flagrans-stamm und futterzusatzformulierung zur biologischen schädlingsbekämpfung
RU2694182C1 (ru) * 2018-09-17 2019-07-09 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Горский государственный аграрный университет" Способ биологической борьбы с болезнями и вредителями городских зеленых насаждений
CU24557B1 (es) * 2018-09-27 2021-12-08 Ct Ingenieria Genetica Biotecnologia Composición sólida de uso agrícola que comprende cepa bacteriana de brevibacterium celere

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4940840A (en) * 1984-03-26 1990-07-10 Dna Plant Technology Corporation Novel chitinase-producing bacteria and plants
US5208159A (en) * 1989-05-16 1993-05-04 Toda Biosystem Laboratory Antibacterial, anti-nematode and/or plant-cell activating composition, and chitinolytic microorganisms for producing the same
US5346698A (en) * 1991-01-15 1994-09-13 Mycogen Corporation Synergistic pesticidal compositions

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5326561A (en) * 1992-12-15 1994-07-05 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Antifungal synergistic combination of enzyme fungicide and non-enzymatic fungicide and use thereof
ZA963440B (en) 1995-05-05 1997-02-24 Abbott Lab Synergistic nematocidal compositions.

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4940840A (en) * 1984-03-26 1990-07-10 Dna Plant Technology Corporation Novel chitinase-producing bacteria and plants
US5208159A (en) * 1989-05-16 1993-05-04 Toda Biosystem Laboratory Antibacterial, anti-nematode and/or plant-cell activating composition, and chitinolytic microorganisms for producing the same
US5346698A (en) * 1991-01-15 1994-09-13 Mycogen Corporation Synergistic pesticidal compositions

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9526251B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2016-12-27 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Use of Burkholderia formulations, compositions and compounds to modulate crop yield and/or corn rootworm infestation
US9701673B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2017-07-11 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US11793201B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2023-10-24 Pro Farm Group, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US8822193B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2014-09-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US11382331B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2022-07-12 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US9433218B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2016-09-06 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus Burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
WO2011106491A3 (en) * 2010-02-25 2012-03-15 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US10159250B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2018-12-25 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US20110207604A1 (en) * 2010-02-25 2011-08-25 Marrone Bio Innovations Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom
US10149480B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2018-12-11 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Use of Burkholderia formulations, compositions and compounds to modulate crop yield and/or corn rootworm infestation
KR101875591B1 (ko) * 2010-10-25 2018-07-06 마론 바이오 이노베이션스, 인코포레이티드 크로모박테리움 생리활성 조성물 및 대사 산물
WO2013032693A3 (en) * 2011-08-27 2013-05-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Isolated bacterial strain of the genus burkholderia and pesticidal metabolites therefrom-formulations and uses
US9119401B2 (en) 2012-10-19 2015-09-01 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. Plant glutamine synthetase inhibitors and methods for their identification
WO2019051029A3 (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-05-02 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. NEW HERBICIDE COMPOUND
CN111088291A (zh) * 2018-10-24 2020-05-01 吉林大学 一种食线虫真菌分离株次级代谢产物及粗提物和医用用途

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL156700A (en) 2007-07-24
EP1356733B1 (de) 2005-08-24
ZA200305121B (en) 2004-07-19
IL156700A0 (en) 2004-01-04
DE60112973D1 (de) 2005-09-29
RU2003124061A (ru) 2005-01-27
PE20020778A1 (es) 2002-10-16
CN1484494A (zh) 2004-03-24
US8268306B2 (en) 2012-09-18
WO2002052934A3 (es) 2002-09-19
AU2002216898B2 (en) 2006-09-07
JP2007326861A (ja) 2007-12-20
PA8536401A1 (es) 2003-06-30
WO2002052934A2 (es) 2002-07-11
ES2247009T3 (es) 2006-03-01
RU2249957C1 (ru) 2005-04-20
DE60112973T2 (de) 2006-05-18
ATE302552T1 (de) 2005-09-15
DK1356733T3 (da) 2005-11-14
MXPA03006040A (es) 2003-09-10
BR0116711A (pt) 2003-12-23
EP1356733A2 (de) 2003-10-29
JP2004522727A (ja) 2004-07-29
CA2431669A1 (en) 2002-07-11
UY27112A1 (es) 2002-03-22
US20110064718A1 (en) 2011-03-17
CA2431669C (en) 2012-02-07
BR0116711B1 (pt) 2014-10-07
CN1241480C (zh) 2006-02-15
CU23176A1 (es) 2006-09-22
ECSP034675A (es) 2003-10-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8268306B2 (en) Pesticidal and antiparasitic compositions
Ali et al. Nematicidal activity of some strains of Pseudomonas spp.
Ference et al. Recent advances in the understanding of Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri pathogenesis and citrus canker disease management
US9288993B2 (en) Copper resistant, fengycin-producing Bacillus mojavensis strain for controlling vegetable pathogens, its use and compositions containing it
Mohammed et al. Biocontrol efficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita
Verma et al. Microbes in termite management: potential role and strategies
Huang et al. Bacillus firmus I-1582 promotes plant growth and impairs infection and development of the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii over two generations
CN103096721A (zh) 细菌菌株以及包含所述细菌菌株的生物杀线虫剂和植物生长刺激物
Whitton Interactions with other organisms
Marciano et al. Metarhizium anisopliae sensu lato (sl) oil‐in‐water emulsions drastically reduced Rhipicephalus microplus larvae outbreak population on artificially infested grass
US7037494B2 (en) Formulations and methods for insect control
Verma et al. Eco-friendly termite management in tropical conditions
MX2014001251A (es) Composicion bionematicida y metodo para el control de nematodos fitopatogenos utilizando la misma.
Mohamed et al. Genetic improvement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus cereus for controlling root knot nematode and two weeds under laboratory conditions.
EP3897156B1 (de) Mikrobakterium esteraromaticum-stamm, zusammensetzung damit und verwendungen davon
Devi et al. Effect of some bacterial bioagents against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita race 2)
HANNA et al. Efficacy of antagonistic rhizobacteria on the control of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in tomato plants
Kakade et al. Efficacy of Photorhabdus as a promising Entomopathogenic bacteria in the eco-friendly biocontrol of White Grub larvae
Barreras et al. 12, Patent Application Publication o Pub. No.: US 2011/0064718A1
Bhattacherjee et al. Microbial biotransformation of neonicotinoid insecticides in soil–a review
Abu-Dhaim et al. Evaluation of Some Jordanian Bt Strains against Two Species of Root-Knot Nematodes.
Rakh et al. Crop microbes and biocontrol of plant phytopathogens
DUA Biological control of subterranean termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) with soil bacte-ria
Rajkumar et al. Screening and in vitro evaluation of native Pseudomonas spp., against nematode pathogens and soil borne fungal pathogens.
Nasr TOXICITY AND BIOCHEMICAL EFFECT OF ORGANOPHOSPHATES AND BIOPESTICIDES AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, Meloidogyne incognita

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CENTRO DE INGENIERIA GENETICA Y BIOTECNOLOGIA, CUB

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAMPOS, JESUS MENA;VAZQUEZ, EULOGIO PIMENTAL;GARCIA, ARMANDO TOMAS HERNADEZ;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014571/0950;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030729 TO 20030815

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION