EP3225499A1 - Verfahren zur steuerung des verkehrs von fahrzeugen auf einem schienennetz, entsprechendes steuerungssystem und entsprechende schienenanlage - Google Patents
Verfahren zur steuerung des verkehrs von fahrzeugen auf einem schienennetz, entsprechendes steuerungssystem und entsprechende schienenanlage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3225499A1 EP3225499A1 EP17163565.9A EP17163565A EP3225499A1 EP 3225499 A1 EP3225499 A1 EP 3225499A1 EP 17163565 A EP17163565 A EP 17163565A EP 3225499 A1 EP3225499 A1 EP 3225499A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- platform
- vehicle
- controller
- protocol
- facades
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61B1/00—General arrangement of stations, platforms, or sidings; Railway networks; Rail vehicle marshalling systems
- B61B1/02—General arrangement of stations and platforms including protection devices for the passengers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0027—Radio-based, e.g. using GSM-R
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0072—On-board train data handling
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/30—Trackside multiple control systems, e.g. switch-over between different systems
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L3/00—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal
- B61L3/02—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control
- B61L3/08—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically
- B61L3/12—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using radio waves
- B61L3/125—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using radio waves using short-range radio transmission
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a system for managing the circulation of at least one vehicle, as well as a railway installation.
- the invention applies to the railway field, the method and the system being intended for a railway installation.
- railway facilities typically include stations with platforms for eg the descent and the rise of passengers.
- the platform façades define an open position and a closed position. Such quaysides are automatically controlled so, for example, to be in the open position when a vehicle is parked at a dock.
- CBTC Commission Based Train Control
- the CBTC system ensures the articulation between the opening or closing position of the wharf façades and the circulation of the vehicles.
- a vehicle approaching a quay with dock façades will only be authorized to enter the station if the quay facades are securely locked in the closed position.
- the CBTC system so as to distinguish, in a part of the CBTC system embedded in the vehicles, quays without quayside facades and those with quay façades.
- the accuracy required for the stopping position of a train is greater in the case of a wharf with wharf facades, than in the case of a wharf devoid of wharf facades.
- the doors of the train must be aligned with the doors of the quaysides.
- An object of the invention is to manage the movement of at least one vehicle in a railway installation whose implementation is independent of the presence or absence of dock facades on the various platforms, and does not require modification of the part of the CBTC system embedded in each vehicle.
- the controller is adapted for, when the vehicle is parked at the current dock or when the vehicle is traveling on the tracks and the next dock is the current dock, implementing the second protocol when the specific information is received.
- railway installation which includes tracks, at least one station comprising at least one platform, each platform being suitable for receiving platform facades.
- the railway installation also comprises at least one vehicle adapted to travel on the tracks, and at least one system as defined above.
- a railway installation 10 is represented on the figure 1 .
- the railway facility 10 is, for example, an urban rail transport facility of the subway or tramway type.
- the railway installation 10 comprises tracks 12, at least one station 14, at least one vehicle 16 and a management system 18.
- the tracks 12 are adapted to ensure the circulation of vehicles 16.
- the stations 14 define places in which the vehicles 16 are likely to park.
- Each station 14 comprises at least one platform 20.
- the railway installation 10 comprises three stations 14A, 14B and 14C each comprising a single platform 20A, 20B and 20C respectively.
- a station 14 comprises several platforms 20.
- a vehicle 16 parks at a platform 20 of a station 14 to allow the movement of passengers between the vehicle 16 and the platform 20.
- At least some platforms 20 are suitable for receiving platform facades 22.
- wharves 20 have pier façades 22 while other wharves 20 do not have wharf facades 22.
- all the platforms 20 are devoid of platform façades 22.
- platform façades 22A and 22B represented by hatched areas, the other platform 20C without platform façades 22.
- the platform façades 22 are generally installed along the edges of tracks 12 and are, for example, formed by doors and facades separating the platform 20 from the tracks 12.
- the facades and the doors are, for example, glazed and have a sufficient height. to dissuade an individual from stepping over them.
- the platform facades 22 are intended to improve safety, in particular by preventing users from going to the tracks 12.
- the doors In the open position, the doors are open and / or unlocked.
