EP1748021B2 - Procédé de mésure de charge pour grue - Google Patents
Procédé de mésure de charge pour grue Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1748021B2 EP1748021B2 EP06014597.6A EP06014597A EP1748021B2 EP 1748021 B2 EP1748021 B2 EP 1748021B2 EP 06014597 A EP06014597 A EP 06014597A EP 1748021 B2 EP1748021 B2 EP 1748021B2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- parameter
- values
- payload
- parameters
- determined
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
- B66C23/00—Cranes comprising essentially a beam, boom, or triangular structure acting as a cantilever and mounted for translatory of swinging movements in vertical or horizontal planes or a combination of such movements, e.g. jib-cranes, derricks, tower cranes
- B66C23/88—Safety gear
- B66C23/90—Devices for indicating or limiting lifting moment
- B66C23/905—Devices for indicating or limiting lifting moment electrical
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for determining the permissible load capacity of a crane.
- the permissible load capacity of a crane has been determined for certain set-up or condition parameters that have to be specified explicitly.
- load specifications are known for certain, specified revolving platform ballast levels of e.g. 10 t and 20 t or for certain boom lengths and projections.
- the permissible values of the payload are often given in the form of payload tables, whereby the values of the payload are usually given in relation to two parameters.
- a disadvantage of this procedure is that it is not possible to determine the payload for any parameter values that can be freely selected within a parameter range, which results in the disadvantage that the payload determination is relatively imprecise.
- the DE 199 33 917 describes a method for setting a safety working range and a rated load in accordance with a working condition of the machine. According to this method, from a rated load based on the strength, which is set in consideration of the working radius and the strength of the pivot member and which is constant regardless of the pivot angle of the pivot member, and a rated load on the Based on the stability, which is set in consideration of the stability of the working machine and which changes depending on the swivel angle of the swivel element, the lower value is picked up for each swivel angle and set as a nominal load to be actually used, which is output by a nominal load data output device.
- the EP 1 153 876 describes a method for overload protection of a mobile crane, in which component-related geometric data are stored in a memory. According to a selected setup state, the geometry data are compiled in a simulation computer to form a physical simulation model. Taking real measurement data into account, the required geometrical data, center of gravity data and forces and, from this, the shutdown values are calculated.
- the load capacity is determined as a function of the crane's radius and the main boom angle of the crane, and that the method includes a first step in which the load capacities for the crane's radius at different values of the crane's main boom angle are determined by interpolation or extrapolation on the basis of known values of the lifting capacity at certain values of the radius of the crane, and in that the method comprises a second step in which the lifting capacity for the value of the main boom angle of the crane on the basis of the in the first step for different values of the main boom angle of the crane is carried out by interpolation or extrapolation, whereby the specific values of the crane radius, for which the values of the lifting capacity are known, are selected as a function of the values of the main boom angle of the crane.
- the load capacity is to be determined, for example, as a function of the parameters radius (21.7 m) and main boom angle (83 °).
- the following procedure can be used:
- the permissible load capacity is determined, for example, by interpolating the load capacity for a first and second angle (77 °; 87 °) of the main boom using two support points from load capacity values that are known for the different projections are. It is conceivable, for example, to interpolate for a radius of 21.7 m between the support points 20 m and 22 m where the load capacity is known. This interpolation is carried out for a boom angle of 77 ° and for a boom angle of 87 °.
- the specific values of the outreach of the crane are selected as a function of the values of the main boom angle of the crane.
- smaller values of the radius are selected as support points than with a smaller main boom angle.
- the support points with a main boom angle of 77 ° at 20 m and 22 m and with a main boom angle of 87 ° at 14 m and 16 m.
- the procedure for selecting the specific values of the crane radius, for which the values of the load capacity are known, depending on the values of the main boom angle of the crane is of course not only applicable to the parameters radius and main boom angle, but also for other parameters, in particular applicable to parameters that are dependent on each other.
- the interpolation or extrapolation can be carried out assuming a linear relationship or also on the basis of any other functions that reflect a dependency of the payload on the respective parameter.
- the method according to the invention is not restricted to two independent parameters. Rather, any number of parameters that have an influence on the load-bearing capacity can be taken into account. It can thus be provided that the The payload is to be determined as a function of n parameters, where n ⁇ 2 and wherein the method comprises an n-th step in which the payload is determined on the basis of the in the (n-1) -th step for different values of the n- The values of the payload determined by the th parameter are carried out by interpolation or extrapolation. This means that the nth step in determining the load capacity works with support points that were determined in the previous, ie (n-1) th step.