- wharf facades 22 installed on a platform 20 comprise a platform facade management module, not shown in the figures.
- the dock facade management module is adapted to receive control signals and to transmit at least one status signal.
- control signals are an opening signal and a closing signal.
- the platform facades management module Upon receipt of the opening signal, respectively closure, the platform facades management module is adapted to pass the platform facades 22 in the open position, respectively closing.
- the status signal is a signal indicating that the doors of the platform facades 22 are locked in the closed position.
- a second status signal indicates that the dock facade management module is not able to transmit the status signal.
- control and status signals are binary signals transmitted by respective wire connections.
- each platform 20 comprises a set of corresponding wire connections. For example, a wired connection that is powered up is true, and a wired, unpowered connection is false.
- the vehicle 16 is adapted to travel on the tracks 12 and is, for example, a railway vehicle such as a subway or a tram.
- the management system 18 is intended to ensure the circulation of a vehicle 16 in the railway facility 10 regardless of the presence or absence of platform facades 22.
- the management system 18 comprises a communication interface 24, at least one inhibiting device 26, and at least one controller 28 installed in each vehicle 16.
- the communication interface 24 is capable of ensuring a two-way communication between the controller 28 on the one hand and equipment installed on the platforms 20 on the other hand.
- the equipment installed on the platforms 20 are, in particular, the or each inhibiting device 26 and the wire connections.
- the communications between the communication interface 24 and the controller 28 are implemented by radio and the communications between the communication interface 24 and the equipment are implemented by wire.
- the communication interface 24 comprises a radio encoder 30, at least one switch 32 and at least one access point 34.
- the radio encoder 30 is able to send messages in a first format from states received in a second format, and vice versa.
- the first format is a secure Ethernet format and the second format is the binary format.
- the radio encoder 30 is wiredly connected on the one hand to the equipment and on the other hand to the switch 32.
- the switch 32 is connected to each of the access points 34 wired.
- Each of the access points 34 comprises an antenna intended to implement radio communications with the controller 28.
- the management system 18 comprises three inhibiting devices 26A, 26B and 26C corresponding to each of the platforms 20A, 20B and 20C.
- each inhibiting device 26 is installed on a corresponding platform 20.
- the inhibiting devices 26 are external to the vehicle 16. By this, it is understood that the inhibiting devices 26 are not mechanically linked to the vehicle 16.
- Each inhibiting device 26 is capable of emitting a specific state at the platform 20.
- a state specific to the platform 20 indicates, for example, the presence of platform facades 22 on the platform 20 on which the inhibitor device 26 is installed.
- Another state specific to the platform 20 indicates, for example, the absence of platform facades 22 on the platform 20 on which the inhibitor device 26 is installed.
- another wharf-specific state 20 indicates, for example, a failure of the wharf facades 22 on the wharf 20 on which the inhibitor device 26 is installed.
- the platform-specific state 20 is binary and takes the value “false” when the platform 20 is provided with platform façades 22 and takes the value "true” when the platform 20 does not have platform façades 22.
- additional equipment is connected to the input of the radio encoder 30 and is adapted to associate each of the received values of the inhibitor devices 26 with a quay number so as to provide the radio encoder with 30 pairs. , each pair being formed of a binary value and a platform number.
- the radio encoder 30 Upon receipt of a specific state at a platform 20 taking the value "true", the radio encoder 30 is adapted to transmit specific information to the platform 20 by radio to the controller 28. In fact, the information specific to a platform 20 is transmitted by the radio encoder 30 when the platform 20 is devoid of platform façades 22.
- the platform-specific information transmitted by the radio encoder 30 is a secure Ethernet format message representative of the number of the platform 20.
- the radio encoder 30 is adapted not to transmit information to the controller 28, which means that the platform 20 is equipped with platform facades 22.
- each inhibitor device 26 is a wire connection connected firstly to the radio encoder 30 and secondly connected to a power source via a switch.
- the power source is, for example, a battery delivering a DC current whose voltage is about 24 V.
- the inhibiting devices 26A and 26B of the two equipped wharves 20A and 20B are not powered and the specific state of the wharves 20A and 20B takes the value "false”.
- the inhibitor device 26C of the quay 20C without dock facades is powered and the shore-specific state 20C takes the value "true”.
- the radio encoder 30 transmits to the controller 28 only information specific to the dock 20C devoid of dock facades.
- the controller 28 is, for example, the embedded part of a CBTC system.
- the controller is, for example, the ATC on board, the English "Automatic Train Control".
- the controller 28 comprises an antenna and is adapted to exchange messages by radio with the communication interface 24.
- controller 28 includes a memory comprising software instructions and a processor capable of executing at least a portion of the instructions.
- the controller memory 28 contains a database that includes a set of data sets.
- each of the platforms 20, whether the platforms 20 are equipped with platform facades 22 or not, are associated in the database with a set corresponding data.
- a dataset is a set of at least one data.
- Each data set includes, for example, at least one position and one duration.
- the position corresponds, for example, to the distance separating a predetermined point of the vehicle 16 from the end of the quay 20 corresponding.
- the duration is, for example, the time elapsing between the transmission by the controller 28 of the closing control of the platform facades 22 and the reception by the controller 28 of a message indicating that the platform facades 22 are locked in position. closing position.
- the memory of the controller 28 further contains instructions relating to a first protocol and a second protocol, the controller 28 being adapted to implement a first protocol and a second protocol.
- the first protocol and the second protocol are distinct.
- the first and second protocols are implemented exclusively from one another. By this, it is understood that the controller 28 executes only one of the two protocols at a time.
- the first protocol and the second protocol each ensure the arrival of the vehicle 16 at each station 14 and / or the departure of the vehicle 16 from each station 14.
- the first protocol is intended for the case where the vehicle 16 is stationary or approaches a platform 20 with platform facades 22.
- the second protocol is intended for the case where the vehicle 16 parks or approaches a platform 20 without dock facades.
- the controller 28 is installed in the vehicle and is adapted to implement, by default, the first protocol.
- the controller 28 is adapted to convert a dataset into instructions.
- the controller 28 is adapted to convert the corresponding data set into instructions. the database at the current pier.
- An instruction is at least one command addressed to elements of the vehicle 16.
- the elements are, for example, a braking system, a motorization system or a system for opening / closing the doors of the vehicle 16.
- the instructions are, for example, instructions for moving the vehicle 16 or instructions for opening / closing the doors of the vehicle 16.
- the movement instructions result from the distance contained in the associated data set in the database. data at the current pier.
- a schematic representation of the management system 18 is illustrated on the figure 2 , the communication interface 24 has not been shown.
- the wired connections are connected to the platform frontage management module.
- each control or status signal is transmitted via a respective wire connection.
- a first wired connection 36 is capable of transmitting an opening signal of the doors of the wharf facades 22
- a second wired connection 38 is capable of transmitting a door closing signal of the wharf facades 22
- a third wired connection 40 is capable of transmitting a state of locking the doors of the wharf facades 22 in the closed position
- a fourth wired connection 42 is able to manually transmit a state of impossibility of transmitting a state of locking of the doors of the wharf facades 22 in the closed position.
- the wired connections 36 to 42 corresponding are connected to the wharves 20A and 20B.
- the corresponding first and second connections 36 and 38 are waiting for connection, and the corresponding third and fourth connections 40 and 42 are connected to a ground.
- the respective wired connections of the inhibitor devices 26 of the platforms 20 with platform façades 22 are connected to ground.
- the respective wire connections of the inhibitor devices 26 of the platforms 20 without platform façades 22 are connected to a battery 44.
- the method is intended to manage the circulation of at least one vehicle 16 in a railway facility 10, the platforms 20 of which do not necessarily contain all of the platform façades 22.
- the method comprises an initial step of providing, not shown.
- the initial provisioning step consists in providing, for each platform 20, a data set specific to the platform 20, the controller 28 of each of the vehicles 16 having access to the data sets.
- the provisioning step consists in recording in the database of the controller 28 of each of the vehicles 16 the data sets by associating them respectively with each of the platforms 20 of the railway installation 10 on which the vehicles 16 are capable of to circulate.
- the data sets are stored on another information storage medium accessed by the controllers 28 of each of the vehicles 16.