- the method can be implemented with a small number of support points. In principle, it is sufficient if the interpolation or the extrapolation is carried out on the basis of two interpolation points.
- the parameters are entered by hand.
- the parameters on the crane can be determined by a sensor.
- a stepless setting or acquisition of the parameters is preferably possible.
- the acquisition of a parameter by means of a sensor is particularly useful if the value has a fixed size (e.g. ballast plate identification) or can be rounded to a fixed size (discretization).
- the acquisition of parameters by means of a sensor comes into consideration, for example, with the parameters revolving platform ballast and / or central ballast.
- other parameters such as the wind speed, can also be detected by means of a sensor.
- the parameters that are included in the calculation of the load capacity are preferably set-up or condition parameters of the crane.
- Parameters in addition to the outreach of the crane or the main boom angle of the crane, which have an influence on the load capacity, can be selected from the following non-exhaustive group: turntable ballast, central ballast (undercarriage additional weight), support geometry, wind speed, longitudinal and lateral inclination of the crane, travel speed (for tables on tires or caterpillars), derrick radius, derrick ballast, angle of rotation of the turntable, longitudinal and transverse angles of the jib guy stand (TA, TY).
- TA jib guy stand
- the sensor value can be used to make the load capacity calculation, preferably permanently, when a parameter limit is exceeded for the first time to switch so that a different, possibly a lower parameter value is taken into account for the measured sensor value. In this way it is possible to determine a small and therefore safer payload in operation.
- the load calculation is carried out for any freely selectable values of a parameter within a parameter range.
- the value of the parameter can, for example, be typed in using a number keypad on a monitor.
- the parameter values for a derrick crane with luffing jib without derrick ballast are a main boom angle of 83 ° and an outreach of 21.7 m.
- the dependence of the permissible load on the outreach for the main boom angles 77 ° and 87 is known °.
- the load capacity value for the radius of 21.7 m is determined by interpolation between the known support points at 20 m and at 22 m, both at the main boom angle of 77 ° and at the main boom angle of 87 °.
- the load capacity values obtained for both main boom angles 77 ° and 87 ° are interpolated Load value determined for the main boom angle 83 °. There are thus two interpolations of the payload depending on the radius and one interpolation of the payload depending on the main boom angle.
- the support points of the overhang are selected differently for the different main boom angles.
- the parameter values for a derrick crane without luffing jib with derrick ballast are a derrick ballast radius of 14.5 m and an outreach of 21.7 m.
- the dependence of the permissible load capacity on the outreach for the derrick ballast radii 13 m is known and 15 m.
- the load capacity value for the radius of 21.7 m is determined by interpolation between the known support points at 20 m and at 22 m, both for the derrick ballast radius of 13 m and for the derrick ballast radius of 15 m
- the load value for the derrick ballast radius 14.5 m is also determined by interpolation.
- the method according to the invention is not limited to the determination of the payload as a function of two parameters. There is no limit to the number of parameters.
- the parameter values for a derrick crane with luffing jib and derrick ballast be a radius of 21.7 m, a derrick ballast radius of 14.5 m and a main boom angle of 83 °.
- the permissible load capacity depends on the radius for the derrick ballast radii 13 m and 15 m, specifically for the main boom angles of 77 ° and 87 °.
- the load capacity value for the radius of 21.7 m is determined in a first step by interpolation between the known support points at 20 m and at 22 m both with the derrick ballast radius of 13 m and with the derrick ballast radius 15 m and this separately for both main boom angles.
- the support points for the projection are selected differently for different main boom angles.
- four interpolations of the load are carried out in the first step depending on the radius.
- the values determined for derrick ballast radius values of 13 m and 15 m are interpolated with respect to the value 14.5 m. This interpolation takes place for both main boom angles (77 ° and 87 °).
- the payload is to be determined as a function of four parameters. These are the parameters outreach (21.7 m), main boom angle (83 °), derrick ballast radius (14.5 m) and derrick ballast (255 t).
- the load capacities are known depending on the radius for two different derrick ballast radii, namely with the parameter values derrick ballast 200 t and 300 t and with the main boom angles 77 ° and 87 °.
- the load capacity for the radius of 21.7 m and for derrick ballast radii of 13 m and 15 m is determined between the support points of the 20 m and 22 m radius. This determination is made for the four pairs of values of the derrick ballast and the main boom angle 300t, 77 °; 300 t, 87 °; 200 t, 77 ° and 200t, 87 °. In total there are eight interpolations of the load capacity depending on the radius carried out at two support points each. On the basis of two of the load values determined in this way, four interpolations are carried out for the derrick ballast radius value of 13.7 m.