- the value of the duration derives, for example, from the type of platform façades 22 already installed or to be installed on the platforms 20 which is known.
- the value of the duration is the same for each of the platforms 20 with or without platform facades 22.
- the vehicle 16 travels on the lanes 12 by defining a road, the next dock 20 on the road being called current dock.
- the controller 28 implements, by default, the first protocol which is described below.
- test step 102 is implemented.
- the result of the test step 102 is marked O or N.
- the result of the test step 102 results from a step of possible transmission to the controller 28 of information specific to the current platform.
- the possible transmission step is implemented by the inhibiting device 26 corresponding to the current platform.
- the step of possible transmission of information specific to the current platform is implemented when the current platform is devoid of platform facades 22.
- the specific information possibly transmitted during the possible transmission step is a message transmitted by radio to the controller 28.
- the inhibitor device 26 of the current platform is not electrically powered.
- the radio encoder 30 does not transmit information specific to the current platform to the controller 28.
- the step of possibly transmitting information specific to the current platform is not implemented and the result of the test step 102 is N.
- the controller 28 continues to implement the first protocol according to the steps 100.
- the absence of transmission and therefore the absence of reception by the controller 28 of information specific to the current platform has no effect on the controller 28 which implements the first protocol.
- the first protocol is to convert a dataset into instructions.
- the instructions are instructions for moving the vehicle 16 and for opening / closing the doors of the vehicle 16.
- the implementation of the first protocol consists in converting the data set corresponding to the current platform into instructions so that the movements and the opening / closing of the doors of the vehicle 16 articulate correctly with the presence of platform façades 22.
- the controller 28 controls the entry station of the vehicle 16.
- the controller 28 reads from the database the value of the position associated with the current platform. From the value of the read position, the controller 28 controls the stopping of the vehicle 16 so that the doors of the vehicle 16 coincide with the doors of the platform facades 22 when the vehicle 16 is stopped.
- the controller 28 transmits to the management module of the platform facades 22 of the current platform the opening control of the doors of the platform facades 22. For example simultaneously, the controller controls the opening of the doors of the vehicle 16.
- the controller 28 reads from the database the value of the duration associated with the current platform. From the value of the duration read and the schedule to be respected, the controller 28 determines the moment for transmitting to the management module of the platform facades 22 of the current platform the command for closing the doors and for controlling the closing of the doors. of the vehicle 16.
- the controller 28 then waits to receive the signal indicating that the doors of the platform facades 22 of the current platform are locked in the closed position.
- the controller 28 controls the departure of the vehicle 16.
- the inhibiting device 26 of the current platform is then electrically powered.
- the radio encoder 30 transmits specific information to the current dock to the controller 28.
- the step of possibly transmitting information specific to the current platform is implemented and the result of the test step 102 is O.
- the controller 28 implements the second protocol according to steps 104.
- the implementation of the first protocol by the controller 28 is inhibited by receiving information specific to the current platform.
- step 104 the controller 28 controls the movements of the vehicle 16 without waiting to receive the signal indicating that the doors of the wharf facades 22 of the current dock are locked in the closed position to enter the station or to leave the station.
- controller 28 does not control the stopping of the vehicle 16 at a specific location of the current wharf and does not take into account the value of the associated time in the database at the current wharf.
- the present solution has a number of advantages.
- the implementation of the method is the same regardless of the configuration of the railway installation 10.
- configuration of the railway facility 10 it is understood the presence or absence of dock facades 22 on the platforms 20 of the railway facility 10.
- the method is adapted to the evolution of the configuration of the railway installation 10, that is to say during the installation of new wharf facades 22 or dismantling or a state of repair. out-of-service dock facades 22 already installed.
- a modification of the configuration of the railway installation 10 does not require any modification of the controllers 28 of each of the vehicles 16. This has an advantage in the sense that, in the state of the art, the controllers 28 are each reconfigured as the configuration of the railway facility changes 10.
- platform facades 22 are installed on a dock 20 which was previously lacking, it is then sufficient to cut off the power supply of the inhibitor device 26 which is installed on the platform 20. In fact, the controller 28 will no longer receive the information specific to the platform and, in addition, already contains in its database the dataset necessary for the implementation of the first protocol.