- the load values determined for the four aforementioned pairs of values are fed to further interpolation steps, two interpolations being carried out for different main boom angles and the same derrick ballast radii in each case.
- the result of this interpolation consists of two load values for different derrick ballast values.
- the last interpolation is carried out with a view to determining the load value for different derrick ballast values at 200 t and 300 t in order to obtain the permissible load value for a derrick ballast of 255 t in this way.
- the support points for the projection are selected differently depending on the main boom angle.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Jib Cranes (AREA)
- Control And Safety Of Cranes (AREA)
Claims (8)
- Procédé de détermination de la charge admissible d'une grue, dans lequel la charge doit être déterminée en fonction de n paramètres, où n ≥ 2, et où les paramètres comprennent au moins un premier et un deuxième paramètre, le procédé comprenant
une première étape lors de laquelle les charges pour la valeur du premier paramètre, pour des valeurs différentes du deuxième paramètre, sont déterminées par l'interpolation ou l'extrapolation sur la base de valeurs connues de la charge, pour des valeurs déterminées du premier paramètre,
une deuxième étape, lors de laquelle la charge pour la valeur du deuxième paramètre, sur la base des valeurs de la charge déterminées lors de la première étape pour des valeurs différentes du deuxième paramètre, est exécutée par calcul ou par interpolation ou extrapolation,
caractérisé en ce que
les valeurs déterminées du premier paramètre, auxquelles les valeurs de la charge sont connues, sont sélectionnées en fonction des valeurs du deuxième paramètre, de sorte que les valeurs déterminées du premier paramètre sont différents pour les différents valeurs du deuxième paramètre, et
le premier paramètre est une projecture de la grue et le deuxième paramètre est l'angle de la projecture de la grue, et
en cas d'un plus grand angle de bras principale, c.-à.-d. en cas d'un bras principale incliné plus raide, des valeurs plus faibles de la projecture sont sélectionnés qu'en cas d'une angle de bras principale plus faible. - Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le procédé comprend une nième étape lors de laquelle la charge pour le nième paramètre est exécutée sur la base des valeurs de la charge déterminée lors de la (n-1)ième étape pour des valeurs différentes du nième paramètre, par interpolation ou extrapolation.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 et 2, caractérisé en ce que l'interpolation respectivement l'extrapolation est exécutée sur la base de deux emplacements de support.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les paramètres sont entrés à la main ou sont détectés au moyen d'un capteur et peuvent ensuite servir de base pour la détermination de la charge.
- Procédé selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que la détection de valeurs de paramètres est exécutée par un capteur pour des paramètres qui ont une valeur définie ou peuvent être arrondis à une valeur définie.
- Procédé selon la revendication 4 ou 5, caractérisé en ce que les valeurs des paramètres ballast de plate-forme tournante et/ou ballast central sont détectés par un capteur.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que dans le cas des paramètres, il s'agit de paramètres d'armement et/ou d'état d'une grue.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que lors du dépassement d'une limite de paramètre, à la place de la valeur du paramètre mesuré par un capteur, une autre valeur de paramètre est utilisée à laquelle une charge plus basse est obtenue.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102005035460A DE102005035460A1 (de) | 2005-07-28 | 2005-07-28 | Verfahren zur Traglastermittlung bei Kranen |
Publications (4)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1748021A2 EP1748021A2 (fr) | 2007-01-31 |
| EP1748021A3 EP1748021A3 (fr) | 2008-01-09 |
| EP1748021B1 EP1748021B1 (fr) | 2012-01-11 |
| EP1748021B2 true EP1748021B2 (fr) | 2021-06-02 |
Family
ID=37401146
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP06014597.6A Active EP1748021B2 (fr) | 2005-07-28 | 2006-07-13 | Procédé de mésure de charge pour grue |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US9126812B2 (fr) |
| EP (1) | EP1748021B2 (fr) |
| JP (1) | JP5512912B2 (fr) |
| DE (1) | DE102005035460A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102005035460A1 (de) | 2005-07-28 | 2007-02-01 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Verfahren zur Traglastermittlung bei Kranen |
| DE202010014309U1 (de) * | 2010-10-14 | 2012-01-18 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Kran, insbesondere Raupen- oder Mobilkran |
| DE102011107754B4 (de) * | 2011-06-10 | 2021-07-22 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Winkelbezogenes Verfahren zur Überwachung der Kransicherheit während des Rüstvorgangs, sowie Kran und Kransteuerung |
| RU2012140237A (ru) * | 2011-09-23 | 2014-03-27 | МАНИТОВОК КРЕЙН КАМПЕНИЗ, ЭлЭлСи | Система и способы контроля выносных опор |
| AU2013267148B9 (en) * | 2012-06-01 | 2017-04-06 | Seatrax, Inc. | System and method to determine relative velocity of crane and target load |
| DE102012011871B4 (de) | 2012-06-13 | 2020-09-03 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Verfahren zur Überwachung der Kransicherheit sowie Kran |
| DE102012011726C5 (de) | 2012-06-13 | 2024-06-13 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Krans mit Überwachungseinheit sowie Kran |
| EP2674384B1 (fr) | 2012-06-13 | 2021-01-27 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen GmbH | Procédé de surveillance de la sécurité d'une grue et grue |
| CN107848774B (zh) | 2015-06-24 | 2022-03-25 | 帕尔菲格股份有限公司 | 起重机控制装置和相应的起重机 |
| DE102015112194B4 (de) | 2015-07-27 | 2019-01-03 | Manitowoc Crane Group France Sas | Verfahren zur Planung oder Überwachung der Bewegung eines Kranes sowie Kran |
| DE102016104358B4 (de) | 2016-03-10 | 2019-11-07 | Manitowoc Crane Group France Sas | Verfahren zum Ermitteln der Tragfähigkeit eines Krans sowie Kran |
| FR3125031B1 (fr) * | 2021-07-08 | 2023-11-03 | Manitowoc Crane Group France | Procédé d’adaptation d’une courbe de charge d’une grue en fonction de sa configuration |
| US12384663B2 (en) * | 2022-08-02 | 2025-08-12 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Incorporated | Haptic feedback system for anti-sway control of a payload |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2635974A1 (de) † | 1976-08-10 | 1978-02-23 | Precilec Sa | Vorrichtung zur kontrolle der last einer hebeeinrichtung |
| DE2910057A1 (de) † | 1979-03-14 | 1980-09-25 | Pietzsch Ludwig | Lastmomentbegrenzer fuer einen kran |
Family Cites Families (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3638211A (en) * | 1969-10-08 | 1972-01-25 | Litton Systems Inc | Crane safety system |
| JPS5561597A (en) * | 1978-10-27 | 1980-05-09 | Tadano Tekkosho Kk | Device for preventing overloading of crane |
| DE3420596C2 (de) | 1984-06-01 | 1986-10-02 | Dr.-Ing. Ludwig Pietzsch Gmbh & Co, 7505 Ettlingen | Überwachungs- und Steuersystem für Auslegerkrane |
| JPS62153089A (ja) * | 1985-12-24 | 1987-07-08 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | クレ−ンの過負荷防止装置 |
| DE68923278T3 (de) | 1988-12-27 | 2004-08-05 | Kato Works Co. Ltd. | Sicherheitsanordnung für kräne. |
| JPH085623B2 (ja) * | 1989-09-27 | 1996-01-24 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | クレーンの安全装置 |
| JP2564060B2 (ja) * | 1991-10-24 | 1996-12-18 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 建設機械の安全装置 |
| DE19538264C2 (de) * | 1995-10-13 | 1999-02-18 | Pietzsch Automatisierungstech | Verfahren und interaktive Bedienkonsole zur Vorbereitung und Einrichtung eines mobilen Arbeitsgerätes |
| US6744372B1 (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2004-06-01 | Jack B. Shaw | Crane safety devices and methods |
| JP2000034093A (ja) * | 1998-07-21 | 2000-02-02 | Kobe Steel Ltd | 旋回式作業機械とその安全作業領域及び定格荷重の設定方法 |
| DE19931302B4 (de) * | 1999-07-07 | 2006-03-30 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Kontinuierlich verstellbarer Kran |
| DE10023418A1 (de) * | 2000-05-12 | 2001-11-15 | Liebherr Werk Nenzing | Verfahren zur Überlastsicherung eines mobilen Kranes |
| KR100416395B1 (ko) * | 2001-12-04 | 2004-01-31 | 주식회사 광림 | 크레인 과부하 방지장치 |
| DE102005059768A1 (de) * | 2005-07-22 | 2007-01-25 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Kran, vorzugsweise Raupen- oder Fahrzeugkran |
| DE102005035460A1 (de) | 2005-07-28 | 2007-02-01 | Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh | Verfahren zur Traglastermittlung bei Kranen |
-
2005
- 2005-07-28 DE DE102005035460A patent/DE102005035460A1/de not_active Ceased
-
2006
- 2006-07-13 EP EP06014597.6A patent/EP1748021B2/fr active Active
- 2006-07-26 US US11/494,263 patent/US9126812B2/en active Active
- 2006-07-27 JP JP2006204584A patent/JP5512912B2/ja active Active
-
2010
- 2010-06-09 US US12/797,405 patent/US9957141B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2635974A1 (de) † | 1976-08-10 | 1978-02-23 | Precilec Sa | Vorrichtung zur kontrolle der last einer hebeeinrichtung |
| DE2910057A1 (de) † | 1979-03-14 | 1980-09-25 | Pietzsch Ludwig | Lastmomentbegrenzer fuer einen kran |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US9126812B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 |