- the present method is simple and inexpensive to implement since the method requires only a few substantial modifications of the software instructions generally implemented by the controller 28 and a simple wired connection or not is to be installed at ground.
- the inhibitor devices 26 each installed on a platform 20 are replaced by a single overall inhibiting device.
- the global inhibitor device is for example a memory adapted to store for each platform 20A, 20B, 20C a specific state to the wharf.
- the global inhibitory device is adapted to transmit specific information to all the platforms 20.
- the controller 28 receives the information specific to all the platforms 20 and, consequently, the control 28 will constantly implement the second protocol.
- the step of transmitting specific information to a platform is implemented when each of the platforms 20 is devoid of platform façades 22.
- the first variant concerns the case where each of the platforms 20 is devoid of platform façades 22 and where the operator of the railway installation 10 plans to equip all the quays 20 with platform façades 22 in one go.
- inhibitory devices are responsible for transmitting specific information to at least two platforms 20.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR1652829A FR3049555B1 (fr) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Procede de gestion de la circulation de vehicules dans une installation ferroviaire, systeme de gestion et installation ferroviaire associes |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3225499A1 true EP3225499A1 (de) | 2017-10-04 |
| EP3225499B1 EP3225499B1 (de) | 2018-09-12 |
Family
ID=55863114
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP17163565.9A Active EP3225499B1 (de) | 2016-03-31 | 2017-03-29 | Verfahren zur steuerung des verkehrs von fahrzeugen auf einem schienennetz, entsprechendes steuerungssystem und entsprechende schienenanlage |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3225499B1 (de) |
| FR (1) | FR3049555B1 (de) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2070800A2 (de) * | 2002-07-31 | 2009-06-17 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von Bahnsteigtüren |
| WO2010040654A1 (de) * | 2008-10-09 | 2010-04-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erhöhung der haltegenauigkeit eines bewegten objektes |
| EP2778014A1 (de) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-17 | ALSTOM Transport SA | Verfahren zur Steuerung des Verkehrs auf einer automatischen Metrolinie und entsprechendes System |
| WO2015028318A1 (de) * | 2013-08-27 | 2015-03-05 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur steuerung von bahnsteigtüren und bahnsteigtüren-steuerungseinrichtung |
| WO2016042168A1 (de) * | 2014-09-19 | 2016-03-24 | Gebr. Bode Gmbh & Co. Kg | Türsystem mit sensoreinheit und kommunikationselement |
-
2016
- 2016-03-31 FR FR1652829A patent/FR3049555B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-03-29 EP EP17163565.9A patent/EP3225499B1/de active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2070800A2 (de) * | 2002-07-31 | 2009-06-17 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von Bahnsteigtüren |
| WO2010040654A1 (de) * | 2008-10-09 | 2010-04-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erhöhung der haltegenauigkeit eines bewegten objektes |
| EP2778014A1 (de) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-17 | ALSTOM Transport SA | Verfahren zur Steuerung des Verkehrs auf einer automatischen Metrolinie und entsprechendes System |
| WO2015028318A1 (de) * | 2013-08-27 | 2015-03-05 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur steuerung von bahnsteigtüren und bahnsteigtüren-steuerungseinrichtung |
| WO2016042168A1 (de) * | 2014-09-19 | 2016-03-24 | Gebr. Bode Gmbh & Co. Kg | Türsystem mit sensoreinheit und kommunikationselement |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| CHARAOUD J M ET AL: "Les automatismes au coeur de la migration de la ligne", REVUE GENERALE DES CHEMINS DE FER, CENTRALE DES REVUES DUNOD-GAUTHIER-VILLARS. PARIS, FR, no. 223, 1 January 2013 (2013-01-01), pages 24 - 41, XP001537472, ISSN: 0035-3183 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3225499B1 (de) | 2018-09-12 |
| FR3049555B1 (fr) | 2018-04-27 |
| FR3049555A1 (fr) | 2017-10-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP2648960B1 (de) | Verfahren zur informationsübertragung zwischen einer bordseitigen steuereinheit und einem öffentlichen verkehrsnetz | |
| EP1950694B1 (de) | Gesichertes Warenüberwachungssystem | |
| EP2550191A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur verwaltung bestimmter ereignisse im zusammenhang mit den bewegungen eines geführten fahrzeuges | |
| US9886855B2 (en) | Systems and methods for monitoring a parking space | |
| FR3035633A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif pour reduire le risque associe a un vehicule gare sur un emplacement de stationnement | |