| US20070027613A1 (en) | 2007-02-01 |
| US9957141B2 (en) | 2018-05-01 |
| US20100250153A1 (en) | 2010-09-30 |
| EP1748021A2 (fr) | 2007-01-31 |
| EP1748021B1 (fr) | 2012-01-11 |
| JP5512912B2 (ja) | 2014-06-04 |
| JP2007031155A (ja) | 2007-02-08 |
| DE102005035460A1 (de) | 2007-02-01 |
| EP1748021A3 (fr) | 2008-01-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1748021B2 (fr) | Procédé de mésure de charge pour grue | |
| EP3134344B1 (fr) | Procédé et appareil pour faire fonctionner une grue mobile ainsi que la grue mobile | |
| DE102016104358B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Ermitteln der Tragfähigkeit eines Krans sowie Kran | |
| EP2674384B1 (fr) | Procédé de surveillance de la sécurité d'une grue et grue | |
| DE102011107754B4 (de) | Winkelbezogenes Verfahren zur Überwachung der Kransicherheit während des Rüstvorgangs, sowie Kran und Kransteuerung | |
| DE102011115224C5 (de) | Kran, insbesondere Raupen-oder Mobilkran | |
| EP1153876B1 (fr) | Procédé pour protéger une grue mobile contre une surcharge | |
| WO2008122448A1 (fr) | Procédé de détermination de centres de gravité de masse de structures de grande taille | |
| DE2659755B2 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Abgeben eines Sollwertsignals für eine Überwachungseinrichtung eines Auslegerkranes o.dgl | |
| EP2524892A1 (fr) | Commande de grue | |
| DE10233875B4 (de) | Krananlage, insbesondere Containerkran | |
| DE102004021840A1 (de) | Lade- und/oder Hubgerät, insbesondere Reachstacker | |
| DE102012011871B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Überwachung der Kransicherheit sowie Kran | |
| EP3067257B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procede de determination de la repartition de la pression au sol pour une machine de travail mobile | |
| DE602004006731T2 (de) | Hydraulischer Kran | |
| DE19931302A1 (de) | Kontinuierlich verstellbarer Kran | |
| DE102016203607A1 (de) | Kran | |
| DE102012011726C5 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Krans mit Überwachungseinheit sowie Kran | |
| DE2820353A1 (de) | Einrichtung zur kontrolle des belastungszustands fuer ein hebezeug | |
| EP2378054B1 (fr) | Engin avec un dispositif de sécurité | |
| DE102015112194A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Planung oder Überwachung der Bewegung eines Kranes sowie Kran | |
| DE2721400C2 (de) | Kranlastanzeigevorrichtung | |
| EP1925586A1 (fr) | Grue mobile | |
| DE2509641A1 (de) | Ueberlastmelder fuer einen kran | |
| EP3670428A1 (fr) | Procédé de détermination de chargement d'un chariot de manutention et chariot de manutention |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080326 |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080508 |
|
| AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR IT |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR IT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502006010823 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120315 |
|
| PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
| 26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH Effective date: 20121011 Opponent name: MANITOWOC CRANE GROUP GERMANY GMBH Effective date: 20121010 |
|
| PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502006010823 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121010 |
|
| PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
| APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
| APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
| APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
| APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
| APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
| APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
| APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
| R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: MANITOWOC CRANE GROUP GERMANY GMBH Effective date: 20121010 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
| PLAY | Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PLBC | Reply to examination report in opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3 |
|
| PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
| 27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20210602 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): DE FR IT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502006010823 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20210730 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230607 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220713 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230721 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250730 Year of fee payment: 20 |