| FR3075742A1 (fr) | Procede de reinitialisation d'un controleur de zone et systeme associe de controle automatique des trains | |
| FR2958248A1 (fr) | Procede de gestion de la circulation de vehicules sur un reseau ferroviaire et systeme associe | |
| EP2778014B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung des Verkehrs auf einer automatischen Metrolinie und entsprechendes System | |
| EP3300989B1 (de) | Ausrüstung zur kontrolle mindestens einer gleisausrüstung eines schienennetzes, und entsprechendes schienensystem | |
| EP3225500A1 (de) | Anlage zur verkehrsüberwachung innerhalb eines schienennetzes, und entsprechender funk-kodierer | |
| FR3033757B1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de gestion d'un vehicule ainsi que procede et dispositif de gestion d'un parc de stationnement | |
| EP0805427A1 (de) | Tragbares Gehäuse zum Informieren von Busnetzbenutzern über Wartezeiten an den Busnetzhaltestellen | |
| EP2923915A1 (de) | Ausrüstung für ein sekundärerfassungssystem auf dem gleis, und signalisierungssystem, das eine solche ausrüstung enthält | |
| EP2835303A1 (de) | Steuerungsverfahren des Verkehrs von Fahrzeugen auf einem Schienennetz, entsprechende Steuerzentrale und entsprechendes System | |
| EP3225499B1 (de) | Verfahren zur steuerung des verkehrs von fahrzeugen auf einem schienennetz, entsprechendes steuerungssystem und entsprechende schienenanlage | |
| FR2974936A1 (fr) | Systeme de guidage automatique de vehicule electrique dans un espace dedie au stationnement, vehicule et procede associes | |
| FR2781744A1 (fr) | Systeme anti-collision pour passage a niveau | |
| FR3057230A1 (fr) | Procede de gestion d'une manoeuvre d'un train sur une portion de voie ferree equipee d'un systeme de signalisation | |
| CA2962887C (fr) | Procede de gestion de circulation d'un vehicule ferroviaire avec protection anticollision laterale | |
| US20210311497A1 (en) | Operation management apparatus, operation management method, and traffic system | |
| FR3101841A1 (fr) | Système de gestion de la circulation de véhicules ferroviaires sur des voies de service d’un réseau ferroviaire | |
| BE1027884B1 (fr) | Système de sécurisation de voies ferroviaires de maintenance | |
| EP4437741B1 (de) | Verfolgungsverfahren und -vorrichtung für ein transportnetzwerk | |
| FR3144095A1 (fr) | Passage à niveau et procédé d’actionnement d’un tel passage à niveau. | |
| FR3105539A1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion d’un état de crise d’un premier véhicule et dispositif de gestion associé |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170915 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B61B 1/02 20060101ALN20180112BHEP Ipc: B61L 3/12 20060101ALI20180112BHEP Ipc: B61L 15/00 20060101ALI20180112BHEP Ipc: B61L 27/00 20060101AFI20180112BHEP |
|
| RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: BALLESTEROS, JAVIER Inventor name: BRESSON, MATHIEU |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 1236902 Country of ref document: HK |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| GRAR | Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B61L 15/00 20060101ALI20180622BHEP Ipc: B61L 27/00 20060101AFI20180622BHEP Ipc: B61L 3/12 20060101ALI20180622BHEP Ipc: B61B 1/02 20060101ALN20180622BHEP |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180726 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602017000384 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1040192 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181015 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181213 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181212 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1040192 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190112 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190112 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602017000384 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190613 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602017000384 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190329 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191001 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190329 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20170329 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180912 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20250213 AND 20250219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: ALSTOM HOLDINGS; FR Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES Effective date: 20241025 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20260319 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20260324 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20260323 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20260323 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20260324 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20260319 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20260320 Year of fee payment: 10 |